DOCSLIB.ORG

The Lone Star State Lone the 3: Lesson Copyright © Mcgraw-Hill Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Lone Star State Lone the 3: Lesson Copyright © Mcgraw-Hill Education NAME ________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS ______ The Lone Star State Lesson 3: The U.S.-Mexican War ESSENTIAL QUESTION Why does conflict develop? Terms to Know reparation payment for damages and suffering envoy a person who is sent by one government to represent it in dealing with another government revise to change a text armistice a temporary end to fighting abandon to leave and never return Where in the world? Mexican victory U.S. victory 40°N Mexican forces U.S. forces Mexican Cession San Francisco Mexican Monterey Cession (July 7, 1846) UNITED STATES Los Angeles Disputed with San Diego San Pascual Mexico (Dec. 6, 1846) Doña Ana 30°N El Brazito ATLANTIC (Dec. 25, 1846) R io OCEAN G Texas N r a u n e d c e e San Antonio New Orleans s Sacramento R. (Feb. 28, 1847) Monterrey N 120°W (Sept. 21–24, Corpus Christi 1846) PACIFIC Buena Vista W E (Feb. 22–23, 1847) OCEAN Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma S Saltillo Matamoros (May 8–9, 1846) Mazatlán Gulf of 20°N Tampico Mexico MEXICO 0 400 miles Mexico City 0 400 kilometers (Sept. 13, 1847) Albers Equal-Area projection Veracruz Cerro Gordo (Mar. 29, 1847) 110°W (Apr. 17–18, 1847) 90°W 80°W Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. classroom for reproduce to is granted Permission Education. © McGraw-Hill Copyright Reading Essentials and Study Guide 193 NAME ________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS ______ The Lone Star State Lesson 3: The U.S.-Mexican War, continued Causes of the War Defining Guiding Question What disagreements and negotiations led up to 1. What are reparations? the U.S.-Mexican war? Texas’s annexation strained relations between the United States and Mexico. Mexico disputed the southern border of Texas. Texas and the United States maintained that it was at the Rio Grande. Mexico said it was at the Nueces River. Both nations claimed the Marking the Text land between the two rivers. The United States also demanded 2. Highlight the sentences that Mexico pay reparations, or payments, to Americans for that explain the deal damages before and during the Texas Revolution. Mexico refused. President Polk wanted In 1845 President James K. Polk sent John Slidell as a secret Slidell to make with envoy, or representative of the U.S. government, to Mexico. He Mexico. wanted Slidell to purchase the disputed territory between the rivers and the area that is now California, Arizona, and New Explaining Mexico. Slidell was to settle any reparations claims, too. Slidell 3. Why did Mexican was to offer Mexico $30 million for the land. President Herrera react Mexican president José Joaquín de Herrera feared that giving to the Slidell mission as up anything to the United States would make him seem weak and he did? cost him the support of his people. Herrera and Mexican officials refused to meet with Slidell. Polk viewed the refusal to meet as an insult. He ordered General Zachary Taylor, the commander of the U.S. forces in Texas, to cross the Nueces River and camp near the Rio Grande. The Mexican government Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. classroom for reproduce to is granted Permission Education. © McGraw-Hill Copyright viewed the crossing of the Nueces by General Taylor’s troops as an invasion. Soon after, on April 25, 1846, Mexican troops attacked Reading some of Taylor’s soldiers. Sixteen Americans were killed or injured. Progress Check On May 9, 1846, Polk was preparing a declaration of war against Mexico to present to Congress. It was to be based on Mexico’s 4. What Mexican action failure to pay the reparations. Then Polk learned about the Mexican angered President Polk? attack on what he saw as U.S. land. He could now make that the reason for war. War and Its Aftermath Guiding Question What did Texas and the United States gain as a Marking the Text result of the U.S.-Mexican War? 5. Highlight the sentence Polk quickly revised, or changed, the war declaration he had been that tells how Congress preparing. After he delivered it to Congress on May 11, 1846, the reacted to Polk’s U.S. Congress overwhelmingly approved the declaration of war on declaration of war. May 13, 1846. On May 8 and 9, General Taylor won battles at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma, north of the Rio Grande. Then he led his army to Mexico. 