DOCSLIB.ORG

FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT 3 Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation September 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT 3 Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation September 2014 FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT 3 Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation September 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.0 RESOURCE REPORT 3 – FISH, WILDLIFE, AND VEGETATION .............................................. 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 FISHERY RESOURCES ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Fisheries Habitat Classification .......................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 Existing Fishery Resources ................................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.3 Fisheries of Special Concern ............................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.4 Fisheries Impacts and Mitigation ........................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.4.1 Waterbody Construction Methods .................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.4.2 Vegetation Clearing ........................................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.4.3 Hydrostatic Test Water ................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.4.4 Spill Prevention Control .................................................................................................. 3-4 3.3 VEGETATION ................................................................................................................................ 3-5 3.3.1 Ecoregions ......................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3.2 Existing Vegetation ............................................................................................................ 3-5 3.3.3 Open Land .......................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3.3.1 Upland Open Land ......................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3.3.2 Herbaceous and Scrub-Shrub Wetlands ....................................................................... 3-7 3.3.4 Agricultural ......................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.3.5 Forest and Woodlands ....................................................................................................... 3-8 3.3.5.1 Pine Plantation ............................................................................................................... 3-8 3.3.5.2 Upland Forest ................................................................................................................. 3-8 3.3.5.3 Wetland Forest ............................................................................................................... 3-9 3.3.6 Industrial, Commercial, and Residential Uses ................................................................... 3-9 3.3.7 Non-Native/Invasive Species ............................................................................................. 3-9 3.3.8 Vegetation Impacts and Mitigation ................................................................................... 3-10 3.4 WILDLIFE ................................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.4.1 Existing Resources .......................................................................................................... 3-12 3.4.2 Wildlife Impacts and Mitigation ......................................................................................... 3-12 3.4.3 Significant or Sensitive Wildlife Habitat ............................................................................ 3-14 3.4.4 Migratory Birds ................................................................................................................. 3-14 3.5 ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND SPECIAL CONCERN SPECIES .................................................... 3-15 3.5.1 Protected Aquatic and Marine Species ............................................................................ 3-16 3.5.2 Protected Plant Species ................................................................................................... 3-16 3.5.2.1 Survey Methodology for All Plant Species ................................................................... 3-16 3.5.3 Impacts and Mitigation ..................................................................................................... 3-19 Resource Report 3 – Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation ii FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT 3.5.3.1 Federally Listed Wildlife Species ................................................................................. 3-19 3.5.3.2 State-Listed Wildlife Species ........................................................................................ 3-36 3.6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 3-44 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.2-1 Fish Species with the Potential to Occur along the FSC Project Route Table 3.3-1 Acres of Vegetation Affected by the Proposed FSC Project Table 3.3-2 Non-native/Invasive Plant Species with the Potential to Occur along the FSC Project Route Table 3.4-1 Wildlife Species with the Potential to Occur along the FSC Project Route Table 3.4-2 USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern Table 3.5-1 Federally and State-Listed Plant Species Potentially Occurring in Osceola, Okeechobee, Polk, Martin, and St. Lucie Counties, Florida with the Potential to Occur along the FSC Project Route Table 3.5-2 Federally and State-Listed Wildlife Species Known to Occur in Osceola, Okeechobee, Polk, Martin, and St. Lucie Counties, Florida with the Potential to Occur along the FSC Project Route LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 3A Comprehensive Listed Species Survey Protocols Appendix 3B Agency Correspondence Appendix 3C Southeast Market Pipelines Project Migratory Bird Conservation Plan [To be submitted following submittal to USFWS expected October 2014] Resource Report 3 – Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation iii FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT 3—Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation Location in Filing Requirement Environmental Report Describe commercial and recreational warmwater, Section 3.2 and Table 2.3-1 in coldwater, and saltwater fisheries in the affected area and Resource Report 2 associated significant habitats (§380.12 (e) (1)). Describe terrestrial and wetland wildlife and habitats that might be affected by the Project; describe typical species that Section 3.4 and Table 3.4-1 have commercial, recreational, or aesthetic value. (§ 380.12 (e) (2)). Describe the major vegetative cover types that would be crossed and provide the acreage of each vegetative cover Section 3.3 and Table 3.3-1 type that would be affected by construction. (§ 380.12 (e) (3)). Describe the effects of construction, operation, maintenance, clearing, and treatment of the project area on aquatic and Section 3.4.2 terrestrial species and their habitats. (§ 380.12 (e) (4)). Evaluate the potential for short-term, long-term, and permanent impact on the wildlife resources and state-listed endangered or threatened species caused by construction Sections 3.4.2, 3.4.4, and 3.5.4 and operation of the Project and proposed mitigation measures. (§ 380.12(e) (4)). Identify all federally listed or proposed endangered or threatened species that potentially occur in the vicinity of the Section 3.5 Project and discussion results of consultations with other agencies regarding those potential species. (§ 380.12 (e) (5)). Identify all federally listed essential fish habitat (“EFH”) that potentially occur in the vicinity of the Project; identify the result of abbreviated consultations with the National N/A Maritimes and Fisheries Service (“NMFS”); and identify any resulting EFH assessments (§§ 380.12(e)(4) & (7)). Describe any significant biological resources that would be affected. Describe any impacts and any associated Sections 3.2.3, 3.3.2, 3.4.3 and mitigation proposed to avoid or minimize that impact (§§ 3.5 380.12(e)(4) & (7)). Resource Report 3 – Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation iv FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION COMMENTS ON RESOURCE REPORT 3—Fish, Wildlife, and Vegetation Location in Filing Requirement Environmental Report Include data sources, citations, or correspondence from agencies that no waters identified as significant fisheries habitat, included in special state fishery management regulations, having fish stocking programs, commercial Section 3.2.3 fisheries, tribal harvest, or having important recreational value are present along the FSC Project route with the exception of the Kissimmee River. Include in section 3.2.4.3 a discussion regarding the potential to transfer invasive aquatic species during equipment washing and hydrostatic test water appropriations and Section 3.2.4.3 discharges, and the measures that would be implemented to minimize invasive aquatic species between waters. Confirm that FSC would obtain seeding recommendations from local soil conservation authorities, landowners, and land Section 3.3.8 management agencies. Include a discussion of the potential for wildlife and/or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clarias Gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) I. Identity V. Status And Trends a. Biological Features VI. Main Issues b. Images Gallery a. Responsible Aquaculture Practices II. Profile VII. References a. Historical Background a. Related Links b. Main Producer Countries c. Habitat And Biology III. Production a. Production Cycle b. Production Systems c. Diseases And Control Measures IV. Statistics a. Production Statistics b. Market And Trade Identity Clarias gariepinus Burchell, 1822 [Clariidae] FAO Names: En - North African catfish, Fr - Poisson-chat nord-africain, Es - Pez-gato Biological features Body elongate. Head large, depressed and bony with small eyes. Narrow and angular occipital process; gill openings wide; air-breathing labyrinthic organ arising from gill arches; first gill arch with 24 to 110 gillrakers; cleithrum pointed, narrow with longitudinal ridges and with sharpness. Mouth terminal, large. Four pairs of barbels present. Long dorsal and anal fins; without dorsal fin spine and adipose fin. Anterior edge of pectoral spine serrated. Caudal fin rounded. Colour varies from sandy-yellow through gray to olive with dark greenish-brown markings, belly white. View FAO FishFinder Species fact sheet Images gallery FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department 2.5 kg Clarias gariepinus Nursing semi-intensive pond Clarias fry nursing tank Clarias intensive nursing (Photo: John Moehl) Clarias intensive farming Clarias harvest in Cameroon Profile Historical background African catfish are mentioned within traditional capture-based aquaculture (known as wheddos in Benin and Ghana and barochois in Mauritius) for centuries. Their culture in modern times follows a similar trend to that of tilapias: first domestication trials by the year 1950 and adoption of the North African catfish Clarias gariepinus as the most desirable catfish for aquaculture in the mid 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Parasites of African Freshwater Fishes
    A Guide to the Parasites of African Freshwater Fishes Edited by T. Scholz, M.P.M. Vanhove, N. Smit, Z. Jayasundera & M. Gelnar Volume 18 (2018) Chapter 2.1. FISH DIVERSITY AND ECOLOGY Martin REICHARD Diversity of fshes in Africa Fishes are the most taxonomically diverse group of vertebrates and Africa shares a large portion of this diversity. This is due to its rich geological history – being a part of Gondwana, it shares taxa with the Neotropical region, whereas recent close geographical affnity to Eurasia permitted faunal exchange with European and Asian taxa. At the same time, relative isolation and the complex climatic and geological history of Africa enabled major diversifcation within the continent. The taxonomic diversity of African freshwater fshes is associated with functional and ecological diversity. While freshwater habitats form a tiny fraction of the total surface of aquatic habitats compared with the marine environment, most teleost fsh diversity occurs in fresh waters. There are over 3,200 freshwater fsh species in Africa and it is likely several hundreds of species remain undescribed (Snoeks et al. 2011). This high diversity and endemism is likely mirrored in diversity and endemism of their parasites. African fsh diversity includes an ancient group of air-breathing lungfshes (Protopterus spp.). Other taxa are capable of breathing air and tolerate poor water quality, including several clariid catfshes (e.g., Clarias spp.; Fig. 2.1.1D) and anabantids (Ctenopoma spp.). Africa is also home to several bichir species (Polypterus spp.; Fig. 2.1.1A), an ancient fsh group endemic to Africa, and bonytongue Heterotis niloticus (Cuvier, 1829) (Osteoglossidae), a basal actinopterygian fsh.
