DOCSLIB.ORG

MAGNETIC STRATIGRAPHY This Is Volume 64 in the INTERNATIONAL GEOPHYSICS SERIES a Series of Monographs and Textbooks Edited by RENATA DMOWSKA and JAMES R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MAGNETIC STRATIGRAPHY This is Volume 64 in the INTERNATIONAL GEOPHYSICS SERIES A series of monographs and textbooks Edited by RENATA DMOWSKA and JAMES R. HOLTON A complete list of books in this series appears at the end of this volume. MAGNETIC STRATIGRAPHY NElL D. OPDYKE AND JAMES E. T. CHANNELL Department of Geology University of Florida Gainesville, Florida ACADEMIC PRESS San Diego London Boston New York Sydney Tokyo Toronto This book is printed on acid-free paper. (~ Copyright 9 1996 by ACADEMIC PRESS All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Academic Press, Inc. 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101-4495, USA http ://w w w. apne t. com Academic Press Limited 24-28 Oval Road, London NWI 7DX, UK http://www.hbuk.co.uk/ap/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Opdyke, N. D. Magnetic stratigraphy / by N.D. Opdyke, J.E.T. Channell. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-12-527470-X (alk. paper) 1. Paleomagnetism. 2. Stratigraphic correlation. I. Channell, J. E.T. II. Title. QE501.4.P35063 1996 551.7'01--dc20 96-5925 CIP PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 96 97 98 99 00 01 BC 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 In memory of S. K. Runcorn 1922-1995 a This Page Intentionally Left Blank Contents Preface xi Table Key xiii 1 Introduction and History 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Early Developments 1.3 Evidence for Field Reversal 2 The Earth's Magnetic Field 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 The Dipole Hypothesis 15 2.3 Models of Field Reversal 17 2.4 Polarity Transition Records and VGP PalEs 20 2.5 Statistical Structure of the Geomagnetic Polarity Pattern 24 o, VII eeo VIII Contents 3 Magnetization Processes and Magnetic Properties of Sediments 3.1 Basic Principle 26 3.2 Magnetic Minerals 29 3.3 Magnetization Processes 34 3.4 Magnetic Properties of Marine Sediments 37 3.5 Magnetic Properties of Terrestrial Sediments 45 4 Laboratory Techniques 4.1 Introduction 49 4.2 Resolving Magnetization Components 50 4.3 Statistics 58 4.4 Practical Guide to the Identification of Magnetic Minerals 61 5 Fundamentals of Magnetic Stratigraphy 5.1 Principles and Definitions 74 5.2 Polarity Zone and Polarity Chron Nomenclature 75 5.3 Field Tests for Timing of Remanence Acquisition 82 5.4 Field Sampling for Magnetic Polarity Stratigraphy 85 5.5 Presentation of Magnetostratigraphic Data 91 5.6 Correlation of Polarity Zones to the GPTS 91 5.7 Quality Criteria for Magnetos~atigraphic Data 93 6 The Pliocene-Pleistocene Polarity Record 6.1 Early Development of the Plio-Pleistocene OPTS 95 6.2 Subchrons within the Maluyama Chron 96 6.3 Magnetic Stratigraphy in Plio-Pleistocene Sediments 99 6.4 Astrochronologic Calibration of the Plio-Pleistocene GPTS 107 6.5 4~ Age Calibration of the Plio-Pleistocene GPTS 111 Contents ix 7 Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic GPTS 7.1 Oceanic Magnetic Anomaly Record 113 7.2 Numerical Age Control 119 8 Paleogene and Miocene Marine Magnetic Stratigraphy 8.1 Miocene Magnetic Stratigraphy 126 8.2 Paleogene Magnetic Stratigraphy 132 8.3 Integration of Chemostratigraphy and Magnetic Stratigraphy 136 9 Cenozoic Terrestrial Magnetic Stratigraphy 9.1 Introduction 144 9.2 North American Neogene and Quaternary 145 9.3 Eurasian Neogene 146 9.4 African and South American Neogene 155 9.5 North American and Eurasian Paleogene 156 9.6 Mammal Dispersal in the Northern Hemisphere 160 10 Jurassic-Early Cretaceous GPTS 10.1 Oceanic Magnetic Anomaly Record 168 10.2 Numerical Age Control 171 10.3 Oxfordian-Aptian Time Scales 175 10.4 Hettangian-Oxfordian Time Scales 176 11 Jurassic and Cretaceous Magnetic Stratigraphy 11.1 Cretaceous Magnetic Stratigraphy 182 11.2 Jurassic Magnetic Stratigraphy 196 11.3 Correlation of Late Jurassic-Cretaceous Stage Boundaries to the GPTS 202 x Contents 12 Triassic and Paleozoic Magnetic Stratigraphy 12.1 Introduction 205 12.2 Triassic 207 12.3 Permian 215 12.4 Carboniferous 220 12.5 Pre-Carboniferous 222 12.6 Polarity Bias in the Phanerozoic 229 13 Secular Variation and Brunhes Chron Excursions 13.1 Introduction 233 13.2 Sediment Records of Secular Variation 234 13.3 Geomagnetic Excursions in the Brunhes Chron 242 14 Rock Magnetic Stratigraphy and Paleointensities 14.1 Introduction 250 14.2 Magnetic Parameters Sensitive to Concentration, Grain Size, and Mineralogy 251 14.3 Rock Magnetic Stratigraphy in Marine Sediments 253 14.4 Rock Magnetic Stratigraphy in Loess Deposits 265 14.5 Rock Magnetic Stratigraphy in Lake Sediments 266 14.6 Future Prospects for Rock Magnetic Stratigraphy 269 14.7 Paleointensity Determinations 270 Bibliography 277 