An Intentional Neurodiverse and Intergenerational Cohousing Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Intentional Neurodiverse and Intergenerational Cohousing Community An Intentional Neurodiverse and Intergenerational Cohousing Community Empowered by Autistic Voices Documented by: ASU team Contact: 612-396-7422 or [email protected] Meeting Agenda Project overview and updates (3-4:30PM) • Overview • Questions from audience • Fill out interest survey • Sign up for volunteer committees Working session (4:45-5:45PM) • Introductions – meet others interested in this community • Visioning exercise • Deeper dive into floor plans and financing • Discuss interest in long term commitments to the project and how to pool funds for land acquisition • Sign up for volunteer committees 2 About ASU ASU (Autism SIBS Universe) is a non-profit organization - 501c3 registered with IRS in 2018 founded by Autistics - support from peers, parents and community members Vision is to create sustainable neurodiverse communities where people with all types of abilities live together to support each other ASU Board members Mix of Autistics, parents and community members 3 Important When are a Neurodiverse community and we welcome people of all abilities We are an intentional community designed with Autistics in mind, but we are NOT an Autism or Disability only housing A community where there is something for everyone Naturally supported safe, trusted and sustainable living for ALL – Independent homes with easy access to COMMUNITY, less isolation, connected relationships, more fun, Healthier and more long term supports For families without Autism For Autistics and their - A GREAT opportunity to families – A safety net for live in a sustainable their children’s future. environment while Better support dealing supporting a neurodiverse with Autism and related community and vice versa challenges. More respite. For Autistics – More support from people that understand Autism. More opportunities to contribute to the community. Less loneliness, and fear of future 5 Cohousing is on the rise in America Living Alone, Together: Autism Cohousing: America has shifted more http://www.autismhousingnetwork.org/housing towards independence and and use filter to find cohousing less towards community and the trend is now reversing … Good examples of cohousing for disabilities: • North Street Neighborhood, NC Cohousing: • Building Ohana, WA https://www.cohousing.org// • One Kin Roof, FL • Our Home, Inclusive Community Collaborative, OR 6 The coming Care Crisis as children with Autism are growing up Above graph is showing only people using residential care funding. In reality, the no. of disabled people living with family is over $6M. Over a million are living with a caregiver over 60 7 Estimated Number of IDD Caregiving Families and Families supported by IDD Agencies: FY 1988-2015 United States Minnesota Data Source: The State of the States in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 8 ttp://stateofthestates.org/index.php/view-state-profile s What do young Autistics do after high school? Cohousing can significantly improve quality of life for Autistics! Source: National Autism Indicators Report. Transition into Young Adulthood - 2015 9 What do Autistics and their caregivers want? We interviewed a lot of people…. Many Autistics do not like living in congregational and provider controlled setting – it’s can be isolating plus less supportive long term as parents/caregivers age Even living with family members in standard communities can be isolating for many (both neurotypical and Autism families) Aging amplifies the fear of isolation for ourselves and our loved ones! 10 DHS Top Guidelines To ensure we do not mimic qualities of an institution DHS shared the following qualities that are critical to maintain during the design and implementation of the intentional living community 1. The intentional living community should be available for the general public and not created only for people with disabilities and their families 2. The intentional living community must be designed in a way that people receiving services living in the community have a choice of service providers (and a choice of where they live) 3. Housing and services should be entirely separate. The intentional living community, and affiliated entities, should not combine housing and HCBS waiver services NOTE: We will continue to partner with DHS as needed in the future Note: ASU is NOT an MA licensed provider, a group home, a foster care or an institution 11 ASU Conceptual Site Plan (Draft only) Independent homes for privacy. Shared common spaces for shared meals, activities, celebrations and collaborative work. Back doors open (optional) into a covered walkway/corridor that connects to the common house. Sizing: Location, type of housing, land size, land cost, legal structure Legal factors and documentation 12 ASU Common House (Draft only) Reception/Security desk, Kitchen, Dining, Sensory spaces, Water play, Theatre, Gym, Activity and conference rooms - have to be prioritized based on funding availability 13 ASU Floor Plans Cohousing communities