DOCSLIB.ORG

Chronological List of Addresses, Speeches and Letters 1940 - 1949

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chronological List of Addresses, Speeches and Letters 1940 - 1949 Chronological List of Addresses, Speeches and Letters 1940 - 1949 1940 - 1949 Buck, Pearl, “Address at Howard University—Fight Fascism at Home and Abroad,” June 5, 1942 Einstein, Albert, “To the United Nations…” 1947 Ickes, Harold, (Also known as: Harold LeClair Ickes, Honest Harold, Harold Le Clair Ickes) Calls for What is an American, May 18, 1941 Lewis, John L., Head of the Miners Union, Defends Coal Miners before Congress, Additional Background, April 3, 1947 Lindbergh, Charles, Defends Isolationism, April 23, 1941 Marshall, George C., “The Marshall Plan,” June 5, 1947 MacArthur, Douglas, “People of the Philippines, I Have Returned,” 1944 Oppenheimer, J. Robert, “Do not Forget Morality in the Pursuit of Scientists,” November 2, 1945 Robinson, Jackie, (Also known as: Jackie Robinson, John Roosevelt Robinson), Address to the House Un-American Activities Committee, July 18, 1949 Roosevelt, Eleanor, "Defends Civil Liberties to the ACLU", March 14, 1940 Roosevelt, Eleanor, “The Struggle for Human Rights,” September 28, 1948 Roosevelt, Franklin D., “The Arsenal of Democracy,” December 29, 1940 Roosevelt, Franklin D., “Declaration of war against Japan,” December 8, 1941 Roosevelt, Franklin D., State of the Union “Four Freedoms” Lend-Lease speech, January 6, 1941 Truman, Harry S., Radio address announcing Hiroshima bombing, August 6, 1945 Truman, Harry S., “Do-Nothing” Congress", October 7, 1948 Truman, Harry S., Address to Congress on Greece and Turkey, March 12, 1947 Source: Senator Robert Torricelli and Andrew Carroll, eds. In Our Own Words:Extraordinary Speeches of the American Century. New York: Washington Square Press Publication, 1999. Buck, Pearl, “Address at Howard University—Fight Fascism at Home and Abroad,” June 5, 1942 Nobel Laureate Pearl Buck Contends That to Defeat Fascism Abroad, Americans Must Fight for Equality at Home. When the United States officially announced its entry in World War II, sudden and sweeping charges were required in virtually all aspects of American life. Millions of soldiers had to be drafted. Food had to be rationed. An unprecedented number of planes, aircraft carriers, tanks, bombs, guns, and other weapons of war had to be built in an impossibly short amount of time. (The government ordered over $loo billion in war contracts in the first six months of 1942 alone, and the tax system consequently needed to be overhauled almost entirely.) For a country just awakening from an economic nightmare, the task ahead was both daunting and galvanizing. Many of the nation's most prominent social, religious, and political leaders encouraged citizens to unite solidly behind the war effort, while others used the war to accentuate what they saw as American hypocrisy They contended that the United States was willing to fight and spend lavishly for freedom overseas but not for those at home mired in poverty or victimized by racial discrimination. Pearl Buck, the first American woman to win the Nobel Prize for literature and an adamant proponent of civil rights, believed the two positions were not mutually exclusive. In a June ,5, 1942, commencement .speech at Howard University, Buck, who spent most of her life in China, said that the defeat of fascism overseas would be a victory for human rights throughout the world, and she encouraged the graduating students to recognize their role in defeating oppression both overseas and within the United States. I believe this is the first time in my life that I have ever made a commencement address. The invitations I have had I have refused until now because it has always seemed to me presumptuous to offer advice or even to forecast for those who have not yet entered in the sort of life that lies ahead of college. Life is so individual a thing in ordinary times, so much depends on the person who is to live it, that all I have ever felt I could say was easily said in a sentence: The only way to find out anything about life is to live it as heartily as you can. So what was the use of making a speech about what could be said in one sentence? But I accepted the invitation this particular year to this particular university for a very special reason: These are not ordinary times, and this is no ordinary graduating class.... I am asking today only one question: How can every citizen in this country fulfill his responsibility as a citizen of