DOCSLIB.ORG

Defence Against Terrorism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Defence Against Terrorism Centre of Excellence - Defence Against Terrorism Osman AYTAÇ Col TUR ARMY Chief Education & Training Department [email protected] NATO SPS INFORMATION DAY 4 February 2010 İstanbul / TURKEY UNCLASSIFIED 1/25 Agenda * Centre of Excellence Defence Against Terrorism * COEDAT Activities Supported by SPS Programme UNCLASSIFIED 2/25 Prague Summit * Transformation of NATO should continue, * Capabilities against the contemporary threats must be addressed: − Defence against terrorism, − Strengthen capabilities to defend against cyber attacks, − Augment and improve CBRN defence capabilities, − Examine options for addressing the increasing missile threat . UNCLASSIFIED 3/25 Centres of Excellence New NATO command arrangements should be supported by a network of Centres of Excellence (COEs) UNCLASSIFIED 4/25 Milestones Centre of Excellence Defence Against Terrorism Declaration of Intention : 01 December 2003 Inauguration of the Centre : 28 June 2005 New Allies Join the Centre : Fall 2005-Fall 2006 NATO Accreditation : 14 August 2006 UNCLASSIFIED 5/25 Centre of Excellence (COE) COE is a nationally or multinationally sponsored entity which offers recognized expertise & experience to the benefit of the alliance especially in support of transformation process*. * Reference: MCM-236-03 MC Concept for Centers of Excellence, 04 December ‘03 UNCLASSIFIED 6/25 Centres of Excellence in NATO * Joint Air Power Competence (DEU) * Defence Against Terrorism (TUR) * Naval Mine Warfare (BEL) * Combined Joint Ops. from the Sea (USA) * Cold Weather Ops. (NOR) * Civil-Military Cooperation (NLD) 13 * Joint CBRN Defence (CZE) Accredited * Analysis & Sim. for Prep. of Air Ops. (FRA) Centres * Command & Control (NLD) * Cooperative Cyber Defence (EST) * Confined & Shallow Waters (DEU) * Military Engineering (DEU) * Military Medical (HUN) UNCLASSIFIED 7/25 Participation NATO PfP MD ICI International Countries Countries Countries Countries Organizations Participation to the centre as sponsoring x x x x nation Participation to the activities, products & services * Relations with other countries may be developed on a case by case basis in accordance with NATO policies. * Reference: MCM-236-03 MC Concept for Centers of Excellence, 04 December ‘03 UNCLASSIFIED 8/25 Mission * Provide subject matter expertise, * Conduct DAT training and education, * Support NATO in testing and validating concepts, * Assist in doctrine development, * Contribute to NATO standardization to improve capabilities and interoperability. UNCLASSIFIED 9/25 Relationships NATO Allied Command Allied Command Transformation Operations (ACT) (ACO) Functional MOU CT Advisor to ACT byA d on DAT te na di COE-DAT or Co FF uu nn cc tt ii oo nn aa ll RR ee ll aa tt ii oo nn ss hh ii pp Technical Arrangements NATO NATO Non-NATO External Other COEs Universities Agencies Schools Nations Entities UNCLASSIFIED 10/25 Relationships 1. Near East South Asia Center for Strategic Studies 1. G.C.Marshall European Center for Security Studies, 2. National Defense University Germany 3. Naval Postgraduate School 2. NATO School, Germany 4. Center for Civil-Military Relations 3. EU Counterterrorism Coordinator 5. Asia