İli Komisyon Merkez/ Mülhakat Adliye Hizmet Bölgesi Hizmet Puanı

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

İli Komisyon Merkez/ Mülhakat Adliye Hizmet Bölgesi Hizmet Puanı Ek-3-Tüm Adliyelerin Puanlarını Gösterir Tablo Merkez/ Hizmet İli Komisyon Adliye Hizmet Puanı Mülhakat Bölgesi Adana Adana Merkez Adana 1 10 Adana Adana Mülhakat Karaisalı 4 16 Adana Adana Mülhakat Karataş 3 14 Adana Adana Bam Merkez Adana Bam 1 10 Adana Adana BİM Merkez Adana BİM 1 10 Adana Adana BİM Mülhakat Adana İdare 1 10 Hatay Adana BİM Mülhakat Hatay İdare 1 10 Mersin Adana BİM Mülhakat Mersin İdare 1 10 Adıyaman Adıyaman Merkez Adıyaman 2 12 Adıyaman Adıyaman Mülhakat Besni 4 16 Adıyaman Adıyaman Mülhakat Gerger 5 18 Adıyaman Adıyaman Mülhakat Gölbaşı(Adıyaman) 3 14 Adıyaman Adıyaman Mülhakat Kahta 3 14 Afyonkarahisar Afyonkarahisar Merkez Afyonkarahisar 1 10 Afyonkarahisar Afyonkarahisar Mülhakat İscehisar 4 16 Afyonkarahisar Afyonkarahisar Mülhakat Sandıklı 3 14 Afyonkarahisar Afyonkarahisar Mülhakat Sinanpaşa 4 16 Afyonkarahisar Afyonkarahisar Mülhakat Şuhut 4 16 Ağrı Ağrı Merkez Ağrı 3 14 Ağrı Ağrı Mülhakat Eleşkirt 4 16 Ağrı Ağrı Mülhakat Taşlıçay 5 18 Manisa Akhisar Merkez Akhisar 2 12 Manisa Akhisar Mülhakat Gördes 3 14 Manisa Akhisar Mülhakat Kırkağaç 3 14 Manisa Akhisar Mülhakat Soma 2 12 Aksaray Aksaray Merkez Aksaray 1 10 Aksaray Aksaray Mülhakat Eskil 4 16 Aksaray Aksaray Mülhakat Ortaköy(Aksaray) 3 14 Ankara Aksaray Mülhakat Şereflikoçhisar 3 14 Konya Akşehir Merkez Akşehir 2 12 Konya Akşehir Mülhakat Doğanhisar 4 16 Konya Akşehir Mülhakat Ilgın 3 14 Konya Akşehir Mülhakat Yunak 4 16 Antalya Alanya Merkez Alanya 1 10 Antalya Alanya Mülhakat Gazipaşa 3 14 Manisa Alaşehir Merkez Alaşehir 2 12 Manisa Alaşehir Mülhakat Sarıgöl 3 14 Amasya Amasya Merkez Amasya 2 12 Amasya Amasya Mülhakat Gümüşhacıköy 4 16 Amasya Amasya Mülhakat Merzifon 2 12 Amasya Amasya Mülhakat Suluova 3 14 Amasya Amasya Mülhakat Taşova 3 14 Ankara Ankara Mülhakat Akyurt 3 14 Ankara Ankara Merkez Ankara 1 10 Ankara Ankara Mülhakat Bala 3 14 Ankara Ankara Mülhakat Çubuk 2 12 Ankara Ankara Mülhakat Elmadağ 2 12 Ankara Ankara Mülhakat Gölbaşı(Ankara) 1 10 Ankara Ankara Mülhakat Haymana 3 14 Ankara Ankara Mülhakat Kalecik 3 14 Ankara Ankara Mülhakat Polatlı 2 12 Ankara Ankara Bam Merkez Ankara Bam 1 10 Ankara Ankara Batı Merkez Ankara Batı 1 10 Ankara Ankara Batı Mülhakat Beypazarı 2 12 Ankara Ankara Batı Mülhakat Kahramankazan 2 12 1/13 Ek-3-Tüm Adliyelerin Puanlarını Gösterir Tablo Merkez/ Hizmet İli Komisyon Adliye Hizmet Puanı Mülhakat Bölgesi Ankara Ankara Batı Mülhakat Kızılcahamam 2 12 Ankara Ankara Batı Mülhakat Nallıhan 4 16 Ankara Ankara Bim Merkez Ankara Bim 1 10 Ankara Ankara Bim Mülhakat Ankara İdare 1 10 Bolu Ankara Bim Mülhakat Bolu İdare 1 10 Eskişehir Ankara Bim Mülhakat Eskişehir İdare 1 10 Kastamonu Ankara Bim Mülhakat Kastamonu İdare 2 12 Kayseri Ankara Bim Mülhakat Kayseri İdare 1 10 Kırıkkale Ankara Bim Mülhakat Kırıkkale İdare 1 10 Sivas Ankara Bim Mülhakat Sivas İdare 1 10 Yozgat Ankara Bim Mülhakat Yozgat İdare 2 12 Zonguldak Ankara Bim Mülhakat Zonguldak İdare 1 10 Antalya Antalya Merkez Antalya 1 10 Antalya Antalya Mülhakat Kemer 2 12 Antalya Antalya Mülhakat Korkuteli 3 14 Antalya Antalya Bam Merkez Antalya Bam 1 10 Ardahan Ardahan Merkez Ardahan 3 14 Ardahan Ardahan Mülhakat Göle 4 16 Ardahan Ardahan Mülhakat Hanak 5 18 Ardahan Ardahan Mülhakat Posof 5 18 Artvin Artvin Mülhakat Arhavi 3 14 Artvin Artvin Merkez Artvin 3 14 Artvin Artvin Mülhakat Borçka 3 14 Artvin Artvin Mülhakat Hopa 3 14 Artvin Artvin Mülhakat Şavşat 5 18 Artvin Artvin Mülhakat Yusufeli 5 18 Aydın Aydın Merkez Aydın 1 10 Aydın Aydın Mülhakat Çine 3 14 Aydın Aydın Mülhakat Germencik 3 14 Samsun Bafra Mülhakat Alaçam 3 14 Samsun Bafra Merkez Bafra 2 12 İstanbul Bakırköy Merkez Bakırköy 1 10 İstanbul Bakırköy