DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology of the Elkton Area Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology of the Elkton Area Virginia Geology of the Elkton area Virginia GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 230 Geology of the Elkton area Virginia By PHILIP B. KING GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 230 A detailed report on an area containing interesting problems of stratigraphy', structure, geomorphology, and economic geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1950 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.75 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-- _ ________________________________________ 1 Stratigraphy—Continued Introduction. ______________________________________ 1 Cambrian system—Continued Previous work. _ ____________________________________ 2 Elbrook dolomite.________-_____._--_-__-__. 32 Present work. ______________________________________ 3 Name._ _____________-_-_-____---_____- 32 Acknowledgments. _________________________________ 3 Outcrop.____-___-------_--___----.-___ 32 Geography.. _ ______________________________________ 4 Character, _____________________________ 32 Stratigraphy _______________________________________ 6 Age_.____-_..-__-_---_--___------_-_._ 32 Pre-Cambrian rocks__ . __________________________ 7 Residuum of Elbrook dolomite ___________ 33 Injection complex. __________________________ 8 Stratigraphic relations-__________________ 33 Name. _ ----_-______----________-_-_-__ 8 Conococheague limestone.___________________ 33 Outcrop. ______________________________ 8 Name __-__________-_--______---------_ 33 Character and origin. _ __________________ 8 Outcrop.-___-_-_-_------__-_---------- 33 Jointing and weathering. _ _______________ 9 Character_ _.-_____.-_________--__---_ 33 Greenstone intrusives in injection complex. 9 Age._-____-______-------__-__--------- 34 Occurrence of blue quartz in rocks of injec­ Residuum of Conococheague limestone-___ 34 tion complex. ________________________ 9 Stratigraphic relations.__________________ 34 Swift Run formation ________________________ 9 Ordovician system._____________________________ 35 Name_ _ _----______---_--_________-____ 9 Beekmaiytown dolomite (including Chepultepec Outcrop _-__---__-__-__--____-___-___-_ ia limestone) _______________________________ 35 General features, _______________________ 10 Name _________________________________ 35 Local features. _________________________ 10 Outcrop-______________________________ 35 Stratigraphic relations- _ _________________ 11 Character___ _ __________________________ 35 Regional relations __ __________________ 11 Fossils.—_ — -__ __--------------------_ 36 Catoctin greenstone- ________________________ 12 Weathering features of Beekmantown Name _________________________________ 12 dolomite. __.-_-_____-___-_____--___-_ 36 Outcrop- -____________________________'_ 12 Stratigraphic relations__________-_-_--___ 37 Character____ _ _________________________ 12 Limestones of Middle Ordovician age_-_---_-_- 37 Thickness and stratigraphic relations- _____ 13 Outcrop.________________.____----_--__ 37 Regional relations of unconformity above Classification. __ ________________________ 37 Catoctin greenstone- __________________ 13 Character_________________________ 38 Age____- ------______-________.________ 14 Stratigraphic relations.__________________ 38 Cambrian system- _ _____________________________ 14 Martinsburg shale__________________________ 38 Chilhowee group_ ___________________________ 14 Silurian system.._______________________________ 39 Name. ________________________________ 14 Sandstones of Silurian age.__________________ 39 Description by Rogers___ _ _-_-____-_--___ 15 Triassic (?) system______________-_______-_______ 39 Subdivisions. __________________________ 15 Intrusive igneous rocks________-___--_----_-_ 39 Loudoun formation. ___-_____-___-_-____ 16 Tectonics.____________--_______-_-_-_-__----_--____ 39 Weverton formation. _____ ____.-__--___-_ 17 Structural features of pre-Cambrian age__._-___.__ 39 Harpers formation. ... __________________ 19 Relations of pre-Cambrian rocks to Chilhowee Antietam quartzite __ _ _ _________--.___- 20 group._ _________________________________ 39 Broader relations of Chilhowee group_-___- 23 Interpretation of structural features of pre- Tomstown dolomite.. _ ______________________ 24 Cambrian age_ _______-_-___-.____-____--- 41 Name _-_-___-______--_-____-__________ 24 Structural features of late Paleozoic (Appalachian) Outcrop __-_-___-____-_-_________-___-_ 24 age________________.____-__-_-_-_----_-.__- 41 General features. _______________________ 25 General character.-_____________________ 41 Age.