DOCSLIB.ORG

Highway Safety Plan for Federal Fiscal Year 2022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highway Safety Plan for Federal Fiscal Year 2022 Success through partnerships Montana Section 402 Highway Safety Plan for Federal Fiscal Year 2022 Prepared by: Montana Department of Transportation State Highway Traffic Safety Section PO Box 201001/2701 Prospect Avenue Helena, Montana 59601 Online at http://www.mdt.mt.gov/visionzero/plans/safetyprg.shtml Table of Contents 1. MONTANA SHTSS PROGRAM OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. LEGISLATIVE SESSION ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. HIGHWAY SAFETY PLANNING PROCESS .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Outline of Montana’s Highway Safety Planning Process .............................................................................................. 4 3.2 Performance Measure and Target Setting Process ....................................................................................................... 6 3.3 State Highway Problem Identification .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.3.1 State Demographic Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Project Selection Process ............................................................................................................................................ 12 3.5 Data Sources ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.6 Coordination with the CHSP ........................................................................................................................................ 14 3.7 Strategic Partners and Participants ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.7.1 Montana Highway Patrol ..................................................................................................................................... 17 3.7.2 State and Local DUI Courts .................................................................................................................................. 17 3.7.3 Local Law Enforcement ........................................................................................................................................ 17 3.7.4 Family, Career and Community Leaders of America (FCCLA) ............................................................................... 18 3.7.5 Northern Tribes DUI Task Force ........................................................................................................................... 18 4. PERFORMANCE MEASURES .......................................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 NHTSA Core Performance Measures .......................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 Standard Goal Statements .......................................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 Performance Plan 2021 to 2025 ................................................................................................................................. 20 4.4 Performance Report of 2019 Target ........................................................................................................................... 21 4.5 Media Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 4.5.1 Post Campaign – Labor Day Mobilization ............................................................................................................ 24 HIGHWAY SAFETY STRATEGIES AND PROJECTS ...................................................................................................................... 25 5. OCCUPANT PROTECTION PROGRAM AREA ....................................................................................................................... 25 5.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 5.2 Problem Identification ................................................................................................................................................ 27 5.3 Associated Performance Measure(s) .......................................................................................................................... 28 5.4 CHSP Linkage ............................................................................................................................................................... 28 5.5 Evidence of Effectiveness/Countermeasures that Work ............................................................................................ 30 5.6 Occupant Protection Planned Activities ..................................................................................................................... 30 5.6.1 Buckle Up Montana (BUMT) ................................................................................................................................ 30 5.6.2 Occupant Protection Mini‐Grants ........................................................................................................................ 31 5.6.3 CPS Technician and Instructor Development ....................................................................................................... 32 5.6.4 Child Passenger Safety Seats ............................................................................................................................... 32 5.6 Funding Summary for Occupant Protection ............................................................................................................... 33 6. LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES ...................................................................................................................................... 