DOCSLIB.ORG

FAA Order 8130.2H, February 4, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FAA Order 8130.2H, February 4, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADM INISTRATION ORDER 8130.2H 02/04/2015 National Policy SUBJ: Airworthiness Certification of Products and Articles This order establishes procedures for accomplishing original and recurrent airworthiness certification ofaircraft and related products and articles. The procedures contained in this order apply to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) manufacturing aviation safety inspectors (ASI), to FAA airworthiness AS Is, and to private persons or organizations delegated authority to issue airworthiness certificates and related approvals. Suggestions for improvement of this order may be submitted using the FAA Office of Aviation Safety (AVS) directive feedback system at http://avsdfs.avs.faa.gov/default.aspx, or FAA Form 1320-19, Directive Feedback Information, found in appendix I to this order. D G!JD Cf1 · ~ David Hempe Manager, Design, Manufacturing, & Airworthiness Division Aircraft Certification Service Distribution: Electronic Initiated By: AIR-1 00 02/04/2015 8130.2H Table of Contents Paragraph Page Chapter 1. Introduction 100. Purpose of This Order .............................................................................. 1-1 101. Audience .................................................................................................. 1-1 102. Where Can I Find This Order .................................................................. 1-1 103. Explanation of Policy Changes ................................................................ 1-1 104. Cancellation ............................................................................................. 1-1 105. Effective Date .......................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2. General Policies and Procedures Section 1. General Information 200. Definition of the Term “Airworthy” for U.S. Type-Certificated Aircraft ..................................................................................................... 2-1 201. Representatives of the FAA Authorized To Issue Airworthiness Certificates and Related Approvals ......................................................... 2-1 202. Responsibilities of FAA ASIs and Designees ......................................... 2-2 203. Possession and Display of Airworthiness Certificates ............................. 2-2 204. Aircraft Registration ................................................................................ 2-3 205. Size of Aircraft Nationality and Registration Marks ............................... 2-3 206. Display of Nationality and Registration Marks on Antique and Antique Replica Aircraft ................................................................... 2-3 207. Original and Replacement Aircraft Identification Plates ......................... 2-4 208. Public Aircraft Operations ....................................................................... 2-6 209. Aircraft Being Removed From a Continuous Maintenance System ........ 2-6 210. Operation of Civil Aircraft With a Door Open or Removed for Parachuting, Skydiving, or Other Special Operations ............................. 2-6 211. Banner Towing......................................................................................... 2-7 212 Former Military Aircraft .......................................................................... 2-8 213. Aircraft Equipped With Explosive Devices or Jettisonable Stores ......... 2-9 214. Reserved ................................................................................................. 2-10 Section 2. Airworthiness Certificates 215. General ................................................................................................... 2-10 216. Classification and Category of Airworthiness Certificates .................... 2-10 217. Replacement, Exchange, or Amendment of Airworthiness Certificates ............................................................................................. 2-10 218. Surrendered Airworthiness Certificate .................................................. 2-12 219. Aircraft Model Change .......................................................................... 2-13 ii 02/04/2015 8130.2H Table of Contents (Continued) Paragraph Page 220. Recording of Conformity Inspections .................................................... 2-13 221. Airworthiness Certification of Manned Free Balloons .......................... 2-13 222.-223. Reserved ................................................................................................. 2-14 Section 3. Initial or Subsequent Issuance of Airworthiness Certificates (Original/Recurrent) or Related Approvals 224. General ................................................................................................... 2-14 225. Airworthiness Certification .................................................................... 2-15 226. Exceptions .............................................................................................. 2-15 227. Recording of Conformity Inspections .................................................... 2-15 228. Eligibility and Evaluation of U.S. Military Surplus Flight Safety-Critical Aircraft Parts (Articles) (FSCAP), Engines, and Propellers ........................................................................................ 2-16 Figure 2-1. Sample Aeronautical Center Form 8050-64, Assignment of Special Registration Numbers ....................................... 2-26 Figure 2-2. Sample Response Letter Regarding Identification Plates .. 