Pacific Center for Security Studies 4. National Counter Terrorism Coordinator, Netherlands 6. Georgetown University 7. Inter-University Center for Terrorism Studies CIS Antiterrorism Center NATO Defense College, Italy China Institute for Contemporary International Relations Institute for Counter Terrorism, Israel Center of Land Warfare Studies Indian Army HQ UNCLASSIFIED 11/25 Previous Activities 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Courses 4 5 6 9 7 1 32 Conferences - - 1 - - - 1 ATCs - - 2 2 3 - 7 Workshops - 2 3 3 2 1 11 Seminars 1 - 1 - - - 2 Symposia 1 1 - 1 - - 3 C-IED Train. - - 2 6 6 1 15 Total 6 8 15 21 18 3 71 UNCLASSIFIED 12/25 Participation Year Coun. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total NATO 154 463 672 1141 300 64 2794 PfP 26 79 147 256 129 17 654 MD 23 27 22 31 11 42 156 Other 59 90 66 141 123 53 532 Total 262 659 907 1569 563 176 4136 4136 participants from 93 countries 833 lecturers from 47 countries UNCLASSIFIED 13/25 2010 Education Activity Plan No. SUBJECT DATE/2010 1 Workshop: Responses to Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism January 2 Course: Legal Aspects of Combating Terrorism January 3 Symposium: Global Terrorism and International Cooperation-III March 4 Course: Cyber Terrorism April 5 Course: Defence Against Suicide Bombings April ATC: DAT: Different Dimensions and Trends of Emerging Threat: May 6 Terrorism (Afghanistan) 7 Course: Defence Against Terrorism May 8 ATC: DAT: Conceptual Approach in Combating Terrorism (Serbia) May Course: Efficient Crisis Management to Mitigate the Effects of June 9 Terrorist Activities 10 ATC: Defence Against Terrorism (Kazakhstan) September 11 Workshop: Al-Qaeda Inspired Terrorism, Prospects and Limitations September 12 Workshop: Future Trends in Terrorism October 13 Course: Terrorism and Media November 14 Workshop: Maritime Security & Defence Against Terrorism November 15 Workshop: Separatist Terrorism, Prospects and Limitations December Course: NATO Tactical Operations in an IED Environment UNCLASSIFIED16-21 14/25 (January-April-May-July-September-November) Advanced Training Courses Supported by SPS NO. NAME COUNTRY DATE Border Security and Transborder 26 February- 1. Georgia Crimes 02 March 2007 Organizational & Psychological Profile 2. Macedonia 22-26 October 2007 of Terrorism Bosnia & 3. Legal Aspects of Combating Terrorism 04-08 February 2008 Herzegovina 08-12 September 4. Use of Force in Countering Terrorism Kyrgyzstan 2008 Analysis and Strategies to Counter the 20-24 April 5. Albania Terrorism Threat 2009 Cyber Terrorism; A 21st Century 6. Moldova 12-16 October 2009 Challenge to State Security 7. Defence Against Terrorism Jordan 03-07 January 2010 UNCLASSIFIED 15/25 Advanced Training Courses (ATCs) 7 ATCs in 2007-2009 Moldova (2009) Georgia (2007) Kyrgyzstan (2008) FYROM*(2007) Albania (2009) B-H (2008) Jordan (2010) UNCLASSIFIED 16/25 * Turkey recognizes Republic of Macedonia with its constitutional name. Advanced Research Workshops Supported by SPS Programme NO. NAME DATE Integration of People Experience Trauma After 1. 