DOCSLIB.ORG

Clallam County Community Wildfire Protection Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clallam County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Clallam County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Clallam County Community Wildfire Protection Plan December 2009 Developed by Shea McDonald and Dwight Barry, Peninsula College Center of Excellence. Contributions and developmental assistance: Chris DeSisto, Tiffany Nabors, Erin Drake, and Aaron Lambert; Western Washington University-Peninsulas; Bill Sanders and Bryan Suslick, Washington Department of Natural Resources; Al Knobbs, Clallam County Fire District 3; Jon Bugher, Clallam County Fire District 2; Phil Arbeiter, Clallam County Fire District 1; Larry Nickey, Olympic National Park; Clea Rome, USDA-NRCS; and Dean Millett, US Forest Service. GIS analysis by Shea McDonald, Chris DeSisto, and Dwight Barry. Cartography by Shea McDonald. Project funded under Title III of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000. 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 6 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Policy Context ............................................................................................................................. 7 Healthy Forests Restoration Act ........................................................................................................... 7 National Fire Plan .................................................................................................................................. 8 Federal Emergency Management Agency Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan ............................................ 9 The Community Wildfire Protection Plan Handbook ........................................................................... 9 National Fire Protection Association and the International Code Council ........................................... 9 II. Planning Process ....................................................................................................................... 10 Community Involvement .......................................................................................................... 10 Plan Adoption............................................................................................................................ 10 Planning Area ............................................................................................................................ 10 III. Clallam County Description ...................................................................................................... 11 Location and Background ......................................................................................................... 11 Communities ............................................................................................................................. 12 Demographics ........................................................................................................................... 12 Places of Value .......................................................................................................................... 14 Environment.............................................................................................................................. 15 Weather .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................................ 18 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Wildlife ................................................................................................................................................ 21 Land Use .............................................................................................................................................. 21 Transportation .......................................................................................................................... 21 Fire Protection .......................................................................................................................... 22 IV. Wildfire Hazard and Risk Assessment...................................................................................... 23 Fire History ................................................................................................................................ 23 Fire History of the Olympic Peninsula and Clallam County ................................................................ 23 Statewide Trends and Patterns ........................................................................................................... 24 2 Historic Fire Regime .................................................................................................................. 25 Fire Regime Condition Class ...................................................................................................... 27 Wildland-Urban Interface ......................................................................................................... 27 Wildfire Conditions ................................................................................................................... 29 Types of Wildfires ..................................................................................................................... 30 Hazard Assessment ................................................................................................................... 30 Fuels .................................................................................................................................................... 32 Slope .................................................................................................................................................... 33 Aspect.................................................................................................................................................. 34 Fire Response Time Network .............................................................................................................. 