Electromagnetic Duality for Children

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electromagnetic Duality for Children Electromagnetic Duality for Children JM Figueroa-O'Farrill [email protected] Version of 8 October 1998 Contents I The Simplest Example: SO(3) 11 1 Classical Electromagnetic Duality 12 1.1 The Dirac Monopole ....................... 12 1.1.1 And in the beginning there was Maxwell... 12 1.1.2 The Dirac quantisation condition . 14 1.1.3 Dyons and the Zwanziger{Schwinger quantisation con- dition ........................... 16 1.2 The 't Hooft{Polyakov Monopole . 18 1.2.1 The bosonic part of the Georgi{Glashow model . 18 1.2.2 Finite-energy solutions: the 't Hooft{Polyakov Ansatz . 20 1.2.3 The topological origin of the magnetic charge . 24 1.3 BPS-monopoles .......................... 26 1.3.1 Estimating the mass of a monopole: the Bogomol'nyi bound ........................... 27 1.3.2 Saturating the bound: the BPS-monopole . 28 1.4 Duality conjectures ........................ 30 1.4.1 The Montonen{Olive conjecture . 30 1.4.2 The Witten e®ect ..................... 31 1.4.3 SL(2; Z) duality ...................... 33 2 Supersymmetry 39 2.1 The super-Poincar¶ealgebra in four dimensions . 40 2.1.1 Some notational remarks about spinors . 40 2.1.2 The Coleman{Mandula and Haag{ÃLopusza¶nski{Sohnius theorems .......................... 42 2.2 Unitary representations of the supersymmetry algebra . 44 2.2.1 Wigner's method and the little group . 44 2.2.2 Massless representations . 45 2.2.3 Massive representations . 47 No central charges .................... 48 Adding central charges . 49 1 [email protected] draft version of 8/10/1998 2.3 N=2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills . 51 2.3.1 N=1 d=6 supersymmetric Yang{Mills . 52 2.3.2 From N=1 in d=6 to N=2 in d=4 . 57 2.3.3 Higgsed N=2 supersymmetric Yang{Mills . 59 2.3.4 N=2 avatar of the BPS-monopole . 60 2.3.5 The supersymmetry bound is the Bogomol'nyi bound . 62 The supersymmetry algebra in six dimensions . 63 The supersymmetry algebra in four dimensions . 64 2.4 N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills . 66 2.4.1 N=1 d=10 supersymmetric Yang{Mills . 67 2.4.2 Reduction to d=4: N=4 supersymmetric Yang{Mills . 69 2.4.3 Monopoles and gauge bosons in N=4 supersymmetric Yang{Mills ........................ 74 2.4.4 The mass bound for N=4 super Yang{Mills . 76 The supersymmetry algebra in ten dimensions . 77 The supersymmetry algebra in four dimensions . 78 3 Collective Coordinates 80 3.1 The metric on the moduli space . 81 3.1.1 The physical con¯guration space . 81 3.1.2 The metric on the physical con¯guration space . 82 3.1.3 The metric on the moduli space . 84 3.1.4 The 1-monopole moduli space . 85 3.1.5 The quantisation of the e®ective action . 87 3.1.6 Some general properties of the monopole moduli space 88 3.2 dim Mk = 4k ........................... 89 3.2.1 The dimension as an index . 90 3.2.2 Computing the index of D . 92 3.2.3 Computing the current Ji(x; x) . 96 3.3 A quick motivation of hyperkÄahlergeometry . 99 3.3.1 Riemannian geometry . 100 3.3.2 KÄahlergeometry . 103 3.3.3 Ricci flatness . 107 3.3.4 HyperkÄahlergeometry . 109 3.4 Mk is hyperkÄahler . 111 3.4.1 Symplectic quotients . 111 3.4.2 KÄahlerquotients . 113 3.4.3 HyperkÄahlerquotients . 116 3.4.4 Mk as a hyperkÄahlerquotient . 116 3.4.5 Another proof that Mk is hyperkÄahler . 119 2 [email protected] draft version of 8/10/1998 4 The E®ective Action for N=2 Supersymmetric Yang{Mills 122 4.1 Fermionic collective coordinates . 123 4.1.1 Computing the index . 124 4.1.2 Using supersymmetry . 125 4.2 The e®ective action . 127 4.3 N=4 supersymmetry of the e®ective action . 130 4.3.1 N=4 supersymmetry in R4: a toy model . 131 4.3.2 N=4 supersymmetry in hyperkÄahlermanifolds . 132 4.3.3 N=4 supersymmetry of Le® . 134 4.4 A brief review of harmonic theory . 136 4.4.1 Harmonic theory for riemannian manifolds . 136 4.4.2 Harmonic theory for KÄahlermanifolds . 139 4.4.3 Explicit formulas for @¹ and @¹¤ . 142 4.5 Quantisation of the e®ective action . 144 4.5.1 Canonical analysis . 144 4.5.2 The quantisation of the e®ective hamiltonian . 146 5 The E®ective Action for N=4 Supersymmetric Yang{Mills 149 5.1 Fermionic collective coordinates . 