Pastsearch Newsletter Issue 75: March 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Southampton Canal Society Newsletter
Southampton Canal Society December 2017 Newsletter Issue 539 In this issue: Chairman’s Column 1 Chairman’s Column Editor’s Musings 1 December 7th Meeting dot hae to e shoig othe pitues duig the evening to enter. Just one picture only and to Tonight, we welcome you all to the Annual Inter- The Andover Canal 1 do with the waterways. Society Waterways Quiz. As before we hope to accommodate any format to Waterways Events 2 As last year winners, IWA Salisbury have organised include slides and photographs November Meeting 3 the quiz, with a completely different approach. Myra Glover will be MC and Quiz Master. She will SCS New Year Luncheon New Year Luncheon Menu 3 be assisted by Eric Lewis and Colin Davies. Sue This will be on Saturday 13th January 2018 at Keats Society in the News 3 Lewis will be scorer, Ron Glover the judge and as Restaurant, Winchester Road, Ampfield, SO51 technical producer Dave Thomas. Subscriptions for 2017 - 2018 3 9BQ. Toights teas ilude IWA Guildfod & ‘eadig, Memories - Old and New 4 This year the cost is £25 per person. At the IWA Salisbury, Southampton Canal Society and a meeting this evening (December), Angela Rose has EA boat fees to rise in 2018 5 team from the Basingstoke Canal Society. the Booking List and Menu Choices. No rush the IWA reaction 5 As is now traditional, thank you all for bringing Final menu choices do not have to be in until after along a variety of food to share, this finishes off our January Meeting. A copy of the menu can be Middle Level Bill to Proceed 5 the evening very well. -
Downloaded From
ISSN 2043-0663 Hampshire Industrial Archaeology Society Journal No. 25 (2017) www.hias.org.uk from Downloaded www.hias.org.uk from Front cover picture: The West side of Pier Street, Lee-on-the-Solent in 2017. The jewel in the crown is undoubtedly the building pictured on the corner with Marine Parade. (Howard Sprenger) [see page 17] Back cover pictures: Top: HDML 1387, one of only a few survivors and the only HDML restored to her former appearance. (© Stephen Fisher) [see page 6] Middle: The millpond and weir remaining from the Silk Mill at Overton. (Richard Waldram) [see page 19] Downloaded Bottom: A silver pouncet-box or vinaigrette. (Tony Yoward) [see page 25] 1 Hampshire Industrial Archaeology Society (formerly Southampton University Industrial Archaeology Group) Journal No. 25, 2017 _________________________________________________________________ Contents Editorial ………………………..……………………………………………………………..1 The Contributors and Acknowledgements……………………………………………………2 Second World War Coastal Forces of the Royal Navy in Hampshire Stephen Fisher ………………………………………………………………….……3 Lee-on-the-Solent – The Building of a Resort Howard Sprenger .……..…………………………………………..………...……..11 Overton Silk Mill, 1769-1848 Richard Waldram ……………………………………………….…………...…….19 A Note on Snuff Tony Yoward ………….……………………………………………………..……. 25 Editorial With Issue 25 of our Journal we reach our quarter-century; Issue 1 was published in 1992. The early issues are now available online to download via the HIAS website ( www.hias.org.uk ). In our first article, Stephen Fisher looks at the history of the small wooden motor boats which played a vital role in the Second World War. Several were designed, and manywww.hias.org.uk were built, around the Solent and the South Coast. Howard Sprenger takes us through the history of one family’s attempts to create a holiday resort at Lee- on-the-Solent. -
Itchen Navigation Heritage Trail, Hampshire