Index 333 Preface Magnetic polarity stratigraphy, the stratigraphic record of polarity reversals in rocks and sediments, is now thoroughly integrated into biostratigraphy and chemostratigraphy. For Late Mesozoic to Quaternary times, the geo- magnetic polarity record is central to the construction of geologic time scales, linking biostratigraphies, isotope stratigraphies, and absolute ages. The application of magnetic stratigraphy in geologic investigations is now commonplace; however, the use of magnetic stratigraphy as a correla- tion tool in sediments and lava flows has developed only in the past 35 years. As recently as the mid-1960s, magnetic polarity stratigraphy dealt with only the last 3 My of Earth history; today, a fairly well-resolved magnetic polarity sequence has been documented back to 300 My before present. An increasing number of scientists in allied fields now use and apply magnetic stratigraphy. This book is aimed at this expanding prac- titioner base, providing information about the principles of magnetostratig- raphy and the present state of our knowledge concerning correlations among the various (biostratigraphic, chemostratigraphic, magnetostrati- graphic, and numerical) facets of geologic time. Magnetic Stratigraphy documents the historical development of magne- tostratigraphy (Chapter 1), the principal characteristics of the Earth's mag- netic field (Chapter 2), the magnetization process and the magnetic proper- ties of sediments (Chapter 3), and practical laboratory techniques (Chapter 4). Chapter 5 describes the essential elements that should be incorporated into any magnetostratigraphic investigation. The middle of the book is devoted to a survey of the status of magnetic stratigraphy in Jurassic through Quaternary marine (Chapters 6-8, 10, and 11) and terrestrial (Chapter 9) sedimentary rocks and describes the integration of the biostratigraphic and chemostratigraphic record with the geomagnetic polarity time scale (GPTS). Recent developments in extending the magnetic polarity record to pre-Jurassic sediments and the emergence xi oo XII Preface of a magnetic polarity record for the Triassic, Permian, and Carboniferous periods are chronicled in Chapter 12. The record of secular variation of the geomagnetic field has been important in attempting correlations in sediments that span the last 10,000 years (Chapter 13). Magnetic stratigraphy is expanding further through the use of nondirectional magnetic properties of sediments, such as magnetic susceptibility and a host of other magnetic parameters sensitive to magnetic mineral concentration and grain size (Chapter 14). It is now becoming apparent that geomagnetic intensity variations, as recorded in sediments, may well be the next important magnetostratigraphic tool, promising to provide high-resolution global correlation within polarity chrons. The authors thank the following people, who made important sugges- tions for improving the manuscript: B. Clement, D. Hodell, K. Huang, E. Irving, D. V. Kent, E. Lindsay, B. MacFadden, M. McElhinny, S. K. Run- corn, and J. S. Stoner. Parts of this book were written while one of us (J.E.T.C.) was on sabbatical in Kyoto (Japan) and Gif-sur-Yvette (France). M. Torii, C. Laj, and C. Kissel made these sabbaticals possible. Finally, we express special appreciation to Marjorie Opdyke, who patiently and skill- fully produced the original figures for this book with loving attention to detail. The authors of Magnetic Stratigraphy received their doctoral training from the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, where Professor S. K. Run- corn inspired their life-long interest in paleomagnetism. We are saddened by his murder in December of 1995 and dedicate this volume to Dr. Runcorn as an expression of our gratitude to him as our friend and mentor. Neil D. Opdyke James E. T. Channell Table Key Throughout this book, compilations of important magnetostratigraphic studies are presented as black/white (normal/reverse) interpretive polarity columns. These are accompanied by tables that include the following infor- mation for each study. Rock unit A designation of the rock unit, usually as a formation name, locality, or core/hole/site number Age range Age range of the stratigraphic section(s) Region Country or region of study h Site latitude (positive :north, negative :south) Site longitude (positive : east, negative :west) NSE Number of sections NSI Number of sites or site interval (m). P (includes pass- through magnetometer measurements) NSA Number of samples per site M Section thickness (m) D Associated absolute age control: K (K-Ar), A (4~ 39Ar), F (fission track), R (Rb/Sr), S (strontium isoto- pic ratios), O (~180), As (astrochronology) RM Rock magnetic measurements/observations: K (suscepti- bility), J (Js/T), I (IRM), V (VRM), A (ARM), H (hysteresis measurements), TdI (thermal
Recommended publications

