DOCSLIB.ORG

Polycentric Information Commons: a Theory Development and Empirical Investigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University CEPRIN Dissertations Center for Process Innovation Fall 12-10-2018 Polycentric Information Commons: A Theory Development and Empirical Investigation Vitali Mindel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/ceprin_diss Recommended Citation Mindel, Vitali, "Polycentric Information Commons: A Theory Development and Empirical Investigation." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2018. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/ceprin_diss/5 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Process Innovation at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in CEPRIN Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Polycentric Information Commons: A Theory Development and Empirical Investigation By VITALI MINDEL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE ROBINSON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS OF GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY ROBINSON COLLEGE OF BUSINESS 2018 Polycentric Information Commons V. Mindel 2018 Copyright by Vitali Mindel 2018 2 Polycentric Information Commons V. Mindel 2018 ACCEPTANCE This dissertation was prepared under the direction of the Vitali Mindel Dissertation Committee. It has been approved and accepted by all members of that committee, and it has been accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Business Administration in the J. Mack Robinson College of Business of Georgia State University. Richard Phillips, Dean DISSERTATION COMMITTEE Chair: Dr. Lars Mathiassen (Center for Process Innovation & Computer Information Systems Department, Georgia State University) Chair: Dr. Arun Rai (Center for Process Innovation & Computer Information Systems Department, Georgia State University) Dr. Likoebe Maruping (Center for Process Innovation & Computer Information Systems Department, Georgia State University) Dr. Brian Butler (College of Information Studies, University of Maryland) 3 Polycentric Information Commons V. Mindel 2018 ABSTRACT Polycentric Information Commons: A Theory Development and Empirical Investigation BY VITALI MINDEL 11/26/2018 Committee Chair: Lars Mathiassen & Arun Rai Major Academic Unit: Center for Process Innovation & Computer Information Systems Decentralized systems online—such as open source software (OSS) development, online communities, wikis, and social media—often experience decline in participation which threatens their long-terms sustainability. Building on a rich body of research on the sustainability of physical resource systems, this dissertation presents a novel theoretical framing that addresses the sustainability issues arising in decentralized systems online and which are amplified because of their open nature. The first essay develops the theory of polycentric information commons (PIC) which conceptualizes decentralized systems online as “information commons”. The theory defines information commons, the stakeholders that participate in them, the sustainability indicators of information commons and the collective-action threats putting pressure on their long-term sustainability. Drawing on Ostrom’s factors associated with stable common pool resource systems, PIC theory specifies four polycentric governance practices that can help information commons reduce the magnitude and impact of collective-action threats while improving the information commons’ sustainability. The second essay further develops PIC theory by applying it in an empirical context of “digital activism”. Specifically, it examines the role of polycentric governance in reducing the threats to the legitimacy of digital activism—a type of information commons with an overarching objective of instigating societal change. As such, it illustrates the applicability of PIC theory in the study of digital activism. The third essay focuses on the threat of “information pollution” and its impact on open collaboration, a type of information commons dedicated to the creation of value through open participation online. It uncovers the way polycentric governance mechanism help reduce the duration of pollution events. This essay contributes to PIC theory by expanding it to the realm of operational governance in open collaboration. 