DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolutionary History of Nickel-Dependent Enzymes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolutionary History of Nickel-Dependent Enzymes Evolutionary History of Nickel-Dependent Enzymes: Implications for the Origins of Life. Reem Hallak Degree project in biology, Master of science (2 years), 2020 Examensarbete i biologi 60 hp till masterexamen, 2020 Biology Education Centre and Department of Earth Sciences, Palaeobiology, Uppsala University Supervisors: Aodhán Butler and Anna Neubeck External opponent: Brenda Irene Medina Jimenez Table of Contents ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................... 11 ▪ Brief Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 11 ▪ Operating Principle of HMMER ................................................................................................................. 11 ▪ Detailed Summary - Collecting Query Sequences ............................................................................ 13 a. From Published Study: ............................................................................................................................... 13 b. From Databases:........................................................................................................................................... 13 ▪ Searching for Homologs ................................................................................................................................ 14 a. Concatenating the Sequences: ............................................................................................................... 14 b. Setting Up the Sequence Databases: .................................................................................................. 14 c. Building the Profile HMMs + Conducting the Search:................................................................. 15 d. Visualizing the Results: ............................................................................................................................... 16 ▪ Gene Trees ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 a. Building the Trees: ....................................................................................................................................... 16 b. Annotation & Visualization of the Trees:........................................................................................... 16 c. Comparison of Tree Topologies: ......................................................................................................... 17 ▪ Ancestral State Reconstruction .................................................................................................................. 17 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................... 18 ▪ HMMER Results Summary ............................................................................................................................ 18 Page 1 of 68 ▪ Gene Trees + Ancestral State Reconstruction ................................................................................... 18 A. Redox Enzymes ................................................................................................................................................. 18 1. Co-methylating acetyl-CoA synthase (Enzymatic complex of ACS & CODH)............... 18 2. Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (Ni-CODH) ........................................................................... 20 3. Methyl-coenzyme M reductase (MCR) .............................................................................................. 22 4. Superoxide dismutase (Ni-SOD) ......................................................................................................... 23 5. Coenzyme F420 hydrogenase (FrhABG): A Group 3a Ni-Fe hydrogenase ......................... 25 6. Hydrogen:quinone oxidoreductase (or quinone-reactive Ni-Fe hydrogenase (Group 1)) 26 7. Ni-dependent hydrogenase (NiFeSe_Hases) .................................................................................. 28 B. Non-redox Enzymes ....................................................................................................................................... 30 1. Acireductone dioxygenase (Ni-ARD) ................................................................................................ 30 2. Glyoxalase I (GloI or GlxI) ....................................................................................................................... 32 3. Lactate racemase (LarA) .......................................................................................................................... 34 4. Urease............................................................................................................................................................... 35 ▪ Tree Comparison ............................................................................................................................................. 37 → CO-methylating acetyl-CoA synthase ........................................................................................... 38 → Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (Ni-CODH) ...................................................................... 38 ▪ Supplementary Files ......................................................................................................................................... 38 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................ 38 ▪ General Trends in Ancestral State Reconstruction Results ........................................................... 38 ▪ The Analogous Histories within Nickel Enzyme Groups: Single or Multiple Origins? ........ 39 Page 2 of 68 ▪ Selective Pressures: Nickel Famine or the Great Oxidation Event? ........................................... 40 ▪ The Odd Case of Methyl-coenzyme M Reductase ...................................................................... 