DOCSLIB.ORG

Housing Element of the General Plan (GPA 10-01)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Housing Element of the General Plan (GPA 10-01) EMERYVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Date: June 24, 2010 Report Date: June 18, 2010 TO: Emeryville Planning Commission FROM: Planning and Building Department SUBJECT: Housing Element of the General Plan (GPA 10-01) PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Consideration of revised Housing Element. Revisions include updated data and added information in response to the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) review comments. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: A Negative Declaration for the Housing Element was approved by the City Council on June 16, 2009; an Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan was certified by the City Council on October 13, 2009. APPLICABLE ZONING ORDINANCE PROVISION: Section 9-4.81 General Plan Amendment Procedure COMMISSION PROCEDURE: After taking public testimony, the Planning Commission may recommend or not recommend adoption of the Housing Element (a General Plan Amendment). If more information is required, the Planning Commission may continue the hearing. RECOMMENDED COMMISSION ACTION: 1. Open public hearing and take testimony regarding the 2009-2014 Housing Element 2. Close public hearing and consider the 2009-2014 Housing Element and Staff Report. 3. Adopt Resolution CPC No. GPA10-01 approving the 2006-2014 Housing Element and forwarding it to the City Council for adoption. Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report GPA 10-01 Housing Element June 24, 2010 Page 2 of 4 BACKGROUND: State law requires cities to revise the housing elements of their General Plans periodically to assess the needs and meet the demands for future housing. The Emeryville City Council adopted the City’s 2009-2014 Housing Element in June 2009 and submitted it to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (State HCD) for certification prior to the June 30, 2009 deadline for submittal. The State had 90 days to review the document and either grant certification or request further revisions. In September 2009, the City received a written response letter indicating that further revisions were necessary in order for the State to certify the Emeryville Housing Element. (The letter is included as Attachment B to this report.) Revisions have been made to the Element to meet HCD requirements. City staff met with the State HCD reviewer in November 2009 to discuss the comments and get a better understanding of what would be required as revisions to the document. In discussing options for the certification process, staff determined that it would be most effective to complete a revised draft version of the document for submittal to the State, and obtain the State’s written comments on this draft within 60 days. The State reviewer indicated that if the draft Housing Element submittal met the statutory requirements of State housing element law, State HCD would be able to provide the City a letter stating that the draft Housing Element meets the law and would be certifiable upon adoption and re-submittal to the State. Revisions were submitted and on May 24, 2010, State HCD provided a letter (Attachment C) indicating the City’s revised Housing Element will be in compliance with State Housing Element law when the revisions are adopted and submitted to the State. The Emeryville Housing Committee reviewed the Element at their June 2, 2010 meeting and approved its forwarding to the Planning Commission and City Council for adoption. DISCUSSION: Housing Element Revisions This report describes the revisions that have been made to the Emeryville Housing Element from the version adopted by the City Council in June 2009. Revisions were mainly made in Chapter 3, the Resources and Constraints chapter of the Housing Element, which includes the sites inventory and analysis section. Revisions were also made to Chapter 5, the Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs chapter, and Chapter 6, the Action Program. The appendices were also amended. These revisions are described below. The full 2009-2014 Housing Element and Appendices are included as Attachments E and F respectively. Chapter 2 Revisions: Table 2-55 (“Emeryville Housing Production 2006-2014”) was revised to match up with Table 3-2 in Chapter 3 (“Completed and Proposed Projects 2006-2014”) Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report GPA 10-01 Housing Element June 24, 2010 Page 3 of 4 Chapter 3 Revisions: Table 3-3 (“Tentative Sites”) was added back to the Housing Element. It was included in the 2008 draft version, but not included in the June 2009 version. The table was added back to demonstrate the City has adequate sites and zoning to meet the goals of the Regional Housing Need Allocation by income level. Table 3-3 includes descriptions of the affordability assumptions used for each of the six sites included in the table, and the redevelopment potential of the six sites. Table 3-5 (“Residential Development Standards”) was revised to reflect the new General Plan and Interim Zoning Ordinance. The text was updated throughout to reflect the recently adopted General Plan and Interim Zoning Ordinance. Additional text was provided about the City’s process to