194 Reading Essentials and Study Guide NAME ________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS ______ The Lone Star State Lesson 3: The U.S.-Mexican War, continued Along with regular U.S. Army troops, Taylor had many Texas volunteers. More than 5,000 Texans fought in the U.S.-Mexican Explaining War. Governor J. Pinckney Henderson took a leave of absence to command Texas troops. Several companies of Texas Rangers 6. What was the role of assisted him. Texans in the war? Women also took part in the war. Sarah Borginnis, who followed her husband on the march, helped the troops by cooking, washing, and dressing wounds. She showed bravery during battle by loading cartridges and carrying wounded soldiers from the battlefield. Identifying Taylor won the Battle of Monterrey in September 1846. He and the Mexican commander there agreed to an armistice, or a temporary 7. What was the last end to fighting. President Polk told the army to continue its invasion battle of the U.S.- of Mexico. Taylor then advanced to Saltillo. Meanwhile, a small Mexican War and what army took control of Santa Fe before heading south into Mexico. was the outcome? Another American force seized cities in California. In February 1847, General Santa Anna, who had returned to power, attacked Taylor’s forces. The two armies clashed in the Battle of Buena Vista. The Americans won. American troops next invaded Mexico from the Gulf of Mexico. A large force landed at Veracruz. Santa Anna marched thousands of soldiers to meet the invaders. The two forces met in the Battle Marking the of Cerro Gordo on April 17–18, 1847. The Americans won, and the Text Mexican army retreated to Mexico City. 8. Circle the conditions The last major battle came on September 12–13, 1847. The Battle of that Mexico had to meet Chapultepec Castle was fought at a fort that protected Mexico City. as part of the Treaty of American soldiers overran the fort. That night Santa Anna and his Guadalupe Hidalgo. remaining troops abandoned, or left, Mexico City. Soon after, American forces marched into the city. Identifying On February 2, 1848, both governments signed a peace treaty Central Issues at Guadalupe Hidalgo (gwad•ah•LOO•pay ee•DAHL•goh). The treaty 9. What did the treaty ended the war. promise Mexicans who were living in territory Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo that became part of Mexico agreed to: United States agreed to: the United States? • Give up all claims to Texas • Pay Mexico $15 million • Accept the Rio Grande as • Pay reparations up to $3.25 million the border owed to U.S. citizens by Mexico • Give all territory between • Guarantee rights to Mexicans Texas and the Pacific living in the U.S.; they would have Ocean to the United States a year to become U.S. citizens Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. classroom for reproduce to is granted Permission Education. © McGraw-Hill Copyright Reading Essentials and Study Guide 195 NAME ________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS ______ The Lone Star State Lesson 3: The U.S.-Mexican War, continued The new territory became known as the Mexican Cession. It raised Reading political issues in Texas and the United States. Southerners wanted Progress Check the new territories open to slavery. Many Northerners objected to that. There was also a question of the Texas border with New Mexico. 10. How did the Pearce Texas claimed about half of what is now New Mexico. However, the Plan and the Gadsden people there did not want to be part of Texas. Also, many Northerners Purchase establish the feared that Texans would introduce slavery into the area. boundaries of Texas After much debate, Congress worked out the Compromise of and the United States? 1850. It said that California would be admitted as a free, or non- slave, state. The voters in the remaining parts of the Mexican Cession could decide about slavery for themselves. The Pearce Plan was part of the Compromise. In this plan, Texas agreed to give up claims to New Mexico for $10 million to pay off its public debt. In 1852 Franklin Pierce was elected U.S. president. He arranged the purchase of a small section of Mexican land at the southern border of New Mexico and Arizona. James Gadsden, the U.S. minister to Mexico, carried out the deal. The United States paid $10 million for the area known as the Gadsden Purchase. The purchase set the border between the United States and Mexico. Writing Check for Understanding Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. classroom for reproduce to is granted Permission Education. © McGraw-Hill Copyright 1. Expository What was U.S. President Polk’s original reason for war with Mexico? What was the final reason? 