4 Polycentric Information Commons V. Mindel 2018 Acknowledgments As corny as it may seem, I would like first and foremost to acknowledge the American Dream. I came to this country in 2007 and had to start from the bottom. For almost two years, I worked as a housekeeping aid in a hospital in Springfield, Illinois, cleaning surgery rooms for minimum wage on the evening shift while taking classes at the local community college during the day. I then moved to Atlanta, where I worked as a daytime groundskeeper in an apartment complex for three years, cleaning the pool and hallways. After taking a year off of my education to avoid paying out- of-state tuition, I began taking evening classes and completed my bachelor’s degree at Georgia State University. To this day, when I see housekeepers in office buildings pushing carts equipped with spray bottles, paper towels, mop buckets, and other cleaning supplies, I get emotional. I pushed one of those carts for almost five years. Now, on my way to be a college professor in one of the premier higher education institutions in the land, I feel extremely fortunate and grateful to all the experiences and people that helped and inspired me along the way. I want to thank Hanny, my mentor in the housekeeping department at Memorial Hospital in Springfield. For some reason, she took me under her wings, making sure I got the “easier” assignments so that I had extra time to do my college class work. I want to thank the crew at the hospital’s Cath-Lab for being nice to me and being understanding of my slacking while I was buried in textbooks. I want to thank Dr. Ellen Watkins, my sociology professor at Lincoln Land Community College (LLCC), for not laughing at me when I told her that I wanted to become a college professor. She and other professors I encountered in LLCC—especially Dr. Mark Roehrs and Dr. John Vinzant—were all very encouraging. The quality of courses at LLCC was the best I have experienced in my long journey as a student, and though I did not receive my degree there, I still regard LLCC as my alma mater. I want to thank Cedrick, the maintenance 5 Polycentric Information Commons V. Mindel 2018 manager in the Atlanta apartment complex where I worked, for turning a blind eye when I was often doing homework instead of my job. All of these people noticed the drive in me and implicitly and explicitly supported my efforts. I thank you all for that. I want to thank Dr. Jeannie Grussendorf, who was my favorite professor at Georgia State University and who’s teaching style inspires me now when designing my own classes. She was the one who told me about the internship opportunity with the World Affairs Council of Atlanta (WACA), and who connected me to the right people and wrote my recommendation letter. I would like to thank Dr. Wayne Lord, the president of WACA at the time, for hiring me as his assistant and introducing me to Dr. Lars Mathiassen, the academic director of Georgia State University’s Executive Doctorate Program, which shared office space with WACA. Without this introduction, I would not be writing these acknowledgments. This brings me to Lars, my advisor and mentor. No words of gratitude can express how I feel about this man. I know for sure that I owe EVERYTHING to him. Before meeting Lars, I applied for dozens of jobs and graduate programs, thinking that graduating at the top of my class would help get my foot in the door. I was wrong; almost everyone shut the door on me. For some reason that is not entirely clear to me to this day, Lars took a chance on me, giving me the opportunity I needed to advance from cleaning floors to having a fulfilling life. I had no master’s degree, no background in the discipline, and no industry experience, and still this man saw something in me. Working with Lars was incredible, and I will cherish this for the rest of my career. Thank you for taking the chance on me, Lars. Hope you don’t regret it. Over the five years we spent together, I learned so much from you—the most important thing being that successful academic pursuit is not only about doing research, but also about cultivating friendships and relationships. I am truly inspired by the way in which you treat everyone you encounter with respect and genuine friendliness. 6 Polycentric Information Commons V. Mindel 2018 I know that Lars would not have admitted me to the program without the blessing of his close colleague, Dr. Arun Rai. Having worked mostly with Lars, I was at first intimidated by Arun. Not because of his status in the field (which I was unaware of) but because he seemed to be fiercely brilliant, intense, and unabashedly confident. I kept my distance for a while, but over time I was very happy to discover the true Arun Rai—brilliant, intense, and confident, yes, but also very much an outstanding human being who deeply cares about others. One should see the sparkle in his eyes when he talks about his students and other young aspiring academics! I learned a lot from working with Arun, including the importance of seeking constant inspiration and cultivating your passion for the academic pursuit. It is a little funny to me now to acknowledge how clueless I was when I started the program, with no idea who Arun Rai or Lars Mathiassen were; it was only after a while into the PhD program that I was pleasantly surprised to learn that I was being mentored by some of the most esteemed scholars in the IS field. It was a little like realizing that, after years jamming with Paul and John, I was actually making music with the Beatles.
Recommended publications
  • Saving the Information Commons a New Public Intere S T Agenda in Digital Media

