DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Wildlife and Botanical Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Wildlife and Botanical Annual Report 20190523-5023 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/22/2019 6:42:20 PM Via Electronic Filing May 22, 2019 Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 1st Street N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Subject: Wells Hydroelectric Project – FERC Project No. 2149 2018 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2019 Work Plan Dear Secretary Bose: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County, Washington (Douglas PUD), licensee for the Wells Hydroelectric Project No. 2149 (Wells Project) respectfully submits the enclosed annual report titled: 2018 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2019 Work Plan. This report describes the implementation of activities conducted during calendar year 2018 in compliance with Article 409 of the license for the Wells Project, and the terms of the Wildlife and Botanical Management Plan (WBMP), Avian Protection Plan (APP) and Off-License Settlement Agreement. The enclosed report also includes a description of the measures to be implemented during calendar year 2019 in association with the same resource protection plans and agreements. Article 409 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license for the Wells Project requires Douglas PUD to implement the WBMP filed with the FERC on May 27, 2010 as Appendix E-3 of Exhibit E of the Final License Application. Article 409 also requires the development of an annual report that documents the results of the prior year’s measures and describes the upcoming year’s proposed measures pursuant to the WBMP. Article 409 further requires Douglas PUD to annually update the list of sensitive plant species found in the WBMP based upon an annual review of the Washington Natural Heritage Program rare plant list, and it requires Douglas PUD to develop the WBMP annual repor t and work plan in consultation with specific federal and state agencies and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.1 Douglas PUD is required to submit the annual report and work plan to the FERC by May 31st of each year following license issuance. 1 The Terrestrial Resources Work Group is composed of representatives from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Bureau of Land Management, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington State Department of Ecology, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and Douglas PUD. 20190523-5023 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/22/2019 6:42:20 PM In addition to Article 409, Ordering Paragraph (I) of the license directs Douglas PUD to implement the APP that was included within Appendix E-6 of Exhibit E of the Final License Application filed with the FERC on May 27, 2010. The Off-License Settlement Agreement is not a requirement of the FERC license.2 However, many of the measures funded by Douglas PUD, through this agreement, are also required measures contained within the WBMP. Because of the interrelated nature of all of the wildlife and botanical measures associated with the new license and the Off-License Settlement Agreement, Douglas PUD has elected to report on both actions within one report. The 2018 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2019 Work Plan provides a summary of all of the actions implemented by Douglas PUD in compliance with Article 409 of the license, and in compliance with the terms of the WBMP, APP and Off-License Settlement Agreement. The body of the report provides a summary of all of the actions implemented in compliance with the various plans and agreements. If you have any questions or require further information related to this report, please feel free to contact me at (509) 881-2208 or [email protected]. Sincerely, Shane Bickford Natural Resources Supervisor Enclosure: 2018 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2019 Work Plan Cc: Terrestrial Resource Work Group Jason Schilling – Douglas PUD Wells Compliance 2 In December 2007, Douglas PUD entered into an Off-License Settlement Agreement with the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The Off-License Settlement Agreement was filed with the FERC on May 27, 2010 as Appendix E-11 of Exhibit E of the Final License Application. The Off-License Settlement Agreement is not a requirement of the FERC license for the Wells Project. Instead, it is a contract between Douglas PUD and WDFW that addresses funding for various wildlife and botanical related projects located both within and adjacent to the Wells Project. 20190523-5023 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/22/2019 6:42:20 PM 2018 ANNUAL WILDLIFE AND BOTANICAL REPORT AND 2019 WORK PLAN WELLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC NO. 2149 May 2019 Prepared for: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County East Wenatchee, Washington © Copyright 2019. Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County. All Rights Reserved. 