150 II Arbitrary Gauge Groups 153 6 Monopoles for Arbitrary Gauge Groups 154 6.1 Topologically stable solutions . 154 6.1.1 Some elements of homotopy . 156 The fundamental group . 157 Higher homotopy groups . 162 6.1.2 Homotopy classi¯cation of ¯nite-energy con¯gurations . 166 Adding topological charges . 171 6.2 The Dirac quantisation condition . 174 6.3 Some facts about compact Lie groups and Lie algebras . 177 6.3.1 Compact Lie groups . 177 6.3.2 The Weyl group . 180 6.3.3 Root systems and simple Lie algebras . 182 Reconstructing the group . 184 The centre of G~ . 186 An example: A3 = D3 . 188 Another example: D4 . 189 All the connected compact simple Lie groups . 190 6.3.4 Some simple examples . 192 3 [email protected] draft version of 8/10/1998 The simple root system A2 . 192 The simple root systems B2 = C2 . 194 The simple root system G2 . 195 6.4 The magnetic dual of a compact Lie group . 195 6.4.1 Some lattices and dual groups . 197 H abelian . 198 H simple . 198 An example: Spin(8) and its quotients . 200 Another example: Spin(12) and its quotients . 202 4 List of Exercises 1.1 Angular momentum due to the electromagnetic ¯eld . 17 1.2 The Zwanziger{Schwinger quantisation condition . 17 1.3 Dyonic spectrum in CP non-violating theories . 17 1.4 The spectrum of the model .................... 19 1.5 Boundary conditions on H and K . 22 1.6 The equations of motion for H and K . 22 1.7 Asymptotic form of the electromagnetic ¯eld . 23 1.8 Gauge ¯eld-strength in the Higgs vacuum . 25 1.9 Additivity of the magnetic charge g§ . 26 1.10 Dirac quantisation condition revisited . 26 1.11 The Bogomol'nyi equation implies (1.10) . 29 1.12 The BPS-monopole ........................ 29 1.13 The mass density at the origin is ¯nite . 29 1.14 (P )SL(2; Z) and its action on the upper half-plane . 34 1.15 SL(2; Z)-invariance of the mass formula . 35 1.16 Orbifold points in the fundamental domain D . 36 1.17 Properties of the mass matrix A(¿) . 37 2.1 The little groups for positive-energy particles . 45 2.2 Helicity content of massless multiplets . 46 2.3 Highest spin in the multiplet ................... 48 2.4 Massive N=2 multiplets with s=0 and s=1=2 . 48 2.5 Short N=2 multiplets with s=0 and s=1=2 . 50 2.6 Short N=4 multiplets with s=0 . 51 2.7 N=1 supersymmetric Yang{Mills . 52 2.8 Supersymmetry variation of L . 54 2.9 A Fierz rearrangement ...................... 55 2.10 Some ¡-matrix identities ..................... 56 2.11 ... and the proof of supersymmetry invariance . 56 2.12 The supersymmetry multiplet . 56 2.13 L in a Majorana basis ...................... 57 5 [email protected] draft version of 8/10/1998 2.14 Explicit N=2 supersymmetry transformations . 58 2.15 The SO(2) Noether current ................... 59 2.16 The perturbative spectrum of the model . 59 2.17 Supersymmetric BPS-monopoles . 61 2.18 More γ-matrix identities ..................... 61 2.19 Some euclidean γ-matrices .................... 61 2.20 BPS-monopoles break one half of the supersymmetry . 62 2.21 Supersymmetric variation of the supercurrent . 63 2.22 The symmetric gauge-invariant energy momentum tensor . 64 2.23 The topological current ...................... 64 2.24 The \momenta" in the extra dimensions . 64 2.25 The e®ective electromagnetic ¯eld strength . 65 2.26 The space components of the topological charge . 66 2.27 The Majorana condition ..................... 67 2.28 Properties of Majorana and Weyl fermions . 68 2.29 Varying the lagrangian density . 68 2.30 A ten-dimensional Fierz identity . 69 2.31 Some more ¡-matrix identities . 69 2.32 so(4) »= so(3) £ so(3) explicitly . 70 2.33 Explicit realisation for ®I and ¯J . 71 2.34 The fundamental representation of su(4) . 71 2.35 The fermionic terms in the lagrangian . 73 2.36 N=4 supersymmetry transformations . 73 2.37 su(4) invariance .......................... 73 2.38 The perturbative spectrum after higgsing . 75 2.39 The supersymmetry algebra in ten dimensions . 77 2.40 Another topological current ................... 78 2.41 A self-dual 5-form ......................... 78 2.42 Momentum and topological charge in this background . 79 3.1 The BPS-monopole as an instanton . 82 3.2 D2 has no normalisable zero modes . 85 3.3 The electric charge ........................ 87 3.4 Two equations in one ....................... 90 3.5 Dy has no normalisable zero modes . 91 3.6 A formula for the index of D ................... 92 3.7 Another formula for I(M 2) .................... 92 3.8 Some properties of kernels .................... 93 3.9 Regularity properties of the propagator . 94 3.10 The ¯rst term doesn't contribute . 97 3.11 Another expression for the degree of the map Á . 99 6 [email protected] draft version of 8/10/1998 3.12 A coordinate-free expression for r .
