DOCSLIB.ORG

Municipal Curbside Compostables Collection: What Works and Why?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Municipal Curbside Compostables Collection: What Works and Why? Municipal Curbside Compostables WHAT WORKS AND WHY? Collection MUNICIPAL CURBSIDE COMPOSTABLES COLLECTION What Works and Why? The Urban Sustainability Assessment (USA) Project: Identifying Effective Urban Sustainability Initiatives Department of Urban Studies and Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology Pl: Judith A. Layzer ([email protected]) Citation: Judith A. Layzer and Alexis Schulman. 2014. Primary Researcher: “Municipal Curbside Compostables Collection: What Works and Why?” Alexis Schulman Work product of the Urban Sustainability Assessment (USA) Project, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Team: Yael Borofsky COPYRIGHT © 2014. All rights reserved. Caroline Howe Aditya Nochur Keith Tanner Louise Yeung Design: Gigi McGee Design CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i INTRODUCTION 1 THE CASES 4 THE CONTEXT FOR CURBSIDE COMPOSTABLES COLLECTION 10 DESIGNING AN EFFECTIVE CURBSIDE COMPOSTABLES COLLECTION PROGRAM 22 GETTING STARTED 36 CONCLUSIONS 42 REFERENCES 45 APPENDIX A: THE BENEFITS OF COMPOSTING 49 APPENDIX B: CASE STUDIES 52 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to the Summit Foundation, Renee Dello, Senior Analyst, Solid Waste Sue Patrolia, Recycling Coordinator, Townships Washington, D.C. for generously funding this Management Services, City of Toronto. of Hamilton and Wenham. project. In addition, for their willingness to speak openly and repeatedly about composting Kevin Drew, Residential Zero Waste Charlotte Pitt, Recycling Program Manager, in their cities, towns, and counties, we would Coordinator, San Francisco Department of Solid Waste Management, Denver Department like to thank the following people: the Environment. of Public Works. Bob Barrows, Waste Policy Coordinator, Dean Elstad, Recycling Coordinator, Department Andy Schneider, Recycling Program Manager, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. of Public Works, City of Minnetonka. Solid Waste Management Division, City of Berkeley. Denise Bartlett, Manager, Organic Soil Ron Gonen, Deputy Sanitation Commissioner Solutions, Cedar Grove Composting Inc. for Recycling and Sustainability, New York City. Ray Scott, Administrator, Mountainside Disposal Inc. Sue Bast, Environmental Specialist, City of John Jaimez, Organics Recycling Program Man- Burnsville. ager, Hennepin County Environmental Services. Arianne Sperry, Solid Waste and Recycling Planner, City of Portland Bureau of Planning Julie Bryant, Zero Waste Coordinator, Dick Lilly, Business Area Manager for Waste and Sustainability. San Francisco Department of the Environment. Prevention & Product Stewardship, Seattle Public Utilities. Brett Stav, Senior Planning and Development Jeff Callahan, Zero Waste Program and Specialist, Seattle Public Utilities. Recycling Manager, County of Boulder Randi Mail, Recycling Manager, City of Resource Conservation Division. Cambridge Department of Public Works. Bruce Walker, Solid Waste & Recycling Manager, Portland Bureau of Planning and Gretel Clark, Hamilton Township resident Josh Marx, Program Manager, Recycling and Sustainability. and chairperson of the Hamilton Recycling Environmental Services, King County Solid Committee. Waste Division. Richard Conlin, President, Seattle City Council. Brian Mathews, Senior Program Manager, StopWaste, Alameda County. Carolyn Dann, Municipal Assistance and Regional Recycling Coordinator, Massachusetts Kara Mertz, Local Environmental Action Division Department of Environmental Protection. Manager, City of Boulder. i CC BY-SA 2.0 Image courtesy of John Markos O’Neill on Flickr INTRODUCTION This assessment analyzes local efforts to undertake curbside collection of compostables in the United States, with the goal of enabling more communities to undertake such programs.1 Composting has become a tool for municipalities to pursue a variety of environmental goals, from “zero waste” to greenhouse gas emissions reduction. In addition, composting can save cities money on tipping fees by diverting waste from landfills. And composting can enhance public health by return- ing vital nutrients to the soil, reducing groundwater contamination, and keeping pests out of landfills. (See Appendix A for a more extensive discussion of the benefits of composting.) As of 2013, only 183 U.S. communities in 18 states were collecting compostables at the curb, but many cities—including Washington, D.C. and Austin, Texas—were signaling interest in adding this service.