Disease Resistance and Susceptibility of Newly Released Apple Cultivars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Disease Resistance and Susceptibility of Newly Released Apple Cultivars Disease Susceptibility of New Apple Cultivars Keith Yoder Virginia Tech AREC Winchester, VA Mid-Atlantic Fruit and Vegetable Convention Hershey, PA February 2, 2012 With credits to Dr. Steve Miller, USDA-Kearneysville, WV MULTI-STATE PROJECT NE-183 Multi-disciplinary Evaluation of New Apple Cultivars 1994-2004 REGIONAL PROJECT NE-183 Multidisciplinary Evaluation of New Apple Cultivars • Web site: www.ne183.org • Project composed of about 23 matched plantings, 1995 and 1999, in 22 states, Ontario and BC • Winchester planting one of eight directed at disease evaluation; USDA-WV and others aimed at horticultural qualities and pest susceptibility • Cultivars in plantings selected by the varietal selection committee chaired by Duane Greene • Interim reports written annually; four joint publications in Plant Health Progress and a poster at: http://www.caf.wvu.edu/kearneysville/articles/Biggs-etal-NE183-ResearchPoster-DiseaseSusceptibility-ARC.pdf General Protocol for NE-183 Disease Plantings • All cultivars on M.9 rootstock; Braeburn, Golden Delicious, and Yataka also on Mark in ‟95 planting • At Winchester, '95 test trees inter-planted with Fuji; '99 with Ramey York to stabilize disease pressure • Supported with conduit post; single trellis wire • Five replicate blocks • Minimal pruning • Minimal spray program as needed to maintain tree growth - Fire blight controlled with streptomycin - Insecticides as needed - Protectant scab fungicides used sparingly - No summer fungicides • Fruit disease data taken near harvest Cultivars in the 1995 NE-183 Planting Arlet Ginger Gold Pioneer Mac Braeburn Golden Delicious * Pristine Cameo (Carousel) Golden Supreme Sansa Creston (BC8M15-15) * Goldrush Senshu * Enterprise Honeycrisp Shizuka Fortune (NY 429) * NY 75414-1 Suncrisp Fuji, Redsport #2 Orin Sunrise Gala Supreme Yataka (Fuji) * denotes scab-resistant cultivar Cultivars in the 1999 NE-183 Planting Ambrosia Sept. Wonder Fuji Cripps Pink BC-8S-26-50 Rogers McIntosh (Pink Lady) Chinook (8S-27-51) Mutsu Corail (Pinova) * Coop 29 (Sundance) NJ 109 Runkel * Coop 39 (Crimson Crisp) NJ 90 * Scarlet O‟Hara * CQR10T17 * NY 65707-19 (Coop 25) * CQR12T50 (Princess) * NY 79507-49 Zestar! (MN 1824) Golden Delicious, Gibson * NY 79507-72 Ramey York (VA) Hampshire Red Yorking (VA) * denotes scab-resistant cultivar (WV) not included in disease rankings Apple Scab • Known resistant cultivars • A couple surprises Powdery mildew • Dry weather disease • Strong pressure at Winchester • Rapid build-up on young trees • 20% leaf infection reduces yield • Russet / fruit infection at pink • Sulfur would suppress in organic production Cedar-apple rust • Local inoculum pressure • Time of inoculum availability may vary • Apple trees susceptible while still growing • Regional differences? • Data contributed by five states • Hard to control with organic program Quince rust • Local inoculum pressure • Quince rust inoculum in perennial cankers; c-a