35 Viewshed ............................................................................................................................................. 36 Climate ................................................................................................................................................ 37 Combined Climate and Spatial Hazard................................................................................................ 38 Modeling Fire Behavior ............................................................................................................. 39 “Watch-Out” Weather Conditions ...................................................................................................... 39 Areas of Increased Danger to Firefighters .......................................................................................... 39 V. WUI “At-Risk” Communities ..................................................................................................... 41 Determining or Designating a Community as “At-Risk” ........................................................... 41 Criteria for Prioritizing Mitigation Activities ............................................................................. 41 Identification of At-Risk Communities in Clallam County ......................................................... 41 Fire District #1 ..................................................................................................................................... 42 Fire District #2 and Port Angeles Fire Department ............................................................................. 47 Fire District #3 (Including Sequim) ...................................................................................................... 50 Fire District #4 ..................................................................................................................................... 52 Fire District #5 ..................................................................................................................................... 53 Fire District #6 – Quillayute Area ........................................................................................................ 55 Unprotected Areas .............................................................................................................................. 56 Tribal Areas ......................................................................................................................................... 59 VI. Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................................... 61 Hazardous Fuel Reduction ........................................................................................................ 61 Reduction of Structural Ignitability ........................................................................................... 62 Firewise Construction ............................................................................................................... 62 Firewise Landscaping ................................................................................................................ 63 The Firewise
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Executive Summary……………………………………………………...… 1
    2009 Olympic Knotweed Working Group Knotweed in Sekiu, 2009 prepared by Clallam County Noxious Weed Control Board For more information contact: Clallam County Noxious Weed Control Board 223 East 4th Street Ste 15 Port Angeles WA 98362 360-417-2442 or [email protected] or http://clallam.wsu.edu/weeds.html CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………...… 1 OVERVIEW MAPS……………………………………………………………… 2 & 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 Project Goal……………………………………………………………………… 4 Project Overview………………………………………………………………… 4 2009 Overview…………………………………………………………………… 4 2009 Summary…………………………………………………………………... 5 2009 Project Procedures……………………………………………………….. 6 Outreach………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Funding……………………………………………………………………………. 8 Staff Hours………………………………………………………………………... 8 Participating Groups……………………………………………………………... 9 Observations and Conclusions…………………………………………………. 10 Recommendations……………………………………………………………..... 10 PROJECT ACTIVITIES BY WATERSHED Quillayute River System ………………………………………………………... 12 Big River and Hoko-Ozette Road………………………………………………. 15 Sekiu River………………………………………………………........................ 18 Hoko River………………………………………………………......................... 20 Sekiu, Clallam Bay and Highway 112…………………………………………. 22 Clallam River………………………………………………………..................... 24 Pysht River………………………………………………………........................ 26 Sol Duc River and tributaries…………………………………………………… 28 Forks………………………………………………………………………………. 34 Valley Creek……………………………………………………………………… 36 Peabody Creek…………………………………………………………………… 37 Ennis Creek……………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places
    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-741 UNITtDSTATtSDhPARTMENTOHTHt INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLAGES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS __________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ I NAME HISTORIC LIGHT STATION AND/OR COMMON Q LOCATION STREET & NUMBER U> f\ T 3 3* _NOTFOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT MLJKTLTEO — VICINITY OF 2nd STATE v. CODE COUNTY CODE W2\SHTJ^5TON 53 SNOHOMISH 061 CLASSIFI CATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT X-PUBLIC —iSXXUPIED _AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM jegUILDING(S) _PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _IN PROCESS XXTES: RESTRICTED X.GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL XXTRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: AGENCY U.S. COAST GUARD REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: THIRTEENTH COAST GUARD DISTRICT (flp) STREET & NUMBER 915 Second Avenue CITY. TOWN STATE Seattle VICINITY OF Washington 