--_ ----_-----__-__--__-_-__---__-_ 25 Discussion of illustrations._______________ 42 Tomstown dolomite in outcrop. __^_______ 25 Description of larger structural features _______ 42 Subsurface Tomstown dolomite.. _________ 26 Shenandoah Salient-____________________ 42 Basal beds of Tomstown dolomite__----__- 28 Area north of Shenandoah Salient-________ 43 Residuum of Tomstown dolomite ____--__. 28 Area west of Shenandoah Salient-________ 43 Stratigraphic relations- __________________ 30 Elkton Embayment_-._________---____-. 44 Waynesboro formation ______________________ 30 Hanse Mountain area.__________-__-_--_ 44 Name. ________________________________ 30 Area northwest of Hanse Mountain area_ 45 Outcrop. ______________________________ 30 Interpretation of larger structural features. _ _ _ _ 45 Character _ _ _______________________ _ _ 30 Restoration of structure above and below 31 surface-_____________________________ 45 Residuum of Waynesboro formation. 31 Interpretation of Stanley fault__________ 47 Stratigraphic relations- ____________ 32 Problem of "Blue Ridge overthrust" ______ 47 m IV CONTENTS Page Page Tectonics—Continued Economic geology—________________________________ 63 Structural features of late Paleozoic—Continued Iron and manganese________________-_----___-_ 63 Special structural features___________________ 50 General character of deposits_______________ 63 Slaty cleavage________________________ 50 Summary of production_________________ 63 Jointing and veining____________________ 51 Reserves__ _ ________________----___--_ 64 Rock flowage and disharmonic folding. _ _ _ _ 51 Occurrence__ _________________________ 64 Gravity data________________-____________-_ 52 Character_ _______________-------_-___ 65 Cenozoic deposits and land forms.____________________ 52 Origin. ________________________________ 65 Upland areas___________________________________ 53 Mines.____________________________________ 66 Possible high-level peneplains ________________ 53 Stanley mine.______________-_-_---___._ 66 Character_ _ __________________________ 53 Honey Run mine_____________--_---____ 67 Age_ _ _________________________________ 54 Ingham mine_________________________ 67 Possible intermediate peneplain.______________ 54 Little ore bank_________________________ 68 Operations of Shenandoah Iron Works___ 68 Valley floor.___________________________________ 54 Smith bank____-_-___-_____________ 69 Residuum. _ _ _____________________________ 54 Boyer mine.___________-___---_---_____ 70 Character. ____________________________ 54 Kimball bank_____________________-_-__ 70 Thickness____ _ _________________________ 54 Baker bank_____--____-__--------__---_ 71 Origin.________________________________ 55 Garrison bank______-_______-___-______- 71 Deposits between residuum and older gravel Watson tract_________________________ 72 unit— _ ______________________________ 57 Fox Mountain mine.____________________ 73 Ancient gravel unit at Stanley mine.______ 57 Elkton mines_________-_-_____---_-_-- 74 Related deposits in other areas_'__________ 57 Seller mine__-___----_--------------_-_- 76 Age of residuum and of deposits between Ocher__________.___________________. 76 residuum and older gravel unit _________ -58 Mines___________________________________ 76 Gravel deposits_____________________________ 58 Stanley deposits-________-_-_--_----_--_ 76 Older gravel unit _______________________ 58 Naked Creek deposit_________-__-_-___-_ 77 Intermediate gravel unit.________________ 59 Limestone and dolomite-______________-_---_---_ 77 Younger gravel unit___________________ 60 Quarries. __________________________________ 77 Regional relations of gravel deposits______ 60 Elkton Lime & Stone Co. quarry________ 77 Origin and age of gravel deposits _________ 60 Quarries near Shenandoah _______________ 77 Relations between features of valley floor______ 62 Other quarries___----____-___--_-___--__ 77 Talus_______________________________________ 62 Building stone________________________________ 78 Character________________________________ 62 Copper and magnetite.__________________________ 78 Origin_____________________________________ 63 References cited.____________-_______-___-__--__--__ 78 Alluvium. _____________________________________ 63 Index.__-_-___-_-_---________---_---------_--_---- 81 TABLES Page Geological formations of the Elkton area________________________________-_-_-_---_-_----------__---------------- 6 Stratigraphic section of upper part of Tomstown dolomite near head of valley of Crooked Run__________________________ 26 Results of tests on dolomite from U. S. Bureau of Mines drill hole No. 2 on Watson tract__----------_-----------------_ 27 Results of tests on dolomite from U. S. Bureau of Mines drill hole No. 1 on tract south of Giants Grave_____------------- 27 Results of tests on dolomite from U. S. Bureau of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Syntectonic Deposition of Lower to Middle Silurian Sandstones, Central Shenandoah Valley, Virginia W