meet reasonable accommodation requests. Chapters 5 and 6 Revisions: Policy II-A-2 was revised regarding revising the Density Bonus Ordinance to be in compliance with State Density Bonus Law. Policy II-A-5 regarding incentives for the provision of extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income housing was removed and language was combined into Policy II-A-2. The Action Steps of Policy II-A-4 regarding the Affordable Housing Set Aside Ordinance were amended to add an action step around annually reviewing the Ordinance to consider its impacts on housing production and to make amendments to the Ordinance as necessary. The timing for completion of the Zoning Ordinance update was revised from the end of FY09/10 to the end of FY10/11 in several zoning-related policies (II-A-1; II-A-2; II-A-3; III-A-3; IV-A-1; IV-A-2; IV-A-3; IV-A-4; IV-A-5). Policy IV-A-4 was revised regarding revising the Zoning Ordinance to be in compliance with Senate Bill 2, to delete the phrase “by right” and substitute in the phrase “without a conditional use permit or other discretionary approval.” Policy IV-A-6 was added to revise the Zoning Ordinance to allow exemptions from design review for projects with negligible visual impact and reduce level of review to minor design review for one- and two-unit residential buildings. Policy IV-A-7 was added to indicate the City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to adopt the interim densities as identified in the sites inventory contained in the Housing Element pursuant to the General Plan Update. Appendices Revisions: The appendices were amended to add the reasonable accommodation request form, the new General Plan land use, Floor Area Ratio, and Building Heights maps, the new Planning and Building fee schedule, and the Agency Housing Compliance Plan adopted by the Agency in December 2009. Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report GPA 10-01 Housing Element June 24, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Environmental Review A Negative Declaration for the Housing Element was approved by the City Council on June 16, 2009 (Attachment D). An Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan was certified by the City Council on October 13, 2009. The proposed revisions to the Housing Element are consistent with the General Plan and present no new impacts that were not identified in either the Negative Declaration or the General Plan EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 no additional environmental review is necessary. Schedule for Adoption and Certification Below is the anticipated schedule for adoption and certification of the 2009-2014 Emeryville Housing Element: Planning Commission Review June 24, 2010 City Council Public Hearing and Adoption July 20, 2010 Submit to State HCD July 21, 2010 Certification by State HCD within 90 days No later than October 21, 2010 RECOMMENDED ACTION: After hearing public testimony, it is recommended that the Commission adopt Resolution CPC No. GPA10-01 (Attachment A) approving the 2006-2014 Housing Element and forward it to the City Council for adoption. Attachments: A. General Plan Amendment Resolution B. September 25, 2009 State HCD Letter C. May 24, 2010 State HCD Letter D. Initial Study/Negative Declaration E. 2009-2014 Emeryville Housing Element Document F. 2009-2014 Emeryville Housing Element Appendices* *Planning Commission only. Others may access this document at http://www.emeryville.org/econdev/housing-update.html. RESOLUTION CPC NO. GPA10-01 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE 2009-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, state law requires cities to revise the housing elements of their General Plans periodically; and Bay Area housing elements were due for submission to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by June 30, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Emeryville City Council adopted a new Housing Element on June 16, 2009 and submitted it to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for certification prior to the June 30, 2009 deadline for submittal; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2009 the City received a response letter from HCD indicating that revisions were necessary in order for the State to certify the Emeryville Housing Element; and WHEREAS, revisions have been made to the 2009-2014 Housing Element and, in a May 24, 2010 letter, HCD stated that the revised Element meets State law and will be certifiable upon adoption and resubmission;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3.1 Land Use & Housing