    [Show full text]
  • Urochloa Arrecta & U. Mutica
    Tropical Forages Urochloa arrecta & U. mutica Scientific name Urochloa arrecta (Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz) Morrone & Zuloaga Urochloa mutica (Forssk.) T.Q. Nguyen Tanner grass, U. arrecta, similar in many respects to U. mutica U. arrecta seeds Synonyms U. arrecta: Basionym: Panicum arrectum Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz; Brachiaria arrecta (Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz) Stent; Brachiaria latifolia Stapf; Brachiaria radicans Napper U. mutica: Basionym: Panicum muticum Forssk.; Brachiaria mutica (Forssk.) Stapf; Panicum barbinode Trin.; Panicum purpurascens Raddi Family/tribe Line illustration of Urochloa arrecta from U. mutica, a short day plant flowering Family: Poaceae (alt. Gramineae) subfamily: Pretoria National Herbarium most prolifically from latitude 10–20º Panicoideae tribe: Paniceae subtribe: Melinidinae. Morphological description Urochloa arrecta: Perennial, culms rambling, 30–130 cm long, rooting from lower nodes; culm nodes glabrous or pubescent. Ligule a fringe of hairs. Leaf-blades 5–25 cm long, 5–15 mm wide. Inflorescence composed of racemes. Racemes 4–15, borne along a central axis, U. mutica in shallow water, Nakai unilateral, 1–10 cm long. Central inflorescence axis 5– Plateau, Laos U. mutica densely bearded culm node; 25 cm long; rachis broadly winged, 0.5–1.5 mm wide, hairy leaf sheath scabrous on margins, glabrous on margins. Spikelet packing adaxial, regular, 2 -rowed. Spikelets solitary; fertile spikelet sessile; fertile floret without rhachilla extension; spikelets elliptic, dorsally compressed, compressed slightly, acute, 3–4.3 mm long, falling entire; rhachilla internodes brief up to lowest fertile floret. Glumes dissimilar, reaching apex of florets, thinner than fertile lemma; lower glume ovate, ⅓ - ½ length of spikelet, membranous, without keels, 3–5- U.