    Vol. 24 February 1978 No. 1 SYNTECTONIC DEPOSITION OF LOWER TO MIDDLE SILURIAN SANDSTONES, CENTRAL SHENANDOAH VALLEY, VIRGINIA W. P. Roberts1 and J. S. Kite2 The stratigraphy of the Upper Ordovician to It is proposed that the differences in thickness Middle Silurian rocks of the Massanutten between the quartz arenite formations to the west of synclinorium in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia the Shenandoah Valley and the Massanutten contrasts sharply with the stratigraphy in the Sandstone are, at least partially, a result of defor- folded part of the Valley and Ridge province to the mation penecontemporaneously with deposition west (Figure 1).Five formations between the top of during the Taconic orogeny. Downfolding may have the Martinsburg Formation (Middle and Upper begun in the Massanutten synclinorium area while Ordovician) and the top of the Keefer Sandstone an arch may have been forming to the west (Figure (Middle Silurian) crop out in the Cove Mountain 2) (Rader and Perry, 1976). Assuming such a outcrop belt to the west of the Shenandoah Valley, pattern of deformation, the thickness of the quartz whereas the Massanutten Sandstone represents the sand deposits should be greater in the synclinal same time span in Massanutten Mountain (Figure 2). trough than over the arch. The direction of current Only two of the formations that are exposed west flow should also have been influenced by the of the Shenandoah Valley, the Tuscarora Formation tectonics. Currents would probably flow down the and the Keefer Sandstone, contain quartz arenite in axis of a synclinal trough whereas they would flow the same abundance as that found in the Massa- away from the crest of an arch.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster County Geology
    LancasterLancaster CountyCounty GeologyGeology gfgh µ OverOver TopographicTopographic ReliefRelief Om Miles Í897 0 10 hg Lebanon County Adamstown ¦¨§76 ! Berks County Oha ! Oo Denver ab322 Ephrata Csc Í501 ! Í72 TRh 272 TRn Oco Lititz Í ! Akron Elizabethtown Manheim ! Dauphin County! ! TRhc Cr TRs c Os Rn ! T Terre Hill TRg Trd 322 772 ab 10 Í 222 625 Í ab Í897 Í Í283 Ohm Í230 Oan Í241 East New Holland Oe 722 Petersburg Í Cbs ! Mount Joy ! ! Czc Cch Í23 Cm gga fl R 743 T Í Csb gg pg ggd Í441 Ck Cl 772 72 Í 23 Í ! Í Ca Marietta Ch Lancaster Mountville ! 340 ! Í Columbia 30 ! ! ba Í462 Í462 ab30 Í999 Millersville Ccc Strasburg ! ! Cv Í741 Í741 Í272 41 Í County Chester 896 222 Í gn Christiana ba mg ! oct Cah Í372 S u sq u e h a n n a R iv e r Y o rk C o u n ty gqm LEGEND COUNTY BOUNDARIES Í324 Source: Lancaster County GIS, Copyright (c) 2019 MAJOR ROADS This map to be used for reference or illustrative purposes only. This map FAULT is not a legally recorded plan, survey, or engineering schematic Quarryville and it is not intended to be used as such. For complete disclaimer see: RIVERS AND STREAMS ! http://www.co.lancaster.pa.us/gisdisclaimer DIKE wc ORDOVICIAN Í472 Oan, ANNVILLE FORMATION LIMESTONE TRIASSIC 372 Oco, COCALICO FORMATION DARK GRAY SHALE TRfl, LIMESTONE FANGLOMERATE Í TRg, GETTYSBURG FORMATION SHALE-SANDSTONE Oe, EPLER FORMATION LIMESTONE TRh, HAMMER CREEK FORMATION SANDSTONE-SHALE Oha, ANNVILLE, HERSHEY, AND MYERSTOWN FORMATION TRhc, HAMMER CREEK QUARTZ-CONGLOMERATE Ohm, HERSHEY AND MYERSTOWN FORMATION LIMESTONE 272 TRn, NEW
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ridge Anticlinorium in Central Virginia
    VILLARD S. GRIFFIN, JR. Department of Chemistry and Geology, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29631 Fabric Relationships Across the Catoctin Mountain- Blue Ridge Anticlinorium in Central Virginia ABSTRACT a subhorizontal northeast-bearing lineation. A diagram of poles to mica cleavages defines Study of planar and linear subfabrics across a subfabric characterized by a complete girdle the Catoctin Mountain-Blue Ridge anticlin- similar to the s-pole T-girdle, but having a orium in central Virginia suggests distinct /3 pole bearing 17 degrees closer to due north. differences in the kinematic history of the The Catoctin Mountain-Blue Ridge anti- core and flanks of the anticlinorium. The clinorium in central Virginia is similar to its Precambrian basement complex gneisses in extension in Maryland and Pennsylvania and the core of the anticlinorium record the possesses the same cleavage and foliation fan effects of penetrative deformation in the a evident in the anticlinorium there. The anti- direction. Maxima of mica