rust annual galls • Apple trees susceptible at bloom • Occurrence depends on bloom stage during wetting periods • Hit or miss in evaluation period Basis for disease rankings ('99 planting) • All individual rankings based on field data • Mean ranking equally weighted for early and late season diseases • Scab ranking is mean of rankings for % lvs inf. 2000-03 and % fruit inf. „01-03, Winchester • Mildew based on % leaves infected 2000-03, Winchester • Cedar-apple rust ranking based on % lvs infected, equal weighting of data from Winchester, „00-03 and Hudson Valley „01-02. • Quince rust ranking based on mean % fruit infected Winchester, VA, „00-03 data and Hudson Valley „01-02. • All summer disease rankings based on disease incidence at Winchester „01-03. Top ten mean rank order, early season diseases NE-183 „95 planting, Winchester Rankings C-apple Quince Mean Scab Mildew rust rust ranking NY 75414-1 ....... 1 1 1 5 2.0 Gala Supreme ... 4 2 1 8 3.8 Enterprise .......... 1 3 1 13 4.5 Pristine .............. 1 5 15 1 5.5 Sunrise .............. 14 6 1 6 6.8 Sansa ................ 1 4 8 19 8.0 Suncrisp ............ 11.5 22 1 3 9.4 Orin .................... 11.5 16 10 2 9.9 Pioneer Mac ...... 14.5 21 1 6 10.6 Yataka ............... 19.5 7 11 8 11.4 Mean weighted equally for early season disease rankings. Bottom ten mean rank order, early season diseases NE-183 „95 planting, Winchester Rankings C-apple Quince Mean Scab Mildew rust rust ranking Golden Supreme 17 11 7 15 12.5 Fortune .............. 9 12 9 23 13.3 Senshu .............. 16.5 9 16 17 14.6 Braeburn ............ 11 18 20 10 14.8 Fuji, Redsport #2 21 8 13 20 15.5 Ginger Gold ....... 20.5 23 19 3 16.4 G. Delicious ....... 14.5 20 17 15 16.6 Shizuka .............. 21 17 22 11 17.8 Creston .............. 9 19 23 22 18.3 Cameo ............... 21 13 18 21 18.3 Mean weighted equally for early season disease rankings. Top ten mean rank order, summer diseases NE-183 „95 planting, Winchester Rankings Brooks sooty fly Mean spot blotch speck rots ranking Pristine .............. 1 1 2 1 1.3 Sansa ................ 5 3 1 2 2.8 Sunrise .............. 6 2 4 4 4.0 Honeycrisp ........ 1 6 6 6 4.8 Arlet ................... 7 4 5 5 5.3 NY 75414-1 ....... 1 5 12 8 6.5 Pioneer Mac ...... 1 10 15 2 7.0 Golden Supreme 9 7 9 16 10.3 Fortune .............. 6 9 17 9 10.3 Ginger Gold ....... 10 8 8 17 10.8 Mean weighted equally for all summer disease rankings. Bottom ten mean rank order, summer diseases NE-183 „95 planting, Winchester Rankings Brooks sooty fly Mean spot blotch speck rots ranking Yataka ............... 10 15 20 14 14.8 Suncrisp ............ 21 15 3 22 15.3 Cameo ............... 23 12 15 13 15.8 Gala Supreme ... 10 20 19 15 16.0 G. Delicious ....... 20 13 11 21 16.3 Orin .................... 16 17 14 20 16.8 Senshu .............. 18 18 21 10 16.8 Fuji, Redsport #2 15 21 22 12 17.5 Goldrush ............ 14 23 23 19 19.8 Shizuka .............. 