41 ▪ Partial Genes in the LCA of Prokaryotes .......................................................................................... 42 ▪ Non-redox Enzymes: Convergent Evolution or LGT? ..................................................................... 42 ▪ Conflicting Tree Topologies: Evidence of Lateral Gene Transfer (LGT)? ................................ 43 ▪ Tree Comparison Results ........................................................................................................................ 45 → CO-methylating acetyl-CoA synthase ........................................................................................... 45 → Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (Ni-CODH) ...................................................................... 48 ▪ Implications for the Origin of Life .............................................................................................................. 50 → Why are nickel enzymes interesting for the origins of life?................................................... 50 → Implications from this study. ............................................................................................................... 51 → In what context do these new results matter? .......................................................................... 52 ▪ Inherent Assumptions of the Models....................................................................................................... 54 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................ 55 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 56 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 58 LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix A: Lophotrochozoa Hits .................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix B: Lingula reevi Hits ............................................................................................................................. 67 Appendix C: Occupancy Matrices ...................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix D: Gene Trees ....................................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix E: Ancestral State Reconstruction (ASR) Trees ...................................................................... 67 Page 3 of 68 Appendix F: Tanglegrams ....................................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix G: Reference Tree...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. III - Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A. Schmidt-Rhaesa PLATYHELMINTHES, NEMERTEA, AND “ASCHELMINTHES” A. Schmidt-Rhaesa University of Bielefeld, Germany Keywords: Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Gnathifera, Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, Rotifera, Acanthocephala, Cycliophora, Nemathelminthes, Gastrotricha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera Contents 1. Introduction 2. General Morphology 3. Platyhelminthes, the Flatworms 4. Nemertea (Nemertini), the Ribbon Worms 5. “Aschelminthes” 5.1. Gnathifera 5.1.1. Gnathostomulida 5.1.2. Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) 5.1.3. Rotifera 5.1.4. Acanthocephala 5.1.5. Cycliophora (Symbion pandora) 5.2. Nemathelminthes 5.2.1. Gastrotricha 5.2.2. Nematoda, the Roundworms 5.2.3. Nematomorpha, the Horsehair Worms 5.2.4. Priapulida 5.2.5. Kinorhyncha 5.2.6. Loricifera Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS This chapter provides information on several basal bilaterian groups: flatworms, nemerteans, Gnathifera,SAMPLE and Nemathelminthes. CHAPTERS These include species-rich taxa such as Nematoda and Platyhelminthes, and as taxa with few or even only one species, such as Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) and Cycliophora (Symbion pandora). All Acanthocephala and subgroups of Platyhelminthes and Nematoda, are parasites that often exhibit complex life cycles. Most of the taxa described are marine, but some have also invaded freshwater or the terrestrial environment. “Aschelminthes” are not a natural group, instead, two taxa have been recognized that were earlier summarized under this name. Gnathifera include taxa with a conspicuous jaw apparatus such as Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and Rotifera. Although they do not possess a jaw apparatus, Acanthocephala also belong to Gnathifera due to their epidermal structure. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Spongejaspis Sp-Associated Bacteria Producing Protease Inhibitor
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Spongejaspis sp-Associated Bacteria Producing Protease Inhibitor DEDE MAHDIYAH1,2, ARIS TRI WAHYUDI3, WIDANARNI3, HELMIA FARIDA4 1 Sari Mulia University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia 2Doctoral Programm, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia 3Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia 4Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia Correspondence to Dr. Dede Mahdiyah, Email :[email protected], Telp: +62-82250812565 ABSTRACT Background: Proteaseinhibitors are important in medicine, particularly in disabling proteases in the pathogenic processes of human diseases such as arthritis, cancer,HIV/AIDS and other infections. Sponges are excellent sources forbioactive compounds such as enzyme inhibitors, antiviral, antimicrobial. Aim: To explore sponge-associated bacteria as sources of protease inhibitors. Methods:This was an explorative descriptive study. Bacteria isolated from sponge Jaspis sp were screened using sea water complete and skim-milk double-layer plate. When the screening test positive, the activity of protease inhibitors was assessed using three substrates i.e proteinase-K, crude extract of protease (CEP) from Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonasaeruginosa, Enteropathogenic Escherichiacoli(EPEC) K11, and subtilisin. Optimum incubation time, temperature, and pH were determined to measure the activity ofthe protease inhibitors. Phenotypical characterization was performed using Gram and Microbact-kit. 16S-rRNA sequencing was done for identification. Results: Out of 136 isolates screened, three were positive for their potency as protease inhibitor producers, including oneGram-negative coccus and two Gram-positive cocci. The isolates showed protease inhibitor activity up to 90% toward the three substrates. The optimum time incubation toward three substratesranged 12-24 hours. The optimum temperatures for the three isolates were 30Co-60oC, 20o-30oC, and 30oC respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabarcoding Analysis on European Coastal Samples Reveals New