27-28 April 2006 Terrorist Attacks into Modern Society 2. The Media: Vital Ground For Terrorist Operations 07-08 June 2006 3. Train The Trainers of The Amputee Players 07-11 May 2007 4. Motivation For Suicide Bombers 24-25 May 2007 5. Responses to Cyber Terrorism 04-05 October 2007 6. Defence Against WMD Terrorism 10-11 April 2008 7. Transportation Security Against Terrorism 05-06 May 2008 8. Bioterrorism 13-14 November 2008 19-20 November 9. Homeland Security Organization in DAT 2009 10. Response to Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism 14-15 January 2010 UNCLASSIFIED 17/25 Participation (ATC & ARW) ATCsATCs (2007(2007--20102010)) 289289 participantsparticipants fromfrom 1818 countriescountries 7171 lecturerslecturers fromfrom 1111 countriescountries ARWsARWs (2006(2006--2010)2010) 421421 participantsparticipants fromfrom 4242 countriescountries 165165 lecturerslecturers fromfrom 3030 countriescountries UNCLASSIFIED 18/25 50 45 40 35 37 30 25 Participation 20 ATCs (2007 15 10 5 0 48 40 ALBANIA 111111 -2009) CROATIA UNCLASSIFIED GERMANY 37 ROMANIA 36 41 SPAIN TURKEY 3 USA AZERBAIJAN B.HERZOGOVINA 35 GEORGIA KYRGYZSTAN NATO MACEDONIA PFP 22 MOLDOVA MD SERBIA UKRAINE 11 ALGERIA JORDAN MAURITANIA 19/25 50 45 40 35 30 25 Participation 20 ARWs (2006 15 10 11 5 12 0 11 ALBANIA -2010 BELGIUM UNCLASSIFIED BULGARIA 4 ) CANADA 1 6 CROATIA 189 CZECH REPUB 2 GERMANY 3 GREECE 5 HUNGARY 22 16 ITALY LATVIA 3 LITHUANIA NETHERLANDS 3 11 14 ROMANIA NATO SPAIN TURKEY OTHER UK 13 2 USA 1 AFGHANISTAN BANGLADESH PAKISTAN 20/25 16 15 14 13 12 11 14 10 9 8 7 6 Participation 5 4 99 ARWs (2006 3 2 1 15 0 1 8 AUSTRIA 9 AZERBAIJAN B.HERZOGOVINA -2010) GEORGIA 5 UNCLASSIFIED KAZAKHSTAN KYRGYZSTAN 4 MACEDONIA 1 M OLDOVA 2 MONTENEGRO 8 9 RUSSIA 1 SERBIA 2 SWEDEN TAJIKISTAN 10 4 TURKMENISTAN 1 UKRAINE ALGERIA 2 PFP EGYPT 3 ISRAEL MD JORDAN 2 MOROCCO TUNISIA 21/25 Publishment (NATO Science for Peace and Security Series) No. NAME 1. The Media: The Terrorist’s Battlefield The Integration and Management of Traumatized 2. People After Terrorist Attacks 3. Suicide as a Weapon Organizational and Psychological Aspects of 4. Terrorism 5. Responses to Cyber Terrorism 6. Legal Aspects of Combating Terrorism 7. Transportation Security Against Terrorism 8. Amputee Sports for Victims of Terrorism Defence Against Weapons of Mass Destruction 9. Terrorism UNCLASSIFIED 22/25 ATCs (2010) DADAT:T: Different Different Dimensions Dimensions and and Trends Trends of of Emerging Emerging Threat:Threat: Terrorism Terrorism AfghanistanAfghanistan (03-07(03-07 May May 2010) 2010) DAT:DAT: Conceptual Conceptual Approach Approach in in Combating Combating Terrorism Terrorism SerbiaSerbia (24-28(24-28 May May 2010) 2010) DefenceDefence Against Against Terrorism Terrorism KazakhstanKazakhstan (20-24(20-24 September September 2010) 2010) UNCLASSIFIED 23/25 ARWs (2010) ResponseResponse to to Nuclear Nuclear & & Radiological Radiological Terrorism Terrorism (14-15(14-15 January January 2010) 2010) ConductedConducted FutureFuture Trends Trends in in Terrorism Terrorism (11-12(11-12 October October 2010) 2010) MaritimeMaritime Security Security & & Defence Defence A Againstgainst Terrorism Terrorism (08-09(08-09 November November 2010) 2010) UNCLASSIFIED 24/25 Centre of Excellence - Defence Against Terrorism UNCLASSIFIED 25/25.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Formation of the Corps of Engineers