cleavage poles clinorium in central Virginia, however, has form a complete girdle subnormal to the fewer similarities with the Grandfather pronounced down-dip lineation of elongated Mountain Window area southwestward in minerals. Northeast-striking foliation pro- North Carolina. Like the rocks in the Window duces well-defined maxima that have a poorly area, the Precambrian basement rocks in the developed partial ir-girdle. anticlinorium are profoundly deformed Piedmont rocks in the James River syn- cataclastically and have a pronounced cata- clinorium, on the eastern limb of the Catoctin clastic a lineation. Unlike the rocks in the Mountain-Blue Ridge anticlinorium have an Window area, those in the Piedmont part of s-surface pattern somewhat similar to that of the anticlinorium do not have a pronounced the basement gneisses, but with a better de- cataclastic fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Is Afton Mountain? Christopher M
    Worthy Field Locales THE GEOLOGY of VIRGINIA Mind the Gap! Where is Afton Mountain? Christopher M. Bailey, College of William & Mary Ask Virginians where the top of Afton y e Mountain is located, and they will ll likely tell you “it’s the place where a V s Interstate 64 crosses the Blue Ridge h n Mountains between Charlottesville and a i o ta Staunton”. The trouble with that de- d n n u scription is this: Interstate 64 crests the a o Blue Ridge Mountains at Rockfish Gap. n M e So where exactly is Afton Mountain? h Waynesboro S Look on the U.S. Geological Survey’s ge topographic map of the area and you’ll id not find an Afton Mountain. Afton is a R I-64 small town located on the slopes of the Blue Ridge about a mile to the east of Rockfish Gap. Interstate 64 cuts a long e gentle grade across the southern slope lu Rockfish of the Blue Ridge topping out at 1900 ft B Gap (580 m) above sea level at Rockfish Gap before descending westward into the 0 3 miles Shenandoah Valley. Rockfish Gap has 0 5 N long been an important nexus between kilometers the Piedmont and Shenandoah Valley, False color satellite image of the Blue Ridge Mountains, Shenandoah but as we shall see it is also a fascinat- Valley, and Rockfish Gap. ing geological locale. Rockfish Gap C. M. Bailey, W&M Geology Oblique aerial photo of Rockfish Gap and the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains as viewed from the south-southeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Paleomagnetic Evidence for Oroclinal Rotation in the Central Folded Appalachians from the Bloomsburg and the Mauch Chunk Formations
    TECTONICS, VOL. 7, NO. 4, PAGES 749-759, AUGUST 1988 FURTHER PALEOMAGNETIC EVIDENCE FOR OROCLINAL ROTATION IN THE CENTRAL FOLDED APPALACHIANS FROM THE BLOOMSBURG AND THE MAUCH CHUNK FORMATIONS Dennis V. Kent Lamont-DohertyGeological Observatory and Departmentof GeologicalSciences ColumbiaUniversity, Palisades, New York Abstract.Renewed paleomagnetic investigations of red fromthe Bloomsburg, Mauch Chunk, and revised results bedsof theUpper Silurian Bloomsburg and the Lower recentlyreported for theUpper Devonian Catskill Formation Carboniferous Mauch Chunk Formations were undertaken togetherindicate 22.8•>+_11.9 oof relativerotation, accounting with theobjective of obtainingevidence regarding the for approximatelyhalf thepresent change in structuraltrend possibilityof oroclinalbending as contributing to thearcuate aroundthe Pennsylvania salient. The oroclinalrotation can be structuraltrend of thePennsylvania salient. These formations regardedas a tightenS.*'.3 o/'a lessarcuate depositional package cropout on both limbs of thesalient and earlier, but less thatdeveloped across a basementreentrant, to achievea definitivepaleomagnetic studies on these units indicate that curvaturecloser to that of the earlierzigzag continental margin earlyacquired magnetizations can be recovered. Oriented outline. sampleswere obtained from nine sites on the southern limb of thesalient and eight sites from the northern limb in the INTRODUCTION Bloomsburg.The naturalremanent magnetizations are multivectorial,dominated by a component(B) with a A testof the oroclinehypothesis