[2,3,64] To help municipalities develop curbside compostables collection programs, this assessment describes the critical elements that enable the establishment of such programs, identifies aspects of program design that enhance implementation, characterizes the obstacles new programs face, and explains how different cities have overcome those barriers. Our analysis focuses on the most com- prehensive approach to composting, curbside collection, but also includes smaller-scale alternatives (or complements), such as the provision of drop-off sites and encouragement of backyard and community-based composting. Although we consider commercial and institutional composting, we emphasize residential programs and the residential components of more comprehensive programs. We base our conclusions on in-depth interviews with municipal officials, waste haulers, and nonprofits, as well as reviews of web-based information, prior studies, and published data. To assess program effectiveness, we rely on measures such as the amount of compostables collected by weight, in total and per capita; the rate of participation in the program; and the program’s contribution to a city’s overall waste diversion. Where data are available, we also consider customer approval ratings and feedback from program staff. 1. The term “composting” refers to the process—either anaerobic or aerobic—of breaking down organic waste into a usable by- product. We use the term “compost” to denote this byproduct and the inputs to the process— including yard waste, food scraps, and soiled paper—as “compostables” or “organics.” Occasionally, we refer to Source Separated Or- ganics (SSO), which are compostables that are separated by households, commercial entities, or institutions prior to arriving at a processing facility. (The alternative to source separation is mixed municipal solid waste composting, which involves separation of materials at the facility.) 1 In a nutshell, our analysis yields several important insights about formulating, designing, and implementing an effective curbside compostables collection program—that is, one that achieves high participation and diversion rates with low levels of contamination. n Effective curbside compostables collection programs tend to arise most readily in places where conditions are favorable in two respects. First, an ambitious waste diversion mandate at the state or county level and/or high or rising landfill costs create incentives for a municipality to divert its waste from landfills. And second, two factors enhance a municipality’s ability to respond to those incentives: (1) a nearby processing facility that can handle the city’s food waste and (2) preex- isting infrastructure for collecting and processing yard waste.Without a strong incentive to divert organic waste and the capacity to do so, it is more difficult to establish a program; that said, even communities with relatively inhospitable initial conditions are finding creative ways to institute curbside compostables collection. n In designing an effective curbside compostables collection program, municipalities must do two things. First, they must gain the cooperation of haulers, something that is easier for communities that directly provide collection service or contract with a single hauler. Gaining hauler cooperation involves recognizing that for haulers the efficiency of collection routes (maximizing the tonnage collected while minimizing distance traveled) is a paramount consideration. And second, municipalities must motivate waste generators to both participate at high rates and separate organic materials properly in order to minimize contamination. To these ends, municipalities can provide incentives that make it relatively cheap and convenient to separate organics, disseminate adequate and well-designed information that makes composting readily comprehensible, and—most effective of all—mandate participation. n Finally, in launching curbside compostables collection, municipalities with effective programs almost invariably begin with a pilot program that reveals which approaches are likely to work best in that particular place and demonstrates the program’s viability to local skeptics. Whenever possible, program officials have pursued state or county grants to launch their pilot program(s). And several effective programs have worked with local nonprofits to get composting off the ground and then to enhance participation and set-out rates through education and incentive campaigns. 2 Seattle, WA Hamilton and Wenham, MA King County, WA Hennepin County, MN Cambridge,MA Burnsville, MN Portland, OR Toronto, Ontario New York City Berkeley, CA San Francisco, CA Alameda County, CA Arvin, CA Denver, CO Boulder, CO 3 THE CASES We selected for in-depth study fourteen U.S. jurisdictions and one Canadian city with a range of experiences and chal- lenges in collecting food waste. In addition to nine large and medium-sized cities and three smaller cities/towns, we in- cluded three counties, in recognition that initiating composting programs at a county scale can provide financial, political, and logistical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsletter Sample4
