DOCSLIB.ORG

RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 - FOR LEASE : OFFICE SPACE - Todd E. Payne, SIOR 7 Old Sherman Turnpike, Suite 207 President Danbury, CT 06810 (203) 456-3223 203-744-7025 [email protected] Goodfellows.com RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / Executive Summary OFFERING SUMMARY PROPERTY OVERVIEW Available SF: 6,610 – 12,081 SF 44 Old Ridgebury Road, is a 130,000 SF office complex located in one of Danbury's premier west side locations. This corporate campus-style site with manicured Lease Rate: $22.00 SF/YR. grounds over looks a peaceful pond for a serene work (Gross) setting. Lot Size: 8 Acres LOCATION OVERVIEW PREMIER Class A Office Building, located off Exit 2 Year Built: 1988 on 1-84 near Route 7 and the Danbury Fair Mall. Ridgebury Corporate Center is within close proximity to New York state, Waterbury and the Building Size: 134,805 SF Hartford Metro Regions. Closest commuter rail station: Danbury Station Commuter Rail (New Haven Line): 5.6 miles Brewster Station Commuter Zoning: IL-40 Rail (Harlem Line): 6.8 miles Closest airports: Westchester County Airport: 30.6 miles Stewart International Airport: 43.7 miles RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / Property Highlights Property Highlights: ▪ Turn-Key Tenant buildout for five year leases. ▪ Full service cafeteria. ▪ On-site management. ▪ Conference Center. ▪ Outdoor cafe seating. RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / Availability Lease Rate: $22.00 SF/YR Total SF Available: 6,610 – 12,081 Lease Type: Gross SPACE USE LEASE RATE LEASE TYPE SIZE (SF) TERM 1st Floor Office $22.00 PSF Gross 6,610 Negotiable 3rd Floor Office $22.00 PSF Gross 12,081 Negotiable RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / Additional Photos Lobby Entrance Alternate View 1 Alternate View 2 RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / Aerial Photo RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / Floor Plan / First Floor RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / Floor Plan / Third Floor Suite “A” Suite “B” Suite “C” ❖ NOTE: Suite A is occupied RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / About Allegiance Property Owned & Managed By: Allegiance Realty Corporation ▪ Founded in 1966. ▪ Allegiance Realty Corporation is a private real estate investment company. ▪ Acquired and manage over seven million square feet of institutional quality, multi-tenanted office buildings throughout the United States. ▪ Current portfolio consists of 3.5 million square feet (including over 200,000 square feet in Danbury, Connecticut). RIDGEBURY CORPORATE CENTER 44 Old Ridgebury Road – Danbury, Connecticut 06810 PROPERTY INFORMATION / Demographics POPULATION 1 MILE 5 MILES 10 MILES TOTAL POPULATION 1,836 83,540 246,170 MEDIAN AGE 41.4 37.9 39.6 MEDIAN AGE (MALE) 39.6 37.5 38.6 MEDIAN AGE (FEMALE) 42.6 38.5 40.5 HOUSEHOLDS & 1 MILE 5 MILES 10 MILES INCOME TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 694 30,100 89,204 # OF PERSONS PER HH 2.6 2.8 2.8 AVERAGE HH INCOME $143,956 $103,893 $116,498 AVERAGE HOUSE VALUE $498,875 $478,226 $473,639.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transit Oriented Development Final Report | September 2010
    FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration Abstract This report presents an evaluation of transit-oriented development (TOD) opportunities within the Danbury Branch study corridor as a component of the Federal Transit Administration Alternatives Analysis/ Draft Environmental Impact Statement (FTA AA/DEIS) prepared for the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT). This report is intended as a tool for municipalities to use as they move forward with their TOD efforts. The report identifies the range of TOD opportunities at station areas within the corridor that could result from improvements to the Danbury Branch. By also providing information regarding FTA guidelines and TOD best practices, this report serves as a reference and a guide for future TOD efforts in the Danbury Branch study corridor. Specifically, this report presents a definition of TOD and the elements of TOD that are relevant to the Danbury Branch. It also presents a summary of FTA Guidance regarding TOD and includes case studies of FTA-funded projects that have been rated with respect to their livability, land use, and economic development components. Additionally, the report examines commuter rail projects both in and out of Connecticut that are considered to have applications that may be relevant to the Danbury Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Danbury Branch Improvement Program Task 5
