MICHAEL C. HELLER The embodied psyche of organismic psychology: a possible frame for a dialogue between psychotherapy schools and modalities1 Michael C. Heller Abstract In this article, I share general principles that allow me to situate body psychotherapy within the realm of other psychotherapy schools. The frame I use comes from experimental psychology, which has traditionally defended the vision of an embodied psyche which includes mind and affects. I will focus on French-speaking organismic psychology THE ART AND SCIENCE OF SOMATIC PRAXIS (Lamarck – Bernard – Charcot - Ribot - Binet - Janet - Wallon – Piaget) because this was my basic academic training, but I will also mention other trends of organismic experimental psychology. I will then argue that improving the dialogue between these two fields could be mutually beneficial, and that it is also a necessary step to create an umbrella theory for psychotherapy. Keywords: experimental psychology, psychotherapy, body, organism, James, Charcot, Janet, Freud, Watson, Ferenczi, Reich, schools and modalities International Body Psychotherapy Journal The Art and Science of Somatic Praxis Volume 15, Number 1 spring 2016 Lisbon Congress Supplement pp 20 - 50. ISSN 2169-4745 Printing, ISSN 2168-1279 Online © Author and USABP/EABP. Reprints and permissions
[email protected] Introduction The field of psychotherapy is well known for its division into heterogeneousmodalities (e.g., cognitive, emotion, verbal, behavior, body) and schools (e.g., behavioral, cognitive, Freudian, Jungian, Reichian and systemic). Psychotherapy schools often propose formulations that are INTERNATIONAL BODY PSYCHOTHERAPY JOURNAL PSYCHOTHERAPY BODY INTERNATIONAL school-specific, self-promoting and difficult to share. Recently there has been an increasingly large movement supporting eclectic forms of psychotherapy (Norcross, 2005).