DOCSLIB.ORG

Precinct Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Precinct Results Official results Precinct Results Ionia County, Michigan Registered Voters 2020 March Primary Presidential Primary Election 9549 of 44653 = 21.38 % Run Time 10:27 AM Precincts Reporting Run Date 03/16/2020 3/10/2020 31 of 31 = 100.00 % Page 1 of 40 Berlin Township Precinct 1 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Republican Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Mark Sanford 3 1.88% 0 0.00% 3 1.88% Donald J. Trump 146 91.25% 0 0.00% 146 91.25% Joe Walsh 3 1.88% 0 0.00% 3 1.88% Bill Weld 2 1.25% 0 0.00% 2 1.25% Uncommitted 6 3.75% 0 0.00% 6 3.75% Cast Votes: 160 100.00% 0 0.00% 160 100.00% Undervotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Overvotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Democratic Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Michael Bennet 1 0.50% 0 0.00% 1 0.50% Joe Biden 111 55.78% 0 0.00% 111 55.78% Michael R. 10 5.03% 0 0.00% 10 5.03% Bloomberg Cory Booker 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Pete Buttigieg 6 3.02% 0 0.00% 6 3.02% Julian Castro 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% John Delaney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Tulsi Gabbard 1 0.50% 0 0.00% 1 0.50% Amy Klobuchar 2 1.01% 0 0.00% 2 1.01% Bernie Sanders 66 33.17% 0 0.00% 66 33.17% Joe Sestak 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Tom Steyer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Elizabeth Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Marianne Williamson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Andrew Yang 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Uncommitted 2 1.01% 0 0.00% 2 1.01% Cast Votes: 199 100.00% 0 0.00% 199 100.00% Undervotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Overvotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Official results Precinct Results Ionia County, Michigan Registered Voters 2020 March Primary Presidential Primary Election 9549 of 44653 = 21.38 % Run Time 10:27 AM Precincts Reporting Run Date 03/16/2020 3/10/2020 31 of 31 = 100.00 % Page 2 of 40 Boston Township Precinct 1 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Republican Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Mark Sanford 1 0.62% 0 0.00% 1 0.62% Donald J. Trump 151 93.21% 0 0.00% 151 93.21% Joe Walsh 1 0.62% 0 0.00% 1 0.62% Bill Weld 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Uncommitted 8 4.94% 0 0.00% 8 4.94% Cast Votes: 161 99.38% 0 0.00% 161 99.38% Undervotes: 1 0.62% 0 0.00% 1 0.62% Overvotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Democratic Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Michael Bennet 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Joe Biden 127 54.98% 0 0.00% 127 54.98% Michael R. 7 3.03% 0 0.00% 7 3.03% Bloomberg Cory Booker 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Pete Buttigieg 6 2.60% 0 0.00% 6 2.60% Julian Castro 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% John Delaney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Tulsi Gabbard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Amy Klobuchar 3 1.30% 0 0.00% 3 1.30% Bernie Sanders 82 35.50% 0 0.00% 82 35.50% Joe Sestak 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Tom Steyer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Elizabeth Warren 5 2.16% 0 0.00% 5 2.16% Marianne Williamson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Andrew Yang 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Uncommitted 1 0.43% 0 0.00% 1 0.43% Cast Votes: 231 100.00% 0 0.00% 231 100.00% Undervotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Overvotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Official results Precinct Results Ionia County, Michigan Registered Voters 2020 March Primary Presidential Primary Election 9549 of 44653 = 21.38 % Run Time 10:27 AM Precincts Reporting Run Date 03/16/2020 3/10/2020 31 of 31 = 100.00 % Page 3 of 40 Boston Township Precinct 2 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Republican Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Mark Sanford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Donald J. Trump 139 96.53% 0 0.00% 139 96.53% Joe Walsh 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Bill Weld 3 2.08% 0 0.00% 3 2.08% Uncommitted 1 0.69% 0 0.00% 1 0.69% Cast Votes: 143 99.31% 0 0.00% 143 