Recommended publications
  • Topological Modes in Dual Lattice Models
    Topological Modes in Dual Lattice Models Mark Rakowski 1 Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 10 Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland Abstract Lattice gauge theory with gauge group ZP is reconsidered in four dimensions on a simplicial complex K. One finds that the dual theory, formulated on the dual block complex Kˆ , contains topological modes 2 which are in correspondence with the cohomology group H (K,Zˆ P ), in addition to the usual dynamical link variables. This is a general phenomenon in all models with single plaquette based actions; the action of the dual theory becomes twisted with a field representing the above cohomology class. A similar observation is made about the dual version of the three dimensional Ising model. The importance of distinct topological sectors is confirmed numerically in the two di- 1 mensional Ising model where they are parameterized by H (K,Zˆ 2). arXiv:hep-th/9410137v1 19 Oct 1994 PACS numbers: 11.15.Ha, 05.50.+q October 1994 DIAS Preprint 94-32 1Email: [email protected] 1 Introduction The use of duality transformations in statistical systems has a long history, beginning with applications to the two dimensional Ising model [1]. Here one finds that the high and low temperature properties of the theory are related. This transformation has been extended to many other discrete models and is particularly useful when the symmetries involved are abelian; see [2] for an extensive review. All these studies have been confined to hypercubic lattices, or other regular structures, and these have rather limited global topological features. Since lattice models are defined in a way which depends clearly on the connectivity of links or other regions, one expects some sort of topological effects generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Band Spectrum Is D-Brane
    Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 013B04 (26 pages) DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptv181 Band spectrum is D-brane Koji Hashimoto1,∗ and Taro Kimura2,∗ 1Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan 2Department of Physics, Keio University, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan ∗E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received October 19, 2015; Revised November 13, 2015; Accepted November 29, 2015; Published January 24 , 2016 Downloaded from ............................................................................... We show that band spectrum of topological insulators can be identified as the shape of D-branes in string theory. The identification is based on a relation between the Berry connection associated with the band structure and the Atiyah–Drinfeld–Hitchin–Manin/Nahm construction of solitons http://ptep.oxfordjournals.org/ whose geometric realization is available with D-branes. We also show that chiral and helical edge states are identified as D-branes representing a noncommutative monopole. ............................................................................... Subject Index B23, B35 1. Introduction at CERN - European Organization for Nuclear Research on July 8, 2016 Topological insulators and superconductors are one of the most interesting materials in which theo- retical and experimental progress have been intertwined each other. In particular, the classification of topological phases [1,2] provided concrete and rigorous argument on stability and the possibility of topological insulators and superconductors. The key to finding the topological materials is their electron band structure. The existence of gapless edge states appearing at spatial boundaries of the material signals the topological property. Identification of possible electron band structures is directly related to the topological nature of topological insulators. It is important, among many possible appli- cations of topological insulators, to gain insight into what kind of electron band structure is possible for topological insulators with fixed topological charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Duality, Quaternion and Supersymmetric Gauge