typically range from 900-1300 square feet (we can go smaller or bigger as needed) Every house has basic amenities – Kitchen, Living, Dining, Bedrooms, bathrooms, storage, laundry and garages Our hope is to build one level homes (for intergenerational living). Accessibility options available 14 Activities and common meals The common house will be a happening hub and a safe space with easy access to group activities, socialization, friendships, recreation, health and wellness for ALL This environment is very conducive for Autistics drawn to self-directed learning and activities where they choose what, when and how they want to learn or experience things! Where needed, Autistics need to bring their own caregiver or PCA to support them with activities Note: ASU is NOT an MA licensed day program 15 Volunteering and Jobs There will be many diverse opportunities to contribute: Work on ASU team or on committees Write articles/blogs/poetry to educate the community about Autism and cohousing Participate in community meetings Grow food Cook and serve meals Provide PCA support Clean, lawn mow or snow blow common areas Help schedule social events, transportation, etc. …….. Note: there will be minimum number of required volunteer hours per housing unit 16 Microboards and ASU as a safety net for Autistics A microboard is a formalized “circle of support,” consisting of a small group of individuals who assist an individual with disabilities in creating and implementing a life plan – a great “personalized” long term support system as parents age Community increases opportunities to support each other with guardians and microboard members within the community ASU will serve as an umbrella microboard to guide and support individual microboards and also work as a safety net for individual microboards Participation is by choice only Sample Microboard structure Using ASU as an umbrella microboard is optional 17 Autistics in leadership roles and key part of developing and supporting the community Balance of Autistics and Non-Autistics on our Boards Autistic residents have full leadership role and choice in housing, employment, services, providers, transportation, community and anything else that impacts their lives The ASU community will be a place where non-verbal Autistics have more support for their complex communication needs: Verbal AAC (Augmentative and Alternative Communication ) Supported typing (facilitated communication) RPM (Rapid Prompting method) 18 Government funds Age Housing, Food, Activities and Services Clothing, etc. Below 18 Waivers and CSG grants 18 and over (living SSI income Waivers and CSG grants in parent home): 18 and over (living Home Waivers and CSG grants in ‘Own’ home) ownership and rental programs My “Own’ Home per DHS guidelines: Own unit (owned, leased or rented) with own SSI income entrance and house number MSA housing assistance Utilities program SNAP program GRH funding ?? Note: Not every activity in the common house will have a fee Note: Government assistance varies by individual Financing – Market Rate homes For families who choose to build without affordable housing options Recommendation: Live in smaller houses - pretty standard in cohousing communities since there’s easy access to shared community space Land acquisition – pool money from people interested in the community Buy a home and share it with your loved ones Buy a home for yourself and another home for your loved ones Autistics could potentially get their own mortgage. For example, People with disability open an IDA (Individual Development Account) to save towards down payment. If the qualified mortgage is not adequate to build a home, family members can build a ‘deed restricted affordable home’ for their loved ones Buy extra houses to rent to others Parallel effort: Fundraising and grants to help reduce cost of common spaces Disclaimer: The above details differ case by case Financing – Affordable Housing The best tips we gathered from cohousing communities … 1. Explore ADU’s (Accessory Dwelling Units or granny units) 2. Use Section 8 vouchers if you have one. This funding has high wait lists (Applications for the waiting list lottery are open June 12th to June 18th) 3. Explore land trusts for reduced costs 4. Tiny homes have zoning challenges, so if possible explore building houses with smaller footprints or studios could be option 5. Low income tax credit funds will limit us to rentals only, plus it’s not a model that will work for our mixed-income community Sample - inclusive cohousing in Portland: Very important
Recommended publications
  • Religion, Ethics, and Poetics in a Tamil Literary Tradition
    Tacit Tirukku#a#: Religion, Ethics, and Poetics in a Tamil Literary Tradition The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Smith, Jason William. 2020. Tacit Tirukku#a#: Religion, Ethics, and Poetics in a Tamil Literary Tradition. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Divinity School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37364524 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use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
    [Show full text]
