DOCSLIB.ORG

The Final Resettlement of the Bakwena Ba Ga Molopyane at Tsetse--

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE FINAL RESETTLEMENT OF THE BAKWENA BA GA MOLOPYANE AT TSETSE-- , BY DAVIS YUMBA MINI-THESIS Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY IN THE FACULTY OF ARTS AT THE RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR : PROF G. VERHOEF MAY 1997 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A big thank you to the following people and institutions who made it possible for me to compile and write this mini-thesis; Professor G. Verhoef my supervisof4 for her wonderful.guidance, officials of the Rand Afrikaans University Library. officials of the State Archives in Pretoria, and officials of the Office of - Traditional Affairs in the North West Province Government. Special thanks to the former Acting Chief of the Bakwena Ba Ga Molopyane, Mr Melea Malefo and the tribesmen, Mpho Tire of Agricor-Statistical Data Centre, Mr Rasweswe, Mr Monoketsi, the Animal Health Officer of the Ramatlabama Area, David "Disha" Morupisi and Peter Tlome who accompanied me when visiting Potchefstroom, Ventersdorp and Mafikeng. SUMMARY The problem on which the study focuses is how the Bakwena Ba Ga Molopyane were affected by resettlement. It also. focuses on the reasons for the removal of the Bakwena from Uitkyk in 1931 and Doornkop in 1978;: . Attention is paid to the economic position of the tribe at the two farms. The study concentrates on the question of compensatory land, negative effects on the ability of the tribe as farmers, lack of employment opportunities, loss of livelihood and the state of despondency as a result of resettlement. Intensive primary research was conducted. Interviews were conducted in Tsetse in May 1995. The same number and type of prepared questions which required short and long answers were to be answered by the interviewees. A commercial white farmer in Ventersdorp as well as the chairperson of the Ventersdorp district agricultural union were also interviewed about the economic activities of the tribe in 1996. Secondary research was conducted by going through published secondary sources in the Rand Afrikaans University library and the Human Science Research Council library in Pretoria. The State Archives in Pretoria were visited to conduct primary archival research. The official documents consulted were those of the Department of Bantu Administration and Native Affairs Department. Matters concerning the buying and selling of land by blacks were handled by these departments. The State Ethnologist was visited to establish the link between the information gathered and the movement of the tribe. The Deeds Office in Pretoria was visited to consult registers regarding the transfer of land between the tribe and interested parties. There was a need to establish how, by whom and in whose name the land was owned. iii The North West Provincial Government was visited to confirm information $61 • the movement of the tribe, from Doornkop to Tsetse and com -pensation for land they relinquished at Doornkop. Primary research documents were consulted in the Office of Traditional Affairs. The Deeds Office in Mmabatho was also visited to establish in whose name the farms, Fairview and Ramatlabarnal portion 27, were registered. The study has established that by October 1996 compensatory land, the farm Fairview and portion 27 of Ramatlabama, had not been transferred and registered in the name of the tribe. Secondly, private