    Saving the Information Commons a New Public Intere S T Agenda in Digital Media

    Saving the Information Commons A New Public Intere s t Agenda in Digital Media By David Bollier and Tim Watts NEW AMERICA FOUNDA T I O N PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE Saving the Information Commons A Public Intere s t Agenda in Digital Media By David Bollier and Tim Watts Washington, DC Ack n owl e d g m e n t s This report required the support and collaboration of many people. It is our pleasure to acknowledge their generous advice, encouragement, financial support and friendship. Recognizing the value of the “information commons” as a new paradigm in public policy, the Ford Foundation generously supported New America Foundation’s Public Assets Program, which was the incubator for this report. We are grateful to Gigi Sohn for helping us develop this new line of analysis and advocacy. We also wish to thank The Open Society Institute for its important support of this work at the New America Foundation, and the Center for the Public Domain for its valuable role in helping Public Knowledge in this area. Within the New America Foundation, Michael Calabrese was an attentive, helpful colleague, pointing us to useful literature and knowledgeable experts. A special thanks to him for improv- ing the rigor of this report. We are also grateful to Steve Clemons and Ted Halstead of the New America Foundation for their role in launching the Information Commons Project. Our research and writing of this report owes a great deal to a network of friends and allies in diverse realms. For their expert advice, we would like to thank Yochai Benkler, Jeff Chester, Rob Courtney, Henry Geller, Lawrence Grossman, Reed Hundt, Benn Kobb, David Lange, Jessica Litman, Eben Moglen, John Morris, Laurie Racine and Carrie Russell.
  • Hacking Politics How Geeks, Progressives, the Tea Party, Gamers, Anarchists and Suits Teamed up to Defeat SOPA and Save the Internet

    Hacking Politics How Geeks, Progressives, the Tea Party, Gamers, Anarchists and Suits Teamed up to Defeat SOPA and Save the Internet

    Hacking Politics How Geeks, Progressives, the Tea Party, Gamers, Anarchists and Suits Teamed Up to Defeat SOPA and Save the Internet EDITED BY DAVID MOON, PATRICK RUFFINI, AND DAVID SEGAL Hacking Politics THE ULTIMATE DOCUMENTATION OF THE ULTIMATE INTERNET KNOCK-DOWN BATTLE! Hacking Politics From Aaron to Zoe—they’re here, detailing what the SOPA/PIPA battle was like, sharing their insights, advice, and personal observations. Hacking How Geeks, Politics includes original contributions by Aaron Swartz, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, Lawrence Lessig, Rep. Ron Paul, Reddit’s Alexis Ohanian, Cory Doctorow, Kim Dotcom and many other technologists, activists, and artists. Progressives, Hacking Politics is the most comprehensive work to date about the SOPA protests and the glorious defeat of that legislation. Here are reflections on why and how the effort worked, but also a blow-by-blow the Tea Party, account of the battle against Washington, Hollywood, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that led to the demise of SOPA and PIPA. Gamers, Anarchists DAVID MOON, former COO of the election reform group FairVote, is an attorney and program director for the million-member progressive Internet organization Demand Progress. Moon, Moon, and Suits Teamed Up PATRICK RUFFINI is founder and president at Engage, a leading digital firm in Washington, D.C. During the SOPA fight, he founded “Don’t Censor the to Defeat SOPA and Net” to defeat governmental threats to Internet freedom. Prior to starting Engage, Ruffini led digital campaigns for the Republican Party. Ruffini, Save the Internet DAVID SEGAL, executive director of Demand Progress, is a former Rhode Island state representative.
  • Info Commons Development Task Force

    Info Commons Development Task Force

    Information Commons Development Task Force 2008 Recommendations For the Development of the Information Commons Services and Facilities At the University at Albany 2008 – 2010 By the Information Commons Development Task Force Greg Bobish, Jane Kessler, Chris Moore, Lorre Smith, Laura Ryan, and Robert Wachs March 10, 2008 1 Information Commons Development Task Force 2008 Introduction The Task Force charge is to provide ideas for development of the current Information Commons (IC) to allow evolution to the next generation. The Task Force was asked not to be overly constrained by resource limitations, but to provide ideas that may be used by the University Libraries and Information Technology Services to develop facilities, staff and services. The Task Force was encouraged to develop an expanded concept for the IC. The Task Force decided to look at IC‐related web pages at our peer institutions as well as look at additional Information and Learning Commons that featured services and facilities that were innovative. We used the InfoCommons‐L electronic discussion list to find IC sites and discover ideas through those discussions at the international level. We used survey data gathered from users in the University Libraries by the Reference Assessment Librarian during the fall of 2007. We also met with IC staff and asked them to tell us from their experiences what were successful services, what the users indicated that they liked, what problems users were having, and what they requested often that we are not currently offering. We searched the growing body of literature about Information Commons and Learning Commons and drew philosophical and pragmatic ideas from our results.
  • Information Commons: Models for Eliteracy and the Integration of Learning

