DOCSLIB.ORG

Link to How Did Hitler Become the Leader

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Link to How Did Hitler Become the Leader What do you know about Adolf Hitler BEFORE he became leader of Germany? Which world wide What did want to event was he do as a career? involved in? Can you give 3 or Why did he have a more groups of troubled people that Adolf childhood? Hitler dislikes? Did he win any What did he want awards? to change? Born in Austria in 1889. He got on badly with his father but was fond of his mother Aged 16 he left school and went to Vienna to pursue his ambition of becoming an artist. Things went horribly wrong for him and between 1909 and 1914 he was homeless on the streets of Vienna During this period, he developed a hatred of foreigners and Jews He served throughout the First World War with distinction, winning the Iron Cross Hitler found it hard to accept the Treaty of Versailles and felt betrayed by the Jews and capitalists He despised the Weimar democracy and looked back to the ‘glorious days’ of the Kaiser Hitler’s Background Hitler’s He stayed in the army after the war working in Munich as an intelligence officer. Title: How did Hitler become leader of the NSDAP? How do Lesson objectives: political parties in Describe how Hitler became the leader of the UK the NSDAP. elect their leaders? Explain Hitler’s policies (25 point programme). Explain why Hitler was an appealing leader. Individual liberty, rule of law, democracy (or lack Explain how the Nazi Party was organised. of) Hitler’s rise to power – overview 1) When did Hitler become the leader of the NSDAP? January 1920 2) How many members did they have by 1923? 3,000 3) Name the 4 key members Rohm, Geobbels, Goring, Himmler 4) What was Hitler’s plan to take over Germany called? The Munich Putsch 5) What was Hitler’s book called? Mein Kampf 6) How much did unemployment rise by between 1928-32? 5 million 7) When did Hitler become Chancellor? 30th January 1933 https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z3bp82p/revision/1 8) What did the Enabling Act allow Hitler to do? Make laws without the help or approval of the government. 9) What happened to the Jews once Hitler came to power? Removed from professional jobs such as judges, teachers. 10) What did Hitler do on the Night of the Long Knives? Murdered 400 members of his own party he saw as opponents to his leadership. Hitler’s rise to power – overview 1) When did Hitler become the leader of the NSDAP? 2) How many members did they have by 1923? 3) Name the 4 key members 4) What was Hitler’s plan to take over Germany called? 5) What was Hitler’s book called? 6) How much did unemployment rise by between 1928-32? 7) When did Hitler become Chancellor? https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z3bp82p/revision/1 8) What did the Enabling Act allow Hitler to do? 9) What happened to the Jews once Hitler came to power? 10) What did Hitler do on the Night of the Long Knives? In January 1919, Hitler is sent to investigate the DAP by the German Army. He attends a meeting and gets involved, impressing Drexler who invites him to join the party. At that time, the DAP is a tiny organisation, Hitler was only the 55th member of the party. Hitler rose in importance, becoming Drexler’s second hand man and the Head of Propaganda for the party. Within two years the party had grown in size to 2,000 members and Hitler had firmly established himself as the absolute leader of the party. Party Policy – The Twenty-Five Point Programme Hitler began to have more influence over the political direction of the DAP. It was a party of protest, its main opponents were: -The Jews who were blamed for undermining Germany -Democracy which they believed to be weakening Germany -The Weimar politicians who had made peace and accepted the Treaty of Versailles. In January 1920, Hitler became the Head of Propaganda. In February, Hitler and Drexler wrote the party’s Twenty Five Point Programme, a document explaining the core policies of the German Worker’s Party. On your copy of the 25 Point Programme, using the following key, identify which points relate to each factor: • Oppose the Treaty of Versailles • Improve the country’s economy • Improve education standards • Restrict and control civil liberties (personal freedom) • Socialist (Support workers against big business and industry) • Nationalist (Make Germany stronger) • Anti-Semitic (Anti Jewish) Start with these points: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, 22, 23, 24 and 25 Give two things you can infer from Source A about the NSDAP in the 1920s. Mark scheme 1-2 marks: Simple statements pointing out things in the source. 3-4 marks: A supported INFERENCE (an idea about what the source means or what its message is) from the source backed up by examples and your own knowledge to help you explain. Complete the table below to explain your answer. (i) What I can infer… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Details in the source that tell me this… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. (i) What I can infer… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Details in the source that tell me this… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Give two things you can infer from Source A about the NSDAP in the 1920s. Mark scheme 1-2 marks: Simple statements pointing out things in the source. 