our democracy? I repeat, it is as a democracy that we will win this war. If we cease to be a democracy, we will not win this war, and there will not be any peace if we don't win this war. Therefore, it is not enough merely to join the army and the navy and the air force if they will have us, and to do nothing if they won't. It is not enough to pour our savings into war bonds. It is not enough to put our lives into factories and war work so far as we are allowed. We will not win this war unless we win it as a nation where human beings are equal and human rights are respected. The peace will be no peace unless it is based upon the principles of human equality. In profound belief in democracy, thus in deepest love of our country-, let us now realize that when we work for democracy and our own nation we are in the most important sense working for victory in war and in peace. Therefore, today I believe that discrimination in our country must go, because until it does, we will not have won the war. We cannot fight for freedom unless we fight for freedom for all. We are not better than fascists if we fight for freedom of one group and not another, for the benefit of one race and not another, for the aggrandizement of a part and not the betterment of the whole. And we must be better than fascists. We cannot allow in our nation the evil root of something which Hitler has developed into a system of slavery the like of which the world has never seen, where the individual is nothing but a piece of property seized and used and tossed aside by a robber government. Japan's militarists, too, have for generations conceived the individual to be nothing but a tool, and the history of Japan during the last four generations has been the history of the struggle between the individual and the possessor state. And the beginning of that struggle anywhere is always in the degradation of a class, the condemnation for some trivial cause of a group of individuals. It is ironic that in Germany the death grip of the state today upon the individual arose not out of too much unity but too little. Germany has never really achieved a sense of nationhood. A loose handful of states, her people have longed for unity. But in the desire to be integrated into a nation, they have handed themselves over to a handful of persons who have wrecked them not only as a nation but as individuals. We, too, are not a unified people. We have sprung from many sources and many places, and we too have a deep-seated longing for unity. Perhaps that is why we exalt more than most democracies in the power of our government. In a common government we find a sort of unity which otherwise we lack. Perhaps that is why we look to government instead of to our wise men, as the Chinese and Indians do. But this desire to be unified must not lead us in the directions of the Nazis, where first a race was despised and then where every individual who differed from the unifying force was eliminated. The danger of race prejudice always is that it tends to lump people together and ignore the individual. Any nation which tolerates prejudice against one group in its people carries inside itself the potentialities of developing fascism, as a persistent sore is always a potential cancer. It has to be watched, and the body is never safe until the sore is cut out. The equality of opportunity, therefore, which you have not been given in your country has now become more than an individual handicap, more than a group misfortune. It has become a national danger of the sharpest sort, a rock upon which our whole nation may founder. It is now necessary that all of us who believe with all our hearts in democracy work together to bring about human equality in the world of which our nation is only a part.... We are in the midst of a struggle in the hour of change, when by action for freedom we can still shape the world toward freedom. We ought so to act that all we do is designed to break down that which denies equality and forbids freedom. Therefore you are to be congratulated. You have come to your majority at a time in history when more than ever before all effort for freedom can count. You are trained, intelligent, and ready to work. You are citizens in a country which still allows free speech and individual effort. But most important of all-and here is your greatest advantage-you [as African Americans] belong to a group which more than any in the world knows what race prejudice is, and how even political freedom cannot do away with it, and you know that it must be done away with if democracy is to prevail. The white citizens of this country in their general ignorance cannot realize as clearly as you do how our nation is threatened by our inner division and what it means to the world if we do not achieve democracy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Constitutional Requirements for the Royal Morganatic Marriage
