DOCSLIB.ORG

Toward a Classification of General Systems Theory Concepts: the Categorization of Vocabulary Components and Their Su Age Patterns in the Literature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toward a Classification of General Systems Theory Concepts: the Categorization of Vocabulary Components and Their Su Age Patterns in the Literature Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1982 Toward a Classification of General Systems Theory Concepts: the Categorization of Vocabulary Components and Their sU age Patterns in the Literature. Stephanie S. Robbins Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Robbins, Stephanie S., "Toward a Classification of General Systems Theory Concepts: the Categorization of Vocabulary Components and Their sU age Patterns in the Literature." (1982). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3771. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3771 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce •this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. Universfo Microfilms International 300 N. Z eeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 8229514 Robbins, Stephanie S . TOWARD A CLASSIFICATION OF GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY CONCEPTS: THE CATEGORIZATION OF VOCABULARY COMPONENTS AND THEIR USAGE PATTERNS IN THE LITERATURE The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical ColP hD . 1982 University Microfilms international300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Copyright 1983 by Robbins, Stephanie S. All Rights Reserved TOWARD A CLASSIFICATION OF GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY CONCEPTS THE CATEGORIZATION OF VOCABULARY COMPONENTS AND THEIR USAGE PATTERNS IN THE LITERATURE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Business Administration by Stephanie S. Robbins B.A., Emerson College, 1969 M.ED., Memphis State University, 1972 Ph.D., The University of Alabama, 1975 August 1982 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It would be difficult to acknowledge or even identify all the people who have in some way contributed to my professional develop­ ment particularly since thiB is my second Ph.D. program. However, there are a number of individuals who have specifically provided me with a climate of growth at LSU that X would like to thank. Special gratitude must first be extended to Dr. Terence A. Oliva, Chairman of my Ph.D. committee. It was Dr. Oliva who introduced me to a discipline that helped tie together my rather eclectic background and sparked my imagination. Moreover, he helped develop my intellectual and professional capabilities while keeping me in touch with reality. Finally, this dissertation may never have been completed had it not been for his dedication and support. I would like to particularly express my appreciation to Dr. Michael• H. Peters for being willing to answer endless questions during several independent studies and for his patience. I would also like to thank Dr. Jerry A. Wallin, Dr. William W. Williams and Dr. Fred M. Smith for serving as members of my committee. Thanks must also be extended to Dr. Jeff Ringuest and Dr. Nancy Keith. Although neither were a member of my committee, both willingly gave a great deal of time answering questions about the statistical analysis performed in this study. I would also like to extend my thanks to Brenda Gatlin who retained a sense of humor ii through innumerable rewrites and somehow always found the time to type one more page. Finally, I would like to express my love and respect for my husband, John. I doubt that I could have made it through a second Ph.D. program without the stable environment that he provided. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................. ii LIST OF T A B L E S ............ vii LIST OF FIGURES...................... viii ABSTRACT ................................................... ix Chapter I . INTRODUCTION ......................................... 1 Overview of the Problem.............................. 1 Purpose of the S t u d y .......... 4 Hypotheses ........................................... 5 S c o p e ................................................. 6 Contribution ........................................ 7 Justification.......... 8 Limitations........................................... 10 Dissertation Overview ................................ 12 II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ............................ 14 Introduction .................................. 14 Review of: "A Survey of General Systems Theory" by 0. R. Y o u n g ................... '........ 19 Review of: "Towards a System of Systems Concepts" by Russell L. A c k o f f .................. 23 Review of: "Linkage Propositions Between Fifty Principal Systems Concepts" by L. Raphael Troncale........................................... 24 Review of: "Structural Analysis of General Systems Theory" by Virender Jain .................. 26 Summary ............................................. 28 III. METHODOLOGY........................................... 30 Introduction......................................... 30 Criteria Used for the Identification of Major General Systems Theory Vocabulary Components .............. 30 Pilot S t u d y ........................................... 33 Phase O n e ......................................... 