    3.1 Land Use and Housing This section presents the environmental setting and impact analysis on land use in the Emeryville General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING PHYSICAL SETTING Land Use Evolution Before the colonization of the area by Spain in 1776, the Emeryville area was the site of extensive Native American settlements. Mudflats rich with clams and rocky areas with oysters, plus fishing, hunting, and acorns from the local oak trees, provided a rich and easily exploited food source for the residents. They would dispose of their clam and oyster shells in a single place, over time creating a huge mound—the Emeryville Shellmound. After settlement by Europeans, Emeryville became a city in its own right, largely through the efforts of businessman Joseph S. Emery who started a stonework contracting business in San Francisco. In 1859, Emery purchased a 185-acre tract of land north of Oakland and began to develop projects in the area. A community began to develop around the Emery Tract, and the town of Emeryville was officially incorporated in 1896, taking the name of its founder. In 1871 Emery financed the construction of the San Pablo Avenue Horse Cart Railroad, which connected Oakland to Emeryville. He was also one of the primary builders of the California- Nevada Railroad, which began in Oakland, crossed the burgeoning Emery Tract, and terminated in Orinda. Emeryville soon became a city of big industrial enterprises and rail terminals. Successive years saw further consolidation of industry, including the paint factory of Sherwin- Williams and Shell Development, the research arm of Shell Oil Company.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2014 Progress Report ______
    CITY OF EMERYVILLE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sabrina Landreth, City Manager SUBJECT: Progress Report – October 2014 The following provides the City Council and staff with a summary of the activities of each department for the prior month. CITY MANAGER / CITY CLERK 1. On October 23rd, the City Manager’s Office hosted an event called, “Coffee with the City Manager”. The purpose of the event is to enable conversations with residents and businesses in Emeryville to discuss a topic of their choice. The events are open to all members of the public and will continue into 2015. 2. The City Clerk and City Manager’s Office continued to do non-partisan outreach throughout October around Emeryville’s HOA’s about Measure U & V. The League of Women’s Voters was a part of the outreach to inform the public about other ballot initiatives and to register voters. 3. 25 reports from the public were logged in through the Report a Concern link via the City’s Website. MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 22014 TO: Sabrina Landreth, City Manager FROM: Human Resources Department SUBJECT: October Progress Report HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 1. Labor Relations: The successor negotiations with the Emeryville Police Officers’ Association continued in September. There are currently no grievances. 2. Workers’ Compensation: There were four (4) ‘on-the-job’ injuries/incidents reported during the month of October. Two (2) were ‘Lost Time’ and two (2) were ‘Medical Only.’ As of September 30, 2014, the City/MESA had forty-four (44) open workers’ compensation claims (44 indemnity claims and 0 medical only claims).
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Political Will: a City-School Partnership and a Landscape of Redevelopment and Gentrification Hayin Kim, Ph.D
    BEYOND POLITICAL WILL: A CITY-SCHOOL PARTNERSHIP AND A LANDSCAPE OF REDEVELOPMENT AND GENTRIFICATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Hayin Kim June 2010 © 2010 by Hayin Kim. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/wf208kj8404 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Milbrey McLaughlin, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prudence Carter I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Debra Meyerson Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii Abstract Beyond political will: A city-school partnership and a landscape of redevelopment and gentrification Hayin Kim, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • E a St Shor E Pa R K Proj Ec T Gen Er a L Pl
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EASTSHORE PARK PROJECT GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2002022051 July 2002 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EASTSHORE PARK PROJECT GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2002022051 Gray Davis Governor Mary D. Nichols Secretary for Resources Ruth Coleman Acting Director of Parks and Recreation P.O.Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 July 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 A. PURPOSE OF THE EIR........................................................................................................ 1 B. PROPOSED PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 2 C. PLANNING PROCESS......................................................................................................... 4 D. EIR SCOPE............................................................................................................................ 5 E. SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 5 F. REPORT ORGANIZATION................................................................................................. 7 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................... 9 A. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Receive an Update on the Affordable Student Transit Pass Pilot Program