3-4 marks: A supported INFERENCE (an idea about what the source means or what its message is) from the source backed up by examples and your own knowledge to help you explain. Complete the table below to explain your answer. (i) What I can infer…from Source A about the NSDAP in the 1920s is that Hitler wanted Germany to have one strong leader. Details in the source that tell me this…”We demand the creation of a strong central state power for the Reich”. (i) What I can infer…from Source A about the NSDAP in the 1920s is that they were forceful yet clear about their political policies. Details in the source that tell me this…is the phrase “we demand” is repeat throughout the source suggesting that the NSDAP was willing to use any means possible to met its goals. Hitler’s Personal Appeal Party Organisation Why was Hitler such a good speaker? What four changes did Hitler make to the party and how did that lead to growth? What evidence is there that his speeches caused party growth? The Early Nazi Party 1919-1922 Party Leadership When did Hitler get control of the Party? How did he choose his party leadership team? The Role of the SA What sort of organisation was the SA? What members of the team were there? What kind of people were in it? How did they strengthen the Nazi Party? How did they strengthen Hitler? What other key figures was Hitler making friends with? Hitler’s Personal Appeal Soon after Hitler joined the DAP it became clear that Hitler’s personal appeal as an extremely captivating orator (public speaker) was a significant reason for the growing popularity of the party. Hitler’s speeches were exciting for a few reasons: - Hitler carefully rehearsed his speeches. He usually started slowly and quietly, building up the tension towards a passionate and frenzied rant at the end. Although his speeches were often very frantic and aggressive, they were persuasive. - His gestures were a key part of his appeal. He would lean in and fix his eyes on the audience, drawing them in. He would vigorously wave his arms about and punch the air. - His publicity photos and paintings often showed him speaking to a crowd. At the 46 party gatherings held between November 1919-1920, Hitler was the star speaker at 31 of them. His appeal and fame spread, and with it membership in the party. This grew to 1,000 by July 1920, and 3,000 by December 1920. Although Hitler was one of seven other leading members in the party, it was clear that the majority of the new members were his supporters. Party Organisation By 1920 Hitler was Anton Drexler’s right hand man. He began to make big changes to the party’s organisation. - In January 1920 the DAP set up a permanent office in Munich. Hitler chose Rudolf Schussler, a personal friend from the army, as the party’s administrator. This meant that meetings were more organised and better advertised and led to greater membership and party funds. - Hitler suggested a new name for the party. The 25 Point Programme had focused on “Nationalism” and “Socialism”. This led to the new name, The Nationalist Socialist German Worker’s Party (NSDAP). This name appealed to more people and also caused party growth. - The new NSDAP adopted its new logo, the Swastika, and the iconic straight armed army style salute. This made the NSDAP stand out from the other right wing extremist parties. - By the end of 1920, the bigger membership and greater funds allowed the party to purchase a newspaper, the Volkischer Beobatcher (The People’s Observer). It cost 180,000 marks but within a year its circulation had risen from 11,000 to 17,000 copies. This spread the National Socialist voice across Germany. Party Leadership In July 1921 Hitler forced a leadership challenge and defeated Drexler. Hitler was now in control of the party, to help him maintain control Hitler surrounded himself with supporters and friends. They were carefully suggested for their loyalty, skills, and the image they presented. These included: • Rudolf Hess – A wealthy, intelligent academic. He became Hitler’s deputy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • D'antonio, Michael Senior Thesis.Pdf
    Before the Storm German Big Business and the Rise of the NSDAP by Michael D’Antonio A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honors Degree in History with Distinction Spring 2016 © 2016 Michael D’Antonio All Rights Reserved Before the Storm German Big Business and the Rise of the NSDAP by Michael D’Antonio Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. James Brophy Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. David Shearer Committee member from the Department of History Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. Barbara Settles Committee member from the Board of Senior Thesis Readers Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Michael Arnold, Ph.D. Director, University Honors Program ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This senior thesis would not have been possible without the assistance of Dr. James Brophy of the University of Delaware history department. His guidance in research, focused critique, and continued encouragement were instrumental in the project’s formation and completion. The University of Delaware Office of Undergraduate Research also deserves a special thanks, for its continued support of both this work and the work of countless other students. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Organiser: Hitler's Rise to Power, 1919-33