    Electromagnetic Duality, Quaternion and Supersymmetric Gauge Theories of Dyons H. Dehnen and O. P. S. Negi∗ 2nd July 2021 Universitt Konstanz Fachbereich Physik Postfach M 677 D-78457 Konstanz,Germany Email:[email protected] ops [email protected] Abstract Starting with the generalized potentials, currents, field tensors and elec- tromagnetic vector fields of dyons as the complex complex quantities with real and imaginary counter parts as electric and magnetic constituents, we have established the electromagnetic duality for various fields and equations of motion associated with dyons in consistent way. It has been shown that the manifestly covariant forms of generalized field equations and equation of motion of dyons are invariant under duality transformations. Quaternionic formulation for generalized fields of dyons are developed and corresponding field equations are derived in compact and simpler manner. Supersymmetric gauge theories are accordingly reviewed to discuss the behaviour of duali- ties associated with BPS mass formula of dyons in terms of supersymmetric charges. Consequently, the higher dimensional supersymmetric gauge the- ories for N=2 and N=4 supersymmetries are analysed over the fields of arXiv:hep-th/0608164v1 23 Aug 2006 complex and quaternions respectively. 1 Introduction The asymmetry between electricity and magnetism became very clear at the end of 19th century with the formulation of Maxwell’s equations. Magnetic monopoles were advocated [1] to symmetrize these equations in a manifest way that the mere existence of an isolated magnetic charge implies the quantization of electric charge and accordingly the considerable literature [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] has come in force.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory
    Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory a b L. Álvarez-Gaumé ∗ and M.A. Vázquez-Mozo † a CERN, Geneva, Switzerland b Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Abstract In these lectures we present a few topics in quantum field theory in detail. Some of them are conceptual and some more practical. They have been se- lected because they appear frequently in current applications to particle physics and string theory. 1 Introduction These notes are based on lectures delivered by L.A.-G. at the 3rd CERN–Latin-American School of High- Energy Physics, Malargüe, Argentina, 27 February–12 March 2005, at the 5th CERN–Latin-American School of High-Energy Physics, Medellín, Colombia, 15–28 March 2009, and at the 6th CERN–Latin- American School of High-Energy Physics, Natal, Brazil, 23 March–5 April 2011. The audience on all three occasions was composed to a large extent of students in experimental high-energy physics with an important minority of theorists. In nearly ten hours it is quite difficult to give a reasonable introduction to a subject as vast as quantum field theory. For this reason the lectures were intended to provide a review of those parts of the subject to be used later by other lecturers. Although a cursory acquaintance with the subject of quantum field theory is helpful, the only requirement to follow the lectures is a working knowledge of quantum mechanics and special relativity. The guiding principle in choosing the topics presented (apart from serving as introductions to later courses) was to present some basic aspects of the theory that present conceptual subtleties.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Monopoles and Dyons Revisited