ITCHEN NAVIGATION HERITAGE TRAIL HAMPSHIRE Heritage Report for a Conservation Management Plan Prepared for: Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Beechcroft House Vicarage Lane Curdridge Hampshire GU32 2DP By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park Salisbury Wiltshire SP4 6EB Reference: 58850.02 April 2005 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2005 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 ITCHEN NAVIGATION HERITAGE TRAIL HAMPSHIRE Heritage Report for a Conservation Management Plan CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background..........................................................................................1 1.2 Aims of the Conservation and Management Plan .........................................2 1.3 Methods..............................................................................................................2 2 UNDERSTANDING............................................................................................5 2.1 Location .............................................................................................................5 2.2 Archaeological and Historical Background ...................................................5 Palaeolithic (c. 500,000-10,000BC) ...............................................................................5 Mesolithic (c. 10,000-4,000BC) .....................................................................................5 Neolithic (c. -
Speed on Canals.” by FEANCISROUBILIAC CONDER, M
160 ADXISSIONS AND ELECTIONS. [Minutes of Associafe IlIe1r~71err. HORACEALLEN, Stud. Inst.C.E. GEOXGEDALLAS MARSTOX, Stud. Inst. JAMES ATEINSON. C.E. ARTHUR BARCLAY. CHARLESEDWARD MASTERMAN. CHARLESWILLIADX BARNETT. JOHXNETHVEN. FELICIANOMENDES DE MESQUITA \vILLIAM BURTON8bVILLE IIILLS, BARROS. Stud. Inst. C.E. WILLIAM BASHALL, Jun., Stud.Inst. WILLIAU PCRCELLOWEILL, Stud. C.E. Inst. C.E. PERCYBENHAB~, Stud. Inst.C.E. CAHILOGUILLERXO PARDO,Stud. EDWARDROBERT BIRCH, B.A., B.E., Inst. C.E. Stud. Inst. C.E. CHARLES DONALD NAPIERPAREEL HARRYBIRD. HENRYPARKES, Stud. Inst. C.E. WILLIAMNISBET BLAIR, Stud. Inst. WILLIAM MORROPEARSE. C.E. CHARLESBERKELEY PENLINGTOB, CARL RODERIQUELOUIS MENNI BONN. Stud. Inst. C.E. THOXASSMITH BRIGHT,Stud. Inst. WILLIADIFRANK PETTIGREW, Stud. C.E. Inst. C.E. CHARLESEDWIX BROWN. WILLIAXHEXRY RADFORD. WILLIAMHENRY BURR. WILLIAXREID. JAMESBUTLER. PETERROBERTS. ALBERTHAVELOCK CASE. HENRY GEORGEARCHIBALD ROUSE. ALFRED CREER. HEXRYROYLE. FITZHERBERT RUXTOXDESPARD. ROBERT ALLENWILLIAM SNINNERTON. HEXRYFRANCIS DOREY, Stud. Inst. ALBERTHARRISON TURNER. C.E. PERCYJOHN WATES. QEORGEHOLLAND ERSKINE, Stud. Inst. THOMASDUNClN WEIR, Stud.Inst. C.E. C.E. HARRYF~ANCIS. I~AU~IICEFITZGER.4LD WILSON, Stud. JAMESFRENCH. Inst. C.E. ROBERTMACNISH GALE. JOHN i%CKWORTH WOOD. RICHARDHACK. FREDERICKADLARD WRIGHT, Stud. GEORGE HOWARDHARBISON. Inst. C.E. LLOYDHASSELL, Stud. Inst. C.E. ROBERTW.4DE WRIGHT, Stud. Inst. PERDINANDHUDLESTON. C.E. WILLIAMOWEN LGCAS. Associate. WILLIAVWAKEFORD. ‘‘ Speed on Canals.” BY FEANCISROUBILIAC CONDER, M. INST.C.E. THEamount of resistance tothe propulsion of vessels through narrowchannels, due to the size, the form, andthe surface of the channel,has not hitherto been fully studied. Thatthis Downloaded by [ University of Liverpool] on [15/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved. PLATE 1 e% 120'.0" X 20'.0' FORT H AND C LVD E. -
138 CHAPTER 5 the PARRETT NAVIGATION BEFORE 1830 When
CHAPTER 5 THE PARRETT NAVIGATION BEFORE 1830 When the preliminary programme of research for this study was drawn up the present writer was aware that William Gravatt had been Engineer to the Parrett Navigation Company while he was also acting as Brunel's assistant on the B&ER. 1 It was reasonable to assume that Brunel's presence in Somerset in late 1835, in connection with the B&ER, would have had some bearing on Gravatt's engagement on the PNC, and possibly that Brunel himself might have played a part in the design of the works that were subsequently carried out under Gravatt. It also seemed likely that earlier navigation projects and proposals would have significantly influenced the inception of the PNC and the development of its plans. The aim of this chapter therefore is to trace the history of proposals for improving the navigability of the Parrett above Bridgwater, and of its major tributaries, up to 1830; the developments that culminated in the incorporation of the PNC are examined in Chapter 6, and the subsequent construction of the improvement works is described in Chapter 7. The surviving records of the former Somerset River Authority, its forerunners, and associated concerns such as the PNC, constitute a remarkably large corpus but regrettably they are inconsistent in coverage so that in many areas there is a dearth or even complete absence of relevant evidence. In order to piece together a chronology it has been necessary to rely heavily on chance references that have survived elsewhere, and consequently there is always the possibility that fruitless proposals that would otherwise have had a major impact on the navigation have been missed. -