    Memorandum 8.2 DATE: September 15, 2016 SUBJECT: Affordable Student Transit Pass Pilot Program Update RECOMMENDATION: Receive an update on the Affordable Student Transit Pass Pilot Program. Summary The 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) includes implementation of an affordable student transit pass pilot program in Alameda County. Its purpose is to test and evaluate different pilot program designs of an affordable transit pass program over a three-year horizon to identify successful model programs that could be expanded and sustained with additional funding sources after the pilot program period. In May 2016, the Commission approved the school sites for Year One of the program (2016-2017 school year), general program parameters for each site, and the shortlist of 36 schools which is the potential pool for additional school sites in year 2 of the pilot program if feasible and if funding is available. During summer 2016, the program parameters were refined in close coordination with each school site to support an effective pilot approach to meet the program goals, and staff entered into agreements and contracts with the applicable transit agencies and school districts. Pilot programs were launched at the school sites in Alameda County that are receiving transit passes. Background The Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) has undertaken the development, implementation, and evaluation of an Affordable Student Transit Pass Program (Affordable STPP) which it is piloting in middle schools and high schools in the four Alameda County planning areas starting this 2016-2017 school year. This pilot program provides a vital opportunity to assess student transportation needs in the county and develop an approach to meet those needs through implementation of a pass program.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Emeryville Memorandum
    CITY OF EMERYVILLE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council (lr) FROM: Patrick D. O'Keeffe, City Manag~ SUBJECT: Progress Report -September 2008 The following provides the City Council and staff with a summary ofthe activities of each department for the prior month. CITY MANAGER • Staff is still working with the City of Oakland to develop a new library services agreement. Staff submitted a second proposal to Oakland in late September and expects a response sometime in October. • Staff has been working with the cities of Berkeley and Oakland to finalize the Community Choice Aggregation of Electrical Power (CCA) Phase II Report and develop a joint staff recommendation on whether the three cities should move ahead and establish a CCA program. Staff expects that the Phase II Report and staff recommendation will be released in October. The report and staff recommendations are scheduled to be reviewed and discussed at a special Utility Committee meeting on October 27. nd • The AC Transit/Emeryville Liaison Committee met on September 22 • At the meeting, AC Transit presented a proposal to establish a hydrogen fueling station at the AC Transit Bus Yard along 45th Street (below San Pablo Avenue). The Planning Commission will be reviewing the proposal in October, followed by a presentation to the full City Council in November. In addition, the Committee received an update on the City's Public Art Bus Shelter. Due to staff turnover at AC Transit, many of the other committee agenda item were tabled for later discussion. • The "2nd/4th Friday E-Bulletin, the City's new electronic newsletter was distributed on September 12 and 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Urban Redevelopment in Emeryville
    Growth and Urban Redevelopment in Emeryville East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy Center for Labor Research and Education University of California, Berkeley A Publication of the California Partnership for Working Families May 2003 Growth and Urban Redevelopment in Emeryville East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy Center for Labor Research and Education University of California, Berkeley Howard Greenwich Elizabeth Hinckle May 2003 A Publication of the California Partnership for Working Families East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy, Oakland, CA Center on Policy Initiatives, San Diego, CA Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy, CA Working Partnerships USA, San Jose, CA BEHIND THE BOOMTOWN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CREDITS This report was prepared by EBASE with the generous support of many individuals and organizations. We are indebted to the community members, workers, city representatives, and businesses of Emeryville for their time and insights into the transfor- mation of their city. We would like to thank: community members Angel Norris, Gladys Vance, Jim Martin, Barbara MacQuiddy, Gisele Wolf, Mary McGruder, Russell Moran, Bridget Burch, and Deloris Prince; store managers Al Kruger, Renee Conse, Sam Combs, Carlos Torres, and Chuck Pacioni; developers Pat Cashman, Shi-Tso Chen, Eric Hohmann, Glenn Isaacson, and Steven Meckfessel; businesspersons Bob Cantor and Jay Grover; current and former city staff members Ignacio Dayrit, Ron Gerber, Ellen Whitton, Pauline Marx, Karan Reid, Autumn Buss, Patrick O’Keeffe, Jeannie Wong, Wendy Silvani and Rebecca Atkinson; former City Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners Stu Flashman, Andy Getz and Greg Harper; current City Councilmembers Ruth Atkin and Nora Davis; and from the Emery Unified School District, State Administrator Henry Der and Advisory Board President Forrest Gee.