Dora Budor New Galerie
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DORA BUDOR NEW GALERIE Selected press No. 49, 2016 September - October From Flash Art feature Desperate Things Boško Blagojević on the work of Dora Budor What does a thing know of its own production? The heart-lung machine diagram, a medical device used Previous page: language here isn’t mine, but rather comes from the to sustain the body during open-heart surgery — calls Mental Parasite Retreat 1 (2014) title of a recent work by the New York–based Croa- to mind familiar systems and narratives. In it we see Courtesy of the Artist tian artist Dora Budor (b. 1984). I’ve turned her title an ecology shaped by human endeavor, the folly of and New Galerie, Paris into a question. The work that it refers to (What Does technological ambition and the tension between the Photography by a Thing Know of Its Own Production, 2016) is a kind of organic and inorganic. But what to make of the skin Aurélien Mole sculptural relief incorporating a disarray of materials: prop’s past life and its relation to its present reality? laboratory glassware, cement, silicone tubing, rocks, At New Galerie in Paris in early 2015, Budor pre- resin, soil and other similarly brown, earthly colored sented Mental Parasite Retreat 1 (2014), by now one of things making their way into what looks like topsoil her more well-known works. A freestanding sculpture, taken from some far-off, dystopic junkyard. All of it consists of a cinema chair reupholstered with silicone this is wall-bound and framed in an elegant stained and implanted with a prosthetic cyborg chest in its walnut — a sculpture in the drag of painting. Most center. Within it, an unseen animatronic device creates prominent in the display is a large scrap of prosthetic a subtle motion. The chest prop is from the Ameri- flesh, a blooming wart in the lower right-hand side of can science-fiction film Surrogates (2009) — a thriller, the muddy stream. Reading the materials list for the starring Bruce Willis, based on a comic book about a work you might learn that the flesh, unconvincing near future in which people live vicariously through but evocative in form, is zombie skin taken from the immersive, remote-controlled robot avatars. For a film schlocky, mostly derided (but commercially successful) with an eighty-million-dollar production budget, the sci-fi horror film Underworld: Evolution (2006). Like leading man’s prosthetic that Budor has buried in her much of Budor’s work, the piece is an example of her work looks rather modest — the kind of thing you reanimation of Hollywood film props sourced from might expect to find in a high-end costume shop. But memorabilia and collectables dealers. So often cen- herein lies a truth about film production’s increasing tral to these wall-bound and free-standing sculptures, immateriality. The special-effects prop is more and various special effects props and architectural models more akin to a rough sketch in a film’s genealogy, a previously used in film productions are acquired by kind of material starting point that’s later refined and the artist and elaborated into something quite different sutured into the final work during the heavy lifting than (but aware of, in touch with) their former screen of digital postproduction. These props, then, share a destinies. The composition — which is based on a common ramshackle materiality: they are things that 43 — september / october 2016 DORA BUDOR NEW GALERIE 310_SO 16_Features.indd 42 30/08/16 16:43 310_SO 16_Features.indd 43 30/08/16 16:43 feature feature No. 49, 2016 September - October From Flash Art feature feature were never meant to persist in their thingness. Before If you were to try and identify a definitive trait Consider Budor’s photographic suite When the Sick monstrous formations. Budor presented several works they find their way into Budor’s sculptures — that is, of experience under Western technocratic capitalism Rule the World, Conference of Psychotic Women and Al- in the show, not least of which was a new series titled in production and on the screen — they are objects (or during the past decade, you could do worse than talk lergic to the 20th Century (all 2015). In these three works “The Architect.” These were screen-like wall works lenses) through which we see and make sense of the about images. Images, in a sense, are the things that bind we see a type of cool but deeply saturated shallow- made from metal frames and semitransparent silicone cinematic narrative. In both design and manufacture, individual experience most closely to the increasingly focus photography that could have been lifted from The sheets. On the silicone sheets were compositions of the props are intended to be photographed and dis- networked economies of surveillance and exchange that Bourne Identity or a similar thriller. The