  • Blue River Valley Stratigraphic Chart

    Blue River Valley Hydrogeologic Geologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Unit Modern Alluvium and outwash deposits Alluvial Aquifer Quaternary Glacial deposits Glacial deposits Glaciation Older stream and outwash terrace Local perched deposits aquifer Troublesome Formation Local aquifer Neogene Extension Volcanic rocks Volcanics Paleogene Transition Paleogene and Cretaceous intrusive Crystalline rocks bedrock Laramide Pierre Shale Smoky Hill Member Fort Hayes Limestone Pierre confining Niobrara Niobrara Formation Cretaceous unit Interior Carlile Shale Seaway Greenhorn Limestone Graneros Shale Benton Group Dakota Sandstone Dakota Aquifer Morrison Formation Morrison Aquifer Jurassic Mesozoic Entrada Sandstone Entrada Aquifer Sandstones Chinle confining Triassic Chinle Formation unit Permian Maroon Formation Ancestral Maroon-Minturn Rocky Aquifer Mountains Minturn Formation Pennsylvanian Mississippian No strata Devonian Chaffee Group Paleozoic Silurian Mississippian- Carbonates Cambrian Ordovician Manitou Formation carbonate aquifer Dotsero Formation and Cambrian Sawatch Sandstone Crystalline rocks of igneous and Crystalline Precambrian Precambrian metamorphic origin in mountainous bedrock region Table 12a-05-01. Blue River Valley stratigraphic chart. Blue River Valley Unit Thickness Hydrogeologic Geologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Physical Characteristics Hydrologic Characteristics (ft) Unit Well to poorly-sorted, uncemented sands, silts and gravels along modern Modern Alluvium and outwash deposits >35 Alluvial Aquifer streams and
  • Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation, Colorado, U.S.A

    Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation, Colorado, U.S.A

    Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2008, v. 78, 0–0 Research Articles DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2008.052 DEPOSITS FROM WAVE-INFLUENCED TURBIDITY CURRENTS: PENNSYLVANIAN MINTURN FORMATION, COLORADO, U.S.A. 1 2 2 3 2 M. P. LAMB, P. M. MYROW, C. LUKENS, K. HOUCK, AND J. STRAUSS 1Department of Earth & Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. 2Department of Geology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, U.S.A. 3Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, 80217-3363 U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Turbidity currents generated nearshore have been suggested to be the source of some sandy marine event beds, but in most cases the evidence is circumstantial. Such flows must commonly travel through a field of oscillatory flow caused by wind-generated waves; little is known, however, about the interactions between waves and turbidity currents. We explore these interactions through detailed process-oriented sedimentological analysis of sandstone event beds from the Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation in north-central Colorado, U.S.A. The Minturn Formation exhibits a complex stratigraphic architecture of fan-delta deposits that developed in association with high topographic relief in a tectonically active setting. An , 20–35-m- thick, unconformity-bounded unit of prodelta deposits consists of dark green shale and turbidite-like sandstone beds with tool marks produced by abundant plant debris. Some of the sandstone event beds, most abundant at distal localities, contain reverse- to-normal grading and sequences of sedimentary structures that indicate deposition from waxing to waning flows. In contrast, proximal deposits, in some cases less than a kilometer away, contain abundant beds with evidence for deposition by wave- dominated combined flows, including large-scale hummocky cross-stratification (HCS).
  • Further Paleomagnetic Evidence for Oroclinal Rotation in the Central Folded Appalachians from the Bloomsburg and the Mauch Chunk Formations