    Formation of the U.S. Corps of Engineers Father of the Corps of Engineers At age 16 he was engaged by Lord Fairfax as a surveyor’s helper to survey 1.5 million acres of the Northern Neck of Virginia, which extended into the Shenandoah Valley At 17 he began surveying lots in Alexandria for pay, and became surveyor of Culpepper County later that summer. At age 21 he was given a major’s commission and made Adjutant of Southern Virginia. Six months later he led the first of three English expeditions into the Ohio Valley to initially parlay, then fight the French. Few individuals had a better appreciation of the Allegheny Mountains and the general character of all the lands comprising the American Colonies First Engineer Action Battle of Bunker Hill in Boston in 1775 Washington’s First Chief Engineer In 1775 Putnam entered the Continental Army as a lieutenant colonel. He was involved in the organization of the batteries and fortifications in Boston and New York City in 1776 and 1777, serving as Washington’s first chief Engineer. He went on to greater successes commanding a regiment under General Horatio Gates at the Battle of Saratoga in September 1777. He built new fortifications at West Point in 1778 and in 1779 he served under General Anthony Wayne. He was promoted to brigadier general four years later. Rufus Putnam 1738-1824 Chief Engineer 1777 - 1783 Washington pleaded for more engineers, which began arriving from France in 1776. In late 1777 Congress promoted Louis Duportail to brigadier general and Chief Engineer, a position he held for the duration of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • DAO Level 3 Certificate in Military Engineering (Armoured) Titan and Trojan Crew Supervision
    Qualification Handbook DAO Level 3 Certificate in Military Engineering (Armoured) Titan and Trojan crew supervision QN: 603/3232/3 The Qualification Overall Objective for the Qualifications This handbook relates to the following qualification: DAO Level 3 Certificate in Military Engineering (Armoured) Titan and Trojan crew supervision Pre-entry Requirements Learners are required to have completed the Class ME (Armd) Class 0-2 course, must be fully qualified AFV crewman and hold full category H driving licence Unit Content and Rules of Combination This qualification is made up of a total of 6 mandatory units and no optional units. To be awarded this qualification the candidate must achieve a total of 13 credits as shown in the table below. Unit Unit of assessment Level GLH TQT Credit number value L/617/0309 Supervise Titan Operation and 3 25 30 3 associated Equipment L/617/0312 Supervise Titan Crew 3 16 19 2 R/617/0313 Supervise Trojan Operation and 3 26 30 3 associated Equipment D/617/0315 Supervise Trojan Crew 3 16 19 2 H/617/0316 Supervise Trojan and Titan AFV 3 10 19 2 maintenance tasks K/617/0317 Carry out emergency procedures and 3 7 11 1 communication for Trojan and Titan AFV Totals 100 128 13 Age Restriction This qualification is available to learners aged 18 years and over. Opportunities for Progression This qualification creates a number of opportunities for progression through career development and promotion. Exemption No exemptions have been identified. 2 Credit Transfer Credits from identical RQF units that have already been achieved by the learner may be transferred.
