DOCSLIB.ORG

Kerbside Collection Calendar 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kerbside Collection Calendar 2021 Kerbside collection calendar 2021 JANUARY 2021 FEBRUARY 2021 MARCH 2021 APRIL 2021 M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 Green Organics Bin Week (collected fortnightly) MAY 2021 JUNE 2021 JULY 2021 AUGUST 2021 Yellow Recycling Bin Week (collected fortnightly) M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 Blue Waste to Landfill Bin (collected weekly) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 MON Magill & Tranmere 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 TUES Hectorville & Rostrevor WED Campbelltown 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 THU Paradise & Newton 31 30 31 FRI Athelstone SEPTEMBER 2021 OCTOBER 2021 NOVEMBER 2021 DECEMBER 2021 Public holiday – No collections M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S on New Year’s Day or Good Friday. All collections will 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 move to the next day for the 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 remaining week. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Public Holiday – Normal collection 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 DON’T KNOW WHICH BIN? COLLECTION ENQUIRIES, OTHER WASTE ENQUIRIES MY LOCAL SERVICES APP HEAD TO THE MISSED BINS & BIN REPAIRS Council 8366 9222 Download the free WHICH BIN WEBSITE East Waste 8347 5111 campbelltown.sa.gov.au app from the App eastwaste.com.au Store or Google Play for KERBSIDE COLLECTION your collection calendar, Bins should be kerbside bin reminder alerts and by 6am on collection day. waste and recycling tips. WHICH BIN? THE YELLOW RECYCLING BIN Council Waste and For information about where, how and what you can recycle head to Recycling Services whichbin.sa.gov.au HARD WASTE COLLECTION Book one free ‘at call’ collection per financial year. Book online eastwaste.com.au/our- services/hard-rubbish Paper and Rigid plastic Juice and Tins Glass bottles Aluminum foil Call East Waste 8347 5111 cardboard containers milk cartons and cans and jars and trays Email [email protected] SCRAP METAL BOOKINGS Call Denron Metals 8352 8772 Aerosols NO general NO clothing, NO building NO plastic NO broken FOOD SCRAPS GO IN THE GREEN BIN (empty) waste footwear or materials, dirt bags or crockery or textiles or rocks wrapping glassware Please use your green bin for all food scraps including dairy products, egg and oyster shells, bones, meat and seafood, fruit and vegetables, tea bags WHICH BIN? THE GREEN ORGANICS BIN and coffee grounds as well as paper For information about where, how and what you can compost head to towels and tissues. Council provides whichbin.sa.gov.au each household with a kitchen organics basket and annual supply of compostable bags to make it easy. FREE TV COMPUTER AND HOUSEHOLD CHEMICAL WASTE DROP-OFF Fruit and Bread, pasta Meat, bones Paper towel Compostable Lawn clippings Campbelltown Council Depot vegetables and rice and seafood and tissues bags and cutlery and weeds 6 Newton Road, Campbelltown Monday to Friday 8am–3pm campbelltown.sa.gov.au/hazardouswaste HEAD TO WHICHBIN.SA.GOV.AU Prunings, NO plastic NO clothing, NO building NO general NO plastic For information about where, how and twigs and packaged footwear or materials, dirt waste pots, containers leaves food textiles or rocks or bottles what you can recycle..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waste Audit Report
    REPORT Single Family Curbside Waste and Participation Audit City of Toronto August 2016 159 Ridout Street South, London, Ont. N6C 3X7 Paul van der Werf Tel: 519-645-7733 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Results- Fall 2015 .............................................................................................................. 2 3.1 Set Out and Participation .................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Quantity of Waste Streams Collected................................................................................. 3 3.3 Waste Composition ............................................................................................................. 4 3.3.1 Overall ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.3.2 Residual Material ......................................................................................................... 5 3.3.3 Recycling .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5.0 Kerbside Contents
