DOCSLIB.ORG

General Fishing Atlas Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ATLAS COVER Pages FISH 2021.qxp_ATLAS COVER Pages FISH 2/17/21 10:42 AM Page 1 Kansas Fishing Atlas 2021 Public Fishing Access Includes Walk-in Fishing Access (WIFA) Get our mobile app HuntFish KS ATLAS COVER Pages FISH 2021.qxp_ATLAS COVER Pages FISH 2/17/21 10:42 AM Page 2 WIFA Area Rules Walk-in Fishing Access (WIFA), formerly F.I.S.H., sites 6. Avoid stretching fences when crossing them, and use are leased from private landowners and are typically open to fence stiles where available. public fishing from March 1 – Oct. 31, though some proper- ties are open year-round. The WIFA program provides 7. Do not attempt to contact cooperating landowners to ask anglers increased opportunities to enjoy fishing on the state’s about fishing other portions of their land. streams and small impoundments, all that is required is a state fishing license. Funding for the program is provided Regulations governing WIFA area use: through fishing license revenues and Sport Fish Restoration Funds. Please observe all rules and regulations, and remem- • Impounded WIFA waters have a creel limit of two channel ber that common sense and ethical behavior will influence catfish, a creel limit of two largemouth bass, and an 18-inch the future of the program. minimum length limit on largemouth bass. Otherwise, all Kansas fishing regulations and statewide creel limits apply. It’s The following guidelines help maintain a good relation- especially important for anglers using the sites to respect and fol- ship between landowners and anglers: low the rules that apply on WIFA properties. You do not need to contact the landowner for permission on WIFA waters. 1. Look for the WIFA signs (pictured below) before entering the property. Sites may have been withdrawn from the pro- • Seining is prohibited on all WIFA waters, and trotlines and gram. If you do not see signs, do not enter. setlines are prohibited on impoundments under 1,201 acres in size (KAR 115-8-6); No swimming (KAR 115-8-8); Camping 2. Obey lease boundaries. Stay within 50 feet of the stream by posted notice only (KAR 115-8-9); No pets, except on a or impoundment shoreline. If the WIFA property is a stream, leash (KAR 115-8-10); No horseback riding (KAR 115-8-11); fish only on the side of the stream that is posted as an access No stocking or release of wildlife, including the dumping of site. Do not walk or fish on adjacent property. live bait (KAR 115-8-12); Vehicles shall be operated only as authorized (KAR 115-8-13); No fireworks (KAR 115-8-14); 3. Respect the rights of landowners, as well as others using No unauthorized fires (115-8-15); The discharge of firearms is the area. Treat the land as if it were your own. prohibited (KAR 115-8-5); No littering (KAR 115-8-18); No cereal malt beverages or alcoholic liquor (KAR 115-8-19); 4. Take all trash with you when you leave. If someone before Destructive acts such as digging or destroying signs or vege- you has irresponsibly left trash, please take a moment and tation is prohibited (KAR 115-8-20). pick it up, too. • All Kansas boating laws are in effect on WIFA waters. 