    Notes & News Notes & News www.vivanext.com April 2012 Edition News New Viva Bus Depot in Markham The City of Vaughan’s downtown core will undergo a transformation over the next several years. Encompass- ing 125-acres, development plans include oce and residential towers, shopping and entertainment complexes, plenty of green spaces and pedestrian walkways, and, of course, vivaNext rapid transit connec- tions. In recognition of all the exciting changes to come, Vaughan City Council determined that a change of name – from Vaughan Corporate Centre – was in order to better reect the true vision and future of this key hub. This summer, the City held a contest where people were encouraged to submit their suggestions. Almost 1,600 entries were received, including Central Vaughan, Vaughan Gateway, Vaughan Mosaic Centre and Vaughan Nexus. In the end, Vaughan Metropolitan Centre was chosen as the winning entry by the City subcommittee. Davis Drive Rapidway Construction - Ready, Set, GO! Last year we accomplished a lot on Davis Drive, and as of this spring we’ll be moving full speed ahead on construc- tion to build the rapidway. Starting soon, you’ll see a lot of utility companies along the corridor working to relocate gas, power, telecommunications, etc. Later this summer, we’ll be working on the Keith Bridge near the Tannery and doing some work near Southlake hospital. Watch for updates about all of this work, with more details to come. The Davis Drive rapidway will be complete in 2015, and we’re bringing an exceptional rapid transit system that will connect to other parts of York Region and help shape Newmarket’s growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vaughan Mills Centre Secondary Plan
    Clause No. 13 in Report No. 11 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, as amended, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 26, 2014. 13 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN (2010) – THE VAUGHAN MILLS CENTRE SECONDARY PLAN Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the deputation by Mark Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP, on behalf of a number of landowners who own lands between Weston Road and Highway 400, in the City of Vaughan. 2. Receipt of the following communications: 1. Jeffrey A. Abrams, City Clerk, City of Vaughan, dated March 24, 2014. 2. Michael Bissett, Bousfields Inc., on behalf of Rutherford Land Development Corporation, dated June 9, 2014. 3. A. Milliken Heisey, Papazian Heisey Myers, on behalf of Canadian National Railway, dated June 10, 2014. 4. Nima Kia, Lakeshore Group, on behalf of Stronach Trust, dated June 11, 2014 5. Steven Zakem, Aird & Berlis LLP, on behalf of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Magna International Inc., dated June 11, 2014 6. Mark Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP, on behalf of H & L Tile Inc. and Ledbury Investments Ltd., dated June 11, 2014 7. Meaghan McDermid, Davies Howe Partners LLP, on behalf of Tesmar Holdings Inc., dated June 11, 2014. Clause No. 13, Report No. 11 2 Committee of the Whole June 12, 2014 3. Adoption of the following recommendations in the report dated May 29, 2014 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Community Planning, with the following amendment to Recommendation 2: 2. Council protect for the potential re-establishment of a minor collector road connection to Weston Road opposite Astona Boulevard, to be reviewed by staff no sooner than 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • 7080 Yonge Street in the City of Vaughan – Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment Applications – Request for Direction Report
    REPORT FOR ACTION 7080 Yonge Street in the City of Vaughan – Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications – Request for Direction Report Date: February 5, 2021 To: Planning and Housing Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Wards: All SUMMARY This report responds to applications filed in the City of Vaughan to amend the City of Vaughan Official Plan and the City of Vaughan Zoning By-law which have been circulated to the City of Toronto in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act given the proximity to the City of Toronto. The report identifies the concerns of City Planning staff and makes recommendations on future steps to protect the City's interests concerning the applications. The applications are on the west side of Yonge Street, north of Steeles Avenue West. The applications propose two mixed-use buildings with a total of 652 residential units. The towers would be forty and twenty storeys in height and overall the proposal has a Floor Space Index ("FSI") of 9.84. The Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Development for the City of Vaughan has written a report to the City of Vaughan's Committee of the Whole regarding each application outlining some preliminary concerns with the applications including the proposed heights and densities. RECOMMENDATIONS The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, recommends that: 1. City Council endorse the January 18, 2021 letter from the Director, Community Planning, North York District (Attachment 3) to the City of Vaughan's Committee of the Whole which identify the concerns with the application at 7080 Yonge Street, including height and density.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report RECOMMENDED WARD ALIGNMENT