33 6.1 Mobilizations ............................................................................................................................................................... 33 6.2 Evidence Based Traffic Safety Enforcement Program ................................................................................................. 34 6.2.1 Effectiveness Monitoring ..................................................................................................................................... 35 6.2.2 Enforcement Plans ............................................................................................................................................... 35 6.2.3 High Visibility Enforcement Strategies to Support National Mobilizations ......................................................... 36 6.3 Associated Performance Measure(s) .......................................................................................................................... 36 6.4 CHSP Linkage ............................................................................................................................................................... 36 6.5 Evidence of Effectiveness/Countermeasures that Work ............................................................................................ 37 6.6 Enforcement Traffic Services Planned Activities ......................................................................................................... 38 6.6.1 Selective Traffic Enforcement Program ................................................................................................................ 39 6.6.2 STEP Mini‐Grants ................................................................................................................................................. 42 6.6.3 Law Enforcement Liaison ..................................................................................................................................... 42 6.6.4. Safety Enforcement Traffic Team (SETT) ............................................................................................................. 43 6.6.5 Traffic Safety Resource Officer ............................................................................................................................. 43 6.6.6 Helena Police Traffic Safety Pilot ......................................................................................................................... 44 6.6.7 24/7 Program ....................................................................................................................................................... 45 6.7 Funding Summary for Law Enforcement Traffic Services Planned Activities .............................................................. 46 7. IMPAIRED DRIVING PROGRAM ...................................................................................................................................... 46 7.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio State Troopers Association
    Table of Contents ARTICLE 1 - AGREEMENT ........................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 2 - EFFECT OF AGREEMENT .................................................... 1 ARTICLE 3 - CONFLICT AND AMENDMENT .......................................... 1 ARTICLE 4 - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS ...................................................... 2 ARTICLE 5 - UNION RECOGNITION AND SECURITY .......................... 2 5.01 Bargaining Unit ..................................................................................... 2 5.02 Resolution of Dispute ............................................................................ 2 5.03 Bargaining Unit Work ........................................................................... 3 ARTICLE 6 - NO STRIKE PROVISION ....................................................... 3 6.01 Union Prohibition .................................................................................. 3 6.02 Affirmative Duty ................................................................................... 3 6.03 Disciplinary Actions .............................................................................. 3 6.04 Employer Prohibition ............................................................................ 3 ARTICLE 7 - NON-DISCRIMINATION ........................................................ 3 ARTICLE 8 - OSTA TIME .............................................................................. 4 8.01 Union Delegate and Officer Leave ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Service Patrol Handbook
    FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE PATROL HANDBOOK November 2008 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the department of transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-08-031 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Service Patrol Handbook November 2008 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Nancy Houston, Craig Baldwin, Andrea Vann Easton, Steve Cyra, P.E., P.T.O.E., Marc Hustad, P.E., Katie Belmore, EIT 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Booz Allen Hamilton HNTB Corporation 8283 Greensboro Drive 11414 West Park Place, Suite 300 McLean, Virginia 22102 Milwaukee, WI 53224 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration, HOTO-1 Final Report U. S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20590 HOTO, FHWA 15. Supplementary Notes Paul Sullivan, FHWA Office of Operations, Office of Transportation Operations, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). Handbook development was performed under contract to Booz Allen Hamilton. 16. Abstract This Handbook provides an overview of the Full-Function Service Patrol (FFSP) and describes desired program characteristics from the viewpoint of an agency that is responsible for funding, managing, and operating the services.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Highway Safety