2-27 Figure 2-3. Sample Limitations for the Operation of an Aircraft With a Door Removed ........................................................................... 2-28 Figure 2-4. Sample FAA Form 8100-1, Conformity Inspection Record (Face Side Only) ........................................................................ 2-30 Chapter 3. Standard Airworthiness Certification Section 1. General Information 300. General ..................................................................................................... 3-1 301. Standard Airworthiness Certificate .......................................................... 3-1 302. Application for Airworthiness Certificate ............................................... 3-2 303. Statement of Conformity .......................................................................... 3-2 304. Determining Conformity .......................................................................... 3-2 305. Basic Eligibility Requirements ................................................................ 3-3 306. Certification Procedures........................................................................... 3-3 307.-308. Reserved ................................................................................................... 3-5 Section 2. New Aircraft 309. General ..................................................................................................... 3-6 310. Certification Procedures........................................................................... 3-6 311. Aircraft Manufactured Under a TC (Without an FAA Production Approval) ................................................................................................. 3-6 312. Aircraft Manufactured Under a PC .......................................................... 3-6 313. Airworthiness Certification of Very Light Aircraft (VLA) ..................... 3-7 iii 02/04/2015 8130.2H Table of Contents (Continued) Paragraph Page 314. Aircraft Manufactured in a Bilateral Country .......................................... 3-7 315. New Aircraft Manufactured Under the Provisions of § 21.6(b) .............. 3-7 316.-318. Reserved ................................................................................................. 3-12 Section 3. Used Aircraft and Surplus Aircraft of the U.S. Armed Forces 319. General ................................................................................................... 3-13 320. Certification Procedures......................................................................... 3-13 321. Conformity Determination ..................................................................... 3-13 322. Flight Testing ......................................................................................... 3-14 323. Issuance of Standard Airworthiness Certificates Under § 21.183(d)—Used Aircraft and Surplus Aircraft of the U.S. Armed Forces ................................................................................. 3-14 324. Screening of Surplus Military Aircraft .................................................. 3-18 325. State of Conformity—Military Aircraft (FAA Form 8130-31) ............. 3-20 326. Issuance of Standard Airworthiness Certificates, Surplus Military Aircraft........................................................................ 3-20 327. Certification Requirements (Applicant) ................................................. 3-21 328. Certification Procedures......................................................................... 3-22 329. Examples of Forms ................................................................................ 3-23 Figure 3-1. Sample FAA Form 8100-2, Standard Airworthiness Certificate, New Aircraft (Face Side) .................................................... 3-23 Figure 3-2. Sample FAA Form 8100-2, Standard Airworthiness Certificate, Aircraft Assembled from Spare and Surplus Products and Articles ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Luftwaffe Wasn't Alone
    PIONEER JETS OF WORLD WAR II THE LUFTWAFFE WASN’T ALONE BY BARRETT TILLMAN he history of technology is replete with Heinkel, which absorbed some Junkers engineers. Each fac tory a concept called “multiple independent opted for axial compressors. Ohain and Whittle, however, discovery.” Examples are the incandes- independently pursued centrifugal designs, and both encoun- cent lightbulb by the American inventor tered problems, even though both were ultimately successful. Thomas Edison and the British inventor Ohain's design powered the Heinkel He 178, the world's first Joseph Swan in 1879, and the computer by jet airplane, flown in August 1939. Whittle, less successful in Briton Alan Turing and Polish-American finding industrial support, did not fly his own engine until Emil Post in 1936. May 1941, when it powered Britain's first jet airplane: the TDuring the 1930s, on opposite sides of the English Chan- Gloster E.28/39. Even so, he could not manufacture his sub- nel, two gifted aviation designers worked toward the same sequent designs, which the Air Ministry handed off to Rover, goal. Royal Air Force (RAF) Pilot Officer Frank Whittle, a a car company, and subsequently to another auto and piston 23-year-old prodigy, envisioned a gas-turbine engine that aero-engine manufacturer: Rolls-Royce. might surpass the most powerful piston designs, and patented Ohain’s work detoured in 1942 with a dead-end diagonal his idea in 1930. centrifugal compressor. As Dr. Hallion notes, however, “Whit- Slightly later, after flying gliders and tle’s designs greatly influenced American savoring their smooth, vibration-free “Axial-flow engines turbojet development—a General Electric– flight, German physicist Hans von Ohain— were more difficult built derivative of a Whittle design powered who had earned a doctorate in 1935— to perfect but America's first jet airplane, the Bell XP-59A became intrigued with a propeller-less gas- produced more Airacomet, in October 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Bell 429 Product Specifications
