Headwater Streams of the Flint Hills
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary
2 Kansas Fishing 0 Regulations 0 5 Summary The new Community Fisheries Assistance Program (CFAP) promises to increase opportunities for anglers to fish close to home. For detailed information, see Page 16. PURCHASE FISHING LICENSES AND VIEW WEEKLY FISHING REPORTS ONLINE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS' WEBSITE, WWW.KDWP.STATE.KS.US TABLE OF CONTENTS Wildlife and Parks Offices, e-mail . Zebra Mussel, White Perch Alerts . State Record Fish . Lawful Fishing . Reservoirs, Lakes, and River Access . Are Fish Safe To Eat? . Definitions . Fish Identification . Urban Fishing, Trout, Fishing Clinics . License Information and Fees . Special Event Permits, Boats . FISH Access . Length and Creel Limits . Community Fisheries Assistance . Becoming An Outdoors-Woman (BOW) . Common Concerns, Missouri River Rules . Master Angler Award . State Park Fees . WILDLIFE & PARKS OFFICES KANSAS WILDLIFE & Maps and area brochures are available through offices listed on this page and from the PARKS COMMISSION department website, www.kdwp.state.ks.us. As a cabinet-level agency, the Kansas Office of the Secretary AREA & STATE PARK OFFICES Department of Wildlife and Parks is adminis- 1020 S Kansas Ave., Rm 200 tered by a secretary of Wildlife and Parks Topeka, KS 66612-1327.....(785) 296-2281 Cedar Bluff SP....................(785) 726-3212 and is advised by a seven-member Wildlife Cheney SP .........................(316) 542-3664 and Parks Commission. All positions are Pratt Operations Office Cheyenne Bottoms WA ......(620) 793-7730 appointed by the governor with the commis- 512 SE 25th Ave. Clinton SP ..........................(785) 842-8562 sioners serving staggered four-year terms. Pratt, KS 67124-8174 ........(620) 672-5911 Council Grove WA..............(620) 767-5900 Serving as a regulatory body for the depart- Crawford SP .......................(620) 362-3671 ment, the commission is a non-partisan Region 1 Office Cross Timbers SP ..............(620) 637-2213 board, made up of no more than four mem- 1426 Hwy 183 Alt., P.O. -
Fall River Lake: Comparison of Reservoir Inflow and Local Bias-Correction Technique for Cmip3 and Cmip5 Climate Projections
FALL RIVER LAKE: COMPARISON OF RESERVOIR INFLOW AND LOCAL BIAS-CORRECTION TECHNIQUE FOR CMIP3 AND CMIP5 CLIMATE PROJECTIONS, AND LEGAL ANALYSIS OF LOW- FLOW REGULATION By REBECCA ANN WARD HARJO Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1998 Master of Science in Civil Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1999 Juris Doctorate Texas Wesleyan University School of Law Fort Worth, Texas 2006 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2017 FALL RIVER LAKE: COMPARISON OF RESERVOIR INFLOW AND LOCAL BIAS CORRECTION TECHNIQUE FOR CMIP3 AND CMIP5 CLIMATE PROJECTIONS, AND LEGAL ANALYSIS OF LOW- FLOW REGULATION Dissertation Approved: Glenn Brown Dissertation Adviser Dan Storm Jason Vogel Art Stoecker ii Name: REBECCA ANN WARD HARJO Date of Degree: MAY 2017 Title of Study: FALL RIVER LAKE: COMPARISON OF RESERVOIR INFLOW AND LOCAL BIAS CORRECTION TECHNIQUE FOR CMIP3 AND CMIP5 CLIMATE PROJECTIONS, AND LEGAL ANALYSIS OF LOW-FLOW REGULATION Major Field: BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING Scope and Method of Study: This case study compares the World Climate Research Programme's (WCRP's) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) against the phase 3 (CMIP3) guidance for a case study location of Fall River Lake in Kansas. A new method of locally calibrating reservoir inflow climate-change ensembles using monthly factors derived by averaging correction factors calculated from a range of exceedance values was proposed and compared against calibrating only the mean and median of the ensemble. Federal agency reservoir operations and statutory, regulatory, and compact legal provisions affecting Verdigris Basin in Kansas were also analyzed. -
Kansas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision
United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Tulsa District Oklahoma Resource Area September 1991 KANSAS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Reader: This doCument contains the combined Kansas Record of Decision (ROD) and Resource Management Plan (RMP). The ROD and RMP are combined to streamline our mandated land-use-planning requirements and to provide the reader with a useable finished product. The ROD records the decisions of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for administration of approximately 744,000 acres of Federal mineral estate within the Kansas Planning Area. The Planning Area encompasses BLM adm in i sterad sp 1 it-estate mi nera 1 s and Federa 1 minerals under Federal surface administered by other Federal Agencies within the State of Kansas. The Kansas RMP and appendices provide direction and guidance to BLM Managers in the formulation of decisions effecting the management of Federal mineral estate within the planning area for the next 15 years. The