    [Show full text]
  • African Sharptooth Catfish Clarias Gariepinus
    African sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus 1 Taxonomy Species: Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Family: Clariidae Order: Siluriformes Class: Actinopterygii African sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus is a typical air-breathing catfish with a scaleless, bony elongated body with long dorsal and anal fins, and a helmet like head (Figure 1). Colour varies dorsally from dark to light brown and is often mottled with shades of olive and grey while the underside is a pale cream to white (Skelton 2001). It can grow very large with a maximum reported length of 170 cm (IGFA 2001) and weight of 60 kg (Robbins et al. 1991). Figure 1. Lateral view of Clarias gariepinus (Source: FAO 2012). The genus Clarias was reviewed in the 1980s, which resulted in several widespread species being synonymized (Clarias capensis of southern Africa, C. mossambicus of central Africa and C. lazera of west and north Africa) under the name Clarias gariepinus (Teugels 1986). 2 Natural distribution and habitat The native range of C. gariepinus covers most of the African continent, with the exception of Maghreb, Upper and Lower Guinea, and the Cape provinces of South Africa (Picker & Griffiths 2011) (Figure 2). According to Skelton (2001) it is probably the most widely distributed fish in Africa. Jubb (1967) describes its natural distribution as occurring as far south as the Orange River system in the west and the Umtamvuna River in the east of South Africa. Page | 1 C. gariepinus is widely tolerant of many different habitats, even the upper reaches of estuaries, but is considered to be a freshwater species. It favours floodplains, slow flowing rivers, lakes and dams (Skelton 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Management Effects on Herbage Responses, Size of Nutrient Pools, and Litter Dynamics in Grazed ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass (Cynodon Spp.) Pastures
    MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON HERBAGE RESPONSES, SIZE OF NUTRIENT POOLS, AND LITTER DYNAMICS IN GRAZED ‘TIFTON 85’ BERMUDAGRASS (CYNODON SPP.) PASTURES By KESI LIU A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 © 2009 Kesi Liu 2 To my parents and wife, for all their support and encouragement through the year. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to begin by giving my special thanks to Dr. Lynn E. Sollenberger, my supervisory committee chair. His guidance throughout the graduate program has been invaluable and greatly appreciated. Thanks also go to the other members of the supervisory committee, Dr. Kenneth S. Boote, Dr. Donald A. Graetz, Dr. Yoana C. Newman, and Dr. João M.B. Vendramini, for their willingness to serve on the committee, their input and direction during the program, and for reviewing the dissertation. Special thanks go to those who helped during field and laboratory activities. This includes fellow graduate students Sindy Interrante, Renée White, and Miguel Castillo for their great support. Thanks go to the Beef Research Unit staff, Sid Jones and Dwight Thomas, for their help and support at the experimental station. In the Forage Evaluation Support Laboratory, Richard Fethiere and his crew gave the support needed for the forage analyses. Thanks are also due to Dr. Maria Silveira and Dr. Adegbola T. Adesogan and their lab staff for their help and support with laboratory sample preparation and analysis. For the friendship and company during my life in Gainesville, I would like to thank Ming Liu, Zhiwei Chen, and Qien Yang.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarias Batrachus (Siluriformes, Clariidae) in Madura Island, Indonesia 1Ihwan, 2Fajar S
    Presence of Asian catfish Clarias batrachus (Siluriformes, Clariidae) in Madura Island, Indonesia 1Ihwan, 2Fajar S. Pratama, 3Danang Yonarta, 4Abdul R. Faqih, 4Maheno S. Widodo, 5Fitri S. Valen, 5Muhammad B. Tamam, 5,6Veryl Hasan 1 Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic of Bone, Aquaculture Technology Study Program, Bone, South Sulawesi, Indonesia; 2 Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Republic of Indonesia, Directorate General of Marine and Fisheries Resources Surveillance, Tual Surveillance for Marine and Fisheries Resources Base, Tual, Maluku, Indonesia; 3 Study Programe of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sriwijaya, Palembang- Prabumulih street, Ogan Ilir, South Sumatra, Indonesia; 4 Brawijaya University, Fisheries and Marine Science Faculty, Aquatic Resources Management Department, Veteran Malang, East Java, Indonesia; 5 Biology Generation Indonesia Foundation, Zoology Division, Gresik, East Java, Indonesia; 6 Airlangga University, Fisheries and Marine Faculty, Fish Health Management and Aquaculture Department, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. Corresponding author: V. Hasan, [email protected] Abstract. Clarias batrachus (Linnaeus, 1758) was a species that its condition faced the risk of extinction in most parts the Java mainland due to the African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) culture industry. In September 2018, C. batrachus was captured and photographed in the Saroka River, Madura Island, east and of Java mainland. The morphological characters of this species confirm its presence in a new river, more than 150 km northeast from its type locality. The specimens of C. batrachus were characterized as follows: dorsal fin rays 60-66; anal fin rays 47-50; pectoral fin rays 9-11; ventral fin rays 6. Key Words: walking catfish, distribution, native fish, freshwater fish.