Mülhakat Büyükçekmece 1 10 İstanbul Bakırköy Mülhakat Küçükçekmece 1 10 Balıkesir Balıkesir Merkez Balıkesir 1 10 Balıkesir Balıkesir Mülhakat Bigadiç 3 14 Balıkesir Balıkesir Mülhakat Dursunbey 3 14 Balıkesir Balıkesir Mülhakat İvrindi 3 14 Balıkesir Balıkesir Mülhakat Kepsut 3 14 Balıkesir Balıkesir Mülhakat Savaştepe 3 14 Balıkesir Balıkesir Mülhakat Sındırgı 3 14 Balıkesir Balıkesir Mülhakat Susurluk 3 14 Balıkesir Bandırma Merkez Bandırma 2 12 Balıkesir Bandırma Mülhakat Erdek 2 12 Balıkesir Bandırma Mülhakat Gönen 2 12 Balıkesir Bandırma Mülhakat Manyas 4 16 Balıkesir Bandırma Mülhakat Marmara 4 16 Bartın Bartın Mülhakat Amasra 3 14 Bartın Bartın Merkez Bartın 2 12 Bartın Bartın Mülhakat Ulus 4 16 Batman Batman Merkez Batman 2 12 Batman Batman Mülhakat Kozluk 5 18 Batman Batman Mülhakat Sason 5 18 Bayburt Bayburt Merkez Bayburt 3 14 İzmir Bergama Merkez Bergama 2 12 2/13 Ek-3-Tüm Adliyelerin Puanlarını Gösterir Tablo Merkez/ Hizmet İli Komisyon Adliye Hizmet Puanı Mülhakat Bölgesi İzmir Bergama Mülhakat Dikili 2 12 İzmir Bergama Mülhakat Kınık 3 14 Bilecik Bilecik Merkez Bilecik 2 12 Bilecik Bilecik Mülhakat Bozüyük 2 12 Bilecik Bilecik Mülhakat Gölpazarı 4 16 Bilecik Bilecik Mülhakat Osmaneli 3 14 Bilecik Bilecik Mülhakat Söğüt 3 14 Bingöl Bingöl Merkez Bingöl 3 14 Bingöl Bingöl Mülhakat Genç 4 16 Bingöl Bingöl Mülhakat Karlıova 5 18 Bingöl Bingöl Mülhakat Kiğı 5 18 Bingöl Bingöl Mülhakat Solhan 5 18 Bitlis Bitlis Mülhakat Adilcevaz 4 16 Bitlis Bitlis Mülhakat Ahlat 4 16 Bitlis Bitlis Merkez Bitlis 3 14 Bitlis Bitlis Mülhakat Güroymak 4 16 Bitlis Bitlis Mülhakat Hizan 5 18 Bitlis Bitlis Mülhakat Mutki 5 18 Bitlis Bitlis Mülhakat Tatvan 3 14 Muğla Bodrum Merkez Bodrum 1 10 Muğla Bodrum Mülhakat Milas 2 12 Yozgat Boğazlıyan Merkez Boğazlıyan 3 14 Yozgat Boğazlıyan Mülhakat Çayıralan 4 16 Yozgat Boğazlıyan Mülhakat Sarıkaya 3 14 Bolu Bolu Merkez Bolu 1 10 Bolu Bolu Mülhakat Gerede 2 12 Bolu Bolu Mülhakat Göynük 4 16 Bolu Bolu Mülhakat Mengen 3 14 Bolu Bolu Mülhakat Mudurnu 3 14 Afyonkarahisar Bolvadin Merkez Bolvadin 3 14 Afyonkarahisar Bolvadin Mülhakat Çay 3 14 Afyonkarahisar Bolvadin Mülhakat Emirdağ 3 14 Sinop Boyabat Merkez Boyabat 3 14 Sinop Boyabat Mülhakat Durağan 4 16 Burdur Burdur Mülhakat Bucak 2 12 Burdur Burdur Merkez Burdur 2 12 Burdur Burdur Mülhakat Gölhisar 3 14 Burdur Burdur Mülhakat Tefenni 4 16 Burdur Burdur Mülhakat Yeşilova 4 16 Balıkesir Burhaniye Mülhakat Ayvalık 2 12 Balıkesir Burhaniye Merkez Burhaniye 2 12 Balıkesir Burhaniye Mülhakat Edremit 2 12 Bursa Bursa Merkez Bursa 1 10 Bursa Bursa Mülhakat Gemlik 2 12 Bursa Bursa Mülhakat Karacabey 2 12 Bursa Bursa Mülhakat Keles 4 16 Bursa Bursa Mülhakat Mudanya 2 12 Bursa Bursa Mülhakat Mustafakemalpaşa 2 12 Bursa Bursa Mülhakat Orhaneli 3 14 Bursa Bursa Mülhakat Orhangazi 2 12 Bursa Bursa BAM Merkez Bursa Bam 1 10 Adana Ceyhan Merkez Ceyhan 2 12 Adana Ceyhan Mülhakat Yumurtalık 3 14 Şırnak Cizre Merkez Cizre 3 14 Şırnak Cizre Mülhakat İdil 5 18 3/13 Ek-3-Tüm Adliyelerin Puanlarını Gösterir Tablo Merkez/ Hizmet İli Komisyon Adliye Hizmet Puanı Mülhakat Bölgesi Şırnak Cizre Mülhakat Silopi 3 14 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Ayvacık 3 14 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Bayramiç 3 14 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Biga 2 12 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Çan 3 14 Çanakkale Çanakkale Merkez Çanakkale 1 10 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Ezine 3 14 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Gelibolu 2 12 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Gökçeada 4 16 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Lapseki 3 14 Çanakkale Çanakkale Mülhakat Yenice(Çanakkale) 4 16 Çankırı Çankırı Merkez Çankırı 2 12 Çankırı Çankırı Mülhakat Ilgaz 3 14 Çankırı Çankırı Mülhakat Kurşunlu 