  • The Commune Movement During the 1960S and the 1970S in Britain, Denmark and The
    The Commune Movement during the 1960s and the 1970s in Britain, Denmark and the United States Sangdon Lee Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History September 2016 i The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement ⓒ 2016 The University of Leeds and Sangdon Lee The right of Sangdon Lee to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ii Abstract The communal revival that began in the mid-1960s developed into a new mode of activism, ‘communal activism’ or the ‘commune movement’, forming its own politics, lifestyle and ideology. Communal activism spread and flourished until the mid-1970s in many parts of the world. To analyse this global phenomenon, this thesis explores the similarities and differences between the commune movements of Denmark, UK and the US. By examining the motivations for the communal revival, links with 1960s radicalism, communes’ praxis and outward-facing activities, and the crisis within the commune movement and responses to it, this thesis places communal activism within the context of wider social movements for social change. Challenging existing interpretations which have understood the communal revival as an alternative living experiment to the nuclear family, or as a smaller part of the counter-culture, this thesis argues that the commune participants created varied and new experiments for a total revolution against the prevailing social order and its dominant values and institutions, including the patriarchal family and capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 9, Issue 2 Tčċ Tėćďđ
    Page 1 The Trail Volume 9, Issue 2 TčĊ TėĆĎđ Eco Fact: The flowers of Skunk Cabbage—one of New Jersey’s first plants to emerge in spring—can actually produce their own heat, allowing them to melt through snow and ice in early spring In This Issue: Finding The Speed of Evolution (2-3) From your editors… Jedi of the Deep (4-5) Dear Readers, Rutgers Will Not Have a 300th Anniversary (6-7) Whether this finds you preparing for one last exam before our The Evolution of Disease (8-9) spring break, or already happily on a plane to warmer climes, Capstone Project (10-11) we invite you to take a moment to look through this latest Privately-Funded Space Race (12-13) edition of The Trail. We have an exceptional spring staff with Are You Getting Your Vitamin Sea? us here at the Human Ecology Department’s monthly (14-15) newsletter—one whose diverse backgrounds bring you Intentional Pioneers (16-17) accounts of mysterious whale clans, the future of artificial LED Light Bulbs: What You Should Know intelligence here at Rutgers, and much more. Enjoy, and (18) here’s wishing everyone a restorative time off! Unprotecting the Protected (19-20) Happy Trails, Algae & The Cow Methane Problem (21) Mercury Levels Dropping in Tuna (22-23) James, Maia, Sarah, and Ian Where’s Your Water From? (24-25) Scott Pruitt’s Environmental Record (26) Enviro. Impacts of a US-Mexico Border Wall (27-28) The Trump Administration’s Temporary A special thank you Freeze on EPA Grants and Contracts Prompts Concern in the American Public to our wonderful (29-30) advisors, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Creating Social Justice in Niches of the Environmental Movement
    Intentional Unity: The Challenges of Creating Social Justice in Niches of the Environmental Movement A Division III e-Booklet By Colin Eldridge Read original online version here Original logo designed by and property of Colin Eldridge This project is dedicated to my late father John Charles Eldridge, and my amazing mother JoAnn Ellsworth, without whom I would not be where I am today. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction Section 1: Environment What are Niches in the Environmental Movement? The Problem: Niches in the Environmental Movement are Socially Unjust Histories and Realities of Environmental Movement Niches Work Cited Section 2: Community Excerpts from Interviews Conducted in Intentional Communities A Critique of Diversity Initiatives My Idealist Model for an Anti-Oppressive Intentional Community Section 3: Economy Understanding the Permaculture Ethics The “Sweet Spot” of Fair Share, People Care, and Earth Care Regenerative Economics Section 4: Anti-Oppressive Education The Ladder of Inference Social Permaculture The Systems Thinking Approach The Iceberg Model The Iceberg of Oppression On Paralysis and White Guilt Section 5: Moving Forward More Resources for the Reader What now? Conclusion Glossary 2 Introduction Objectives of this Booklet 1) To point out the inherent flaws within the environmental movement which perpetuate systems of oppression. 2) To reflect on diversity within the niche of intentional communities, and offer excerpts of interviews from an independent field study. 3) To provide a commentary on the “sweet spot” of social, environmental and economic justice. 4) To offer an anti-oppressive educational framework specifically for niches within the environmental movement. About the Author This booklet touches on many subjects of power and privilege.