    Further Paleomagnetic Evidence for Oroclinal Rotation in the Central Folded Appalachians from the Bloomsburg and the Mauch Chunk Formations

    TECTONICS, VOL. 7, NO. 4, PAGES 749-759, AUGUST 1988 FURTHER PALEOMAGNETIC EVIDENCE FOR OROCLINAL ROTATION IN THE CENTRAL FOLDED APPALACHIANS FROM THE BLOOMSBURG AND THE MAUCH CHUNK FORMATIONS Dennis V. Kent Lamont-DohertyGeological Observatory and Departmentof GeologicalSciences ColumbiaUniversity, Palisades, New York Abstract.Renewed paleomagnetic investigations of red fromthe Bloomsburg, Mauch Chunk, and revised results bedsof theUpper Silurian Bloomsburg and the Lower recentlyreported for theUpper Devonian Catskill Formation Carboniferous Mauch Chunk Formations were undertaken togetherindicate 22.8•>+_11.9 oof relativerotation, accounting with theobjective of obtainingevidence regarding the for approximatelyhalf thepresent change in structuraltrend possibilityof oroclinalbending as contributing to thearcuate aroundthe Pennsylvania salient. The oroclinalrotation can be structuraltrend of thePennsylvania salient. These formations regardedas a tightenS.*'.3 o/'a lessarcuate depositional package cropout on both limbs of thesalient and earlier, but less thatdeveloped across a basementreentrant, to achievea definitivepaleomagnetic studies on these units indicate that curvaturecloser to that of the earlierzigzag continental margin earlyacquired magnetizations can be recovered. Oriented outline. sampleswere obtained from nine sites on the southern limb of thesalient and eight sites from the northern limb in the INTRODUCTION Bloomsburg.The naturalremanent magnetizations are multivectorial,dominated by a component(B) with a A testof the oroclinehypothesis
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie

    Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie

    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
  • Paleomagnetism of the Upper Ordovician Juniata Formation of the Central Appalachians Revisited Again

    Paleomagnetism of the Upper Ordovician Juniata Formation of the Central Appalachians Revisited Again

    JOURNALOF GEOPHYSICALRESEARCH, VOL. 94, NO. B2, PAGES1843-1849, FEBRUARY10, 1989 PALEOMAGNETISM OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN JUNIATA FORMATION OF THE CENTRAL APPALACHIANS REVISITED AGAIN JohnD. Miller1 andDennis V. Kent Lamont-DohertyGeological Observatol 3, and Department of GeologicalSciences, ColumbiaUniversity, Palisades, New York Abstract.Two componentsof magnetizationwere isolated demagnetizationin thestudy of red beds.During this time in theUpper Ordovician Juniata Formation sampled in the area periodall of themajor Appalachian red beds were studied or of the Pennsylvaniasalient. The thermallydistributed, restudiedusing modem paleomagnetic techniques. The revised reversedpolarity B componentwas most likely acquired resultsfrom the Juniatawere reported by Van der Voo and duringAlleghenian deformation, and although it is poorly French[ 1977], andwere incorporatedinto the analysisof grouped,it is similarto otherAppalachian synfolding Schwartzand Van der Voo [ 1983], which concludedthat there magnetizations.The pre-Alleghenianage C magnetizationis was no oroclinal rotation involved in the formation of the entirelyof normalpolarity and showsa differencein Pennsylvaniasalient, a majorstructural feature of thecentral declinationsbetween the meanmagnetizations isolated on the Appalachians. northern and southern limbs of the salient of 24 ø _+23 ø. This Recentcontroversy regarding the Paleozoic reference poles anomalyis consistentwith the senseand magnitude of for North Americaand their tectonic implications [Kent and declinationanomalies observed
  • Inside: GSA Bookstore Update, a Special Insert, P