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    A Year of Growth 2016–2017 Annual Report Board of Directors FROM OUR BOARD CHAIR & FOUNDER Stephen Seelbach, Chair Vista Equity Partners Dear SquashDrive Family and Friends, Andy Fremder, President East Bay College Fund Another year has flown by, and we are thrilled to share a snapshot Chris Sheldon, Treasurer of our accomplishments with you — our incredibly generous supporters Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and loyal fans! Robert Bingham Bingham, Osborn & Scarborough, LLC (Ret.) SquashDrive has expanded yet again to serve 72 students in 4th Maggie Bouscaren through 10th grades, including our first-ever student who was ClearRock Academic Squash accepted to boarding school at Eastside College Prep. Our diverse Leslie DeNino Crossroads Capital (Ret.) group of students worked hard in the classroom and on the squash support instruction James Ford court this past year. Vista Equity Partners Our team of devoted tutors focused on helping students make Will Fratt AN INTEGRATED Auberge Capital Management academic gains, and their average grades increased in all core subjects. PROGRAM Richard Hashim Students once again experienced STEM enrichment camps and a Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. guest speaker series led by volunteer professionals from STEM fields. Kevin Jernigan Highlights included trips to Google and the Oakland Aviation Museum. Amazon RDS We continued to enhance our College Prep Program, which Peter Lynch Urban Green Investments supplements regular academic sessions for our 9th and 10th graders, Lancelot Minor by touring eight colleges throughout the year and helping them VTS envision a path to college. For many of our students, college wasn’t Matt Price even a possibility until they joined SquashDrive, and now these same Activation Energy students are embracing the idea that this could be their future.
    [Show full text]
  • October 30, 2015 John Rubio, Superintendent
    LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CARLSBAD PALM SPRINGS SAN LUIS OBISPO 2215 FIFTH STREET 510.540.7331 TEL FORT COLLINS POINT RICHMOND SEATTLE BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94710 510.540.7344 FAX FRESNO RIVERSIDE IRVINE ROCKLIN October 30, 2015 John Rubio, Superintendent Emery Unified School District 1275 61st Street Emeryville, CA 94608 Subject: Sherwin-Williams Project Environmental Impact Report Dear Superintendent Rubio, LSA Associates, Inc. is currently working with the City of Emeryville to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Sherwin-Williams project and is seeking information from you about the potential impact of the project on the Emery Unified School District. The following includes a brief description of the proposed project. The attached Notice of Preparation (NOP) contains a map of the project site and other information about the project. Project Description The 10.05-acre project site is located within the City of Emeryville and in the County of Alameda. The site is generally bound by Horton Street to the east, Sherwin Avenue to the south, and Union Pacific Railroad tracks to the west. The future site of Horton Landing Park, owned by the City, is located immediately north of the project site, and a Novartis surface parking lot, the so-called “Rifkin Lot,” is located immediately to the northeast. Temescal Creek runs near the northern boundary of the site. The project site includes two parcels: one owned by Sherwin-Williams (8.59 acres) and one owned by the City of Emeryville as Successor Agency to the Emeryville Redevelopment Agency (1.46 acres). The proposed project would divide the project site into new parcels and roadways and construct a mixed-used development.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA City/School Committee October 11
    PLEASE POST City/School Committee Councilmember Jac Asher, Co-Chair School Board Member Joshua Simon, Co-Chair Councilmember Jennifer West Councilmember Ruth Atkin, Councilmember Kurt Brinkman Councilmember Nora Davis School Board Member John Affeldt School Board Member Joy Kent School Board Member Melodi Dice School Board Member Miguel Dwin Student Member Jordan Taylor Student Member VACANT AGENDA City/School Committee Regular Meeting of the Advisory Committee Special Meeting of the Emeryville City Council and Emery Unified School District Board of Trustees October 11, 2012, 5:30 pm (rescheduled from October 4, 2012) Ralph Hawley School 1275 61st Street All Advisory Committee meetings are noticed as Special City Council and School District Board of Trustees Meetings so that any or all of the City Council or School District Board of Trustees may attend and participate in the Advisory Committee’s deliberations. However, actions taken by Advisory Committees are not official actions of the City Council and School District Board of Trustees but must be ratified at a regular City Council and School District Board of Trustees Meeting. All writings that are public records and relate to an agenda item below which are distributed to a majority of the City/School Committee (including writings distributed to a majority of the City/School Committee less than 72 hours prior to the meeting noticed below) will be available at the Information Counter, 1333 Park Avenue, Emeryville, California during normal business hours (9am to 5pm, Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). I. Roll Call II. Public Comment III. Approval of 9/6/12 Minutes IV.