    BELL 429 SPECIFICATIONS BELL 429 SPECIFICATIONS Publisher’s Notice The information herein is general in nature and may vary with conditions. Individuals using this information must exercise their independent judgment in evaluating product selection and determining product appropriateness for their particular purpose and requirements. For performance data and operating limitations for any specific mission, reference must be made to the approved flight manual. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. makes no representations or warranties, either expressed or implied, including without limitation any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to the information set forth herein or the product(s) and service(s) to which the information refers. Accordingly, Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. will not be responsible for damages (of any kind or nature, including incidental, direct, indirect, or consequential damages) resulting from the use of or reliance on this information. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. reserves the right to change product designs and specifications without notice. © 2019 Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. All registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners. FEBRUARY 2019 © 2019 Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. Specifications subject to change without notice. i BELL 429 SPECIFICATIONS Table of Contents Bell 429 ..................................................................................................................................1 Bell 429 Specification Summary (U.S. Units) ........................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Leading the Charge We Put TBM 940 Speedster Through Its Paces for NBAA
    15-21 October 2019 I flightglobal.com FLIGHT TEST Leading the charge We put TBM 940 speedster through its paces for NBAA £3.90 Wow, how? ACES high 42 Questions remain over defunct US Air Force boosts Collins Icelandic carrier’s comeback 13 with ejection seat deal 20 9 770015 371310 FLIGHT TEST Power of one Turboprop-single family has been a market success since launch in 1988, amassing sales of more than 900 units across three variants Daher has delivered a compelling offer for owner-flyers, with a range of enhancements on the TBM 940 providing an edge over the piston-twin segment. We put it through its paces MICHAEL GERZANICS POMPANO BEACH have allowed single-engined designs to make to be efficient. Airspace congestion, however, inroads into the twin-turbine segment. can make reaching optimum altitudes for jets he single-engined turboprop market The growth of the single-engined turbo- problematic, so their real-world range can be is populated by numerous aircraft of prop segment is based on the near-bulletproof shorter. Jets also have higher direct operating varying configurations. In broad reliability and scalability of the PT6 family. costs, however. T strokes, it can be broken down into This paradigm shift from piston-twins to tur- Runway performance and training require- two segments: fast, low-winged aircraft and bine-singles is conceptually on par with ex- ments are also two factors that fuel the single- slower, more spacious high-winged designs. tended twin-engine operations authorisations engined turboprop segment, because runway In the West, these diverse offerings share a all but killing off three- and four-engined civil length for turboprops is shorter than that single critical component – their engine.
    [Show full text]
  • E. Runway Length Analysis
    JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012 E. Runway Length Analysis This appendix describes the runway length analysis conducted for the Airport. Runway 7-25, the Airport’s primary runway, has a length of 8,700 feet and the existing crosswind runway (Runway 12-30) has a length of 3,207 feet. A runway length analysis was conducted to determine if additional runway length is required to meet the needs of aircraft forecasted to operate at the Airport through the planning period. The analysis was conducted according to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance contained in Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design. The runway length analysis set forth in AC 150/5325-4B relates to both arrivals and departures, although departures typically require more runway length. Runway length requirements were determined separately for Runway 7-25 and Runway 12-30. E.1 Primary Runway Length Requirements According to AC 150/5325-4B, the design objective for the primary runway is to provide a runway length for all aircraft without causing operational weight restrictions. The methodology used to determine required runway lengths is based on the MTOW of the aircraft types to be evaluated, which are grouped into the following categories: Small aircraft (MTOW of 12,500 pounds or less) – Aircraft in this category range in size from ultralight aircraft to small turboprop aircraft. Within this category, aircraft are broken out by approach speeds (less than 30 knots, at least 30 knots but less than 50 knots, and more than 50 knots). Aircraft with approach speeds of more than 50 knots are further broken out by passenger seat capacity (less than 10 passenger seats and 10 or more passenger seats).