99.31% Undervotes: 1 0.69% 0 0.00% 1 0.69% Overvotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Democratic Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Michael Bennet 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Joe Biden 86 48.86% 0 0.00% 86 48.86% Michael R. 10 5.68% 0 0.00% 10 5.68% Bloomberg Cory Booker 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Pete Buttigieg 1 0.57% 0 0.00% 1 0.57% Julian Castro 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% John Delaney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Tulsi Gabbard 1 0.57% 0 0.00% 1 0.57% Amy Klobuchar 1 0.57% 0 0.00% 1 0.57% Bernie Sanders 71 40.34% 0 0.00% 71 40.34% Joe Sestak 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Tom Steyer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Elizabeth Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Marianne Williamson 3 1.70% 0 0.00% 3 1.70% Andrew Yang 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Uncommitted 2 1.14% 0 0.00% 2 1.14% Cast Votes: 175 99.43% 0 0.00% 175 99.43% Undervotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Overvotes: 1 0.57% 0 0.00% 1 0.57% Official results Precinct Results Ionia County, Michigan Registered Voters 2020 March Primary Presidential Primary Election 9549 of 44653 = 21.38 % Run Time 10:27 AM Precincts Reporting Run Date 03/16/2020 3/10/2020 31 of 31 = 100.00 % Page 4 of 40 Boston Township Precinct 3 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Republican Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Mark Sanford 1 0.79% 0 0.00% 1 0.79% Donald J. Trump 116 92.06% 0 0.00% 116 92.06% Joe Walsh 1 0.79% 0 0.00% 1 0.79% Bill Weld 2 1.59% 0 0.00% 2 1.59% Uncommitted 6 4.76% 0 0.00% 6 4.76% Cast Votes: 126 100.00% 0 0.00% 126 100.00% Undervotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Overvotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Democratic Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Michael Bennet 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Joe Biden 84 45.90% 0 0.00% 84 45.90% Michael R. 3 1.64% 0 0.00% 3 1.64% Bloomberg Cory Booker 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Pete Buttigieg 2 1.09% 0 0.00% 2 1.09% Julian Castro 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% John Delaney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Tulsi Gabbard 3 1.64% 0 0.00% 3 1.64% Amy Klobuchar 2 1.09% 0 0.00% 2 1.09% Bernie Sanders 81 44.26% 0 0.00% 81 44.26% Joe Sestak 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Tom Steyer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Elizabeth Warren 4 2.19% 0 0.00% 4 2.19% Marianne Williamson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Andrew Yang 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Uncommitted 4 2.19% 0 0.00% 4 2.19% Cast Votes: 183 100.00% 0 0.00% 183 100.00% Undervotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Overvotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Official results Precinct Results Ionia County, Michigan Registered Voters 2020 March Primary Presidential Primary Election 9549 of 44653 = 21.38 % Run Time 10:27 AM Precincts Reporting Run Date 03/16/2020 3/10/2020 31 of 31 = 100.00 % Page 5 of 40 Campbell Township Precinct 1 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Republican Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Mark Sanford 2 1.06% 0 0.00% 2 1.06% Donald J. Trump 181 95.77% 0 0.00% 181 95.77% Joe Walsh 1 0.53% 0 0.00% 1 0.53% Bill Weld 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Uncommitted 5 2.65% 0 0.00% 5 2.65% Cast Votes: 189 100.00% 0 0.00% 189 100.00% Undervotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Overvotes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Democratic Party - Vote for not more than 1 Choice Party Precinct Voting ABSENTEE Total Michael Bennet 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Joe Biden 104 55.61% 0 0.00% 104 55.61% Michael R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Introduction
    TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Teaching, Research & International Policy (TRIP) Project Global Research Institute (GRI) https://trip.wm.edu/home Principal Investigators: Susan Peterson, William & Mary Ryan Powers, University of Georgia Michael J. Tierney, William & Mary Data Contacts: Eric Parajon or Emily Jackson Phone: (757) 221-1466 Email: i [email protected] Methodology: We attempted to contact all international relations (IR) scholars in the U.S. We define IR scholars as individuals who are employed at a college or university in a political science department or professional school and who teach or conduct research on issues that cross international borders. Of the 4,752 scholars across the U.S. that we contacted, 971 responded. The resulting response rate is approximately 20.43 percent. The poll was open 10/30/2019-12/14/2019. Our sample is roughly similar to the broader International Relations scholar population in terms of gender, academic rank and university type. Our sample includes a higher percentage of men and a higher percentage of tenured and tenure track faculty than the overall scholar population. Introduction By Emily Jackson, Eric Parajon, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney We are pleased to share the results of the 12th Teaching, Research and International Policy (TRIP) Snap Poll, fielded with the support of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Our polls provide real-time data in the wake of significant policy proposals, during international crises, and on emerging foreign policy debates. In this poll, we asked questions on the 2020 Presidential Election, President Trump’s foreign policy actions, and impeachment.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks E1015 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS
    May 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks E1015 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS THE COURTS THWART THE EPA'S doing nothing at all and shutting down an CONGRATULATING THE MEN'S POWER GRAB industry. The governing case (Lead Indus- VOLLEYBALL TEAM OF BYU tries Association v. EPA) gave the EPA this broad power because it was issued by the HON. MICHAEL G. OXLEY D.C. Circuit five days before the Supreme HON. CHRIS CANNON OF OHIO Court's benzene decision, and thus was unaf- OF UTAH IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES fected by the latter ruling. But it was only a IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES matter of time before the EPA's power would Wednesday, May 19, 1999 collide with the Supreme Court's limita- Wednesday, May 19, 1999 Mr. OXLEY. Mr. Speaker, many of us tions. Mr. CANNON. Mr. Speaker, on May 8, 1999 voiced serious concern when the U.S. Envi- For those subject to the EPA's unchecked in Los Angeles, Brigham Young University ronmental Protection Agency approved strict authority, the day of reckoning came none won its first-ever NCAA men's volleyball title in new NAAQs standards affecting ozone and too soon. EPA issued these rules in July 1997 despite: their first-ever NCAA Tournament appearance. particulate matter levels. We warned that EPA They finished the season with a record of 30± was not basing the standards on good Its science advisory board's admonition that the new ozone rule did not deal with 1, suffering their only loss to Long Beach science, and indeed questioned whether the any new significant risk not already ad- State whom they beat in the finals.
    [Show full text]
  • International Child Abduction: Implementa- Tion of the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduc- Tion
    INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION: IMPLEMENTA- TION OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUC- TION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Thursday, October 14, 1999 Serial No. 106±89 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 63±699 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 12:44 Jul 17, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 63699.TXT HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois CYNTHIA A. MCKINNEY, Georgia EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida PETER T. KING, New York PAT DANNER, Missouri STEVE CHABOT, Ohio EARL F. HILLIARD, Alabama MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South BRAD SHERMAN, California Carolina ROBERT WEXLER, Florida MATT SALMON, Arizona STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey AMO HOUGHTON, New York JIM DAVIS, Florida TOM CAMPBELL, California EARL POMEROY, North Dakota JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts KEVIN BRADY, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BARBARA LEE, California PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York GEORGE RADANOVICH, California JOSEPH M.