2. Expository What political issues did the Mexican Cession cause for the United States and Texas? 196 Reading Essentials and Study Guide .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 “Pioneer Days in Florida: Diaries and Letters from the Settling of The
    “Pioneer Days in Florida: Diaries and Letters from the Settling of the Sunshine State, 1800-1900” A Listing of Materials Selected for the Proposed Digital Project Provenance of Materials All materials come from the Florida Miscellaneous Manuscripts Collection in the P.K. Yonge Library of Florida History, Special Collections, George A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida. Diaries and family collections are stored by the name of the major creator/writer. Other items have individual call numbers and are stored in folders in a shelving area dedicated to all types of small collections and miscellaneous papers (19th and 20th century records and personal papers, print materials, photocopies of research materials from other archives, etc.). “Pioneer Days in Florida” will digitize only the original 19th century manuscripts in the possession of the University of Florida. Exclusions from scanning will include—blank pages in diaries; routine receipts in family papers; and non-original or photocopied materials sometimes filed with original manuscripts. About the Metadata The project diaries have corresponding UF Library Catalog Records. Family collections have EAD Finding Aids along with UF Library Catalog Records. Other items are described in an online guide called the Florida Miscellaneous Manuscripts Database (http://web.uflib.ufl.edu/miscman/asp/advanced.htm ) and in some cases have a UF Library Catalog Record (noted below when present). Diaries and Memoirs: Existing UF Library Catalog Records Writer / Years Covered Caroline Eliza Williams, 1811-1812, 1814, 1823 http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp?st=UF005622894&ix=pm&I=0&V=D&pm=1 Vicente Sebastián Pintado, (Concessiones de Tierras, 1817) http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp?st=UF002784661&ix=pm&I=0&V=D&pm=1 Mary Port Macklin, (Memoir, 1823/28) http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp?st=UF002821999&ix=pm&I=0&V=D&pm=1 William S.
    [Show full text]
  • Completeandleft
    MEN WOMEN 1. JA Jason Aldean=American singer=188,534=33 Julia Alexandratou=Model, singer and actress=129,945=69 Jin Akanishi=Singer-songwriter, actor, voice actor, Julie Anne+San+Jose=Filipino actress and radio host=31,926=197 singer=67,087=129 John Abraham=Film actor=118,346=54 Julie Andrews=Actress, singer, author=55,954=162 Jensen Ackles=American actor=453,578=10 Julie Adams=American actress=54,598=166 Jonas Armstrong=Irish, Actor=20,732=288 Jenny Agutter=British film and television actress=72,810=122 COMPLETEandLEFT Jessica Alba=actress=893,599=3 JA,Jack Anderson Jaimie Alexander=Actress=59,371=151 JA,James Agee June Allyson=Actress=28,006=290 JA,James Arness Jennifer Aniston=American actress=1,005,243=2 JA,Jane Austen Julia Ann=American pornographic actress=47,874=184 JA,Jean Arthur Judy Ann+Santos=Filipino, Actress=39,619=212 JA,Jennifer Aniston Jean Arthur=Actress=45,356=192 JA,Jessica Alba JA,Joan Van Ark Jane Asher=Actress, author=53,663=168 …….. JA,Joan of Arc José González JA,John Adams Janelle Monáe JA,John Amos Joseph Arthur JA,John Astin James Arthur JA,John James Audubon Jann Arden JA,John Quincy Adams Jessica Andrews JA,Jon Anderson John Anderson JA,Julie Andrews Jefferson Airplane JA,June Allyson Jane's Addiction Jacob ,Abbott ,Author ,Franconia Stories Jim ,Abbott ,Baseball ,One-handed MLB pitcher John ,Abbott ,Actor ,The Woman in White John ,Abbott ,Head of State ,Prime Minister of Canada, 1891-93 James ,Abdnor ,Politician ,US Senator from South Dakota, 1981-87 John ,Abizaid ,Military ,C-in-C, US Central Command, 2003-
    [Show full text]
  • Black Lives and Whitened Stories: from the Lowcountry to the Mountains?