owners who had been promised portion 1 of Fairview in exchange of portion 1(c) No. 186 of the farm Doornkop and portion 5 (of 3) of the farm Doornkop in the Ventersdorp district had also not been compensated. One of the results of resettlement was that the tribe was resettled in a dry area with insufficient rain. The soil in Tsetse is also not good for crop production. As a result the tribe's ability to farm has been negatively affected. It has also been established that the tribe has been resettled in an area which lacks employment opportunities. The tribe itself could not create employment opportunities as there were no enterprising farmers left among them due to insufficient rain and the poor condition of the soil. Business is not good as the majority of the people are poor. Statistics supplied by the Development Bank of Southern Africa indicate that in 1990 most of the people in Bophuthatswana were economically inactive due to lack of employment opportunities. Consequently, the tribe's means of making a living have diminished. One of the most important results obtained is that resettlement has made the tribe to lose hope in life and in their ability to be creative. Resettlement has made the people to live in despair and poverty. iv- SAM EVATTING Die studie kyk na die vraagstuk van hoe die Bakwena Ba Ga Molopyane geraak is deur hervestiging. Dit Ie ook kiem op die redes: vir die verwydering van die" Bakwena van Uitkyk in 1931 en van Doornkop in 1978. Aandag word gesken1. aan die ekonomiese posisie van die stam op die twee plase. Verder konsentreer die studie op die kwessie van kompensasie grondgebied, die negatiewe uitwerking op die vermoe van die stam om lewensvatbare Iandbou te beoefen, 'n tekort aan werksgeleenthede, die verlies aan 'n vaste inkomste en `n totale staat van moedeloosheid as gevolg van hervestiging. Intensiewe primere navorsing is gedoen. In Mei 1995 is onderhoude in Tsetse gevoer. In die onderhoude is dieselfde hoeveelheid en dieselfde soorte voorbereide vrae gestel waarop beide lang en kort antwoorde is vereis. In 1996 is onderhoude gevoer met 'n blanke kommersiele plaasboer van Ventersdorp asook met die voorsitter van die dorp se landbou-unie aangaande die ekonomiese aktiwiteite van die stam. Sekondere navorsing is gedoen deur 'n studie te maak van gepubliseerde sekondere bronne van die Randse Afrikaanse Universiteitsbiblioteek asook die biblioteek van die Raad vir Geesteswetenskaplike Navorsing in Pretoria. 'n Besoek is ook afgele aan die Staatsargief in Pretoria om primere argivale navorsing te doen. Amptelike dokumente van die Departement Bantoe Administrasie asook Naturelle-aangeleenthede is geraadpleeg - sake aangaande die koop en verkoop van grond deur swartes is deur die betrokke departemente hanteer. Die Staatsetnoloog is besoek om vas te stel wat die korrelasie was tussen informasie verkry en die stam se beweging. Registers van die Aktekantoor in Pretoria is ook geraadpleeg aangaande die oordrag van grond tussen die stam en ander belanghebbendes. 