DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Grass Ecotypes for Potential Use in Reseeding of Pastoral Fields in the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands of Kenya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EVALUATION OF GRASS ECOTYPES FOR POTENTIAL USE IN RESEEDING OF PASTORAL FIELDS IN THE ARID AND SEMI-ARID LANDS OF KENYA By Everlyne CheptArus KirwA, B.SC., M.Sc. (UoN) A80/83321/2012 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE AND CROP PROTECTION FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI ©2019 DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my lovely husband Dr. Muge and children Peter, Chantal and Leon for their relentless support and encouragement during the preparation. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge the funding support from the East African Agricultural productivity programme (EAAPP) for the scholarship and, Arid and Semi-Arid Lands Agricultural productivity research programme (ASAL-APRP) and National Council for Science and Technology for partially supporting my research work. I sincerely appreciate the input of my supervisors Prof. Eliud Kahiu Ngugi, Prof. George N. Chemining’wa and Dr. William Ngoyawu Mnene who greatly supported me in the development of this thesis. I would also like to sincerely appreciate posthumously the input of the late Prof. Kiarie Njoroge who guided me through proposal development, research implementation and partly writing of my thesis. Thanks are also due to the Director General, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization and the staff of KALRO Headquarters, Kiboko, Buchuma, Mtwapa and Biotechnology Centre Kabete for logistical support. Finally to my family, relatives and friends, thanks all for the patience and your prayers. May God almighty bless you all. iii ACRONYMS AEZ Agro-ecological Zone AMMI Additive Main and Multiplicative Interaction ANOVA Analysis of variance ASALs Arid and Semi-Arid Lands CBFSB Community Based Range Forage Seed Bulking FAO Food and Agriculture Organization ICPALD IGAD Centre for Pastoral Areas and Livestock Development ILRI International Livestock Research Institute KALRO Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization KBK Kiboko KLF Kilifi MGD Magadi PVS Participatory Variety Selection SRAP Sequence Related Amplified Polymorphism TVT Taita Taveta USDA United States Department of Agriculture iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ......................................................................................................................... i DEDICATION............................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................................ iii ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................xiii LIST OF PLATES .................................................................................................................... xv ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ xvi CHAPTER ONE ......................................................................................................................... 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Importance of ASALs in livestock production ................................................................. 1 1.2 Problem Statement .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Justification of the study .................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Main Objective ................................................................................................................ 8 1.4.1. Specific Objectives .................................................................................................. 8 1.4.2. Hypotheses............................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER TWO ........................................................................................................................ 9 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 9 2.1. Importance of grass forage in livestock production .......................................................... 9 2.2. Description of Eragrostis superba Peyr ........................................................................... 9 2.3. Description of Cenchrus ciliaris L. ................................................................................ 12 2.4. Morphological characterization of forage grass.............................................................. 15 2.4.1 Principal component analysis ................................................................................. 16 2.4.2 Cluster analysis ...................................................................................................... 17 2.5. Nutritional value of grasses ........................................................................................... 18 2.6. Seasonal variation in grass forage availability................................................................ 19 2.7. Participatory selection of varieties ................................................................................. 20 2.8. Molecular characterization of grasses ............................................................................ 21 2.9. Agro-ecological zones ................................................................................................... 26 v CHAPTER THREE .................................................................................................................. 29 CHARACTERIZATION OF ECOTYPES OF CENCHRUS CILIARIS L. AND ERAGROSTIS SUPERBA PEYR USING MORPHOLOGICAL AND NUTRITIVE VALUE TRAITS ............ 29 3.1. Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.2. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 30 3.3. Materials and Methods .................................................................................................. 33 3.3.1. Collection sites ....................................................................................................... 33 3.3.2. Study sites .............................................................................................................. 36 3.3.3. Field conditions and layout .................................................................................... 37 3.3.4. Data collection ....................................................................................................... 38 3.3.4. Data analysis .......................................................................................................... 42 3.4. Results .......................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.1. Germination capacity of Cenchrus ciliaris.............................................................. 43 3.4.2. Phenotypic characterization of Cenchrus ciliaris ecotypes ..................................... 45 3.4.3. Variation in flowering phenology of Cenchrus ciliaris between cuts ...................... 51 3.4.4. Variation in flowering phenology between sites of collections of Cenchrus ciliaris 52 3.4.5. Variation in flowering phenology between ecotypes of Cenchrus ciliaris ............... 53 3.4.6. Correlation analysis between traits for Cenchrus ciliaris ........................................ 55 3.4.7. Analysis of nutritive value components among sites of origin for Cenchrus ciliaris ecotypes ................................................................................................................. 57 3.4.8. Comparison of nutritive value components among ecotypes of Cenchrus ciliaris ... 57 3.4.9. Phenotypic characterization of Eragrostis superba ecotypes................................... 59 3.4.10. Correlation analysis between traits for Eragrostis superba ..................................... 63 3.4.11. Analysis of nutritive value components between sites of origin for Eragrostis superba ecotypes ................................................................................................................. 65 3.4.12. Comparison of nutritive value components among Eragrostis superba ecotypes .... 65 3.5. Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 67 3.6. Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 79 CHAPTER FOUR .................................................................................................................... 80 vi CHARACTERIZATION OF ECOTYPES OF CENCHRUS CILIARIS L. AND ERAGROSTIS SUPERBA PEYR. USING SEQUENCE RELATED AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHISM (SRAP) ................................................................................................................................................. 80 4.1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Poaceae Phytoliths from the Niassa Rift, Mozambique