4 16 Çankırı Çankırı Mülhakat Şabanözü 4 16 Samsun Çarşamba Merkez Çarşamba 2 12 Samsun Çarşamba Mülhakat Terme 2 12 Tekirdağ Çorlu Mülhakat Çerkezköy 2 12 Tekirdağ Çorlu Merkez Çorlu 1 10 Tekirdağ Çorlu Mülhakat Saray(Çorlu) 3 14 Çorum Çorum Mülhakat Bayat 4 16 Çorum Çorum Merkez Çorum 1 10 Çorum Çorum Mülhakat İskilip 3 14 Çorum Çorum Mülhakat Kargı 4 16 Çorum Çorum Mülhakat Osmancık 3 14 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Acıpayam 3 14 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Buldan 3 14 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Çal 3 14 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Çameli 4 16 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Çardak 3 14 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Çivril 3 14 Denizli Denizli Merkez Denizli 1 10 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Kale 4 16 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Sarayköy 2 12 Denizli Denizli Mülhakat Tavas 3 14 Afyonkarahisar Dinar Mülhakat Dazkırı 4 16 Afyonkarahisar Dinar Merkez Dinar 3 14 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Bismil 4 16 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Çermik 5 18 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Çınar 4 16 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Çüngüş 5 18 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Dicle 5 18 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Merkez Diyarbakır 1 10 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Eğil 5 18 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Ergani 3 14 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Hani 5 18 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Hazro 5 18 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Kulp 5 18 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Lice 5 18 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır Mülhakat Silvan 4 16 Diyarbakır Diyarbakır BAM Merkez Diyarbakır BAM 1 10 Ağrı Doğubayazıt Mülhakat Diyadin 5 18 Ağrı Doğubayazıt Merkez Doğubayazıt 3 14 Düzce Düzce Mülhakat Akçakoca 3 14 Düzce Düzce Merkez Düzce 1 10 4/13 Ek-3-Tüm Adliyelerin Puanlarını Gösterir Tablo Merkez/ Hizmet İli Komisyon Adliye Hizmet Puanı Mülhakat Bölgesi Düzce Düzce Mülhakat Yığılca 4 16 Edirne Edirne Merkez Edirne 1 10 Edirne Edirne Mülhakat Enez 4 16 Edirne Edirne Mülhakat İpsala 3 14 Edirne Edirne Mülhakat Keşan 2 12 Edirne Edirne Mülhakat Uzunköprü 3 14 Tunceli Elazığ Mülhakat Çemişgezek 5 18 Elazığ Elazığ Merkez Elazığ 1 10 Elazığ Elazığ Mülhakat Karakoçan 4 16 Elazığ Elazığ Mülhakat Keban 4 16 Elazığ Elazığ Mülhakat Kovancılar 4 16 Elazığ Elazığ Mülhakat Maden 4 16 Elazığ Elazığ Mülhakat Palu 4 16 Kahramanmaraş Elbistan Mülhakat Afşin 3 14 Kahramanmaraş Elbistan Merkez Elbistan 3 14 Kahramanmaraş Elbistan Mülhakat Göksun 4
Recommended publications
  • Shahidfarooq
    SHAHIDFAROOQ PhD(Weed Science) GaziosmanpasaUniversity,Departmen t of PlantProtection Tokat,Turkey PERSONAL E–MailAddress: [email protected];[email protected] Nationality: Pakistani ACADEMICS Board/Univ. Year Degree Division Maxmarks MarksObtained MajorSubjects GaziosmanpaşaUniv.Tokat,Turkey 2018 PhD 93.1% WeedScience B.Z.Univ.Multan,Pakistan 2012 M.Sc.(Hons) First 4.00CGPA 3.89CGPA Agronomy B.Z.Univ.Multan,Pakistan 2010 B.Sc.