    Washington State Highway Safety version 1.0 Return to Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................2 Legislative Update .........................................................................................................................4 Fiscal Overview of Obligations and Expenditures ..............................................................................10 Assessment of State Progress .....................................................................................................................11 Program Updates Impaired Driving ..........................................................................................................................14 Speeding ........................................................................................................................................25 Young Drivers ...............................................................................................................................28 Distracted Driving .......................................................................................................................31 Trac Records ..............................................................................................................................34 Occupant Protection .................................................................................................................38 Motorcycles ..................................................................................................................................44
    [Show full text]
  • San Diegd Police Department San Diego, California
    03-35 SAN DIEGD POLICE DEPARTMENT SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA C/5 C 3 5 Project Summary: Drag-Net San Diego Police Department The Problem: Illegal motor vehicle speed contests, commonly known as street races, throughout the City of San Diego. Analysis: Officers developed a knowledge of the street-racing culture through undercover investigations, interviews with officers who had experience dealing with racers, monitoring Internet websites, interviewing racers, and exploring the legal alternatives that are available. Officers studied data on calls for service, traffic collisions, arrests, and citations related to illegal speed contests. Officers established baseline figures to determine the size of the problem. They identified collateral crimes that were occurring because of the problem. The officers set goals of reducing incidents of street racing to a level that it could be managed with existing resources and to reduce the number of illegally modified vehicles on the roadways. The most important analysis the officers made was whether they could impact the problem, despite its magnitude and history of indifference by society. They realized they had to change society's paradigm about street racing. The Drag-Net Officers decided they would only be successful if they truly made San Diego a safer place. They knew lives could be saved if their analysis was accurate, and the response was effective. Response: Officers used a multi-faceted approach in a comprehensive response strategy: • Undercover operations to identify, apprehend, and prosecute racers
    [Show full text]
  • Rank State Population Troopers Per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida
    Rank State Population Troopers per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida 18,801,000 8.473 1593 2 Georgia 9,688,000 8.237 798 3 Delaware 898,000 7.272 653 4 Alaska 710,000 5.451 387 5 Vermont 626,000 5.224 327 6 West Virginia 1,853,000 3.756 696 7 Wyoming 564,000 3.475 196 8 Pennsylvania 12,702,000 3.458 4392 9 Massachusetts 6,548,000 3.129 2049 10 New Jersey 8,792,000 3.11 2734 11 Connecticut 3,574,000 3.022 1080 12 New Mexico 2,059,000 2.632 542 13 Montana 989,000 2.568 254 14 Nebraska 1,826,000 2.568 469 15 New Hampshire 1,316,000 2.492 328 16 Maryland 5,774,000 2.473 1428 17 Maine 1,328,000 2.402 319 18 New York 19,378,000 2.333 4521 19 Virginia 8,001,000 2.307 1846 20 North Dakota 673,000 2.199 148 21 Louisiana 4,533,000 2.16 979 22 Oklahoma 3,751,000 2.127 798 23 California 37,254,000 2.086 7773 24 Rhode Island 1,053,000 2.061 217 25 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 26 Missouri 5,989,000 2.047 1226 27 South Dakota 814,000 1.99 162 28 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 29 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 30 Indiana 6,484,000 1.883 1221 31 Michigan 9,884,000 1.817 1796 32 Kansas 2,853,000 1.791 511 33 Nevada 2,701,000 1.785 462 34 North Carolina 9,535,000 1.769 1687 35 South Carolina 4,625,000 1.745 807 36 Oregon 3,831,000 1.731 663 37 Idaho 1,568,000 1.665 261 38 Utah 2,764,000 1.606 444 39 Washington 6,725,000 1.573 1058 40 Arizona 6,392,000 1.492 954 41 Illinois 12,831,000 1.483 1903 42 Colorado 5,029,000 1.469 739 43 Alabama 4,780,000 1.391 665 44 Texas 25,146,000 1.375 3457 45 Ohio 11,537,000 1.252 1445 46 Iowa 3,046,000 1.244 379 47 Tennessee 6,346,000
    [Show full text]
  • Motorist Assistance Program Is Available 511 in the Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, and Or Visit Salina Metro Areas
