Leading the Way in Life Sciences Innovation
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Industry City and the Proposed Rezoning
SUNSET PARK’S JOBS, WORKING Working group convened by Council Member Carlos Menchaca WATERFRONT, AND INDUSTRY CITY July 31, 2019 AGENDA . Welcome, introductions, goals for today . Sunset Park’s Economy and Employment . Sunset Park’s Working Waterfront . Competing Visions . Industry City’s Vision . Green Jobs . Tools to strengthen industrial districts and workforce 2 REVIEW GOAL FOR THE WORKING GROUP . Advise CM Menchaca on whether or not a rezoning has potential to be a net benefit for Sunset Park . Identify minimum criteria necessary to entertain the rezoning proposal .If yes, identify non-negotiables elements of a plan and tools/strategies . If no, articulate why 3 WORKING GROUP CALENDAR UNDERSTANDING HOUSING AND WORKING BRINGING IT IC’S PROPOSAL DISPLACEMENT WATERFRONT TOGETHER JULY 11 JULY 31 JULY 24 AUGUST 15 Understanding the Discuss data, concerns Discuss data, concerns Further develop tools rezoning proposal and solutions around and solutions around and finalize housing affordability the working recommendations and displacement waterfront and local workforce 4 SUNSET PARK’S ECONOMY AND EMPLOYMENT 5 EDUCATION INDICATORS Education Sunset Park NYC Students performing at grade level in ELA, 4th grade (2018) 50.3% 49.3% Students performing at grade level in math, 4th grade (2018) 52.3% 46.4% White students performing at grade level in math, 4th grade (2017) - 67.4% Hispanic students performing at grade level in math, 4th grade (2017) - 33.6% Asian students performing at grade level in math, 4th grade (2017) - 74.4% Population 25+ with Bachelor’s Degree or higher (2017) 29.3% 37.3% Population 25+ without a HS Diploma (2017) 37.5% 18.1% • Sunset Park students are above average for 4th grade ELA and math performance. -
Engine Failure
S EPTEMBER 2003 www.nycfuture.org ENGINE Inside FAILURE Falling Behind p.8 Through boom times and bust, NYC’s jobless rate outpaces the nation’s. Is “FIRE” Burning Out? p.9 New York’s economic foundation starts to sag—with no reinforcements With Economic Woes in sight. That Go Well Beyond 9/11, Outbound Traffic p.15 Demographic analysis shows that out-migration from NYC has spiked New York Needs a Bold New Vision since 9/11. To Renew the City’s Economy Does Bloomberg Mean Business? p.18 An early look at the billionaire mayor’s economic development vision. Beyond the Boroughs p.22 Houston and L.A. defeated their FOR MUCH OF ITS HISTORY NEW YORK HAS MANAGED TO CONFOUND economic demons: can New York? both those who predicted its demise and those whose aspirations for the city possessed no limits. This is anoth- On the surface, New York er one of those times. As the city begins to emerge from the depths of its fiscal appears to be in good Fcrisis, New York remains among the world’s pre-eminent shape to weather the cities, with a storehouse of financial, human and cultural capital without equal anywhere on the planet. It possess- current economic crisis. es arguably unmatched concentrations of skilled labor and “Yet the bitter reality is that a growing population of energetic and entrepreneurially in the longer term, oriented immigrants. It remains the world’s undisputed financial center and enjoys one of the lowest crime rates New York continues to lose of any major American city. -
APEC Port Development Report 2019
2019 APEC Port Development Report 2019 1 2 2018 APEC Port Development Report www.apecpsn.org APEC Port Services Network (APSN) is an international organization established in response to the directives of the 14th APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in 2006 and with the support of all leaders from APEC member economies to promote exchanges and cooperation among port and port-related industries in the Asia-Pacific region. The mandate of the APSN is to facilitate trade and investment and enhance supply chain security by strengthening economic cooperation, capacity building, information and personnel exchanges among port and port-related industries and services in the region, so as to achieve the common prosperity of the APEC member economies as a whole. Ever since establishment of APSN, as a complimentary service for port-related industries in the Asia-Pacific region, APEC Port Development Report has published 10 issues. This report focuses on the development of Asia-Pacific ports in 2019, covering trade, ocean shipping, port infrastructure and operation, laws and regulations, intelligent and sustainable development. With its detailed statistics, and in-depth analyses, APEC Port Development Report has become an important reference for those engaging in port-related industries. The APSN secretariat sincerely welcomes your advice, and we hope that ports and organizations can contribute variously valuable information so that we can follow the development of the industry even closer, and provide our readers with more accurate information in a more -