Hampshire in 1994
dnoiC teulsnpul ,(lr$a^run uoldueqlnos ^ooloaeqcrv[OoloaeqcLy ;eulsnpul Jol uortepossv pemol fueyr; p {uol palsrsse ^q Aa[g leg Aq paltp3 ldli ! f UIHSdYUVH JO ACOIOfVHSUV IVIU]SNCNI eql ol eplnc uoqs v This booklet is published for the ASSOCIATION for INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY Annual Conference held al Sparsholt, Hampshire in 1994. The AIA was established in 1973 to promote the study of lndustrial Archaeology and encourage improved standards of recording, research, conservation and publication. lt aims to support individuals and groups involved in the study and recording of past industrial activity and the preservation of industrial monuments, to represent the interests of lndustrial Archaeology at national level, to hold conferences and seminars, and to publish the results of research. lt publishes the lndustrial Archaeolow Reviewwhich is sent twice yearly to all members who also receive the rndustrr'a l Archaeology NEWS. Further details may be obtained from the Membership Secretary, the AlA, The Wharfage, lronbridge, Tetford, Shropshire, TF8.7AW. SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP SUIAG was formed in '1968 to hold meetings and record sites of lndustrial Archaeological interest and remains in Hampshire and the lsle of Wight. Meetings are held monthly at the University, residential visits are organised in the summer and a newsletter is sent to members twice a year. Associated groups arc lhe Tram 57 Prcjecl,lhe Twyfotd Watetworks lrust, the Hampshirc Mills Group and the Sorent Sream Pacf,e, Ltd (SS Shiedhall Poect) all of which are very active in their own fields. The group is actively engaged in the recording and conservation of lA sites in the county. -
Canal Contractors 1760-1820
Canal Contractors 1760-1820 Peter Cross-Rudkin The period 1760-1820 saw great changes in the Kennet & Avon Canal 1794-1810 £860,000 nature of civil engineering construction. Political Caledonian Canal 1803-23 £855,000 stability and technical development during the previous 70 years had brought economic progress Regent’s Canal 1812-20 £700,000 and an increasing number of civil engineering projects, Edinburgh & Glasgow Union Canal 1817-22 £460,000 though these latter were usually relatively small and their organisation fairly simple. Only Westminster From this it can be seen that canal construction Bridge (1738-50) exceeded £100,000 in value. formed a significant part of civil engineering During 1760-90 there was a dramatic increase in the expenditure during 1760-1820. number of schemes. Six-figure works included a number of canals: If asked ‘Who built our canals?’, people might answer ‘the Duke of Bridgewater’, or ‘James Brindley’ or ‘William Jessop’, or ‘the navvies’. Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal 1766-72 £100,000 Probably few people would reply ‘contractors’ and Trent & Mersey Canal 1766-77 £300,000 even fewer would volunteer the name of one of them. Defining a contractor as the person or partnership Birmingham Canal original line 1768-72 £112,000 (in 1760-1820 limited companies could only be set Forth & Clyde Canal phase 1 1768-77 £164,000 up by Act of Parliament) who entered into a contract Oxford Canal phase 1 1769-78 £200,000 with a canal company for some part of construction Leeds & Liverpool Canal phase 1, 1770-77, £230,000 -
SOUTHAMPTON CANAL TUNNEL by EDWIN COURSE