    TROOP HEADQUARTERS Troop A - Olathe (913) 782-8100 EMERGENCY Troop B - Topeka (785) 296-3102 PHONE NUMBERS Troop C - Salina You can easily contact the Kansas Highway (785) 827-3065 Patrol Communications Center while traveling. Troop D - Hays These phone numbers can be dialed on your (785) 625-3518 cell phone to report a vehicle breakdown, emergency, accident, erratic driver, or criminal Troop E - Garden City activity: (620) 276-3201 *47 to reach the Kansas Highway Patrol Troop F - Wichita (316) 744-0451 (582) while on the Kansas Turnpike *KTA Troop G - Turnpike (316) 682-4357 ROAD OR WEATHER Troop H - Chanute CONDITIONS (620) 431-2100 To obtain road construction information or inclement weather updates, please call The Motorist Assistance Program is available 511 in the Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, and or visit www.KanDrive.org Salina metro areas. Travelers on the Kansas Turnpike during the summer months will be assisted by a State Farm Safety Assist vehicle. Technicians will provide only immediate services needed to ensure the safety of Kansas Turnpike Authority customers 122 SW 7th Street and the safe movement of traffic. This program Topeka, KS 66603 is not affiliated with the Kansas Highway Patrol www.KansasHighwayPatrol.org Motorist Assistance Program. KHP civilian motorist assistance technicians aid motorists and help manage traffic in high traffic metro areas by removing disabled and abandoned vehicles from the roadway. PROGRAM GOALS Disabled vehicles on our major highways cause numerous problems when it comes to public safety. To address these problems, the Kansas WHAT TO DO IF YOUR Highway Patrol (KHP) and the Kansas Department VEHICLE BREAKS DOWN of Transportation (KDOT) established a Motorist Assistance Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana FY2021 Highway Safety Plan Annual Report
    SSSuccessSuuucccccceeessssss throughttthhhrrrooouuuggghhh partnershipspppaaarrrtttnnneeerrrssshhhiiipppsss Montana Section 402 Highway Safety Plan for Federal Fiscal Year 2021 Prepared by: Montana Department of Transportation State Highway Traffic Safety Section PO Box 201001/2701 Prospect Avenue Helena, Montana 59601 Online at http://www.mdt.mt.gov/visionzero/plans/safetyprg.shtml Table f C ntents 1. MONTANA SHTSS PROGRAM OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. LEGISLATIVE SESSION ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. HIGHWAY SAFETY PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 Outline of Montana’s Highway Safety Planning Process .......................................................................................... 3 3.1.2 Performance Measure and Target Setting Process ........................................................................................... 4 3.3. State Highway Problem Identification .................................................................................................................... 5 3.3.1 State Demographic Analysis............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Tickets and Other Violations
    TRAFFIC TICKETS AND OTHER VIOLATIONS Receiving a traffic citation can be stressful and intimidating. This section discusses some common concerns regarding traffic citations and other traffic violations. IF YOU ARE STOPPED The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) suggests that drivers turn on their right turn signals immediately after an officer alerts them to pull over. Officers will alert a driver to pull over by turning on flashing lights on their patrol car. The driver should pull over as far to the right as possible, and should proceed in a safe manner. It is important for the driver to stay calm. The DMV recommends that when pulling over, drivers should discontinue cell phone use, turn off the radio, and place both hands on the steering wheel. Placing both hands on the steering wheel will allow the officer to see that the driver is not holding a weapon. Drivers should have their driver’s license, registration, and proof of insurance easily accessible to present to an officer during a traffic stop. If the officer issues a citation, the driver does not admit guilt by signing the ticket. Instead, by signing the ticket, the driver promises to appear in court. In many instances, citations can be handled by mail. COURTESY NOTICES The Superior Court of California, County of San Diego – Traffic/Minor Offenses Division has jurisdiction over Vehicle Code infractions occurring in San Diego County. Most traffic citations are based on violations of the Vehicle Code. The court will usually mail a courtesy notice to the driver about two weeks before the court appearance date indicated on the ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Governmental Studies and Services Final Report Montana
    Division of Governmental Studies and Services Division of Governmental Studies and Services Final Report June 30, 2016 Montana Highway Patrol MHP Traffic Stop Data Analysis Michael Gaffney, J.D. Director, Division of Governmental Studies & Services Washington State University Christina Sanders, MPA Associate Director, DGSS Season A. Hoard, Ph.D. Research Coordinator, DGSS John S. Snyder, J.D. Community Outreach Specialist, DGSS 1 Division of Governmental Studies and Services Executive Summary The Division of Governmental Studies and Services (DGSS), jointly sponsored by WSU Extension and the College of Arts and Sciences, has served as a link between Washington State University resources and the population of the Pacific Northwest for over 50 years. DGSS serves the University’s land grant mission through applied social science research, program evaluation, technical assistance and training, which provides University resources for public