    Information Commons: Models for Eliteracy and the Integration of Learning

    Information Commons: Models for eLiteracy and the Integration of Learning Susan Beatty and Peggy White, University of Calgary Abstract Information Commons are often described as integrated learning facilities, where the user can receive assistance in acquiring information literacy skills and/or technical literacy skills or “e-lit skills”. User acquisition of e-lit skills that support further learning is a desirable goal. Information Commons in academic libraries are designed to facilitate this learning goal, often through an integrated and collaborative service model. What are the models of integrated service delivery for Information Commons in academic libraries? Are there models which have been more effective in fostering the learning of e-lit skills and if so, how? This paper will describe the results of an environmental scan of some of the most successful Information Commons in North America and elsewhere, focusing on the elements of their service and program model that in the authors’ opinion foster e-lit integration. Keywords: Information Commons, e-literacy, learning, university, library Journal of eLiteracy, Vol 2 (2005) 2-14 2 1. Introduction Information Commons are a new type of library facility offering innovative services that facilitate student learning. This paper presents an environmental scan of Information Commons in universities and identifies service and program models that support e- literacy. It examines to what extent instruction and services, supporting formal and informal learning, are offered for technology and information searching, that is e-literacy. It seeks to identify which models of Information Commons best meet this objective and suggest areas for further research. 2. Background During the 1990’s and continuing through the present day, a new type of service facility has begun to appear in academic libraries across North America, Europe, and elsewhere.
  • Weeklies with Local Cartoons Are 'Truly Blessed'

    Weeklies with Local Cartoons Are 'Truly Blessed'

    Weeklies with local cartoons are ‘truly blessed’ By Marcia Martinek . Pages 1-3 Funding of journalism remains the Holy Grail By Anthony Longden . Pages 4-6 Fighting spirit: Competing hyperlocal sites outmatch regional newspaper’s community coverage By Barbara Selvin . Page 7-11 Extension journalism: Teaching students the real world and bringing a new type of journalism to a small town By Al Cross . Pages 12-18 Shared views: Social capital, community ties and Instagram By Leslie-Jean Thornton . Page 19-26 The EMT of multimedia: How to revive your newspaper’s future By Teri Finneman . Pages 27-32 volume 54, no. 3-4 • fall/winter 2013 grassroots editor • fall-winter 2013 Weeklies with local Editor: Dr. Chad Stebbins Graphic Designer: Liz Ford Grassroots Editor cartoons are ‘truly blessed’ (USPS 227-040, ISSN 0017-3541) is published quarterly for $25 per year by By Marcia Martinek the International Society of Weekly Newspaper Editors, Institute of International Studies, Missouri Southern When an 8-year-old girl saw an illustration in the Altamont (New York) Enterprise depict- State University, 3950 East Newman Road, ing her church, which was being closed by the Albany Diocese, she became upset. Forest Byrd, Joplin, MO 64801-1595. Periodicals post- then the illustrator for the newspaper, had drawn the church with a tilting steeple, being age paid at Joplin, Mo., and at strangled with vines as a symbol of what was happening in the diocese. additional mailing offices. The girl wrote to the newspaper, and Editor Melissa Hale-Spencer responded to her, explaining the role of cartoons in a newspaper along with affirming the girl’s action in writing POSTMASTER: Send address changes the letter.
  • Review of Service Composition Interfaces

    Review of Service Composition Interfaces

    Sanna Kotkaluoto, Juha Leino, Antti Oulasvirta, Peter Peltonen, Kari‐Jouko Räihä and Seppo Törmä Review of Service Composition Interfaces DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE D‐2009‐7 TAMPERE 2009 UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCES SERIES OF PUBLICATIONS D – NET PUBLICATIONS D‐2009‐7, OCTOBER 2009 Sanna Kotkaluoto, Juha Leino, Antti Oulasvirta, Peter Peltonen, Kari‐Jouko Räihä and Seppo Törmä Review of Service Composition Interfaces DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCES FIN‐33014 UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE ISBN 978‐951‐44‐7896‐3 ISSN 1795‐4274 Preface This report was produced in the LUCRE project. LUCRE stands for Local and User-Created Services. The project is part of the Flexible Services research programme, one of the programmes of the Strategic Centre for Science, Technology and Innovation in the ICT field (TIVIT) and funded by Tekes (the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation) and the participating organizations. The Flexible Service Programme creates service business activity for global markets. The programme has the aim of creating a Web of Services. The programme creates new types of ecosystems, in which the producers of services, the people that convey the service and the users all work together in unison. As part of such ecosystems, LUCRE will develop an easy-to-use, visual service creation platform to support the creation of context aware mobile services. The goal is to support user-driven open innovation: the end- users (people, local businesses, communities) will be provided with tools to compose new services or to modify existing ones. The service creation platform will build on the technology of existing mashup tools, widget frameworks, and publish/subscribe mechanisms.
  • PANAHI-.Pdf (1.237Mb)