'n Behoefte het ontstaari om vas te stel hoe grond verkry is, deur wie en in wie se naam grond geregistreer is. Hierdie inligting is in die Aktekantoor verkry. Die Noordwes Provinsiale regering is besoek om data te bevestig aangaande die beweging van die stam vanaf Doornkop na Tsetse en kompensasie vir grond wat hulle prysgegee het te Doornkop. Primere navorsingsdokumente is geraadpleeg in die Kantoor vir Tradisionele Aangeleenthede. Die Aktekantoor in Mmabatho is ook besoek om vas te stel in wie se naam die plase Fairview en Ramatlabama, deel 27, geregistreer is. Die studie het vasgestel dat teen Oktober 1996, die plaas Fairview en deel 27 van Ramatlabama wat as kompensasie toegeken is, nie oorgedra en geregistreer is in die naam van die stam nie; tweedens, dat private eienaars aan wie deel 4 van Fairwiew in ruil vir deel 1(c) nr. 186 van die plaas Doornkop en deel 5 (van 3) van die plaas Doornkop in die Ventersdorpdistrik belowe is, ook nie gekompenseer is nie. : Een van die gevolge van hervestiging is dat die stam horn nou bevind in 'n droe gebied met 'n Iae reenvalsyfer. Die grond in Tsetse is ook nie geskik vir landbouproduksie nie. Gevolglik het dit 'n negatiewe uitwerking op die stam se vermoe om Iewensvatbare Iandbou te beoefen. Daar is ook bevind dat die stam hervestig is in 'n strook wat bitter min werksgeleenthede bled. Onvoldoende reen en swak landbougrond dra derhaiwe daartoe by dat Been ondernemende boere onder die stam oor is nie. Die stam is dus nie daartoe in staat om werksgeleenthede op eie houtjie te skep nie. Die gemiddelde armoede van die mense in die gebied dra ook nie by tot florerende ekonomiese bedrywighede nie. Statistiek van die Ontwikkelingsbank van Suider Afrika toon dat die meeste mense in Bophuthatswana in 1990 ekonomies onaktief was weens die tekort aan werksgeleenthede. Gevolglik is die stam se middele om `n bestaan te maak onder druk geplaas. Een van die belangrikste waarnemings is die stam se moedeloosheid met hul lewe oor die algemeen en met hul vi kreatiwiteitsvermoens in die besonder. Hervestigkng daartoe bygedra dat die mense in wanhoop en armoede lewe. vu CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENT SUMMARY ii SAMEVATTING iv LIST OF FIGURES xi CHAPTER 1 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Why the Topic is Important 2 1.3 Resettlement in the Literature 2 1.4 The Aim Of The Study 5 1.5 The Research Problem 6 1.6 Explanation of Concepts 6 1.6.1 Resettlement, Removals, Relocation 6 1.6.2 Black Spots 7 1.6.3 Bantustan: Homeland: National State 7 1.6.4 Betterment Planning 7 1.6.5 Group Areas 8 1.6.6 Closer Settlement 8 1.7 Methodology 8 viii PAGE CHAPTER 2 10 2. The Liberal and Revisionist Interpretation ; of the Resettlement Policy 10 2.1 The Liberal Interpretation 10 2.2 The Revisionist Interpretation 13 2.3 A General View of Resettlement 15 2.3.1 Resettlement policy in other countries 16 2.3.2 Resettlement policy within South Africa 20 CHAPTER 3: THE REMOVAL OF BAKWENA BA GA MOLOPYANA FROM UITKYK AND DOORNKOP AND THEIR ECONOMIC POSITION 33 3.1 Reasons for their Removal from Uitkyk and Doornkop 34 3.1.1 Uitkyk 34 3.1.2 Doornkop 35 3.2 The Economic Position of the Tribe 37 3.2.1 The Economic position of the Bakwena at Uitkyk 37 3.2.2 Doornkop 39 CHAPTER 4 4.1 The Effects of Resettlement on the Bakwena Ba Ga Molopyane 41 4.2 Problems Related to the Questions of Compensatory Land 41 4.2.1 Compensatory Land : Fairview and Weldon 43 4.2.2 Compensatory Land: Portion 4 of Fairview 48 iX PAGE 4.3 Lack of Enterprising Farmers 52 4.4 Lack of Employment Opportunities 58 4.5 Loss of Livelihood 60 4.6 A State of Despondency 62 Conclusion 62 CHAPTER 5: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE REMOVAL OF THE BAKWENA BA GA MOLOPYANE TO TSETSE 64 5.1 An Analysis of the Influence of Resettlement on the Bakwena Ba Ga Molopyane 64 5.2 Concluding Remarks 68 BIBLIOGRAPHY 70 ADDEMDUM A 76 INFORMANT NO.
Recommended publications
  • Ngaka Modiri Molema District