Walkup Wake-Up Call: New York © the George Washington University School of Business 2017 3 Introduction
By Christopher B. Leinberger & Patrick Lynch The George Washington University School of Business Christopher B. Leinberger, Michael Rodriguez & Tracy Loh By CENTER FOR REAL ESTATE & URBAN ANALYSIS THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS 1 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 4 Executive Summary........................................... 5 II. LAND USE DEFINED ....................................... 8 A New Lens for Understanding the Tri-State Region ................. 9 Form Meets Function ......................................... 10 Methodology................................................ 12 The Eight Types of WalkUPs.................................... 15 III. LAND USE IN METRO NEW YORK .......................... 21 Maps: Where the WalkUPs Are in the Tri-State Region .............. 22 Geographic Findings .......................................... 25 Product Findings ............................................. 26 Findings in Real Estate Trends................................... 30 IV. WALKUP PERFORMANCE & RANKINGS .................... 31 Economic Performance ........................................ 32 Economic Rankings ........................................... 39 Social Equity Performance ..................................... 41 Social Equity Rankings ........................................ 50 V. FUTURE WALKUPS ........................................ 53 Emerging & Potential WalkUPs ................................. 54 VI. NEXT STEPS ............................................. -
New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES -
Suri Kasirer, the Lobbyist Behind Cornell's Roosevelt Island Win
BETABEAT POLITICKER GALLERISTNY COMMERCIAL VSL POLITICKERNJ SEARCH CO Chartweek Lease Beat Mortgage Beat Sales Beat Power Broker Suri Kasirer, the Lobbyist Behind Cornell’s Roosevelt Island Win By Daniel Edward Rosen 6/05/12 10:00am Twitter Facebook 3 LinkedIn 1 Email Print It was near the end of 2011, and what most New Yorkers knew of the city’s plan to create an ambitious tech campus on Roosevelt Island was that Stanford University had the project in the bag. For Suri Kasirer, the founder and president of Kasirer Consulting, the notion could not have been farther from the truth. Indeed, the New York native had been working behind the scenes for months on behalf of her darkhorse client, Cornell University, to whittle down the number of candidates vying to oversee the project, and it was all finally beginning to pay off. “We’re in a service business, so we do whatever we have to do to make sure that our clients can achieve their goals … within a framework of ethics and principle,” said Ms. Kasirer, whose offices are decorated with photographs of herself next to a litany of the country’s most powerful public figures, Bill and Hillary Clinton as well as Bette Midler not least among them. “Sometimes it means doing the dirty work.” Even before her involvement with Cornell University, the institution now charged with overseeing what many see as Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s crowning civic achievement, Ms. Kasirer learned about dirty work during her tenure as advisor to then-Governor Mario Cuomo and as an advocate for nonprofits. -
June 2019 Landmarks Resolutions
Carter Booth, Chair Antony Wong, Treasurer Daniel Miller, First Vice Chair Keen Berger, Secretary Susan Kent, Second Vice Chair Erik Coler, Assistant Secretary Bob Gormley, District Manager Community Board No. 2, Manhattan 3 Washington Square Village N EW YORK, NY 10012-1899 www.cb2manhattan.org P: 212-979-2272 F: 212-254-5102 E : [email protected] Greenwich Village v Little Italy v SoHo v NoHo v Hudson Square v Chinatown v Gansevoort Market June 21, 2019 Sarah Carroll, Chair NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission One Centre St., 9th Floor North New York, New York 10007 Dear Chair Carroll: At its Full Board meeting on June 20, 2019, Community Board #2, Manhattan (CB2, Man.) adopted the following resolution: 1. 