    1 A research a rticle submitted to Scientific Reports 2 3 Metabarcoding analysis on European coastal samples 4 reveals new molecular metazoan diversity 5 6 David López -Escardó 1, Jordi Paps 2, Colomban de Vargas 3,4 , Ramon Massana 5, Iñaki 7 Ruiz -Trillo 1,6,7* , Javier del Campo 1,8* 8 Supplementary Figure Legends and Table s 9 Fig. S 1: Box plot distribution of relative metazoan abundance compar ed with all 10 eukaryotes. Relative abundance of metazoans compared to all eukaryotes in (a) 11 different oxic pelagic fractions, (b) different sites and in ( c) different depths. Note that 12 data is provided from just one sample in the anoxic sediments. 13 Fig. S2: Rarefaction curves . Rarefaction curves calculated with vegan from the 14 samples divided (a) by template (RNA or DNA) or (b) by env ironment keepig as well 15 divided the samples from RNA ( discontinuous line) or DNA ( continuous line ). Both 16 plots show the rarefaction curve of all the samples. 17 Fig. S3: Jackknife clustering analysis of phylogenetic composition of the samples . 18 The chart repr esents the relative abundance within metazoan phyla in each sample. 19 Samples from extracellular DNA and the ones with less than 100 reads (DNA+RNA) 20 were removed from the analysis. Sample characteristics are expressed in colors. On 21 the right site there is th e legend. RNA and DNA are expressed in white and black 22 respectively. Picoplanktonic, nanoplanktonic, micromesoplanktonic samples and the 23 samples from the sediments are representedwith yellow, green, dark red and purple 24 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Pathways of Photoreceptors by Paul Nethercott
    The Evolutionary Pathways Of Photoreceptors By Paul Nethercott August 2014 www.CreationismOnline.com www.wikipedia.com Evolution Of Photoreceptors And Eyes Sorted By Phyletic Group Phylum Meaning Common name Eyes Species Acanthocephala Thorny headed worms Thorny‐headed worms None 756 Acoelomorpha Without gut Acoels None 1 Annelida Little ring Segmented worms Ocelli, Compound Eyes 17,000 Arthropoda Jointed foot Arthropods Ocelli, Compound Eyes 1,134,000 Brachiopoda Arm foot Lamp shells None 400 Bryozoa Moss animals Moss animals, sea mats None 5,000 Chaetognatha Longhair jaw Arrow worms Compound Eyes 100 Chordata With a cord Chordates Single Lense 100,000 Cnidaria Stinging nettle Coelenterates Ocelli, Single Lense 11,000 Ctenophora Comb bearer Comb jellies None 100 Cycliophora Wheel carrying Symbion None 3 Echinodermata Spiny skin Echinoderms Ocelli 7,000 Entoprocta Inside anus Goblet worm Ocelli 150 Gastrotricha Hair stomach Meiofauna Ocelli 690 Gnathostomulida Jaw orifice Jaw worms None 100 Hemichordata Half cord Acorn worms None 100 Kinorhyncha Motion snout Mud dragons Ocelli 150 Loricifera Corset bearer Brush heads None 122 Micrognathozoa Tiny jaw animals — None 1 Mollusca Soft Mollusks Ocelli 112,000 Nematoda Thread like Round worms Ocelli 100,000 Nematomorpha Thread form Horsehair worms None 320 Nemertea A sea nymph Ribbon worms Ocelli 1,200 Onychophora Claw bearer Velvet worms Ocelli 200 Orthonectida Straight swim None 20 Phoronida Zeus's mistress Horseshoe worms None 11 Placozoa Plate animals None 1 Platyhelminthes Flat worms Flat
    [Show full text]
  • Sulphur Oxidising Bacteria in Mangrove Ecosystem: a Review
    Vol. 13(29), pp. 2897-2907, 16 July, 2014 DOI: 10.5897/AJB2013.13327 Article Number: D2A2A3546087 ISSN 1684-5315 African Journal of Biotechnology Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB Review Sulphur oxidising bacteria in mangrove ecosystem: A review B. C. Behera1, R. R. Mishra2, S. K. Dutta3 and H. N. Thatoi4* 1Department of Biotechnology, North Odisha University, Baripada -757003, Odisha, India. 2Department of Biotechnology, MITS School of Biotechnology, Bhubaneswar-751024, Odisha, India. 3Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560012, India. 4Department of Biotechnology, College of Engineering and Technology, Biju Pattnaik University of Technology, Bhubaneswar -751003, Odisha, India. Received 29 September, 2013; Accepted 16 June, 2014 Mangrove soils are anoxic, sulphidic and variable since their chemistry is regulated by a variety of factors such as texture, tidal range and elevation, redox state, bioturbation intensity, forest type, temperature and rainfall. Sulphur-oxidizing bacteria such as photoautotrophs, chemolithotrophs and heterotrophs play an important role in the mangrove environment for the oxidation of the toxic sulphide produced by sulphur reducing bacteria and act as a key driving force behind all sulphur transformations in the mangrove ecosystem which is most essential to maintain the sulphur cycle as well as eco health. These overviews summarizes the current state of knowledge of diversity and important biotechnological contributions of these microorganisms in agriculture, bio fertility, reduction of environmental pollution, maintenance of the productivity of ecosystems and also highlight areas in which further research is needed to increase our basic understanding of physiology, genomics and proteomics of these microorganisms which is most essential.