5. Do not open gates or enter properties with vehicles unless authorized. Park along the road or in designated parking areas. Leave field-access, drives, and rural roads open so that landowners moving large implements may pass. Due to unforseen conditions and/or renovations, some properties may be dry, lower than normal or flooded. Water quality and vegetation may vary among properties. REGULATIONS WALK-IN FISHING ACCESS AREAS PRIVATE 1. No seining or dumping of live bait. 2. Channel catfish daily Creel Limit of two per person. 3. 4. The following activities are prohibited on WIFA waters. > Discharge of firearms > Horseback riding LAND > Unauthorized operation of vehicles > Camping > Littering > Fires or fireworks BEYOND THIS > Pets (except on a leash) > Swimming > Cereal malt beverages or alcoholic liquor NO TRESPASSING > Destructive acts such as digging or destruction POINT ANY OTHER TIME of signs or vegetation OPEN DATES OPEN DATES PLEASE TAKE YOUR PLEASE TAKE YOUR Above regulations are covered by March 1 TRASH WITH YOU YEAR TRASH WITH YOU No K.A.R. 115-8-1 through K.A.R.115-8-20 - To Report Wildlife Violations, Call 1-877-426-3843 October 31 ROUND Trespassing PROJECT OF THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, PARKS AND TOURISM PROJECT OF THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, PARKS AND TOURISM PROJECT OF THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, PARKS AND TOURISM PROJECT OF THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, PARKS AND TOURISM Look for these signs before accessing a WIFA area. ATLAS TEXT Pages FISH 2021.qxp_ATLAS TEXT Pages FISH 2/17/21 10:41 AM Page 1 Using the Fishing Atlas The maps in this atlas show a variety of owned by a city or county government. open year-round, see legend. Accessing public fishing areas, as well as public Community lakes that are managed for the WIFA properties prior to or after the lands across Kansas. WIFA areas are pri- public fishing through the department’s indicated access period is prohibited. vately-owned ponds or streams the Kansas Community Fisheries Assistance Program Maps are at a scale of 1:277,500 (1 inch Department of Wildlife, Parks and (CFAP) and state fishing lakes are labeled represents 4.38 miles) and were compiled Tourism (KDWPT) has leased and opened with the impoundment name and marked according to conventional cartographic to public fishing. Each map also shows all by the blue fish symbol. There are no addi- standards using the most reliable informa- federal reservoirs, state fishing lakes, river tional fees to fish at state fishing lakes or tion available. KDWPT does not guaran- access sites, and community lakes. To find community lakes in the CFAP program. tee freedom from errors or inaccuracies fishing areas near you, consult the legend Community lakes not in the CFAP pro- and disclaims any legal responsibility or below and then locate the corresponding gram are also labeled with the impound- liability for interpretations made from access locations indicated on the maps. ment name and are marked by a red octa- these maps, or decisions based thereon. The maps on the following page show gon symbol as local governments manag- This atlas is a continual work in which counties have federal, state, or com- ing these lakes may require a permit progress and any comments, suggestions, munity fishing opportunities, as well as and/or additional fees for fishing access. or corrections are welcomed. Any such those with WIFA sites. Most WIFA areas are open to fishing comments may be submitted to Community lakes