DOCSLIB.ORG

Rank State Population Troopers Per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rank State Population Troopers Per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida Rank State Population Troopers per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida 18,801,000 8.473 1593 2 Georgia 9,688,000 8.237 798 3 Delaware 898,000 7.272 653 4 Alaska 710,000 5.451 387 5 Vermont 626,000 5.224 327 6 West Virginia 1,853,000 3.756 696 7 Wyoming 564,000 3.475 196 8 Pennsylvania 12,702,000 3.458 4392 9 Massachusetts 6,548,000 3.129 2049 10 New Jersey 8,792,000 3.11 2734 11 Connecticut 3,574,000 3.022 1080 12 New Mexico 2,059,000 2.632 542 13 Montana 989,000 2.568 254 14 Nebraska 1,826,000 2.568 469 15 New Hampshire 1,316,000 2.492 328 16 Maryland 5,774,000 2.473 1428 17 Maine 1,328,000 2.402 319 18 New York 19,378,000 2.333 4521 19 Virginia 8,001,000 2.307 1846 20 North Dakota 673,000 2.199 148 21 Louisiana 4,533,000 2.16 979 22 Oklahoma 3,751,000 2.127 798 23 California 37,254,000 2.086 7773 24 Rhode Island 1,053,000 2.061 217 25 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 26 Missouri 5,989,000 2.047 1226 27 South Dakota 814,000 1.99 162 28 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 29 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 30 Indiana 6,484,000 1.883 1221 31 Michigan 9,884,000 1.817 1796 32 Kansas 2,853,000 1.791 511 33 Nevada 2,701,000 1.785 462 34 North Carolina 9,535,000 1.769 1687 35 South Carolina 4,625,000 1.745 807 36 Oregon 3,831,000 1.731 663 37 Idaho 1,568,000 1.665 261 38 Utah 2,764,000 1.606 444 39 Washington 6,725,000 1.573 1058 40 Arizona 6,392,000 1.492 954 41 Illinois 12,831,000 1.483 1903 42 Colorado 5,029,000 1.469 739 43 Alabama 4,780,000 1.391 665 44 Texas 25,146,000 1.375 3457 45 Ohio 11,537,000 1.252 1445 46 Iowa 3,046,000 1.244 379 47 Tennessee 6,346,000 1.232 782 48 Minnesota 5,304,000 1.067 566 49 Wisconsin 5,687,000 0.7227 411 Bordering States Rank State Population Troopers per Capita Total Troopers 1 Nebraska 1,826,000 2.568 469 2 Missouri 5,989,000 2.047 1226 3 South Dakota 814,000 1.99 162 4 Kansas 2,853,000 1.791 511 5 Illinois 12,831,000 1.483 1903 6 Iowa 3,046,000 1.244 379 7 Minnesota 5,304,000 1.067 566 8 Wisconsin 5,687,000 0.7227 411 States Similiar in Population Rank State Population Troopers per Capita Total Troopers 1 Connecticut 3,574,000 3.022 1080 2 New Mexico 2,059,000 2.632 542 3 Nebraska 1,826,000 2.568 469 4 Louisiana 4,533,000 2.16 979 5 Oklahoma 3,751,000 2.127 798 6 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 7 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 8 Kansas 2,853,000 1.791 511 9 Nevada 2,701,000 1.785 462 10 South Carolina 4,625,000 1.745 807 11 Oregon 3,831,000 1.731 663 12 Utah 2,764,000 1.606 444 13 Iowa 3,046,000 1.244 379 Survey of State Police and Patrol Note: N/A indicates a ranking Completed by Ohio State Highway Patrol Number of Sworn Personnel by State Feb. 2007 Dec. 2011 # # Alabama Colonel 1 1 Lt. Colonel 1 1 Major 7 5 Captain 20 22 Lieutenant 36 35 Sergeant 48 53 Corporal 92 118 Trooper 502 424 Trooper Pilot n/a 6 Total 707 665 Alaska Director (Colonel) 1 1 Deputy Director (Major) 1 1 Administrative Commander (Major) 1 0 Captain 9 10 Lieutenant 20 20 Sergeant 55 57 Corporal (Academy Instructor) 6 8 Trooper 242 231 Court Services Officer 46 59 Total 381 387 Arizona Director 1 n/a Deputy Director 1 n/a Chief 3 n/a Colonel n/a 1 Lt. Colonel n/a 4 Commander (now Major) 19 9 Lieutenant (now Captain) 44 39 Sergeant II 111 n/a Sergeant I 79 n/a Sergeant n/a 161 Officer 872 739 Motor Carrier Investigator n/a 1 