Final Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT (2016-2018) - ANNEXES OUPUT 01: COMMUNITY-BASED DISASTER RISK REDUCTION “Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation into Local Development Planning in Zimbabwe” Project Public Disclosure Authorized A02-1.1.1a VCA / CCA ToT Report (May 2016) A02-1.1.1b Kariba Rural District Climate Change Risk Profile (June 2016) A02-1.2.1a Participatory Disaster & Climate Risk Assessment Report (2016) A02-1.2.1b VCA Refresher Training and Consolidated VCA Update Report (2017) A02-1.2.3 Community Reflection on Updated VCA Results (July 2017) A02-1.3.1 Consolidated and Updated CDRAPs and sample CDRAPs (2016 & 2017) A02-1.4.1 CDRAP & Micro-project Proposal Writing Training Report 2017 A02-1.4.3a DRR Micro-Projects 2016/17 & 2017/18 Summary Report Public Disclosure Authorized A02-1.4.3b Non-structural DRR/CCA Measures 2016/17 & 2017/18 – Health & Hygiene A02-1.4.3c Non-structural DRR/CCA Measures 2016/17 & 2017/18 – Others Public Disclosure Authorized These activities were co-financed by the EU-funded ACP-EU Natural Disaster Risk Reduction Program, managed by the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery WB/GFDRR: A02 OUTPUT 01 ANNEXES VULNERABILITY CAPACITY ASSESSMENT (VCA) TRAINER OF TRAINERS (ToT) TRAINING REPORT (Activity 1.1.1) “Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation into Local Development Planning in Zimbabwe” Project VENUE 2-days KARIBA URBAN & DATES: followed by 3-days KARIBA RURAL (Siakobvu) 22 – 28 MAY 2016 INTRODUCTION In fulfilment of outcome 2 of the project, Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction, Vulnerability Capacity Assessment (VCA) Trainer of Trainers (ToT) training was conducted in Kariba urban and rural from the 22nd - 28th May 2016. The VCA ToT training was crucial in equipping the TOTs with necessary skills needed to cascade the VCA process to field VCA participants and to community members. The training of ToTs targeted ZRCS field team members, the Nyaminyami Social Services Officer, a representative from the District Administrator’s office and Ministry of Health, Red Cross volunteers, Red Cross staff and ward-based Environmental Health Technicians (EHTs). This ensured that capacity of the ZRCS to effectively and sustainably implement community-based DRR in the local targeted wards was enhanced. The training was facilitated by the Disaster Management Officer and the Planning Monitoring Evaluation and Reporting (PMER) Officer. In total 15 participants: 4 female & 11 male. The Training Process • The first 2 (two) days of training was theory based in-class training which was done in Kariba urban to cater for Kariba urban stakeholders while the 3 days that followed was practical session. • The main material used for the training was a revised harmonised VCA manual developed in consultations with other ZRCS programmes as well as input from DRC • The training content was on: what a VCA is? Why we do VCA, the 3 major VCA assessments, the responsibilities of a VCA team, the VCA tools which were to be used, the elements at risk and the process of VCA itself. • The analysis of elements at risk were grouped into 6 and 2 people were allocated to administer the different tools under these thematic areas. The tools used include Community Hazard risk mapping, Seasonal calendar and Venn diagrams to gather information on six elements at risk WB/GFDRR: A02-1.1.1 VCA ToT Training Report (May 2016) 1 which are social, economic, individual (male and female), physical and natural. Community risk mapping was used to gather information on natural and physical elements at risk, seasonal calendar was used to collect data on the economic, individual male and female elements at risk and Venn diagram was used to collect information on social whereby information collected involved issues which connect people together as a community and issues which divide the community. The physical group was also assigned to complete community profile • The 5th day was community VCA practical day were VCA tools were used to collect information from the targeted communities. The field practical exercise was done in Nebiri Maya cluster with the ToTs leading. • The 6th day was report writing day. The six groups compiled information which was gathered through the use of various tools into once consolidated cluster report in this case Nebiri Maya VCA Cluster report. Figure 1: TOT presenting their group findings COMMENTS ▪ Time management was good as people started and finished the process within a relatively reasonable time. However, there is need to further speed the process by ensuring right probing and avoidance of off topic responses. ▪ It was difficult to get the difference between hazards and problems from the communities (despite the definitions having been explained to them) as they would present the problems and the root causes of the hazards. Hence it was agreed by the group that continuously reminding the communities on what a hazard or disaster is, would assist. ▪ Facilitation skills by the ToTs still need further strengthening especially when doing the hazard profile. ▪ It was also noted that there was need for the small groups to wait for each other if they have completed their activity so that the community members would not distract others once they have been dismissed when others are still in session. ▪ Community participation in the process was very high, but in future better crowd control methods need to be exercised so as not to waste time. It was noted that the good attendance was due to the fact that they were getting some refreshments. ▪ It was also noted if the process is not dispensed quickly the communities become impatient and this would have a negative effect on the quality of data collected. WB/GFDRR: A02-1.1.1 VCA ToT Training Report (May 2016) 2 EVALUATION OF THE TOT TRAINING. ZRCS PMER conducted Pre- and Post-Test regarding participants understanding of VCA. A pre- and post-test was written by the TOTs and the results are as tabulated below: Figure 1: Pre and Post test results 120 100 80 60 40 Marks (%) Marks 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Participant pre and post test Figure 2 above shows a great improvement on VCA participant’s knowledge with more than half of the participants scoring above 80. Figure 2: Overall rating for the training 60% 43% 47% 40% 9% 20% 1% 0% Excellent Good Average Poor The training evaluation results in Figure 3 above show that 43% rated the training as excellent whilst 47% said it was good whilst 1% rated it as poor. This activity was co-financed by the EU-funded ACP-EU Natural Disaster Risk Reduction Program, managed by the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery WB/GFDRR: A02-1.1.1 VCA ToT Training Report (May 2016) 3 Kariba District Climate Change Risk Profiling Report Prepared by Elisha N. Moyo; Dorah Mwenye and Charlene Makuzha Climate Change Management Department Ministry of Environment, Water and Climate for the “Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation into Local Development Planning in Zimbabwe” Project of the Zimbabwe Red Cross Society Table of content Table of content ......................................................................................................................1 Table of figures and tables .......................................................................................................2 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................4 Abbreviations and acronyms ...................................................................................................5 1. Introduction and Background ........................................................................................6 2. Assessment approach and methodology ........................................................................8 3. Ethical issues and community participation ...................................................................9 4. Observed climate change hazards and impacts ............................................................ 10 4.1 Community perceptions on climate change risks from the FGDs ................................................................... 10 4.2 Major hazards and impacts on upland livelihoods for Negande, Nebiri and Mola ......................................... 11 4.3 Major hazards and impacts on bank livelihoods for M’Sampa fishing camp .................................................. 13 5. Community resource maps indicating changes in livelihoods assets. ............................ 14 5.1 Resource maps for M’Sampa Fishing Camp - The Past and Present ............................................................... 14 5.2 Visioning: the future for Nebiri ward 7 and M’Sampa fishing camp ward 3 ................................................... 14 6. Community Challenges and Opportunities ................................................................... 15 6.1 Community challenges .................................................................................................................................... 15 6.2 Community opportunities ............................................................................................................................... 16 6.3 Livelihoods options and their gender disaggregation ....................................................................................