    Final Report RECOMMENDED WARD ALIGNMENT DECEMBER 2016 VAUGHAN WARD BOUNDARY REVIEW FINAL REPORT RECOMMENDED WARD ALIGNMENT DECEMBER 2016 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 7 3. WHY A VAUGHAN WARD BOUNDARY REVIEW (VAUGHAN WBR)? ......... 9 3.1 Purpose of the Vaughan WBR.................................................................................... 9 3.2 What is Effective Representation ............................................................................... 9 3.3 Examining the Status Quo ........................................................................................ 12 3.4 The Role of the OMB ............................................................................................... 13 4. VAUGHAN WBR STEP-BY-STEP .......................................................................... 14 5. VAUGHAN WBR COMMUNICATION & OUTREACH ..................................... 15 6. DEVELOPING THE OPTIONS ............................................................................... 17 7. THE PREFERRED OPTION .................................................................................... 22 7.1 Round 1 Civic Engagement and Public Consultation .............................................. 22 7.2 The Preferred Option and Refinements .................................................................... 22 7.3 Refinements
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Audit Report
    REPORT Single Family Curbside Waste and Participation Audit City of Toronto August 2016 159 Ridout Street South, London, Ont. N6C 3X7 Paul van der Werf Tel: 519-645-7733 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Results- Fall 2015 .............................................................................................................. 2 3.1 Set Out and Participation .................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Quantity of Waste Streams Collected................................................................................. 3 3.3 Waste Composition ............................................................................................................. 4 3.3.1 Overall ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.3.2 Residual Material ......................................................................................................... 5 3.3.3 Recycling .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Waste Collection – How to Make Sure It Makes Sense for Your Community
    AUTOMATED WASTE COLLECTION – HOW TO MAKE SURE IT MAKES SENSE FOR YOUR COMMUNITY Marc J. Rogoff, Ph.D. Richard E. Lilyquist, P.E. SCS Engineers Public Works Department Tampa, Florida City of Lakeland Lakeland, Florida Donald Ross Jeffrey L. Wood Kessler Consulting, Inc Solid Waste Division Tampa, Florida City of Lakeland Lakeland, Florida ABSTRACT Automated side-load trucks were first implemented in the City of Phoenix in the 1970s with the aim of ending The decision to implement solid waste collection the back-breaking nature of residential solid waste automation is a complex one and involves a number of collection, and to minimize worker injuries. Since then factors that should be considered, including engineering, thousands of public agencies and private haulers have risk management, technology assessment, costs, and moved from the once traditional read-load method of public acceptance. This paper analyzes these key issues waste collection to one that also provides the customer and provides a case study of how waste collection with a variety of choices in standardized, rollout carts. automation was considered by the City of Lakeland, These automated programs have enabled communities Florida. throughout the country to significantly reduce worker compensation claims and minimize insurance expenses, HOW DID AUTOMATED COLLECTION GET while at the same time offer opportunities to workers STARTED? who are not selected for their work assignment based solely on physical skills. The evolution of solid waste collection vehicles has been historically driven by an overwhelming desire by solid MODERN APPLICATION OF AUTOMATION waste professionals to collect more waste for less money, as well as lessening the physical demands on sanitation In an automated collection system, residents are provided workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Premium Lots Located in the North of Vaughan