43 Perry Street. - Application is to replace windows at the primary façade. Whereas: A. The facade was extensively altered prior to designation to a Dutch inspired style with a stained glass window on the ground floor and custom casement windows incorporating distinctive round stained glass elements on the upper floors; and B. The applicant presented evidence that the window with stained glass on the first floor can be restored while the existing casement windows on the upper floors are deteriorated to the extent that they are beyond repair; and C. The existing windows date from the 1948 pre-designation design, with custom made mullions fitted with round architectural stained glass in each section, and they are clearly integral to the design of building and in this respect are historic to the existing facade; and D. The proposal is to replace all of the windows with sliding style windows with considerably wider frames and “snap-in” mullions and is in no respect suitable for this building and the historic neighborhood; now Therefore be it resolved that CB2, Man. -
July 2019 SLA Licensing Resolutions
Carter Booth, Chair Antony Wong, Treasurer Daniel Miller, First Vice Chair Keen Berger, Secretary Susan Kent, Second Vice Chair Erik Coler, Assistant Secretary Bob Gormley, District Manager COMMUNITY BOARD NO. 2, MANHATTAN 3 W ASHINGTON SQUARE V ILLAGE N EW YORK, NY 10012-1899 www.cb2manhattan.org P: 212-979-2272 F: 212-254-5102 E : [email protected] Greenwich Village v Little Italy v SoHo v NoHo v Hudson Square v Chinatown v Gansevoort Market July 23, 2019 Director Licensing Issuance Division NY State Liquor Authority 317 Lenox Avenue New York, New York 10027 Dear Sir/Madam: At its Full Board meeting on July 18, 2019, Community Board #2, Manhattan (CB2, Man.) adopted the following resolution: 1. K&K Grand Corp., d/b/a SoHo Thai, 141 Grand St. 10013 (OP – Restaurant | Corporate Transfer) i. Whereas, applicant appeared before Community Board 2, Manhattan’s SLA Licensing committee to present an application for a corporate change to the existing restaurant wine license (SN 1278344) for their Thai cuisine restaurant located in a M1-5B zoned for-story, mixed-use 1920 building on Grand Street between Lafayette and Crosby Streets (block #233/ lot #12) in the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission designated SoHo-Cast Iron Historic District; and, ii. Whereas, the interior 1-story premises are 1,350 sq. ft., and has a total of 15 tables with 46 seats and one service bar (no seats); and applicant has Letter of No Objection to use the space as a food and drinking establishment from the NYC Department of Buildings; and, iii. Whereas, the applicant signed and notarized a new stipulations agreement with CB2, Man. -
Industrial Rezoning in U.S. Cities | Manhattan Institute
January 2021 ISSUE BRIEF INDUSTRIAL REZONING IN U.S. CITIES Connor Harris Fellow Industrial Rezoning in U.S. Cities 2 Contents LIFT THE CAP WHY NEW Introduction YORK ..................................................................CITY NEEDS MORE CHARTER SCHOOLS3 San Francisco, CA ........................................................4 New York, NY ...............................................................5 Boston, MA ..................................................................6 Portland, OR .................................................................7 Chicago, IL ...................................................................8 Conclusion ...................................................................9 Endnotes .................................................................... 11 Issue Brief Industrial Rezoning in U.S. Cities 3 LIFT THE CAP WHY NEW YORK CITY NEEDS MORE CHARTER SCHOOLS Introduction In many of America’s most expensive cities, desirable commercial and residential buildings abut areas filled with stagnant, unproductive, and often decrepit industries. This is not an accident: it is the product of land-use and zoning codes, which often prohibit nonindustrial uses of large, centrally located areas that would otherwise be in high demand for residential and commercial redevelopment. These policies are supposedly a bulwark against gentrification and the depredations of housing developers, as well as a means of preserving high-paying industrial jobs. But these benefits are often illusory, and they -
West Village Little Italy Noho Civic Center Chinatown Hudson Square