Cadet Officer 28 n/a Aviation Administrator 1 n/a Fixed Wing Pilot I 1 n/a Fixed Wing Pilot II 3 n/a Rotary Wing Pilot I 5 n/a Rotary Wing Pilot II 14 n/a Total 1182 954 Arkansas Colonel 1 Major 4 Captain 15 Lieutenant 26 Sergeant 63 Corporal 249 Trooper 1st Class 50 Trooper 80 Trainer 31 Cadet 35 Total 554 California Commissioner 1 1 Assistant Commissioner 3 3 Chief 15 12 Assistant Chief 32 33 Captain 90 92 Lieutenant 206 218 Sergeant 786 835 Officer 5593 6579 Total 6726 7773 Colorado Chief 1 1 Lt. Colonel 3 3 Major 10 9 Captain 27 29 Sergeant 88 97 Corporal 96 n/a Trooper III n/a 203 Trooper 431 358 Patrol Intern 61 39 Total 717 739 Connecticut Commissioner 1 1 Deputy Commissioner (Colonel) 0 1 Lt. Colonel 2 2 Major 7 9 Captain 14 8 Lieutenant 37 30 Master Sergeant 13 13 Sergeant 179 168 Trooper First Class 626 566 Trooper 290 282 Trooper Trainee 2 n/a Trainee 35 n/a Total 1206 1080 Delaware Colonel 1 1 Lt. Colonel 1 1 Major 5 4 Captain 19 18 Lieutenant 37 33 Sergeant 85 87 Master Corp 144 171 Senior Corp 52 74 Corporal/1 102 75 Corporal 101 113 TFC 56 41 Trooper 45 25 Recruit 19 10 Total 667 653 Florida Colonel 1 1 Lt. Colonel 4 1 Chief EOC/Domestic Security 1 n/a Chief of Investigations 1 n/a Chief n/a 3 Troop Commander 10 n/a Major 5 14 Captain 51 49 Lieutenant 134 127 Sergeant 220 230 Corporals 216 n/a Troopers 1193 1168 Total 1836 1593 Georgia Colonel 1 Lt. Colonel 1 Major 3 Captain 18 Lieutenant 28 Sergeant First Class 58 Sergeant 65 Corporal 72 Trooper 552 Total 798 Hawaii Does not have a state level agency Idaho Colonel n/a 1 Major 2 3 Captain 9 11 Lieutenant 13 16 Sergeant 36 37 Specialist 70 58 Trooper 164 135 Total 294 261 Illinois Colonel 5 5 Lt. Colonel 5 7 Captain 41 33 Lieutenant 74 62 Master Sergeant 283 255 Sergeant 327 204 Special Agent 183 239 Trooper 1119 1033 Cadet n/a 65 Total 2037 1903 Indiana Superintendent 1 1 Colonel 1 1 Lt. Colonel 3 4 Major 13 14 Captain 16 19 Lieutenant 37 41 Sergeant Major n/a 1 First Sergeant 56 58 Sergeant 183 200 Corporal 36 23 Probationary Officer 61 43 Master Trooper 213 262 Senior Trooper 131 207 Trooper 385 347 Total 1136 1221 Iowa Colonel 1 1 Major 2 2 Captain 8 8 Lieutenant 11 16 Sergeant 56 51 Trooper /Trooper II and III 335 287 Capital Patrol Officer/Trooper I 23 23 Total 436 388 Kansas Colonel 1 1 Lt. Colonel 1 1 Major n/a 4 Captain 19 18 Lieutenant 72 74 Master Trooper 121 n/a Master/Technical Trooper n/a 263 Trooper 176 94 Technical Trooper 75 n/a LEO/CASP I 40 8 LEO/MCI I 40 4 MCI I 7 n/a MCI II 31 19 MCI III n/a 7 CASP LT n/a 2 CASP II n/a 11 CASP III n/a 5 Total 583 511 Kentucky Lt. Colonel 3 4 Major 7 7 Captain 34 26 Lieutenant 51 50 Sergeant 121 120 Trooper 722 678 Retired Contract Troopers n/a 6 Total 938 891 Louisiana Colonel n/a 1 Chief of Staff/Lt. Colonel n/a 1 Lt. Colonel n/a 3 Deputy Superintendent 6 n/a Deputy Secretary 1 n/a Command Pilot 1 n/a Deputy Commander 1 n/a Major 7 8 Captain 25 23 Lieutenant 89 98 Master Pilot 4 n/a Master Trooper 222 n/a Polygraphist 2 n/a Sergeant 190 192 Technical Supervisor 2 n/a Pilot 4 n/a Trooper 398 636 Cadet 42 n/a Other Specialty Positions (e.g., polygraphist) n/a 17 Total 994 979 Maine Colonel 1 Lt. Colonel 1 Major 2 Corporal 4 Detective 41 Forensic Specialist 1 Lieutenant 18 Sergeant 48 Pilot 1 Pilot Supervisor 1 Polygraph Examiner Supervisor 1 Polygraph Examiner 2 Trooper 198 Total 319 Maryland Colonel 1 0 Lt. Colonel 3 3 Major 8 9 Captain 26 23 Lieutenant 53 49 First and Detective Sergeants 113 77 Sergeant 275 266 Corporal 166 201 TFC 562 381 Trooper 319 419 Total 1526 1428 Massachusetts Colonel 1 1 Deputy Superintendent (Lt. Colonel) 1 1 Lt. Colonel 3 3 Major 17 14 Detective Captain 3 3 Captain 35 25 Detective Lieutenant 35 33 Lieutenant 187 142 Sergeant 371 303 Trooper 1,865 1524 Total 2518 2049 Michigan Executive Command 6 Captain 16 Inspector 15 First Lieutenant 104 Lieutenant 30 Detective Lieutenant 64 Detective/Specialist Sergeant 219 Sergeant 258 Trooper 1084 Total 1796 Minnesota Colonel (Chief) 1 1 Lt. Colonel (Assistant Chief) 1 1 Major 4 4 Captain 17 16 Lieutenant 43 52 Sergeant 124 67 Trooper 371 425 Total 561 566 Mississippi Colonel 1 Lt. Colonel 3 Major 5 Captain 20 Lieutenant 40 HP Officer (Trooper) 516 Total 585 Missouri Colonel 1 1 Lt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MICHIGAN STATE POLICE Act 59 of 1935
    CHAPTER 28. MICHIGAN STATE POLICE MICHIGAN STATE POLICE Act 59 of 1935 AN ACT to provide for the public safety; to create the Michigan state police, and provide for the organization thereof; to transfer thereto the offices, duties and powers of the state fire marshal, the state oil inspector, the department of the Michigan state police as heretofore organized, and the department of public safety; to create the office of commissioner of the Michigan state police; to provide for an acting commissioner and for the appointment of the officers and members of said department; to prescribe their powers, duties, and immunities; to provide the manner of fixing their compensation; to provide for their removal from office; and to repeal Act No. 26 of the Public Acts of 1919, being sections 556 to 562, inclusive, of the Compiled Laws of 1929, and Act No. 123 of the Public Acts of 1921, as amended, being sections 545 to 555, inclusive, of the Compiled Laws of 1929. History: 1935, Act 59, Imd. Eff. May 17, 1935;Am. 1939, Act 152, Eff. Sept. 29, 1939. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 28.1 Michigan state police; definitions. Sec. 1. As employed in this act, the following words or terms shall be understood to mean: (a) The word "commissioner" shall mean commissioner or commanding officer of the Michigan state police. (b) "Acting commissioner" shall mean the acting commissioner or commanding officer of the Michigan state police. (c) "Officer" shall mean any member of the Michigan state police executing the constitutional oath of office.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court
    Case 1:10-cv-00303-OWW -GSA Document 7 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GODINEZ, ) 1:10-cv-303 OWW GSA 11 ) ) 12 ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff, ) REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN 13 ) CLAIMS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND v. ) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO 14 ) AMEND OTHER CLAIMS FELIX M. LARA, FRESNO CALIFORNIA ) 15 HIGHWAY PATROL, VISALIA ) COUNTY HIGHWAY PATROL, TULARE ) 16 COUNTY HIGHWAY PATROL, TULARE ) COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, VISALIA ) 17 POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF ) VISALIA, JOHN DOES, 1-50, ) 18 ) Defendants. ) 19 ) 20 INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff, Richard Godinez, (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner, appearing pro se and proceeding 22 in forma pauperis, filed the instant complaint on February 22, 2010. Plaintiff alleges he was 23 unlawfully detained by police for a traffic infraction and was illegally arrested and beaten by 24 Defendants. Plaintiff files this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 based on 25 violations of the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 