benefit. Our extensive experience in program evaluation, survey research, data analysis, and community engagement extends to several analyses examining biased policing in the region, with experience analyzing secondary data as well as collecting primary data on this important subject area. The Montana Highway Patrol (MHP) contracted with DGSS for annual assessments of traffic stop data for evidence of biased policing. The contract, executed in January 2016, requires 5 annual assessments of MHP traffic stop data collected from traffic enforcement activities conducted from 2015 to 2019 to assess for possible evidence of systemic bias in the decisions of MHP troopers to stop motorists in the state of Montana. The first analysis, which is the subject of this report, examined all traffic stops occurring from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Tech: "Click It Or Ticket" Evaluation, 2008–2009
    TRAFFIC TECH Technology Transfer Series DOT HS 811 537 June 2013 Click It or Ticket Evaluation, 2008–2009 Click It or Ticket (CIOT) is a high-visibility enforcement use laws and enforcement of belt use laws remained program to increase seat belt use. Click It or Ticket was relatively strong. Support for a primary law remains adopted as a national program in 2003 and is credited strong; 72 percent in 2008 and 75 percent in 2009. with steady increases in seat belt use across the Nation. In 2009, seat belt use rates exceeded 90 percent in 14 Enforcement Activity States; Michigan had the highest rate of 98 percent. Not The 2008 CIOT campaign continued a four-year decline every driver buckled up on every trip, however, and in the number of seat belt citations issued. The 50 States some States lagged significantly behind the national and the District of Columbia reported a combined total belt rate of 84 percent in 2009. Seat belt use was below of 583,372 seat belt citations issued in 2008, and 570,545 80 percent in 14 States including two States that were in 2009, or 19 citations per 10K population. While lower, below 70 percent. NHTSA coordinated the 2008 and this citation rate is comparable to the citation rate of 2009 CIOT campaigns to encourage more improve- past successful CIOT programs (20 citations per 10K). ments in all 50 States and the District of Columbia. Table 1: State and DC Reported CIOT Activity 2003–2009 Paid Advertising and Public Awareness CIOT Law Enforcement Seat Belt Citations Belt Citations The level of paid advertising was less than previous Year Agencies Issued per 10K mobilizations mainly because an extended television 2003 10,506 508,492 18 2004 13,173 657,305 22 writers’ strike affected purchase plans in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Corridor Safety Program—A Collaborative Approach to Traffic Safety
    CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Corridor Safety Program—A Collaborative Approach to Traffic Safety Judge's Commentary The focus of most problem-oriented projects is crime, but it might just as well be any other of the recurring problems dealt with by police. In fact, this year's winner of the Goldstein Award was focused on a traffic problem—a high rate of fatal accidents on a particular stretch of rural highway in California. The projects' novelty was one reason for its selection. Another was that it was focused on an important, life-threaten- ing problem. However, judges liked many other things about the project, including the following: • Scanning was unusually rigorous. The stretch of highway, or corridor, was selected from among 550 qualifying roadway segments on the basis of its high rate of collisions and fatalities during a three-year period. A particu- Summary larly serious accident resulted in its The Problem: California State Routes (SR) being given high priority for treatment 41 and 46 are rural east-west highways con- by the California Highway Patrol. necting California's Central Valley to the central coast region. After a particularly seri- • Analysis consisted of a detailed review ous multiple fatality collision in 1995, the of accident data, together with input local community asked the California from a task force of state and local Highway Patrol (CHP) to assist them in stakeholders who made a daylong visit reducing such tragic incidents along this to the roadway to see the problem first corridor. A brief look at the collision picture hand. The principal factors involved in along the corridor confirmed the need to act the different kinds of collisions were quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Nighttime Enforcement of Seat Belt Laws: an Evaluation of Three Community Programs This Publication Is Distributed by the U.S
    Nighttime Enforcement Of Seat Belt Laws: An Evaluation of Three Community Programs This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers’ names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 811 189 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date August 2009 Nighttime Enforcement of Seat Belt Laws: An Evaluation of Three Community Programs 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mark G. Solomon, Robert H. B. Chaffe, David F. Preusser 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Preusser Research Group, Inc. 7100 Main Street Trumbull, CT 06611 11. Contract or Grant No. DTNH22-05-C-05094 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation September 2005 – March National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2009 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Alan Block served as the NHTSA Contracting Officer's Technical Representative for the study.
    [Show full text]