    European Journal of Physics PAPER Related content - Magnetic monopoles Magnetic monopoles and dyons revisited: a useful Kimball A Milton - On the classical motion of a charge in the contribution to the study of classical mechanics field of a magnetic monopole Jean Sivardière To cite this article: Renato P dos Santos 2015 Eur. J. Phys. 36 035022 - Magnetic monopoles in gauge field theories P Goddard and D I Olive View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - A discussion of Bl conservation on a two dimensional magnetic field plane in watt balances Shisong Li et al This content was downloaded from IP address 131.169.5.251 on 15/11/2018 at 01:17 European Journal of Physics Eur. J. Phys. 36 (2015) 035022 (22pp) doi:10.1088/0143-0807/36/3/035022 Magnetic monopoles and dyons revisited: a useful contribution to the study of classical mechanics Renato P dos Santos PPGECIM, ULBRA—Lutheran University of Brazil, Av. Farroupilha, 8001—Pr. 14, S. 338—92425-900 Canoas, RS, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Received 6 October 2014, revised 20 February 2015 Accepted for publication 23 February 2015 Published 27 March 2015 Abstract Graduate-level physics curricula in many countries around the world, as well as senior-level undergraduate ones in some major institutions, include classical mechanics courses, mostly based on Goldstein’s textbook masterpiece. During the discussion of central force motion, however, the Kepler problem is vir- tually the only serious application presented. In this paper, we present another problem that is also soluble, namely the interaction of Schwinger’s dual- charged (dyon) particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Hep-Th/0006117V1 16 Jun 2000 Oadmarolf Donald VERSION HYPER - Style
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style. - HYPER VERSION SUGP-00/6-1 hep-th/0006117 Chern-Simons terms and the Three Notions of Charge Donald Marolf Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244 Abstract: In theories with Chern-Simons terms or modified Bianchi identities, it is useful to define three notions of either electric or magnetic charge associated with a given gauge field. A language for discussing these charges is introduced and the proper- ties of each charge are described. ‘Brane source charge’ is gauge invariant and localized but not conserved or quantized, ‘Maxwell charge’ is gauge invariant and conserved but not localized or quantized, while ‘Page charge’ conserved, localized, and quantized but not gauge invariant. This provides a further perspective on the issue of charge quanti- zation recently raised by Bachas, Douglas, and Schweigert. For the Proceedings of the E.S. Fradkin Memorial Conference. Keywords: Supergravity, p–branes, D-branes. arXiv:hep-th/0006117v1 16 Jun 2000 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Brane Source Charge and Brane-ending effects 3 3. Maxwell Charge and Asymptotic Conditions 6 4. Page Charge and Kaluza-Klein reduction 7 5. Discussion 9 1. Introduction One of the intriguing properties of supergravity theories is the presence of Abelian Chern-Simons terms and their duals, the modified Bianchi identities, in the dynamics of the gauge fields. Such cases have the unusual feature that the equations of motion for the gauge field are non-linear in the gauge fields even though the associated gauge groups are Abelian. For example, massless type IIA supergravity contains a relation of the form dF˜4 + F2 H3 =0, (1.1) ∧ where F˜4, F2,H3 are gauge invariant field strengths of rank 4, 2, 3 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Two-Dimensional Instantons with Bosonization and Physics of Adjoint QCD2
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Preprint ITEP–TH–21/96 Two-Dimensional Instantons with Bosonization and Physics of Adjoint QCD2. A.V. Smilga ITEP, B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow 117259, Russia Abstract We evaluate partition functions ZI in topologically nontrivial (instanton) gauge sectors in the bosonized version of the Schwinger model and in a gauged WZNW model corresponding to QCD2 with adjoint fermions. We show that the bosonized model is equivalent to the fermion model only if a particular form of the WZNW action with gauge-invariant integrand is chosen. For the exact correspondence, it is necessary to 2 integrate over the ways the gauge