(Hons) First 4.00CGPA 3.79CGPA Agriculture B.I.S.E.Multan,Pakistan 2006 F.Sc. First 1100 768 Pre-Medical B.I.S.E.Multan,Pakistan 2003 SSC/Matric First 850 653 Science PhD Thesis: Experimental and Ecological Niche Modelling Approaches to Predict Potential Distribution Areas of Some Invasive Weeds in Turkey M.Sc. (Hons.) Thesis: Mitigating Terminal Drought in Wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) through Seed Enhancement Techniques AREAS OF EXPERTIES ❖ Weed Biology and Ecology ❖ Crop Production under Stressful Environments ❖ Species Distribution Modelling ❖ Climate Change WORK EXPERIENCE i. Worked in a project funded by Bahauddin Zakariya University to improve wheat productivity through seed enhancement techniques under drought stress (part of MSc thesis) ii. Worked as BIDEB-Scholar in the project “Development of Monitoring and Information system for alien plant species in Turkey”. The main duties were to collect and analyze data and develop models for the potential spread of alien species in the country. I used multivariate statistics (CONACO and R software) to correlate the species’ distribution with environment and soil factors. I actively used Geographic Information System (GIS) through ARCGIS and R software to develop models for understanding plant invasion in Turkey under changing climate and other environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Temple States' of Pontus: Comana Pontica and Zela A
    ‘TEMPLE STATES’ OF PONTUS: COMANA PONTICA AND ZELA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY EM İNE SÖKMEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY APRIL 2005 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Numan Tuna Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Asist. Prof. Dr .Deniz Burcu Erciyas Supervisor Examining Committee Members (first name belongs to the chairperson of the jury and the second name belongs to supervisor) Prof. Dr. Suna Güven (METU,AH) Asist. Prof. Dr. Deniz Burcu Erciyas (METU, SA) Asist. Prof. Dr. Jan Krzysztof Bertram (METU, SA) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Emine Sökmen Signature : iii ABSTRACT ‘TEMPLE STATES’ OF PONTUS: COMANA PONTICA AND ZELA Sökmen, Emine M.S., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Asist. Prof. Dr. Deniz Burcu Erciyas April 2005, 68 pages Before the Roman rule in Asia Minor, under the Hellenistic kings, small communities lived independently within areas surrounding temples with local powers.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Orhan AYDIN Rektör DAĞITIM Üniversitemiz Uygulamalı
    Evrak Tarih ve Sayısı: 02.03.2021-9857 T.C. TARSUS ÜNİVERSİTESİ REKTÖRLÜĞÜ Genel Sekreterlik Sayı : E-66676008-051.01-84 02.03.2021 Konu : Kongre Duyurusu DAĞITIM Üniversitemiz Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi ev sahipliğinde, Mersin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi ve Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi işbirliği ile ortaklaşa düzenlenen 08-09 Ekim 2021 tarihleri arasında çevrimiçi olarak gerçekleştirilecek olan “ Uluslararası Dijital İşletme, Yönetim ve İktisat Kongresi (International Digital Business, Management And Economics Congress)’ne ilişkin afiş görseli ekte gönderilmekte olup kongre hakkındaki detaylı bilgilere icdbme2021.tarsus.edu.tr adresinden ulaşılabilecektir. Söz konusu kongrenin kurumunuz ilgili birimlerine ve akademik personeline duyurulması hususunda ; Bilgilerinizi ve gereğini arz ederim. Prof. Dr. Orhan AYDIN Rektör Ek : Afiş (2 Sayfa) Dağıtım : Abdullah Gül Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Adana Alparslan Türkeş Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Adıyaman Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Akdeniz Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Aksaray Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Alanya Hamdullah Emin Paşa Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Amasya Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Anadolu Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Anka
    [Show full text]
  • Περίληψη : Mithridates I Ktistes, C