33 Phase T w o ......................................... 36 iv V TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page Sample Design ........... ..... 42 Stratification Scheme ..... .................. 42 Sample S i z e .......... 44 Determination of Major General Systems Theory Vocabulary Components ............................ 48 Classification Scheme Development .................... 54 Statistical Procedures Used to Test the Hypotheses . 55 Hypothesis 1 ...................................... 57 Hypothesis I I .................................... 58 Hypothesis I I I .................................... 58 Validity and R e l i a b i l i t y............................ 59 Summary................................ 61 IV. CLASSIFICATION S CH E M E................................ 63 Introduction ........... ..... 63 Presentation of a Descriptive Classification Scheme . 66 Presentation of a Computer-based Classification Sch e m e............................................ 69 Comparison of the Descriptive and Computer-based Classification Schemes ............................ 73 Comparison of the Descriptive and Computer-based Classification Schemes With That Developed By Y o u n g .......................................... 79 Comparison of the Descriptive and Computer-based Classification Schemes With That Developed ■ By Ack o f f ........................................ 87 Comparison of the Descriptive and Computer-based Classification Schemes With That Developed by T r o n c a l e ...................................... 87 Comparison of the Descriptive and Computer-based Classification Schemes With That Developed by J a i n .......................................... 88 Summary.............................................. 89 V. STATISTICAL A N A L Y S I S ................................ 91 Introduction........................................ 91 Results and Analysis of Hypothesis I ................ 91 Results and Analysis of Hypothesis II ................ 97 Results and Analysis of Hypothesis III ........ 101 Assessment of Reliability ............................ 105 Summary............................... ■.............. 106 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...................... 110 Summary.............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity This Page Intentionally Left Blank Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity
    Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity This Page Intentionally Left Blank Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity A Platform for Designing Business Architecture SECOND EDITION Jamshid Gharajedaghi AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101-4495, USA 84 Theobald's Road, London WC1X 8RR, UK This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, E-mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting “Support & Contact” then “Copyright and Permission” and then “Obtaining Permissions.” Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gharajedaghi, Jamshid. Systems thinking : managing chaos and complexity : a platform for designing business architecture / Jamshid Gharajedaghi. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7506-7163-7 (alk. paper) 1. System analysis. 2. Chaotic behavior in systems. 3. Industrial management. 4. Technological complexity. I. Title. T57.6.G52 1999 003—dc21 98-55939 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Systems Theory (Under Construction)
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Faculty and Researcher Publications Faculty and Researcher Publications 2008-06-30 Living Systems Theory (under construction) Bradley, Gordon http://hdl.handle.net/10945/38246 Living Systems Theory (under construction) Agranoff, B. W. (2003). Obituaries: James Grier Miller. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from University of Michigan: The University Record Online: http://www.ur.umich.edu/0203/Feb03_03/obits.shtml Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller. Crawford, Raymond R. (1981). An Application of Living Systems Theory to Combat Models. Master’s Thesis. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School. http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA101103 Duncan, Daniel M. (1972). James G. Miller's Living Systems Theory: Issues for Management Thought and Practice. The Academy of Management Journal, 15:4, 513-523. http://www.jstor.org/stable/255145?seq=1 Kuhn, Alfred. (1979). Differences vs. Similarities in Living Systems. Contemporary Sociology, 8:5, 691- 696. http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0094- 3061(197909)8%3A5%3C691%3ADVSILS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4 Miller, James Grier. (1979). Response to the Reviewers of Living Systems. Contemporary Sociology, 8:5, 705-715. http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0094- 3061(197909)8%3A5%3C705%3ARTTROL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8 Miller, James Grier. (1995). Living Systems. Niwot: University of Colorado. (out of print) Oliva, Terence A. and R. Eric Reidenbach. (1981). General Living Systems Theory and Marketing: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45:4, 30-37. http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022- 2429(198123)45%3A4%3C30%3AGLSTAM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R Parent, Elaine.
