IMPACT UPDATE Protecting, Preventing, Providing Larry Hogan Boyd K
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ron Shoemaker V. Indiana State Police Department
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Ryan P. Sink Gregory F. Zoeller Indianapolis, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana Aaron T. Craft Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Ron Shoemaker, November 2, 2016 Appellant-Plaintiff, Court of Appeals Case No. 49A02-1604-PL-879 v. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court Indiana State Police The Honorable Gary L. Miller, Department, Judge Appellee-Defendant. Trial Court Cause No. 49D03-1408-PL-26357 Altice, Judge. Case Summary [1] Ronald Shoemaker, a law enforcement officer with the Indiana State Police Department (ISP) for well over twenty years, was demoted in rank and pay in 2013 shortly after a new Superintendent of ISP was appointed. Shoemaker believes that the demotion was the result of a whistleblower report he filed with Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 49A02-1604-PL-879 | November 2, 2016 Page 1 of 15 his supervisor about four years earlier. Pursuant to Ind. Code § 4-15-10-4, the Whistleblower Law (the WBL), Shoemaker initiated an administrative appeal of his demotion. After his action was dismissed by the administrative law judge (the ALJ) for being untimely filed, Shoemaker did not pursue judicial review of the administrative decision. He filed the instant breach of contract action instead. ISP sought summary judgment on the ground that Shoemaker failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and could not bring an action for breach of contract under the WBL.1 The trial court granted ISP’s motion for summary judgment, and Shoemaker -
Rank State Population Troopers Per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida
Rank State Population Troopers per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida 18,801,000 8.473 1593 2 Georgia 9,688,000 8.237 798 3 Delaware 898,000 7.272 653 4 Alaska 710,000 5.451 387 5 Vermont 626,000 5.224 327 6 West Virginia 1,853,000 3.756 696 7 Wyoming 564,000 3.475 196 8 Pennsylvania 12,702,000 3.458 4392 9 Massachusetts 6,548,000 3.129 2049 10 New Jersey 8,792,000 3.11 2734 11 Connecticut 3,574,000 3.022 1080 12 New Mexico 2,059,000 2.632 542 13 Montana 989,000 2.568 254 14 Nebraska 1,826,000 2.568 469 15 New Hampshire 1,316,000 2.492 328 16 Maryland 5,774,000 2.473 1428 17 Maine 1,328,000 2.402 319 18 New York 19,378,000 2.333 4521 19 Virginia 8,001,000 2.307 1846 20 North Dakota 673,000 2.199 148 21 Louisiana 4,533,000 2.16 979 22 Oklahoma 3,751,000 2.127 798 23 California 37,254,000 2.086 7773 24 Rhode Island 1,053,000 2.061 217 25 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 26 Missouri 5,989,000 2.047 1226 27 South Dakota 814,000 1.99 162 28 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 29 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 30 Indiana 6,484,000 1.883 1221 31 Michigan 9,884,000 1.817 1796 32 Kansas 2,853,000 1.791 511 33 Nevada 2,701,000 1.785 462 34 North Carolina 9,535,000 1.769 1687 35 South Carolina 4,625,000 1.745 807 36 Oregon 3,831,000 1.731 663 37 Idaho 1,568,000 1.665 261 38 Utah 2,764,000 1.606 444 39 Washington 6,725,000 1.573 1058 40 Arizona 6,392,000 1.492 954 41 Illinois 12,831,000 1.483 1903 42 Colorado 5,029,000 1.469 739 43 Alabama 4,780,000 1.391 665 44 Texas 25,146,000 1.375 3457 45 Ohio 11,537,000 1.252 1445 46 Iowa 3,046,000 1.244 379 47 Tennessee 6,346,000 -
West Virginia State Police 2017-2018 Annual Report Colonel Jan Cahill
West Virginia State Police 2017-2018 Annual Report Colonel Jan Cahill, Superintendent West Virginia State Police FY 2017-2018 Annual Report WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE MISSION STATEMENT Statutory Mission: West Virginia Code §15-2-12(a): The West Virginia State Police shall have the mission of statewide enforcement of criminal and traffic laws with emphasis on providing basic enforcement and citizen protection from criminal depredation throughout the state and maintaining the safety of the state’s public streets, roads and highways. 1 West Virginia State Police FY 2017-2018 Annual Report 2 West Virginia State Police FY 2017-2018 Annual Report Colonel Jan L. Cahill Superintendent 3 West Virginia State Police FY 2017-2018 Annual Report 4 West Virginia State Police FY 2017-2018 Annual Report Organization Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6 Executive Staff ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Field Operations Troop 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Troop 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Troop 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Troop 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 -
State Repository Officials Responding to OTA User Survey Conducted in 1979