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Microbe Interactions in Octocoral Holobionts - Recent Advances and Perspectives Jeroen A
    van de Water et al. Microbiome (2018) 6:64 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0431-6 REVIEW Open Access Host-microbe interactions in octocoral holobionts - recent advances and perspectives Jeroen A. J. M. van de Water* , Denis Allemand and Christine Ferrier-Pagès Abstract Octocorals are one of the most ubiquitous benthic organisms in marine ecosystems from the shallow tropics to the Antarctic deep sea, providing habitat for numerous organisms as well as ecosystem services for humans. In contrast to the holobionts of reef-building scleractinian corals, the holobionts of octocorals have received relatively little attention, despite the devastating effects of disease outbreaks on many populations. Recent advances have shown that octocorals possess remarkably stable bacterial communities on geographical and temporal scales as well as under environmental stress. This may be the result of their high capacity to regulate their microbiome through the production of antimicrobial and quorum-sensing interfering compounds. Despite decades of research relating to octocoral-microbe interactions, a synthesis of this expanding field has not been conducted to date. We therefore provide an urgently needed review on our current knowledge about octocoral holobionts. Specifically, we briefly introduce the ecological role of octocorals and the concept of holobiont before providing detailed overviews of (I) the symbiosis between octocorals and the algal symbiont Symbiodinium; (II) the main fungal, viral, and bacterial taxa associated with octocorals; (III) the dominance of the microbial assemblages by a few microbial species, the stability of these associations, and their evolutionary history with the host organism; (IV) octocoral diseases; (V) how octocorals use their immune system to fight pathogens; (VI) microbiome regulation by the octocoral and its associated microbes; and (VII) the discovery of natural products with microbiome regulatory activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Methods Assessing the Root of Bilaterian Animals with Scalable
    Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on 10 November 2009 Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods Andreas Hejnol, Matthias Obst, Alexandros Stamatakis, Michael Ott, Greg W. Rouse, Gregory D. Edgecombe, Pedro Martinez, Jaume Baguñà, Xavier Bailly, Ulf Jondelius, Matthias Wiens, Werner E. G. Müller, Elaine Seaver, Ward C. Wheeler, Mark Q. Martindale, Gonzalo Giribet and Casey W. Dunn Proc. R. Soc. B 2009 276, 4261-4270 first published online 16 September 2009 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0896 Supplementary data "Data Supplement" http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/suppl/2009/09/15/rspb.2009.0896.DC1.h tml References This article cites 40 articles, 6 of which can be accessed free http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/276/1677/4261.full.html#ref-list-1 Subject collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections taxonomy and systematics (160 articles) bioinformatics (66 articles) evolution (1169 articles) Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top Email alerting service right-hand corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Proc. R. Soc. B go to: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions This journal is © 2009 The Royal Society Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on 10 November 2009 Proc. R. Soc. B (2009) 276, 4261–4270 doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0896 Published online 16 September 2009 Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods Andreas Hejnol1,*, Matthias Obst2, Alexandros Stamatakis3, Michael Ott3,GregW.Rouse4, Gregory D. Edgecombe5, Pedro Martinez6, Jaume Bagun˜ a` 6, Xavier Bailly7, Ulf Jondelius8, Matthias Wiens9, Werner E.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Phylogeny and the Ancestry of Bilaterians: Inferences from Morphology and 18S Rdna Gene Sequences
    EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 3:3, 170–205 (2001) Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences Kevin J. Peterson and Douglas J. Eernisse* Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, USA; and *Department of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton CA 92834-6850, USA *Author for correspondence (email: [email protected]) SUMMARY Insight into the origin and early evolution of the and protostomes, with ctenophores the bilaterian sister- animal phyla requires an understanding of how animal group, whereas 18S rDNA suggests that the root is within the groups are related to one another. Thus, we set out to explore Lophotrochozoa with acoel flatworms and gnathostomulids animal phylogeny by analyzing with maximum parsimony 138 as basal bilaterians, and with cnidarians the bilaterian sister- morphological characters from 40 metazoan groups, and 304 group. We suggest that this basal position of acoels and gna- 18S rDNA sequences, both separately and together. Both thostomulids is artifactal because for 1000 replicate phyloge- types of data agree that arthropods are not closely related to netic analyses with one random sequence as outgroup, the annelids: the former group with nematodes and other molting majority root with an acoel flatworm or gnathostomulid as the animals (Ecdysozoa), and the latter group with molluscs and basal ingroup lineage. When these problematic taxa are elim- other taxa with spiral cleavage. Furthermore, neither brachi- inated from the matrix, the combined analysis suggests that opods nor chaetognaths group with deuterostomes; brachiopods the root lies between the deuterostomes and protostomes, are allied with the molluscs and annelids (Lophotrochozoa), and Ctenophora is the bilaterian sister-group.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrastructural Studies on the Blue-Green Algal Symbiont in Korschikoff
    ULTRASTRUCTURAL STUDIES ON THE BLUE-GREEN ALGAL SYMBIONT IN CYANOPHORA PARADOXA KORSCHIKOFF WILLIAM T. HALL, Ph.D., and GEORGE CLAUS, D.Se. From The Rockefeller Institute and New York University Medical Center, New York ABSTRACT Studies conducted on the ultrastructurc of Cyanophoraparadoxa Korschikoff (a cryptomonad) have shown that its intracellular symbiont is closely related to unicellular blue-green algae. Due to its peculiar habitat, the intracellular symbiont lacks the characteristic cyanophyccan double-layered cell wall, but is surrounded by a thin protoplasmic membrane. The proto- plasm itself is differentiated into a lamellated chromatoplasm containing photosynthetic pigments, polyphosphate granules, and possible oil droplets, and a non-lamellar centro- plasm with a large centrally located electron-opaque body surrounded by a fibril-containing halo. 2-his halo-central body complex may be nuclear in nature. Binary fission of the or- ganism is described. Since this cyanelle has not yet been classified, we name it Cyano- cyta korschikofftana nov. gen. nov. sp.; and because of its structural peculiarities, we find it necessary to create a new family for it, Cyanocytaceae, in the order Chroococcales. INTRODUCTION With the term "Syncyanosen," Pascher (1914) that organism found within the flagellate Cyano- described the general phenomenon of a blue-green phora paradoxa Korschikoff (Fig. 1). Although this alga living symbiotically with a colorless protist. intracellular symbiont is one of the most In his paper, he reported cases in which the cyano- thoroughly studied of the cyanelles ("Cyanellen"-- phyte was attached on the external surface of the Pascher, 1929), its nature still remains a paradox. host organism. In 1924, Korschikoff published a Investigators since Korschikoff point out the great description of a flagellate containing in its proto- similarity of the organism to blue-green algae.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Pharmacognosy Semester(S) in Which the II Module Is Taught Person Responsible for the Prof
    MODULE 5 Module name Natural Medicine Module level, if Bachelor applicable Code, if applicable 336N1122 Subtitle, if applicable - Courses, if applicable Marine Pharmacognosy Semester(s) in which the II module is taught Person responsible for the Prof. Dr. Gemini Alam, Apt module Prof. Dr. Gemini Alam, Apt Lecturer Dr. rer-nat, Elmi Nurhaidah Zainuddin, DES. Language Bahasa Compulsory in semester II for Bachelor degree in Relation curriculum Pharmacy Lectures (2 hours) Type of teaching, contact Group Discussions/Group Discussions/Tutorial (1 hr) hours Practical Sessions (3 hours) Contact hours: 16 weeks x 3 hours Workload Independent study: 15 weeks x 3 hours Practical sessions: 15 weeks x 3 hours Credit points 2 SKS OR 3.4 CP (ECTS) Requirements according Attendance policy: Absence greater than 20% of the to the examination material are not eligible for final and/or practical exam. regulations Recommended Completion of modules: prerequisites After the completion of this module, participants will gain knowledge, skill and competence as follows: Knowledge: Participants will be able to: • Be able to describe and identify natural product including bacterial symbiont, plants, animal from marines Module • Be able to describe the synthesis of objective/intended secondary metabolites from marine Learning outcomes organisme • Be able to describe how the chemichal pattern primary and secondary metabolites from marine organisme and their medicinal purposes. Skill: • Participant will be able to present their opinion/argument sistematically based