    Inside: GSA Bookstore Update, a Special Insert, P

    VOL. 14, NO. 6 A PUBLICATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA JUNE 2004 Title Sponsor of the 2004 GSA Annual Meeting. Inside: GSA Bookstore Update, A Special Insert, p. 33 Limnogeology Division Award, p. 59 GeoMart Geoscience Directory, p. 62 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 6 JUNE 2004 GSA TODAY publishes news and information for more than 18,000 GSA members and subscribing libraries. GSA Today Cover Images: Upper left: “The Big Blue lead science articles should present the results of exciting new research or summarize and synthesize important problems or Marble,” courtesy of NASA. Lower left: Larson issues, and they must be understandable to all in the earth B Ice Shelf collapse. Image courtesy of NASA/ science community. Submit manuscripts to science editors GSFC/LaRC/JPL, MISR Team. View of the Keith A. Howard, [email protected], or Gerald M. Ross, Soyuz TMA-2 spacecraft docked to the cargo [email protected]. block on the International Space Station. GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173 USPS 0456-530) is published 11 Image courtesy of the crew of ISS Expedition times per year, monthly, with a combined April/May issue, by The Geological Society of America, Inc., with offices at 3300 Penrose 7, NASA. Place, Boulder, Colorado. Mailing address: P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, U.S.A. Periodicals postage paid at Boulder, Colorado, and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to GSA Today, GSA Sales and Service, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140. Copyright © 2004, The Geological Society of America, Inc. (GSA). Geoscience in a Changing World: Denver 2004 All rights reserved.
  • Tectonic Evolution of Western Colorado and Eastern Utah D

    Tectonic Evolution of Western Colorado and Eastern Utah D

    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Tectonic evolution of western Colorado and eastern Utah D. L. Baars and G. M. Stevenson, 1981, pp. 105-112 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
  • Xsec A-A Sht1of2 Layout FINAL V

    Xsec A-A Sht1of2 Layout FINAL V

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 3425 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (SHEET 1 OF 2) Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map A Ontario Allegheny Lowlands Plateau province province SEVERNE WATKINS-BEAVER LODI POINT FIRTREE DAMS ALPINE VAN ETTEN ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE GLENORA SYNCLINE UNNAMED COHOCTON CORBETT POINT ENFIELD CAYUTA SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE Bend in section Bend in section Bend in section New York W SE Oatka Genesee NW SE Canisteo NW SW Pennsylvania Black Creek River Canaseraga River Tuscarora Creek Creek Creek FEET MILES 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 3,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 William Duchscherer, Jr. E.F. Blair and Associates NYS Natural Gas Company E.F. Blair and Associates Bowdoin Storage Service Inc. NYS Natural Gas Company No. 1 J. Klotzbach No. 1 L. Tyler No. 1 Albert McClurg No. 1 Arthur N. Kennedy No. 1 Hubbard No. 1 Robert Olin API No. 31-037-05117 API No. 31-037-04593 API No. 31-051-04552 API No. 31-051-04630 API No. 31-101-21496 API No. 31-101-03924 Genesee Co., New York Genesee Co., New York Livingston Co., New York Livingston Co., New York Steuben Co., New York Steuben Co., New York Perrysburg Formation Dunkirk Dunkirk Shale Shale 2,000 Member Wiscoy Sandstone Member Java Perrysburg West River Shale, Nunda Wiscoy Sandstone Member Formation Formation Genundewa Sandstone Member unnamed Pipe Creek 0 Pipe Creek shale member Limestone, Penn Member Shale Member Shale Member Perrysburg Yan Shale, and rmation Formation 0 Dun West River Shale, Java Fo kirk
  • Dextral Shear Along the Eastern Margin of the Colorado Plateau: a Kinematic Link Between Laramide Contraction and Rio Grande Rifting (Ca

    Dextral Shear Along the Eastern Margin of the Colorado Plateau: a Kinematic Link Between Laramide Contraction and Rio Grande Rifting (Ca

    Dextral Shear along the Eastern Margin of the Colorado Plateau: A Kinematic Link between Laramide Contraction and Rio Grande Rifting (Ca. 75–13 Ma) Author(s): Tim F. Wawrzyniec, John W. Geissman, Marc D. Melker, and Mary Hubbard Source: The Journal of Geology, Vol. 110, No. 3 (May 2002), pp. 305-324 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/339534 . Accessed: 02/06/2014 15:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Geology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.123.127.4 on Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:34:30 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Dextral Shear along the Eastern Margin of the Colorado Plateau: A Kinematic Link between Laramide Contraction and Rio Grande Rifting (Ca. 75–13 Ma) Tim F. Wawrzyniec,1 John W. Geissman, Marc D. Melker,2 and Mary Hubbard3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Kinematic data associated with both Laramide-age and -style and Rio Grande rift-related structures show that the latest Cretaceous to Neogene interaction between the Colorado Plateau and the North American craton was domi- nantly coupled with a component of dextral shear.
  • Key, M. M., Jr. and N. Potter, Jr. 1992