Kansas RMP was extracted from the Proposed Kansas RMP/FIES. The issuance of this ROD and RMP completes the BLM land use planning process for the State of Kansas. We now move to implementation of the plan. We wish to thank all the individuals and groups who participated in this effort these past two years, without their help we could not have completed this process. er~ 1_' Area Manager Oklahoma Resource Area RECORD OF DECISION on the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement September 1991 RECORD OF DECISION The decision is hereby made to approve the proposed decision as described in the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan/Final Env ironmental Impact Statement (RMP/FEIS July 1991), MANAGEMENT CONSZOERATXONS The decision to approve the Proposed Plan is based on: (1) the input received from the public, other Federal and state agencies; (2) the environmental analysis for the alternatives considered in the Draft RMP/Oraft EIS, as we11 as the Proposed Kansas RMP/FEIS. -
Estimation of Potential Runoff-Contributing Areas in Kansas Using Topographic and Soil Information
Prepared in cooperation with the KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Estimation of Potential Runoff-Contributing Areas in Kansas Using Topographic and Soil Information Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4242 EXPLANATION Potential contributing area Boundary of major river basin Hiii Infiltration-excess overland flow only ^H Saturation-excess overland flow only - Subbasin boundary Hi Infiltration- and saturation-excess overland flows L I Noncontributing area U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Estimation of Potential Runoff Contributing Areas in Kansas Using Topographic and Soil Information By KYLE E. JURACEK Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4242 Prepared in cooperation with the KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Lawrence, Kansas 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Building 810, Federal Center 4821 Quail Crest Place Box 25286 Lawrence, KS 66049-3839 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract...........................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................^ -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Register Listed National Park Service 1-20-2012 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Winfield National Bank Building other names/site number KHRI #035-5970-00010 2. Location street & number 901 Main Street not for publication city or town Winfield vicinity state Kansas code KS county Cowley code 035 zip code 67156 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide x local SEE FILE ____________________________________ Signature of certifying official Date _____________________________________ Title State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. -
Toxic Water Pollution in Kansas Table 9
E NVIRONMENTAL Dishonorable W G TM ORKING ROUP Table 9 Discharge Toxic water pollution in Kansas Companies reporting toxic discharges to water (1990-1994) City: Arkansas City, Kansas Facility: Total Petroleum Inc. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 24,281 27,083 18,100 19,280 17,509 106,253 AmmoniaWalnut River 24,000 27,000 18,000 19,200 17,361 105,561 PhenolWalnut River 250 6 30 71 357 Chromium Walnut River 60 70 80 210 Chromium compounds Walnut River 45 45 Nickel Walnut River 32 32 CyclohexaneWalnut River 10 4 14 Xylene (mixed isomers)Walnut River 5 5 10 1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneWalnut River 5 3 8 TolueneWalnut River 5 3 8 EthylbenzeneWalnut River 5 1 6 BenzeneWalnut River 1 1 2 City: Atchison, Kansas Facility: Midwest Grain Products Inc. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 250 255 255 255 5 1,020 Propylene oxideWhite Clay Creek 250 250 250 750 Propylene oxide White Clay Creek 250 250 Chlorine White Clay Creek 5 5 5 5 20 City: Augusta, Kansas Facility: Coastal Refining & Marketing Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 25 40 40 105 1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneWhite Water River 5 5 10 Ethylbenzene White Water River 5 5 10 Toluene White Water River 5 5 10 Cyclohexane White Water River 5 5 10 Xylene (mixed isomers)White Water River 5 5 10 Carbon tetrachloride White Water River 5 5 Carbon tetrachloride White River 5 5 Benzene White Water River 5 5 Benzene White Water 5 5 Cumene White Water River 5 5 Cumene White Water 5 5 Carbon tetrachlorideWhitewater River 5 5 Xylene (mixed isomers)Whitewater River 5 5 EthylbenzeneWhitewater River 5 5 BenzeneWhitewater River 5 5 TolueneWhitewater River 5 5 Source: Environmental Working Group. -
A Council Circle at Etzanoa? Multi-Sensor Drone Survey at an Ancestral Wichita Settlement in Southeastern Kansas