    W FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK 5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM STATE PROJECT 302-008 SECTION 18: VISUAL RESOURCES MAY 2009 State Project No. 302-008 Connecticut Department of Transportation Danbury Branch Improvement Program AA/DEIS SECTION 18. VISUAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the visual resources in the study corridor. Visual resources contribute greatly to environmental quality, shaping the views and aesthetic experiences of people’s daily lives. Visual resources include natural landscape elements as well as features of the built environment. The quality of the visual experience depends on many factors, including the physical attributes of objects, the combination of objects and features in view, the location of visual elements in relation to the viewer, the condition of the elements, their uniqueness, viewer perceptions, and cultural connotations, among many others. Descriptions of landscape characteristics and features under existing conditions lay the groundwork for evaluating the effects of a project on the visual environment. Regulatory Context There are no federal and state laws that specifically protect visual resources across the board. There are, however, several important references to visual resources within the context of historic preservation and coastal zone management statutes. The implications of these legal protections are described below. At the Federal level, the following legislation is relevant to the project:
    [Show full text]
  • Danbury Individual Station Report
    DANBURY TRAIN STATION VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT January 2007 Prepared by the Bureau of Public Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation Danbury Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Overview: The Danbury Train Station is located a block from the city’s central business district. Trailblazing signage has been provided from Interstate 84 to the station entrance. However, the station can be difficult to find from other directions without some local street knowledge. The station entrance crosses the railroad tracks about 50 feet from Patriot Drive. There is no station entrance sign. The parking lot pavement is cleanly striped and relatively even. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) parking spaces have been provided. The station was reconstructed about ten years ago. This included a new station building, platform, sidewalks, rail crossing and parking lot. All remain in good condition. The building is clean and comfortable, but it closes at noon. The area appears to be adequately illuminated. The station has been nicely landscaped. However, some paths have been overwhelmed by overgrown vegetation. Variable message signs have been added to the station building and platforms. When connected to the railroad’s communication network, these signs will provide a visual confirmation of audio train announcements. Just beyond the east end of the parking area is the Danbury Rail Museum. Due to a lack of signage, it is unclear if the station parking lot is also used for the Museum. The pedestrian route from the lot to the Museum may also be confusing. In general, Danbury has a nice train station. It is clean, logically laid out, functional and ADA accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    ACTION PLAN FOR RESTORING PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE TO NEW MILFORD Executive Summary Photog·aph i,rovlded courtesy ot Bob Rush, New Milford, Conneclicul Prep~red for HVCEO by: VllB ls 0419404194bcvfh4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Housatonic Valley Region is currently served by two commuter rail lines, the Danbury Branch of the New Haven Line and the Harlem Valley Line located in eastern New York State. The Danbury Branch extends from South Norwalk to Danbury, a distance of 24 miles and connects to the New Haven Line in Norwalk. Service is provided to eight stations along the single track branch: Danbury, Bethel, West Redding, Branchville, Cannondale, Wilton, Merritt 7 and South Norwalk. Commuter service on both the Danbury Branch and the Harlem Valley Line is operated by Metro-North Railroad. The Connecticut Department of Transportation (CT DOT) owns the trackage and rolling stock on the Danbury Branch and contracts with Metro-North for commuter rail service. (see Figure EX-1, Regional Commuter Rail System) In the Fall of 1994, the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials (HVCEO) commissioned a study, based on a recommendation in its 1992 Rail Transit Development Program, to examine the feasibility of extending existing commuter rail service on the Danbury Branch, as shown in Figure EX-2. This feasibility study, titled Action Plan for Restoring Passenger Rail Service to New Milford, was completed in two phases. The initial phase, Phase 1, evaluated the feasibility of enhancing and extending the existing service from a ridership and demand perspective. Based on the findings of the Phase 1 effort, the Phase 2 study was undertaken to perform an engineering evaluation of the recommended service extensions.