    [Show full text]
  • A GIS Assessment of the Suitability of Tilapia and Clarias Pond Farming in Tanzania
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article A GIS Assessment of the Suitability of Tilapia and Clarias Pond Farming in Tanzania Håkan Berg 1,* , Deogratias Mulokozi 2 and Lars Udikas 1 1 Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] 2 Kigoma Centre, Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute, Kigoma P.O. Box 90, Tanzania; deogratiasmulokozi@tafiri.go.tz * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Aquaculture production in Tanzania has increased in recent years, responding to an increased demand for fish, but the scale and productivity of smallholder aquaculture remains below the level needed to support significant sector growth in Tanzania. This study assesses, through geospatial analyses, the suitability for freshwater pond farming of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus in Tanzania, by assessing the geographical distribution of seven criteria (water availability, water temperature, soil texture, terrain slope, availability of farm inputs, potential farm-gate sales, and access to local markets) identified as important for fish pond farming. The criteria were developed and standardized from 15 sub-criteria, which were classified into a four-level suitability scale based on physical scores. The individual weights of the different criteria in the overall GIS suitability assessment were determined through a multi-criteria evaluation. The final results were validated and compared through field observations, interviews with 89 rural and 11 urban aquaculture farmers, and a questionnaire survey with 16 regional fisheries officers. Our results indicate that there is a good potential for aquaculture in Tanzania. Almost 60% of Tanzania is assessed as being suitable and Citation: Berg, H.; Mulokozi, D.; 40% as moderately suitable for small-scale subsistence pond farming, which is the dominating fish Udikas, L.
    [Show full text]
  • PALM 31 3 Working.Indd
    Volume 31: Number 3 > 2014 The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Palmetto Rare Plant Conservation at Bok Tower Gardens ● Yaupon Redeemed ● The Origin of Florida Scrub Plant Diversity Donna Bollenbach and Juliet Rynear A Collaboration of Passion, Purpose and Science Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Conservation Program “Today nearly 30 percent of the native fl ora in the United States is considered to be 1 of conservation concern. Without human intervention, many of these plants may be gone within our lifetime. Eighty percent of the at-risk species are closely related to plants with economic value somewhere in the world, and more than 50 percent are related to crop species...but it can be saved.” – Center for Plant Conservation Ask the average Florida citizen to name at least one endangered native animal in the state and they will likely mention the Florida manatee or the Florida panther. Ask the same person to name one endangered native plant and they give you a blank stare. Those of us working to conserve Florida’s unique plant species know this all 2 too well, and if the job isn’t diffi cult enough, a lack of funding and support for the conservation of land supporting imperiled plant communities makes it harder. Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Conservation Program is one of 39 botanical institutions throughout the United States that collaborate with the Center for Plant Conservation (CPC) to prevent the extinction of native plants in the United States. Created in 1984, CPC institutions house over 750 living specimens of the nation’s most endangered native plants, the largest living collection of rare plants in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Wide-Leaf Warea Is an Erect Annual Herb In
    Wide-leaf Warea (or Clasping Warea) Warea amplexifolia Nutall ide-leaf warea is an erect annual herb in the Federal Status: Endangered (April 29, 1987) mustard family (Brassicaceae). The species has Critical Habitat: None Designated Wan extremely limited distribution, covering a Florida Status: Endangered north-south distance of about 80.5 km along the northern portion of the Lake Wales Ridge. In the South Florida Recovery Plan Status: Contribution (May 1999) Ecosystem, Warea amplexifolia is known to persist at only Geographic Coverage: South Florida two sites in Polk County and one in Osceola County. Warea amplexifolia is endemic to high pine (sandhill) habitat, which has been greatly reduced by conversion of natural Figure 1. County distribution of wide-leaf warea. habitat to citrus groves, residential and commercial development, sand mining, and the lack of proper fire management in the remaining natural habitats. This account represents South Floridas contribution to the existing recovery plan for the wide-leaf warea (FWS 1993). Description Warea amplexifolia is an annual herb in the mustard family (Brassicaceae). Plants may be 30 to 100 cm tall and the stalk may be unbranched or, more often, branching mid- way up the stem. Leaves are alternate, from 2 to 5 cm long, and 1 to 3 cm wide, smaller as they ascend the stalk, with a rounded apex and entire margin. On young plants, the leaves are slightly folded along the midrib, tipped upward, and the lobes at the base of leaves reach around the stem. This characteristic has led to one of the common names for the species, clasping warea.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Grass Ecotypes for Potential Use in Reseeding of Pastoral Fields in the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands of Kenya