Neighborhood Map ¯ Bleecker Street 494 88 1 Bond Street E 2 Street 15 6 Avenue Anthology 95 Minetta Center for 1 Mercer 2 Avenue Green t Fiorello Film e 56 Architecture e Playground M15 t La Guardia r Washington 29 324 Archives Grove Street Father15 Demo t e SBS Statue 26 60 S e Square Extra Place Square a r Morton Street tt t Village Hudson Street Our Lady e 101 313 n S i 1 6 M15 n M 337 31 B 68 of Pompeii Bleecker Street 350 e a Church of d 652 f t Church v 464 o 5 i e Minetta l Barrow Street r l d Street Mercer Saint Luke re 30 S u t Triangle Broadway 28 M20 tr 27 228 Bleecker Street in the Fields e S S Culture 37 71 e Street Thompson t y Street MacDougal 2 336 4 ro Bleecker St Project 100 197 La Guardia Place Guardia La 198 Commerce Street e 231 189 177 163 147 123 113 212 77 73 29 L 53 E 1 Street Cherry 7 Avenue South Greenwich Street653 88 324 26 Lane Bleecker Street Bleecker Street Bleecker Street 14 30 41 Winston Bleecker Street Theatre Carmine Street 316 32 Churchill Avenue of the AmericasLittle Red Bowery 178 162 146 98 68 60 195 196 210 Square 171 Square 642 M20 Downing Street 36 M103 2 Av Playground La Guardia M103 452 Corner 100 Liz Christy Barrow Street 49 Gardens 39 Garden 455 Noho 102 43 278 257 Greenwich 28 M55 M55 296 69 51 Bedford Street M21 West 509 Silver Towers 294 33 Downing Street Chrystie Street 71 637 35 22 William F. -
The Case of New York City's Financial District
INFORMATION TECHNOWGY AND WORLD CITY RESTRUCTURING: THE CASE OF NEW YORK CITY'S FINANCIAL DISTRICT by Travis R. Longcore A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honors Bachelor of Arts in Geography May 1993 Copyright 1993 Travis R. Longcore All Rights Reserved INFORMATION TECHNOWGY AND WORLD CITY RESTRUCTURING: THE CASE OF NEW YORK CITY'S FINANCIAL DISTRICT by Travis R. Longcore Approved: Peter W. Rees, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: Robert Warren, Ph.D. Committee Member from the College of Urban Affairs Approved: Francis X. Tannian, Ph.D. Committee Member from the University Honors Program Approved: Robert F. Brown, Ph.D. Director, University Honors Program "Staccato signals of constant information, A loose affiliation of millionaires and billionaires and baby, These are the days of miracle and wonder. This is a long distance call. " Paul Simon, Graceland iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to recognize and thank Dr. Peter Rees for his guidance on this project. Without the patient hours of discussion, insightful editorial comments, and firm schedule, this thesis would have never reached completion. The author also thanks the University Honors Program, the Undergraduate Research Program and the Department of Geography at the University of Delaware for their financial support. Many thanks are due to the Water Resources Agency for New Castle County for the use of their automated mapping system. IV TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OFTABLES .................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ix ABSTRACT ....................................... .. x Chapter 1 THE CITY IN A WORLD ECONOMY ................... -
CB11 Recommendation
COMMUNITY BOARD ELEVEN BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN 1664 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10035 Diane Collier TEL: (212) 831-8929/30 Chair FAX: (212) 369-3571 Angel D. Mescain District Manager www.cb11m.org April 18, 2017 Marisa Lago Director New York City Department of City Planning 120 Broadway, 31st Floor New York, NY 10271 Re: Land Use Application No. 170269PCM, 170270PCM – M11 Sanitation Garage Relocation On April 18, 2017, Community Board 11 (CB11) held a public hearing and voted on Land Use Application Nos. 170269PCM, 170270PCM, submitted by the New York City Department of Sanitation, the New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services and the New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development with respect to a proposed project which would result in the relocation of the Manhattan District 11 Sanitation Garage, Manhattan Lot Cleaning Unit and Headquarters to a site located at 207-17 East 127th Street (Block 1792, Lot 5 and p/o Lot 28) between Second Avenue and Third Avenue and East 127th Street and 128th Street in the Borough of Manhattan. The Manhattan District 11 Sanitation Garage and Manhattan Lot Cleaning Unit and Headquarters are currently located elsewhere in Manhattan Community District 11 (East Harlem). Our board has considered this project over the past few months and has hosted several presentations by the development team. Project Description The City of New York (“City”) Department of Sanitation (“DSNY”) with the Department of Citywide Administrative Services (“DCAS”) proposes to acquire (acquisition terms to be determined), approximately 119,560 square feet (SF) of space comprising (a) an entire building of approximately 91,478 SF, (b) approximately 3,800 SF of outdoor parking space, and (c) approximately 24,282 SF adjacent land on which a new building, comprising of approximately 8,750 SF of space will be constructed by the property owner, at 207-17 East 127th Street (aka 2495 Second Avenue and/or 206-20 East 128th Street), in the Borough of Manhattan, all to be used by DSNY.