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality
    Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality JEFFREY W. STEMPEL* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION:M EN WITH NO REGRETS AND INADEQUATE CONCERN................... 2 II. CAPERTON V. MASSEY: JUDICIAL ERROR; WASTED RESOURCES; NEW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—AND LIGHT TREATMENT OF THE PERPETRATOR ............................................................................................... 10 A. The Underlying Action............................................................................... 10 B. The 2004 West Virginia Supreme Court Elections..................................... 12 C. Review and Recusal ................................................................................... 13 D. The Supreme Court Intervenes .................................................................. 16 E. Caperton’s Test for Determining When Recusal Is Required by the Due Process Clause ........................................................................ 17 F. Comparing the “Reasonable Question as to Impartiality” Standard for Nonconstitutional Recusal Under Federal and State Law to the “Serious Risk of Bias” Standard for Constitutional Due Process Under Caperton....................................... 19 G. The Dissenters’ Defense of Justice Benjamin—And Defective Judging ...................................................................................... 25 H. Enablers: Reluctance To Criticize Justice Benjamin................................. 28 * © 2010 Jeffrey W. Stempel. Doris S. & Theodore B. Lee Professor
    [Show full text]
  • 106Th Congress 239
    SOUTH CAROLINA 106th Congress 239 SOUTH CAROLINA (Population 1998, 3,836,000) SENATORS STROM THURMOND, Republican, of Aiken, SC; attorney and educator; committees: chair- man, Senate Armed Services Committee; ranking member, Judiciary; senior member, Veterans' Affairs. Family: born December 5, 1902, in Edgefield, SC; son of John William and Eleanor Gertrude (Strom) Thurmond; married Jean Crouch, 1947 (deceased January 6, 1960); married Nancy Moore, 1968; four children: Nancy Moore (deceased April 14, 1993), James Strom II, Juliana Gertrude, and Paul Reynolds. Education: 1923 graduate of Clemson University; studied law at night under his father, admitted to South Carolina bar, 1930, and admitted to practice in all federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Professional career: teacher and athletic coach (1923±29), county superintendent of education (1929±33), city attorney and county attor- ney (1930±38), State Senator (1933±38), circuit judge (1938±46), Governor of South Carolina (1947±51), serving as chairman of Southern Governors Conference (1950); practiced law in Edgefield, SC (1930±38) and in Aiken, SC (1951±55); adjunct professor of political science at Clemson University and distinguished lecturer at the Strom Thurmond Institute; member, President's Commission on Organized Crime and Commission on the Bicentennial of the Con- stitution. Military service: Reserve officer for 36 years; while serving as judge, volunteered for active duty in World War II the day war was declared against Germany; served with Head- quarters First Army (1942±46), American, European, and Pacific theaters; participated in Nor- mandy invasion with 82nd Airborne Division and landed on D-day; awarded 5 battle stars and 18 decorations, medals, and awards, including the Legion of Merit with Oak Leaf Cluster, Bronze Star Medal with ``V'', Purple Heart, Belgian Order of the Crown, and French Croix de Guerre; major general, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll
    The Economist/YouGov Poll Sample 1500 US Adult citizens Conducted August 3 - 6, 2019 Margin of Error ±2.6% 1. Would you say things in this country today are... Generally headed in the right direction . 35% Off on the wrong track . 54% Notsure ................................................................................10% 2. Have you heard mostly positive or mostly negative news stories about the economy, or have you not heard much news at all about the economy? Mostly positive . .32% Equally positive and negative . 33% Mostly negative . .18% Not heard much news about the economy at all . 16% 3. How serious a problem is unemployment in the U.S.? Very serious . 16% Somewhat serious . 33% A minor problem . 30% Not a problem . 14% Notsure .................................................................................8% 4. How serious a problem is unemployment in your LOCAL community? Very serious . 14% Somewhat serious . 26% A minor problem . 28% Not a problem . 20% Notsure ................................................................................11% 5. For you personally, which of the following do you consider the best measure of how the national economy is doing? The stock market index . 8% The unemployment rate and job reports . .28% The prices of goods and services you buy . 32% Your personal finances . .16% continued on the next page . 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll continued from previous page Don’t know . 16% 6. What is the current unemployment rate in the U.S.? Please tell us the percentage of adults who want to work that are currently unemployed and looking for a job. If you don’t know, please make your best guess. Less than 5% . .40% Between 5% and 6% . 14% Between 6% and 7% .
