DOCSLIB.ORG

National Tracking Poll 190989

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Tracking Poll 190989 National Tracking Poll Project: 190989 N Size: 2488 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report September 27-30, 2019 Question Response Frequency Percentage P1 Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right Direction 869 35% Wrong Track 1619 65% Q172 Do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as President? Strongly Approve 588 24% Somewhat Approve 428 17% Somewhat Disapprove 285 11% Strongly Disapprove 1105 44% Don’t Know / No Opinion 83 3% Q172NET Do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as President? Total Approve 1015 41% Total Disapprove 1390 56% Don’t Know / No Opinion 83 3% P3 Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? Economic Issues – like taxes, wages, jobs, 604 24% unemployment, and spending Security Issues – like terrorism, foreign policy, and 483 19% border security Health Care Issues – like the 2010 health care law, 421 17% Medicaid, other challenges Seniors Issues – like Medicare and Social Security 365 15% Women’s Issues – like birth control, abortion, and equal 141 6% pay Education Issues – like school standards, class sizes, 141 6% school choice, and student loans Energy Issues – like carbon emissions, cost of 178 7% electricity/gasoline, or renewables Other: 155 6% Page | 1 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1 How likely is it that you will vote in the 2020 presidential primary or caucus in your state? Absolutely certain to vote 1797 72% Very likely 318 13% About 50-50 237 10% Not too likely 63 3% Not likely at all 73 3% POL2 Now, thinking about the 2020 presidential primary or caucus in your state, would you vote in the Democratic primary or caucus, the Republican primary or caucus, or are you not likely to vote in a primary or caucus at all? (N=2,352) Vote in Democratic primary or caucus 1079 46% Vote in Republican primary or caucus 838 36% Not likely to vote in primary or caucus 100 4% Don’t know / No opinion 336 14% POL3 Do you think the Republican party should nominate Donald Trump as the party’s candidate for president in 2020, or do you think the Republican party should nominate a different candidate for president in 2020? (N=838) Strongly support Trump’s nomination 580 69% Somewhat support Trump’s nomination 125 15% Somewhat support a different candidate’s nomination 43 5% Strongly support a different candidate’s nomination 64 8% Don’t know / No opinion 25 3% POL4_1 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Michael Bennet Very Favorable 52 2% Somewhat Favorable 191 8% Somewhat Unfavorable 126 5% Very Unfavorable 267 11% Heard Of, No Opinion 617 25% Never Heard Of 1234 50% Page | 2 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL4_2 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Joe Biden Very Favorable 470 19% Somewhat Favorable 662 27% Somewhat Unfavorable 316 13% Very Unfavorable 717 29% Heard Of, No Opinion 228 9% Never Heard Of 96 4% POL4_3 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Cory Booker Very Favorable 157 6% Somewhat Favorable 435 17% Somewhat Unfavorable 200 8% Very Unfavorable 548 22% Heard Of, No Opinion 433 17% Never Heard Of 716 29% POL4_4 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Steve Bullock Very Favorable 29 1% Somewhat Favorable 172 7% Somewhat Unfavorable 137 5% Very Unfavorable 255 10% Heard Of, No Opinion 614 25% Never Heard Of 1281 51% Page | 3 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL4_5 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Pete Buttigieg Very Favorable 232 9% Somewhat Favorable 366 15% Somewhat Unfavorable 157 6% Very Unfavorable 451 18% Heard Of, No Opinion 418 17% Never Heard Of 864 35% POL4_6 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Julian Castro Very Favorable 89 4% Somewhat Favorable 317 13% Somewhat Unfavorable 226 9% Very Unfavorable 514 21% Heard Of, No Opinion 556 22% Never Heard Of 785 32% POL4_7 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ John Delaney Very Favorable 42 2% Somewhat Favorable 179 7% Somewhat Unfavorable 166 7% Very Unfavorable 288 12% Heard Of, No Opinion 716 29% Never Heard Of 1098 44% Page | 4 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL4_8 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Tulsi Gabbard Very Favorable 80 3% Somewhat Favorable 260 10% Somewhat Unfavorable 201 8% Very Unfavorable 324 13% Heard Of, No Opinion 463 19% Never Heard Of 1160 47% POL4_9 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Kamala Harris Very Favorable 260 10% Somewhat Favorable 457 18% Somewhat Unfavorable 210 8% Very Unfavorable 650 26% Heard Of, No Opinion 329 13% Never Heard Of 583 23% POL4_10 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President. It is a long list, please take the time to go through the list carefully and give an individual answer for each name below.For each person, please indicate if you have a Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, or Very Unfavorable opinion of each individual.If you have heard of the person, but do not have an opinion, please mark ’Heard Of, No Opinion.’If you have not heard of the person, please mark ’Never Heard Of.’ Amy Klobuchar Very Favorable 84 3% Somewhat Favorable 349 14% Somewhat Unfavorable 176 7% Very Unfavorable 404 16% Heard Of, No Opinion 484 19% Never Heard Of 991 40% Page | 5 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL4_11 Next we will look at a list of Democratic candidates for President.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Florida's Tepid 2016 Senate Race, Minnesota and Wisconsin's Policy
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2015/10/17/floridas-tepid-2016-senate-race-minnesota-and-wisconsins-policy-battle-and-hawaiis- homeless-emergency-us-state-blog-round-up-for-10-16-october/ Florida’s tepid 2016 Senate race, Minnesota and Wisconsin’s policy battle, and Hawaii’s homeless emergency: US state blog round up for 10 – 16 October USAPP Managing Editor, Chris Gilson, looks at the week in US state blogging. Click here for our weekly roundup of national blogs. Northeast On Tuesday this week, NH Labor News writes that reforms to the state budget of the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) are needed. They say that over the past thirteen years, the TANF has only increased 12 percent, despite child care and housing costs for TANF families rising at a much higher rate over the same period. RIPR says on Friday that it may well be time for Ocean State’s former governor, Lincoln Chafee to give up on his 2016 presidential ambitions, after what they describe as a ‘bumbling appearance’ during this week’s Democratic debate. They also comment that while some of Chafee’s critics have accused him of embarrassing Rhode Island, there are many other politicians from the state who have landed in jail or made the state a national laughing stock. In the Constitution State this week, My Left Nutmeg has the news that a recent poll has shown that Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy isn’t very popular; voters disapprove of the job he’s doing 58 to 32 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Is Only Leading Dem to Top Trump in Ohio, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Former V.P
    Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director (203) 535-6203 Rubenstein Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JULY 25, 2019 BIDEN IS ONLY LEADING DEM TO TOP TRUMP IN OHIO, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; FORMER V.P. HAS BIG LEAD IN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY Former Vice President Joseph Biden leads President Donald Trump 50 – 42 percent in the critical swing state of Ohio, the only leading Democratic candidate to top the Republican incumbent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. The other leading Democratic contenders each are locked in a dead heat with President Trump, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University Poll finds: 46 percent for Trump to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders with 45 percent; Trump at 46 percent to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 45 percent; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and California Sen. Kamala Harris; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg; 44 percent for Trump to 43 percent for New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. Women, black voters and independent voters give Biden his lead in the matchup with Trump. Biden leads 53 – 40 percent among women, as men are split with 46 percent for Biden and 45 percent for Trump. White voters are divided, with 48 percent for Trump and 45 percent for Biden. Black voters go Democratic 84 – 8 percent. Independent voters go to Biden 55 – 32 percent. Republicans back Trump 86 – 10 percent as Biden leads 96 – 2 percent among Democrats. “Former Vice President Joseph Biden calls himself a blue-collar guy. With Ohio certainly a blue-collar state, it is no surprise he is the Democrat who runs best against President Donald Trump and is solidly ahead in the Democratic primary in the Buckeye State,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Handout As an Adobe Acrobat