    National Park Service <Running Headers> <E> U.S. Department of the Interior Historic Resource Study of Black History at Rock Hill/Connemara Carl Sandburg Home NHS BLACK LIVES AND WHITENED STORIES: From the Lowcountry to the Mountains David E. Whisnant and Anne Mitchell Whisnant CULTURAL RESOURCES SOUTHEAST REGION BLACK LIVES AND WHITENED STORIES: From the Lowcountry to the Mountains By David E. Whisnant, Ph.D. Anne Mitchell Whisnant, Ph.D. Primary Source History Services A HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY OF BLACK HISTORY AT ROCK HILL/CONNEMARA Presented to Carl Sandburg Home National Historic Site In Partnership with the Organization of American Historians/National Park Service Southeast Region History Program NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NOVEMBER 2020 Cultural Resources Division Southeast Regional Office National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 (404) 507-5847 Black Lives and Whitened Stories: From the Lowcountry to the Mountains By David E. Whisnant and Anne Mitchell Whisnant http://www.nps.gov Cover Photos: Smyth Servants: Black female servant rolling children in stroller. Photograph, Carl Sandburg National Historic Site archives, (1910; Sadie “Boots” & Rosana [?]). Smyth Servants: Swedish House HSR, p. 22; (Collection of William McKay, great-grandson of the Smyths). Also Barn Complex HSR Fig. 11, p. 7: Figure 11. The Smyths’ servants in front of the kitchen building, ca. 1910. (Collection of Smyth great-grandson William McKay). Sylvene: From HSR, Main House, pp. 10, 37: Collection of Juliane Heggoy. Man and 3: Swedish House HSR, p. 22; (Collection of William McKay, great-grandson of the Smyths). Also Barn Complex HSR Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Collection, 1860-1977
    Civil War collection, 1860-1977 Emory University Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library Atlanta, GA 30322 404-727-6887 [email protected] Descriptive Summary Title: Civil War collection, 1860-1977 Call Number: Manuscript Collection No. 20 Extent: 10 linear feet (23 boxes), 7 bound volumes (BV), 7 oversized papers boxes and 29 oversized papers folders (OP), 4 microfilm reels (MF), and 1 framed item (FR) Abstract: The Civil War collection is an artificial collection consisting of both contemporary and non-contemporary materials relating to the American Civil War (1861-1865). Language: Materials entirely in English. Administrative Information Restrictions on Access Unrestricted access. Terms Governing Use and Reproduction All requests subject to limitations noted in departmental policies on reproduction. Additional Physical Form The Robert F. Davis diaries in Subseries 1.1 are also available on microfilm. Source Various sources. Citation [after identification of item(s)], Civil War collection, Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library, Emory University. Processing Reprocessed by Susan Potts McDonald, 2013. This collection contains material that was originally part of Miscellaneous Collections A-D, F, and H-I. In 2017, these collections were discontinued and the contents dispersed amongst other collections by subject or provenance to improve accessibility. Emory Libraries provides copies of its finding aids for use only in research and private study. Copies supplied may not be copied for others or otherwise distributed without prior consent of the holding repository. Civil War collection Manuscript Collection No. 20 Sheet music in this collection was formerly part of an unaccessioned collection of sheet music that was transferred to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Westward Expansion 1820-1870
    SECTION 19 WESTWARD E XPANSION 1820-1870 “Go West, young man, and grow up with the country.”—Horace Greeley 1492 1820 1870 Present MANIFEST DESTINY From the beginning—since the settlement of Jamestown in 1607, a westward moving frontier marked America's history. In 1845 John O’Sullivan, editor of the Democratic Review , expressed what Americans had thought all along: It was America's manifest destiny, or clear future, to expand her empire of liberty from coast to coast. The1862 Homestead Act drew thousands of settlers westward. It offered free land to heads of families (160 acres) and to single adults (80) acres, along with a requirement that the land be cultivated for five years. Inventive and resourceful, homesteaders on the Great Plains often built sod houses from clumps of hard-packed, grass-covered dirt. Many came West to strike it rich in the mining camps of California and Nevada or on the long cattle drives across the Plains, where a $5 dollar cow bought in Texas sold for $40 at a Kansas railhead. And speeding everyone westward was the first transcontinental railroad, built in 1869. 