    [Show full text]
  • 18News from the Royal School of Military
    RSME MATTERSNEWS FROM THE ROYAL SCHOOL OF MILITARY ENGINEERING GROUP 18 NOVEMBER 2018 Contents 4 5 11 DEMS BOMB DISPOSAL TRAINING UPDATE Defence Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD), It’s the ten-year anniversary of the signing of the Munitions and Search Training Regiment (DEMS RSME Public Private Partnership (PPP) Contract Trg Regt) operates across two sites. The first is and that decade has seen an impressive amount the more established... Read more on page 5 of change. A casual.. Read more on page 11 WELCOME Welcome to issue 18 of RSME Matters. Much has 15 changed across the RSME Group since issue 17 but the overall challenge, of delivering appropriately trained soldiers FEATURE: INNOVATION and military working animals... The Royal School of Military Engineering (RSME) Private Public Partnership (PPP) between the Secretary of State for Defence and... Read more on page 4 Read more on page 15 We’re always looking for new parts of the RSME to explore and share Front cover: Bomb disposal training in action at DEMS Trg Regt – see story on page 9. within RSME Matters. If you’d like us to tell your story then just let us know. Back cover: Royal Engineers approach the Rochester Bridge over the river Medway during a recent night exercise. Nicki Lockhart, Editor, [email protected] Photography: All images except where stated by Ian Clowes | goldy.uk Ian Clowes, Writer and Photographer, 07930 982 661 | [email protected] Design and production: Plain Design | plaindesign.co.uk Printed on FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council) certified paper, which supports the growth of responsible forest management worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Roles in Stabilization
    C O R P O R A T I O N Finding the Right Balance Department of Defense Roles in Stabilization Linda Robinson, Sean Mann, Jeffrey Martini, Stephanie Pezard For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2441 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0046-8 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report comes at an important juncture for U.S. policymaking. The report evaluates the nature and appropriateness of tasks the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fm 3-34.400 (Fm 5-104)
    FM 3-34.400 (FM 5-104) GENERAL ENGINEERING December 2008 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at (www.train.army.mil). *FM 3-34.400 (FM 5-104) Field Manual Headquarters No. 3-34.400 (5-104) Department of the Army Washington, DC, 9 December 2008 General Engineering Contents Page PREFACE ............................................................................................................ vii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... ix PART ONE GENERAL ENGINEERING IN THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT Chapter 1 GENERAL ENGINEERING AS AN ENGINEER FUNCTION ............................ 1-1 Full Spectrum General Engineering ................................................................... 1-1 Employment Considerations For General Engineering ...................................... 1-6 Assured Mobility Integration ............................................................................... 1-8 Full Spectrum Operations ................................................................................... 1-9 Homeland Security Implications For General Engineering .............................. 1-12 Chapter 2 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................... 2-1 Operational Environment ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Military Engineering 5-6 Syllabus
    Fairfax Collegiate 703 481-3080 · www.FairfaxCollegiate.com Military Engineering 5-6 Syllabus Course Goals 1 Physics Concepts and Applications Students learn the basics of physics, including Newton’s laws and projectile motion. They will apply this knowledge through the construction of miniature catapult structures and subsequent analysis of their functions. 2 History of Engineering Design Students learn about the progression of military and ballistics technology starting in the ancient era up until the end of the Middle Ages. Students will identify the context that these engineering breakthroughs arose from, and recognize the evolution of this technology as part of the engineering design process. 3 Design, Fabrication, and Testing Students work in small teams to build and test their projects, including identifying issues and troubleshooting as they arise. Students will demonstrate their understanding of this process through the design, prototyping, testing, and execution of an original catapult design. Course Topics 1 Ancient Era Siege Weapons 1.1 Brief History of Siege Warfare 1.2 Basic Physics 2 The Birth of Siege Warfare 2.1 Ancient Greece 2.2 Projectile Motion 3 Viking Siege! 3.1 History of the Vikings 3.2 Building with Triangles 4 Alexander the Great and Torsion Catapults Fairfax Collegiate · Have Fun and Learn! · For Rising Grades 3 to 12 4.1 The Conquests of Alexander the Great 4.2 The Torsion Spring and Lithobolos 5 The Romans 6 Julius Caesar 7 The Crusades 8 The Middle Ages 9 Castle Siege Course Schedule Day 1 Introduction and Ice Breaker Students learn about the course, their instructor, and each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aspects of Hydrogeology: an Introduction and Overview