    [Show full text]
  • $1,300,000 Emery Unified School District (Alameda County, California) General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2010, Series 2017 F
    NEW ISSUE - FULL BOOK-ENTRY RATING: Moody's: "Aa3" See "RATING" herein. In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel, subject, however to certain qualifications described in this Official Statement, under existing law, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and such interest is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, although for the purpose of computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations, interest on the Bonds is taken into account in determining certain income and earnings. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is exempt from California personal income taxes. See "TAX MATTERS." $1,300,000 $27,085,000 EMERY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EMERY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Alameda County, California) (Alameda County, California) General Obligation Bonds 2017 General Obligation Refunding Bonds Election of 2010, Series 2017 F Dated: Date of Delivery Due: August 1, as shown on inside front cover Authority and Purpose. The above captioned General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2010, Series 2017 F (the "Series F Bonds") and the 2017 General Obligation Refunding Bonds (the "Refunding Bonds" and, together with the Series F Bonds, the "Bonds') are being issued by the Emery Unified School District (the "District") pursuant to certain provisions of the California Government Code and resolutions of the Board of Trustees of the District adopted on May 25, 2017 (together, the "Bond Resolutions"). The Series F Bonds were authorized at an election of the registered voters of the District held on November 2, 2010, which authorized the issuance of $95,000,000 principal amount of general obligation bonds for the purpose of financing the replacement and upgrading of school facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Title VI Fare Equity Analysis for Discontinuing the BART Discounted Orange Ticket Program for Students at Participating Middle and High Schools
    Title VI Fare Equity Analysis for Discontinuing the BART Discounted Orange Ticket Program for Students at Participating Middle and High Schools Prepared by: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Office of Civil Rights June 14, 2018 Table of Contents I. Title VI Fare Equity Analysis Executive Summary Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Minority Disparate Impact & Low Income Disproportionate Burden Analysis Section 3: Public Participation Section 4: Equity Findings for Discontinuing Orange Ticket II. Public Participation Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To ensure compliance with federal and state civil rights regulations, including but not limited to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and FTA Circular 4702.1B [dated October 1, 2012 (Circular)], BART must perform an analysis of any fare or fare media change to determine if the change has a disparate impact on minority riders or a disproportionate burden on low-income riders. In accordance with the Circular, BART makes this determination by comparing the analysis results against a threshold, as defined in its Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden Policy. The fare change discussed in this report is the discontinuation of the BART Orange magnetic stripe ticket, which is a fare type. The Orange ticket is sold at participating middle and high schools at a 50% discount; students pay $16 and receive $32 in BART value. The Orange ticket program has been in effect since the late 1990s in order to provide students a discount on school-related trips they make during the week and currently has 147 participating schools. FTA-approved methodology has been used to access the effects of a fare type change; draws on data from BART ridership surveys and BART automated fare collection equipment; and includes public outreach undertaken in accordance with BART’s Public Participation Plan to receive public input on discontinuing the BART Plus ticket from low-income, minority, and limited-English-proficient (LEP) riders.
    [Show full text]