252 19–1 # WESTWARD EXPANSION: AN OVERVIEW EXPANSION OF THE UNITED STATES, 1607-1867 HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPANSION, 1819-1867 1819—Adams-Onis Treaty 1845-1850 In the Adams-Onis Treaty, negotiated by Secretary of 1845—Texas Annexation to the United States State John Quincy Adams, Spain ceded East Florida 1846—Oregon Country, Treaty with Britain to the United States and gave up its claim to West 1848—Mexican Cession, Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Internal Politics in American Diplomacy
    Autopsy of a Failure: The Frustrated Career of the Union Party Movement, 1848-1860 Sean Patrick Nalty Kalispell, MT B.A., University of Montana, May 2004 M.A., University of Virginia, August 2005 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………....1 CHAPTER 1 – Loosening Bonds of Party, Loosening Bonds of Union, 1848-1849…………..10 CHAPTER 2 – The “Partisan” Crisis of 1850…………………………………………......41 CHAPTER 3 – An Abortive Realignment, 1851-1852……………………………………….90 CHAPTER 4 – “The Test of Parties,” 1852-1854…………………………………………..139 CHAPTER 5 – The Balance of Power, 1854-1856…………………………………………186 CHAPTER 6 – “The Biggest and Best Party We Have Ever Seen,” 1857-1859……………...226 CHAPTER 7 – “We Are Going to Destruction As Fast As We Can,” 1859-1861……….257 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………..292 Introduction The thesis of this dissertation searches for elements of continuity in the continued appeals for a national “Union Party” from roughly 1849 to 1861. Historians have explored various parts of this movement in a discrete fashion, but never has anyone attempted to examine the history of the effort to create a Union Party across the decade of the 1850s. What I find is that all incarnations of the Union Party stressed a common devotion to the rule of law, which they saw as under threat by sectional agitators who stirred up the passions of the public. Whether in debates over the right of the federal government to coerce a state, the legality of the Fugitive Slave Act, and presence of filibustering oversees, or the violence which attended partisan elections, Americans’ respect for the rule of law seemed at issue throughout that turbulent decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wards of Andrew Jackson by Rachel Meredith a Thesis
    “There Was Somebody Always Dying and Leaving Jackson as Guardian”: The Wards of Andrew Jackson by Rachel Meredith A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History, with Concentration in Public History Middle Tennessee State University May 2013 Thesis Committee: Dr. Rebecca Conard, Chair Dr. Mary Hoffschwelle ! This research is dedicated to my dad, who left me no choice but to love history. Dad, no more games of stump the chump, ok? ii!! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my parents and the rest of my family for their continued love and support throughout my education and my life. My husband Jarrod has been steadfast in his encouragement to me throughout this long process, and I could not be more grateful to him. I would also like to thank Dr. Mark Cheathem for giving me the privilege of reading his forthcoming manuscript and allowing me to incorporate it in my thesis, as well as his input. Stewart Southard and Dr. Tom Kanon were invaluable to me in freely giving their constant guidance. I would like to thank Dr. Rebecca Conard and Dr. Mary Hoffschwelle for their continued support and assistance. Finally, I would like to thank the staff of the Tennessee State Library & Archives. The benefit of their institutional knowledge was priceless for the foundation of this thesis, as there are no written histories concerning the guardianship process in early Tennessee. iii! ! ABSTRACT Andrew Jackson has been widely studied through many lenses of history. However, the lens of kinship has not been widely incorporated.
