The New Age, Vol 26 No 12
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
GERMANY’S NEW “STRUM UND DRANG.” ADLER. By J. A.M. Alcock. By HermanGeorge Scheffauer (with comments by (with commentsby R. H. C.). CONTEMPORARYFRAGMENTS -- II ByJanko Lavrin THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.-- I. By Hillaire Belloc. VIEWS AND REVIEWS. Homoeopathy. By A. E. R. ROME AND PERSECUTION. By Eugene Fasnacht. REVIEWS: The Skilled Labourer, 1760-1832. THE MATERIALISMOF “A. E. R. ” By P. A.Mairet A Personal Record. THE REVOLT OF INTELLIGENCE-- VII. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR from Douglas Goldring, Arundell del Re, George Pitt-Rivers, Walter By Ezra Pound. W. Sutcliffe, Ezra Pound. DRAMA: Julius Caesar. By John Francis Hope PASTICHE. By J. A. M. A., E. V. Limebeer, READERS AND WRITERS. By R. H. C. Ruth Pitter. [Owing to the illness of the Editor the following -- even though not forced, like Germany, to stand article is substituted for the usual “Notes of the naked, wounded and chained before Brute Might armed Week.”] to the tusks, and incorporated in two insensate old men drunk with primitive rages and boundless power. A “volcaniceruption” appears to be something different from the still, small voice of Culture. However, let Germany’s New “Sturm und that pass for the moment. The contention, explicit in Drang.” Mr. Scheffauer’s paragraph is that Germany was By Herman George Scheffauer. “entitled” to her fling of “harlotry”in consequence of England’s example. The ethic is execrable, but the (With comments by “R. H. C.”) practical moral is that Germany has no right to complain In THE NEW AGE of December 18, “R. H. C.,” of the “BruteMight” that defeated her. If it is only commenting upon Nietzsche’s mission as a prophet of right to do anything we can, our failure must prove that culture to Germany, asks: “But is there any appeal in what we attempted was wrung! culture to a Germany situated as Germany is to-day?” A land so compact of bulk as Germany, so finely and Mr. Scheffauer must have been looking for a quarrel, scientifically organised, of such dynamic popular forces since there is nothing in my text of December 18 to and will to work, cannot resign or be deprived of its warrant his conclusion that I was attacking Germany. economic importance and participation without undermining I simply asked whether the cry from the muezzin to come the entire structure of world trade and traffic. to culture would be heard in Germany above the din of International trade is already sick and shaky because the big bagman calling Germany to commercial conquests the sound and efficient German element has been in Russia. If Nietzsche was not listened to after 1870, brutallyand blindly driven out of it. Rut already it is as I doubted whether he would be listened to any more after if the latent creative energies of this land had gone 1918. In fact, I am convinced that Nietzsche is nowhere forth to conquer a new empire. Though it can never so dead as in Germany to-day. forgo just claims, it seems content to leave the offal That conditions in Germany, particularly cultural and rubbish of a doomed mechanised and Mammonised conditions, should not be clear to “R. H. C.” and epoch to those to whom these things are still Baal. millionsof others, is not surprising. For “R. H. C.,” like Ah, now we are getting down to the bones! Creative other Englishmen and Americans, is dependent upon his energies going forth to “conquera new empire” by Press -- and such a Press! means of “scientificorganisation,” etc., etc. The It is strange to hear that I, or any NEW AGE writer, terminology is not cultural but big bagmen. am dependent upon the British Press for our surmises The collapse of German militarism, the sudden recoil concerning the spiritual condition of Germany. I do not of the tremendous spring, has unloosed unconjectured say that I do not read the reports of newspaper correspondents, but it is largely between the lines. forces, precisely as the triumph of Entente militarism, Moreover,we have other sources of information than the the ostensible triumph, has for the time being printed Press, as Mr. Scheffauer knows very well. The suppressed them in Entente countries. I have said, proof of the pudding is in the eating. Mr. Scheffauer, purposely, the collapse of German militarism. Of a real living in Berlin, has been consistently wrong throughout defeat in the one case, as of a real triumph in the other, the war -- wrong in point of forecast, I mean -- while there can be no question. The discomfiting consciousness THE NEW AGE has been consistently right. History will of this fact largely accounts for the rancour and repeat itself. spite with which the “victors” seek to humiliate their Yet the fact is there -- it is here -- like a hill, a sea, fallen foe. I