Appendix C . State Repository Officials Responding to OTA User Survey Conducted in 1979 The following individuals responded by letter State Name and agency and/or telephone interview to the OTA user Florida Robert L. Edwards, survey: Director Name and agency State Peggy Horvath, Alabama Eugene J. Akers, Manager Deputy Director Systems Development Division of Criminal Division Justice Information Alabama Criminal Justice Systems Information Center Florida Department of Alaska Sgt. Michael S. Radisch Law Enforcement CJIS Security Officer Georgia E. W. Manseau, Alaska State Troopers Deputy Director Department of Public Georgia Crime Information Safety Center Jack Piper Arizona Capt. W. Woodard Hawaii Honolulu City and County Arizona Department of Police Department Public Safety Illinois Dwight E. Bee Arkansas David Eberdt, Illinois Department of Law Administrator Enforcement Arkansas Criminal Justice Indiana Robert J. Stanton and Highway Safety Indiana State Police Information System Iowa Gary L. Stevens Maj. Buren Jackson Iowa Department of Public Arkansas State Police Safety California F. W. Johnston and Kansas Maj. Stuart A. Elliot Roy T. Iwata Kansas Highway Patrol Bureau of Identification Kentucky Mr. Kraing California Department of Kentucky State Police Justice Louisiana Lt. L. G. Finn Colorado W. Gray Buckley, Louisiana State Police Agent in Charge Maine Sgt. John H. Parkin, Jr. Crime Information Section Maine State Police Colorado Bureau of Maryland Louis Sakin Investigation Maryland Department of Public Safety and Delaware Benjamin -
State Highway Patrols-Their Functions and Financing
State Highway Patrols-Their Functions and Financing EDWARD A. GLADSTONE and THOMAS W. COOPER, U.S. Bureau of Public Roads, Office of Planning •CONCERN FOR the safety of the motoring public, and the importance of the state police organizations in enforcing traffic and safety laws, was voiced by the governors of most of the 47 states in which the legislatures met in regular session in 1965. In state after state the governor's message emphasized highway safety and pointed to the need for additional highway patrol troops to curb highway accidents and fatalities. In at least 30 states requests were made for an increase in patrol strength, either by the governor, by legislative committees, or by safety agencies. Collectively, specific requests were made in 21 states for nearly 3, 800 troopers to be added to the patrol strength within the next onP. to four years. A summary of the requests (as of mid-1965) is given in Table 1. If approved, these requests would increase patrol strength by an average of 23 percent. TAB LE 1 REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL PATROL TROOPERS, SUBMITTED TO 1965 STATE LEGISLATURES BY GOVERNORS, LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES, OR OTHERS Number Number St,it,,, (uhPr" stl\te~) State (where stated) Arkansas - New York 112 California 195 North Carolina 200 (4 years) Florida 212 Ohio 4-00 (2 years) Georgia 8o (2 years) Oklahoma 100 (2 years) Illinois 8oo ( 4 years) Pennsylvanla 300 Indiena 150 South Carolina - Iowa 100 (2 years) South Dakota - KMSt\8 50 Tennessee 100 Maryland 4o Texas - Michigan 200 Utah 20 Minnesota 368 (by 1973) Vermont 42 (2 years) Missouri 250 Washington - Nebraska 50 West Virginia - Nevada - Wisconsin - New Mexico 10 Wyoming - Source: Daily legislative bulletins published by the National. -
WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE Survey Comments
PE 08-14-438 LEGISLATIVE PERFORMANCE REVIEW WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE Survey Comments WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & RESEARCH DIVISION JOINT COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS Senate House of Delegates Agency/ Citizen Members Edwin J. Bowman, Chair Jim Morgan, Chair Dwight Calhoun Billy Wayne Bailey, Vice-Chair Dale Martin, Vice-Chair John A. Canfield Walt Helmick Sam Argento W. Joseph McCoy Donna Boley Ruth Rowan Kenneth Queen Clark S. Barnes Patti Schoen James Willison Craig Blair, Nonvoting Member Scott G. Varner, Nonvoting Member JOINT COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION Senate House of Delegates Edwin J. Bowman, Chair Jim Morgan, Chair Daniel Poling Billy Wayne Bailey, Jr., Vice-Chair Dale Martin, Vice-Chair Margaret A. Staggers Dan Foster Sam J. Argento Randy Swartzmiller Evan H. Jenkins Robert D. Beach Joe Talbott Jeffrey V. Kessler Samuel J. Cann, Sr. Troy Andes Brooks McCabe Mike Caputo Ray Canterbury, Minority Vice-Chair Joseph M. Minard Joe Delong Daryl E. Cowles Robert H. Plymale Jeff Eldridge Carol Miller Ron Stollings William G. Hartman Thomas Porter Randy White Barbara Hatfield Ruth Rowan Clark S. Barnes Dave Higgins Patti E. Schoen, Minority Chair Donna J. Boley Tal Hutchins Dave Sypolt Harold Michael John Yoder Corey L. Palumbo WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & RESEARCH DIVISION Building 1, Room W-314 Aaron Allred John Sylvia State Capitol Complex Legislative Auditor Director Charleston, West Virginia 25305 (304) 347-4890 Michael Midkiff Michael Castle Beverly Gandee Annamarie Short Research Manager Research Analyst Research Analyst Research Analyst Comment Number Responses for Question Four Under the present WVSP Administration what do you consider to be the overall goal or mission to be? 1 This, changes on a month to month basis. -