98174 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC Snohomish County Recorder STREET & NUMBER Courthouse CITY, TOWN STATE Washington REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE NOME KNOWN DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY __LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED jg<LINALTERED JOjORIGINAL SITE X-GOOD _RUINS —ALTERED —MOVED DATE_______ —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The structure consists of a tower and connected engine house, both of which are frame construction. The tower base is square, twenty feet on a side, and rises one story to a decorative parallel band. Above this band, triangular squinches effect a transition to an octagonal plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Implementation Purpose and Need: The Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries are severely degraded as a result of two hydroelectric dams (projects) and their reservoirs built in the early 1900s. Congress has mandated the full restoration of this ecosystem and its native anadromous fisheries through the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act (Public Law 102-495). The Department of the Interior has found there is a need to return this river and the ecosystem to its natural, self-regulating state, and proposes to implement the Congressional mandate by removing both dams in a safe, environmentally sound and cost effective manner and implementing fisheries and ecosystem restoration planning. Only dam removal would fully restore the ecosystem or its native anadromous fisheries. Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of the Interior proposes to fully restore the Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries through the removal of Elwha Dam and Glines Canyon Dam and implementing fish restoration and revegetation. Dam removal would occur over a 2-year period. Elwha Dam would be removed by blasting, and Glines Canyon Dam by a combination of blasting and diamond wire saw cutting. Lake Aldwell would be drained by a diversion channel, and Lake Mills by notching down Glines Canyon Dam. Stored sediment would be eroded naturally by the Elwha River. The proposed action is located in Clallam County, on the Olympic Peninsula, in Washington State. Lead/Cooperating agencies: The National Park Service is the lead agency. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bugler Making Connections
    Olympic National Park National Park Service Park Newspaper U.S. Department of the Interior Summer 2002 EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICA Bugler Making Connections... ow does one of the most intriguing stories of old-growth forest connections A couple stands enraptured, gazing from Hurricane Ridge at the Hunite flying squirrels, spotted owls and truffles? Flying squirrels, usually magnificence of wilderness. On this wintry morning, caps of ice cover arboreal and hidden from predators, glide down to the forest floor to dig for the mountaintops, caps of wool cover their heads. Half a century ago, fragrant truffles. The spores from these underground fungi mix with nitrogen- when they honeymooned here, their eyes met the same views. fixing bacteria and yeasts in the squirrel's stomach, creating crucial nutritious They revisit their youth and renew their bonds, with each other and pellets for trees and spreading the spores of the fungi. with the land. Continuity and connections. Furthermore, the tiny roots of these truffles interconnect huge old-growth roots. They revisit their youth and renew their bonds, In a mutually beneficial relationship, the fungi stimulate tree root growth and the with each other and with the land. trees feed sugars and amino acids to the fungi. Through this underground network, the trees exchange nutrients among themselves, which essentially Just for a moment, during your trip to Olympic National Park, while creates one grand old-growth tree. standing beneath the glory of the mountains or amid the grandeur of evergreens, stop. Think of an intriguing natural or cultural feature that With the attention of the flying squirrel still focused on truffles, the keen-eyed you encountered during your visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft CCP, Chapters 3-6, November 2012 (Pdf 3.0
    Physical Environment Chapter 3 © Mary Marsh Chapter 6 Chapter 5 Chapter 4 Chapter 3 Chapter 2 Chapter 1 Environmental Human Biological Physical Alternatives, Goals, Introduction and Appendices Consequences Environment Environment Environment Objectives, and Strategies Background Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge Draft CCP/EA Chapter 3. Physical Environment 3.1 Climate and Climate Change 3.1.1 General Climate Conditions The climate at Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) is a mild, mid-latitude, west coast marine type. Because of the moderating influence of the Pacific Ocean, extremely high or low temperatures are rare. Summers are generally cool and dry while winters are mild but moist and cloudy with most of the precipitation falling between November and January (USDA 1987, WRCC 2011a). Annual precipitation in the region is low due to the rain shadow cast by the Olympic Mountains and the extension of the Coastal Range on Vancouver Island (Figure 3-1). Snowfall is rare or light. During the latter half of the summer and in the early fall, fog banks from over the ocean and the Strait of Juan de Fuca cause considerable fog and morning cloudiness (WRCC 2011a). Climate Change Trends The greenhouse effect is a natural phenomenon that assists in regulating and warming the temperature of our planet. Just as a glass ceiling traps heat inside a greenhouse, certain gases in the atmosphere, called greenhouse gases (GHG), absorb and emit infrared radiation from sunlight. The primary greenhouse gases occurring in the atmosphere include carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, methane, and nitrous oxide. CO2 is produced in the largest quantities, accounting for more than half of the current impact on the Earth’s climate.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places 2007 Weekly Lists