17 22 18 23 20.0 Mean weighted equally for all summer disease rankings. Summer disease incidence on NE-183 cultivars in relation to harvest date and accumulated wetting hours, 1999 vs. 2000 1995 planting, Virginia Tech AREC, Winchester VA 1999 2000 harv. wet sooty fly harv. wet sooty fly Cultivar date hours blotch speck rots Cultivar date hours blotch speck rots Pristine 7/29 290 0 0 0 Pristine 7/17 489 26 12 0 Sunrise 8/12 307 0 0 0 Sunrise 8/3 646 54 12 2 Ginger Gold 8/16 321 0 0 0 Ginger Gold 8/11 721 100 18 34 Sansa 8/18 325 0 0 0 Sansa 8/11 721 20 1 1 Arlet 8/30 419 0 0 0 Arlet 8/21 768 37 1 0 Honeycrisp 8/30 419 0 0 0 Honeycrisp 8/21 768 71 17 15 Golden Sup. 9/8 489 8 2 0 Golden Sup. 8/21 768 83 12 12 NY 75414-1 9/9 498 0 0 0 Fortune 9/5 912 100 98 30 Pioneer Mac 9/9 498 6 2 0 NY 75414-1 9/5 912 93 73 12 Senshu 9/15 533 48 30 0 Senshu 9/5 912 100 81 13 Yataka 9/27 609 24 14 0 Pioneer Mac 9/5 912 100 76 1 Creston 9/27 609 38 20 0 G. Delicious 9/8 936 100 78 46 Fortune 9/27 609 20 0 2 Braeburn 9/29 1088 100 34 12 G. Delicious 10/1 653 52 10 26 Yataka 9/29 1088 100 39 31 Five reps. Cumulative wetting hours as rainfall or dew starting ten days after petal fall. 1997 order of ripening of NE-183 cultivars, Winchester, VA Approximate ripening date Sunrise................ 8/4 Creston ................. 9/15 Cameo....................10/10 Pristine................ 8/4 NY 75414-1........... 9/20 Enterprise...............10/15 Arlet ....................8/20 Fortune.................. 9/22 Fuji, Redsport #2....10/15 Sansa..................8/20 Yataka................... 9/22 Gala Supreme........10/15 Ginger Gold ........8/23Cameo Golden Delicious... 9/25 Braeburn.................10/20 Honeycrisp..........8/25 Shizuka ................. 10/3 Goldrush.................10/29 Pioneer Mac ....... 9/1 Suncrisp................ 10/6 Golden Supreme no fruit Senshu................ 9/8 Orin ....................... 10/6 Approximate 1997 fruit ripening dates based on starch ratings, soluble solids and firmness, not on taste or confirmed storability. The long bloom period likely resulted in some variability of fruit maturity. Based on Ginger Gold and Golden Delicious, maturity at Winchester was delayed 7-10 days from “normal”. K. S. Yoder and R. E. Byers,1997 Top ten mean rank order, early and summer diseases NE-183, „95 planting, Winchester Rankings Early Summer Overall season disease mean Pristine ................ 5.5 1.3 3.4 NY 75414-1 ......... 2.0 6.5 4.3 Sunrise ................ 6.8 4.0 5.4 Enterprise ............ 4.5 11.0 7.8 Honeycrisp .......... 11.5 4.8 8.2 Arlet ..................... 11.6 5.3 8.5 Pioneer Mac ....... 10.6 7.0 8.8 Gala Supreme .... 3.8 16.0 9.9 Golden Supreme 12.5 10.3 11.4 Fortune ................ 13.3 10.3 11.8 Ranking equally weighted for all disease columns. Bottom ten mean rank order, early and summer diseases, NE-183 „95 planting, Winchester Rankings Early Summer Overall season disease mean Orin .................... 9.9 16.8 13.4 Ginger Gold ....... 16.4 10.8 13.6 Braeburn ............ 14.8 14.5 14.7 Senshu .............. 14.6 16.8 15.7 Goldrush ............ 12.3 19.8 16.1 Creston .............. 18.3 14.5 16.4 G. Delicious ....... 16.6 16.3 16.5 Fuji, Redsport #2 15.5 17.5 16.5 Cameo ............... 18.3 15.8 17.1 Shizuka .............. 17.8 20.0 18.9 Ranking equally weighted for all disease columns.