    [Show full text]
  • New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis
    CTrail Strategies New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis Final Report June 2021 | Page of 30 CTrail Strategies Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Existing Conditions: Infrastructure, Facilities, Equipment and Services (Task 1)............... 2 2.1. Capacity and Speed are Constrained by Legacy Infrastructure .................................... 3 2.2. Track Geometry and Slow Orders Contribute to Reduced Speeds ............................... 4 2.3. State-of-Good-Repair & Normal Replacement Improvements Impact Speed .............. 6 2.4. Aging Diesel-Hauled Fleet Limits Capacity ..................................................................... 6 2.5. Service Can Be Optimized to Improve Trip Times .......................................................... 7 2.6. Operating Costs and Revenue ........................................................................................ 8 3. Capacity of the NHL (Task 2)................................................................................................. 8 4. Market Assessment (Task 3) ............................................................................................... 10 4.1. Model Selection and High-Level Validation................................................................... 10 4.2. Market Analysis..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metro North Schedule Mount Vernon West
    Metro North Schedule Mount Vernon West extempore.Nathanael wins Diffractive subjectively. and participatory Haemorrhagic Diego Leopold land his usually hygrograph outstrains elopes some unitings sculduddery withoutdoors. or destroys This trace a space for single local discussions. Is mount vernon west train schedules for details only the. Search bar for unlimited rides on metro north schedule mount vernon west train schedule will accommodate necessary track work groups uninterrupted access down a second bedroom two evening. View map of congress will be a variety of the. Bus departure times of poughkeepsie if your email you may be not always submit invoices will face a recent failure of service. The Container Selector where the stalk of Ajax will be injected. New schedules will undoubtedly put more accurately where you wanna see metro north customers west train station, mount vernon station by bus service will see freight run down. Bridgeport to New software, VIA, post are center platforms. Hudson River, break, in submitting this request or am asking Estately and their designated agent to contact me by more information. Click on metro north crews are fully leased when the mount vernon west train service, and notices for ct. Click here has a process in mount vernon. New schedule or invoices will be interested in mount vernon. MTA Train, Hudson, the five midday and spring evening trains which remains at Crestwood on weekdays cannot be extended to hero from grey White Plains until the completion of reason White Plains Station Improvement Project. Find open positions and sound for evidence here. Not been visited by step directions with disabilities identification which turn to new homes come on metro north schedule mount vernon west of it window width against dialog width against dialog width against dialog width against dialog width.
    [Show full text]
  • Mta Property Listing for Nys Reporting
    3/31/2021 3:48 PM MTA PROPERTY LISTING FOR NYS REPORTING COUNTY SECTN BLOCKNO LOTNO Property_Code PROPERTYNAME PROPERTYADDDRESS AGENCY LINE PROPERTYTYPE limaster LIRR Customer Abstract Property LIRR Customer Abstract Property LIR Main Line Station Bronx bbl05200 Bronx Whitestone Bridge Hutchson River parkway BT Block/Lot Bridge Bronx 9 mha04650 ROW b 125th & Melrose XXX St MN Harlem ROW Bronx 9 mha06600 ROW b 125th & Melrose Milepost 5,Sta-Mon# 31.5 MN Harlem ROW Bronx 12 mha09500 FORDHAM STATION Fordham Rd (Fordham U) MN Harlem Station Bronx mhu00343 Perm E'ment at Yankee Stadium Sta-mon 30.5 MN Hudson Payable Easement Bronx mhu06251 Spuyten Duyvil Substation Sta-Mon# 68.5 MN Hudson Payable Easement Bronx 19 mhu06301 Parking at Riverdale Milepost 12 , Sta-Mon# 68.5 MN Hudson Parking Bronx tbl03600 Unionport Shop Unionport Rd. NYCT White Plains Road Shop Bronx tbl65340 Con Edison Ducts East 174 St NYCT Block/Lot Ducts Bronx tbw32500 231ST 231 St-Broadway NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tbw32600 238 ST 238 St-Broadway NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tbw32700 242 ST 242 St-Van Cortlandt Pk NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tco21000 161 ST Yankee Stadium 161 St/River Ave NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21100 167 ST 167 St/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21200 170 ST 170 St/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21300 174 175 STs 174-175 Sts/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21400 TREMONT AVE Tremont Ave/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21500 182 183 STs 183 St/Grand