    National Register of Historic Places 2007 Weekly Lists January 5, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................. 3 January 12, 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 8 January 19, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 14 January 26, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 20 February 2, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 27 February 9, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 40 February 16, 2007 ....................................................................................................................................... 47 February 23, 2007 ....................................................................................................................................... 55 March 2, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................. 62 March 9, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies of Three Salmon and Steelhead Stocks in Oregon and Washington, Including Population Status, Threats, and Monitoring Recommendations
    HOW HEALTHY ARE HEALTHY STOCKS? Case Studies of Three Salmon and Steelhead Stocks in Oregon and Washington, including Population Status, Threats, and Monitoring Recommendations Prepared for the Native Fish Society April 2001 How Healthy Are Healthy Stocks? Case Studies of Three Salmon and Steelhead Stocks in Oregon and Washington, including Population Status, Threats, and Monitoring Recommendations Prepared for: Bill Bakke, Director Native Fish Society P.O. Box 19570 Portland, Oregon 97280 Prepared by: Peter Bahls, Senior Fish Biologist David Evans and Associates, Inc. 2828 S.W. Corbett Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 Sponsored by the Native Fish Society and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. April 2001 Please cite this document as follows: Bahls, P. 2001. How healthy are healthy stocks? Case studies of three salmon and steelhead stocks in Oregon and Washington, including population status, threats, and monitoring recommendations. David Evans and Associates, Inc. Report. Portland, Oregon, USA. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Three salmon stocks were chosen for case studies in Oregon and Washington that were previously identified as “healthy” in a coast-wide assessment of stock status (Huntington et al. 1996): fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) of the Wilson River, summer steelhead (O. mykiss) of the Middle Fork John Day (MFJD) River, and winter steelhead (O. mykiss) of the Sol Duc River. The purpose of the study was to examine with a finer focus the status of these three stocks and the array of human influences that affect them. The best available information was used, some of which has become available since the 1996 assessment of healthy stocks was conducted. Recommendations for monitoring were developed to address priority data gaps and most pressing threats to the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Human Environment Appendices
    Human Environment Chapter 5 © Dow Lambert Chapter 5 Chapter 4 Chapter 3 Chapter 2 Chapter 1 Human Biological Physical Management Introduction and Appendices Environment Environment Environment Direction Background Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Chapter 5. Human Environment 5.1 Cultural Resources 5.1.1 Native American Overview Prehistory Jeanne M. Welch and R.D. Daugherty prepared a compilation of the prehistoric era on the Olympic Peninsula as part of their background information for a 1988 survey project on Dungeness NWR (Welch and Daugherty 1988). The following information is paraphrased from their report. The five periods of occupation for the region proposed by Eric Bergland (Bergland 1984) cover approximately 12,000 years and include: Early Prehistoric, Middle Prehistoric Early Maritime, Prehistoric, Northwest Coast Pattern, and Historic. On the Olympic Peninsula, the prehistoric people are characterized as small groups of hunters and gatherers who moved around to utilize both terrestrial and maritime resources. This period on the peninsula is represented by the Manis Mastodon site (45CA218) which attests to the hunting of large game animals. It is likely that the onset of the Middle Prehistoric saw an increase in the use of maritime resources such as anadromous fish. By the Early Maritime period, proposed to have begun around 3,000 years before present (BP), the use of maritime resources was well established. It is likely that the cultural manifestations of these later prehistoric periods resembled those of the ethnographic period, but details such as the existence of villages with large, cedar plankhouses are uncertain. During the Prehistoric Northwest Coast Pattern period, which began 1,000 years BP, chipped stone assemblages virtually disappeared while large plankhouse villages became prominent.
    [Show full text]
  • Bugler 2010 Designer and Editor Glines Canyon Dam (Left)
    8 Summer 2010 Olympic National Park BUGLER Summer Newspaper 2010 OlComeOlOlympic’ympic’ympic’ Explores WWs ilderilderildernessnessness Wilderness is... a place for people seeking solitude, escape, wildness, beauty and much more. A place for clean water, clean air, abundant wildlife, and diverse and unique plants. A place for the solo adventurer, families, mountaineers and for friends. A place for the young and the old. Wilderness Take A is a place for all people. For the past 25 years I have camped and hiked all over the west and Olympic National Park is still one of my favorite places. In this spectacular park my family and I can enjoy the comfort of a campground, take a short day hike or Last Look embark on a backpacking trip. I am always amazed that at Olympic I can stand on a sandy beach with waves By BARB MAYNES, Public Information Officer lapping at my feet and gaze out past mammoth sea stacks at the Pacific fter years of planning and preparation, Olympic Ocean, and the next day I can become immersed in the refreshing embrace National Park is gearing up for the largest dam of the temperate rain forest. Or I can walk through groves of giant trees removal in U.S. history and celebrating the ‘last while following the path of a crystal clear river up to its source in the lofty, A snow covered mountain passes and peaks that overlook the valley below. dam summer’ in the Elwha River Valley. Next summer, removal of Elwha and Glines Canyon dams on the My spine has tingled as a giant bull elk and I have watched a mountain lion Elwha River will begin, the culminating step in a run along a huge log in the rain forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Catch Record Cards & Codes