    WEEE Collection Good Practice Guidance 1 5.0 Kerbside Contents 5.1 Bulky waste 01 5.1.1 Interacting with local reuse schemes 01 5.1.2 Identifying reusable items 02 5.1.3 Collection arrangements 02 5.2 Staff training 04 5.3 Handling and storage 05 5.4 Contractual arrangements 06 5.5 Small Mixed WEEE collections 07 WEEE Collection Good Practice Guidance 1 Audience: The primary audience for this section of the guidance is waste collection authorities (and their contractors). However, third sector organisations and producer compliance schemes will also be interested in this guidance. Benefits: The benefit to the collection authorities of implementing this good practice is to maximise the WEEE that is segregated for reuse and recycling through their kerbside/bulky waste collections. Producer compliance schemes will find this section of interest as they can benefit from innovative collection methods and may wish to discuss appropriate approved recycling and reuse routes with the local authorities. Third sector organisations will find the guidance of value by understanding how they can support waste collection authorities to maximise diversion of WEEE for reuse. Summary: This chapter considers the options available to waste collection authorities for maximising reuse and recycling of WEEE, through kerbside/ bulky waste collections, bring banks and ad hoc collections such as WEEE amnesties. Advice is therefore provided on how to identify reusable items, how to raise awareness of reuse avenues with householders and how to interact with local reuse schemes so they provide the level of service required. Useful sources of information of relevance to this section of the guidance are available from the Furniture Reuse Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardising Kerbside Collections in Aotearoa
    Recommendations for standardisation of kerbside collections in Aotearoa Prepared for Ministry for the Environment May 2020 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STANDARDISATION OF KERBSIDE COLLECTIONS IN AOTEAROA DOCUMENT QUALITY CONTROL Version Date Written by Distributed to Sarah Pritchett (WasteMINZ) and Draft 0.1 29 May 2020 Sunshine Yates (Sunshine Stephen Goodman Yates Consulting) on behalf of WasteMINZ Sarah Pritchett and Draft 0.2 10 June 2020 Stephen Goodman Sunshine Yates Sarah Pritchett and Final 1.0 26 June 2020 Stephen Goodman Sunshine Yates CONTACT DETAILS Ministry for the Environment WasteMINZ Stephen Goodman Sarah Pritchett Policy Manager Sustainability Advisor 23 Kate Sheppard Place PO Box 305426 Thorndon Triton Plaza Wellington 6143 Auckland 0757 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Project Managers acknowledges the time, expertise and guidance provided by the members of the Steering Group and Oversight Group in preparing this report. Steering Group Oversight Group Duncan Wilson (Chair) - Eunomia Research and Consulting Stephen Goodman (Chair) - MfE Mike Jones - Earthcare Environmental Shaun Lewis - MfE Rick Thorpe - Xtreme Zero Waste/Zero Waste Network Parul Sood - Auckland Council Rob Wilson - Eco Central Jason Krupp - Local Government New Zealand Angela Atkins - Hastings District Council Pamela Ritchie - MfE Janine Brinsdon - WasteMINZ Rodrick Boys - MfE Stephen Goodman - MfE The Project Managers also thank each and every local authority representative and waste and resource recovery industry representative that generously gave of their time and expertise
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Guidance for Residents
    Kent County Council Waste Management Guide to household waste disposal Guidance document for residents September 2019 4 kent.gov.uk This document can be made available in other formats or languages. To request this, please email [email protected] or telephone 03000 421553 (text relay service 18001 03000 421553). This number goes to an answer machine, which is monitored during office hours. Or write to: Kent County Council, Diversity & Equality Team Room G37, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1XQ 2 Contents Responsibility for Waste Background Information 4 Roles of Authorities in Kent & Current Performance 5 Waste Segregation 6-17 Household Waste Recycling Centres 18-20 Conclusion 21 Waste Collection Authority Contacts 22 Quicklinks 23 Kent County Council Waste Management Mission Our Ambition is to deliver a high quality household waste disposal service, whilst remaining cost- effective for the people of Kent, with an emphasis on waste reduction, reuse, recycling and achieving zero landfill 3 Collection and disposal of waste Background Information Kent County Council (KCC) works in partnership with the Kent District and Borough Councils to find the best solution for the household waste that requires disposal. The aim of this document is to provide clear guidance to residents so they can dispose of their waste in a way that is in line with the Waste Hierarchy enabling waste to be reduced, reused or recycled where possible; and waste being sent for incineration or landfill is as minimal as possible. Prevention Most preferred Preparing for re-use Recycling Other recovery Disposal Least preferred 4 Roles of authorities in Kent District and Borough Councils are Waste Collection Authorities (WCAs) and they are responsible for collecting household waste from residents’ houses, referred to as kerbside collections.