    Ngaka Modiri Molema District

    2 PROFILE: NGAKA MODIRI MOLEMA DISTRICT PROFILE: NGAKA MODIRI MOLEMA DISTRICT 3 CONTENT 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction: Brief Overview ........................................................................................... 7 2.1. Historical Perspective .............................................................................................. 7 2.3. Spatial Status .......................................................................................................... 9 3. Social Development Profile .......................................................................................... 10 3.1. Key Social Demographics ..................................................................................... 10 3.1.1. Population .......................................................................................................... 10 3.1.2. Gender, Age and Race ....................................................................................... 11 3.1.3. Households ........................................................................................................ 12 3.2. Health Profile ......................................................................................................... 12 3.3. COVID - 19............................................................................................................ 13 3.4. Poverty Dimensions .............................................................................................
  • Zeerust Sub District of Ramotshere Moiloa Magisterial District Main

    Zeerust Sub District of Ramotshere Moiloa Magisterial District Main

    # # !C # ### # !C^# #!.C# # !C # # # # # # # # # ^!C# # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # ## # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # ## # # # # !C# # # # #!C# # # ## ^ ## # !C # # # # # ^ # # # # # # #!C # # # !C # # #^ # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # # # !C# # !C # # # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # #!C# # # # # ## # # # # # # # ##!C # # ## # # # # # # # # # # !C### # # ## # ## # # # # # ## ## # ## !C## # # # # !C # # # #!C# # # # #^ # # # ## # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # # #!C # #!C #!C# # # # # # # ^# # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ### # ## # # !C # # #!C # # #!C # ## # !C## ## # # # # !C# # # ## # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # ## # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # #!C # # ## ## # # ## # ## # # ## ## # # #^!C # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # ## ## # # ## # # # # # !C # ## # # # #!C # ### # # # ##!C # # # # !C# #!C# ## # ## # # # !C # # ## # # ## # ## # ## ## # # ## !C# # # ## # ## # # ## #!C## # # # !C # !C# #!C # # ### # # # # # ## !C## !.### # ### # # # # ## !C # # # # # ## # #### # ## # # # # ## ## #^ # # # # # ^ # # !C# ## # # # # # # # !C## # ## # # # # # # # ## # # ##!C## ##!C# # !C# # # ## # !C### # # ^ # !C #### # # !C# ^#!C # # # !C # #!C ### ## ## #!C # ## # # # # # ## ## !C# ## # # # #!C # ## # ## ## # # # # # !C # # ^ # # ## ## ## # # # # !.!C## #!C## # ### # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # !C# # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # ## # # ^ # # # # # # # ## !C ## # ^ # # # !C# # # # ^ # # ## #!C # # ^
  • Delareyville Main Seat of Tswaing Magisterial District

    Delareyville Main Seat of Tswaing Magisterial District

    # # !C # # ### !C^ !.C# # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # !C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # #!C# # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # !C # !C # #^ # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # !C # !C # # # ## # # # ^ # # # # # # # # #!C# # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # ## #!C # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # !C # # # ## ## # ## # # # # !C # # # # ## # # !C# !C # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # #!C # ## # ##^ # !C #!C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # # !C# ## # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # ## # # !C # # #!C # # # # # # # !C# # # # # !C # # # # !C## # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # ## ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # #!C # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # ^ # # # ## # # # # # # # # # ## #!C # # # # # # # #!C # !C # # # # !C # #!C # # # # # # # # ## # # !C # ### # ## # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # ## # # # # # # !C # #### !C## # # # !C # # ## !C !C # # # # # # # # !.# # # # # # # ## # #!C# # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ### # #^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # ^ # !C# ## # # # # # # !C## # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # !C ## # # # # # ## !C# # !C# ### # !C### # # ^ # # # !C ### # # # !C# ##!C # !C # # # ^ !C ## # # #!C ## # # # # # # # # # # ## !C## ## # # ## # ## # # # # # #!C # ## # # # # # # # ## # # !C # ^ # # ## # # # # # !.!C # # # # # # # !C # # !C# # ### # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # ## !C
  • Episcopal. CHURCHPEOPLE for a Fi;EE SOUTHERN Afi;ICA -T" 339 Lafayette Street

    Episcopal. CHURCHPEOPLE for a Fi;EE SOUTHERN Afi;ICA -T" 339 Lafayette Street

    E~ EPISCOPAl. CHURCHPEOPLE for a fi;EE SOUTHERN AFi;ICA -t" 339 Lafayette Street. New York, N.Y. 10012·2725 vs (2, 2} 4n.0066 FAX: ( 212) 9 7 9 -l 0 13 A #166 15 September 1995 Transvaal Rural Action Committee April1995 The Transvaal Rural Action Comn.ittee- CTRAC1 was established in 1983 by Black Sash in response to the demand.~ ima.1. African conmunities for assistance in resist­ ing forced rem:>vals and incorporation into bantustans. Wcmen were the m:>st direct­ ly affected yet they were alm:>st always excluded from meetings Qr deliberations about strategy and struggle. TRAC is ncM a fully organized and articulate force in changing that m:>st ~ic element of South Africa - use of the land. Herewith are extracts fiXl1Il TRAC' s latest report: TRAC Mission Statement 't The Transvaal Rural Action Committee (TRAC) is a non-profit land NGO, working in rural parts ofthe northern provinces ofSouth Africa. Recognising the need to ri?dress past i~Vustices relating to land, we perform the following functioiiB: o providing information, advice anil technical · support to marginalised land-claiming anil landless groupings ~fmen and women, in their efforts to secure access to land through restitution and redistribution; o building strong, independent and democratically elected structures at a local and regional level in order to achieve the above; o lobbying, advocanng and campciigning for land reform and access to related resources; o ensuring that women's voices and interests are recognised and addressed. In all our work we maintain apeople-centred ' approach that strives towards a slistainable life on the land.
  • Internal Question Paper No.: 13 Date of Publication: 1 May 2020 Date of Reply: 1 June 2020