    Catch Record Cards Catch Record Card Codes The Catch Record Card is an important management tool for estimating the recreational catch of PUGET SOUND REGION sturgeon, steelhead, salmon, halibut, and Puget Sound Dungeness crab. A catch record card must be REMINDER! 824 Baker River 724 Dakota Creek (Whatcom Co.) 770 McAllister Creek (Thurston Co.) 814 Salt Creek (Clallam Co.) 874 Stillaguamish River, South Fork in your possession to fish for these species. Washington Administrative Code (WAC 220-56-175, WAC 825 Baker Lake 726 Deep Creek (Clallam Co.) 778 Minter Creek (Pierce/Kitsap Co.) 816 Samish River 832 Suiattle River 220-69-236) requires all kept sturgeon, steelhead, salmon, halibut, and Puget Sound Dungeness Return your Catch Record Cards 784 Berry Creek 728 Deschutes River 782 Morse Creek (Clallam Co.) 828 Sauk River 854 Sultan River crab to be recorded on your Catch Record Card, and requires all anglers to return their fish Catch by the date printed on the card 812 Big Quilcene River 732 Dewatto River 786 Nisqually River 818 Sekiu River 878 Tahuya River Record Card by April 30, or for Dungeness crab by the date indicated on the card, even if nothing “With or Without Catch” 748 Big Soos Creek 734 Dosewallips River 794 Nooksack River (below North Fork) 830 Skagit River 856 Tokul Creek is caught or you did not fish. Please use the instruction sheet issued with your card. Please return 708 Burley Creek (Kitsap Co.) 736 Duckabush River 790 Nooksack River, North Fork 834 Skokomish River (Mason Co.) 858 Tolt River Catch Record Cards to: WDFW CRC Unit, PO Box 43142, Olympia WA 98504-3142.
    [Show full text]
  • CPB7 C12 WEB.Pdf
    488 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 12 Chapter 7, Pilot Coast U.S. 124° 123° Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 7—Chapter 12 18421 BOUNDARY NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage BAY CANADA 49° http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml UNITED STATES S T R Blaine 125° A I T O F G E O R V ANCOUVER ISLAND G (CANADA) I A 18431 18432 18424 Bellingham A S S Y P B 18460 A R 18430 E N D L U L O I B N G Orcas Island H A M B A Y H A R O San Juan Island S T 48°30' R A S I Lopez Island Anacortes T 18465 T R A I Victoria T O F 18433 18484 J 18434 U A N D E F U C Neah Bay A 18427 18429 SKAGIT BAY 18471 A D M I R A L DUNGENESS BAY T 18485 18468 Y I N Port Townsend L E T Port Angeles W ASHINGTON 48° 31 MAY 2020 31 MAY 31 MAY 2020 U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 12 ¢ 489 Strait of Juan De Fuca and Georgia, Washington (1) thick weather, because of strong and irregular currents, ENC - extreme caution and vigilance must be exercised. Chart - 18400 Navigators not familiar with these waters should take a pilot. (2) This chapter includes the Strait of Juan de Fuca, (7) Sequim Bay, Port Discovery, the San Juan Islands and COLREGS Demarcation Lines its various passages and straits, Deception Pass, Fidalgo (8) The International Regulations for Preventing Island, Skagit and Similk Bays, Swinomish Channel, Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS) apply on all the Fidalgo, Padilla, and Bellingham Bays, Lummi Bay, waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Haro Strait, and Strait Semiahmoo Bay and Drayton Harbor and the Strait of of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Elwha River Watershed, Located on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State, As a Component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (National System)
    National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Elwha Wild & Scenic River Eligibility Report Final Draft July 2004 Executive Summary Purpose and Background of this Study This draft study report evaluates the eligibility and classification of the Elwha River watershed, located on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State, as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (National System). This assessment makes no recommendation as to whether or not the river should be placed in the National System. It only addresses its eligibility and classification. If a river segment is found to be eligible, policy requires that federal land management agencies do everything possible to ensure that the resource values, which are the basis of the eligibility, are protected. An eligibility study is the first step in a process that could result in a river eventually being designated into the National System. If a river is found eligible, typically the next step is to conduct a suitability study. A suitability study assesses whether or not eligible segments should be included in the National System. It is based on public input and an assessment of the ability of the river segment(s) to be managed to protect the river values. In most cases management alternatives are also developed in conjunction with or after a suitability analysis. If eligibility and suitability studies contain favorable recommendations, designation of the river into the National System can happen through two ways: (1) By Act of Congress and (2) By the Secretary of the Interior through a recommendation from a State’s Governor (Section 2(a)(ii)).
    [Show full text]