CAR SEAT SAFETY Safety Tips and Requirements
CAR SEAT SAFETY Safety tips and requirements. Motor vehicle injuries are a leading cause of death among children in the United States. But many of these deaths can be prevented by properly using child car seats. Every parent and caregiver is responsible to ensure that all children under their care are as safe as can possibly be at all times. While riding in a motor vehicle, the only way to do this is to ensure the child is properly restrained. Children under 12 years old don’t belong in the front seat! Statistics Car seat safety tips • Car seat use reduces the risk for death to infants • Always follow your car seat’s height and weight (aged <1 year) by 71%; and to toddlers (aged 1–4 limits. years) by 54% in passenger vehicles. • Make sure your car seat can be correctly installed in • Booster seat use reduces the risk for serious your vehicle. injury by 45% for children aged 4–8 years when • Keep the retainer clip (chest clip) fastened at armpit compared with seat belt use alone. level - not over their belly. • For older children and adults, seat belt use reduces the risk for death and serious injury by approximately half. The timeline of car seat requirements • Children under 2 years old should always be in a rear-facing seat. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children who are over 2 years old or who have outgrown their rear-facing car seats use a forward-facing seat with a harness until they reach the highest weight allowed by the forward-facing seat’s manufacturer. -
Respondent's Brief, West Virginia State Police, Et Al. V. Victoria Hughes, Et
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table ofAuthorities ......................................................... .iv . Statement of the Case .........................................................1 I. Factual Background A. Events Related to Wrongful Death Claim B. Events Related to Mishandling Bodily Remains Claim II. Admissions by State Police A. Corporal J.B. Flanigan B. Trooper lA. Ware C. Trooper M.D. Gillmore D. Barbara K. Boward E. Corporal lD. See F. Corporal Z.L. Nine Summary of Argument ........................................................9 Statement Regarding Oral Argument and Decision. 10 Argument ..................................................................10 I. Standard of Review. .. ........................... 10 II. Petitioners Breached a Duty to Respondents Arising Under the Special Relationship Exception to the Public Duty Doctrine ...............11 III. Petitioners Breached a Duty to Respondents in the Handling of Walter Hughes' Bodily Remains ...........................................13 IV. Qualified Immunity is Not Available for Non-Discretionary Acts .... 15 A. Qualified Immunity Has No Application to Respondents' Wrongful Death Claim ................................ 16 11 B. Qualified Immunity Has No Application to Petitioners' Claim ofMishandling the Remains ofWalter Hughes ............. .17 Conclusion .................................................................18 Certificate ofService .........................................................19 111 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Page Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co. v. -
Poster Contest Application
Poster Contest Application Thank you for participating in the 38th Contest! Please be sure to complete this application and ask your parent/guardian to complete the consent and release form before submitting your poster to your State Contest Manager. Posters that are submitted without an application and consent and release form included will not be considered for the contest. Name: ______________________________ Age: _______________________________ School: _____________________________ School Phone: ________________________ School Address: ______________________ City: _______________________________ State: ______________________________ Zip Code: ____________________________ : ______________________ : ______________________ Salutation (circle one): Mr. / Mrs. / Ms. : _______________________ 37th Day Poster Contest Winner : _______________________ Elliana C. | Oregon Salutation (circle one): Mr. / Mrs. / Ms. National Criminal Justice Training Center 6 Please tell us about your poster and why you created it: (100 words or less) ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ -
Virginia Lottery Principal/Key Manager Permit Application