    The Constitutional Requirements for the Royal Morganatic Marriage Benoît Pelletier* This article examines the constitutional Cet article analyse les implications implications, for Canada and the other members of the constitutionnelles, pour le Canada et les autres pays Commonwealth, of a morganatic marriage in the membres du Commonwealth, d’un mariage British royal family. The Germanic concept of morganatique au sein de la famille royale britannique. “morganatic marriage” refers to a legal union between Le concept de «mariage morganatique», d’origine a man of royal birth and a woman of lower status, with germanique, renvoie à une union légale entre un the condition that the wife does not assume a royal title homme de descendance royale et une femme de statut and any children are excluded from their father’s rank inférieur, à condition que cette dernière n’acquière pas or hereditary property. un titre royal, ou encore qu’aucun enfant issu de cette For such a union to be celebrated in the royal union n’accède au rang du père ni n’hérite de ses biens. family, the parliament of the United Kingdom would Afin qu’un tel mariage puisse être célébré dans la have to enact legislation. If such a law had the effect of famille royale, une loi doit être adoptée par le denying any children access to the throne, the laws of parlement du Royaume-Uni. Or si une telle loi devait succession would be altered, and according to the effectivement interdire l’accès au trône aux enfants du second paragraph of the preamble to the Statute of couple, les règles de succession seraient modifiées et il Westminster, the assent of the Canadian parliament and serait nécessaire, en vertu du deuxième paragraphe du the parliaments of the Commonwealth that recognize préambule du Statut de Westminster, d’obtenir le Queen Elizabeth II as their head of state would be consentement du Canada et des autres pays qui required.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime, Law Enforcement, and Punishment
    Shirley Papers 48 Research Materials, Crime Series Inventory Box Folder Folder Title Research Materials Crime, Law Enforcement, and Punishment Capital Punishment 152 1 Newspaper clippings, 1951-1988 2 Newspaper clippings, 1891-1938 3 Newspaper clippings, 1990-1993 4 Newspaper clippings, 1994 5 Newspaper clippings, 1995 6 Newspaper clippings, 1996 7 Newspaper clippings, 1997 153 1 Newspaper clippings, 1998 2 Newspaper clippings, 1999 3 Newspaper clippings, 2000 4 Newspaper clippings, 2001-2002 Crime Cases Arizona 154 1 Cochise County 2 Coconino County 3 Gila County 4 Graham County 5-7 Maricopa County 8 Mohave County 9 Navajo County 10 Pima County 11 Pinal County 12 Santa Cruz County 13 Yavapai County 14 Yuma County Arkansas 155 1 Arkansas County 2 Ashley County 3 Baxter County 4 Benton County 5 Boone County 6 Calhoun County 7 Carroll County 8 Clark County 9 Clay County 10 Cleveland County 11 Columbia County 12 Conway County 13 Craighead County 14 Crawford County 15 Crittendon County 16 Cross County 17 Dallas County 18 Faulkner County 19 Franklin County Shirley Papers 49 Research Materials, Crime Series Inventory Box Folder Folder Title 20 Fulton County 21 Garland County 22 Grant County 23 Greene County 24 Hot Springs County 25 Howard County 26 Independence County 27 Izard County 28 Jackson County 29 Jefferson County 30 Johnson County 31 Lafayette County 32 Lincoln County 33 Little River County 34 Logan County 35 Lonoke County 36 Madison County 37 Marion County 156 1 Miller County 2 Mississippi County 3 Monroe County 4 Montgomery County
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Affairs Record