Recommended publications
  • Applewood Focused on Apple Varieties
    - Advertisement - Applewood focused on apple varieties August 21, 2019 Applewood Fresh Growers LLC is distinguishing itself with planning for the “next best managed varieties,” according to Nick Mascari, Applewood’s president. The Michigan grower-packer-shipper is testing apple varieties in the ground as part of the work toward serving the trade with the best of oncoming special new apple varieties. “We are really looking at making a statement with managed varieties and higher-end apples.” Mascari said that, for competitive reasons, “I can’t be specific” on what is being tested, but “we have five potential new varieties in test blocks.” If those are not ready for production now, “they will be further out. We are on the forefront for new sport varieties, and new strains of old varieties, atop having new managed varieties.” Antonia Mascari was recently promoted to become 1 / 3 the vice president of marketing for Applewood Fresh Growers LLC.With this, Applewood’s sales and marketing arm is “using more data to guide growers and customers” toward the best of the apples that will be coming from Michigan. By tracking data from all growing regions on apple sales for 52 weeks a year, growers can have the best information for planning the timing of new plantings and “we can help guide our customers to have the right assortment at the right times in their stores.” Mascari said USDA statistical data shows “We are the second largest grower-shipper in Michigan. Period. Our growth in volume is due to our team. We are pleased to be the leading sales company in Michigan.” “Our quality and volume will be up this year,” he continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Apples Catalogue 2019
    ADAMS PEARMAIN Herefordshire, England 1862 Oct 15 Nov Mar 14 Adams Pearmain is a an old-fashioned late dessert apple, one of the most popular varieties in Victorian England. It has an attractive 'pearmain' shape. This is a fairly dry apple - which is perhaps not regarded as a desirable attribute today. In spite of this it is actually a very enjoyable apple, with a rich aromatic flavour which in apple terms is usually described as Although it had 'shelf appeal' for the Victorian housewife, its autumnal colouring is probably too subdued to compete with the bright young things of the modern supermarket shelves. Perhaps this is part of its appeal; it recalls a bygone era where subtlety of flavour was appreciated - a lovely apple to savour in front of an open fire on a cold winter's day. Tree hardy. Does will in all soils, even clay. AERLIE RED FLESH (Hidden Rose, Mountain Rose) California 1930’s 19 20 20 Cook Oct 20 15 An amazing red fleshed apple, discovered in Aerlie, Oregon, which may be the best of all red fleshed varieties and indeed would be an outstandingly delicious apple no matter what color the flesh is. A choice seedling, Aerlie Red Flesh has a beautiful yellow skin with pale whitish dots, but it is inside that it excels. Deep rose red flesh, juicy, crisp, hard, sugary and richly flavored, ripening late (October) and keeping throughout the winter. The late Conrad Gemmer, an astute observer of apples with 500 varieties in his collection, rated Hidden Rose an outstanding variety of top quality.
    [Show full text]
  • APPLE (Fruit Varieties)
    E TG/14/9 ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2005-04-06 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS GENEVA * APPLE (Fruit Varieties) UPOV Code: MALUS_DOM (Malus domestica Borkh.) GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY Alternative Names:* Botanical name English French German Spanish Malus domestica Apple Pommier Apfel Manzano Borkh. The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These Test Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the General Introduction and its associated TGP documents. Other associated UPOV documents: TG/163/3 Apple Rootstocks TG/192/1 Ornamental Apple * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] i:\orgupov\shared\tg\applefru\tg 14 9 e.doc TG/14/9 Apple, 2005-04-06 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. SUBJECT OF THESE TEST GUIDELINES..................................................................................................3 2. MATERIAL REQUIRED ...............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Five Unique Varieties of Apple