    [Show full text]
  • Bell Uh-1 Iroquois
    BELL UH-1 IROQUOIS UH-1 SERVICE Manufacturer: Bell Helicopter Corp. of Bell Aircraft Corp., Fort Worth, Texas, USA (In 1960, became Bell Helicopter Co., Textron Corp.) (In 1976, became Bell Helicopter Textron, Textron Inc.) Models: Model 204, 205, 208, 210, 211, 212, 214, 412, 450, 533, 577 Designations: H-1 (UH-1); H-40, H-48, HU-1, CH-118 / CH-135 / CH-146 (CAF) Names: Iroquois; Huey (unofficial), Venom & Super Huey (UH-1Y) First official flight: XH-40 22/10/1956 Factory production period: 1955 – 1987 (military) 1963 – present (civil) Primary service period: 1959 – 1980’s Last official flight: - - UH-1 VARIANTS 1956 Model 204 XH-40 3 1956 Model 204 YH-40 6 Total: 00009 1959 Model 204 HU-1A (UH-1A) 182 1960 Model 204 YHU-1B (YUH-1B) 4 1961 Model 204 HU-1B (UH-1B) 1030 1965 Model 204 UH-1C 755 Total: 01971 1961 Model 205 YHU-1D (YUH-1D) 7 1963 Model 205 UH-1D 2010 Total: 02017 1963 Model 204 UH-1E 209 1964 Model 204 UH-1F 120 1967 Model 204 TH-1F 26 Total: 00355 1967 Model 205 UH-1H 5648 1968 Model 205 CUH-1H 10 1971 Model 205 HH-1H 30 Total: 05688 1969 Model 204 HH-1K 27 1969 Model 204 TH-1L 90 1968 Model 204 UH-1L 8 Total: 00125 1969 Model 212 UH-1N 288 1971 Model 212 CUH-1N 50 1974 Model 212 VH-1N 6 Total: 00344 2006 Model 450 UH-1Y 135 Total: 00135 1962 Model 204 Model 204 80 1968 Model 205 Model 205 332 1969 Model 212 Model 212 917 1970 Model 214 Model 214 509 1981 Model 412 Model 412 1026 Total: 02864 Total: 13508 Foreign built – Indonesia: 1986 Model 412 NBell 412 30 Total: 00030 Foreign built – Italy: 1961 Model 204 Model AB.204
    [Show full text]
  • CF-18 Fighter Demonstration Manual
    FIGHTER DEMONSTRATION MANUAL Version 4.0 Issued under the Authority of Commander 1 Canadian Air Division Custodian: OC FSET March 2019 Endorsed by: Approved by: Recoverable Signature Recoverable Signature X A DComd FG Col Luc Girou... X BGen I.H. Huddleston MGen J.H.C Drouin Deputy Commander Force Generation Commander 1 Canadian Air Division Signed by: GIROUARD, LUC 607 Signed by: BOYLE, SEAN 627 Fighter Demonstration Manual Record of Amendments Amend DATE DETAILS DONE BY # 0 XX Mar 19 Capt Thys R.G.T. This document is issued on the authority of the OC Fighter Standards and Evaluation Team (FSET) and contains information specific to the employment and role of the Fighter Demonstration Team. Inquiries and suggestions for changes shall be forwarded through Special Events Coord and OC FSET for review and submission to SSO Fighters for the approval of the Commander 1 Canadian Air Division. Table of Contents FIGHTER DEMONSTRATION MANUAL .................................................... 1 Chapter 1: PREPARATION ........................................................................ 8 101. TEAM SELECTION ........................................................... 8 102. AIRSHOW ROUTINE ........................................................ 9 103. FIGHTER DEMONSTRATION TRAINING ........................ 9 104. ACCEPTANCE SHOW ...................................................... 9 Chapter 2: OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................... 11 201. CONFIGURATION .......................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • This Annex to EASA TCDS IM.A.636 Was Created to Publish Selected
    Explanatory Note to TCDS No.: EASA.IM.A.636 – M3000 Date: 06/03/2020 Issue: 03 This annex to EASA TCDS IM.A.636 was created to publish selected special conditions / deviations / equivalent safety findings that are part of the applicable certification basis: CONTENTS B-02 High Speed Characteristics 2 B-52 Human Factor – Integrated Avionics Systems 12 C-03 Speed Margin 18 C-04 Yawing Manoeuvre 21 C-106 Emergency landing dynamic conditions - HIC 22 C-107 Emergency landing dynamic conditions - lumbar loads 24 D-01 Take-off Warning System 26 D-02 Extension and Retraction Systems 27 D-03 Wheels 28 D-04 Brakes and Braking System 29 D-05 Doors / Canopy 32 D-06 Bird Strike 35 D-102 Canopy Fracturing System 36 D-103 Ejection Seats 44 D-105 Emergency Evacuation Provisions 52 D-106 Fire Extinguisher 53 D-107 Cabin Pressure Altitude Warning Indication 54 E-101 Digital Electronic engine/propeller control PMU 55 E-114 Suction Defuel 56 E-115 Single Power Control Lever 57 E-116 Digital Propeller Tachometer and Markings 58 E-117 Digital Propeller Tachometer and Markings 59 F-02 Hydraulic System 60 F-52 Protection from Effects of HIRF 61 F-54 Protection from Effects of Lightning Strike, Indirect Effects 65 F-101 On Board Oxygen Generator System - OBOGS 66 F-103 Electronic Standby Direction Indicator (Compass) 71 F-104 HUD Certification 72 ESF 23.841-01 Cabin rate of climb indicator removal 74 ESF 23.1555 Use of Yellow and Black Emergency Markings 75 Disclaimer – This document is not exhaustive and it will be updated gradually.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Development of Ejection Seat Mechanism in Aircraft