    1996 January Volume No XLII No 1 1995 CONTENTS Foreign Affairs Record VOL XLII NO 1 January, 1996 CONTENTS BRAZIL Visit of His Excellency Dr. Fernando Henrique Cardoso, President of the Federative Republic of Brazil to India 1 External Affairs Minister of India called on President of the Federative Republic of Brazil 1 Prime Minister of India met the President of Brazil 2 CAMBODIA External Affairs Minister's visit to Cambodia 3 Visit to India by First Prime Minister of Cambodia 4 Visit of First Prime Minister of Cambodia H.R.H. Samdech Krom Preah 4 CANADA Visit of Canadian Prime Minister to India 5 Joint Statement 6 FRANCE Condolence Message from the President of India to President of France on the Passing away of the former President of France 7 Condolence Message from the Prime Minister of India to President of France on the Passing away of the Former President of France 7 INDIA Agreement signed between India and Pakistan on the Prohibition of attack against Nuclear Installations and facilities 8 Nomination of Dr. (Smt.) Najma Heptullah, Deputy Chairman, Rajya Sabha by UNDP to serve as a Distinguished Human Development Ambassador 8 Second Meeting of the India-Uganda Joint Committee 9 Visit of Secretary General of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to India 10 IRAN Visit of Foreign Minister of Iran to India 10 LAOS External Affairs Minister's visit to Laos 11 NEPAL Visit of External Affairs Minister to Nepal 13 OFFICIAL SPOKESMAN'S STATEMENTS Discussion on Political and Economic Deve- lopments in the region
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-South Korea Relations
    U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth D. Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance Jonathan R. Corrado Research Associate May 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Overview South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in Asia. Congressional interest in South Korea is driven by both security and trade interests. Since the early 1950s, the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty commits the United States to help South Korea defend itself. Approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK, which is included under the U.S. “nuclear umbrella.” Washington and Seoul cooperate in addressing the challenges posed by North Korea. The two countries’ economies are joined by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). South Korea is the United States’ seventh-largest trading partner and the United States is South Korea’s second- largest trading partner. Between 2009 and the end of 2016, relations between the two countries arguably reached their most robust state in decades. Political changes in both countries in 2017, however, have generated uncertainty about the state of the relationship. Coordination of North Korea Policy Dealing with North Korea is the dominant strategic concern of the relationship. The Trump Administration appears to have raised North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs to a top U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki in Early Twentieth-Century Literature Urban Experiences in Finnish Prose Fiction 1890–1940
    lieven ameel Helsinki in Early Twentieth-Century Literature Urban Experiences in Finnish Prose Fiction 1890–1940 Studia Fennica Litteraria The Finnish Literature Society (SKS) was founded in 1831 and has, from the very beginning, engaged in publishing operations. It nowadays publishes literature in the fields of ethnology and folkloristics, linguistics, literary research and cultural history. The first volume of the Studia Fennica series appeared in 1933. Since 1992, the series has been divided into three thematic subseries: Ethnologica, Folkloristica and Linguistica. Two additional subseries were formed in 2002, Historica and Litteraria. The subseries Anthropologica was formed in 2007. In addition to its publishing activities, the Finnish Literature Society maintains research activities and infrastructures, an archive containing folklore and literary collections, a research library and promotes Finnish literature abroad. Studia fennica editorial board Pasi Ihalainen, Professor, University of Jyväskylä, Finland Timo Kaartinen, Title of Docent, Lecturer, University of Helsinki, Finland Taru Nordlund, Title of Docent, Lecturer, University of Helsinki, Finland Riikka Rossi, Title of Docent, Researcher, University of Helsinki, Finland Katriina Siivonen, Substitute Professor, University of Helsinki, Finland Lotte Tarkka, Professor, University of Helsinki, Finland Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen, Secretary General, Dr. Phil., Finnish Literature Society, Finland Tero Norkola, Publishing Director, Finnish Literature Society Maija Hakala, Secretary of the Board, Finnish Literature Society, Finland Editorial Office SKS P.O. Box 259 FI-00171 Helsinki www.finlit.fi Lieven Ameel Helsinki in Early Twentieth- Century Literature Urban Experiences in Finnish Prose Fiction 1890–1940 Finnish Literature Society · SKS · Helsinki Studia Fennica Litteraria 8 The publication has undergone a peer review. The open access publication of this volume has received part funding via a Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Transitions: Issues Involving Outgoing and Incoming Administrations