    APPLE FILLINGS A journey across Did you know that there are multiple varieties of apple, each one of them having unique flavours the apple and properties? Each variety has its own influence on the taste of our fruit fillings. There sensorial space is more to the apple story than at first appears. 5 VARIETIES Discover five unique varieties of apple: BRAMLEY • Officialy called Bramleys’ seeding BOSKOOP • Origin: Nottinghamshire, England, UK. • Species: Belle de Boskoop, • Introduced in 1837 Malus Domestica • Harvest: mid-late season • Origin: Boskoop, Gouda, The Netherlands • Introduced in 1850’s • Harvest: mid season JONAGOLD • Species: Malus Domestica (Golden delicious x Jonathan varieties) • Origin: Geneva, New York, USA • Introduced in 1943 • Harvest: late season PINK LADY • Pink lady is the (patented) trademark, the variety is known as Cripps Pink GRANNY SMITH • Species: Malus Domestica (Golden Delicious x Lady Williams) • Species: Malus Domestica • Origin: Western Australia • Origin: Australia • Introduced in the late 20th century • Introduced in 1860’s • Harvest: very-late season • Harvest: very-late season The flavour wheels show the flavour profiles of the fresh, unprocessed apples, that can easily FLAVOUR PROFILE be recognised in our different Topfils. SWEET sweet JONAGOLD red fruit notes The Jonagold is the sweetest variety cooked compote of this range. It has a very well- ripe fruit notes (pear, banana) balanced apple profile with some sour green and red fruit notes. green fruit notes (citrusy, unripe, fresh) astringent cider musty-woody PINK LADY The Pink Lady is slightly more sour than the Jonagold. It is very perfumy with specific pear/banana scents. These scents contribute to its nice ripe and juicy apple profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Flesh Browning Disorder of 'Pink Lady' Apples
    Th e Flesh Browning Disorder of ‘Pink Lady’™ Apples Hannah James1 and Jenny Jobling2 1Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 2Applied Horticultural Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia he ‘Cripps Pink’ apple has become a popular vari- to be below the ety both in Australia where it was developed and acceptable lim- Tinternationally due to the distinctive fl avor charac- its for fi rmness teristics and at- and had also de- tractive appear- veloped an un- “Our research in Australia has shown that ance of the fruit. acceptable level Figure 1. Radial fl esh browning disorder (RFB) of the fl esh browning disorder of ‘Pink To establish a of skin greasi- ‘Pink Lady’™ apples in Australia. Lady’™ apples is three distinct disorders strong position ness prompting (radial fl esh browning, diff use fl esh among new and stricter quality guidelines to be enforced. In addition, a fl esh browning and CO2 injury.) Radial fl esh popular culti- browning disorder was detected; in 2003, 35 containers of browning was found to occur in warm vars, the ‘Cripps ‘Pink Lady’TM apples that had been exported from Australia growing districts and is characterized by Pink’ apple has to the United Kingdom were rejected due to the presence of browning of the vascular tissue of the been extensively the fl esh browning disorder, representing a large economic fruit, with the cortex tissue remaining marketed under loss to Australian apple growers and the potential loss of TM clear and relatively unaff ected. the trademarked the reputation of the ‘Pink Lady’ brand. TM Diff use fl esh browning was found to name ‘Pink La- Th e fl esh browning disorder of ‘Pink Lady’ apples TM occur in cool growing districts and is dy ’.