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8 Issue-11, September 2019 Design and Development of Ejection Seat Mechanism in Aircraft R. Rajaprasanna, A. Rajendra Prasad, T. Vignesh, M. C. Anand Chakaravarthi, Priyadarshi Dutt appropriate to fly an air ship. For moving of seats it need high Abstract: This research manages the discharge framework that fuel and cost of such carriers would be essentially astronomic. can be actualized in a common air ship. It is significant for a In the contender flying machines at the hour of launch the flying machine to have a launch situate in the event that the plane shade is first opened and the discharge seat is rescued with the meets a mishap in a fight or during experimental drill and the pilot, this framework can be additionally utilized in the pilot needs to rescue to spare their life. The component includes common plane to rescue the pilot, yet as by the common lifting of the pilot to a protected good ways from the air ship and after that sending the parachute. As there is increment in air airplane laws, the pilot is in charge of the security of the traffic, this discharge framework gives extra security measures to travelers. Simultaneously the travelers can't be catapulted like the life of travelers. By this strategy alongside the pilot, the group in the contender planes since we can't open the top of the individuals and the travelers can be spared. This discharge plane and can't discharge huge number of travelers one after framework comprises of an exceptionally made ejector cushion, another.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Aircraft-Based Observations
    Guide to Aircraft-based Observations 2017 edition WEATHER CLIMATE WATER CLIMATE WEATHER WMO-No. 1200 Guide to Aircraft-based Observations 2017 edition WMO-No. 1200 EDITORIAL NOTE METEOTERM, the WMO terminology database, may be consulted at http://public.wmo.int/en/ resources/meteoterm. Readers who copy hyperlinks by selecting them in the text should be aware that additional spaces may appear immediately following http://, https://, ftp://, mailto:, and after slashes (/), dashes (-), periods (.) and unbroken sequences of characters (letters and numbers). These spaces should be removed from the pasted URL. The correct URL is displayed when hovering over the link or when clicking on the link and then copying it from the browser. WMO-No. 1200 © World Meteorological Organization, 2017 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 03 P.O. Box 2300 Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 81 17 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-92-63-11200-2 NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ejection Seat Mechanism in Civil Aircraft Richard Johnson Abstract—This Paper Deals with the Ejection System That Can Be Implemented in a Civil Aircraft
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 10, October-2012 1 ISSN 2229-5518 Ejection Seat Mechanism in Civil Aircraft Richard Johnson Abstract—this paper deals with the ejection system that can be implemented in a civil aircraft. It is important for an aircraft to have an ejection seat in case the plane meets an accident in a battle or during test flight and the pilot has to bail out to save his or her life. The mechanism involves lifting of the pilot to a safe distance away from the aircraft and then deploying the parachute. As there is increase in air traffic, this ejection system provides additional safety measures to the life of passengers. By this method along with the pilot, the crew members and the passengers can be saved. This ejection system consists of a specially made ejector pad, track system and parachute. The