    [Show full text]
  • Consciousness and Its Evolution: from a Human Being to a Post-Human
    Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii Taras Handziy Consciousness and Its Evolution: From a Human Being to a Post-Human Rozprawa doktorska napisana pod kierunkiem dr hab. Zbysława Muszyńskiego, prof. nadzw. UMCS Lublin 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 Chapter 1: Consciousness, Mind, and Body …………………………………………………… 18 1.1 Conceptions of Consciousness …………………………………………………………. 18 1.1.1 Colin McGinn’s Conception of Consciousness ……………………………………….... 18 1.1.1.1 Owen Flanagan’s Analysis of Colin McGinn’s Conception of Consciousness ….…….. 20 1.1.2 Paola Zizzi’s Conception of Consciousness ………………………………………….… 21 1.1.3 William James’ Stream of Consciousness ……………………………………………… 22 1.1.4 Ervin Laszlo’s Conception of Consciousness …………………………………………... 22 1.2 Consciousness and Soul ………………………………………...………………………. 24 1.3 Problems in Definition of Consciousness ………………………………………………. 24 1.4 Distinctions between Consciousness and Mind ………………………………………... 25 1.5 Problems in Definition of Mind ………………………………………………………… 26 1.6 Dogmatism in Mind and Mind without Dogmatism ……………………………………. 27 1.6.1 Dogmatism in Mind …………………………………………………………………….. 27 1.6.2 Mind without Dogmatism …………………………………………………………….… 28 1.6.3 Rupert Sheldrake’s Dogmatism in Science …………………………………………….. 29 1.7 Criticism of Scientific Approaches towards Study of Mind ……………….…………… 30 1.8 Conceptions of Mind …………………………………………………………………… 31 1.8.1 Rupert Sheldrake’s Conception of Extended Mind …………………………………….. 31 1.8.2 Colin McGinns’s Knowing and Willing Halves of Mind ……………………………..... 34 1.8.3 Francisco Varela’s, Evan Thompson’s, and Eleanor Rosch’s Embodied Mind ………... 35 1.8.4 Andy Clark’s Extended Mind …………………………………………………………... 35 1.8.5 Role of Mind Understood by Paola Zizzi ………………………………………………. 36 1.9 Mind in Buddhism, Consciousness in Tibetan Buddhism ……………………………… 36 1.9.1 Mind in Buddhism ……………………………………………………………………… 36 1.9.2 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Serendipities Vol.1 No1.Fin
    ARTICLE A “Not Particularly Felicitous” Phrase: A History of the “Behavioral Sciences” Label Jefferson D. Pooley [email protected] Abstract The article reconstructs the history of the "behavioral sciences" label, from scattered interwar use through to the decisive embrace of the newly prominent Ford Foundation in the early Cold War. The rapid uptake of the label, the article concludes, was the result of the Ford Foundation’s 1951 decision to name its social science unit the “Behavioral Sciences Program” (BSP). With Ford’s en- couragement, the term was widely adopted by quantitative social scientists eager to tap the founda- tion’s social science funds. The label’s newness and its link to the gigantic foundation’s initiative generated much suspicion and resistance as well. Keywords Behavioral sciences, Ford Foundation, Cold War There are few behavioral scientists today. But as recently as the 1950s and 1960s, self-identified “behavioral scientists” occupied the elite ranks of American social science. The rapid uptake of the label was the result of the Ford Foundation’s 1951 decision to name its social science unit the “Be- havioral Sciences Program” (BSP). With Ford’s encouragement, the term was widely adopted by quantitative social scientists eager to tap the foundation’s social science funds. The label’s newness and its link to the gigantic foundation’s initiative generated much suspicion and resistance as well. This paper reconstructs the label’s career from scattered interwar use through to Ford’s embrace. Existing histories trace the term back to psychologist James Grier Miller’s Committee on the Be- havioral Sciences at the University of Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • 212 © 1978 Scientific American
    212 © 1978 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC Adaptation The manifest fit between organisms and their environment is a major outcome of evolution. Yet natural selection does not lead inevitably to adaptation; indeed, it is sometimes hard to define an adaptation by Richard C. Lewontin he theory about the history of life iors that appear to have been carefully These "organs of extreme perfection" that is now generally accepted, the and artfully designed to enable each or­ were only the most extreme case of a TDarwinian theory of evolution by ganism to appropriate the world around more general phenomenon: adaptation. natural selection, is meant to explain it for its own life. Darwin's theory of evolution by natural two different aspects of the appearance It was the marvelous fit of organisms selection was meant to solve both the of the living world: diversity and fitness. to the environment, much more than the problem of the origin of diversity