    PANAHI-.Pdf (1.237Mb)

    © Copyright by Hesam Panahi, 2010 USER-GENERATED CONTENT AND REVOLUTIONS: TOWARDS A THEORIZATION OF WEB 2.0 A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the C.T. Bauer College of Business University of Houston In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Hesam Panahi December, 2010 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Dissertationʼs Research Objective ..................................................................... 2 Dissertationʼs Research Methodology ................................................................ 3 References ......................................................................................................... 5 Paper One: A Critical Study of Social Computing and Web 2.0: The Case of Digg ............................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 Theoretical Background ..................................................................................... 9 Critical Studies of IS ....................................................................................... 9 A Critical Framework for Studying Social Computing ................................... 10 Research Methods ........................................................................................... 15 Why an Interpretive Approach .....................................................................
  • Information Commons

    Information Commons

    Please do not remove this page Information Commons Kranich, Nancy; Schement, Jorge Reina https://scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu/discovery/delivery/01RUT_INST:ResearchRepository/12643403850004646?l#13643526980004646 Kranich, N., & Schement, J. R. (2008). Information Commons. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 42, Issue 1, pp. 547–591). Rutgers University. https://doi.org/10.7282/T3KW5JBB This work is protected by copyright. You are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, for research and educational purposes. Other uses, such as reproduction or publication, may require the permission of the copyright holder. Downloaded On 2021/09/25 21:16:40 -0400 Information Commons 1 Information Commons Nancy Kranich Consultant Jorge Schement Pennsylvania State University Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) Chapter 12: 547-591. ABSTRACT This chapter reviews the history and theory of information commons along with the various conceptual approaches used to describe and understand them. It also discusses governance, financing, and participation in these commons. Today’s digital technologies offer unprecedented possibilities for human creativity, global communication, innovation, and access to information. Yet these same technologies also provide new opportunities to control—or enclose—intellectual products, thereby threatening to erode political Information Commons 2 discourse, scientific inquiry, free speech, and the creativity needed for a healthy democracy. Advocates for an open information society face an uphill battle to influence outcomes in the policy arena; yet they are developing information commons that advance innovation, stimulate creativity, and promote the sharing of information resources. Designers of these new information resources can learn from those who have studied other commons like forests and fisheries.
  • Peer Production: a Form of Collective Intelligence.” in Hand- Book of Collective Intelligence, Edited by Thomas Malone and Michael Bernstein

    Peer Production: a Form of Collective Intelligence.” in Hand- Book of Collective Intelligence, Edited by Thomas Malone and Michael Bernstein

    THIS IS A PRE-PRINT VERSION OF PUBLISHED BOOK CHAPTER.THE FINAL VERSION AND THE REFERENCE TO USE WHEN CITING THIS WORK IS: Benkler, Yochai, Aaron Shaw, and Benjamin Mako Hill. (2015) “Peer Production: A Form of Collective Intelligence.” In Hand- book of Collective Intelligence, edited by Thomas Malone and Michael Bernstein. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Peer Production: A Form of Collective Intelligence Yochai Benkler ([email protected]) HARVARD UNIVERSITY Aaron Shaw ([email protected]) NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Benjamin Mako Hill ([email protected]) UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION Wikipedia has mobilized a collective of millions to produce an enormous, high quality, encyclopedia without traditional forms of hierarchical organiza- tion or financial incentives. More than any other twenty-first century collab- orative endeavor, Wikipedia has attracted the attention of scholars in the so- cial sciences and law both as an example of what collective intelligence makes possible and as an empirical puzzle. Conventional thinking suggests that ef- fective and successful organizations succeed through hierarchical control and management, but Wikipedia seems to organize collectively without either. Legal and economic common sense dictates that compensation and contracts are necessary for individuals to share the valuable products of their work, yet Wikipedia elicits millions of contributions without payment or owner- ship. Intuition suggests that hobbyists, volunteers, and rag-tag groups will not Parts of this chapter build upon work published in: Y. Benkler, Peer. “Production and Cooperation” forthcoming in J. M. Bauer & M. Latzer (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, Cheltenham and Northampton, Edward Elgar. 1 2 be able to create information goods of sufficient quality to undermine pro- fessional production, but contributors to Wikipedia have done exactly this.
  • Information Commons - a Public Policy Report - by Nancy Kranich