20190523-5023 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/22/2019 6:42:20 PM For copies of this Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report, contact: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County Attention: Natural Resources 1151 Valley Mall Parkway East Wenatchee, WA 98802-4497 Phone: (509) 884-7191 20190523-5023 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/22/2019 6:42:20 PM Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................1 3.0 WILDLIFE AND BOTANICAL MAMAGEMENT PLAN ..........................................3 3.1 Protect RTE Terrestrial Species Habitat on Wells Project Lands................3 3.1.1 American White Pelican ..............................................................................3 3.1.2 Sharp-tailed Grouse .....................................................................................4 3.2 Protect RTE Botanical Species from Land Disturbing Activities and Herbicide Sprays ..........................................................................................4 3.2.1 Resurvey Thompson’s Clover and Little Bluestem Protected Sites ............5 3.2.2 Ground Disturbing Activities and Weed Control at RTE Plant Protection Sites ............................................................................................5 3.2.3 Weed Control at Thompson Clover Sites ....................................................5 3.2.4 Washington Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant List (Updated List Requested 2/6/2017 ......................................................................................5 3.3 Conserve Habitat for Species on Wells Project Lands Protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act, Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and Migratory Bird Treaty Act ....................................................................6 3.3.1 Bald Eagle ....................................................................................................6 3.3.1.1 Bald Eagle Perches Pole Inspection .............................................................6 3.3.1.2 Bald Eagle Surveys ......................................................................................6 3.3.1.3 Protect Trees from Beaver Damage .............................................................7 3.3.1.4 Loss of Perch Trees due to Erosion .............................................................7 3.3.1.5 Protection of Small Trees.............................................................................8 3.3.2 Waterfowl ....................................................................................................8 3.4 Protect Wildlife Habitat on Wells Project Lands .........................................9 3.5 Maintain Productive Wildlife Habitat on the Cassimer Bar Wildlife Management Area ......................................................................................10 3.5.1 Weed Control .............................................................................................10 3.5.2 Access Management and Habitat Replacement .........................................10 3.5.3 Fencing .......................................................................................................10 3.5.4 Cassimer Bar Dikes....................................................................................10 3.5.5 Control Noxious Weeds on Project Lands .................................................11 3.5.6 Weed Map ..................................................................................................11 3.5.7 Weed Management Plan ............................................................................12 3.5.8 Preventing Weed Infestations ....................................................................12 3.6 Consultation ...............................................................................................13 4.0 WELLS 230 KV TRANSMISSION LINE AVIAN PROTECTION PLAN ...............13 4.1 Bird Flight Diverters ..................................................................................14 4.2 Record Keeping .........................................................................................14 4.3 Nest Management ......................................................................................14 4.4 Tree Removal .............................................................................................15 4.5 Training ......................................................................................................15 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report Page i Wells Project No. 2149 20190523-5023 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/22/2019 6:42:20 PM 4.6 Consultation ...............................................................................................16
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • W a S H in G T O N N a T U R a L H E R It
    PROGRAM HERITAGE NATURAL Status of Federally Listed Plant Taxa in Washington State Prepared for WASHINGTON U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 Prepared by Walter Fertig 28 June 2021 Natural Heritage Report 2021-01 1 Status of Federally Listed Plant Taxa in Washington State Award Number F18AF01216 Report Date: June 28, 2021 Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Region 1 Section 6 funding by Walter Fertig Botanist Washington Natural Heritage Program Washington Department of Natural Resources PO Box 47014 Olympia, WA 98504-7014 ii Cover: Ute ladies’ tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis). Photo by Walter Fertig, WNHP, 22 August 2018. Acknowledgements: Thanks to the following individuals for sharing data, providing reviews, or otherwise helping with this project: Jane Abel, Keith Abel, Jon Bakker, Susan Ballinger, Molly Boyter, Paula Brooks, Tom Brumbelow, Keyna Bugner, Tara Callaway, Jeff Chan, Alex Chmielewski, Karen Colson, Kelly Cordell, Ernie Crediford, Vicki Demetre, Nate Dietrich, Peter Dunwiddie, Ethan Coggins, Matt Fairbarns, Kim Frymire, John Gamon, Wendy Gibble, Rod Gilbert, Bridgette Glass, Sarah Hammon, Jamie Hanson, Anthony Hatcher, John Hill, Jasa Holt, Molly Jennings, Regina Johnson, Tom Kaye, Stacy Kinsell, Jake Kleinknecht, Hailee Leimbach-Maus, Joe LeMoine, Peter Lesica, Laurie Malmquist, Adam Martin, Heidi Newsome, Robert Pelant, Jenifer Penny, Von Pope, Tynan Ramm-Granberg, James Rebholz, Nathan Reynolds, Randi Riggs, Joe Rocchio, Jenny Roman, Mike Rule, Melissa Scholten, Sarah Shank, Mark Sheehan, Jacques Sirois, Karen Stefanyk, Mike Stefanyk, George Thornton, Sheri Whitfield, David Wilderman, and David Woodall. My apologies (and thanks!) to anyone I may have omitted. i Table of Contents Contents Introduction...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Roy Staab Four Seasons / Four Corners