    [Show full text]
  • Intentional Communities Manual, 1St Edition
    Intentional Communities Manual, 1st Edition INTENTIONAL COMMUNITIES MANUAL 1st Edition, 2001 From the Australian National Intentional Communities Conferences & South East Australia Communities Gatherings 1 Intentional Communities Manual, 1st Edition About This Manual We hope this manual will be of use to those interested in joining, establishing or developing an intentional community. The idea for this manual came from the 2nd National Intentional Communities Conference held at Dharmananda in September 1998. The process of its creation was most recently taken on by the South East Australian Intentional Communities Gathering at Commonground in January 2001. It is a collection of articles and handouts, many of which were not written for this specific purpose but which we hope will prove useful. It is intended that a more comprehensive and structured edition be built on this for future publication, designed as a “How To” manual for those establishing intentional communities. All articles were donated free of charge and with the understanding that this manual will be distributed and copied liberally and without profit. Any financial donations will be put towards the costs of production and further promotion of intentional communities and should be payable to: “Fruit Salad” c/o Commonground PO Box 474 Seymour, Vic 3661 We would welcome any feedback, suggestions, questions and offers of help. Please forward them to myself: Dale Howard, Moora Moora Co-op, PO Box 214 Healesville, Vic 3777. tel: 03 5962 1094 e-mail: [email protected] Acknowledgments
    [Show full text]
  • Intentional Communities: Lifestyles Based on Ideals
    Intentional Communities: Lifestyles Based on Ideals Geoph Kozeny Drawing on information from his visits to hundreds of communities across the continent, Geoph Kozeny gives an overview of the communities movement — not only its current state, but also how it has evolved and its prospects for the future. He points out the common bonds that link communities in spite of their diversity. This article originally appeared in the 1995 Community Directory (print version) and has been accessed from the website of the Fellowship of Intentional Communities at www.ic.org. TODAY MANY PEOPLE ARE QUESTIONING our society’s values, and asking what gives meaning to life. They bemoan the “loss of community,” and are looking for ways to reintroduce community values into their lives. There are several options now available to the average person that satisfy at least the basic cravings: many folks get involved with various civic or social change groups; others get more deeply involved in the activities of their church; still others create friendships and support networks in their neighborhoods. Those with strong motivation to live their values “full time” often seek to join or create intentional communities. An “intentional community” is a group of people who have chosen to live together with a common purpose, working cooperatively to create a lifestyle that reflects their shared core values. The people may live together on a piece of rural land, in a suburban home, or in an urban neighborhood, and they may share a single residence or live in a cluster of dwellings. This definition spans a wide variety of groups, including (but not limited to) communes, student cooperatives, land co-ops, cohousing groups, monasteries and ashrams, and farming collectives.