    [Show full text]
  • National Waste Report 2018 19 NOVEMBER 2018
    National Waste Report 2018 19 NOVEMBER 2018 PREPARED FOR Department of the Environment and Energy PREPARED IN ASSOCIATION WITH Report title National Waste Report 2018 Client Department of the Environment and Energy Status Final Authors Joe Pickin, Paul Randell, Jenny Trinh, Bill Grant Data analysts Luke Richmond, Joe Pickin Reviewers Christine Wardle, Luke Richmond Project number P863 Report date 19 November 2018 Contract date 20 September 2017 Information current to 1 July 2018 Copyright Department of the Environment and Energy; Blue Environment Pty Ltd Disclaimer This report has been prepared for Department of the Environment and Energy in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment dated 20 September 2017, and is based on the assumptions and exclusions set out in our scope of work. Information in this document is current as of 1 July 2018. While all professional care has been undertaken in preparing this report, Blue Environment Pty Ltd cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. The mention of any company, product or process in this report does not constitute or imply endorsement by Blue Environment Pty Ltd. © Department of the Environment and Energy; Blue Environment Pty Ltd Blue Environment prints on 100% recycled paper Blue Environment Pty Ltd ABN 78 118 663 997 Suite 209, 838 Collins St, Docklands Vic 3008 Email: [email protected] Web: www.blueenvironment.com.au Phone: +61 3 9081 0440 / +61 3 5426 3536 Contents At a glance ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of Metro Vancouver's Green Bin Program
    The Effectiveness of Metro Vancouver’s Green Bin Program Alexander M. Lui1, Helen Heacock2 Abstract Background and Aims Metro Vancouver is implementing a disposal ban on all food scraps from entering the landfills and incinerators by the year 2015. In order to prepare the city’s residents, a food scraps recycling program, known as the Green Bin Program, was initiated in 2013 for all single family households. The aim of this research project was to measure public knowledge and awareness of the program across various demographics and collect data on the general opinion of it. Methods An online survey was created using SurveyMonkey, a survey generating website, and distributed online via Facebook and e-mail. The results from these surveys were analyzed using NCSS software to determine statistical significance via a chi-squared analysis with alpha (a) = 0.05. Results There were a total of 70 respondents. Of these, 68% of the respondents indicated that the Green Bin Program should stay the way it currently is without any further changes. 8% of the respondents were in favour of stopping the program and the remaining 24% indicated that the program needed some modifications such as more education/promotional material, implementing the program into apartment complexes and more garbage pickup days to prevent pest and odor problems. Age category, location of residence, and educational background were analyzed against other variables in the survey that tested the knowledge and usefulness of the Green Bin Program. Looking at these 3 variables in relation to knowledge: there was no association between location of residence, age, and educational background, with knowledge of what could go into the green bin (p= 0.76, p= 0.53, p= 0.33, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Changing the Paradigm of the Municipal Solid Waste Management in Naucalpan, Mexico
    CHANGING THE PARADIGM OF THE MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN NAUCALPAN, MEXICO In Mexico, 102,895 tonnes of waste are generated daily, of which 83.93% are collected and 78.54% are disposed of final disposal sites. Only 9.63% of the waste is recycled. FELICITY in a nutshell The waste sector contributes to 4.6% of GHG emissions. “Financing Energy for Low-carbon Investment- 28% of these emissions would need to be reduced in Cities Advisory Facility” is an initiative of GIZ and order to reach Mexico´s NDCs. the European Investment Bank (EIB) to support low-carbon infrastructure projects in cities that significantly contribute to sustainable development and To achieve the reduction of GHG emissions, a proper climate change mitigation. management of solid waste is essential. This includes the As a project preparation facility, FELICITY offers technical closure