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Ballesteros Pastor Luis Μετάφραση : Ballesteros Pastor Luis Για παραπομπή : Ballesteros Pastor Luis , "Mithridates I Ktistes", Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=8023> Περίληψη : Mithridates I Ktistes, c. 350 B.C. probably in Cius (Gemlik) - 266 B.C. probably in Amaseia (Amasya). King and founder of the so-called Kingdom of Pontus, ruled 302-266 B.C. Άλλα Ονόματα Mithradates I Ktistes Τόπος και Χρόνος Γέννησης (probably) 350 B.C. – Cios (Gemlik) Τόπος και Χρόνος Θανάτου 266 B.C. – (probably) Amaseia (Amasya) Κύρια Ιδιότητα King and founder of the Kingdom of Pontus 1. Birth-Family Mithridates I Ktistes was born around 350 B.C., probably in Cius (Gemlik).1 His father's identity is a controversial point. A manuscript variant in Diodorus Siculus says that he was Mithridates (II of Cios), but Diodorus and other authors say that he was Ariobarzanes, brother of the former; the second possibility seems more plausible.2 The ancient sources consider that the Pontic dynasty was descendent either from Cyrus the Great, or from Darius I, or from one of the "Seven Persians" which murdered Gaumata.3 Those three options are compatible, for Darius himself was one of the Seven and tried to appear as belonging to the same lineage with Cyrus. This genealogy was an aspect of the Pontic Kings' propaganda, although it may have had a real ground: Darius would have given to his son, Gobrias, the government of the region of Mariandinya, in Bithynia. The daughter of Gobrias would have married with Artabazus, son of Pharnaces, another of the Seven.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical World
    MAPS of the PAUL’SBIBLICAL MISSIONARY JOURNEYS WORLD MILAN VENICE ZAGREB ROMANIA BOSNA & BELGRADE BUCHAREST HERZEGOVINA CROATIA SAARAJEVO PISA SERBIA ANCONA ITALY Adriatic SeaMONTENEGRO PRISTINA Black Sea PODGORICA BULGARIA PESCARA KOSOVA SOFIA ROME SINOP SKOPJE Sinope EDIRNE Amastris Three Taverns FOGGIA MACEDONIA PONTUS SAMSUN Forum of Appius TIRANA Philippi ISTANBUL Amisos Neapolis TEKIRDAG AMASYA NAPLES Amphipolis Byzantium Hattusa Tyrrhenian Sea Thessalonica Amaseia ORDU Puteoli TARANTO Nicomedia SORRENTO Pella Apollonia Marmara Sea ALBANIA Nicaea Tavium BRINDISI Beroea Kyzikos SAPRI CANAKKALE BITHYNIA ANKARA Troy BURSA Troas MYSIA Dorylaion Gordion Larissa Aegean Sea Hadrianuthera Assos Pessinous T U R K E Y Adramytteum Cotiaeum GALATIA GREECE Mytilene Pergamon Aizanoi CATANZARO Thyatira CAPPADOCIA IZMIR ASIA PHRYGIA Prymnessus Delphi Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Mazaka Sardis PALERMO Ionian Sea Athens Antioch Pisidia MESSINA Nysa Hierapolis Rhegium Corinth Ephesus Apamea KONYA COMMOGENE Laodicea TRAPANI Olympia Mycenae Samos Tralles Iconium Aphrodisias Arsameia Epidaurus Sounion Colossae CATANIA Miletus Lystra Patmos CARIA SICILY Derbe ADANA GAZIANTEP Siracuse Sparta Halicarnassus ANTALYA Perge Tarsus Cnidus Cos LYCIA Attalia Side CILICIA Soli Korakesion Korykos Antioch Patara Mira Seleucia Rhodes Seleucia Malta Anemurion Pieria CRETE MALTA Knosos CYPRUS Salamis TUNISIA Fair Haven Paphos Kition Amathous SYRIA Kourion BEIRUT LEBANON PAUL’S MISSIONARY JOURNEYS DAMASCUS Prepared by Mediterranean Sea Sidon FIRST JOURNEY : Nazareth SECOND
    [Show full text]
  • Country Compendium
    Country Compendium A companion to the English Style Guide July 2021 Translation © European Union, 2011, 2021. The reproduction and reuse of this document is authorised, provided the sources and authors are acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The right holders and authors shall not be liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................1 Austria ......................................................................................3 Geography ................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial bodies ............................................................................................................ 4 Legal instruments ........................................................................................................ 5 Government bodies and administrative divisions ....................................................... 6 Law gazettes, official gazettes and official journals ................................................... 6 Belgium .....................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Judicial bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Legal instruments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunamis Observed on and Near the Turkish Coast