    Knowledge organiser: Hitler’s Rise to Power, 1919-33 Hitler joined the Nazi Party in 1919 and was Chronology: what happened on these dates? Vocabulary: define these words. influential in defining its beliefs. He also led the Hitler joined the German Workers’ Party (DAP). In Private armies set up by Munich Putsch in 1923. However, from 1924 to 1929 1919 DAP, Hitler discovered he was good at public Freikorps senior German army officers the unpopular party gained little electoral success. speaking. at the end of WW1. The belief that land, industry Summarise your learning Hitler set up the Nazi Party. The party was based During the five years after the war, 1920 Socialism and wealth should be owned on the Twenty-Five Point Programme. several new parties emerged, by the state. Topic 1: including DAP. As it grew, it added The Munich Putsch was an attempt to overthrow The belief that the interests of The the words ‘national’ and ‘socialist’ to 1923 the Weimar Republic, which would allow Hitler to Nationalism a particular nation-state are development become the NSDAP and acquired the form his own Nazi government. of primary importance. of the Nazi new leader, Hitler. The party carried Party, 1920- When the US stock market collapsed in October – Literally ‘of the people’. In out the Munich Putsch, but failed. In 29 the Wall Street Crash – the problems created had Völkisch Germany it was linked to the years 1925-28 Hitler reorganised huge consequences for the German economy. extreme German nationalism. the Nazi Party. 1929 The death of Stresemann also added to the crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Isdap Electoral Breakthrough
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1976 The evelopmeD nt and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Nsdap Electoral Breakthrough. Thomas Wiles Arafe Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Arafe, Thomas Wiles Jr, "The eD velopment and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Nsdap Electoral Breakthrough." (1976). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2909. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2909 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. « The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing pega(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monita Secreta Or, As It Was Also Known As, The
    James Bernauer, S.J. Boston College From European Anti-Jesuitism to German Anti-Jewishness: A Tale of Two Texts “Jews and Jesuits will move heaven and hell against you.” --Kurt Lüdecke, in conversation with Adolf Hitleri A Presentation at the Conference “Honoring Stanislaw Musial” Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland (March 5, 2009) The current intense debate about the significance of “political religion” as a mode of analyzing fascism leads us to the core of the crisis in understanding the Holocaust.ii Saul Friedländer has written of an “historian‟s paralysis” that “arises from the simultaneity and the interaction of entirely heterogeneous phenomena: messianic fanaticism and bureaucratic structures, pathological impulses and administrative decrees, archaic attitudes within an advanced industrial society.”iii Despite the conflicting voices in the discussion of political religion, the debate does acknowledge two relevant facts: the obvious intermingling in Nazism of religious and secular phenomena; secondly, the underestimated role exercised by Munich Catholicism in the early life of the Nazi party.iv My essay is an effort to illumine one thread in this complex territory of political religion and Nazism and my title conveys its hypotheses. First, that the centuries long polemic against the Roman Catholic religious order the Jesuits, namely, its fabrication of the Jesuit image as cynical corrupter of Christianity and European culture, provided an important template for the Nazi imagining of Jewry after its emancipation.v This claim will be exhibited in a consideration of two historically influential texts: the Monita 1 secreta which demonized the Jesuits and the Protocols of the Sages of Zion which diabolized the Jews.vi In the light of this examination, I shall claim that an intermingled rhetoric of Jesuit and Jewish wills to power operated in the imagination of some within the Nazi leadership, the most important of whom was Adolf Hitler himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of a Crisis
    Page 7 Chapter 2 Munich: Anatomy of A Crisis eptember 28, 1938, “Black Wednesday,” dawned on a frightened Europe. Since the spring Adolf Hitler had spoken often about the Sudetenland, the western part of Czechoslovakia. Many of the 3 Smillion German-speaking people who lived there had complained that they were being badly mistreated by the Czechs and Slovaks. Cooperating closely with Sudeten Nazis, Hitler at first simply demanded that the Czechs give the German-speakers within their borders self-government. Then, he upped the ante. If the Czechs did not hand the Sudetenland to him by October 1, 1938, he would order his well-armed and trained soldiers to attack Czechoslovakia, destroy its army, and seize the Sudetenland. The Strategic Location of the Sudetenland Germany’s demand quickly reverberated throughout the European continent. Many countries, tied down by various commitments and alliances, pondered whether—and how—to respond to Hitler’s latest threat. France had signed a treaty to defend the Czechs and Britain had a treaty with France; the USSR had promised to defend Czechoslovakia against a German attack. Britain, in particular, found itself in an awkward position. To back the French and their Czech allies would almost guarantee the outbreak of an unpredictable and potentially ruinous continental war; yet to refrain from confronting Hitler over the Sudetenland would mean victory for the Germans. In an effort to avert the frightening possibilities, a group of European leaders converged at Munich Background to the Crisis The clash between Germany and Czechoslovakia over the Sudetenland had its origins in the Versailles Treaty of 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Events 1918 – 1938