of landfills, support for sanitary landfills, the assistance to cities in designing and construction of biodigesters construction, operating structuring their infrastructure investment projects. organizations as well as the development of integrated waste management plans. FELICITY prioritizes the interest of cities and incor- porates the perspective of international financiers. Waste management in Naucalpan Naucalpan de Juarez is a municipality in the State of Mexico with a population of 872,320 inhabitants. Currently, in Naucalpan waste is collected and then ©GIZ, Daniel de la Torre disposed of in a landfill, not taking advantage of potential energetic use of the waste. With the proposed project Naucalpan wants to significantly improve the waste management system. Municipal solid waste (MSW) separation and treatment in a mechanical and biological treatment (MBT) facility is envisaged to attain landfill deviation of MSW streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Festival-Waste-Forms.Pdf
    City of Toronto Solid Waste Special Events INFORMATION SHEET FOR FOOD VENDORS AND RESTAURANTS Why divert waste? • Diverting recyclable and organic materials helps extend the lifespan of the City’s landfill. • Reduce the negative impacts of waste on the environment. • Lower costs for garbage disposal by diverting more. • Attract more event attendees by striving to be a “green” or “eco” event • Do your part to help the City of Toronto divert more waste. Services provided by Solid Waste during the event • Provision of commercial-sized organic toters and recycling toters to accommodate additional waste generated by the event. • Nightly recycling and organics collection services, provided that the toters are rolled to curb side for collection. • Additional organics or recycling generated by the event can be placed in restaurant toters and it will be collected on each night of the event if it is placed at curb side. Checklist of things to be aware of/look for during and after the event Make sure there is a complete waste station (offering disposal for garbage, recycling, organics) by your tent or area. Know the location of the nearest waste station. Point it out to your customers and ask them to place their waste in the appropriate bin. If serving on foam polystyrene plates or containers, remind customers that these takeout containers are recyclable (not cutlery). Scrape or wipe off any excess food from foam polystyrene plates or aluminium food trays before putting these in the recycling toter. Do not place recycling or organics in black bags. Place these materials in clear bags only.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of a Green Nudge on Municipal Solid Waste: Evidence from a Clear Bag Policy
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13925 The Effects of a Green Nudge on Municipal Solid Waste: Evidence from a Clear Bag Policy Mevlude Akbulut Yuksel Catherine Boulatoff DECEMBER 2020 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13925 The Effects of a Green Nudge on Municipal Solid Waste: Evidence from a Clear Bag Policy Mevlude Akbulut Yuksel Dalhousie University and IZA Catherine Boulatoff Dalhousie University DECEMBER 2020 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ISSN: 2365-9793 IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 13925 DECEMBER 2020 ABSTRACT The Effects of a Green Nudge on Municipal Solid Waste: Evidence from a Clear Bag Policy* We explore the power of behavioral economic insights to influence the level of households’ recycling and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) by examining the effectiveness of a green nudge, the adoption of a Clear Bag Policy that was implemented in 2015 in a mid-size urban municipality in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Recycling and Refuse Service Standards