    Order Code RL34722 Presidential Transitions: Issues Involving Outgoing and Incoming Administrations Updated November 25, 2008 L. Elaine Halchin Coordinator Government and Finance Division Presidential Transitions: Issues Involving Outgoing and Incoming Administrations Summary The smooth and orderly transfer of power can be a notable feature of presidential transitions, and a testament to the legitimacy and durability of the electoral and democratic processes. Yet, at the same time, a variety of events, decisions, and activities contribute to what some may characterize as the unfolding drama of a presidential transition. Interparty transitions in particular might be contentious. Using the various powers available, a sitting President might use the transition period to attempt to secure his legacy or effect policy changes. Some observers have suggested that, if the incumbent has lost the election, he might try to enact policies in the waning months of his presidency that would “tie his successor’s hands.” On the other hand, a President-elect, eager to establish his policy agenda and populate his Administration with his appointees, will be involved in a host of decisions and activities, some of which might modify or overturn the previous Administration’s actions or decisions. Both the incumbent and the newly elected President can act unilaterally, through executive orders, recess appointments, and appointments to positions that do not require Senate confirmation. Additionally, a President can appoint individuals to positions that require Senate confirmation, and a presidential administration can influence the pace and substance of agency rulemaking. The disposition of government records (including presidential records and vice presidential records), the practice of “burrowing in” (which involves the conversion of political appointees to career status in the civil service), and the granting of pardons are three activities associated largely with the outgoing President’s Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rhetorical Analysis of Selected Sermons by Sam Jones During His Emergence As a National Figure, 1872-1885
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1980 A Rhetorical Analysis of Selected Sermons by Sam Jones During His Emergence as a National Figure, 1872-1885. Herman Daniel Champion Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Champion, Herman Daniel Jr, "A Rhetorical Analysis of Selected Sermons by Sam Jones During His Emergence as a National Figure, 1872-1885." (1980). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3553. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3553 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2004 No. 139 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 4, 2005, at 12 noon. Senate WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2004 The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was generations. Thank You for Your pro- ple with issues and wisdom to seek called to order by the President pro tection. You make wars to cease, de- Your guidance. tempore (Mr. STEVENS). stroying the weapons of those who Bless and strengthen the many staff- fight against Your purposes. Today, ers who provide the wind beneath the PRAYER guide our lawmakers with Your justice wings of our leaders. Bring to them a The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- and keep them as the apple of Your bountiful harvest for their many fered the following prayer: eye. Instruct them in Your wisdom and months of faithful toil. Let us pray. hide them under the shadow of Your Bless all who mourn the loss of Stan Faithful God, who stretches out the wings. Help them to find light in Your Kimmitt. He will be greatly missed. Earth above the waters, Your Name is laws and knowledge in Your instruc- We pray this in Your holy Name. great and Your goodness extends to all tions. Give them patience as they grap- Amen. NOTICE If the 108th Congress, 2d Session, adjourns sine die on or before December 10, 2004, a final issue of the Congres- sional Record for the 108th Congress, 2d Session, will be published on Monday, December 20, 2004, in order to permit Members to revise and extend their remarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening of the Solemn Debate with President François Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel
    European Parliament President Martin Schulz Opening of the solemn debate with President François Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel Speeches Internal Policies and EU Institutions Strasbourg 07-10-2015 Monsieur le Président de la République Française, Sehr geehrte Frau Bundeskanzlerin, I extend a warm welcome to you both. This is an historic moment: the President of France and the Chancellor of Germany, here in the European Parliament - the home of European democracy - in Strasbourg - the symbol of Franco-German reconciliation - speaking today, together, about the future of Europe. For centuries, Germany and France were arch-enemies - trapped in a vicious circle of war, defeat, humiliation and revenge. Millions more had to die, with Europe destroyed, before there was reconciliation between the two states - thanks to the courage of Charles de Gaulle and Konrad Adenauer. That was one more historic step on the road to peace in Europe. Without reconciliation between France and Germany, the European unification process would never have been able to develop as it has. But, by the same token, without European unification, Franco-German friendship of the closeness we see today would certainly have been unthinkable. Through school exchanges and town twinning schemes, millions of people have found new friends and somewhere else they can call home. Monsieur le Président de la République Française, Sehr geehrte Frau Bundeskanzlerin, It is 26 years since Helmut Kohl and François Mitterrand made a joint address to the European Parliament; you are the first heads of state or government, since then, to follow their example. In what are difficult times for Europe, when we have unprecedented challenges to deal with, you have come to Strasbourg to debate with the Members of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Deletions from Certified Alabama Brands
    Deletions From Certified Alabama Brands Brand Family Date Deleted Last Sales Date Manufacturer DURANT 12-May-04 11-Jun-04 ALLIANCE TOBACCO CORP BUENO 15-Jun-09 15-Jul-09 ALTERNATIVE BRANDS TRACKER 17-May-07 16-Jun-07 ALTERNATIVE BRANDS TRACKER 30-Sep-13 30-Oct-13 ALTERNATIVE BRANDS TUCSON 14-Aug-07 13-Sep-07 ALTERNATIVE BRANDS TUCSON 30-Sep-13 30-Oct-13 ALTERNATIVE BRANDS TUCSON (RYO) 17-May-07 16-Jun-07 ALTERNATIVE BRANDS VICTORY BRAND 12-May-04 11-Jun-04 ALTERNATIVE BRANDS UNION 19-Jun-13 19-Jul-13 AMERICAN CIGARETTE COMPANY, INC. US ONE 19-Jun-13 19-Jul-13 AMERICAN CIGARETTE COMPANY, INC. SAVANNAH 26-May-05 25-Jun-05 ANDERSON TOBACCO COMPANY LLC SOUTHERN CLASSIC 12-May-04 11-Jun-04 ARGENSHIP PARAGUAY S A THE BRAVE 10-Jun-06 10-Jul-06 BEKENTON USA RALEIGH EXTRA 17-Mar-04 16-Apr-04 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION CORONAS 10-May-06 09-Jun-06 CANARY ISLANDS CIGARS COMPANY PALACE 10-May-06 09-Jun-06 CANARY ISLANDS CIGARS COMPANY RECORD 10-May-06 09-Jun-06 CANARY ISLANDS CIGARS COMPANY VL 10-May-06 09-Jun-06 CANARY ISLANDS CIGARS COMPANY KINGSBORO 18-Jul-10 17-Aug-10 CAROLINA TOBACCO COMPANY ROGER 18-Jul-10 17-Aug-10 CAROLINA TOBACCO COMPANY DAVENPORT 26-May-05 25-Jun-05 CARRIBBEAN-AMERICAN TOBACCO CORP FREEMONT 21-May-08 20-Jun-08 CARRIBBEAN-AMERICAN TOBACCO CORP KINGSLEY 26-May-05 25-Jun-05 CENTURION INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO DE CIGARROS 901'Z 07-Jun-11 07-Jul-11 CHEYENNE INTERNATIONAL LLC CAYMAN 07-Jun-11 07-Jul-11 CHEYENNE INTERNATIONAL LLC PULSE 07-Jun-11 07-Jul-11 CHEYENNE INTERNATIONAL LLC CT 07-May-04 06-Jun-04 CIGTEC TOBACCO LLC
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 October 2, 2018 Commission File Number: 001-38159 BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO P.L.C. (Translation of registrant’s name into English) Globe House 4 Temple Place London WC2R 2PG United Kingdom (Address of principal executive office) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F ☒ Form 40-F ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ☐ The information contained in this Form 6-K is incorporated by reference into the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statements File Nos. 333-223678 and 333-219440 and related Prospectuses, as such Registration Statements and Prospectuses may be amended from time to time. British American Tobacco p.l.c. (the “Company” or “BAT”) is furnishing herewith revised financial statements in their entirety and other affected financial information which supersede the equivalent information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 15, 2018 (the “Form 20-F”).
    [Show full text]