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park Meghan Lindsey University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Tampa Library Faculty and Staff ubP lications Tampa Library 2008 Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park Meghan Lindsey University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tlib_facpub Part of the Education Commons Scholar Commons Citation Lindsey, Meghan, "Let's Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park" (2008). Tampa Library Faculty and Staff Publications. 1. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tlib_facpub/1 This Data is brought to you for free and open access by the Tampa Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tampa Library Faculty and Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SSACgnp.RA776.ML1.1 Let’s Take a Hike in Catoctin Mountain Park How many Calories will you burn off hiking a five-mile loop trail? Core Quantitative Literacy Topics Slope; contour maps Core Geoscience Subject Topographic maps Supporting Quantitative Literacy Topics Unit Conversions Arctangent, radians Reading Graphs Image from: http://www.nps.gov/cato Ratios and Proportions Percent increase Meghan Lindsey Department of Geology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620 © 2008 University of South Florida Libraries. All rights reserved. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number NSF DUE-0836566. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. 1 Getting started After completing this module you should be able to: • use Excel spreadsheet to make your calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lexington Quadrangle Virginia
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE LEXINGTON QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA KENNETH F. BICK REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS I VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1960 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE LEXINGTON QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA KENNETH F. BICK REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS I VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1960 Couuowwoer,rn op Vtncrwre DopenrupNr op Puncnesrs exo Supptv Rrculroxn 1960 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond. Virginia MenvrN M. SurHnnr,eNn, Director BOARD Vrcron W. Stnwenr, Petersburg, Chairtnan G. Ar,vrn MessnNnunc, Hampton, Viee'Chairman A. Pr,urvrnr BmnNn, Orange C. S. Cenrnn, Bristol ANpnpw A. Fenr,pv, Danville WonrnrrvcroN FauLKNEn, Glasgow SvoNpv F. Slter,r,, Roanoke EnwrN H. Wrr,r,, Richmond Wrr,r,renr P. Wooor,nv. Norfolk CONTENTS Pece Abstract. '"*i"#:;;;;: . : ::: , : ::.:::::::::..::::::. :.::.::::::: ::,r Z Geography 8 Purpose. 4 Previous Work. Present Work and Acknowledgements. 5 Geologic Formations. 6 Introduction. 6 Precambrian System. 6 Pedlar formation 6 Precambrian and Cambrian Systems. 6 Discussion. 6 Swift Run formation 8 Catoctin greenstone. I Unieoiformation...... ......... I Hampton(Harpers)formation. .......... I Erwin (Antietam) quartzite. Cambrian System . I0 Shady (Tomstown) dolomite 10 Rome (Waynesboro) formation.... ll Elbrook formation. 12 Conococheague limestone. l3 Ordovician System. ......., 14 Chepultepeclimestone. .......... 14 Beekmantown formatron. 14 New Market limestone. 15 Lincolnshire limestone. 16 Edinburg formation. 16 Martinsburg shale... 17 SilurianSystem. ......... 18 Clinchsandstone..... .......... 18 Clinton formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Signal Knob Northern Massanutten Mountain Catback Mountain Browns Run Southern Massanutten Mountain Five Areas of Around 45,000 Acres on the Lee the West
    Sherman Bamford To: [email protected] <[email protected] cc: Sherman Bamford <[email protected]> > Subject: NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage draft multi-species habitat conservation plan comments - attachments 2 12/13/2011 03:32 PM Sherman Bamford Forests Committee Chair Virginia Chapter – Sierra Club P.O. Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015 [email protected] (540) 343-6359 December 13, 2011 Regional Director, Midwest Region Attn: Lisa Mandell U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990 Bloomington, MN 55437-1458 Email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Mandell: On behalf of the Virginia Chapter of Sierra Club, the following are attachments to our previously submitted comments on the the NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage (“NiSource”) draft multi-species habitat conservation plan (“HCP”) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (“Service”) draft environmental impact statement (“EIS”). Draft of Virginia Mountain Treasures For descriptions and maps only. The final version was published in 2008. Some content may have changed between 2007 and 2008. Sherman Bamford Sherman Bamford PO Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015-1102 (540) 343-6359 [email protected] Virginia’s Mountain Treasures ART WORK DRAWING The Unprotected Wildlands of the George Washington National Forest A report by the Wilderness Society Cover Art: First Printing: Copyright by The Wilderness Society 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202)-843-9453 Wilderness Support Center 835 East Second Avenue Durango, CO 81302 (970) 247-8788 Founded in 1935, The Wilderness Society works to protect America’s wilderness and to develop a nation- wide network of wild lands through public education, scientific analysis, and advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Landforms of Virginia