are impoundments from March 1 to Oct. 31, but some are [email protected]. FISHING ATLAS LEGEND Interstate Route State Boundary Reservoirs, State Fishing Lakes Community Lakes (No Additional Fees Required) US Route County Boundary River/Stream Access Points State Route Federal or State Land Community Lakes (Local Permit Required) Street or Road Military Reservation WIFA Tract Labeling Access Period Size/Length Boating Restrictions MO = March 1-Oct. 31 # Total Acres(ac) A = All Boats Allowed JD = Jan. 1-Dec. 31 # Total Miles(mi) C = Carry-In Boats Only Urban Area WIFA Tracts P = Paddlesports Allowed NB = No Boats Allowed Counties With Public Fishing Counties with Opportunities WIFA Areas CHEYENNE DONIPHAN CHEYENNE DONIPHAN RAWLINS DECATUR RAWLINS DECATUR NORTON PHILLIPS SMITH JEWELL REPUBLIC WASHINGTON MARSHALL NEMAHA BROWN NORTON PHILLIPS SMITH JEWELL REPUBLIC WASHINGTON MARSHALL NEMAHA BROWN CLOUD ATCHISON CLOUD ATCHISON SHERMAN SHERMAN THOMAS SHERIDAN GRAHAM JACKSON THOMAS SHERIDAN GRAHAM JACKSON ROOKS OSBORNE MITCHELL CLAY RILEY POTTAWATOMIE ROOKS OSBORNE MITCHELL CLAY RILEY POTTAWATOMIE JEFFERSON JEFFERSON REGION 1 OTTAWA OTTAWA WYANDOTTE LINCOLN REGION 2 OFFICE LINCOLN SHAWNEE WALLACE WALLACE LOGAN GOVE LOGAN GOVE OFFICE DICKINSON LEAVEN- TREGO ELLIS RUSSELL DICKINSON LEAVEN- GEARY Topeka WORTH GEARY WORTH SHAWNEE JOHNSON JOHNSON Hays SALINE SALINE WABAUNSEE WABAUNSEE ELLSWORTH MORRIS OSAGE DOUGLAS ELLSWORTH MORRIS OSAGE DOUGLAS TREGO ELLIS RUSSELL GREELEY WICHITA LYON FRANKLIN MIAMI GREELEY WICHITA LYON FRANKLIN MIAMI SCOTT LANE NESS RUSH BARTON SCOTT LANE NESS RUSH BARTON McPHERSON MARION McPHERSON MARION RICE CHASE RICE CHASE COFFEY COFFEY ANDERSON LINN ANDERSON LINN PAWNEE HAMILTON KEARNY FINNEY HAMILTON KEARNY FINNEY STAFFORD HODGEMAN STAFFORD RENO HARVEY RENO HARVEY PAWNEE GREENWOOD WOODSON ALLEN BOURBON BUTLER GREENWOOD WOODSON ALLEN BOURBON HODGEMAN EDWARDS REGION 3 GRAY EDWARDS FORD SEDGWICK PRATT OFFICE PRATT STANTON GRANT STANTON GRANT HASKELL KIOWA WILSON NEOSHO HASKELL KIOWA WILSON NEOSHO KINGMAN Wichita CRAWFORD KINGMAN CRAWFORD GRAY ELK ELK FORD OPERATIONS SEDGWICK BUTLER MEADE MEADE MORTON CLARK SUMNER COWLEY MORTON CLARK BARBER SUMNER COWLEY STEVENS SEWARD STEVENS SEWARD OFFICE HARPER COMANCHE HARPER MONT- LABETTE CHEROKEE Pratt CHAUTAUQUA GOMERY MONT- CHEROKEE COMANCHE BARBER CHAUTAUQUA GOMERY LABETTE ATLAS TEXT Pages FISH 2021.qxp_ATLAS TEXT Pages FISH 2/17/21 10:41 AM Page 2 Fishing Reports and Newsletters Fishing Reports Fishing reports are available on ksoutdoors.com and provide information regarding seasonal fishing trends on your favorite lakes and reservoirs. On ksoutdoors.com, anglers can also access Google Earth files showing the locations of fish attractors, like the “Fish Cubes” shown here at Wilson Reservoir. View at: ksoutdoors.com/Fishing/Fishing-Reports District Fisheries Newsletters Get the inside scoop on sampling efforts, lake management and updates about your favorite fishing hole by reading newsletters from district fisheries biologists. You can even sign-up to receive area-specific newsletters via email. Use the link below to navigate to the “Newsletter Sign- up Forms.” Sign up at: ksoutdoors.com/KDWPT-Info/News Fishing Forecast K E The 2021 Kansas Fishing Forecast highlights Kansas’ top fishing spots.
Recommended publications
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]

    Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-18054, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333-15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Parts 26, 32, 36, and 71 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000] RIN 1018-BD79 2019–2020 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open seven National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) that are currently closed to hunting and sport fishing. In addition, we expand hunting and sport fishing at 70 other NWRs, and add pertinent station-specific regulations for other NWRs that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing for the 2019–2020 season. We also formally open 15 units of the National Fish Hatchery System to hunting and sport fishing. We also add pertinent station- specific regulations that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing at these 15 National Fish Hatcheries (NFHs) for the 2019–2020 season. This rule includes global administrative updates to every NWR entry in our refuge- specific regulations and the reorganization of general public use regulations. We remove approximately 2,100 regulations that will have no impact on the administration of hunting and sport fishing within the National Wildlife Refuge System. We also simplify over 2,900 refuge- specific regulations to comply with a Presidential mandate to adhere to plain language standards 1 and to reduce the regulatory burden on the public.
  • Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary

    Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary

    2 Kansas Fishing 0 Regulations 0 5 Summary The new Community Fisheries Assistance Program (CFAP) promises to increase opportunities for anglers to fish close to home. For detailed information, see Page 16. PURCHASE FISHING LICENSES AND VIEW WEEKLY FISHING REPORTS ONLINE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS' WEBSITE, WWW.KDWP.STATE.KS.US TABLE OF CONTENTS Wildlife and Parks Offices, e-mail . Zebra Mussel, White Perch Alerts . State Record Fish . Lawful Fishing . Reservoirs, Lakes, and River Access . Are Fish Safe To Eat? . Definitions . Fish Identification . Urban Fishing, Trout, Fishing Clinics . License Information and Fees . Special Event Permits, Boats . FISH Access . Length and Creel Limits . Community Fisheries Assistance . Becoming An Outdoors-Woman (BOW) . Common Concerns, Missouri River Rules . Master Angler Award . State Park Fees . WILDLIFE & PARKS OFFICES KANSAS WILDLIFE & Maps and area brochures are available through offices listed on this page and from the PARKS COMMISSION department website, www.kdwp.state.ks.us. As a cabinet-level agency, the Kansas Office of the Secretary AREA & STATE PARK OFFICES Department of Wildlife and Parks is adminis- 1020 S Kansas Ave., Rm 200 tered by a secretary of Wildlife and Parks Topeka, KS 66612-1327.....(785) 296-2281 Cedar Bluff SP....................(785) 726-3212 and is advised by a seven-member Wildlife Cheney SP .........................(316) 542-3664 and Parks Commission. All positions are Pratt Operations Office Cheyenne Bottoms WA ......(620) 793-7730 appointed by the governor with the commis- 512 SE 25th Ave. Clinton SP ..........................(785) 842-8562 sioners serving staggered four-year terms. Pratt, KS 67124-8174 ........(620) 672-5911 Council Grove WA..............(620) 767-5900 Serving as a regulatory body for the depart- Crawford SP .......................(620) 362-3671 ment, the commission is a non-partisan Region 1 Office Cross Timbers SP ..............(620) 637-2213 board, made up of no more than four mem- 1426 Hwy 183 Alt., P.O.
  • The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods

    The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods

    The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods ... Have We Forgotten? Introduction - This report was originally written as NWS Technical Attachment 81-11 in 1981, the thirtieth anniversary of this devastating flood. The co-authors of the original report were Robert Cox, Ernest Kary, Lee Larson, Billy Olsen, and Craig Warren, all hydrologists at the Missouri Basin River Forecast Center at that time. Although most of the original report remains accurate today, Robert Cox has updated portions of the report in light of occurrences over the past twenty years. Comparisons of the 1951 flood to the events of 1993 as well as many other parenthetic remarks are examples of these revisions. The Storms of 1951 - Fifty years ago, the stage was being set for one of the greatest natural disasters ever to hit the Midwest. May, June and July of 1951 saw record rainfalls over most of Kansas and Missouri, resulting in record flooding on the Kansas, Osage, Neosho, Verdigris and Missouri Rivers. Twenty-eight lives were lost and damage totaled nearly 1 billion dollars. (Please note that monetary damages mentioned in this report are in 1951 dollars, unless otherwise stated. 1951 dollars can be equated to 2001 dollars using a factor of 6.83. The total damage would be $6.4 billion today.) More than 150 communities were devastated by the floods including two state capitals, Topeka and Jefferson City, as well as both Kansas Cities. Most of Kansas and Missouri as well as large portions of Nebraska and Oklahoma had monthly precipitation totaling 200 percent of normal in May, 300 percent in June, and 400 percent in July of 1951.
  • Regional Goal Action Plans Section