    Internal Question Paper No.: 13 Date of Publication: 1 May 2020 Date of Reply: 1 June 2020

    MINISTRY PUBLIC WORKS REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224 Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592 www.publicworks.gov.za NATIONAL ASSEMBLY WRITTEN REPLY QUESTION NUMBER: 746 [NW950E] INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO.: 13 DATE OF PUBLICATION: 1 MAY 2020 DATE OF REPLY: 1 JUNE 2020 746. Ms N W A Mazzone (DA) to ask the Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure: (a) What regulations did her Department rely on to bypass the normal adjudication process to appoint a certain company (details furnished) to do work on the Beit Bridge border post, (b) on what criteria was the decision made to appoint the specified service provider, (c) what were the specific skills and/or prior experience that identified the service provider as the preferred contractor, (d) what is the contractor’s track record with her Department, (e) is the contractor a preferred supplier, (f) was the contractor requested to scope and price the project before or after the appointment and (g) against what terms of reference were the scoping and pricing done? NW950E _______________________________________________________________________________ REPLY: The Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure: Background The Department of Public Works and Infrastructure (DPWI) has informed me that it was in the early stages in the process of appointing a service provider prior to the Covid-19 Pandemic, after the SANDF stated that their strategic borderline infrastructure is in a bad condition.
  • Download This PDF File

    Download This PDF File

    terblance 2.qxd 2005/12/09 10:31 Page 73 The vegetation of three localities of the threatened butterfly species Chrysoritis aureus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) R.F. TERBLANCHE, T.L. MORGENTHAL and S.S. CILLIERS Terblanche, R.F., T.L. Morgenthal and S.S. Cilliers. 2003. The vegetation of three local- ities of the threatened butterfly species Chrysoritis aureus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Koedoe 46(1): 73–90. Pretoria. ISSN 0075-6458. The vegetation and habitat characteristics of three localities of Chrysoritis aureus at the Alice Glockner Nature Reserve, Suikerbosrand Nature Reserve and Malanskraal farm near Heidelberg in South Africa, were compared. A numerical classification technique, TWINSPAN, was used and refined by using Braun Blanquet procedures to classify the vegetation at the different localities. A DCA ordination was applied to confirm the results of the classification. Although the general vegetation structure at the three habi- tats of Chrysoritis aureus were found to be similar, marked differences in the floristic composition were evidenced. A different sub-community, compared to the vegetation at Suikerbosrand and Alice Glockner Nature Reserve, was recorded at the Malanskraal habitat of Chrysoritis aureus. These differences in floristic composition, but with simi- larities in vegetation structure, indicate the possible importance of fire for the ultimate survival of these butterflies in the Rocky Highveld Grassland. The host plant of Chrysoritis aureus, Clutia pulchella, collected at Malanskraal differed markedly and consistently in their morphology, compared to the individuals from the habitats at Suikerbosrand and Alice Glockner Nature Reserve. These differences in the floristic composition of one of the habitats compared to the others, raise research questions con- cerning the butterfly metapopulation structure, since the subpopulations seem to be adapted to slightly different habitat conditions.
  • Paper Number: 3552 Structural Development of the Potchefstroom Thrust and Fault System, Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa Matt Terracin1, Musa S

    Paper Number: 3552 Structural Development of the Potchefstroom Thrust and Fault System, Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa Matt Terracin1, Musa S