26 Plaintiff also alleges causes of action pursuant to California Civil Code § 52.1 and Article 1 § 13 27 of the California Constitution. Plaintiff names Felix M. Lara, Officer of the California Highway 28 1 Case 1:10-cv-00303-OWW -GSA Document 7 Filed 05/03/10 Page 2 of 17 1 Patrol (hereinafter “CHP”), the Fresno California Highway Patrol, the Visalia County Highway 2 Patrol, the Tulare County Highway Patrol, the Tulare County Sheriff’s Department, the Visalia 3 Police Department, the “chief head officer” from each of these government agencies, the City of 4 Visalia, and John Does 1-50.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio State Troopers Association
    Table of Contents ARTICLE 1 - AGREEMENT ........................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 2 - EFFECT OF AGREEMENT .................................................... 1 ARTICLE 3 - CONFLICT AND AMENDMENT .......................................... 1 ARTICLE 4 - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS ...................................................... 2 ARTICLE 5 - UNION RECOGNITION AND SECURITY .......................... 2 5.01 Bargaining Unit ..................................................................................... 2 5.02 Resolution of Dispute ............................................................................ 2 5.03 Bargaining Unit Work ........................................................................... 3 ARTICLE 6 - NO STRIKE PROVISION ....................................................... 3 6.01 Union Prohibition .................................................................................. 3 6.02 Affirmative Duty ................................................................................... 3 6.03 Disciplinary Actions .............................................................................. 3 6.04 Employer Prohibition ............................................................................ 3 ARTICLE 7 - NON-DISCRIMINATION ........................................................ 3 ARTICLE 8 - OSTA TIME .............................................................................. 4 8.01 Union Delegate and Officer Leave ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Service Patrol Handbook
    FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE PATROL HANDBOOK November 2008 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the department of transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-08-031 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Service Patrol Handbook November 2008 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Nancy Houston, Craig Baldwin, Andrea Vann Easton, Steve Cyra, P.E., P.T.O.E., Marc Hustad, P.E., Katie Belmore, EIT 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Booz Allen Hamilton HNTB Corporation 8283 Greensboro Drive 11414 West Park Place, Suite 300 McLean, Virginia 22102 Milwaukee, WI 53224 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration, HOTO-1 Final Report U. S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20590 HOTO, FHWA 15. Supplementary Notes Paul Sullivan, FHWA Office of Operations, Office of Transportation Operations, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). Handbook development was performed under contract to Booz Allen Hamilton. 16. Abstract This Handbook provides an overview of the Full-Function Service Patrol (FFSP) and describes desired program characteristics from the viewpoint of an agency that is responsible for funding, managing, and operating the services.