    Regional Goal Action Plans Section

    CIMARRON REGIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION PLANS CIMARRON PRIORITY GOAL #1 REDUCE THE RATE OF DECLINE OF THE OGALLALA AQUIFER IN THE REGION THROUGH VOLUNTARY, INCENTIVE-BASED CONSERVATION AS ASSESSED EVERY FIVE YEARS CIMARRON PRIORITY GOAL #2 EXTEND THE USABLE LIFETIME OF THE OGALLALA AQUIFER IN THE REGION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION (IRRIGATION, INDUSTRIAL, MUNICIPAL, ETC.), NEW CROP VARIETIES AND CONSERVATION FOR ALL USES AND FOR MANY GENERATIONS Goals 1 and 2 seek to reduce water use in the region therefore the following actions apply to both ACTION STEPS • Define and quantify the regional aquifer decline, establishing a baseline for comparison • Work with partners, including KDA and NRCS, to develop baseline of water saving technologies in use and voluntary incentive based conservation occurring and a method to track participation. Consider using the annual water reporting system, producer surveys and other means to identify water saving efforts if needed. • Secure funding, including statutory SGF transfer to SWPF, to support water conservation programs and evaluation of technologies, crop varieties and water management to save water. • Provide water users with information on available tools and programs, including but not limited to; LEMAS, WCAs, Multi-Year Flex Accounts, Water Banks, Irrigation Scheduling, RCPP-Soil Probe program through GMDs, K-State Extension tools, K-State Research/farms and additional tools and programs as made available. • Change producer perception from a “use it or lose it” mentality. • Use demonstration projects to educate producers to economically reduce water used. (Water technology farms, LEMAS, WCAs, K-State Research and Extension farm projects and other water management and water efficiency projects can provide valuable examples and information to producers to encourage their participation in water saving efforts.) • GMD3 and DWR work with producers to establish LEMAs and WCAs.
  • Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge Fishing Expansion

    Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge Fishing Expansion

    U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION STATEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION The Service proposes to expand fishing opportunities (boating regulations changes) on 1,360 acres of the Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge, Kansas in accordance with existing State, local, and Refuge-specific regulations (50 CFR 32.35). Within the spirit and intent of the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and other statutes, orders, and policies that protect fish and wildlife resources, I have established the following administrative record and determined that the following proposed action is categorically excluded from NEPA documentation requirements consistent with 40 CFR 1508.4, 43 CFR 46.205, and 516 DM 8.5. The Service has fully satisfied the other requirements for expanding these opportunities on the refuge, including: □X determining that the opportunities are compatible with the purposes for which the refuge was established and the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System (see attached Compatibility Determination); □X ensuring the opportunities are consistent with existing State, local, and refuge- specific regulations (50 CFR 32.35); *Use of signs and brochures may supplement the refuge-specific regulations □X complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (see attached); □X complying with the Endangered Species Act section 7 evaluation (see attached) OR □ N/A because there are no candidate, threatened or endangered species present; □X complying with the National Historic Preservation Act section 106 consultation; OR □ N/A because there are no cultural or historic resources present; The Service is, therefore, waiving the requirement to prepare an opening package in compliance with Service policy (605 FW 2.9A).
  • Kirwin Lake WRAPS 9 Element Watershed Protection Plan

    Kirwin Lake WRAPS 9 Element Watershed Protection Plan

    Kirwin Lake WRAPS 9 Element Watershed Protection Plan Water Quality Impairments Directly Addressed: • Kirwin Lake Eutrophication TMDL (Medium Priority) Other Impairments Which Stand to Benefit from Watershed Plan Implementation: • Kirwin Lake Dissolved Oxygen TMDL (Medium Priority) • Bow Creek Near Stockton Total Phosphorous 303(d) listing • North Fork Solomon River Near Glade Total Phosphorous 303(d) listing • Logan City Lake Eutrophication 303(d) listing Determination of Priority Areas Information collected by the Graham, Norton and Phillips county NRCS offices was used by KSU in a SWAT model to identify priority HUC12s. Because of extremely low soil erosion rates, the SLT requested KDHE verify the SWAT model results. KDHE used the Cropland/Slope Analysis method to verify the SWAT model data. The results confirmed the SWAT results identifying nine HUC12s. This method also identified eleven additional HUC12s as significant potential sediment contributors. The SLT agreed to develop two priority area, Tiers 1 and 2, above Kirwin Lake to focus BMP implementation towards addressing nonpoint source impairment issues. Best Management Practice and Load Reduction Goals Phosphorus Load to Watershed Plan Kirwin Lake Current Meet Kirwin Lake Phosphorus Load Phosphorus Load EU TMDL (143,000 lbs/yr) Reduction Goal (48,400 lbs/yr) (94,600 lbs/yr) BMPs to be implemented in association Watershed Plan Duration and Costs with Watershed Plan: • Total plan length = 30 years • Cropland-related BMPs o Load reduction goal of plan met during year 30 o Permanent vegetation • o Grassed waterways Total plan cost = $25,802,172 Cropland BMP Implementation o No-till cropland production o . $15,638,153 o Terraces Livestock BMP Implementation o Nutrient management o .
  • Bulletin Published Qu.4Ktekly