    [Show full text]
  • Handling of Apple Transport Techniques and Efficiency Vibration, Damage and Bruising Texture, Firmness and Quality
    Centre of Excellence AGROPHYSICS for Applied Physics in Sustainable Agriculture Handling of Apple transport techniques and efficiency vibration, damage and bruising texture, firmness and quality Bohdan Dobrzañski, jr. Jacek Rabcewicz Rafa³ Rybczyñski B. Dobrzañski Institute of Agrophysics Polish Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence AGROPHYSICS for Applied Physics in Sustainable Agriculture Handling of Apple transport techniques and efficiency vibration, damage and bruising texture, firmness and quality Bohdan Dobrzañski, jr. Jacek Rabcewicz Rafa³ Rybczyñski B. Dobrzañski Institute of Agrophysics Polish Academy of Sciences PUBLISHED BY: B. DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ACTIVITIES OF WP9 IN THE CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE AGROPHYSICS CONTRACT NO: QLAM-2001-00428 CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR APPLIED PHYSICS IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE WITH THE th ACRONYM AGROPHYSICS IS FOUNDED UNDER 5 EU FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ACTIVITIES GENERAL SUPERVISOR OF THE CENTRE: PROF. DR. RYSZARD T. WALCZAK, MEMBER OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES PROJECT COORDINATOR: DR. ENG. ANDRZEJ STĘPNIEWSKI WP9: PHYSICAL METHODS OF EVALUATION OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE QUALITY LEADER OF WP9: PROF. DR. ENG. BOHDAN DOBRZAŃSKI, JR. REVIEWED BY PROF. DR. ENG. JÓZEF KOWALCZUK TRANSLATED (EXCEPT CHAPTERS: 1, 2, 6-9) BY M.SC. TOMASZ BYLICA THE RESULTS OF STUDY PRESENTED IN THE MONOGRAPH ARE SUPPORTED BY: THE STATE COMMITTEE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH UNDER GRANT NO. 5 P06F 012 19 AND ORDERED PROJECT NO. PBZ-51-02 RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF POMOLOGY AND FLORICULTURE B. DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ©Copyright by BOHDAN DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES LUBLIN 2006 ISBN 83-89969-55-6 ST 1 EDITION - ISBN 83-89969-55-6 (IN ENGLISH) 180 COPIES, PRINTED SHEETS (16.8) PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER IN POLAND BY: ALF-GRAF, UL.
    [Show full text]
  • Participating Deltacare USA Dental Offices / Consultorios Dentales De La Red Deltacare USA - California
    Participating DeltaCare USA Dental Offices / Consultorios dentales de la red DeltaCare USA - California Additional Dental Offices will be added as required. You may call our Customer Service department at 800-422-4234 for updates to the provider list. If any office is closed to further enrollment, Delta Dental reserves the right to assign you to another office as close to your home as possible. / Se agregaran mas Oficinas Dentales adicionales conforme se vayan necesitando. Puede llamar al departamento de Servicio al Cliente al 800-422-4234 para obtener una lista de los proveedores. Delta Dental se reserva el derecho de asignarle otra oficina dental lo mas cercana a su casa como sea posible. Please visit our website at deltadentalins.com for the most current listing of dentists. / Por favor visite nuestro sitio web en deltadentalins.com para la lista más actualizada de dentistas. NOTE: Contact the provider before making your choice if you have scheduling problems or small children. / NOTA: Contacte al proveedor antes de escogerlo si tiene problemas o niños pequeños. LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE: Language capabilities are self-reported by the individual dental facilities and not independently verified by Delta Dental. If an enrollee requires language assistance to enable communication in a dental setting, Delta Dental will arrange for professional services through a certified interpretation vendor at no cost to the enrollee. / ATENCIÓN EN OTROS IDIOMAS: Las habilidades en idiomas son informadas por las instalaciones dentales individuales y no son verificadas independientemente por Delta Dental. Si un afiliado requiere ayuda en otro idioma para poder comunicarse durante la cita dental, Delta Dental coordinará los servicios profesionales mediante un proveedor certificado de interpretación sin costo para el afiliado.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank Dog Shows