and There are on the order of two million great diversity of forms, that was the the problem of the origin of adaptation species now living, and since at least chief evidence of a Supreme Designer. at one stroke. Perfect organs were a dif­ 99.9 percent of the species that have Darwin realized that if a naturalistic ficulty of the theory not in that natural ever lived are now extinct, the most con­ theory of evolution was to be successful. selection could not account for them but servative guess would be that two billion it would have to explain the apparent rather in that they were its most rigorous species have made their appearance on perfection of organisms and not simply test, since on the face of it they seemed the earth since the beginning of the their variation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Umpleby Stuart Reconsidering Cybernetics
    UMPLEBY STUART RECONSIDERING CYBERNETICS The field of cybernetics attracted great attention in the 1950s and 1960s with its prediction of a Second Industrial Revolution due to computer technology. In recent years few people in the US have heard of cybernetics (Umpleby, 2015a, see Figures 1 and 2 at the end of Paper). But a wave of recent books suggests that interest in cybernetics is returning (Umpleby and Hughes, 2016, see Figure at the end of Paper). This white paper reviews some basic ideas in cybernetics. I recommend these and other ideas as a resource for better understanding and modeling of social systems, including threat and response dynamics. Some may claim that whatever was useful has already been incorporated in current work generally falling under the complexity label, but that is not the case. Work in cybernetics has continued with notable contributions in recent years. Systems science, complex systems, and cybernetics are three largely independent fields with their own associations, journals and conferences (Umpleby, 2017). Four types of descriptions used in social science After working in social science and systems science for many years I realized that different academic disciplines use different basic elements. Economists use measurable variables such as price, savings, GDP, imports and exports. Psychologists focus on ideas, concepts and attitudes. Sociologists and political scientists focus on groups, organizations, and coalitions. Historians and legal scholars emphasize events and procedures. People trained in different disciplines construct different narratives using these basic elements. One way to reveal more of the variety in a social system is to create at least four descriptions – one each using variables, ideas, groups, and events (See the figures and tables in Medvedeva & Umpleby, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Organism, a Historical and Conceptual Critique
    Do organisms have an ontological status? Charles T. Wolfe Unit for History and Philosophy of Science University of Sydney [email protected] forthcoming in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32:2-3 (2010) Abstract The category of „organism‟ has an ambiguous status: is it scientific or is it philosophical? Or, if one looks at it from within the relatively recent field or sub-field of philosophy of biology, is it a central, or at least legitimate category therein, or should it be dispensed with? In any case, it has long served as a kind of scientific “bolstering” for a philosophical train of argument which seeks to refute the “mechanistic” or “reductionist” trend, which has been perceived as dominant since the 17th century, whether in the case of Stahlian animism, Leibnizian monadology, the neo-vitalism of Hans Driesch, or, lastly, of the “phenomenology of organic life” in the 20th century, with authors such as Kurt Goldstein, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Georges Canguilhem. In this paper I try to reconstruct some of the main interpretive „stages‟ or „layers‟ of the concept of organism in order to critically evaluate it. How might „organism‟ be a useful concept if one rules out the excesses of „organismic‟ biology and metaphysics? Varieties of instrumentalism and what I call the „projective‟ concept of organism are appealing, but perhaps ultimately unsatisfying. 1. What is an organism? There have been a variety of answers to this question, not just in the sense of different definitions (an organism is a biological individual; it is a living being, or at least the difference between a living organism and a dead organism is somehow significant in a way that does not seem to make sense for other sorts of entities, like lamps and chairs; it is a self-organizing, metabolic system; etc.) but more tendentiously, in the 1 sense that philosophers, scientists, „natural philosophers‟ and others have both asserted and denied the existence of organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • 82 Chapter IV Niklas Luhmann's Communicative Systems Theory