    Bulletin Published Qu.4Ktekly

    BULLETIN PUBLISHED QU.4KTEKLY March, 1992 No. 1 THE WINTER BIRD COUNT FOR 1991 Max (:. Thompson The winter bird count of 1991 will eo down in KOS history as the vear with the largest number of counts ever taken in the state. A record 42 counts were made, 43 it' yo; count one that did not conform to the guidelines. There were only 582 participants but a near record 150 species werr seen. Some species were recorded only during the count week and if they had been put into the counts, there would have been a new record. The highest number ever recorded was 152 in 1990. The highest number of species observed was shared by Ernporia and Manhattan with 83 species each. This could very well be called the "vear of the gull". There were eight species seen, including two gulls new to the count. There were two probable California Gulls seen, one on the Udall-Winfield count and one at the Wilson Reservoir count. There was one probable Black-legged Kittiwake seen at Olathe. Gulls are notoriously hard to identify and sightings without specimens are always open to question. A Pomarine Jaeger seen at Junction City was a first winter count record. Another new species seen on the 1991 count were the five Trumpeter Swans at Webster Reservoir. Unfortunately, four of the five were later shot and killed by persons unknown. Another I'rumpeter Swan was reported from Sawyer. While there were no real surprises in the waterfowl counted, there were some surpris- ing numbers. Blue-winged Teal were present with 18 at Garden City and 400 at Parsons.
  • Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas

    Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas

    Prepared in cooperation with the O'O BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4230 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey B. E. D. A. Dam overlooking Kirwin Reservoir B. Waconda Lake C. Webster Reservoir D. Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge E. Gravity corer mounted on pontoon boat (photographs A-D taken by author; photograph E taken by David P. Mau, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas) U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas By VICTORIA G. CHRISTENSEN Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4230 Lawrence, Kansas 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director The use of brand, firm, or trade names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 4821 Quail Crest Place Building 810 Lawrence, KS 66049-3839 Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract...............................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction
  • Kansas' Fall River, Section 319 Success Story

    Kansas' Fall River, Section 319 Success Story

    Section 319 NONPOINT SOURCE PROGRAM SUCCESS STORY Cooperative Watershed Management ImprovesKansas Dissolved Oxygen Levels in Fall River Nonpoint source pollution from grazingland affected water quality in Waterbody Improved the upper Fall River watershed, prompting the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) to add the river to the state’s 1998 Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) list of impaired waters for low levels of dissolved oxygen (DO). In cooperation with the local Kansas Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (KS WRAPS) Upper Fall River Project, project partners in Greenwood County implemented several agricultural best management practices (BMPs) throughout the watershed. River monitoring data collected between 2000 and 2011 show that waterbodies in the upper Fall River watershed now meet the DO criteria required to protect the aquatic life support designated use. As a result, KDHE removed one segment (composed of nearly 144 miles of streams) in the upper Fall River watershed from the 2010 list of impaired waters for the DO impairment. Problem Fall River Watershed The headwaters of Fall River (East and West CHASE branches) originate in the upper northwest corner of Greenwood County in southeastern Kansas. The river flows southeast, draining numerous tributar- ies before merging with the Verdigris River near the city of Neodesha (Figure 1). In addition to the waterbody’s aquatic life support designated use, KDHE has designated the East and West branches of Fall River as “Exceptional State Waters,” defined as any surface waters or surface water segments of remarkable quality or of significant ecological or recreational value. The state affords such waters Impaired for the highest level of water quality protection.
  • Kansas Freshwater Mussel Populations of the Upper Saline And