    RANKING OF DOG SHOWS, AGILITY TRIALS, OBEDIENCE TRIALS AND RALLY TRIALS SHOW AND LOCATION DOGS IN POSITION COMPETITION ALL BREED SHOWS 2006 2005 2006 2005 Anniston KC,(11/24),Montgomery,AL............................... 793 588 836 1174 Anniston KC,(04/28),Montgomery,AL............................... 622 597 1098 1160 TOP 25 ALL BREED SHOWS BY ENTRY Anoka Co MN KC,(06/23),Cambridge,MN....................... 966 916 605 694 Anoka Co MN KC,(06/22),Cambridge,MN....................... 882 842 717 784 Antelope Vly KC,(05/28),Pomona,CA.............................. 2002 2141 74 52 SHOW AND LOCATION DOGS IN POSITION COMPETITION Antelope Vly KC,(11/05),Irwindale,CA............................. 1514 1450 213 247 2006 2005 2006 2005 Apple Vly KC,(03/12),Victorville,CA ................................. 742 929 919 683 Apple Vly KC,(03/11),Victorville,CA ................................. 692 935 987 676 Arkansas KC,(06/24),Little Rock,AR................................ 769 852 876 771 Kennel Cl Palm Springs,(01/07),Indio,CA ....................... 3523 3319 1 3 Arkansas KC,(06/25),Little Rock,AR................................ 748 798 911 845 Louisville KC,(03/17),Louisville,KY.................................. 3521 3368 2 2 Asheville KC,(06/10),Fletcher,NC.................................... 1351 1288 286 329 Evansville KC,(03/18),Louisville,KY................................. 3454 3373 3 1 Asheville KC,(06/11),Fletcher,NC .................................... 1292 1204 323 374 Kennel Cl Palm Springs,(01/08),Indio,CA ....................... 3345 3080 4 6 Ashtabula KC,(07/15),Madison,OH ................................. 1047 1098 514 472 Louisville KC,(03/19),Louisville,KY.................................. 3277 3229 5 4 Ashtabula KC,(01/15),Hamburg,NY ................................ 1000 989 572 596 Harrisburg KC,(04/15),Harrisburg,PA .............................. 3104 3107 6 5 Atlanta KC,(04/15),Perry,GA...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Continuing Project Report
    FINAL PROJECT REPORT Project Title: Genetic controls of apple fruit-specific auxin metabolism PI: Yanmin Zhu Co-PI(2): James Mattheis Organization: TFRL-ARS-USDA Organization: TFRL-ARS-USDA Telephone: (509) 664-2280 Telephone: (509) 664-2280 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Address: 1104 N. Western Ave Address: 1104 N. Western Ave City: Wenatchee City: Wenatchee State/Zip: WA 98801 State/Zip: WA 98801 Co-PI(3): Kate Evans Organization: TFREC, WSU Telephone: 509-663-8181 Email: [email protected] Address: 1100 N. Western Ave City: Wenatchee State/Zip: WA 98801 Other funding sources: None Total Project Funding: $131,000 Budget History: Item 2010 2011(extended) Year 3: Salaries 35,000 36,000 Benefits 14,000 14,000 Wages Benefits Equipment Supplies 15,000 15,000 Travel Plot Fees Miscellaneous 1,000 1,000 Total 65,000 66,000 OBJECTIVES: 1. Elucidate roles for previously identified candidate genes in ethylene, auxin, gibberellin, jasmonate and brassinosteroid metabolism and response during apple fruit ripening. 2. Characterize the relationship between gene expression patterns and specific fruit ripening phenotypes (ripening season, fruit size, fruit texture) in a cross population of ‘Honeycrisp’ x ‘Cripps Pink’, as well as other germplasm. 3. Develop a shortlist of candidate genes for hormone metabolism for further validation for use in marker assisted selection. SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS 1. Most of the selected genes, based on the results from previous microarray or gene chip analysis, showed correlations with apple fruit ripening processes among a wide spectrum of apple germplasm including several commercial cultivars and a segregating population of ‘Honeycrisp’ x ‘Cripps Pink’.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Evaluation of New, Antique, and Little Known Apple Varieties
    Consumer Evaluation of New, Antique, and Little Known Apple Varieties Duane W. Greene and Jon M. Clements Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts Introduction for them. Honeycrisp is an example of an apple that not only has become extremely popular, but Massachusetts has had a long history of apple Massachusetts appears to be a favorable place to grow production. Due to its favorable climate, it has been a this apple. leading producer in the United State of the variety In the past, private breeders, University breeding McIntosh, along with Maine, Vermont, and New York. programs, and nurseries received compensation for Over the past few years, the dynamics of apple patented varieties by receiving royalties from the sale production has changed dramatically due in large part of trees. Because apple breeding programs are very to the rapid expansion of apple production