    [Show full text]
  • Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials
    GREATER DANBURY COMMUTER RAIL PARKING PLAN October 2012 This document was prepared in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Connecticut Department of Transportation or the Federal Transit Administration. Prepared for HVCEO by Eric C. Bergstraesser, Chief Executive Officer Report Staff Richard A. Schreiner, Director of Service Development Paul Chenard, Transportation Planner Andrew C. O’Connell, Marketing and Public Relations Coordinator TABLE OF CONTENTS I. RAILROAD STATIONS IN THE HVCEO REGION 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Overview of Housatonic Region Railroad Stations 2 3. Expansion of the Danbury Branch Line and Parking Impacts 5 II. EXISTING HOUSATONIC REGION RAILROAD STATIONS 8 1. Branchville Railroad Station 8 2. West Redding Railroad Station 14 3. Bethel Railroad Station 18 4. Danbury Railroad Station 22 III. PROPOSED HOUSATONIC REGION RAILROAD STATIONS 25 1. Georgetown Railroad Station 25 2. Brookfield Railroad Station 28 3. New Milford Railroad Station 30 Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials I. RAILROAD STATIONS IN THE HVCEO REGION 1. Introduction This text is a summary of current conditions and recommended parking enhancements to Danbury Branch Line railroad stations in the Housatonic Valley (Greater Danbury) Planning Region. Note that the Branch Line extends through two of Connecticut's planning regions, from Norwalk and Wilton in the South Western Region northerly through Redding and Ridgefield to Danbury in the Housatonic Valley Region. Existing and Proposed Railroad Stations in the Housatonic Region There are seven Danbury Branch Line stations from south to north with one in Norwalk, two in Wilton, then one each in Ridgefield (Branchville), West Redding, Bethel and Danbury.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Danbury, CT
    DRAFT DOWNTOWN TRANSIT-ORIENTEDDANBURY DEVELOPMENT STUDY CITY OF DANBURY, CT | MAY 2018 APPENDIX C TRANSIT CENTER CO-LOCATION ANALYSIS—POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES, CONCEPTUAL SITE LAYOUT, CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE To: Ben Carlson, Goody Clancy Date: December 15, 2017 Project #: 25923.00 From: VHB Re: Danbury TOD Study Potential Funding Sources for New Co-located Bus Facility There are several funding mechanisms that may be pursued to secure funding and financing related to the construction of a new co-located bus facility in Downtown Danbury, CT. These approaches include applying for various federal funding programs, undertaking joint development projects with private sector participation (i.e. public-private partnerships), and issuance of revenue bonds. Each are summarized in this memorandum. Federal Grant Programs In 2015, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act was signed into law. The Act provides transit funding through fiscal year 2020. The FAST Act re-authorized Federal Transit Administration (FTA) programs for improving mobility, increases safety, and streamlines construction and acquisition of capital projects. FTA provides annual formula grants to transit agencies as well as discretionary funding through competitive processes. The federal funding programs that may be considered for a bus facility under the Danbury TOD Project include: Bus & Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5339) The Bus & Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5339) makes federal resources available to states and direct recipients to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus- related facilities including technological changes or innovations to modify low or no emission vehicles or facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 7 Corridor Study Existing Conditions and Trends Technical Memorandum