    AEI Election Watch 2006 October 11, 2006 Bush’s Ratings Congress’s Ratings Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 39 56 CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 28 63 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 37 59 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 24 68 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 39 60 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 32 66 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 34 60 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 27 64 Newsweek Oct. 5-6 33 59 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 31 57 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 36 57 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 27 69 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 38 59 Diag.-Hotline Sep. 24-26 28 65 PSRA/Pew Sep. 21-Oct. 4 37 53 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 30 57 NBC/WSJ Sep. 30-Oct. 2 39 56 Fox/OD Sep. 12-13 29 53 Fox/OD Sep. 26-27 42 54 NBC/WSJ (RV) Sep. 8-11 20 65 Diag-Hotline Sep. 24-26 42 56 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 45 52 Final October approval rating for the president and Final October approval rating for Congress and number of House seats won/lost by the president’s number of House seats won/lost by the president’s party party Gallup/CNN/USA Today Gallup/CNN/USA Today Number Number Approve of seats Approve of seats Oct. 2002 67 +8 Oct. 2002 50 +8 Oct. 1998 65 +5 Oct. 1998 44 +5 Oct. 1994 48 -52 Oct. 1994 23 -52 Oct. 1990 48 -9 Oct. 1990 24 -9 Oct. 1986 62 -5 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • All Top Dems Beat Trump As Voters' Economic Outlook
    Mary Snow, Polling Analyst (203) 506-8202 Doug Schwartz, Director (203) 582-5201 FOR RELEASE: AUGUST 28, 2019 ALL TOP DEMS BEAT TRUMP AS VOTERS’ ECONOMIC OUTLOOK DIMS QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; DEM PRIMARY STAYS STABLE WITH BIDEN HOLDING THE LEAD If the 2020 presidential election were held today, 54 percent of registered voters say that they would vote for former Vice President Joe Biden, while only 38 percent would vote for President Trump. Matchups against other top Democrats show: • Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders topping Trump 53 – 39 percent; • Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren ahead of Trump 52 – 40 percent; • California Sen. Kamala Harris beating Trump 51 – 40 percent; • South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg leading with 49 percent to Trump’s 40 percent. Looking at all of the matchups, President Trump is stuck between 38 and 40 percent of the vote. These low numbers may partly be explained by a lack of support among white women, a key voting bloc that voted for Trump in the 2016 election. Today, white women go for the Democratic candidate by double digits in every scenario. Though it is a long 14 months until Election Day, Trump’s vulnerability among this important voting group does not bode well for him. “In hypothetical matchups between President Trump and the top five Democratic presidential candidates, one key number is 40,” said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Mary Snow. “It’s the ceiling of support for Trump, no matter the candidate. It hovers close to his job approval rating, which has stayed in a tight range since being elected.” Voters say 56 – 38 percent that they disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president, compared to the 54 – 40 percent disapproval he received a month ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Completeandleft
    MEN WOMEN 1. JA Jason Aldean=American singer=188,534=33 Julia Alexandratou=Model, singer and actress=129,945=69 Jin Akanishi=Singer-songwriter, actor, voice actor, Julie Anne+San+Jose=Filipino actress and radio host=31,926=197 singer=67,087=129 John Abraham=Film actor=118,346=54 Julie Andrews=Actress, singer, author=55,954=162 Jensen Ackles=American actor=453,578=10 Julie Adams=American actress=54,598=166 Jonas Armstrong=Irish, Actor=20,732=288 Jenny Agutter=British film and television actress=72,810=122 COMPLETEandLEFT Jessica Alba=actress=893,599=3 JA,Jack Anderson Jaimie Alexander=Actress=59,371=151 JA,James Agee June Allyson=Actress=28,006=290 JA,James Arness Jennifer Aniston=American actress=1,005,243=2 JA,Jane Austen Julia Ann=American pornographic actress=47,874=184 JA,Jean Arthur Judy Ann+Santos=Filipino, Actress=39,619=212 JA,Jennifer Aniston Jean Arthur=Actress=45,356=192 JA,Jessica Alba JA,Joan Van Ark Jane Asher=Actress, author=53,663=168 …….. JA,Joan of Arc José González JA,John Adams Janelle Monáe JA,John Amos Joseph Arthur JA,John Astin James Arthur JA,John James Audubon Jann Arden JA,John Quincy Adams Jessica Andrews JA,Jon Anderson John Anderson JA,Julie Andrews Jefferson Airplane JA,June Allyson Jane's Addiction Jacob ,Abbott ,Author ,Franconia Stories Jim ,Abbott ,Baseball ,One-handed MLB pitcher John ,Abbott ,Actor ,The Woman in White John ,Abbott ,Head of State ,Prime Minister of Canada, 1891-93 James ,Abdnor ,Politician ,US Senator from South Dakota, 1981-87 John ,Abizaid ,Military ,C-in-C, US Central Command, 2003-