    Your Recycling and Refuse Service Standards for Lewisham 1 What are Service Standards? Service Standards set out the standards that residents can expect from the Council regarding both recycling and refuse collection services. These services have a major impact, making Lewisham a great place to live, but we need your support and commitment. This is why the standards also outline what we need from you. Please visit www.lewisham.gov.uk/recycling for more information and keep this leaflet to refer to, thank you. Recycling We will provide a weekly collection of your paper, cardboard, glass, cans, plastic bottles, mixed plastics, beverage cartons (Tetra Pak) and shredded paper from your recycling wheelie bins, green boxes, clear sacks and large communal bins. Our promise Your role One of the following will be provided for Please contact us to let us know what kerbside properties and flats for recycling: recycling facilities you require. Recycling wheelie bins (kerbside). When recycling please ensure that you: Clear sacks (flats). Place the correct materials in the Communal recycling bins (estates/flats). recycling bin, loose if possible. Green reusable recycling estates bags Do not use black refuse sacks (these (estates). will not be collected). Your recycling crew will only empty recycling Wheelie bins and sacks must be bins and clear transparent sacks that contain moved to the inside edge of your the correct materials. property and be clear of obstructions. Leave recycling bins and clear sacks out by 6am on the correct collection day. 2 Our promise Your role We will return your recycling bin to the Please put the returned bin back to its outside edge of your property.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management
    10 Waste Management Coordinating Lead Authors: Jean Bogner (USA) Lead Authors: Mohammed Abdelrafie Ahmed (Sudan), Cristobal Diaz (Cuba), Andre Faaij (The Netherlands), Qingxian Gao (China), Seiji Hashimoto (Japan), Katarina Mareckova (Slovakia), Riitta Pipatti (Finland), Tianzhu Zhang (China) Contributing Authors: Luis Diaz (USA), Peter Kjeldsen (Denmark), Suvi Monni (Finland) Review Editors: Robert Gregory (UK), R.T.M. Sutamihardja (Indonesia) This chapter should be cited as: Bogner, J., M. Abdelrafie Ahmed, C. Diaz, A. Faaij, Q. Gao, S. Hashimoto, K. Mareckova, R. Pipatti, T. Zhang, Waste Management, In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Waste Management Chapter 10 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................. 587 10.5 Policies and measures: waste management and climate ....................................................... 607 10.1 Introduction .................................................... 588 10.5.1 Reducing landfill CH4 emissions .......................607 10.2 Status of the waste management sector ..... 591 10.5.2 Incineration and other thermal processes for waste-to-energy ...............................................608 10.2.1 Waste generation ............................................591 10.5.3 Waste minimization, re-use and
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Assessment
    Title: Reforming the UK packaging producer responsibility Impact Assessment (IA) system Date: 18/01/2021 Stage: Consultation IA No: Source of intervention: Domestic RPC Reference No: Secondary legislation Lead department or agency: Defra Type of measure: Other departments or agencies: Contact for enquiries: [email protected] Summary: Intervention and Options RPC OPINION: GREEN Cost of Preferred (or more likely) Option 3(2019 prices, 2020 present value) Total Net Business Net Net cost to business One-In, Business Impact Target Status Present Present Value per year () Three-Out Value £275.4m -£9,532.5m £1,131.0m In scope Qualifying provision What is the problem under consideration? Why is government intervention necessary? A producer responsibility (PR) system for packaging has been in place since 1997. Over this time, it has helped businesses across the UK to meet their packaging waste recycling obligations and the UK to achieve its and the EU packaging waste recycling targets whilst keeping the cost of compliance to businesses low compared to EU Member States. As the current system is designed to enable producers to meet (not exceed) their recycling targets it provides little incentive for producers to design their packaging to be more recyclable or encourage the use of reusable or refillable packaging. In addition, a range of environmental externalities (e.g. greenhouse gas emissions and disamenity impacts from littering) are not fully accounted for in packaging producers’ and users’ decisions. Other issues of the current system include stakeholders’ concerns over system transparency; limited direct financial support for local authorities (LAs) managing packaging waste and that recycling that can be done at a lower cost overseas resulting in a lack of a level playing field for domestic reprocessors.
    [Show full text]