    ROY STAAB FOUR SEASONS / CORNERS ROY STAAB FOUR SEASONS / CORNERS Institute of Visual Arts University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee July 10-September 27, 2009 with contributions by Suzaan Boettger Nicholas Frank John K. Grande Amy Lipton Institute of Visual Arts University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee July 10-September 27, 2009 Inova is grateful for the support of the Greater Milwaukee Foundation’s Mary L. Nohl Fund. Published by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Peck School of the Arts on the occasion of the exhibition ROY STAAB: FOUR SEASONS/FOUR CORNERS Organized by the Institute of Visual Arts (Inova) P.O. Box 413 Milwaukee, WI 53201 Phone: (414) 229-4762 Fax: (414) 229-6154 arts.uwm.edu © 2009 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be produced without the written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 9780981930114 Printed in the United States of America All photographs of installations by Roy Staab except: Michel Goday, figs. 2, 9 Gregg Schmidts, fig. 17 Leonard Freed, fig. 23 Nicholas Frank, fig. 33 Alan Magayne-Roshak, fig. 34 Additional credits: cover: Pyramid Space 7 - August 24, 1988 fig. 16: Digital Image © The Museum of Modern Art/Licensed by SCALA/Art Resource, NY fig. 18: Collection of the Gemeente Museum Den Haag. 1 (opposite) Fluke, 2008, Marbaek Beach near Esbjerg, Denmark 2 Port-Vendres, France, 1979 5 X MARKS THE STAAB Anyone who knows Roy Staab has experienced the discrepancy between 3 Dennis Oppenheim his personality and his artwork. His temporary environmental site installations Cancelled Crop, 1969 are the embodiment of calm, humility and silence.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion on USFS Aerial Application of Fire Retardants on NFS Lands
    2011 USFWS Biological Opinion on USFS Aerial Application of Fire Retardants on NFS Lands BIOLOGICAL OPINION Effects to Listed Species from U.S. Forest Service Aerial Application of Fire Retardants on National Forest System Lands Consultation Conducted by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Regions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8) December 6, 2011 Return to Table of Contents 1 | P a g e 2011 USFWS Biological Opinion on USFS Aerial Application of Fire Retardants on NFS Lands Table of Contents Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Consultation History ................................................................................................................................... 11 Species not likely to be adversely affected ................................................................................................. 17 BIOLOGICAL OPINION ................................................................................................................................. 27 Description of the Proposed Action ........................................................................................................ 27 Aerial Application of Fire Retardant Direction .................................................................................... 28 Reporting and Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2013 Work Plan
    20130423-5130 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 4/23/2013 2:31:26 PM Via Electronic Filing April 23, 2013 Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 1st Street N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Subject: Wells Hydroelectric Project – FERC Project No. 2149 2012 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2013 Work Plan Dear Secretary Bose: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County, Washington (Douglas PUD), licensee for the Wells Hydroelectric Project No. 2149 (Wells Project) respectfully submits the enclosed annual report titled: 2012 Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2013 Work Plan. This report describes the implementation of activities conducted during calendar year 2012 in compliance with Article 409 of the license for the Wells Project, and the terms of the Wildlife and Botanical Management Plan (WBMP), Avian Protection Plan (APP) and Off-License Settlement Agreement. The enclosed report also includes a description of the measures to be implemented during calendar year 2013 in association with these same resource protection plans and agreement. Article 409 of the new license for the Wells Project requires Douglas PUD to implement the WBMP filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on May 27, 2010 as Appendix E-3 of Exhibit E of the Final License Application. Article 409 also requires the development of an annual report that documents the results of the prior year’s measures and describes the upcoming year’s proposed measures pursuant to the WBMP. Article 409 further requires Douglas PUD to annually update the list of sensitive plant species found in the WBMP based upon an annual review of the Washington Natural Heritage Program rare plant list, and it requires Douglas PUD to develop the WBMP annual report and work plan in consultation with specific federal and state agencies and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.1 Douglas PUD is required to submit the annual report and work plan to the FERC by May 31st of each year following license issuance.