Virginia Lottery Principal/Key Manager Permit Application Virginia Lottery 600 East Main Street, Richmond VA 23219 SUPPLIER PERMIT PRINCIPAL/KEY MANAGER APPLICATION Applicant: First, Middle, Last Name Affiliation: 1 Virginia Lottery Principal/Key Manager Permit Application DEFINITIONS An applicant for a Principal/Key Manager Supplier Permit in the Commonwealth of Virginia must file this form electronically through the Department’s online application portal. This document is to be used for reference purposes only. 11VAC5-90-10 defines a Principal as: An individual who, solely or together with the individual’s immediate family members, (i) owns or controls, directly or indirectly, five percent or more of the pecuniary interest in any entity that is a licensee, or (ii) has the power to vote or cause the vote of 5 percent or more of the voting securities or other ownership interests of such entity, and any person who manages a gaming operation on behalf of a licensee. 11 VAC5-90-10 defines Key Manager as: (a) An individual who owns, controls, or manages a licensee or otherwise exercises control over the gaming functions of a licensee; (b) An employee of a permit holder who manages, operates the facility, supervises the security of the facility, or is otherwise considered by the Department to be a Key Manager and, (c) Is not a gaming employee. This application begins the process by which a person may be licensed by the Department as a Principal/Key Manager. 2 Virginia Lottery Principal/Key Manager Permit Application DURATION, FEES AND COSTS Initial: Initial Non-Refundable Application fee $ 5,000.00 Non-refundable Background Investigation Deposit $50,000.00 Fingerprint Fees $ 35.72 * Total $55,035.72 Yearly Fee: $5,000.00 a year for the first four years. -
Audit of the West Virginia State Police Department's Equitable Sharing
REDACTED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Audit of the West Virginia State Police Department’s Equitable Sharing Program Activities, South Charleston, West Virginia AUDIT DIVISION 21-023 JANUARY 2021 REDACTED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The names of commercial products were redacted from Appendix 4 of this report because they did not have relevance for the context of the audit findings. REDACTED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Executive Summary Audit of the West Virginia State Police Department’s Equitable Sharing Program Activities, South Charleston, West Virginia Objectives Audit Results The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector Equitable sharing revenues represent a share of the proceeds General (OIG) has completed an audit to assess whether the from the forfeiture of assets seized in the course of certain West Virginia State Police (WVSP) accounted for DOJ equitable criminal investigations. This audit covered WVSP equitable sharing funds properly and used such assets for allowable sharing activities for its FYs 2017 through 2019, during which purposes as defined by applicable guidelines. the WVSP received $3,450,197 and reported spending $1,155,615 in equitable sharing revenues. We identified the Results in Brief following areas in which the WVSP can improve its We did not identify significant concerns regarding the administration and oversight of equitable sharing funds. timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of WVSP’s equitable Conducted Energy Weapons (Tasers) - We found that WVSP’s sharing reports in comparison to the eShare reports for fiscal physical records and the vendor-developed and maintained year (FY) 2017 through FY 2019. However, the WVSP did not electronic inventory system did not accurately account for ultimately use equitable sharing funds for only allowable 600 tasers purchased with equitable sharing funds. -
Indiana State Police Alliance Celebrating 45 Years
Challenges and Triumphs of Indiana State Police EOD Commission the Growing DNA Database Participate in Raven’s History Project Challenge INSIDE FALL 2019 VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OFOF THETHE INDIANAINDIANA STATE STATE POLICE POLICE ALLIANCE, ALLIANCE, INC. INC. VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 • FALL 2019 est. INDIANA STATE POLICE ALLIANCE CELEBRATING 45 YEARS LETTERS FROM THE PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FALL 2019 CONTENTS VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 FEATURES ISP Commission History 12 An Obsession to Document the History of Our ISP Commissions. By Mike Carrick Indiana State Police EOD Participates 8 in Raven’s Challenge Held at Muscatatuck Urban Training Center in 2017, 2018 and 2019 By Kent Havens 16 DNA Data Base Challenges and Triumphs of the Growing DNA Database By Kristine Crouch CODIS State Administrator 2006 – present 2 Indiana State Police Alliance OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE INDIANA STATE POLICE ALLIANCE, INC. VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 • FALL 2019 DEPARTMENTS ISPA BOARD Scott Krueger.......................President Shaun Armes .........................Area II President’s Letter . 7 Pete Wood .................Vice President Ross Johnson ........................Area III Chris Hill ............................. Area IV Celebrating the Future Mike Wood ...........Secretary/Area VI Will Etter ................Treasurer/Area V Will Etter ...............................Area V as we Look to the past Mike Jones ..............................Area I Mike Wood ..........................Area VI DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES Executive Director . 5 Lowell