    Poaceae Phytoliths from the Niassa Rift, Mozambique

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222149229 Poaceae phytoliths from the Niassa Rift, Mozambique Article in Journal of Archaeological Science · August 2010 DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.03.001 CITATIONS READS 44 409 9 authors, including: Fernando Astudillo Mary Barkworth Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) Utah State University 4 PUBLICATIONS 45 CITATIONS 81 PUBLICATIONS 902 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Tim Aaron Bennett Chris Esselmont 8 PUBLICATIONS 242 CITATIONS The University of Calgary 6 PUBLICATIONS 161 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Stipeae (no longer a major focus) View project Grasses in North America View project All content following this page was uploaded by Rahab N Kinyanjui on 19 March 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Journal of Archaeological Science 37 (2010) 1953e1967 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Poaceae phytoliths from the Niassa Rift, Mozambique Julio Mercader a,*, Fernando Astudillo a, Mary Barkworth b, Tim Bennett a, Chris Esselmont c, Rahab Kinyanjui d, Dyan Laskin Grossman a, Steven Simpson a, Dale Walde a a Department of Archaeology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada b Intermountain Herbarium, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UH 84322-5305, USA c Environics Research Group, 999 8th Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2R 1J5, Canada d National Museum of Kenya, Department of Earth Sciences, Palynology and Paleobotany Section, P.O.
  • Valorisation Des Activités Biologiques De Certaines Espèces Végétales Sahariennes Nord-Africaines Ionut-Florin Palici

    Valorisation Des Activités Biologiques De Certaines Espèces Végétales Sahariennes Nord-Africaines Ionut-Florin Palici

    Valorisation des activités biologiques de certaines espèces végétales sahariennes nord-africaines Ionut-Florin Palici To cite this version: Ionut-Florin Palici. Valorisation des activités biologiques de certaines espèces végétales sahariennes nord-africaines. Biologie végétale. Université de Bordeaux, 2016. Français. NNT : 2016BORD0321. tel-01515319 HAL Id: tel-01515319 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01515319 Submitted on 27 Apr 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ecole Doctorale Sciences de l’Environnement Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences Agronomiques, Biotechnologies Agro- alimentaires Présentée par Ionut-Florin Palici Docteur en Pharmacie, Assistant en Botanique Université de Médecine & de Pharmacie de Timisoara, Roumanie Titre Valorisation des Activités biologiques de certaines espèces végétales sahariennes Nord-africaines Soutenue publiquement le 30 Novembre 2016, devant le jury : Pierre Waffo-Téguo, Pr. Université de Bordeaux; Président Bernard Amiaud, Pr. Université de Lorraine; Rapporteur Jean-Christophe Clément, Pr. Université Savoie Mont-Blanc; Rapporteur Blaise Touzard, M. de Conf. ; HDR, Université de Bordeaux; Directeur Mohamed Chaieb, Prof., Université de Sfax, Tunisie; Membre Année Universitaire : 2015-2016 Résumé La région sahariennne est une des zones les plus défavorables à la croissance et développement des espèces animales.
  • Plant Associations and Descriptions for American Memorial Park, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Saipan