    Paper Number: 3552 Structural Development of the Potchefstroom Thrust and Fault System, Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa Matt Terracin1, Musa S. D. Manzi1, Kim A. A. Hein1 1 University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg, PBag 3, 1 Empire Street, WITS 2050, Gauteng Email [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Although the Witwatersrand Basin (Wits) has been researched for well over 100 years, very little is known about the subsurface structures within the basin outside of the mining areas [1]. This project examines a set of 2D reflection seismic data acquired by Anglo Gold Ashanti Ltd. as part of the exploration of the Wits from 1986 to 1993. This project focuses on the area around the city of Potchefstroom Known as the Potchefstroom Gap. Within this area the gold bearing reefs of the Witwatersrand and Ventersdorp supergroups are poorly developed or inconsistently present along strike. Truter (1936) proposed a westerly verging thrust/fault based on stratigraphic relationships to account for the loss of ground [2]. However, after 80 years of exploration no cohesive model has been developed for the sporadic presence of well mineralized reefs encountered during drilling. We herein present the first full structural and developmental model for this region that integrates surface, subsurface and drilling data. This new model revises previous structural interpretations by demonstrating that the Potchefstroom thrust/fault does not exist and illustrates the gap is the result of the complex interaction between three major Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic structures (Fig 1), consisting of 2 south-easterly verging thrusts, and a normal fault downthrown to the south-east.
  • An Analysis of Alcohol and Cigarette Prices in Maseru, Gaborone, and Neighboring South African Towns

    An Analysis of Alcohol and Cigarette Prices in Maseru, Gaborone, and Neighboring South African Towns

    : TRADE A GLOBAL REVIEW OF COUNTRY EXPERIENCES BOTSWANA, LESOTHO, AND SOUTH AFRICA: AN ANALYSIS OF ALCOHOL AND CIGARETTE PRICES IN MASERU, GABORONE, AND NEIGHBORING SOUTH AFRICAN TOWNS TECHNICAL REPORT OF THE WORLD BANK GROUP GLOBAL TOBACCO CONTROL PROGRAM. CONFRONTING EDITOR: SHEILA DUTTA ILLICIT TOBACCO BOTSWANA, LESOTHO, AND SOUTH AFRICA 19 BOTSWANA, LESOTHO, AND SOUTH AFRICA An Analysis of Alcohol and Cigarette Prices in Maseru, Gaborone, and Neighboring South African Towns Kirsten van der Zee and Corné van Walbeek1 Chapter Summary The government of Lesotho plans to implement a levy on tobacco and alcohol products. The proposed measure is similar to levies that have been implemented in Botswana in recent years. A concern is the possibility that Lesotho’s new levy may stimulate a significant increase in bootlegging between Lesotho and South Africa. This chapter investigates the presence and possibility of bootlegging between South Africa and Botswana, and South Africa and Lesotho, by describing the differences in cigarette and alcohol prices between Gaborone, Botswana, and the nearby South African towns of Mafikeng and Zeerust, as well as between Maseru, Lesotho, and nearby Ladybrand, South Africa. 1 Economics of Tobacco Control Project, University of Cape Town, South Africa. 551 551 Confronting Illicit Tobacco Trade: A Global Review of Country Experiences An analysis of comparative cigarette price data indicated the following: Gaborone and Mafikeng/Zeerust. Overall, average cigarette prices are significantly higher in Gaborone than in nearby South African towns. The cheapest pack price found in Gaborone was nearly five times the cheapest price identified in South Africa. Maseru and Ladybrand. Cigarette prices differ between Maseru and Ladybrand, but much less than between Gaborone and Mafikeng/Zeerust.
  • Lichtenburg 2

    Lichtenburg 2

    LICHTENBURG 2 North West Province Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Scoping Report August 2018 Social Impact Assessment – Scoping Report August 2018 Lichtenburg 2 North West Province Prepared for: ABO Wind Lichtenburg 2 PV (Pty) Ltd Lichtenburg 2 North West Province August 2018 PROJECT DETAILS Title : Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Scoping Report for the Lichtenburg 2 PV Facility near Lichtenburg, in the North West Province Authors : Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd Sarah Watson Client : ABO Wind Lichtenburg 2 PV (Pty) Ltd Report Revision : Revision 1 Date : August 2018 When used as a reference this report should be cited as: Savannah Environmental (2018). Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Scoping Report for the Lichtenburg 2 PV Facility near Lichtenburg, in the North West Province. COPYRIGHT RESERVED This technical report has been produced for ABO Wind Lichtenburg 2 PV (Pty) Ltd. The intellectual property contained in this report remains vested in Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd. No part of the report may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd or ABO Wind Lichtenburg 2 PV (Pty) Ltd. Project Details Page i Lichtenburg 2 North West Province August 2018 SPECIALIST DECLARATION OF INTEREST I, Sarah Watson, declare that – » I act as the independent specialist in this application. » I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant. » I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work. » I have expertise in conducting the specialist report relevant to this application, including knowledge of the Act, Regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity.
  • Idp 2017/2022