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226113643 Tsunamis Observed on and Near the Turkish Coast Article in Natural Hazards · January 2000 DOI: 10.1023/A:1008155117243 CITATIONS READS 91 453 2 authors: Yıldız Altınok Şükrü Ersoy Istanbul University Yildiz Technical University 64 PUBLICATIONS 834 CITATIONS 64 PUBLICATIONS 544 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: TRANSFER View project Acil saha gözlem View project All content following this page was uploaded by Şükrü Ersoy on 08 November 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Natural Hazards 21: 185–205, 2000. 185 © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Tsunamis Observed on and Near the Turkish Coast Y. ALTINOK1 andS. ¸ ERSOY2 1Department of Geophysical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Istanbul, 34850 Avcilar, Istanbul, Turkey; 2Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Istanbul, 34850 Avcilar, Istanbul, Turkey (Received: 21 July 1998; in final form: 6 December 1999) Abstract. For centuries, inhabitants of coastal areas have suffered from the effects of tsunamis. Turkey, with a coastline of 8333 km, has experienced many tsunamis. Historical records reveal that, during the observation period over 3000 years, the coastal and surrounding areas of Turkey have been affected by more than ninety tsunamis. These tended to cluster around the Marmara Sea, the city of Istanbul and the gulfs of Izmit, Izmir, Fethiye and Iskenderun. Each of the tsunami occurrences surveyed in this paper deserves further individual study. The most extensive available information concerns the tsunamis associated with the Istanbul Earthquakes of 1509 and 1894, the Eastern Mar- mara Earthquake in 1963 and that of Izmit in 1999, which disturbed the Marmara Sea; the Earthquake of 1939 in Erzincan in eastern Anatolia; and the 1968 Bartın Earthquake, which affected Fatsa and Amasra on the Black Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • İlçe Adı Ve Kodu
    İlçe Adı ve Kodu İlçe Kodu İl Adı İlçe Adı 1104 ADANA SEYHAN 1219 ADANA CEYHAN 1329 ADANA FEKE 1437 ADANA KARAİSALI 1443 ADANA KARATAŞ 1486 ADANA KOZAN 1580 ADANA POZANTI 1588 ADANA SAİMBEYLİ 1687 ADANA TUFANBEYLİ 1734 ADANA YUMURTALIK 1748 ADANA YÜREĞİR 1757 ADANA ALADAĞ 1806 ADANA İMAMOĞLU 2032 ADANA SARIÇAM 2033 ADANA ÇUKUROVA 1105 ADIYAMAN MERKEZ 1182 ADIYAMAN BESNİ 1246 ADIYAMAN ÇELİKHAN 1347 ADIYAMAN GERGER 1354 ADIYAMAN GÖLBAŞI 1425 ADIYAMAN KAHTA 1592 ADIYAMAN SAMSAT 1985 ADIYAMAN SİNCİK 1989 ADIYAMAN TUT 1108 AFYONKARAHİSAR MERKEZ 1200 AFYONKARAHİSAR BOLVADİN 1239 AFYONKARAHİSAR ÇAY 1267 AFYONKARAHİSAR DAZKIRI 1281 AFYONKARAHİSAR DİNAR 1306 AFYONKARAHİSAR EMİRDAĞ 1404 AFYONKARAHİSAR İHSANİYE 1594 AFYONKARAHİSAR SANDIKLI 1626 AFYONKARAHİSAR SİNANPAŞA 1639 AFYONKARAHİSAR SULTANDAĞI 1664 AFYONKARAHİSAR ŞUHUT 1771 AFYONKARAHİSAR BAŞMAKÇI 1773 AFYONKARAHİSAR BAYAT 1809 AFYONKARAHİSAR İSCEHİSAR 1906 AFYONKARAHİSAR ÇOBANLAR 1923 AFYONKARAHİSAR EVCİLER 1944 AFYONKARAHİSAR HOCALAR 1961 AFYONKARAHİSAR KIZILÖREN 1111 AĞRI MERKEZ 1283 AĞRI DİYADİN 1287 AĞRI DOĞUBAYAZIT 1301 AĞRI ELEŞKİRT 1379 AĞRI HAMUR 1568 AĞRI PATNOS 1667 AĞRI TAŞLIÇAY 1691 AĞRI TUTAK 1134 AMASYA MERKEZ 1363 AMASYA GÖYNÜCEK 1368 AMASYA GÜMÜŞHACIKÖY 1524 AMASYA MERZİFON 1641 AMASYA SULUOVA 1668 AMASYA TAŞOVA 1938 AMASYA HAMAMÖZÜ 1130 ANKARA ALTINDAĞ 1157 ANKARA AYAŞ 1167 ANKARA BALA 1187 ANKARA BEYPAZARI 1227 ANKARA ÇAMLIDERE 1231 ANKARA ÇANKAYA 1260 ANKARA ÇUBUK 1302 ANKARA ELMADAĞ 1365 ANKARA GÜDÜL 1387 ANKARA HAYMANA 1427 ANKARA KALECİK 1473 ANKARA KIZILCAHAMAM 1539