    [Show full text]
  • February 10, 2020 Kerri Kupec Director, Office of Public Affairs U.S
    February 10, 2020 Kerri Kupec Director, Office of Public Affairs U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Re: Request for Expedition of Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Ms. Kupec; Pursuant to Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 16.5(e)(2), Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) requests that you authorize the expedition of a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request CREW made today to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. I have enclosed a copy of this request. The FOIA request seeks copies of all records of communications between President Trump, White House employees, or personal attorneys to President Trump and the Department of Justice regarding investigations, requests for investigations, or other inquiries concerning concerning the family members, campaign committees, campaign staff, or businesses of past and current candidates for president in the 2020 election. The term “past and current candidates for president in the 2020 election” means Michael Bennet, Joe Biden, Michael Bloomberg, Cory Booker, Steve Bullock, Pete Buttigieg, Julian Castro, Bill De Blasio, Roque De La Fuente, John Delaney, Tulsi Gabbard, Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, John Hickenlooper, Jay Inslee, Amy Klobuchar, Wayne Meesam, Seth Moulton, Richard Ojeda, Beto O’Rourke, Deval Patrick, Tim Ryan, Bernie Sanders, Mark Sanford, Joe Sestak, Tom Steyer, Eric Swalwell, Joe Walsh, Elizabeth Warren, William (Bill) F. Weld, Marianne Williamson, and Andrew Yang. CREW has requested that DOJ search the records of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, including but not limited to the Office of United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Tepid 2016 Senate Race, Minnesota and Wisconsin's Policy
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2015/10/17/floridas-tepid-2016-senate-race-minnesota-and-wisconsins-policy-battle-and-hawaiis- homeless-emergency-us-state-blog-round-up-for-10-16-october/ Florida’s tepid 2016 Senate race, Minnesota and Wisconsin’s policy battle, and Hawaii’s homeless emergency: US state blog round up for 10 – 16 October USAPP Managing Editor, Chris Gilson, looks at the week in US state blogging. Click here for our weekly roundup of national blogs. Northeast On Tuesday this week, NH Labor News writes that reforms to the state budget of the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) are needed. They say that over the past thirteen years, the TANF has only increased 12 percent, despite child care and housing costs for TANF families rising at a much higher rate over the same period. RIPR says on Friday that it may well be time for Ocean State’s former governor, Lincoln Chafee to give up on his 2016 presidential ambitions, after what they describe as a ‘bumbling appearance’ during this week’s Democratic debate. They also comment that while some of Chafee’s critics have accused him of embarrassing Rhode Island, there are many other politicians from the state who have landed in jail or made the state a national laughing stock. In the Constitution State this week, My Left Nutmeg has the news that a recent poll has shown that Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy isn’t very popular; voters disapprove of the job he’s doing 58 to 32 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Is Only Leading Dem to Top Trump in Ohio, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Former V.P
    Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director (203) 535-6203 Rubenstein Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JULY 25, 2019 BIDEN IS ONLY LEADING DEM TO TOP TRUMP IN OHIO, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; FORMER V.P. HAS BIG LEAD IN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY Former Vice President Joseph Biden leads President Donald Trump 50 – 42 percent in the critical swing state of Ohio, the only leading Democratic candidate to top the Republican incumbent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. The other leading Democratic contenders each are locked in a dead heat with President Trump, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University Poll finds: 46 percent for Trump to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders with 45 percent; Trump at 46 percent to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 45 percent; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and California Sen. Kamala Harris; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg; 44 percent for Trump to 43 percent for New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. Women, black voters and independent voters give Biden his lead in the matchup with Trump. Biden leads 53 – 40 percent among women, as men are split with 46 percent for Biden and 45 percent for Trump. White voters are divided, with 48 percent for Trump and 45 percent for Biden. Black voters go Democratic 84 – 8 percent. Independent voters go to Biden 55 – 32 percent. Republicans back Trump 86 – 10 percent as Biden leads 96 – 2 percent among Democrats. “Former Vice President Joseph Biden calls himself a blue-collar guy. With Ohio certainly a blue-collar state, it is no surprise he is the Democrat who runs best against President Donald Trump and is solidly ahead in the Democratic primary in the Buckeye State,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Handout As an Adobe Acrobat