    Vol. 34 August 1988 No. 3 SCENIC LANDFORMS OF VIRGINIA Harry Webb . Virginia has a wide variety of scenic landforms, such State Highway, SR - State Road, GWNF.R(T) - George as mountains, waterfalls, gorges, islands, water and Washington National Forest Road (Trail), JNFR(T) - wind gaps, caves, valleys, hills, and cliffs. These land- Jefferson National Forest Road (Trail), BRPMP - Blue forms, some with interesting names such as Hanging Ridge Parkway mile post, and SNPMP - Shenandoah Rock, Devils Backbone, Striped Rock, and Lovers Leap, National Park mile post. range in elevation from Mt. Rogers at 5729 feet to As- This listing is primarily of those landforms named on sateague and Tangier islands near sea level. Two nat- topographic maps. It is hoped that the reader will advise ural lakes occur in Virginia, Mountain Lake in Giles the Division of other noteworthy landforms in the st& County and Lake Drummond in the City of Chesapeake. that are not mentioned. For those features on private Gaps through the mountains were important routes for land always obtain the owner's permission before vis- early settlers and positions for military movements dur- iting. Some particularly interesting features are de- ing the Civil War. Today, many gaps are still important scribed in more detail below. locations of roads and highways. For this report, landforms are listed alphabetically Dismal Swamp (see Chesapeake, City of) by county or city. Features along county lines are de- The Dismal Swamp, located in southeastern Virginia, scribed in only one county with references in other ap- is about 10 to 11 miles wide and 15 miles long, and propriate counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in The
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-K Chapter K Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER, ANITA G. HARRIS, and JOHN E. REPETSKI Stratigraphic framework of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence in part of the central Appalachian basin and the structure of underlying block-faulted basement rocks U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ryder, Robert T. Stratigraphic framework of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in the central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through southwestern and south-central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia / by Robert T. Ryder, Anita C. Harris, and John E. Repetski. p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Appalachian Basin ; ch. K) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839-K) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1839-K 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cambrian.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Development in Strata of Ordovician-And Silurian-Devonian- Age in Highland County, Virginia
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons OES Theses and Dissertations Ocean & Earth Sciences Summer 2007 Cave Development in Strata of Ordovician-and Silurian-Devonian- Age in Highland County, Virginia Carol Ann Peterson Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/oeas_etds Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, Carol A.. "Cave Development in Strata of Ordovician-and Silurian-Devonian-Age in Highland County, Virginia" (2007). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Ocean & Earth Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/t7pt-2404 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/oeas_etds/20 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Ocean & Earth Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in OES Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAVE DEVELOPMENT IN STRATA OF ORDOVICIAN- AND SILURIAN-DEVONIAN-AGE IN HIGHLAND COUNTY, VIRGINIA by Carol Ann Peterson B.S. August 2002, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of tine Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE GEOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2007 Approved by: ;ar (Director) Dennis A. Darby (Membes Donald J. P. Swift (Member) limes F. Coble (Member) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT CAVE DEVELOPMENT IN STRATA OF ORDOVICIAN- AND SILURIAN-DEVONIAN-AGE IN HIGHLAND COUNTY, VIRGINIA Carol Ann Peterson Old Dominion University, 2007 Director: Dr. G. Richard Whittecar Picturesque Highland County, Virginia, also known as "Virginia's Little Switzerland", is characterized by high mountains, tranquil rivers, and hundreds of caves.
    [Show full text]