    [Show full text]
  • ETHNIC SURVIVAL, NATIONALISM and FORCED MIGRATION the Historical Demography of the Greek Community of Asia Minor at the Close of the Ottoman Era
    ETHNIC SURVIVAL, NATIONALISM AND FORCED MIGRATION The historical demography of the Greek community of Asia Minor at the close of the Ottoman era Introductory An important new trend in Ottoman studies focuses on the historical demography of the Ottoman Empire. A number of scholars have attempt­ ed in recent years to reconstruct the evolution of the population in various parts and provinces of the Empire. The great interest of these studies consists in the new documentation they bring to light from the non-generally accessible Ottoman archives'. The historical demography of more recent times, especially of the nineteenth century, can be doc ­ umented on the basis of official censuses and other population regis­ ters2 . Both the interests of the researchers and the character of the We wish to acknowledge our gratitude to Professor Speros Vryonis, Jr., of the University of California, Los Angeles, for his encouragement and his valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Professor Justin McCarthy, who origi­ nally suggested the idea of this article, also made useful comments on earlier drafts. 1. Ömer Bärkan, «Essai sur les données statistiques des registres de recense­ ment dans l’empire ottoman aux XVe et XVIe siècles», Journal of the Economie and Social History of the Orient, vol. I, no 1 (1957), pp. 9-36, on the Ottoman censuses of 1520-1535 and 1570-1580. See also M. A. Cook, Population pressure in rural Anatolia, 1450- 1600, London 1972 and Ronald C. Jennings, «Urban Population in Anatolia in the Sixteenth Century: A Study of Kayseri, Karaman, Amasya, Trabzon and Erzurum», International Journal of Middle East Studies, voi.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    This PDF is a simplified version of the original article published in Internet Archaeology. All links also go to the online version. Please cite this as: Atalan Çayırezmez, N., Hacigüzeller, P. and Kalayci, T. 2021 Archaeological Digital Archiving in Turkey, Internet Archaeology 58. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.20 Archaeological Digital Archiving in Turkey Nurdan Atalan Çayırezmez, Piraye Hacıgüzeller and Tuna Kalayci Summary This article provides a brief overview of archaeological digital archiving in Turkey. It introduces the legal framework and the stakeholders involved in conducting archaeological excavations and surveys. The current situation in archiving born-digital and digitised documentation produced during archaeological fieldwork is then introduced. Existing repositories serving as hubs for archaeological and heritage archiving are listed and briefly discussed. Analysis of online publishing practices for archaeological digital resources points to an eclectic landscape that only minimally complies with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. We conclude that guidelines for best practice in metadata and semantic technologies, locally applicable standards (especially controlled vocabularies), technical know-how, and a larger acceptance of open data and scholarship remain much-needed assets for archaeological digital archiving in Turkey. We also conclude that the future promises progress towards more interoperable archaeological digital archives thanks to international training, network and knowledge transfer opportunities (e.g. SEADDA Project). 