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Military aspects of hydrogeology: an introduction and overview JOHN D. MATHER* & EDWARD P. F. ROSE Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: The military aspects of hydrogeology can be categorized into five main fields: the use of groundwater to provide a water supply for combatants and to sustain the infrastructure and defence establishments supporting them; the influence of near-surface water as a hazard affecting mobility, tunnelling and the placing and detection of mines; contamination arising from the testing, use and disposal of munitions and hazardous chemicals; training, research and technology transfer; and groundwater use as a potential source of conflict. In both World Wars, US and German forces were able to deploy trained hydrogeologists to address such problems, but the prevailing attitude to applied geology in Britain led to the use of only a few, talented individuals, who gained relevant experience as their military service progressed. Prior to World War II, existing techniques were generally adapted for military use. Significant advances were made in some fields, notably in the use of Norton tube wells (widely known as Abyssinian wells after their successful use in the Abyssinian War of 1867/1868) and in the development of groundwater prospect maps. Since 1945, the need for advice in specific military sectors, including vehicle mobility, explosive threat detection and hydrological forecasting, has resulted in the growth of a group of individuals who can rightly regard themselves as military hydrogeologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Engineers in Army
    Role of Engineers in Army By, Paranthaman.G Manivannan INDIAN ARMY • With about 1,414,000 soldiers in active service and about 1,800,000 reserve troops, the Indian Army is the world's second largest active standing army and the largest in terms of army populace. DEVELOPMENT OF INDIAN FORCES • The Indian Armed Forces is the overall unified military of the Republic of India encompassing the Indian Army, the Indian Navy, the Indian Air Force and various other inter-service institutions. • With an estimated total active force of 1,325,000 personnel,India maintains the world's second largest armed forces.Auxiliary services include the Indian Coast Guard, the Central Paramilitary Forces (CPF) and the Strategic Forces Command. India's official defense budget stands at $32.35 billion but the actual spending on the armed forces is estimated to be much higher than that • the Indian Armed Forces plans to have an active military space program and is currently developing a potent missile defense shield and nuclear triad capabilityIndia is moving to build a $2 billion or Rs 9,970.16 crore dedicated, highly secure and state-of-the-art optical fiber cable (OFC) network for the Army, Navy and Air Force. This will be one of the world’s largest, closed user group (CUG) networks for exclusive use by the million-plus personnel of the Indian armed forces NEED FOR MODERN ENGINEERING IN COUNTER TERRORISM PAKISTAN • Mother of global terrorism. • Military-ISI need continued hostility . • Sponsor terrorism / asymmetric war – LeT covert wing of ISI. • Terror infrastructure in POK intact.
    [Show full text]
  • (AVF0016) Written Evidence: HCDC Inquiry Progress in Delivering The
    (AVF0016) Written evidence submitted by the Ministry of Defence HCDC Inquiry: Progress in delivering the British Army’s armoured vehicle Executive Summary Armoured Fighting Vehicles (AFVs) are at the heart of the British Army’s contribution to high intensity warfighting and therefore integral to deterrence and a vital part of an integrated defence system. We face a range of threats that includes resurgent and developing powers and violent extremism, and while these threats have diversified AFVs continue to be critical to Defence’s ability to deliver hard power and underpin our credibility in the land environment. The Army’s modernisation programme seeks to ensure that we retain the appropriate capabilities to meet and deter the threat. AFVs deliver persistent offensive fighting power that can directly, or indirectly through deterrence, change the actions of an adversary or enemy, alongside other land and wider defence capabilities, to impose our will. Armour provides credible deterrence and increases tactical options. The objective of the Army’s modernisation programme is to not only create a fleet of highly advanced digitised platforms able to deal with future challenges, but one that will adapt to emerging threats through iterative enhancements and upgrades. Modernised AFVs, networked and integrated into a wider system that includes precision deep fires, air defence, and layered ISR, will transform the way we fight and provide the necessary core for a world-class, credible force. Underpinned by enhanced information sharing through the digital backbone integrated Land and Joint assets will be used more safely, effectively and with greater freedom of action. In the longer term and building on current experimentation plans, upgraded, digitised and networked AFVs will be a critical link to the ‘autonomous’ future of armoured capability through human and machine teaming.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-34, "Engineer Doctrine for Joint Operations"