    [Show full text]
  • "G" S Circle 243 Elrod Dr Goose Creek Sc 29445 $5.34
    Unclaimed/Abandoned Property FullName Address City State Zip Amount "G" S CIRCLE 243 ELROD DR GOOSE CREEK SC 29445 $5.34 & D BC C/O MICHAEL A DEHLENDORF 2300 COMMONWEALTH PARK N COLUMBUS OH 43209 $94.95 & D CUMMINGS 4245 MW 1020 FOXCROFT RD GRAND ISLAND NY 14072 $19.54 & F BARNETT PO BOX 838 ANDERSON SC 29622 $44.16 & H COLEMAN PO BOX 185 PAMPLICO SC 29583 $1.77 & H FARM 827 SAVANNAH HWY CHARLESTON SC 29407 $158.85 & H HATCHER PO BOX 35 JOHNS ISLAND SC 29457 $5.25 & MCMILLAN MIDDLETON C/O MIDDLETON/MCMILLAN 227 W TRADE ST STE 2250 CHARLOTTE NC 28202 $123.69 & S COLLINS RT 8 BOX 178 SUMMERVILLE SC 29483 $59.17 & S RAST RT 1 BOX 441 99999 $9.07 127 BLUE HERON POND LP 28 ANACAPA ST STE B SANTA BARBARA CA 93101 $3.08 176 JUNKYARD 1514 STATE RD SUMMERVILLE SC 29483 $8.21 263 RECORDS INC 2680 TILLMAN ST N CHARLESTON SC 29405 $1.75 3 E COMPANY INC PO BOX 1148 GOOSE CREEK SC 29445 $91.73 A & M BROKERAGE 214 CAMPBELL RD RIDGEVILLE SC 29472 $6.59 A B ALEXANDER JR 46 LAKE FOREST DR SPARTANBURG SC 29302 $36.46 A B SOLOMON 1 POSTON RD CHARLESTON SC 29407 $43.38 A C CARSON 55 SURFSONG RD JOHNS ISLAND SC 29455 $96.12 A C CHANDLER 256 CANNON TRAIL RD LEXINGTON SC 29073 $76.19 A C DEHAY RT 1 BOX 13 99999 $0.02 A C FLOOD C/O NORMA F HANCOCK 1604 BOONE HALL DR CHARLESTON SC 29407 $85.63 A C THOMPSON PO BOX 47 NEW YORK NY 10047 $47.55 A D WARNER ACCOUNT FOR 437 GOLFSHORE 26 E RIDGEWAY DR CENTERVILLE OH 45459 $43.35 A E JOHNSON PO BOX 1234 % BECI MONCKS CORNER SC 29461 $0.43 A E KNIGHT RT 1 BOX 661 99999 $18.00 A E MARTIN 24 PHANTOM DR DAYTON OH 45431 $50.95
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Jackson to James Gadsden, from Correspondence of Andrew Jackson
    Library of Congress Andrew Jackson to James Gadsden, from Correspondence of Andrew Jackson. Edited by John Spencer Bassett. TO JAMES GADSDEN.1 1 Library of Congress, Donelson Papers. Washington, November, 1836 (?). Dear sir, your letter of the 26th Octobr. is recd. containing the unpleasant news of the retrograde movement of Genl Call for the want of supplies.2 It is true that the whole Florida war from the first to the present time has been a succession of blunders and misfortune, as the movement had been made ahead of the supplies. (when there had been so much ordered) and the withlacooche reached, Powells camp and supplies discovered, he ought to have been reached, defeated and his supply of corn etc., obtained to have forraged and sustained our troops until their own supplies could have been had. Why this was not done must be for those who had the immediate command to explain—every thing at present is wrong but I hope the energy of major Pierce3 will soon put the Troops in motion. I sincerely regret the fate of Lane4 —he had acted rashly and without orders, left the post where Genl Jessup expected to find him, disappointed in not finding and defeating powell he had got into a false position and could not get back as I suppose to his post, was mortified and destroyed himself in a moment of despair as I suppose. 2 The Seminole War lasted from 1836 to 1842. It grew out of the attempt to induce the Seminoles of Florida to remove west of the Mississippi in accordance with the treaties of Payne Landing, 1832, and of Fort Gibson, 1833.