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Shoemaker V. Indiana State Police Department
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Ryan P. Sink Gregory F. Zoeller Indianapolis, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana Aaron T. Craft Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Ron Shoemaker, November 2, 2016 Appellant-Plaintiff, Court of Appeals Case No. 49A02-1604-PL-879 v. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court Indiana State Police The Honorable Gary L. Miller, Department, Judge Appellee-Defendant. Trial Court Cause No. 49D03-1408-PL-26357 Altice, Judge. Case Summary [1] Ronald Shoemaker, a law enforcement officer with the Indiana State Police Department (ISP) for well over twenty years, was demoted in rank and pay in 2013 shortly after a new Superintendent of ISP was appointed. Shoemaker believes that the demotion was the result of a whistleblower report he filed with Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 49A02-1604-PL-879 | November 2, 2016 Page 1 of 15 his supervisor about four years earlier. Pursuant to Ind. Code § 4-15-10-4, the Whistleblower Law (the WBL), Shoemaker initiated an administrative appeal of his demotion. After his action was dismissed by the administrative law judge (the ALJ) for being untimely filed, Shoemaker did not pursue judicial review of the administrative decision. He filed the instant breach of contract action instead. ISP sought summary judgment on the ground that Shoemaker failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and could not bring an action for breach of contract under the WBL.1 The trial court granted ISP’s motion for summary judgment, and Shoemaker
    [Show full text]
  • San Diegd Police Department San Diego, California
    03-35 SAN DIEGD POLICE DEPARTMENT SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA C/5 C 3 5 Project Summary: Drag-Net San Diego Police Department The Problem: Illegal motor vehicle speed contests, commonly known as street races, throughout the City of San Diego. Analysis: Officers developed a knowledge of the street-racing culture through undercover investigations, interviews with officers who had experience dealing with racers, monitoring Internet websites, interviewing racers, and exploring the legal alternatives that are available. Officers studied data on calls for service, traffic collisions, arrests, and citations related to illegal speed contests. Officers established baseline figures to determine the size of the problem. They identified collateral crimes that were occurring because of the problem. The officers set goals of reducing incidents of street racing to a level that it could be managed with existing resources and to reduce the number of illegally modified vehicles on the roadways. The most important analysis the officers made was whether they could impact the problem, despite its magnitude and history of indifference by society. They realized they had to change society's paradigm about street racing. The Drag-Net Officers decided they would only be successful if they truly made San Diego a safer place. They knew lives could be saved if their analysis was accurate, and the response was effective. Response: Officers used a multi-faceted approach in a comprehensive response strategy: • Undercover operations to identify, apprehend, and prosecute racers
    [Show full text]
  • Motorist Assistance Program Is Available 511 in the Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, and Or Visit Salina Metro Areas
    TROOP HEADQUARTERS Troop A - Olathe (913) 782-8100 EMERGENCY Troop B - Topeka (785) 296-3102 PHONE NUMBERS Troop C - Salina You can easily contact the Kansas Highway (785) 827-3065 Patrol Communications Center while traveling. Troop D - Hays These phone numbers can be dialed on your (785) 625-3518 cell phone to report a vehicle breakdown, emergency, accident, erratic driver, or criminal Troop E - Garden City activity: (620) 276-3201 *47 to reach the Kansas Highway Patrol Troop F - Wichita (316) 744-0451 (582) while on the Kansas Turnpike *KTA Troop G - Turnpike (316) 682-4357 ROAD OR WEATHER Troop H - Chanute CONDITIONS (620) 431-2100 To obtain road construction information or inclement weather updates, please call The Motorist Assistance Program is available 511 in the Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, and or visit www.KanDrive.org Salina metro areas. Travelers on the Kansas Turnpike during the summer months will be assisted by a State Farm Safety Assist vehicle. Technicians will provide only immediate services needed