    Information Commons - a Public Policy Report - by Nancy Kranich

    - the - Information Commons - a public policy report - by Nancy Kranich THE FREE EXPRESSION POLICY PROJECT BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE at NYU SCHOOL OF LAW e Information Commons: A Public Policy Report © 2004. is report is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial” license; see http://creativecommons.org. It may be reproduced in its entirety as long as the Brennan Center for Justice, Free Expression Policy Project is credited, a link to the Project’s Web page is provided, and no charge is imposed. e report may not be reproduced in part or in altered form, or if a fee is charged, without our permission. Please let us know if you reprint. BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE at NYU SCHOOL OF LAW Democracy Program, Free Expression Policy Project 161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th floor New York NY 10013 Phone: (212) 998-6730 Web site: www.brennancenter.org Free Expression Policy Project: www.fepproject.org Author of the report: Nancy Kranich, Senior Research Fellow, Free Expression Policy Project, 2003-04 Editing: Marjorie Heins, Director, Free Expression Policy Project, 2000-04 Design: Jon Hecht table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................ INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... I. OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF THE INFORMATION AGE.. Evolution of the Information Society................................................................... e Promise of the Internet and
  • Understanding Knowledge As a Commons

    Understanding Knowledge As a Commons

    4626_Hess 11/3/06 7:18 AM Page 1 U a communications/scholarly publishing s n Understanding Knowledge as a Commons d a e From Theory to Practice C r s o t m edited by Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom a n m d Charlotte Hess is Director of the Digital Library of the Commons at o i n n Indiana University. Elinor Ostrom is Arthur F. Bentley Professor of g s Understanding Knowledge Political Science, Codirector of the Workshop in Political Theory and K n Policy Analysis at Indiana University, and Codirector of the Center for H e o the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC) s as a Commons Knowledge in digital form offers unprecedented access to information w s at Indiana University. a l through the Internet but at the same time is subject to ever-greater n e d d restrictions through intellectual property legislation, overpatenting, From Theory to Practice O g s licensing, overpricing, and lack of preservation. Looking at knowledge e t r o as a commons—as a shared resource—allows us to understand both m its limitless possibilities and what threatens it. In , Understanding Contributors e David Bollier, James Boyle, James C. Cox, Shubha Ghosh, Charlotte Hess, Nancy d Knowledge as a Commons, experts from a range of disciplines discuss i t Kranich, Peter Levine, Wendy Pradt Lougee, Elinor Ostrom, Charles M. Schweik, Peter o the knowledge commons in the digital era—how to conceptualize it, r Suber, J. Todd Swarthout, Donald J. Waters s edited by Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom protect it, and build it.
  • The Commons As a Neglected Factor of Information Policy

    The Commons As a Neglected Factor of Information Policy

    THE COMMONS AS A NEGLECTED FACTOR OF INFORMATION POLICY Yochai Benkler* ABSTRACT Direct government intervention and privatization have long been the dominant institutional approaches to implementing information policy. Policies pursued using these approaches have tended to result in a centralized information production and exchange system. The paper suggests that adding a third cluster of institutional devices, commons, may be a more effective approach to decentralizing information production. The paper uses two examples, from spectrum regulation and intellectual property, to show that regulating certain resources as commons is feasible, and that such commons can cause organizations and individuals who use these resources to organize the way they produce information in a decentralized pattern. The paper suggests that identifying additional resources capable of being used as commons, and investing in the institutional design necessary to maintain stable commons in these resources, serves two constitutional commitments. First, commons are the preferred approach to serving the commitment that government not unnecessarily prevent individuals from using or communicating information. Second, commons facilitate “the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources.” INTRODUCTION Information policy in the United States has been framed by the two institutional approaches generally considered available for its implementation—direct government intervention and privatization. “Direct government intervention” refers