    Chapter IV Niklas Luhmann’s Communicative Systems Theory Framework With his concentrated formulations in Ecological Communication (1989), Luhmann deals with ecological communication far more directly than Bateson. In principle, that must make it easier to introduce his framework, especially given the additional facility his highly systematic approach to both writing and composing was supposed to impart. In reality, however, it is no less difficult introducing Luhmann in the current context because of the following factors: One, he has been no less lucky than was Bateson at having been “discovered” and had his general thought introduced by the excellent introducers to his individual books that have been translated into English.1 Two, the temptation to introduce Luhmann’s overall social theory, instead of focusing strictly on his theory of EC, is enormous: The temptation is only transformed into a treacherous pressure because of his systematic style of writing and conceptualization in which each one of his individual philosophical forays is to a great extent a specific replay of his overall philosophy. For example, his theory of EC is, in most ways, a tightly- designed and shortened localization of his larger philosophy of social systems. Three, and in relation to the above, it is also very tempting to introduce the history of systems theory as a whole (part of which I have done already in the earlier part of this essay), make a comprehensive gesture at placing Luhmann’s particular interventions within it (constitutive of his overall systems philosophy), and then to place his theory of EC within the above two. And, four, Luhmann’s work is highly self-referential, obtuse, abstract, and frightfully repetitive! What follows below does not completely resolve the above technical difficulties of introducing—some of which translate, on the whole, into the age-old problem of detecting and managing avoidable detail.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Systems Theory?
    What is Systems Theory? Systems theory is an interdisciplinary theory about the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science, and is a framework by which one can investigate and/or describe any group of objects that work together to produce some result. This could be a single organism, any organization or society, or any electro-mechanical or informational artifact. As a technical and general academic area of study it predominantly refers to the science of systems that resulted from Bertalanffy's General System Theory (GST), among others, in initiating what became a project of systems research and practice. Systems theoretical approaches were later appropriated in other fields, such as in the structural functionalist sociology of Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann . Contents - 1 Overview - 2 History - 3 Developments in system theories - 3.1 General systems research and systems inquiry - 3.2 Cybernetics - 3.3 Complex adaptive systems - 4 Applications of system theories - 4.1 Living systems theory - 4.2 Organizational theory - 4.3 Software and computing - 4.4 Sociology and Sociocybernetics - 4.5 System dynamics - 4.6 Systems engineering - 4.7 Systems psychology - 5 See also - 6 References - 7 Further reading - 8 External links - 9 Organisations // Overview 1 / 20 What is Systems Theory? Margaret Mead was an influential figure in systems theory. Contemporary ideas from systems theory have grown with diversified areas, exemplified by the work of Béla H. Bánáthy, ecological systems with Howard T. Odum, Eugene Odum and Fritj of Capra , organizational theory and management with individuals such as Peter Senge , interdisciplinary study with areas like Human Resource Development from the work of Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Person-Centred Counselling 1 Introducing Person-Centred 1 Counselling
    Introducing person-centred counselling 1 Introducing person-centred 1 counselling This book is about the Person-Centred Approach (PCA) to counselling. It is for counsellors, therapists, and clinical psychologists either practising or in training, and for people who use counselling skills as part of their work, but who do not want to be full-time counsellors — nurses, teachers, social workers, personnel managers, and community workers, for example. It is based on the work of Carl Rogers (1902–1987), one of the leading counselling psychologists of the twentieth century, who was responsible for some of the most original research work ever undertaken into the factors that facilitate personal and social change (see, for example, Rogers, 1957a, 1959). Throughout a career that spanned more than fifty years as a writer, researcher, and