    Plant Associations and Descriptions for American Memorial Park, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Saipan

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Inventory Project American Memorial Park Natural Resource Report NPS/PACN/NRR—2013/744 ON THE COVER Coastal shoreline at American Memorial Park Photograph by: David Benitez Vegetation Inventory Project American Memorial Park Natural Resource Report NPS/PACN/NRR—2013/744 Dan Cogan1, Gwen Kittel2, Meagan Selvig3, Alison Ainsworth4, David Benitez5 1Cogan Technology, Inc. 21 Valley Road Galena, IL 61036 2NatureServe 2108 55th Street, Suite 220 Boulder, CO 80301 3Hawaii-Pacific Islands Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (HPI-CESU) University of Hawaii at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 4National Park Service Pacific Island Network – Inventory and Monitoring PO Box 52 Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 5National Park Service Hawaii Volcanoes National Park – Resources Management PO Box 52 Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 December 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
  • Urochloa Arrecta & U. Mutica

    Urochloa Arrecta & U. Mutica

    Tropical Forages Urochloa arrecta & U. mutica Scientific name Urochloa arrecta (Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz) Morrone & Zuloaga Urochloa mutica (Forssk.) T.Q. Nguyen Tanner grass, U. arrecta, similar in many respects to U. mutica U. arrecta seeds Synonyms U. arrecta: Basionym: Panicum arrectum Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz; Brachiaria arrecta (Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz) Stent; Brachiaria latifolia Stapf; Brachiaria radicans Napper U. mutica: Basionym: Panicum muticum Forssk.; Brachiaria mutica (Forssk.) Stapf; Panicum barbinode Trin.; Panicum purpurascens Raddi Family/tribe Line illustration of Urochloa arrecta from U. mutica, a short day plant flowering Family: Poaceae (alt. Gramineae) subfamily: Pretoria National Herbarium most prolifically from latitude 10–20º Panicoideae tribe: Paniceae subtribe: Melinidinae. Morphological description Urochloa arrecta: Perennial, culms rambling, 30–130 cm long, rooting from lower nodes; culm nodes glabrous or pubescent. Ligule a fringe of hairs. Leaf-blades 5–25 cm long, 5–15 mm wide. Inflorescence composed of racemes. Racemes 4–15, borne along a central axis, U. mutica in shallow water, Nakai unilateral, 1–10 cm long. Central inflorescence axis 5– Plateau, Laos U. mutica densely bearded culm node; 25 cm long; rachis broadly winged, 0.5–1.5 mm wide, hairy leaf sheath scabrous on margins, glabrous on margins. Spikelet packing adaxial, regular, 2 -rowed. Spikelets solitary; fertile spikelet sessile; fertile floret without rhachilla extension; spikelets elliptic, dorsally compressed, compressed slightly, acute, 3–4.3 mm long, falling entire; rhachilla internodes brief up to lowest fertile floret. Glumes dissimilar, reaching apex of florets, thinner than fertile lemma; lower glume ovate, ⅓ - ½ length of spikelet, membranous, without keels, 3–5- U.
  • Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative Key and Descriptions

    Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative Key and Descriptions

    Hagenbuch, K.W. and D.E. Lemke. 2015. Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative key and descriptions. Phytoneuron 2015-4: 1–93. Published 7 January 2015. ISSN 2153 733X GRASSES OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY: VEGETATIVE KEY AND DESCRIPTIONS KARL W. HAGENBUCH Department of Biological Sciences San Antonio College 1300 San Pedro Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212-4299 [email protected] DAVID E. LEMKE Department of Biology Texas State University 601 University Drive San Marcos, Texas 78666-4684 [email protected] ABSTRACT A key and a set of descriptions, based solely on vegetative characteristics, is provided for the identification of 66 genera and 160 grass species, both native and naturalized, of the Texas Hill Country. The principal characters used (features of longevity, growth form, roots, rhizomes and stolons, culms, leaf sheaths, collars, auricles, ligules, leaf blades, vernation, vestiture, and habitat) are discussed and illustrated. This treatment should prove useful at times when reproductive material is not available. Because of its size and variation in environmental conditions, Texas provides habitat for well over 700 species of grasses (Shaw 2012). For identification purposes, the works of Correll and Johnston (1970); Gould (1975) and, more recently, Shaw (2012) treat Texas grasses in their entirety. In addition to these comprehensive works, regional taxonomic treatments have been done for the grasses of the Cross Timbers and Prairies (Hignight et al. 1988), the South Texas Brush Country (Lonard 1993; Everitt et al. 2011), the Gulf Prairies and Marshes (Hatch et al. 1999), and the Trans-Pecos (Powell 1994) natural regions. In these, as well as in numerous other manuals and keys, accurate identification of grass species depends on the availability of reproductive material.
  • Management Effects on Herbage Responses, Size of Nutrient Pools, and Litter Dynamics in Grazed ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass (Cynodon Spp.) Pastures

    Management Effects on Herbage Responses, Size of Nutrient Pools, and Litter Dynamics in Grazed ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass (Cynodon Spp.) Pastures

    MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON HERBAGE RESPONSES, SIZE OF NUTRIENT POOLS, AND LITTER DYNAMICS IN GRAZED ‘TIFTON 85’ BERMUDAGRASS (CYNODON SPP.) PASTURES By KESI LIU A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 © 2009 Kesi Liu 2 To my parents and wife, for all their support and encouragement through the year. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to begin by giving my special thanks to Dr. Lynn E. Sollenberger, my supervisory committee chair. His guidance throughout the graduate program has been invaluable and greatly appreciated. Thanks also go to the other members of the supervisory committee, Dr. Kenneth S. Boote, Dr. Donald A. Graetz, Dr. Yoana C. Newman, and Dr. João M.B. Vendramini, for their willingness to serve on the committee, their input and direction during the program, and for reviewing the dissertation. Special thanks go to those who helped during field and laboratory activities. This includes fellow graduate students Sindy Interrante, Renée White, and Miguel Castillo for their great support. Thanks go to the Beef Research Unit staff, Sid Jones and Dwight Thomas, for their help and support at the experimental station. In the Forage Evaluation Support Laboratory, Richard Fethiere and his crew gave the support needed for the forage analyses. Thanks are also due to Dr. Maria Silveira and Dr. Adegbola T. Adesogan and their lab staff for their help and support with laboratory sample preparation and analysis. For the friendship and company during my life in Gainesville, I would like to thank Ming Liu, Zhiwei Chen, and Qien Yang.
  • Nutritional Value, Mineral Composition, Secondary Metabolites, and Antioxidant Activity of Some Wild Geophyte Sedges and Grasses

    Nutritional Value, Mineral Composition, Secondary Metabolites, and Antioxidant Activity of Some Wild Geophyte Sedges and Grasses