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Brett R. Lenz
    COLONIZER GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION A Dissertation DR. BRETT R. LENZ COLONIZER GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION, NORTH AMERICA Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester By Brett Reinhold Lenz Department of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester June 2011 1 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to Garreck, Haydn and Carver. And to Hank, for teaching me how rivers form. 2 Abstract This dissertation involves the development of a geologic framework applied to upper Pleistocene and earliest Holocene archaeological site discovery. It is argued that efforts to identify colonizer archaeological sites require knowledge of geologic processes, Quaternary stratigraphic detail and an understanding of basic soil science principles. An overview of Quaternary geologic deposits based on previous work in the region is presented. This is augmented by original research which presents a new, proposed regional pedostratigraphic framework, a new source of lithic raw material, the Beezley chalcedony, and details of a new cache of lithic tools with Paleoindian affinities made from this previously undescribed stone source. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The list of people who deserve my thanks and appreciation is large. First, to my parents and family, I give the greatest thanks for providing encouragement and support across many years. Without your steady support it would not be possible. Thanks Mom and Dad, Steph, Jen and Mellissa. To Dani and my sons, I appreciate your patience and support and for your love and encouragement that is always there. Due to a variety of factors, but mostly my own foibles, the research leading to this dissertation has taken place over a protracted period of time, and as a result, different stages of my personal development are likely reflected in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Strategy for Multi-Species at Risk in Vernal Pools and Other Ephemeral Wet Areas Associated with Garry Oak Ecosystems in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for Multi-Species at Risk in Vernal Pools and other Ephemeral Wet Areas Associated with Garry Oak Ecosystems in Canada Bog birds-foot trefoil Tall woolly-heads (Pacific population) Water plantain buttercup Kellogg’s rush Rosy owl clover Dwarf sandwort July 2006 About the Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003 and one of its purposes is “to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity.” What is recovery? In the context of species at risk conservation, recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of the species’ persistence in the wild. A species will be considered recovered when its long-term persistence in the wild has been secured. What is a recovery strategy? A recovery strategy is a planning document that identifies what needs to be done to arrest or reverse the decline of a species. It sets goals and objectives and identifies the main areas of activities to be undertaken. Detailed planning is done at the action plan stage. Recovery strategy development is a commitment of all provinces and territories and of three federal agencies — Environment Canada, Parks Canada Agency and Fisheries and Oceans Canada — under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together to Preserve the Past
    CUOURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT information for Parks, Federal Agencies, Trtoian Tribes, States, Local Governments, and %he Privale Sector <yt CRM TotLUME 18 NO. 7 1995 Working Together to Preserve the Past U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Cultural Resources PUBLISHED BY THE VOLUME 18 NO. 7 1995 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Contents ISSN 1068-4999 To promote and maintain high standards for preserving and managing cultural resources Working Together DIRECTOR to Preserve the Past Roger G. Kennedy ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Katherine H. Stevenson The Historic Contact in the Northeast EDITOR National Historic Landmark Theme Study Ronald M. Greenberg An Overview 3 PRODUCTION MANAGER Robert S. Grumet Karlota M. Koester A National Perspective 4 GUEST EDITOR Carol D. Shull Robert S. Grumet ADVISORS The Most Important Things We Can Do 5 David Andrews Lloyd N. Chapman Editor, NPS Joan Bacharach Museum Registrar, NPS The NHL Archeological Initiative 7 Randall J. Biallas Veletta Canouts Historical Architect, NPS John A. Bums Architect, NPS Harry A. Butowsky Shantok: A Tale of Two Sites 8 Historian, NPS Melissa Jayne Fawcett Pratt Cassity Executive Director, National Alliance of Preservation Commissions Pemaquid National Historic Landmark 11 Muriel Crespi Cultural Anthropologist, NPS Robert L. Bradley Craig W. Davis Archeologist, NPS Mark R. Edwards The Fort Orange and Schuyler Flatts NHL 15 Director, Historic Preservation Division, Paul R. Huey State Historic Preservation Officer, Georgia Bruce W Fry Chief of Research Publications National Historic Sites, Parks Canada The Rescue of Fort Massapeag 20 John Hnedak Ralph S. Solecki Architectural Historian, NPS Roger E. Kelly Archeologist, NPS Historic Contact at Camden NHL 25 Antoinette J.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1976 Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America Katherine Lee Hall Martin University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Katherine Lee Hall, "Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1976. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1226 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Katherine Lee Hall Martin entitled "Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Major C. R. McCollough, Paul W . Parmalee Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Katherine Lee Hall Mar tin entitled "Bone Flutes and Wh istles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America." I recormnend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a maj or in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]