photographs SFX transfer scars used in the making of 300: Rise of an carded, to be incorporated fully into the shadow world shepherd us through daily life. They are the postproduc- actually are inspired by Robert Altman’s 3 Women Empire (2014), the sequel to the fantasy war film 300 of the movie screen as images without a referent, what tion of the everyday, what sutures the rough sketches of (1977) — all feature a single figure in the shape of a (2007). Budor further adorned these screens with her Derrida might call ghosts. Outside of the image they our lived reality into the sensible narratives from which tall, slender female. She wears unremarkable streetwear own electrical fuse boxes, stainless-steel conduit, sili- become something else. Like the cinema chair itself, we derive the pleasure and purpose of our public selves. in gray, black and white. Her body is youthful and at- cone-cast wiring and electrical fittings — all stuff that usually cloaked in the darkness of the theater, the prop In this regard, the digital image has firmly ensconced tractive, always alone, and moves through nondescript anchored each work to the architecture of the museum’s referent of these images often relates to our own bod- itself in the constitution of post-Internet selfhood. To urban environs. Her face, however, is at a disjuncture exhibition halls, making them prosthetic outgrowths of ies — which, again like the cinema chair, we readily be a person today, especially a person of a certain age with her body, inundated with patently artificial wrin- some internal biology of the historic German institu- use without noticing or contemplating. It’s a fact not or generation, is to project images of yourself onto the This page: kles, the battered skin of a woman deep into advanced tion. The resulting forms, with their cold stainless steel lost on the artist, and certainly not unrelated to her world — at least that seems to be the case for now. If we Allergic to the 20th age; her hair, likewise, is a strung-out and dusty gray. and spills of fake blood, call to mind some transitional Century (2015) process. In her operation of dislocation, she renders accept this assertion, its dialogic extension becomes one In the photographs, she seems like the target of sur- fantasy tech hybrid between a flat-screen television, a Courtesy of the Artist and her source material awkwardly incomplete and highly in which experience is increasingly guided by the future New Galerie, Paris veillance. She is self-aware as she moves through the malfunctioning light box and a medical gurney — all conspicuous. Rather than simply collecting them as point at which it becomes an image. Much of Budor’s Photography in city, in some instances warily studying the landscape devices before which (and on top of) human bodies bits of Hollywood fiction, Budor seems to instantiate output over the past few years has focused on several collaboration with Robert about her, though never locking eyes with the camera come to rest, to look, or to die. The body scars from the Kulisek a desire to inhabit their decrepit insufficiencies. To related ideas of projection. In many works, she enacts that peruses her. 300 sequel push the work toward a weird, disjunctive understand something of the use trajectory of these a kind of reversal of the material film prop’s projection Next page: In 2015, Budor’s work was included in “Inhuman,” untimeliness. The original 300 film, in all of its vulgar props, imagine, for a moment, the desperate world of into the phantom image narratives of Hollywood fan- One Million Years of a group exhibition at the Fridericianum in Kassel, Ger- American chauvinism, captured rather distinctly the the unnoticed throwaway — the plastic fork shoved tasy, taking them out of this orbit and reinserting them Feeling Nothing (2015) many. Curated by Susanne Pfeffer, the museum’s direc- bellicose and fascistic energies of a collectively hallu- Courtesy of the Artist and into your Chinese takeout bag, the disposable head- into the dense materiality of her sculptures. Likewise, she tor, the show presented the work of a number of artists cinating nation at the tail end of the Bush era — and New Galerie, Paris phones handed to you by a distracted flight attendant models Hollywood’s forward projection in the imagined Photography by Swiss who imagine the human figure diverging from socially it reaped in box office revenue close to half a billion high on Xanax. futures of the science-fiction genre in many of her works. Institute or biologically determined destinies into sometimes dollars for its success in playing to the national mood. 44 — september / october 2016 45 — september / october 2016 were never meant to persist in their thingness. Before If you were to try and identify a definitive trait Consider Budor’s photographic suite When the Sick monstrous formations.