    Kansas Freshwater Mussel Populations of the Upper Saline And

    TRANSACTIONS OF THE KANSAS Vol. 119, no. 3 ACADEMY OF SCIENCE p. 325-335 (2016) Kansas freshwater mussel populations of the upper Saline and Smoky Hill rivers with emphasis on the status of the Cylindrical Papershell (Anodontoides ferussacianus) BRYAN J. SOWARDS, RYAN L. PINKALL, WESTON L. FLEMING, JORDAN R. HOFMEIER AND WILLIAM J. STARK Fort Hays State University, Hays, Kansas [email protected] The Cylindrical Papershell (Anodontoides ferussacianus) is a fast-growing, short-lived freshwater mussel that occurs throughout the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada but appears to be declining in portions of its range. Its distribution in Kansas, once encompassing most of the Kansas and Missouri river basins, is now limited to the upper Saline and Smoky Hill rivers in the west-central portion of the state. We qualitatively surveyed freshwater mussels at 19 sites on both the Saline and Smoky Hill rivers, with emphasis on assessing the status of A. ferussacianus. We collected 28 live mussels in the Saline River, including eight A. ferussacianus, and 503 live mussels in the Smoky Hill River, including 12 A. ferussacianus. We also estimated mussel density at five sites with the highest relative abundances of A. ferussacianus. Densities of A. ferussacianus ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 individuals per m2. Most A. ferussacianus were collected in run habitats near riffles, beaver dams, and lowhead dams. In addition to A. ferussacianus, we collected three other mussel species in the Saline River, and six other species in the Smoky Hill River. Total mussel density ranged from 0.08 to 0.13 individuals per m2 at sites in the Saline River, and 0.48 to 2.00 individuals per m2 at sites in the Smoky Hill River.
  • 2020 Kansas Statutes

    2020 Kansas Statutes

    2020 Kansas Statutes 74-4545. State park authority authorized to negotiate and renegotiate leases for lands in Cheney, Clinton, Elk City, Fall River, Lovewell, Toronto, Perry, Tuttle Creek, Webster and Wilson state parks. The state park and resources authority is hereby authorized to negotiate and to renegotiate leases for lands in designated state parks with agencies of the federal government or with the state of Kansas, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, having control of lands to provide for approximate changes in acreage within the designated parks as follows: Cheney State Park, Cheney reservoir, located in Kingman, Reno and Sedgwick counties; decrease in acreage by approximately 306 acres—being that area south of 21st street lying in Kingman county; that area south of 21st street lying in Sedgwick county, except the triangular area south of 21st street between the old and new river channels; and that area north of 21st street lying east of F.A.S. route 556, Sedgwick county, and F.A.S. route 659, Reno county. Fall River State Park, Fall River reservoir, located in Greenwood county, decrease in acreage by approximately 2028 acres located in the Casner Creek cove and the Badger Creek cove; and decrease in acreage by approximately 130 acres, being that area lying to the north in the upper drainage of the Quarry Bay area, described as that portion lying east of the access road in the S1/2, SE1/4, NE1/4, section 26, and that portion lying north of and east of the access road in the SW1/4, section 25, and in the N1/2, NE1/4, SE1/4, section 26, all in township 27S, range 12E.
  • Waconda Lake 2001 Sedimentation Survey

    Waconda Lake 2001 Sedimentation Survey

    WACONDA LAKE 2001 SEDIMENTATION SURVEY U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved 0MB No. 0704-0188 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED February 2003 Final _________________________________ 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Waconda Lake PR 2001 Sedimentation Survey 6. AUThOR(S) Ronald L. Ferrari ___________________________ 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Denver CO 80225-0007 REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) - 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Federal Center, P0 Box 25007, AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Denver CO 80225-0007 DIBR 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Hard copy available at Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) surveyed Waconda Lake in July 2001 to develop a topographic map and compute the present storage-elevation relationship (area-capacity tables). The data were used to calculate reservoir capacity lost due to sediment accumulation since dam closure in October of 1967. The underwater survey was conducted in July of 2001 near reservoir elevation 1,455 feet (project datum). The underwater survey used sonic depth recording equipment interfaced with a global positioning system (GPS) that gave continuous sounding positions throughout the underwater portions of the reservoir covered by the survey vessel. The above-water topography was determined by digitizing the developed contour lines from the U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle (USGS quad) maps of the reservoir area.