practitioner, Rogers developed and refined an approach to counselling that is widely recognised as one of the most creative and effective ways of helping people in need. Although this book is focused on person-centred counselling, I see it as useful for people exploring a range of different approaches before committing themselves to one in particular, and a valuable resource for counselling trainers, whether person-centred or not. It offers ideas and perspectives, perhaps even inspiration occasionally, and makes reference to some of the literature, both classical and recent. I have tried to be careful about giving the sources for the material in this book, and I am indebted to the many authors I have referred to in writing it. The hundreds, perhaps thousands of hours spent discussing the person-centred approach to counselling with students and others, talking with practitioners and being with clients, have contributed to the content of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNICAL PROGRAM NAFIPS-TARDEC Session*
    TECHNICAL PROGRAM NAFIPS-TARDEC Session* Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:00 AM Visitor Check-in at Badge Office (Bldg. 232, Gate 38) Continental Breakfast and TARDEC Seminar Sign-In TARDEC Bldg 200A-Auditorium 10:00 AM TARDEC Welcome - Dr. Grant Gerhart. Session Chair: Tom Meitzler 10:10 AM From Search Engines to Question-Answering Systems—The Problems of World Knowledge, Relevance and Deduction Lotfi A. Zadeh, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley 10:50 AM BREAK 11:00 AM Arming the Robotic Solder with Fuzzy Logic Ronald R Yager, Machine Intelligence Institute 11:40 AM LUNCH- Bldg. 200A Cafeteria (Box Lunches Provided) 12:10 PM Standard Fuzzy Arithmetic and Constrained Fuzzy Arithmetic George J. Klir, Department of Systems Science & Industrial Eng., Binghamton University (SUNNY) 12:50 PM Fuzzy-Neural Computing and the Development of Intelligent Systems: Theory and Industrial Applications Madan M. Gupta, Intelligent Systems Research Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan 1:30 PM BREAK 1:40 PM Hybrid Fuzzy Systems: Classification and Prediction Applications Piero P. Bonissone, General Electric Global Research 2:20 PM Soft Computing for Sensor and Algorithm Fusion Jim Keller, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Missouri-Columbia 3:00 PM BREAK 3:10 PM Panel Discussion: The Importance of Fuzzy Logic Applications to the US Army and Homeland Defense Tom Meitzler, Moderator Panelists: Lotfi A. Zadeh, Ronald R Yager, George J. Klir, Madan M. Gupta, Piero P. Bonissone, Jim Keller, and Dimitar Filev 4:00PM Closing Remarks *This session is open to US citizens only. Thursday, June 23, 2005, 08:30AM – 10:00AM Plenary Session I 8:30 AM The Concept of a Generalized Constraint—A Bridge from Natural Languages to Mathematics Lofti A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organismic Psychology of Andras Angyal in Relation to Sri Aurobindo’S Philosophy of Integral Nondualism
    The Organismic Psychology of Andras Angyal in Relation to Sri Aurobindo’s Philosophy of Integral Nondualism The Organismic Psychology of Andras Angyal in Relation to Sri Aurobindo’s Philosophy of Integral Nondualism RICHARD P. MARSH (Published in “The Integral Philosophy of Sri Aurobindo – A Commemorative Symposium Edited by Haridas Chaudhuri and Frederic Spiegelberg” by GEORGE ALLEN &UNWIN LTD.) - 1 - The Organismic Psychology of Andras Angyal in Relation to Sri Aurobindo’s Philosophy of Integral Nondualism COMPARATIVE studies of Eastern and Western psychological and religious concepts often make references to the works of Dr C. G. Jung, the founder of analytical psychology. This is altogether proper. Dr Jung, as is well known, has undertaken various forms of psychological research with an inevitable appeal to students of Asian thought. He has, in addition, communicated the results of his research with a sensitivity and a resourcefulness which have added to their appeal. Similarly, the achievement of Sri Aurobindo in creating the philosophy of integral nondualism, a remarkable blend of original thought with much that is first rate and enduring in both the Eastern and the Western traditions, has led to cross comparisons from the other side. In reading Aurobindo, one constantly experiences the shock of recognition. It is as though in Aurobindo one had rediscovered the West, or as if one had come across a new Dr Jung with a startling new vocabulary and a curiously vivid and massive style. So much of Jung is there, although cut to the pattern of a different idiom: the phenomenon of introversion, the concept of the collective unconscious, the relationship of ego to self, even in a sense the classification into psychological types-these and more are in Aurobindo, inviting comparison.
    [Show full text]