to ensure the safety of Kansas Turnpike Authority customers 122 SW 7th Street and the safe movement of traffic. This program Topeka, KS 66603 is not affiliated with the Kansas Highway Patrol www.KansasHighwayPatrol.org Motorist Assistance Program. KHP civilian motorist assistance technicians aid motorists and help manage traffic in high traffic metro areas by removing disabled and abandoned vehicles from the roadway. PROGRAM GOALS Disabled vehicles on our major highways cause numerous problems when it comes to public safety. To address these problems, the Kansas WHAT TO DO IF YOUR Highway Patrol (KHP) and the Kansas Department VEHICLE BREAKS DOWN of Transportation (KDOT) established a Motorist Assistance Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Tickets and Other Violations
    TRAFFIC TICKETS AND OTHER VIOLATIONS Receiving a traffic citation can be stressful and intimidating. This section discusses some common concerns regarding traffic citations and other traffic violations. IF YOU ARE STOPPED The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) suggests that drivers turn on their right turn signals immediately after an officer alerts them to pull over. Officers will alert a driver to pull over by turning on flashing lights on their patrol car. The driver should pull over as far to the right as possible, and should proceed in a safe manner. It is important for the driver to stay calm. The DMV recommends that when pulling over, drivers should discontinue cell phone use, turn off the radio, and place both hands on the steering wheel. Placing both hands on the steering wheel will allow the officer to see that the driver is not holding a weapon. Drivers should have their driver’s license, registration, and proof of insurance easily accessible to present to an officer during a traffic stop. If the officer issues a citation, the driver does not admit guilt by signing the ticket. Instead, by signing the ticket, the driver promises to appear in court. In many instances, citations can be handled by mail. COURTESY NOTICES The Superior Court of California, County of San Diego – Traffic/Minor Offenses Division has jurisdiction over Vehicle Code infractions occurring in San Diego County. Most traffic citations are based on violations of the Vehicle Code. The court will usually mail a courtesy notice to the driver about two weeks before the court appearance date indicated on the ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File, 139.89 KB
    Armed Forces Equivalent Ranks Order Men Women Royal New Zealand New Zealand Army Royal New Zealand New Zealand Naval New Zealand Royal New Zealand Navy: Women’s Air Force: Forces Army Air Force Royal New Zealand New Zealand Royal Women’s Auxilliary Naval Service Women’s Royal New Zealand Air Force Army Corps Nursing Corps Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Vice-Admiral Lieutenant-General Air Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Rear-Admiral Major-General Air Vice-Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Commodore, 1st and Brigadier Air Commodore No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent 2nd Class Captain Colonel Group Captain Superintendent Colonel Matron-in-Chief Group Officer Commander Lieutenant-Colonel Wing Commander Chief Officer Lieutenant-Colonel Principal Matron Wing Officer Lieutentant- Major Squadron Leader First Officer Major Matron Squadron Officer Commander Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Second Officer Captain Charge Sister Flight Officer Sub-Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer Senior Commis- sioned Officer Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer (Branch List) { { Pilot Officer Acting Pilot Officer Probationary Assistant Section Acting Sub-Lieuten- 2nd Lieutenant but junior to Third Officer 2nd Lieutenant No equivalent Officer ant Navy and Army { ranks) Commissioned Officer No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No
    [Show full text]
  • Jsp 800 Defence Movements and Transportation Regulations