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Symbion Pandora and S. Americanus
    Helgol Mar Res (2010) 64:257–262 DOI 10.1007/s10152-010-0204-5 SHORT COMMUNICATION External morphology of the cycliophoran dwarf male: a comparative study of Symbion pandora and S. americanus Ricardo Cardoso Neves • Marina Ribeiro da Cunha • Peter Funch • Andreas Wanninger • Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen Received: 29 January 2010 / Revised: 26 April 2010 / Accepted: 27 April 2010 / Published online: 15 May 2010 Ó Springer-Verlag and AWI 2010 Abstract Cycliophora is a recently described phylum to pouch that encloses the penis. We compare our findings on which only two species have been assigned so far, Symbion both Symbion species with the data currently available on pandora and S. americanus. The cycliophoran life cycle is other metazoan dwarf males. complex and alternates between asexual and sexual stages. Although not recognized as an entirely independent free- Keywords Sexual reproduction Á Life cycle Á swimming stage when the phylum was first described, the Scanning electron microscopy Á Spiralia Á Lophotrochozoa Á dwarf male has a remarkably complex bodyplan albeit its Cycliophora very small size (approx. 30–40 lm in length). Aiming to increase the knowledge on the gross morphology of the cycliophoran dwarf male, specimens from S. pandora and Introduction S. americanus were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. In both species, anterior and ventral ciliated Cycliophora is a metazoan phylum recently erected to fields, as well as paired lateral sensorial organs, were accommodate minute marine invertebrates that live com- identified, thus confirming previous observations. How- mensally on clawed lobsters. So far, only two species have ever, new details are described herein such as the penial been described, Symbion pandora Funch and Kristensen, 1995 and Symbion americanus Obst, Funch & Kristensen, 2006, which live on the mouthparts of the Norwegian lobster Communicated by H.-D.
    [Show full text]
  • Systema Naturae. the Classification of Living Organisms
    Systema Naturae. The classification of living organisms. c Alexey B. Shipunov v. 5.601 (June 26, 2007) Preface Most of researches agree that kingdom-level classification of living things needs the special rules and principles. Two approaches are possible: (a) tree- based, Hennigian approach will look for main dichotomies inside so-called “Tree of Life”; and (b) space-based, Linnaean approach will look for the key differences inside “Natural System” multidimensional “cloud”. Despite of clear advantages of tree-like approach (easy to develop rules and algorithms; trees are self-explaining), in many cases the space-based approach is still prefer- able, because it let us to summarize any kinds of taxonomically related da- ta and to compare different classifications quite easily. This approach also lead us to four-kingdom classification, but with different groups: Monera, Protista, Vegetabilia and Animalia, which represent different steps of in- creased complexity of living things, from simple prokaryotic cell to compound Nature Precedings : doi:10.1038/npre.2007.241.2 Posted 16 Aug 2007 eukaryotic cell and further to tissue/organ cell systems. The classification Only recent taxa. Viruses are not included. Abbreviations: incertae sedis (i.s.); pro parte (p.p.); sensu lato (s.l.); sedis mutabilis (sed.m.); sedis possi- bilis (sed.poss.); sensu stricto (s.str.); status mutabilis (stat.m.); quotes for “environmental” groups; asterisk for paraphyletic* taxa. 1 Regnum Monera Superphylum Archebacteria Phylum 1. Archebacteria Classis 1(1). Euryarcheota 1 2(2). Nanoarchaeota 3(3). Crenarchaeota 2 Superphylum Bacteria 3 Phylum 2. Firmicutes 4 Classis 1(4). Thermotogae sed.m. 2(5).
    [Show full text]