REPORTS A Council Circle at Etzanoa? Multi-sensor Drone Survey at an Ancestral Wichita Settlement in Southeastern Kansas Jesse Casana , Elise Jakoby Laugier, Austin Chad Hill, and Donald Blakeslee This article presents results of a multi-sensor drone survey at an ancestral Wichita archaeological site in southeastern Kansas, originally recorded in the 1930s and believed by some scholars to be the location of historical “Etzanoa,” a major settlement reportedly encountered by Spanish conquistador Juan de Oñate in 1601. We used high-resolution, drone-acquired thermal and multispectral (color and near-infrared) imagery, alongside publicly available lidar data and satellite imagery, to prospect for archaeological features across a relatively undisturbed 18 ha area of the site. Results reveal a feature that is best interpreted as the remains of a large, circular earthwork, similar to so-called council circles documented at five other contemporary sites of the Great Bend aspect cultural assemblage. We also located several features that may be remains of house basins, the size and configuration of which conform with historical evidence. These findings point to major investment in the construction of large- scale ritual, elite, or defensive structures, lending support to the interpretation of the cluster of Great Bend aspect sites in the lower Walnut River as a single, sprawling population center, as well as demonstrating the potential for thermal and multispec- tral surveys to reveal archaeological landscape features in the Great Plains and beyond. Keywords: remote sensing, thermography, UAV, Great Bend aspect, earthwork, ancestral Wichita Este artículo presenta los resultados de una encuesta de drones con sensores múltiples en un sitio arqueológico ancestral de Wichita en el sureste de Kansas, originalmente registrado en la década de 1930 y que muchos estudiosos creen que es la ubica- ción del histórico “Etzanoa”, un asentamiento importante que según los informes encontró el conquistador español Juan de Oñate en 1601. -
The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods
The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods ... Have We Forgotten? Introduction - This report was originally written as NWS Technical Attachment 81-11 in 1981, the thirtieth anniversary of this devastating flood. The co-authors of the original report were Robert Cox, Ernest Kary, Lee Larson, Billy Olsen, and Craig Warren, all hydrologists at the Missouri Basin River Forecast Center at that time. Although most of the original report remains accurate today, Robert Cox has updated portions of the report in light of occurrences over the past twenty years. Comparisons of the 1951 flood to the events of 1993 as well as many other parenthetic remarks are examples of these revisions. The Storms of 1951 - Fifty years ago, the stage was being set for one of the greatest natural disasters ever to hit the Midwest. May, June and July of 1951 saw record rainfalls over most of Kansas and Missouri, resulting in record flooding on the Kansas, Osage, Neosho, Verdigris and Missouri Rivers. Twenty-eight lives were lost and damage totaled nearly 1 billion dollars. (Please note that monetary damages mentioned in this report are in 1951 dollars, unless otherwise stated. 1951 dollars can be equated to 2001 dollars using a factor of 6.83. The total damage would be $6.4 billion today.) More than 150 communities were devastated by the floods including two state capitals, Topeka and Jefferson City, as well as both Kansas Cities. Most of Kansas and Missouri as well as large portions of Nebraska and Oklahoma had monthly precipitation totaling 200 percent of normal in May, 300 percent in June, and 400 percent in July of 1951. -
KANSAS CLIMATE UPDATE July 2019 Summary
KANSAS CLIMATE UPDATE July 2019 Summary Highlights July ended with a return to of abnormally dry conditions, mostly in the central part of the state where the largest precipitation deficits occurred. July flooding occurred at 31 USGS stream gages on at least 14 streams for one to as much as 31 days. USDA issued agricultural disaster declarations due to flooding since mid-March for three Kansas Counties on July 11. 2019. Producers in Atchison, Leavenworth and Wyandotte counties may be eligible for emergency loans. July 25, FEMA added Bourbon, Comanche, Crawford, Dickinson, Douglas, Edwards, Ford, Gray and Riley counties to those eligible for public assistance under DR-4449 on June 20th. The incident period for the Kansas Multi-Hazard Event is April 28-July 12, 2019. Federal presidential declarations remain in place for 33 counties. FEMA-3412-EM allows for federal assistance to supplement state and local efforts. July 31, 2019 U.S. Small Business Administration made an administrative declaration of disaster due to flooding June 22 –July 6, 2019 making loans available to those affected in Marion County and contiguous counties of Butler, Chase, Dickinson, Harvey, McPherson, Morris and Saline. 1 General Drought Conditions Kansas became drought free by the U.S. Drought Monitor in January 2019 but began to see dry conditions the last week in July. Changes in drought classification over the month for the High Plains area is also shown. Figure 1. U.S. Drought Monitor Maps of Drought status More information can be found on the U.S. Drought Monitor web site https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/ . -