ejection system is governed by a timing sensor which ensures that the movement of the passenger seat take place in equal interval of time to avoid collision between two consecutive seats. Index Terms- Bail, ejector pad, track system, ejection, hydraulic, propulsion, stability. —————————— —————————— empty weight. Instead of high propulsive power, simple 1 INTRODUCTION spring mechanism is implemented. To avoid the collisions the 1.1 Problem statement timing system, sequence and equal interval of ejection is Ejection seats have been traditionally fitted in military included. aircraft from the late 1940’s and onwards. But it was not used In this method there is no need to open the roof of the in the civil aircrafts because of the following reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace and Propulsion A
    Commerce Control List Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 Category 9—page 1 CATEGORY 9 - AEROSPACE AND turbine engines which meet all of the following: PROPULSION a. Certified by the civil aviation authority in a country listed in Supplement No. 1 to Part 743; A. “END ITEMS,” “EQUIPMENT,” and “ACCESSORIES,” “ATTACHMENTS,” “PARTS,” “COMPONENTS,” AND b. Intended to power non-military manned “SYSTEMS” “aircraft” for which any of the following has been issued by a Wassenaar Arrangement N.B.: For propulsion systems designed or Participating State listed in Supplement No. 1 to rated against neutron or transient ionizing Part 743 for the “aircraft” with this specific radiation, see the U.S. Munitions List, 22 CFR engine type: part 121. b.1. A civil type certificate; or 9A001 Aero gas turbine engines having any of b.2. An equivalent document recognized the following (see List of Items Controlled). by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). License Requirements Note 2: 9A001.a does not apply to aero Reason for Control: NS, MT, AT gas turbine engines for Auxiliary Power Units (APUs) approved by the civil aviation authority Country Chart in a Wassenaar Arrangement Participating State Control(s) (See Supp. No. (see Supplement No. 1 to part 743 of the EAR). 1 to part 738) NS applies to entire entry NS Column 1 b. Designed to power an “aircraft” designed to MT applies to only to those MT Column 1 cruise at Mach 1 or higher, for more than 30 engines that meet the minutes. characteristics listed in 9A101 AT applies to entire entry AT Column 1 9A002 ‘Marine gas turbine engines’ designed List Based License Exceptions (See Part 740 for to use liquid fuel and having all of the a description of all license exceptions) following (see List of Items Controlled), and “specially designed” assemblies and LVS: N/A “components” therefor.
    [Show full text]
  • X-1Paper Glider Kit
    Educational Product Educators & National Aeronautics and Students Grades 5-12 Space Administration EB-2000-03-001-DFRC Educational Brief The X-1 Paper Glider Kit: Investigating the Basics of Flight with a Model of the First Supersonic Aircraft OBJECTIVES The students will: Build a glider. Learn how to change the flight characteristics of a glider. Conduct an experiment to answer a question. STANDARDS AND SKILLS Science Science as Inquiry Physical Science Science and Technology Mathematics Measurement Problem Solving Science Process Skills Making Models Investigating Predicting BACKGROUND ON THE X-1 RESEARCH AIRCRAFT The X-1 was the first in a series of rocket-powered re- search aircraft built for the US Air Force and NASA’s predecessor, the National Advisory Committee on Aero- nautics (NACA). Originally designated the XS-1 (for Ex- perimental Sonic-1), it was built by the Bell Aircraft Company to break the alleged “sound barrier” and in- vestigate the transonic speed range (speeds slightly below to just above the speed of sound). This was tech- nological “no-man’s” land at the time, as there were no research techniques or flight experience to dupli- cate it exactly. The X-1 was not designed to take off under its own The paper model glider depicts the second X-1 aircraft power, but was instead taken aloft attached to the bomb built, which was flown by the NACA from 1947-1951 bay of a modified B-29 bomber. This fuel saving mea- (shown in the photographs that accompany this Edu- sure allowed for more flight time at test altitudes.
    [Show full text]