overseas, expensive to operate, the royalties received were especially in the southern hemisphere and a logarithmic insufficient to cover the cost to maintain a breeding increase in production in China. While Massachusetts program. Undoubtedly, new varieties will be released has a climate that favors the production of high quality in the future in an entirely different way. Tree sales, apples, return to growers has declined steadily over production, and marketing of the best and most the past 20 years. Other geographic locations can promising varieties will be under the strict control of produce nearly twice as many apples per acre because patent holders. Trees will be sold only to large growers of high light conditions, a long growing season, and willing to sign agreements, and they will probably be abundant water.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Pesticide Report for 1981
    CarffTna /II H'M Rafeigh Pe/tkide Report FOR ^1981 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE JAMES A. GRAHAM, Commissioner 248 JUNE 1982 North Carolina PESTICIDE REPORT for January 1 - December 31, 1981 THE BULLETIN of the North Carolina Department of Agriculture Raleigh, N. C. James A. Graham, Commissioner William G. Parham, Jr., Deputy Commissioner Leonard F. Blanton, Director, Food and Drug Protection Division John L. Smith, Pesticide Administrator Food and Drug Protection Division Number 248 1982 5,800 Table of Contents Page Foreword 7 How to Use this Report 8 Introduction 10 Brief of the North Carolina Pesticide Law of 1971 12 Regulations Adopted by the North Carolina Pesticide Board 15 Pesticide Registrants, 1981 81 Licensed Pesticide Dealers, 1981 99 Licensed Pesticide Applicators (Aerial), 1981 138 Licensed Pesticide Applicators (Ground), 1981 144 Licensed Public Operators, 1981 (Federal, State, County and Municipal Governments and Public Utilities) 187 Licensed Pest Control Consultants, 1981 220 Definitions of Decisions 221 Table I - Pesticides Examined, 1981 222 Table II - Samples at Variance from Guarantee, 1981 237 Other Violations, 1981 244 Summary of Regulatory Activities Performed Under the North Carolina Pesticide Law, 1981 246 James A. Graham, Commissioner Foreword 7 The 1981 Edition of the North Carolina Pesticide Report represents a revision of previous issues. By elaborating on the purpose of this report, by adding new material, and by better defining the substances listed, we attempted to reflect in a more meaningful manner the information collected during the 1981 calendar year. We hope that more readers will be able to use it more effectively and be able to understand how its use can facili- tate the pesticide industry from manufacturer to consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • INF03 Reduce Lists of Apple Varieites
    ECE/TRADE/C/WP.7/GE.1/2009/INF.3 Specialized Section on Standardization of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Fifty-fifth session Geneva, 4 - 8 May 2009 Items 4(a) of the provisional agenda REVISION OF UNECE STANDARDS Proposals on the list of apple varieties This note has been put together by the secretariat following the decision taken by the Specialized Section at its fifty-fourth session to collect information from countries on varieties that are important in international trade. Replies have been received from the following countries: Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Slovakia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland and the USA. This note also includes the documents compiled for the same purpose and submitted to the fifty-second session of the Specialized Section. I. Documents submitted to the 52nd session of the Specialized Section A. UNECE Standard for Apples – List of Varieties At the last meeting the 51 st session of the Specialized Section GE.1 the delegation of the United Kingdom offered to coordinate efforts to simplify the list of apple varieties. The aim was to see what the result would be if we only include the most important varieties that are produced and traded. The list is designed to help distinguish apple varieties by colour groups, size and russeting it is not exhaustive, non-listed varieties can still be marketed. The idea should not be to list every variety grown in every country. The UK asked for views on what were considered to be the most important top thirty varieties. Eight countries sent their views, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, USA, Slovakia, Germany Finland and the Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]