    [Show full text]
  • EMBARGOED for RELEASE: Tuesday, August 20 at 6:00 A.M
    1 Braxton Way Suite 125 Glen Mills, PA 19342 484-840-4300 www.ssrs.com OVERVIEW The study was conducted for CNN via telephone by SSRS, an independent research company. Interviews were conducted from August 15-18, 2019 among a sample of 1,001 respondents. The landline total respondents were 351 and there were 650 cell phone respondents. The margin of sampling error for total respondents is +/- 3.7 at the 95% confidence level. The design effect is 1.46. More information about SSRS can be obtained by visiting www.ssrs.com. Question text noted in parentheses was rotated or randomized. Unless otherwise noted, results beginning with the March 31-April 2, 2006 survey and ending with the April 22-25, 2017 survey are from surveys conducted by ORC International. Results before March 31, 2006 are from surveys conducted by Gallup. NOTE ABOUT CROSSTABS Interviews were conducted among a representative sample of the adult population, age 18 or older, of the United States. Members of demographic groups not shown in the published crosstabs are represented in the results for each question in the poll. Crosstabs on the pages that follow only include results for subgroups with a minimum n=125 unweighted cases. Results for subgroups with fewer than n=125 unweighted cases are not displayed and instead are denoted with "SN" because samples of that size carry larger margins of sampling error and can be too small to be projectable with confidence to their true values in the population. EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Tuesday, August 20 at 6:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • BIDEN HOLDS COMMANDING LEAD in ILLINOIS on EVE of SECOND DEBATE Biden Leads Nearest Competitor Sanders by More Than 2-1 Margin in Illinois
    BIDEN HOLDS COMMANDING LEAD IN ILLINOIS ON EVE OF SECOND DEBATE Biden Leads Nearest Competitor Sanders By More Than 2-1 Margin in Illinois July 30, 2019 For more information For immediate release Contact 312-388-1782 Former Vice President Joe Biden holds a commanding lead in Illinois heading into the second presidential debate, according to a new poll. Biden has 36.1% of the vote, with Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in second place with 15.2%. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is in third place with 12.8%, while South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg (9.3%), and California Senator Kamala Harris (8.6%) round out the top tier of candidates. The poll, conducted between July 26th-29th, of 1200 Democratic primary voters across Illinois, is part of The Illinois Poll, a semi monthly survey by Victory Research, an independent polling company based in Chicago. The poll has a margin of error of 2.83% and was conducted by live callers. Respondents answered on land lines (502) and cell phones (698). Victory Research has no client in the Presidential campaign. Victory Research was the most accurate Illinois polling company for the 2018 gubernatorial election. The final Illinois poll of the 2018 Illinois Governor election published the day before the election showed Governor Prizker’s lead over former Governor Rauner at 16%. The actual margin of victory was 15.7%. Biden’s lead is built on a very strong showing among African-American voters. More than half of African- American voters (54.2%) choose President Obama’s running mate as their first choice for President, according to the poll.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University/Boston Globe