Toxic Water Pollution in Oklahoma Table 9
E NVIRONMENTAL Dishonorable W G TM ORKING ROUP Table 9 Discharge Toxic water pollution in Oklahoma Companies reporting toxic discharges to water (1990-1994) City: Ardmore, Oklahoma Facility: Total Petroleum Inc. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 1,688 21,131 152,058 36,626 33,794 245,297 Diethanolamine Sand Creek 130,000 8,200 138,200 AmmoniaSand Creek 1,494 21,000 22,000 28,000 33,726 106,220 PhenolSand Creek 194 120 12 19 25 370 Cobalt compounds Sand Creek 360 360 Chlorine Sand Creek 11 46 57 Antimony compounds Sand Creek 47 47 Nickel Sand Creek 43 43 City: Ardmore, Oklahoma Facility: Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 250 250 250 750 Zinc compounds Hickory Creek 250 250 250 750 City: Broken Bow, Oklahoma Facility: Weyerhaeuser Co. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 250 250 FormaldehydeMt. Fork River 250 250 City: Catoosa, Oklahoma Facility: Terra Nitrogen Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 259,820 236,598 226,386 223,151 95,342 1,041,297 Ammonium nitrate (solution)Verdigris River 213,000 190,000 193,000 165,000 88,000 849,000 AmmoniaVerdigris River 45,000 45,000 32,000 57,000 6,200 185,200 MethanolVerdigris River 750 750 750 750 750 3,750 Copper compoundsVerdigris River 250 250 250 250 250 1,250 Zinc compoundsVerdigris River 320 98 136 151 142 847 Chromium compoundsVerdigris River 250 250 500 Nickel compoundsVerdigris River 250 250 500 Mixtures and other tradeVerdigris River 250 250 Source: Environmental Working Group. -
Water Supply Study
City of Augusta, Kansas Water Supply Study April 16, 2012 clean & pure - pure & simple Aqua Tech Engineering Consultants Augusta, Kansas 11-22-03-01 CITY OF AUGUSTA, KANSAS WATER SUPPLY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I………………………………………………………………………………... 1 A. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….…………. 1 B. PURPOSE...…………………………………………………………….……….. 1 PART II…………………………………………………………………….…………. 1 A. GENERAL………………………………………………………………………. 1 B. POPULATION TRENDS AND GROWTH AREAS…………………………… 1 PART III...……………………………………………………………………………. 1 A. GENERAL………………………………………………………………………. 1 B. SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT………………………………………………. 1 C. CURRENT WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS…………………………….. 2 D. KANSAS ANTIDEGRADATION POLICY……………………………………. 2 E. ARSENIC………………………………………………………………………... 4 F. RADIONUCLIDES……………………………………………………………… 5 G. SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE…………………………………….. 6 H. INTERIM ENHANCED SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE…………. 7 I. LONG TER 2 ENHANCED SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE………. 7 J. STAGE 1 DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS RULE... 9 K. STAGE 2 DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS RULE.. 11 L. KANSAS WATER APPROPRIATIONS ACT…………………………………. 13 PART IV……………………………………………………………………………… 1 A. RAW WATER SOURCES……...………………………………………………. 1 B. RAW WATER PIPELINES……………………………………………………... 5 C. CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM……………………………………. 9 D. AVAILABLE SUPPLY…………………………………………………………. 9 PART V………………………………………………………………………………. 1 A. GENERAL………………………………………………………………………. 1 B. EL DORADO LAKE AND PIPELINE…………………………………………. 2 C. AUGUSTA CITY LAKE………………………………………………………... 7 D. SANTA FE -
General Fishing Atlas Information
ATLAS COVER Pages FISH 2021.qxp_ATLAS COVER Pages FISH 2/17/21 10:42 AM Page 1 Kansas Fishing Atlas 2021 Public Fishing Access Includes Walk-in Fishing Access (WIFA) Get our mobile app HuntFish KS ATLAS COVER Pages FISH 2021.qxp_ATLAS COVER Pages FISH 2/17/21 10:42 AM Page 2 WIFA Area Rules Walk-in Fishing Access (WIFA), formerly F.I.S.H., sites 6. Avoid stretching fences when crossing them, and use are leased from private landowners and are typically open to fence stiles where available. public fishing from March 1 – Oct. 31, though some proper- ties are open year-round. The WIFA program provides 7. Do not attempt to contact cooperating landowners to ask anglers increased opportunities to enjoy fishing on the state’s about fishing other portions of their land. streams and small impoundments, all that is required is a state fishing license. Funding for the program is provided Regulations governing WIFA area use: through fishing license revenues and Sport Fish Restoration Funds. Please observe all rules and regulations, and remem- • Impounded WIFA waters have a creel limit of two channel ber that common sense and ethical behavior will influence catfish, a creel limit of two largemouth bass, and an 18-inch the future of the program. minimum length limit on largemouth bass. Otherwise, all Kansas fishing regulations and statewide creel limits apply. It’s The following guidelines help maintain a good relation- especially important for anglers using the sites to respect and fol- ship between landowners and anglers: low the rules that apply on WIFA properties.