    PREMIUM LOTS LOCATED IN THE NORTH OF VAUGHAN 1600 TESTON RD, VAUGHAN TESTON RD DUFFERIN ST 1 Council approved settlement agreement that is expected to be LPAT approved on June 26th, 2019. DEVELOPMENT STATUS DEVELOPMENT BREAKDOWN In July 2018, the Mackenzie Ridge Ratepayers Group appealed Type Unit Area (ac.) City Council’s decision on the Official Plan Amendment (OPA), Favourable Demographics in 40 ft. Single Detached 79 8.55 Zoning By-Law Amendment (ZBLA) and Draft Plan application for a High Demand Area the Property to the LPAT. The concerns of the ratepayers group 59 ft. Single Detached 3 0.42 was addressed through an added 10 metre wide, open space 1600 TESTON RD, VAUGHAN At $127,000, the average income 65 ft. Single Detached 8 1.21 landscape buffer adjacent to the existing homes on Giorgia within 3 km of the Site is $15,000 Crescent and Germana Place. On March 4th, 2019, a settlement Natural Heritage 13.91 higher than the average income of agreement was approved between Vaughan City Council and the The Land Services Group is pleased to offer for sale the property located at 1600 $112,000 in the City of Vaughan. owner. A Case Management Meeting is scheduled for June 26th, Vegetation Protection Zone 1.6 Teston Road (the “Property” or “Site”) in the City of Vaughan. The Site has a Council 2019, where the LPAT is expected to sign off on the settlement Stormwater Management Block 2.57 approved settlement agreement for 90 single detached lots, following an appeal to the agreement. A revised draft plan has been created to ensure a Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) by the Mackenzie Ridge Ratepayers Group over buffer between the existing residential lots and the development.
    [Show full text]
  • Aga Khan Museum and Ismaili Centre As Alternative Planning Model for Mosque Development
    Aga Khan Museum and Ismaili Centre as alternative planning model for mosque development. Haris S. Khan A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. April 12, 2021 ABSTRACT Multiculturalism is widely celebrated in Toronto as a cornerstone of our society. When multiculturalism moves outside festivals and food, groups make spatial claims of citizenship and identity, the experience is somewhat different. There is no doubt that some racialized minorities have fared well in the Greater Toronto Area. Their growth is no longer confined to low-income enclaves within the City of Toronto but into city suburbs. This growth comes with the increased demand for spatial citizenship through culturally suited social, recreational, commercial and religious space. It is here where the experience of multiculturalism changes. The inherently political and contentious process of land use planning and its response to individual groups needs for certain type of developments is the broad focus of this paper. The paper looks at how the practice of planning in the Greater Toronto Area has responded to social diversity in cities by studying the specific process of mosque development for Muslim Canadians. Mosque development has faced challenges in the planning arena through staunch opposition that often hides behind legitimate planning technicalities to express the personal distaste for a group of people. My goal was to understand the role of planning departments in recognizing and responding to the rise of these conflicts in land use development.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Plastics Management: Trends, Policy Responses, and the Role of International Co-Operation and Trade
    Improving Plastics Management: Trends, policy responses, and the role of international co-operation and trade POLICY PERSPECTIVES OECD ENVIRONMENT POLICY PAPER NO. 12 OECD . 3 This Policy Paper comprises the Background Report prepared by the OECD for the G7 Environment, Energy and Oceans Ministers. It provides an overview of current plastics production and use, the environmental impacts that this is generating and identifies the reasons for currently low plastics recycling rates, as well as what can be done about it. Disclaimers This paper is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and the arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. For Israel, change is measured between 1997-99 and 2009-11. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Copyright You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Shameek Vats UPCYCLING of HOSPITAL TEXTILES INTO FASHIONABLE GARMENTS Master of Science Thesis