    JSP 800 DEFENCE MOVEMENTS AND TRANSPORTATION REGULATIONS VOLUME 2 PASSENGER TRAVEL INSTRUCTIONS Third Edition By Command of the Defence Council MINISTRY OF DEFENCE January 2010 FOREWORD This document outlines the Joint Service Policy for movement of passengers and provides guidance to formations and units. This volume of JSP 800 is a ‘live’ publication and will be subject to amendment in order to keep it relevant. The travel instructions in this manual replace those formally published in the following areas: a. The previous edition of JSP 800 which should now be destroyed. b. Instructions previously covered in Defence Council Instructions (DCIs) and those DINs which expire on issue of this edition. Personal contact details of junior staff redacted under section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act The Sponsor of JSP 800 Volume 2 is the Deputy Head, SCM. Each Chapter of this volume has a Chapter Sponsor, identified in the contents list, and who is responsible for the maintenance of and update of the content via the process undertaken by the Defence Passenger Policy Committee and associated Working Groups . Chapter Sponsors should review their chapters, to ensure accuracy and relevance, and pass proposed amendments to the Technical Author who will aim to publish amendments to the intranet as a minimum on an annual basis. This volume will contain some reference to DCIs and DINs. It must be noted that these were the latest edition at the time of printing and may have been superseded. Some duplication necessarily exists between these instructions and those contained in other volumes of JSP 800 although this has been minimised.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey State Police Pipe Band
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. .. I'" ... .. .. W' _W' _. W' _W' w• •• ~ • ..- " - " ' .' - ;.' ;' . : - .' ; _. .---.. : .:::::" C-/?-~ r1()-7 () Y'~r- Q ~ ~ N ~ ... • NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE PIPE BAND Since its inception in February, 1986, the Pipe Band has appeared at numerous parades, dinners, retirement banquets and charity functions. The band has received many awards and "Certificates of Appreciation" for the professional and proficient manner in which they have performed. • :§tate of New 3Jer.s£u DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF STATE POLICE POST OFFICE BOX 7068 WEST TRENTON, NEW JERSEY 08628-0058 PETER N. PERREnl, Jr (609) 882-2000 COLONEL c.L. PAGANO Attorney General Superintendent July 1, 1989 The Honorable Peter N. Perretti, Jr. Attorney General State of New Jersey Sir: I respectfully submit the Annual Report of the Division of State Police for the fiscal year July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989, our sixty-eighth year of service to the people of New Jersey. I wish to express our gratitude to you for your confidence al1d support. Sincerely, Colonel Clinton L. Pagano 122930 U.S. Department of Justice Superintendent Nationallnslitute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarity represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material in mi­ crofiche only has been granted by New Jersey State police to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT UPDATE Protecting, Preventing, Providing Larry Hogan Boyd K
    Vol. 1, Issue 6, July 2018 IMPACT UPDATE Protecting, Preventing, Providing Larry Hogan Boyd K. Rutherford Colonel William Pallozzi Governor Lt. Governor Superintendent ‘Operation Broken Heart’ Yields 56 Arrests In Maryland Maryland State Police Investigators Arrest 21 Suspects In Three-Month Initiative (COLUMBIA, Md.) – Maryland’s Inter- operation, the task forces delivered more Contents net Crimes Against Children Task Force than 3,700 presentations on Internet safe- arrested 35 suspects in Maryland, nine of ty to over 390,000 youth and adults na- Easton Barrack starts whom were arrested by Maryland State tionally. “Lose the Booze” plan Police investigators, while participating in The Maryland ICAC Task Force is com- “Operation Broken Heart,” a nation- Trooper, Orioles Honor prised of police agencies statewide. They wide, three-month initiative that targeted Baltimore Students concentrated on those offenders who offenders involved in child sexual exploi- possess, manufacture, and distribute tation. MSP Participates In child pornography and who engage in Torch Run For Special The Maryland Internet Crimes Against online enticement of children for sexual Olympics Maryland Children Task Force (ICAC) was one of purposes. They also targeted crimes in- 61 task forces included in “Operation cluding child prostitution and violators MSP, VSP Enforce Broken Heart.” Members from the Mar- traveling abroad to sexually abuse foreign “Move Over” Law yland ICAC worked tirelessly throughout children. March, April and May, initiating 426 in- The primary mission of the Task Force Frederick Barrack vestigations. Investigators served 149 continues to be to protect children from Participates In “Border search warrants and made 56 arrests. computer-facilitated sexual exploitation.
    [Show full text]