SOUTHAMPTON CANAL TUNNEL By EDWIN COURSE ALTHOUGH canals are associated with the and the other running to the River Itchen at Midlands rather than the South of England, Northam. by the beginning of the nineteenth century, At a well attended meeting held at the Star Hampshire possessed an appreciable mileage in Southampton, 89 people agreed to invest in of inland navigable waterways. The first of the canal, the largest groups being from these, the Itchen, had been used for many Southampton and from Bristol. The Bristol years, but the engineering works which effec interest was based on plans for waterways tually converted it from the River Itchen to linking Salisbury and Bristol. The initial the Itchen Navigation were completed be reaction from Salisbury was lukewarm but tween Woodmill and Winchester about 1710. subsequently its citizens became more in Partly because of its importance to millers, terested and Committees were formed in and partly for ease of water management, the Southampton, Bristol and Salisbury (Welch corresponding route following the Test con 1966). A survey to determine the line of the sisted of a new cut - a canal as opposed to a canal was carried out by Joseph Hill of Rom- navigation'. The Andover Canal was author sey, and Thomas Ridding was appointed ized in 1789 following the River Anton from secretary. He was a Southampton solicitor, Andover down to Fullerton, and the Test and also the town clerk. Joseph Hill produced down to Redbridge (29 Geo. Ill, c.72). It was detailed estimates for the provision of a water opened throughout in 1794 and settled down way 15 ft. -
Test & Itchen River Restoration Strategy Technical Report
Test & Itchen River Restoration Strategy Technical Report Environment Agency 05th April 2013 Test and Itchen River Restoration Technical report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for the Environment Agency’s information and use in relation to the Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy. Atkins Ltd assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 104 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5115317 Document ref: Technical report Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Draft report structure for CA, KS, JD, SM SM KS 21/12/1 EA/NE review BM 2 Rev 2.0 Draft report structure for CA, KS, JD, LD KS 19/03/1 Public consultation BM 3 Rev 3.0 Draft final report CA, KS JD SM KS 22/03/1 3 Rev 4.0 Final report KS KS 05/04/1 3 Client signoff Client Environment Agency Project Test & Itchen River Restoration Strategy Document title Technical Restoration Report Job no. 5115317 Copy no. Document reference 2 Test and Itchen River Restoration Technical report Table of contents Chapter Pages Glossary 7 Executive summary 8 1. Introduction 11 1.1. Background to the SSSI 11 1.2. Rationale for restoration for the Test and Itchen SSSI 11 1.3. Project aim and objectives 13 1.4. Aims and objectives of the technical report 13 2. Methodology 14 2.1. Overview of method 14 2.2. Study area 14 2.3. -
CB Clke 97 * VILE, NIGEL. Pub Walks Along the Kennet & Avon Canal
RCHS BIBILIOGRAPHY PROJECT BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PERIODICAL LITERATURE OF INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORT HISTORY Updated 27.10.18. Please send additions/corrections/comments to Grahame Boyes, [email protected]. This bibliography is arranged by class, as defined in the following table. It can be searched by calling up the FIND function (Control + F) and then entering the class or a keyword/phrase. Note that, to aid searching, some entries have also been given a subsidiary classification at the end. CLASSIFICATION SCHEME CA GENERAL HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORT IN THE BRITISH ISLES CB INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORT AT PARTICULAR PERIODS CB1 Antiquity and early use of inland navigation up to c.1600 (arranged by region of the British Isles) CB1z Boats CB2 c.1600–1750 The age of river improvement schemes CB3 c.1750–1850 The Canal Age CB4 c.1850–1947 The period of decline CB5 1948– Nationalisation and after; the rebirth of canals as leisure amenities CC INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORT IN PARTICULAR REGIONS OF THE BRITISH ISLES CC1a England—Southern England CC1b England—South West region CC1c England—South East region CC1cl London CC1d England—West Midlands region CC1e England—East Midlands region CC1f England—East Anglia CC1fq England—East Anglia: guides CC1g England—Northern England CC1h England—North West region CC1i England—Yorkshire and North Humberside region CC1j England—North region CC2 Scotland CC3 Wales CC4 Ireland CC4L Ireland: individual canals and navigations CC4Lbal Ballinamore & Ballyconnel Canal and Shannon–Erne Waterway CC4Lban Lower and Upper Bann Navigations and Lough Neagh CC4Lbar Barrow Navigation CC4Lboy Boyne Navigation CC4Lcor Corrib Navigation, including the Eglinton Canal and Cong Canal CC4Ldub Dublin & Kingstown Ship Canal (proposed) CC4Lern Erne Navigation CC4Lgra Grand Canal, including the County of Kildare Canal CC4Llag Lagan Navigation CC4Llif R. -