    AEI Election Watch 2006 October 11, 2006 Bush’s Ratings Congress’s Ratings Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 39 56 CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 28 63 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 37 59 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 24 68 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 39 60 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 32 66 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 34 60 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 27 64 Newsweek Oct. 5-6 33 59 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 31 57 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 36 57 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 27 69 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 38 59 Diag.-Hotline Sep. 24-26 28 65 PSRA/Pew Sep. 21-Oct. 4 37 53 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 30 57 NBC/WSJ Sep. 30-Oct. 2 39 56 Fox/OD Sep. 12-13 29 53 Fox/OD Sep. 26-27 42 54 NBC/WSJ (RV) Sep. 8-11 20 65 Diag-Hotline Sep. 24-26 42 56 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 45 52 Final October approval rating for the president and Final October approval rating for Congress and number of House seats won/lost by the president’s number of House seats won/lost by the president’s party party Gallup/CNN/USA Today Gallup/CNN/USA Today Number Number Approve of seats Approve of seats Oct. 2002 67 +8 Oct. 2002 50 +8 Oct. 1998 65 +5 Oct. 1998 44 +5 Oct. 1994 48 -52 Oct. 1994 23 -52 Oct. 1990 48 -9 Oct. 1990 24 -9 Oct. 1986 62 -5 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Statewide Poll: More Oppose Impeachment Than Favor It, but State Remains Toss- up for 2020 Election
    North Carolina Statewide Poll: More Oppose Impeachment Than Favor It, But State Remains Toss- Up for 2020 Election. Biden Still Leads Among Dems Peter L. Francia and Jonathan S. Morris ___________ Key Findings • 50% of registered voters in North Carolina oppose the impeachment and removal of President Trump from office compared to 44% who favor it. o More than 80% of self-identified Democrats favor impeachment compared to 9% of Republicans and 36% of independents and unaffiliated registered voters. • However, only 44% of registered voters in North Carolina think that President Trump should be re-elected compared to 51% who think it is time for someone else to be president. • North Carolina is near evenly split on President Trump’s job performance, with 45% who approve and 47% who disapprove. • Among Democrats, former Vice President Joe Biden leads at 29%, ahead of Bernie Sanders (19%), Elizabeth Warren (17%), Andrew Yang (9%), Kamala Harris (8%), Pete Buttigieg (4%), Beto O’Rourke (4%), Amy Klobuchar (3%), Cory Booker (1%), and Julian Castro (1%). • In head-to-head matchups against some of the top Democratic contenders, Trump currently sits in a virtual tie in North Carolina, roughly 13 months from Election Day. o Trump vs. Biden: Trump 46.4%, Biden 49.7% (Biden +3.3) o Trump vs. Sanders: Trump 47.7%, Sanders 48.5% (Sanders +0.8) o Trump vs. Warren: Trump 48.5%, Warren 47.6% (Trump +0.9) o Trump vs. Harris: Trump 49.3%, Harris 46.9% (Trump +2.4) o Trump vs. Buttigieg: Trump 49.4%, Buttigieg 46.8% (Trump +2.6) As House Democrats in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • All Top Dems Beat Trump As Voters' Economic Outlook
    Mary Snow, Polling Analyst (203) 506-8202 Doug Schwartz, Director (203) 582-5201 FOR RELEASE: AUGUST 28, 2019 ALL TOP DEMS BEAT TRUMP AS VOTERS’ ECONOMIC OUTLOOK DIMS QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; DEM PRIMARY STAYS STABLE WITH BIDEN HOLDING THE LEAD If the 2020 presidential election were held today, 54 percent of registered voters say that they would vote for former Vice President Joe Biden, while only 38 percent would vote for President Trump. Matchups against other top Democrats show: • Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders topping Trump 53 – 39 percent; • Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren ahead of Trump 52 – 40 percent; • California Sen. Kamala Harris beating Trump 51 – 40 percent; • South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg leading with 49 percent to Trump’s 40 percent. Looking at all of the matchups, President Trump is stuck between 38 and 40 percent of the vote. These low numbers may partly be explained by a lack of support among white women, a key voting bloc that voted for Trump in the 2016 election. Today, white women go for the Democratic candidate by double digits in every scenario. Though it is a long 14 months until Election Day, Trump’s vulnerability among this important voting group does not bode well for him. “In hypothetical matchups between President Trump and the top five Democratic presidential candidates, one key number is 40,” said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Mary Snow. “It’s the ceiling of support for Trump, no matter the candidate. It hovers close to his job approval rating, which has stayed in a tight range since being elected.” Voters say 56 – 38 percent that they disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president, compared to the 54 – 40 percent disapproval he received a month ago.
    [Show full text]