    SUPRC/Boston Globe August 2019 FINAL NH DEM PRIMARY AUGUST Region: (N=500) n % West/North ------------------------------------------------------- 131 26.20 Central ------------------------------------------------------------ 127 25.40 Hillsborough ------------------------------------------------------ 137 27.40 Rockingham ------------------------------------------------------ 105 21.00 INTRO SECTION> Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk (SUFF-ick) University and I would like to get your opinions on some questions about the upcoming Democratic Primary in New Hampshire. Would you be willing to spend five minutes answering some brief questions? (quota) A. Are you a resident of New Hampshire? (N=500) n % Yes ----------------------------------------------------------------- 500 100.00 1. Gender (N=500) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 224 44.80 Female ------------------------------------------------------------ 276 55.20 2. Thinking about the Democratic Primary for President coming up in six months, how likely are you to vote in the Democratic Primary – would you say you are very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not at all likely to vote in the Democratic Primary? (N=500) n % Very likely--------------------------------------------------------- 448 89.60 Somewhat likely -------------------------------------------------- 52 10.40 3. Are you currently enrolled as a Democrat, Republican, or Undeclared/Independent? (N=500) n % Democrat ---------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Notice to Candidates * Incumbent March 3, 2020, Presidential Primary Election Page 1 President Don Blankenship American Independent
    TO ALL CANDIDATES FOR THE OFFICE HEREINAFTER INDICATED Below is the name, contact information, and political party of each person who will appear on the March 3, 2020, Presidential Primary Election ballot. A Certified List of Candidates will be available on December 26, 2019. ALEX PADILLA December 20, 2019 SECRETARY OF STATE CANDIDATES FOR MARCH 3, 2020, PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION President Max Abramson Libertarian 14 Charles Henry Way Seabrook, NH 03874 Robert Ardini Republican 150 50th Ave Apt 520 Long Island City, NY 11101 Ken Armstrong Libertarian 3972 Edgewater Vermilion, OH 44089 Dan Behrman Libertarian 1930 Village Center Cir #3-4636 Las Vegas, NV 89134 Michael Bennet Democratic 2830 E 7th Ave Pkwy Denver, CO 80206 Joseph R. Biden Democratic 1209 Barley Mill Rd Wilmington, DE 19807 Notice to Candidates * Incumbent March 3, 2020, Presidential Primary Election Page 1 President Don Blankenship American Independent 18 Crystal Acres Matewan, WV 25678 Michael R. Bloomberg Democratic 17 E 79th St New York, NY 10021 Cory Booker Democratic 19 Longworth St Newark, NJ 07102 Mosie Boyd Democratic 2008 S T St Fort Smith, AR 72901 Pete Buttigieg Democratic PO Box 1226 South Bend, IN 46624 Julián Castro Democratic PO Box 501 San Antonio, TX 78292 Phil Collins American Independent 1500 S Ardmore #507 Villa Park, IL 60181 Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente American Independent 5440 Morehouse Dr Ste 4000 San Diego, CA 92121 5440 Morehouse Dr Ste 4000 Republican San Diego, CA 92121 Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente III Democratic 17292 Camino de Montecillo Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 John K. Delaney Democratic 8921 Durham Dr Potomac, MD 20854 Keenan Wallace Dunham Libertarian 142 Westhaven Dr #9D Myrtle Beach, SC 29579 Notice to Candidates * Incumbent March 3, 2020, Presidential Primary Election Page 2 President Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Truthers--He's Gay and His BC Is a Total Forgery
    Obama truthers--he's gay and his BC is a total forgery NewsFollowUp.com Franklin Scandal Omaha search pictorial index sitemap home .... OBAMA TOP 10 FRAUD .... The Right and Left Obama Truthers Obama's public personal records The Right and are a total fraud. We agree. It's most importantly a blackmail issue and the public's duty to uncover deception. Left Obama MORE and Donald Trump: Trump's video, $5 million to charities if he releases personal records. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgOq9pBkY0I&feature=youtu.be&hd=1 Truthers Selective Service card VP Joe Biden Purple Hotel Spencer, Bland & Young Limbaugh, Corsi more 14 Expert Reports on technical analysis of the Obama public records Jerome Corsi believes Obama is Gay. Rush Limbaugh's Straight Entertainment says Obama is gay. HillBuzz interview with Larry Sinclair (gay tryst with Obama) Israel Science & Technology says Obama's birth certificate is a forgery based on expert analysis of the typography and layout of elements in the long-form birth certificate. ... layers Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio (Arizona) determined in 2012 there is probable cause to suspect the document released by the White House as Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery MORE News for the 99% ...................................Refresh F5...archive home NFU MOST ACTIVE PA Go to Alphabetic list 50th Anniversary of JFK assassination Academic Freedom "Event of a Lifetime" at the Fess Conference Parker Double Tree Inn. Obama Death List JFKSantaBarbara. Rothschild Timeline Bush / Clinton Body Count Back to Obama Home Obama Gay Chicago Spencer, Bland and Young Examiner Who is Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Chicago 2012 Campaign Soetoro? It is alleged that Barack Obama has spent $950,000 to $1.7 million with 11 law firms in 12 Lawsuit dismissed below states to block disclosure of his personal records; which includes birth information, K-12 education, Stuart Levine, Ashley Turton below Occidental College, Columbia University, and Clinton, Sinclair Harvard Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of the Supreme Court's Boumediene Decision For
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 110–166] IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT’S BOUMEDIENE DECISION FOR DETAINEES AT GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA: NON-GOVERNMENTAL PERSPECTIVE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION HEARING HELD JULY 30, 2008 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 45–826 WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS IKE SKELTON, Missouri, Chairman JOHN SPRATT, South Carolina DUNCAN HUNTER, California SOLOMON P. ORTIZ, Texas JIM SAXTON, New Jersey GENE TAYLOR, Mississippi JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii TERRY EVERETT, Alabama SILVESTRE REYES, Texas ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland VIC SNYDER, Arkansas HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, California ADAM SMITH, Washington MAC THORNBERRY, Texas LORETTA SANCHEZ, California WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina ROBIN HAYES, North Carolina ELLEN O. TAUSCHER, California W. TODD AKIN, Missouri ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia ROBERT ANDREWS, New Jersey JEFF MILLER, Florida SUSAN A. DAVIS, California JOE WILSON, South Carolina RICK LARSEN, Washington FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey JIM COOPER, Tennessee TOM COLE, Oklahoma JIM MARSHALL, Georgia ROB BISHOP, Utah MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio MARK E. UDALL, Colorado JOHN KLINE, Minnesota DAN BOREN, Oklahoma PHIL GINGREY, Georgia BRAD ELLSWORTH, Indiana MIKE ROGERS, Alabama NANCY BOYDA, Kansas TRENT FRANKS, Arizona PATRICK J. MURPHY, Pennsylvania BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania HANK JOHNSON, Georgia THELMA DRAKE, Virginia CAROL SHEA-PORTER, New Hampshire CATHY MCMORRIS RODGERS, Washington JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut K.
    [Show full text]
  • UT-Austin/Texas Tribune – Texas Statewide Survey, Democratic Primary Voters, September 2019 Page 1 of 21 Most Important Problem
    University of Texas / Texas Tribune Democratic Primary Poll Texas Statewide Survey Field Dates: August 29-September 8, 2019 N=552 Democratic Identifiers Margin of error: +/- 4.17% (5.1% adjusted for weighting) unless otherwise noted1 Interest and Engagement Q1. Are you registered to vote in the state of Texas? 1. Yes, registered 100% QPRIMARY. If the 2020 primary elections for President were held today, would you vote in [RANDOMIZE ‘the Republican primary’, ‘the Democratic primary’] the Republican primary, the Democratic primary, or wouldn’t you vote in either primary? [RANDOMIZE 1-2] 1. Republican primary [TERMINATE] 2. Democratic primary 100% 3. Wouldn’t vote in either primary [TERMINATE] 4. Don’t know [TERMINATE] Q2. How closely are you following the Democratic Presidential primary race? 1. Very closely 45% 2. Somewhat closely 38 3. Not too closely 14 4. Not at all closely 3 Q3. How enthusiastic would you say you are about voting in the 2020 election? 1. Extremely enthusiastic 49% 2. Very enthusiastic 23 3. Somewhat enthusiastic 15 4. Not too enthusiastic 8 5. Not at all enthusiastic 3 6. Don’t know/No opinion 1 1In calculating the margin of error (MOE) for the survey, we provide two calculations, one that compensates for the relative standard deviation of the weights and one that does not. Without taking the variance of the weights into account, the margin of error for the full sample is 4.17%. To compensate for the additional uncertainty from weighting, we apply a multiplier derived from the coefficient of variation of the weights: sqrt(1+CV^2), where CV=sd(weights)/mean(weights).
    [Show full text]