have no love for militarism of any sortin a volcanic eruption. Germany, after her brief any nation, as my little masque, “The Hollow Head a-whoring after the abominations of British Imperialism of Mars” (London, 1915) will sufficiently attest. And and commercialism (to which, of course, she was fully yet, as I made bold to point-out in my controversy with entitled, as America is entitled to the same harlotry S. Verdad in THE NEW AGE some time in 1917, Prussian now), is once more becoming “the land of poets and militarism qua militarism had justified itself by the thinkers,” No people could demand a grander title sheer stupendousness of its achievements against overwhelmingodds and the most disadvantageous conditions. published than in war-time or in peace-time, when After a certain point it could no longer be Gemany’s production reached (1912)34,800 volumes, defeated in a fair trial of strength, nor in a clean, England’s 12,100, France’s 9,600, or 51, 25, and 24 per soldierly way. It could only be overwhelmed by mass, head of population respectively. that is, by the victory of quantity over quality -- as came Quantity again. Always this boasting of numbers and to pass. The fact that it was necessary artificially to size. But it is perfectly conceivable that as culture drum up the whole world against Prussian militarism improves the number of publications will diminish rather should not only be its best military, but its best moral than increase. Indeed, it is certain. Mr. Scheffauer’s justification. If the actual values of the war be read figures neatly prove it. aright and honestly, nothing achieved a greater triumph Countless new reviews, magazines and newspapers, than precisely Prussian militarism. political, artistic, ethical: sociological, dramatic, etc., Mr. Scheffauer, like far too many Germans, obviously all of them sharply individualistic, crying and only pretends to hate militarism. At heart he is proud hummingwith new ideas, ideals, tendenzen and Utopias, of Prussian militarism, and only sorry that his god come swooping upon the public like swarms of cranes suffered the ignominy of defeat. Nor was it even a -- and gnats. defeat, he thinks. No, it was a “collapse” -- in other Really, for the reader of THE NEW AGE which Mr. words, I presume, a voluntary surrender. Yet it was Scheffauer professes to be (and, may I add, as a significant not that either, but the defeat of quality by quantity. fact, that he is our only reader in Germany?) this In short, it was a moral victory for “preciselyPrussian argument is scandalous. I am always deprecating the militarism,” the thing for which Mr. Scheffauer professes spawning of new magazines in this country as precisely to have “no love.” This attitude is repellent in the a symptom of declining culture; yet here is Mr. Scheffauer extreme. Simultaneously with the denunciation of the trying to palm off on me a swarm of new journals crime, the criminal asks our admiration for its stupendous as evidence of improved culture in Germany. Resides, dimensionsand our pity that so tremendous an it is nothing new in Germany; it is only more like old attempt to go a-whoring after an abomination failed in Germany than ever. its aim. We hare heard of offences forgiven because Germany and its Kultur are still undiscovered territory. they were such little ones. Mr. Scheffauer pleads justification for Prussian militarism because it was so stupendous. What attention, for example, has the Anglo-Yanko At the same time he represents its defeat as the world paid to the new system of popular education defeat of quality by quantity! rough-hewn out of granite opposition by Haenisch, Vast as was her military achievement, it was almost the German Minister of Schools -- a system which will equalled by Germany’s economic achievement under the do much to cast all others into the limbo of the mediaeval? blockade. To-day Germany is torn from without and To mention by name the countless new movements, from within, racked between Progress and Reaction, centres and associations for the intellectual tortured, dismembered, disorganised, drained dry by organisation of the world, for popular education according the beak and tentacles of the gigantic squid that to new needs and principles, for the cultivation of enwraps her, starved and bleeding from wounds that will creative and dynamic thought -- such as Count Hermann not heal. Her cities, factories, and railways are paralysed Keyserling’s “Foundation for Free Philosophy” -- for lack of coal. The cost of living goes higher would weary like the reading of a page of a city directory. day by day. Stung by the adder of particularism, German Let us consider for the benefit of “R. H. C.” combats German, or wallows in orgies of and others the significance in point of culture of the self-denunciation.