1. Archaeology in Turkey All immovable and movable cultural assets in the Republic of Turkey are state property whose protection is ensured by the Turkish State under the Constitution (Constitution of the Republic of Turkey, 1982, Article 63). Definitions of immovable and movable cultural assets are stipulated in the Law on the Conservation of Cultural and Natural Property (No.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Virtue from Necessity in the Urban Waterworks of Roman Asia Minor Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vt9c4f4 Author Bricker, Brianna Lynn Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Virtue from Necessity in the Urban Waterworks of Roman Asia Minor A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of Art and Architecture by Brianna Lynn Bricker Committee in charge: Professor Fikret K. Yegül, Chair Professor Swati Chattopadhyay Professor Christine M. Thomas June 2016 The dissertation of Brianna Lynn Bricker is approved: ____________________________________________ Swati Chattopadhyay ____________________________________________ Christine M. Thomas ____________________________________________ Fikret K. Yegül, Committee Chair June 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Damlaya damlaya göl olur “Drop by drop, a lake will form,” goes the Turkish proverb. And so went this dissertation project: little by little quotidian efforts turned into something larger. But these drops, in fact, were not just my own efforts, nor were they always quotidian. The number of drops contributed by others is incalculable, but the impact is clear. Special thanks go to my advisor Fikret Yegül for his unwavering support and kindness throughout my graduate school experience. I also thank Diane Favro for her continual warmth and helpfulness. I am deeply thankful for my other committee members, Swati Chattopadhyay and Christine Thomas, for providing important outside perspectives and challenging me to go farther with my work. I am truly grateful for my community at UCSB: firstly, the Department of the History of Art and Architecture, for the support and space to grow as a scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarsan 2018 Sempozyumu Bildiri Özetleri Kitabi
    ANARSAN 2018 SEMPOZYUMU BİLDİRİ ÖZETLERİ KİTABI ANARSAN 2018 SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS 08-09 Ekim 2018 ÇORUM Onur Kurulu Necmeddin KILIÇ (Çorum Valisi) Reha Metin ALKAN (Hitit Üniversitesi Rektörü) Zeki GÜL (Çorum Belediye Başkanı) Düzenleme Kurulu Asuman ÇIRAK Ayşegül ŞARBAK Ersin ÇELİKBAŞ Esra KESKİN Mustafa Tolga ÇIRAK Ömer Faruk AKMEŞE Özlem SİR GAVAZ Şahin YILDIRIM Vahdet ÖZKOÇAK Bilim Kurulu Abdullah Şevki DUYMAZ (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi) Abdülkadir DÜNDAR (Ankara Üniversitesi) Ali Akın AKYOL (Gazi Üniversitesi) Andreas SCHACHNER (German Archaeological Institute) Arzu DEMİREL (Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi) Asuman BALDIRAN (Selçuk Üniversitesi) Asuman ÇIRAK (Hitit Üniversitesi) Aygül SÜEL (Ankara Üniversitesi) Aykut ÇINAROĞLU (Ankara Üniversitesi) Ayşegül ŞARBAK (Hitit Üniversitesi) Berna ALPAGUT (Ankara Üniversitesi) Bülent İŞLER (Gazi Üniversitesi) Bülent ŞENOCAK (Bozok Üniversitesi) Candan ÜLKÜ (Mersin Üniversitesi) David ALBA (Institut Catala de Paleontologia) Demet TAŞKAN (Bozok Üniversitesi) E. Emine Naza DÖNMEZ (İstanbul Üniversitesi) Emre DEMİR (Hitit Üniversitesi) Engin YILDIRIM (Hitit Üniversitesi) Erdal ESER (Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi) Eric Luc JEAN (Hitit Üniversitesi) Ersin ÇELİKBAŞ (Karabük Üniversitesi) Ertekin Mustafa DOKSANALTI (Selçuk Üniversitesi) Esra KESKİN (Hitit Üniversitesi) Fatih MÜDERRİSOĞLU (Hacettepe Üniversitesi) Galip AKIN (Bozok Üniversitesi) Gülgün KÖROĞLU (Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi) Hacer ÇORUH (Harran Üniversitesi) Hacer SANCAKTAR (Bozok Üniversitesi) Handan ÜSTÜNDAĞ (Anadolu Üniversitesi)
    [Show full text]