    plants Article Nutritional Value, Mineral Composition, Secondary Metabolites, and Antioxidant Activity of Some Wild Geophyte Sedges and Grasses Saud L. Al-Rowaily 1, Ahmed M. Abd-ElGawad 1,2,* , Suliman M. Alghanem 3, Wafa’a A. Al-Taisan 4 and Yasser A. El-Amier 2 1 Plant Production Department, College of Food & Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt; [email protected] 3 Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Tabuk University, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 4 Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +20-1003438980 or +966-562680864 Received: 11 November 2019; Accepted: 2 December 2019; Published: 4 December 2019 Abstract: Geophytes are plants with underground storage organs including bulbs, corms, tubers, and rhizomes, often physiologically active and able to survive during harsh environmental conditions. This study is conducted to assess the nutritive value, mineral composition, bioactive metabolites, and antioxidant activity of five wild geophytes (Cyperus capitatus, C. conglomeratus, Elymus farctus, Lasiurus scindicus, and Panicum turgidum) collected from the Nile Delta coast and inland desert. The proximate composition including dry matter, moisture content, ash content, fiber, fat, protein, sucrose, and glucose were determined. Also, total carbohydrates, total digestible nutrients (TDN), and nutritive values were calculated. Macro- and micro-minerals were also determined in the studied geophytes.
  • TAXONOMIC STUDIES and GENERIC DELIMITATION in the GRASS SUBTRIBE Sorghinae

    TAXONOMIC STUDIES and GENERIC DELIMITATION in the GRASS SUBTRIBE Sorghinae

    TAXONOMIC STUDIES AND GENERIC DELIMITATION IN THE GRASS SUBTRIBE Sorghinae. Moffat Pinkie Setshogo A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh March 1997 Dedicated to the memory of my father, Tonkana, and to my mother, Kerileng. Acknowledgements. This work was carried out under the supervision of Dr. P.M. Smith. I wish to express my sincere gratitude to him for the advice and assistance throughout the progress of the study. I also want to thank Dr. C.E. Jeffree who has been very supportive and proof read a substantial portion of the thesis. I am indebted to the University of Botswana for the financial support and for offering me a study leave to enable me to carry out this study. The work was carried out at the Department of Botany, University of Edinburgh, as well as at the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. I would like to extend my thanks to the authorities of both institutions, and their staff, who offered help in many ways. My collection of living material was cared for by Messrs Billy Adams and Bob Astles. I wish to thank them for their help. My thanks also go to members of the photographic unit of ICMB, particularly John Anthony, Dave Haswell and Frank Johnston, for their help. Mr. John Findlay (Botany Department) gave me guidance with my SEM work, for which I am grateful. I am indebted to the Directors of various herbaria who loaned me specimens. Helen Hoy and Marisa Main were in charge of the Edinburgh side of these loans.
  • FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT 3 Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation September 2014

    FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT 3 Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation September 2014

    FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT 3 Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation September 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.0 RESOURCE REPORT 3 – FISH, WILDLIFE, AND VEGETATION .............................................. 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 FISHERY RESOURCES ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Fisheries Habitat Classification .......................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 Existing Fishery Resources ................................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.3 Fisheries of Special Concern ............................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.4 Fisheries Impacts and Mitigation ........................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.4.1 Waterbody Construction Methods .................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.4.2 Vegetation Clearing ........................................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.4.3 Hydrostatic Test Water ................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.4.4 Spill Prevention Control .................................................................................................
  • Smuts Finger Grass (Digitaria Eriantha Cv Irene) Root Growth Assessment and Some Physicochemical Characteristics on Coal Mined Land Compacted Soil

    Smuts Finger Grass (Digitaria Eriantha Cv Irene) Root Growth Assessment and Some Physicochemical Characteristics on Coal Mined Land Compacted Soil