group SU(N)/ZN is embedded into the full O(N −1) group for the bosonized matter field. For even N, one should also take into account the 2 n contributions of both disconnected components in O(N − 1). In that case, ZI ∝ m 0 for small fermion masses where 2n0 coincides with the number of fermion zero modes in n a particular instanton background. The Taylor expansion of ZI /m 0 in mass involves only even powers of m as it should. The physics of adjoint QCD2 is discussed. We argue that, for odd N, the discrete chiral symmetry Z2 ⊗Z2 present in the action is broken spontaneously down to Z2 and the fermion condensate < λλ¯ >0 is formed. The system undergoes a first order phase transition at Tc = 0 so that the condensate is zero at an arbitrary small temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Five-Branes in Heterotic Brane-World Theories
    SUSX-TH/01-037 HUB-EP-01/34 hep-th/0109173 Five-Branes in Heterotic Brane-World Theories Matthias Br¨andle1∗ and Andr´eLukas2§ 1Institut f¨ur Physik, Humboldt Universit¨at Invalidenstraße 110, 10115 Berlin, Germany 2Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Sussex Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK Abstract The effective action for five-dimensional heterotic M-theory in the presence of five-branes is systemat- ically derived from Hoˇrava-Witten theory coupled to an M5-brane world-volume theory. This leads to a 1 five-dimensional N = 1 gauged supergravity theory on S /Z2 coupled to four-dimensional N = 1 theories residing on the two orbifold fixed planes and an additional bulk three-brane. We analyse the properties of this action, particularly the four-dimensional effective theory associated with the domain-wall vacuum state. arXiv:hep-th/0109173v2 8 Oct 2001 The moduli K¨ahler potential and the gauge-kinetic functions are determined along with the explicit relations between four-dimensional superfields and five-dimensional component fields. ∗email: [email protected] §email: [email protected] 1 Introduction A large class of attractive five-dimensional brane-world models can be constructed by reducing Hoˇrava-Witten theory [1, 2, 3] on Calabi-Yau three-folds. This procedure has been first carried out in Ref. [4, 5, 6] and it leads 1 to gauged five-dimensional N = 1 supergravity on the orbifold S /Z2 coupled to N = 1 gauge and gauge matter multiplets located on the two four-dimensional orbifold fixed planes. It has been shown [7]–[13] that a phenomeno- logically interesting particle spectrum on the orbifold planes can be obtained by appropriate compactifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Flux Tubes, Domain Walls and Orientifold Planar Equivalence
    Flux tubes, domain walls and orientifold planar equivalence Agostino Patella CERN GGI, 5 May 2011 Agostino Patella (CERN) Tubes and walls GGI, 5/5/11 1 / 19 Introduction Orientifold planar equivalence Orientifold planar equivalence OrQCD 2 SU(N) gauge theory (λ = g N fixed) with Nf Dirac fermions in the antisymmetric representation is equivalent in the large-N limit and in a common sector to AdQCD 2 SU(N) gauge theory (λ = g N fixed) with Nf Majorana fermions in the adjoint representation if and only if C-symmetry is not spontaneously broken. Agostino Patella (CERN) Tubes and walls GGI, 5/5/11 2 / 19 2 Z Z ff e−N W(J) = DADψDψ¯ exp −S(A, ψ, ψ¯) + N2 J(x)O(x)d4x Introduction Orientifold planar equivalence Gauge-invariant common sector AdQCD BOSONIC C-EVEN FERMIONIC C-EVEN BOSONIC C-ODD FERMIONIC C-ODD ~ w ­ OrQCD BOSONIC C-EVEN BOSONIC C-ODD COMMON SECTOR Agostino Patella (CERN) Tubes and walls GGI, 5/5/11 3 / 19 Introduction Orientifold planar equivalence Gauge-invariant common sector AdQCD BOSONIC C-EVEN FERMIONIC C-EVEN BOSONIC C-ODD FERMIONIC C-ODD ~ w ­ OrQCD BOSONIC C-EVEN BOSONIC C-ODD COMMON SECTOR 2 Z Z ff e−N W(J) = DADψDψ¯ exp −S(A, ψ, ψ¯) + N2 J(x)O(x)d4x lim WOr(J) = lim WAd(J) N→∞ N→∞ Agostino Patella (CERN) Tubes and walls GGI, 5/5/11 3 / 19 Introduction Orientifold planar equivalence Gauge-invariant common sector AdQCD BOSONIC C-EVEN FERMIONIC C-EVEN BOSONIC C-ODD FERMIONIC C-ODD ~ w ­ OrQCD BOSONIC C-EVEN BOSONIC C-ODD COMMON SECTOR 2 Z Z ff e−N W(J) = DADψDψ¯ exp −S(A, ψ, ψ¯) + N2 J(x)O(x)d4x hO(x ) ··· O(xn)i hO(x ) ···