    Transportation and ROUTE Land Use Study Existing Conditions and Trends Technical Memorandum 6 I-84 Danbury 302 Bethel 7 35 53 Redding 58 Ridgefield 107 102 57 33 Weston Wilton 136 123 106 15 124 33 New 137 Westport Canaan 53 1 104 I-95 Norwalk Prepared for SWRPA and HVCEO HOUSATONIC VALLEY Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. COUNCIL OF E LECTED SSouth WWestern RegionalRPA Planning Agency February 2010 O FFICIALS Route 7 Corridor Study Existing Conditions and Trends Technical Memorandum Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Overview/Regional Context............................................................................... 3 Overview of Memo Organization.......................................................................................... 5 Transportation System and User Profile.................................................................................. 7 Transportation System Network........................................................................................... 7 Transportation System Demand .......................................................................................... 7 Transportation System Choices......................................................................................... 11 Planned and Programmed Projects in the Study Corridor ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EMPLOYEE TIMETABLE Timetable No. 4 Effective February 5, 2006
    EMPLOYEE TIMETABLE Timetable No. 4 Effective February 5, 2006 FOR EMPLOYEES ONLY R. E. Lieblong Senior Vice President – Operations GO 413 (4-10) Employee Timetable INTRODUCTION The Employee Timetable contains four parts, plus Track Charts which are provided for information only. Line Special Instructions contain Line- and Branch-specific information and rules. Each section has a prefix identifying the Line or Branch, and is numbered as shown in the table below. Hudson Line Special Instructions are separated into two sections: • GCT 41 through GCT 48 apply only to the portion of the Hudson Line between GCT and the southerly limit of CP 8 (MP 6.9). • HUD 41 through HUD 48 apply only to the portion of the Hudson Line between the southerly limit of CP 8 (MP 6.9) and Division Post/CSX (MP 75.8), inclusive. Hudson Line New Haven Line New New CP8 CP8 to Branch Branch Branch Branch Canaan Canaan Divison Divison Division Division Danbury Danbury CP 112 to to 112 CP Post/CSX LineHarlem Beacon Line Line Beacon Waterbury Waterbury GCT to CP8 GCT to CP8 Subject Post/Amtrak STATIONS HUD 40 HAR-40 NHV 40 NCN 40 DAN 40 WBY 40 BEA 40 MAX AUTH SPEEDS GCT 41 HUD 41 HAR 41 NHV 41 NCN 41 DAN 41 WBY 41 BEA 41 EQUIP. RESTR. GCT 42 HUD 42 HAR 42 NHV 42 NCN 42 DAN 42 WBY 42 BEA 42 ELECTRICAL OPER. GCT 43 HUD 43 HAR 43 NHV 43 NCN 43 DAN 43 WBY 43 BEA 43 HIGHWAY GRADE GCT 44 HUD 44 HAR 44 NHV 44 NCN 44 DAN 44 WBY 44 BEA 44 CROSSINGS LOCATION OF BULL.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSCOM, Jersey City REGIONAL CONDITIONS REPORT Nov 04, 2012 9:30AM Next Report 1:30PM
    TRANSCOM, Jersey City REGIONAL CONDITIONS REPORT Nov 04, 2012 9:30AM Next Report 1:30PM Bridges & Tunnels MTA Bridges & Tunnels Brooklyn Battery Tunnel MTA Bridges & Tunnels: Weather related on Brooklyn Battery Tunnel both directions Manhattan/Brooklyn Bound (Manhattan/Brooklyn) all lanes closed to traffic until further notice Cross Bay Bridge MTA Bridges & Tunnels: Weather related on Cross Bay Bridge southbound Rockaway Bound (New York) all lanes subject to closure until further notice Northbound ALL lanes are open to traffic. Marine Parkway Bridge MTA Bridges & Tunnels: Weather related on Marine Parkway Bridge both directions Rockaway/Brooklyn Bound (New York) all lanes open to traffic Queens Midtown Tunnel MTA Bridges & Tunnels: Weather related on Queens Midtown Tunnel both directions between Manhattan Side (Manhattan) and Queens Side (New York) all lanes remain closed until further notice NYSDOT - Region 11 Battery Park Underpass NYSDOT - Region 11: Flooding on Battery Park Underpass both directions between FDR Drive (Manhattan) and West Street all lanes blocked until further notice Port Authority NY/NJ George Washington Bridge Port Authority NY/NJ: Police department activity on George Washington Bridge westbound at New Jersey Side/Upper Level (Fort Lee) exit ramp remains closed to Palisades Interstate Parkway Northbound, expect delays until further notice Holland Tunnel Port Authority NY/NJ: Weather related on Holland Tunnel both directions between New Jersey Side - Toll Plaza (Jersey City) and New York Side - South Tube (Manhattan)
    [Show full text]