    [Show full text]
  • A Netnographic Study on the Slow Fashion Online Community
    Content with less: A netnographic study on the Slow Fashion online community Bárbara Cardoso 152118121 Dissertation written under the supervision of Pedro Oliveira Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of requirements for the MSc in Management with specialization in Strategic Marketing, at the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, January 2020. 1 Title: Content with less: A netnographic study on the Slow Fashion online community Author: Bárbara Cardoso Abstract The slow fashion movement is gaining prominence as consumers have become alerted to the fashion industry’s practices. In a fast-fashion dominated industry, slow fashion proposes a holistic outlook on fashion, considering garment’s movement throughout the supply chain. It advocates an ethically conscious and environmentally aware fashion, ensuring transparent production systems. The present dissertation aims to study the slow fashion online community resorting to netnography. Deviating from previous academic research focused on slow fashion definition, the present research uncovers slow fashion’s meaning to its advocates and common practices. Results demonstrate how slow fashion’s adoption is consensually perceived as a journey and identified its drivers and barriers. The slow movement weights circular fashion and anti-consumerism principles aiming for self-contentment with less. It contributes to current academic discussion on fashion brand’s trust, unveiling skeptical and defrauded consumers that resort to alternative means to evaluate corporations’ credibility. Mistrust in brands is aggravated by the inexistence of an organization nor government body which regulates fashion industry guidelines. Transparency was appointed to lessen the perceived deception greenwashing exerts on brand attitude and perceived company performance. Implications suggest a strategy focused on transparent communication and consumer education, namely on how to increase garments durability.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Good Reasons Why We Should All Live in Intentional Communities
    10 Good Reasons Why We Should All Live in Intentional Communities (and a few reasons why we don’t) Andrew Plant. Milltown Community. Scotland Just to be clear – when I use the term ‘intentional communities’ I use it to include communes, communities, eco-villages, co-housing projects and, of course, also Camphill communities. No two communities are the same and so what follows is a lot of generalisations and might reflect aspirations rather than daily reality. Nonetheless, there are hopefully enough general truths here to give a fair picture of what life is like (or at least could be like, or should be like) in intentional communities. So, why should we all live in a community? 1. Because it’s good for you It seems that our sense of self-worth and well-being is inextricably linked to the feeling that we belong; that we are part of a group and part of something greater than ourselves. This sense of belonging allows us to feel acknowledged and recognised as who we truly are. This sense of belonging is very much part and parcel of being a member of an intentional community. In an intentional community we can also find meaning and purpose as part of a social setting that is positive and life-affirming. Through sharing lives on a daily basis we can also enjoy mutually supportive relationships that can be more trusting than usual. Intentional communities are busy places and there is a great variety of things to get involved in – socialising, work projects, sharing skills, meetings, and of course also fun and celebrations.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAC STRATEGIC REPORT 11-28-2008 Anarchist Movement
    Matt Blunt Mark S. James James F. Keathley Van Godsey Governor Director, DPS Colonel, MSHP Director, MIAC S E R V IC E PROTECTION A N D MIAC STRATEGIC REPORT 11-28-2008 Anarchist Movement This Strategic Report analyzes the Anarchist Movement and related Anarchist activities. The majority of this in- formation is open source and can be located in many anarchy related websites. RECIPIENTS ARE REMINDED THIS DOCUMENT IS A STRATEGIC REPORT; THE INFORMATION THEREIN SHOULD NOT SERVE AS THE BASIS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITY. History The first known usage of the word Anarchy appears in the play “Seven Against Thebes” by Aeschylus dated at 467 BC. The heroine, Antigone openly refuses to abide by the rulers' decree to leave her brother Polyneices' body unburied, as punishment for his participation in the attack on Thebes. In this context, anarchy is referenced as a refusal to abide by government decree. According to Harold Barclay (a professor in anthropology and notable writer in anarchist theory), long before anarchism emerged as a distinct perspective, human beings lived for thousands of years in societies without gov- ernment. It was only after the rise of hierarchical societies that anarchist ideas were formulated as a critical re- sponse to and rejection of coercive political institutions and hierarchical social relationships. Thomas Jefferson spoke of his respect for a society with no government. "The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • "We Try to Create the World That We Want": Intentional Communities