    [Show full text]
  • Dyon-Axion Dynamics
    Volume 125B, number 2,3 PHYSICS LETTERS 26 May 1983 DYON-AXION DYNAMICS Willy FISCHLER 1 Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA and John PRESKILL 2 Lyman Laboratory of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Received 25 February 1983 We examine the coupling between magnetic monopoles and axions induced by the Witten effect, and discuss the cosmo- logical implications of monopole-axion interactions. The discovery by Witten [ 1] that a magnetic mono- oscillations of the axion field [5] to relax to a cosmo- pole of minimal magnetic charge acquires electric logically acceptable value. charge -e0/2~r in a 0-vacuum has led to deep insights To derive the connection between the Witten effect into the fermionic structure of monopoles [2]. In this and the monopole-axion coupling, we recall that the note, we point out another implication of the Witten lagrangian density of electrodynamics may contain the effect - this effect induces a coupling between mono- term poles and axions. We compute the energy of the axion •120 = (Oe2/47r2)E.B, (1) ground state in the field of a magnetic monopole and the cross section for axion-monopole scattering, in an where 0 is a free parameter. In the absence of magnet- idealized world in which there are no light electrically- ic charges, this term is a total divergence, and has no charged fermions. Unfortunately, axion-monopole physical consequences. But if a magnetic monopole is interactions become drastically modified if light present, this term has important effects. charged fermions exist, and our calculations do not In unified models in which the CP-nonconservation apply to this more realistic case.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirac Equation for Strings in Minkowski Space-Time and Then Study the Radial Vibrations of the String
    Dirac equation for strings Maciej Trzetrzelewski ∗ M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Lojasiewicza, St. 11, 30-348 Krak´ow, Poland Abstract Starting with a Nambu-Goto action, a Dirac-like equation can be constructed by taking the square-root of the momentum constraint. The eigenvalues of the resulting Hamiltonian are real and correspond to masses of the excited string. In particular there are no tachyons. A special case of radial oscillations of a closed string in Minkowski space-time admits exact solutions in terms of wave functions of the harmonic oscillator. 1 Introduction In 1962 Dirac considered the possibility that leptons may be described arXiv:1302.5907v3 [hep-th] 14 Feb 2018 by extended objects of spherical topology [1, 2]. In this way one could understand the muon as an excitation of the ground state of the membrane - the electron. Anticipating Nambu [3] and Goto [4] by almost a decade he introduced what is now known as a generalization of the Nambu-Goto action to the case of membranes. Using Bohr- Sommerfeld approximation for the Hamiltonian corresponding to the radial mode, one can then show [1] that the mass of the first excitation is about 53me where me is the mass of the electron. This is about a quarter of the observed mass of the muon. In fact, when instead of ∗e-mail: [email protected] 1 the Bohr-Sommerfeld approximation one uses, more precise, numeri- cal methods one finds that the correct value of the first excitation is about 43me [5, 6]. Therefore Dirac’s model ”explains” 1/5th of the actual value of the muon mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Particles in Topological Insulators
    EXOTIC PARTICLES IN TOPOLOGICAL INSULATORS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Rundong Li July 2010 © 2010 by Rundong Li. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/yx514yb1109 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Shoucheng Zhang, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Ian Fisher I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Steven Kivelson Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii Abstract Recently a new class of quantum state of matter, the time-reversal invariant topo- logical insulators, have been theoretically proposed and experimentally discovered.
    [Show full text]