    EVALUATION OF GRASS ECOTYPES FOR POTENTIAL USE IN RESEEDING OF PASTORAL FIELDS IN THE ARID AND SEMI-ARID LANDS OF KENYA By Everlyne CheptArus KirwA, B.SC., M.Sc. (UoN) A80/83321/2012 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE AND CROP PROTECTION FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI ©2019 DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my lovely husband Dr. Muge and children Peter, Chantal and Leon for their relentless support and encouragement during the preparation. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge the funding support from the East African Agricultural productivity programme (EAAPP) for the scholarship and, Arid and Semi-Arid Lands Agricultural productivity research programme (ASAL-APRP) and National Council for Science and Technology for partially supporting my research work. I sincerely appreciate the input of my supervisors Prof. Eliud Kahiu Ngugi, Prof. George N. Chemining’wa and Dr. William Ngoyawu Mnene who greatly supported me in the development of this thesis. I would also like to sincerely appreciate posthumously the input of the late Prof. Kiarie Njoroge who guided me through proposal development, research implementation and partly writing of my thesis. Thanks are also due to the Director General, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization and the staff of KALRO Headquarters, Kiboko, Buchuma, Mtwapa and Biotechnology Centre Kabete for logistical support. Finally to my family, relatives and friends, thanks all for
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D to ERP Application Listed Species Occurrences and Project
    Appendix D to ERP Application NUCOR Steel Micro Mill Appendix D to ERP Application Listed Species Occurrences and Project Effects for Nucor Steel Micro Mill in Avon Park, Polk County, Florida This listed species occurrence information and project effects discussion is supplemental to the Wetlands and Habitat Assessment Technical Memorandum (Appendix C), which is also attached to the ERP application. See Appendix C for project description and location map. This supplemental information is provided to assist the technical review of the project’s potential effect on Federal and State listed species and/or their habitats. Included with this supplemental information are these figures: Figure D1 – Wildlife Observations Onsite and within 1 Mile Radius Figure D2 – Wildlife Observation Records and Crossings within 5 Mile Radius Figure D3 – Site Photographs May-June 2018 Wildlife and Habitat Onsite Habitat The entire area is currently managed citrus cultivation. No natural upland habitats remain in the project area. A small area of mature oak trees near the former home site remains near Pabor Lake to the south. Construction contractors’ trailers will be parked in that area. Access roads of compacted imported clay fill soil or compacted sand and densely grass, encircle and traverse the groves. These conditions can be seen in site photographs attached to this Appendix D. The citrus groves offer minimal habitat requirements for very few listed species. No wetland habitats or other surface water habitats occur within the project footprint, including the proposed rail spur, and access roads. Offsite Habitat The micro mill will be over 1000 feet from any remaining non-cultivated uplands east and west of the proposed development site.
    [Show full text]
  • Smuts Finger Grass (Digitaria Eriantha Cv Irene) Root Growth Assessment and Some Physicochemical Characteristics on Coal Mined Land Compacted Soil
    JASEM ISSN 1119-8362 Full-text Available Online at J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jasem Vol. 22 (8) 1293 –1296 August 2018 All rights reserved http://ww.bioline.org.br/ja Smuts Finger Grass (Digitaria Eriantha Cv Irene) Root Growth Assessment and Some Physicochemical Characteristics on Coal Mined Land Compacted Soil *MOSEBI, PE; TRUTER, WF; MADAKADZE, IC Department of Plant Production and Soil Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The coal mine soil layers contained high values of bulk density of 1.80gcm -3 and 1.90gcm -3 at depths of 0-20 and 20-40 cm respectively, low contents of organic matter, soil pH and soil nutrients concentration. A field trial was conducted to investigate root growth responses of Smuts Finger grass (Digitaria eriantha cv Irene) to compacted mine soil layers. It was revealed that the greatest root masses were noted in the upper horizons with progressively significantly less in the deeper horizons. Roots of this species penetrated compacted soil layers and decreased soil bulk density. The highest soil pH values were found in the upper layers with greatest root biomass. Soil nutrients (P, Mg, Ca, Na and K) status was also better in the upper layers. Smuts Finger grass could be used as an alternative method for rehabilitation of compacted mine soil layers. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v22i8.24 Copyright: Copyright © 2018 Mosebi et al . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCL), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]