    “We Try to Create the World That We Want” Intentional Communities Forging Livable Lives in St. Louis Joshua Lockyer Department of Behavioral Sciences Arkansas Tech University Peter Benson Department of Anthropology Washington University in St. Louis With: Daniel Burton, LeeAnn Felder, Danielle Hayes, Erica Jackey, and Alysa Lerman Washington University in St. Louis 2011 Funding for this paper was provided by a grant from the Livable Lives Initiative at Washington University in St. Louis. CSD Working Papers No. 11-02 Campus Box 1196 One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-9906 (314) 935.7433 csd.wustl.edu I NTENTIONAL C OMMUNITIES F ORGING L IVABLE L IVES IN S T . L OUIS Livable Lives Initiative Washington University in St. Louis The university-wide Livable Lives Initiative investigates what social conditions and policy supports can make life with a low or moderate income stable, secure, satisfying, and successful. The aim is to build a large body of work that informs local programs as well as state and federal policies in economic security, employment, public health, education, housing, and other key areas. Steering Committee Members Marion Crain, School of Law Renee Cunningham-Williams, School of Social Work Garrett Duncan, Department of Education Steve Fazzari, Department of Economics Debra Haire-Joshu, School of Social Work Bob Hansman, School of Architecture Amanda Moore McBride, School of Social Work Timothy McBride, School of Social Work Bob Pollak, Olin Business School and Department of Economics Ramesh Raghavan, School of Social Work Mark Rank, School of Social Work Michael Sherraden, School of Social Work Itai Sened, Department of Political Science and Center for New Institutional Social Sciences Consuelo Wilkins, School of Medicine C ENTER FOR S OCIAL D EVELOPMENT 1 W ASHINGTON U NIVERSITY IN S T .
    [Show full text]
  • Together Resilient
    T What if community is the answer? O “When people ask me where to move to escape climate change, I tell them G there’s no escape and that the thing to look for is a strong community. is E book explains how to build that kind of community anywhere—it’s a manual T for the future.” H Bill McKibben E Author of Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet R “Is it possible to jettison our current system of exploitation and R environmental destruction, and create a new system, that is not only E S Resilient sustainable but affords us a comfortable and fullling life? e answer is a resounding yes. Ma’ikwe Ludwig eloquently reminds us how the way is I L fraught with challenges and shows us how to conquer them. is is a I must-read for anyone who cares about the future of the human race.” E Chong Kee Tan, PhD N Founder of Bay Bucks T Real hope comes from looking uninchingly at our current circumstances and then committing wholeheartedly to creative action. Never has that been more urgently needed than right now, with the climate crisis looming larger every day. is book advocates for citizen-led, community-based action rst and foremost: why wait for the government when you can take action today, with your neighbors? From small solutions to the full re-invention of the systems we nd ourselves in, this book mixes anecdote with data-based research to bring you a wide range of options that all embody compassion, creativity, and cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes Community?
    What makes community? In many ways the word community is overused today and as a result the word has gotten a bad rap. With this in mind it is important that any discussions about community starts with defining what we mean when we use the word. Some refer to community as any group of people in close physical proximity. However, just because people live in the same apartment building it does not necessarily mean that a sense of community exists. A place where people live or go to school can be a community, but it does not necessarily have to one. So what makes a group a true community? Defining community is something like defining friendship; it is easy to experience and feel yet difficult to truly capture the concept. You’d think—or at least, I did—that the root meaning of the word “community” is “coming together as one.” But it’s not. The old Latin word communitatus comes from two even older words that mean “the changes or exchanges that connect people” and “small, intimate, or local.” Given this background, Sheldon Berman (1990) offers the following definition: A community is a group of people who acknowledge their common purpose, respect their differences, share in group decision making as well as in responsibility for the actions of the group, and support each other’s growth. In tying this definition of community to what we are trying to do this summer, I want to encourage each individual to focus on how your summer experience will impact your life in the following three areas: (1) your relationship to God; (2) your relationship to others; (3) your relationship to the larger world (including the place and people you will be interacting with this summer).
    [Show full text]