    Joint Publication 3-34 Engineer Doctrine for Joint Operations 5 July 2000 PREFACE 1. Scope 3. Application This publication provides the guidance and a. Doctrine and guidance established in procedures necessary to plan, coordinate, and this publication apply to the commanders conduct timely and tailored joint engineer of combatant commands, subunified operations across the range of military commands, joint task forces, and subordinate operations. components of these commands. These principles and guidance also may apply when 2. Purpose significant forces of one Service are attached to forces of another Service or when This publication has been prepared under significant forces of one Service support the direction of the Chairman of the Joint forces of another Service. Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth doctrine to govern the joint activities and performance of the b. The guidance in this publication is Armed Forces of the United States in joint authoritative; as such, this doctrine (or JTTP) operations and provides the doctrinal basis for will be followed except when, in the judgment US military involvement in multinational and of the commander, exceptional circumstances interagency operations. It provides military dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between guidance for the exercise of authority by the contents of this publication and the combatant commanders and other joint contents of Service publications, this force commanders and prescribes doctrine for publication will take precedence for the joint operations and training. It provides activities of joint forces unless the Chairman military guidance for use by the Armed Forces of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in in preparing their appropriate plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Structures Listing Selection Guides Summary
    Military Structures Listing Selection Guides Summary Historic England’s twenty listing selection guides help to define which historic buildings are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. Listing has been in place since 1947 and operates under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. If a building is felt to meet the necessary standards, it is added to the List. This decision is taken by the Government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). These selection guides were originally produced by English Heritage in 2011: slightly revised versions are now being published by its successor body, Historic England. The DCMS‘ Principles of Selection for Listing Buildings set out the over-arching criteria of special architectural or historic interest required for listing and the guides provide more detail of relevant considerations for determining such interest for particular building types. See https:// www.gov.uk/government/publications/principles-of-selection-for-listing-buildings. Each guide falls into two halves. The first defines the types of structures included in it, before going on to give a brisk overview of their characteristics and how these developed through time, with notice of the main architects and representative examples of buildings. The second half of the guide sets out the particular tests in terms of its architectural or historic interest a building has to meet if it is to be listed. A select bibliography gives suggestions for further reading. This guide outlines our approaches to listing England’s military buildings and structures, some of the most eloquent witnesses to the impact of world events on our national story.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Counter-Terrorism Cooperation with Partners
    Emerging Security Challenges Division Counter-Terrorism Section Information Day NATO’s Counter-Terrorism Cooperation with Partners Report 15 November 2016 Luns Theatre - NATO HQ s r e n t r a P h t i w n o i t a r e p o o C m s ri ro er -T er nt Cou NATO’s Final Report on NATO’s Counter-Terrorism Cooperation with Partners 15 November 2016, NATO Headquarters Brussels This important familiarization event, run by the Emerging Security Challenges Division’s Counter Terrorism section, set out the range of opportunities available to partners for collaboration with NATO in the field of counter-terrorism (CT). This was the second event of its kind, the first having been held in 2014. N Following a dynamic and thought-provoking opening s session, the event covered CT-related options including A r information sharing, capacity building, scientific cooperation e T and specific capability development. Two partner nations n gave first-hand accounts of CT cooperation with NATO. O rt ’s a Representatives of International Organisations spoke of C P their differing mandates and their activities which represent complementary opportunities for NATO’s partner nations. ou ith n w The final interactive session put partners and NATO Points te n of Contact in touch. Individual nations are now encouraged r-T io to identify specific collaborative CT activities for inclusion e at in their cooperation programme with NATO. rrorism Cooper 3 WELCOME ADDRESS ‘Cooperative Security & the Fight Against Terrorism’ by Ambassador Sorin Ducaru, Assistant Secretary General, Emerging Security Challenges Division, NATO Ambassador Ducaru opened the event by welcoming participants including the majority of NATO’s partner nations (29 of 41 having registered), many Allies and several international organisations.
    [Show full text]