The Leeds & Liverpool Canal Historical Information
The Leeds & Liverpool Canal Historical Information Construction and Maintainance 1 The cost of building the canal The details below were set out by the Leeds & Liverpool Canal Company to show investors how much the construction of one mile of canal would cost. They have not included the cost of building locks. It was more difficult to give an average price for a lock as this would depend upon the type of foundation work needed and the accessibility of stone or bricks for the lock walls. All materials had to be brought by horse drawn wagons along the poor 18th century roads. It was to simplify the transport of heavy goods, such as stone or coal, that canals were being built. Estimate of the expense of making one mile of canal 42 feet wide at top, 27 feet at bottom, and 5 feet water. Common cutting - 24 yards @ per yard running 5d. …………………… 880 - 0 - 0 Puddling - 2 yards @ per yard running 6d. ……………………………… 88 - 0 - 0 4 bridges per mile @ £400 each …………………………………… 1600 - 0 - 0 Stop gates and flash weirs …………………………………………… 100 - 0 - 0 Fencing and gates …………………………………………………… 100 - 0 - 0 Towing path @ per rood 6/- …………………………………………… 78 - 0 - 0 Stubbing fences and trees …………………………………………… 44 - 0 - 0 4 culverts per mile @ £60 each ……………………………………… 240 - 0 - 0 Forming and soiling banks …………………………………………… 44 - 0 - 0 Let off trunks ……………………………………………………… 15 - 0 - 0 Rampart roads to bridges, backing etc. ………………………………… 400 - 0 - 0 Quarries, cranes and barrows ………………………………………… 150 - 0 - 0 Facing banks with stone ……………………………………………… 50 - 0 - 0 Land, eight acres @ per acre £80 ……………………………………… 640 - 0 - 0 Temporary damages, five years ………………………………………… 160 - 0 - 0 _______________ Total ……………………………………………………………… 4589 - 0 - 0 and 10 per cent thereon ……………………………………………… 459 - 0 - 0 _______________ Exclusive of locks ………………………………………………… £5048 - 0 - 0 As is the case today, the cost was often underestimated. -
The Itchen Navigation Fits Into This Pattern, Being Authorised by an Act of Parliament of 1665 and Carrying Its Last Barge, Loaded with Coal, up to Winchester in 1869
THE ITGHEN NAVIGATION By EDWIN COURSE THE development of land transport by road and rail has taken most of the traffic from the inland waterways of Britain. In the past they provided the easiest means of moving heavy and bulky goods such as coal or timber, but the combined competition of coastal steamers, railways and mechanised road transport has taken much of their traffic and left many miles of abandoned routes. There were two main types of inland waterway - the navigations, which were improved rivers, and the canals, which were artificial cuts, sometimes crossing water sheds with the aid of locks and other engineering works. Many navigations were com pleted in the late 17th and early 18th centuries and many canals, in the latter half of the 18th and the first decades of the 19th century. Because of their special suitability for heavy freight, they were more important and more successful in the new industrial regions than in the south of England. Many of the navigations and canals of the south were in financial difficulties before the coming of the railways; few survived to carry commercial traffic for long after their opening. The Itchen Navigation fits into this pattern, being authorised by an Act of Parliament of 1665 and carrying its last barge, loaded with coal, up to Winchester in 1869. Although the Act of 1665 gives no indica tion, it is probable that some use was made of the Itchen for transport purposes in earlier times. But the relics which have survived over the iof miles from Woodmill, near Southampton, to Blackbridge Wharf at Winchester almost certainly belong to the period 1666 to 1869, with which this account is concerned.