    Chronology of Events 1918-1938 1918: Czechoslovakia is established after the fall of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire following the First World War. The country is made up of two groups of Slavic peoples, the Czechs and the Slovaks. 1920: The Treaty of Versailles, in which Germany is held responsible for World War I and its consequences, is signed. The treaty deals harshly with a defeated Germany and includes territorial, military, financial and general provisions, including the demilitarization and 15-year occupation of the Rhineland (area between France and Germany), limitations on German armed forces and reparations of 6,600 million pounds. 1921: Adolf Hitler becomes leader of National Socialist German Workers (Nazi) Party. 1923: Beer Hall Putsch (Hitler’s attempt to overthrow regional government in Munich) is unsuccessful and Hitler is jailed. 1925: Mein Kampf (My Struggle), Hitler’s book, is published. 1933: Japan attacks China. The Nazi party gains majority in the German Reichstag and Hitler is named Chancellor. The Reichstag building burns in a “mysterious” fire and all other political parties are abolished. Hitler denounces the Treaty of Versailles. There are public book burnings in Germany. Anti-Jewish laws are passed in Germany: no kosher butchering, no Jewish Civil servants, no Jewish lawyers, quotas for Jews in universities. Any Germans holding non-Nazi political meetings are subject to arrest and imprisonment in concentration camps (the first is Oranienburg, outside of Berlin). Dachau is built as concentration-work camp (specific death camps not yet built, but elderly, those who were very young, disabled or sick have difficulty surviving harsh conditions of camps).
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
    Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
    [Show full text]
  • Militarism As a Theme in Nazi Education and Youth Organizations Matthew .J Smith Elizabethtown College, [email protected]
    Elizabethtown College JayScholar History: Student Scholarship & Creative Work History Spring 2018 Militarism as a Theme in Nazi Education and Youth Organizations Matthew .J Smith Elizabethtown College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://jayscholar.etown.edu/hisstu Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Matthew J., "Militarism as a Theme in Nazi Education and Youth Organizations" (2018). History: Student Scholarship & Creative Work. 2. https://jayscholar.etown.edu/hisstu/2 This Student Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the History at JayScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in History: Student Scholarship & Creative Work by an authorized administrator of JayScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Smith 1 Matthew J. Smith Militarism as a Theme in Nazi Education and Youth Organizations Italian fascist Achille Starace stated, “Fascist education must be an education for battle.”1 This idea of militarism as a core concept of education was integral not only to Fascism in Italy, but also to Europe’s other rising fascist movement, Nazism. The Nazis reinforced their militaristic education by creating mandatory youth organizations that promoted militarism to young German boys and girls. The twin pillars of a militaristic education system and para- military youth organizations helped Nazi officials achieve their goals by creating a generation of ready servants of the state. Many scholars have researched the militarism that was infused into the German state education system. Lisa Pine, a scholar at London South Bank University, examined the educational system and youth groups that socialized German children with Nazi ideology and militaristic practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Education Standards Grade 4 Standard 1: SS.4.HE.1
    1 Proposed Holocaust Education Standards Grade 4 Standard 1: SS.4.HE.1. Foundations of Holocaust Education SS.4.HE.1.1 Compare and contrast Judaism to other major religions observed around the world, and in the United States and Florida. Grade 5 Standard 1: SS.5.HE.1. Foundations of Holocaust Education SS.5.HE.1.1 Define antisemitism as prejudice against or hatred of the Jewish people. Students will recognize the Holocaust as history’s most extreme example of antisemitism. Teachers will provide students with an age-appropriate definition of with the Holocaust. Grades 6-8 Standard 1: SS.68.HE.1. Foundations of Holocaust Education SS.68.HE.1.1 Define the Holocaust as the planned and systematic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of European Jews by Nazi Germany and its collaborators between 1933 and 1945. Students will recognize the Holocaust as history’s most extreme example of antisemitism. Students will define antisemitism as prejudice against or hatred of Jewish people. Grades 9-12 Standard 1: SS.HE.912.1. Analyze the origins of antisemitism and its use by the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazi) regime. SS.912.HE.1.1 Define the terms Shoah and Holocaust. Students will distinguish how the terms are appropriately applied in different contexts. SS.912.HE.1.2 Explain the origins of antisemitism. Students will recognize that the political, social and economic applications of antisemitism led to the organized pogroms against Jewish people. Students will recognize that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a hoax and utilized as propaganda against Jewish people both in Europe and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • German’ Communities from Eastern Europe at the End of the Second World War
    EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND CIVILIZATION EUI Working Paper HEC No. 2004/1 The Expulsion of the ‘German’ Communities from Eastern Europe at the End of the Second World War Edited by STEFFEN PRAUSER and ARFON REES BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO (FI) All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author(s). © 2004 Steffen Prauser and Arfon Rees and individual authors Published in Italy December 2004 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50016 San Domenico (FI) Italy www.iue.it Contents Introduction: Steffen Prauser and Arfon Rees 1 Chapter 1: Piotr Pykel: The Expulsion of the Germans from Czechoslovakia 11 Chapter 2: Tomasz Kamusella: The Expulsion of the Population Categorized as ‘Germans' from the Post-1945 Poland 21 Chapter 3: Balázs Apor: The Expulsion of the German Speaking Population from Hungary 33 Chapter 4: Stanislav Sretenovic and Steffen Prauser: The “Expulsion” of the German Speaking Minority from Yugoslavia 47 Chapter 5: Markus Wien: The Germans in Romania – the Ambiguous Fate of a Minority 59 Chapter 6: Tillmann Tegeler: The Expulsion of the German Speakers from the Baltic Countries 71 Chapter 7: Luigi Cajani: School History Textbooks and Forced Population Displacements in Europe after the Second World War 81 Bibliography 91 EUI WP HEC 2004/1 Notes on the Contributors BALÁZS APOR, STEFFEN PRAUSER, PIOTR PYKEL, STANISLAV SRETENOVIC and MARKUS WIEN are researchers in the Department of History and Civilization, European University Institute, Florence. TILLMANN TEGELER is a postgraduate at Osteuropa-Institut Munich, Germany. Dr TOMASZ KAMUSELLA, is a lecturer in modern European history at Opole University, Opole, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout Hitler Letter [Original in German] Museum of Tolerance
    Handout Hitler Letter [Original in German] museum of tolerance Handout Hitler Letter [English translation] HITLER’S FIRST MAJOR STATEMENT ON ANTI-SEMITISM: REPLY TO ADOLF GEMLICH (September 16, 1919) Highly esteemed Gemlich! If the danger represented by the Jews today finds expression in the undeniable dislike of them felt by a large section of our people, the cause of this dislike is on the whole not to be found in the clear recognition of the corrupting activity of the Jews generally among our people, whether conscious or unconscious; it originates mainly through personal relationship, and from the impression left behind him by the individual Jew which is almost invariably unfavorable. Antisemitism thereby acquires only too easily the character of being a manifestation of emotion. But this is wrong. Antisemitism as a political movement must not be, cannot be, determined by emotional criteria, but only through the recognition of facts. The facts are as follows: First, the Jews are definitely a race and not a religious community. The Jew himself never class himself a Jewish German, a Jewish Pole, a Jewish American, but only a German, a Polish, an American Jew. From the foreign nations in whose midst he lives the Jew has adopted very little more than their language. A German who is compelled to use French in France, Italian in Italy, Chinese in China, does not thereby become a Frenchman, an Italian, or a Chinese; similarly a Jew who happens to live among us and is thereby compelled to use the German language cannot be called a German. Even the Mosaic faith, however important for the maintenance of this race, cannot be considered as absolutely decisive in the question of whether or not someone is a Jew.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Military Mission to Romania, 1940-1941 by Richard L. Dinardo
    The German Military Mission to Romania, 1940–1941 By RICHARD L. Di NARDO hen one thinks of security assistance and the train- ing of foreign troops, W Adolf Hitler’s Germany is not a country that typically comes to mind. Yet there were two instances in World War II when Germany did indeed deploy troops to other countries that were in noncombat cir- cumstances. The countries in question were Finland and Romania, and the German mili- tary mission to Romania is the subject of this article. The activities of the German mission to Romania are discussed and analyzed, and some conclusions and hopefully a few take- aways are offered that could be relevant for military professionals today. Creation of the Mission The matter of how the German military mission to Romania came into being can be covered relatively quickly. In late June 1940, the Soviet Union demanded from Romania the cession of both Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina. The only advice Germany could give to the Romanian government was to agree to surrender the territory.1 Fearful of further Soviet encroachments, the Roma- nian government made a series of pleas to Germany including a personal appeal from Wikimedia Commons King Carol II to Hitler for German military assistance in the summer of 1940. Hitler, Finnish Volunteer Battalion of German Waffen-SS return home from front in 1943 however, was not yet willing to undertake such a step. Thus, all Romanian requests were rebuffed with Hitler telling Carol that Romania brought its own problems upon itself by its prior pro-Allied policy.
    [Show full text]