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNITED STATES and MEXICO 1861-1865 by Thomas T. Drum A
    The United States and Mexico, 1861-1865 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Orum, Thomas Tondee, 1940- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 03:58:33 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551948 THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICO 1861-1865 by Thomas T . Drum A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 7 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowl­ edgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ ests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: /f, ///y Date Professor of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to Professor Russell C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gadsden Family Papers, 1032.00
    Gadsden family papers, 1703-ca. 1955 SCHS 1032.00 Containers 11/140-144 Creator: Gadsen Family. Description: 2 linear ft. Biographical/Historical Note: South Carolina family. Christopher Gadsden (1724-1805) was a Charleston, S.C. merchant, Revolutionary War general, state legislator, and U.S. Continental Congressman. His son Philip Gadsden (1761-1824) was the father of Rev. Philip Gadsden (1798- 1870), Rev. Christopher Edwards Gadsden (1785-1852), James Gadsden (1788-1858) and Thomas Gadsden (1796-1871). Rev. Philip Gadsden, an Episcopal minister, married Susan B. Hamilton, daughter of Gov. Paul Hamilton (1762-1816), and their children included John Gadsden (1833-1902) of Summerville (S.C.), who was the father of John Blacklock Gadsden (1860-1944). Rev. Thomas F. Gadsden (1839-1891), rector of Grace Church (Anderson, S.C.), was the son of Christopher Edwards Gadsden. Scope and Content: Papers consist of correspondence, estate records, writings, and other items. Included are the papers of John Gadsden (1833-1902) and Gadsden allied families. Correspondence includes letters (1854-1857) of Philip Gadsden (d. 1857) in Mexico City (Mexico) to his mother and sister regarding experiences there with his uncle James Gadsden (a U.S. foreign minister); topics include social life, social conditions, and family matters. In addition, there is correspondenece (1840-1852) of Christopher Edwards Gadsden and Thomas Gadsden regarding family matters, religion, politics, and education. Papers of Thomas F. Gadsden (1839-1891) include correspondence with W.B.W. Howe and other clergy concerning affairs of the diocese and an essay (1851) on war. Estate records (1829-1895) of Philip Gadsden (1798-1870) include accounts, copies of his will, and other items.
    [Show full text]
  • Some General Aspects of the Gadsden Treaty
    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 8 Number 3 Article 2 7-1-1933 Some General Aspects of the Gadsden Treaty Frederic A. Coffey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Coffey, Frederic A.. "Some General Aspects of the Gadsden Treaty." New Mexico Historical Review 8, 3 (1933). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol8/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. NEW MEXICO HISTORICAL REVIEW VOL. VIII JULY, 1933 No.3 SOME GENERAL ASPECTS OF THE GADSDEN TREATY* By FREDERIC A. COFFEY ,~E majority of our ~eneral United States histories have T lIttle to say concermng the Gadsden Treaty. One con- cise reference reads: ' The net result of, the efforts at expa~sion southward was an acquisition of minor impor­ tance. In 1853 James Gadsden, representing the U. S., purchased from Mexico at a cost of $10,­ 000,000, a strip of land lying to the south of the Gila River. By this act a boundary dispute was settled with Mexico, and the U. S. acquired a ,tract of land, which, according to surveys of the War Department, was needful for the building of a 'transcontinental railroad along a southern route. Thus Schlesinger succinctly tells the story.' In the light of the panorama of ~vents coming full and fast from 1846 on for over a decade, it is not strange that the historians have, passed the treaty up, to emphasize the things which for longer periods held the attention of the nation.
    [Show full text]