    Key, M. M., Jr. and N. Potter, Jr. 1992

    Guidebook for the llth Annual Field Trip of the Harrisburg Area Geological Society May 9, 1992 Paleozoic Geology of the Paw Paw-Hancock Area of Maryland and West Virginia by Marcus M. Key, Jr. and Noel Potter, Jr. Dickinson College TABLE OF CONTENTS . .. List of F1gures . .............................................. 111 Introduction . ....................................... · ......... 1 Road Log • ..•... • ..... · .... • •.....•....•...•......• e ••• '0 ••••••••• 3 Stop 1. Roundtop Hill . ............ o •••••••••• o •••••••••••••••••• 5 stop 2. Sideling Hill Road Cut ..•.••............••.••••......... 8 Stop 3. Sideling Hill Diamictite Exposure ....•.•....•.•....•... 11 Stop 4. Cacapon Mountain Overlook .••.......•......•.•••••...... 15 Stop 5. Fluted Rocks Overlook .•..•••.••....•.•.•••.•........... 16 Stop 6. Fluted Rocks ................. .,. .......... ., o ••••• ., •••••• • 19 Stop 7. Berkeley Springs state Park •...•.....................•. 20 Acknowled·gments . ........................... :- ... e ••••••••••••••• 21 References .....••.•..•.•••.•..•.•..•.••......................•. 2 2 Topogrpphic maps covering field trip stops: USGS 7 1/2 minute quadrangles Bellegrove (MD-PA-WV), Great Cacapon (WV-MD), Hancock (WV-MD-PA) Cover Photo: Anticline in Silurian Bloomsburg Formation. From Stose and swartz (1912). The anticline is visible from the towpath of the c & 0 Canal at Roundtop Hill (Stop# 1). Guidebook copies may be obtained by writing: Harrisburg Area Geological Society cjo Pennsylvania Geological Survey P.O. Box 2357 Harrisburg,
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]

    Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]

    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
  • Back Matter (PDF)

    Back Matter (PDF)

    Index Page numbers in italics refer to Figures. Page numbers in bold refer to Tables. Abadeh Section (Iran) 74, 81, 83, 112 Annweiler Formation 397 Abadehceras 198 Anomalonema reumauxi–Peudestheria simoni assemblage Abichites 199 zone 370, 372–373 Abo Formation 73, 408, 409, 412, 425 Antarctica, palynostratigraphy 337 Abrahamskraal Formation 64, 78, 80, 418, 428 Anthracolithic System 25 radiometric dating 86 Anuites 193 Abrek Formation 295 Apache Dam Formation 409 acritarchs 322–323 Aquaw Creek (Colorado), magnetic polarity data 66 Admiral Formation 410 Arabia, palynostratigraphy 333, 333 Adrianites 194 Arabia Plate, fusuline biostratigraphy 255 A. elegans 195 Araksian Stage 40 Afghanistan Arasella 199 fusuline biostratigraphy 255, 260–261 Araxoceras spp. 196, 198 Agathiceras 187, 189 A. latissimum 198 Aidaralash CreekGSSP (Kazakstan)3, 28,29, 32, 53,67, 88,187,321,325 A. ventrosulcatum 198 Akiyoshi Terrane, fusuline biostratigraphy 270–271, 271 Archer City Formation 410, 411 Akmilleria 189 archosaurs 51 Aktastinian Substage 2, 33, 189 Argentina ammonoid assemblages 185 magnetic polarity data 64, 69, 72 Aktasty River Section 33 palynostratigraphy 330, 331, 331 Aktastynian Stage, ammonoid assemblages 185 tetrapods 387 Aktubinskia 189 Aricoceras 192 Aktyubinsk section 33 Aristoceras 187 Al Khlata Formation 336 Aristoceratoides 194 Alaska Region, fusuline biostratigraphy 255 Arizona, tetrapods 412–413 Albaillella cavitata interval zone 154, 157 Arnhardtia 39 Albaillella excelsa interval zone 155 Arrayo de Alamillo Formation 395, 409 Albaillella levis interval zone 155 Arroya del Agua Formation 408, 409, 425 Albaillella sinuata abindance zone 148–149 Arroya Formation 410 Albaillella triangularis interval zone 155, 157 Arroyo Vale Formation 411 Albaillella xiaodongensis assemblage zone 148 Artinskia spp.