    Shameek Vats UPCYCLING OF HOSPITAL TEXTILES INTO FASHIONABLE GARMENTS Master of Science Thesis Examiner: Professor Pertti Nousiainen and university lecturer Marja Rissanen Examiner and topic approved by the Council, Faculty of Engineering Sci- ences on 6 May 2015 i ABSTRACT TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Master‘s Degree Programme in Materials Engineering VATS, SHAMEEK: Upcycling of hospital textiles into fashionable garments Master of Science Thesis, 64 pages, 3 Appendix pages July 2015 Major: Polymers and Biomaterials Examiner: Professor Pertti Nousianen and University lecturer Marja Rissanen Keywords: Upcycling, Textiles, Cotton polyester fibres, Viscose fibres, Polymer Fibers, Degradation, Life Cycle Assessment(LCA), Recycling, Cellulose fibres, Waste Hierarchy, Waste Management, Downcycling The commercial textile circulation in Finland works that a company is responsi- ble for supplying and maintenance of the textiles. The major customers include hospitals and restaurants chains. When the textiles are degraded and unsuitable for use, a part of it is acquired by companies, like, TAUKO Designs for further use. The rest part is unfortunately sent to the landfills. We tried to answer some research questions, whether the waste fabrics show the properties good enough to be used to manufacture new garments. If the prop- erties of the waste textiles are not conducive enough to be made into new fab- rics,whether or not other alternatives could be explored. A different view of the thesis also tries to reduce the amount of textile waste in the landfills by explor- ing different methods. This was done by characterizing the waste for different properties. The amount of cellulose polyester fibres was calculated along with breaking force and mass per unit area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of Metro Vancouver's Green Bin Program
    The Effectiveness of Metro Vancouver’s Green Bin Program Alexander M. Lui1, Helen Heacock2 Abstract Background and Aims Metro Vancouver is implementing a disposal ban on all food scraps from entering the landfills and incinerators by the year 2015. In order to prepare the city’s residents, a food scraps recycling program, known as the Green Bin Program, was initiated in 2013 for all single family households. The aim of this research project was to measure public knowledge and awareness of the program across various demographics and collect data on the general opinion of it. Methods An online survey was created using SurveyMonkey, a survey generating website, and distributed online via Facebook and e-mail. The results from these surveys were analyzed using NCSS software to determine statistical significance via a chi-squared analysis with alpha (a) = 0.05. Results There were a total of 70 respondents. Of these, 68% of the respondents indicated that the Green Bin Program should stay the way it currently is without any further changes. 8% of the respondents were in favour of stopping the program and the remaining 24% indicated that the program needed some modifications such as more education/promotional material, implementing the program into apartment complexes and more garbage pickup days to prevent pest and odor problems. Age category, location of residence, and educational background were analyzed against other variables in the survey that tested the knowledge and usefulness of the Green Bin Program. Looking at these 3 variables in relation to knowledge: there was no association between location of residence, age, and educational background, with knowledge of what could go into the green bin (p= 0.76, p= 0.53, p= 0.33, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment No. 744 to the Vaughan Official Plan – the Block 40/47 Secondary Plan
    Clause No. 7 in Report No. 13 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on September 11, 2014. Council also received the following communications: 1. Gillian Evans and David Toyne, Landowners, City of Vaughan, dated September 10, 2014. 2. Quinto Annibale, Partner, Loopstra Nixon LLP, on behalf of Maria Pandolfo, Yolanda Pandolfo, Laura Pandolfo, Giuseppe Pandolfo and Cathy Campione, dated September 10, 2014. 7 AMENDMENT NO. 744 TO THE VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN – THE BLOCK 40/47 SECONDARY PLAN Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the following communications: 1. David Donnelly, Barrister & Solicitor, Donnelly Law, on behalf of Ms. Gillian Evans and Mr. David Toyne, dated August 7, 2014. 2. Quinto Annibale, Partner, Loopstra Nixon LLP, on behalf of Maria Pandolfo, Yolanda Pandolfo, Laura Pandolfo, Giuseppe Pandolfo and Cathy Campione, dated September 3, 2014. 2. Receipt of the following deputations: 1. Quinto Annibale, Partner, Loopstra Nixon LLP, on behalf of Maria Pandolfo, Yolanda Pandolfo, Laura Pandolfo, Giuseppe Pandolfo and Cathy Campione regarding 10390 Pine Valley Drive, City of Vaughan. 2. Mark Yarranton, Partner, KLM Planning Partners Inc. on behalf of Block 40/47 Developers Group regarding the Block 40/47 lands. 3. Gillian Evans, Landowner, City of Vaughan, regarding 10240 Pine Valley Drive, City of Vaughan. Clause No. 7, Report No. 13 2 Committee of the Whole September 4, 2014 3. Receipt of the private verbal update from the Regional Solicitor. 4. Adoption of the following recommendations contained in the report dated August 13, 2014 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Community Planning: 1.
    [Show full text]