    Idp 2017/2022

    INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 Table of Content Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 04 - 05 Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................. 06 - 16 Introduction .................................................................................................... 06 - 07 Alighnment of IDP/Budget/PMS ........................................................................ 08 - 09 IDP/Budget and PMS Process Plan .................................................................... 10 - 11 Comprehensive Strategic Alignment ......................................................................... 11 National and Provincial Imperatives ................................................................... 11 - 15 Local Municipalities ................................................................................................. 15 Management of IDP Process .................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2 ............................................................................................................. 17 - 37 Demographic Analysis ......................................................................................... 19 - 21 VTSD Demographics .................................................................................................. 21 Economic Analysis ..............................................................................................
  • MAHLANGU MAFIKA : Applicant And

    MAHLANGU MAFIKA : Applicant And

    CA 137/2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between:- MAHLANGU MAFIKA : Applicant and THE STATE : Respondent APPLICATION MAFIKENG HENDRICKS AJ DATE OF HEARING :22 September 2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT :25 September 2003 COUNSEL FOR APPLICANT :Adv. E.M. Mmolawa COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :Adv. M.M. Sono HENDRICKS AJ: This is an appeal against the refusal of bail by the Magistrate in the Regional Court, Mmabatho. The Appellant, who was accused no. 7 - in the court a quo , applied unsuccessfully to be released on bail pending his trial. The initial bail application was heard on the 05th March 2003 and new evidence was led on 10th April 2003, but it was only on the 12th September 2003 (5 months later) that this appeal appeared for the first time before this court. It is indeed regrettable that such a long delay occurred in this matter seeing that bail appeals are urgent and it should be attended to as soon as it is practically possible to do so. The appellant was together with his co-accused arrested at a farm near Ramatlabama, near the border with neighbouring Botswana. It appears from the uncontested evidence that the Appellant happened to be in a Nissan Bakkie together with one of his co-accused, accused no. 4, in the court a quo . Apparently Accused No. 4 was asked by the Appellant to bring building materials from Pretoria to Itsoseng where the Appellant was attending to a building project at the Itsoseng Magistrate Court. According to the Appellant, Accused No.
  • 2021 BROCHURE the LONG LOOK the Pioneer Way of Doing Business

    2021 BROCHURE the LONG LOOK the Pioneer Way of Doing Business

    2021 BROCHURE THE LONG LOOK The Pioneer way of doing business We are an international company with a unique combination of cultures, languages and experiences. Our technologies and business environment have changed dramatically since Henry A. Wallace first founded the Hi-Bred Corn Company in 1926. This Long Look business philosophy – our attitude toward research, production and marketing, and the worldwide network of Pioneer employees – will always remain true to the four simple statements which have guided us since our early years: We strive to produce the best products in the market. We deal honestly and fairly with our employees, sales representatives, business associates, customers and stockholders. We aggressively market our products without misrepresentation. We provide helpful management information to assist customers in making optimum profits from our products. MADE TO GROW™ Farming is becoming increasingly more complex and the stakes ever higher. Managing a farm is one of the most challenging and critical businesses on earth. Each day, farmers have to make decisions and take risks that impact their immediate and future profitability and growth. For those who want to collaborate to push as hard as they can, we are strivers too. Drawing on our deep heritage of innovation and breadth of farming knowledge, we spark radical and transformative new thinking. And we bring everything you need — the high performing seed, the advanced technology and business services — to make these ideas reality. We are hungry for your success and ours. With us, you will be equipped to ride the wave of changing trends and extract all possible value from your farm — to grow now and for the future.