    JASEM ISSN 1119-8362 Full-text Available Online at J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jasem Vol. 22 (8) 1293 –1296 August 2018 All rights reserved http://ww.bioline.org.br/ja Smuts Finger Grass (Digitaria Eriantha Cv Irene) Root Growth Assessment and Some Physicochemical Characteristics on Coal Mined Land Compacted Soil *MOSEBI, PE; TRUTER, WF; MADAKADZE, IC Department of Plant Production and Soil Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The coal mine soil layers contained high values of bulk density of 1.80gcm -3 and 1.90gcm -3 at depths of 0-20 and 20-40 cm respectively, low contents of organic matter, soil pH and soil nutrients concentration. A field trial was conducted to investigate root growth responses of Smuts Finger grass (Digitaria eriantha cv Irene) to compacted mine soil layers. It was revealed that the greatest root masses were noted in the upper horizons with progressively significantly less in the deeper horizons. Roots of this species penetrated compacted soil layers and decreased soil bulk density. The highest soil pH values were found in the upper layers with greatest root biomass. Soil nutrients (P, Mg, Ca, Na and K) status was also better in the upper layers. Smuts Finger grass could be used as an alternative method for rehabilitation of compacted mine soil layers. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v22i8.24 Copyright: Copyright © 2018 Mosebi et al . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCL), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Global Relationships Between Plant Functional Traits and Environment in Grasslands

    Global Relationships Between Plant Functional Traits and Environment in Grasslands

    GLOBAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS AND ENVIRONMENT IN GRASSLANDS EMMA JARDINE A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Sheffield Department of Animal and Plant Sciences Submission Date July 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all I am enormously thankful to Colin Osborne and Gavin Thomas for giving me the opportunity to undertake the research presented in this thesis. I really appreciate all their invaluable support, guidance and advice. They have helped me to grow in knowledge, skills and confidence and for this I am extremely grateful. I would like to thank the students and post docs in both the Osborne and Christin lab groups for their help, presentations and cake baking. In particular Marjorie Lundgren for teaching me to use the Licor, for insightful discussions and general support. Also Kimberly Simpson for all her firey contributions and Ruth Wade for her moral support and employment. Thanks goes to Dave Simpson, Maria Varontsova and Martin Xanthos for allowing me to work in the herbarium at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, for letting me destructively harvest from the specimens and taking me on a worldwide tour of grasses. I would also like to thank Caroline Lehman for her map, her useful comments and advice and also Elisabeth Forrestel and Gareth Hempson for their contributions. I would like to thank Brad Ripley for all of his help and time whilst I was in South Africa. Karmi Du Plessis and her family and Lavinia Perumal for their South African friendliness, warmth and generosity and also Sean Devonport for sharing all the much needed teas and dub.
  • Grasses of Namibia Contact

    Grasses of Namibia Contact

    Checklist of grasses in Namibia Esmerialda S. Klaassen & Patricia Craven For any enquiries about the grasses of Namibia contact: National Botanical Research Institute Private Bag 13184 Windhoek Namibia Tel. (264) 61 202 2023 Fax: (264) 61 258153 E-mail: [email protected] Guidelines for using the checklist Cymbopogon excavatus (Hochst.) Stapf ex Burtt Davy N 9900720 Synonyms: Andropogon excavatus Hochst. 47 Common names: Breëblaarterpentyngras A; Broad-leaved turpentine grass E; Breitblättriges Pfeffergras G; dukwa, heng’ge, kamakama (-si) J Life form: perennial Abundance: uncommon to locally common Habitat: various Distribution: southern Africa Notes: said to smell of turpentine hence common name E2 Uses: used as a thatching grass E3 Cited specimen: Giess 3152 Reference: 37; 47 Botanical Name: The grasses are arranged in alphabetical or- Rukwangali R der according to the currently accepted botanical names. This Shishambyu Sh publication updates the list in Craven (1999). Silozi L Thimbukushu T Status: The following icons indicate the present known status of the grass in Namibia: Life form: This indicates if the plant is generally an annual or G Endemic—occurs only within the political boundaries of perennial and in certain cases whether the plant occurs in water Namibia. as a hydrophyte. = Near endemic—occurs in Namibia and immediate sur- rounding areas in neighbouring countries. Abundance: The frequency of occurrence according to her- N Endemic to southern Africa—occurs more widely within barium holdings of specimens at WIND and PRE is indicated political boundaries of southern Africa. here. 7 Naturalised—not indigenous, but growing naturally. < Cultivated. Habitat: The general environment in which the grasses are % Escapee—a grass that is not indigenous to Namibia and found, is indicated here according to Namibian records.