A Ten Year Ten~Year Perspective

A TEN YEAR TEN~YEAR PERSPECTIVE

Richard Alpert/Ram Dass

Adapted from a talk given August 7.1982 on the occasion of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Association for Trans personal Psychology, held at Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove , California.

I tried to think about the last 10 years, but I can hardly remember yesterday. When that first started to happen, I wondered if I was taking too many drugs, but then I noticed remembering that when I needed something in memory it was there, and the so I started to trust this state of not thinking at all-just kind last of an empty mind out of which something comes and you ten just get to trust it. The predicament is that, as you let go of years personal history, each moment becomes richer and more thick with meaning. Both future and past start to lose their power. You can have plans and memories, but they don't seem to have the same pull.

A couple of years ago I found I had been moving memorabilia with me everywhere I went. It's those things one would keep in an attic or cellar. Mine were in boxes and I would pay the parcel service to move them every time I

*The author, also known as Ram Dass, was first published in the Journal, 1970,2 & 1971, I, with an article based on his lectures at the Menninger Foundation. Subsequent Journal articles include: Ram Dass lecture at the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center: Part I (1973, I); Part II (1973,2); Advice to a psychotherapist (1975, I): Freeing the mind (1976, 2); On lay monasticism (with Brother David Steindl-Rast, 1977,2). He is also known through his books which include Be Here Now (1972); The Only Dance There Is (1974); Grist for the Mill (1976); Journey of Awakening (1977); Miracle of Love (1979).

The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1982, Vol, 14, No.2 171 would move. When you're a wandering 'Sadhu' with a whole parcel fleet behind you, it's quite a trip. I noticed that I never opened the boxes. I just kept adding to them, assum ing that the time would come when I would run out of the present moment, in which case I could revel in the past. But I was getting to be able to be fulfilled in the present moment by less and less until I could just sit in an empty room and be happy. But I had old love letters and important memorabilia of the 60's and things one must hold onto-pictures of people I'd never see again, my Bar Mitzvah certificate that said I was a man. Not things to be taken lightly!

At first I decided to throw them away, but I found myself during the night going out to the garbage pail because I burning couldn't bear to get rid of one picture. So I decided to have a personal big fire and burn them all. And I did. I started out laughing, history but by the second day it was really starting to get to me. My guru had said, "It's good to burn bodies because then the beings don't keep wanting to come back to them." So I thought it was good to burn that personal history. But it turned out someone was doing a movie of me those few days, so it's all on film. It's like microfilming one's history except it's his film, not mine, so now my Karma is his and I'm free. I don't ever have to look at it again.

David McClelland, who was my boss at Harvard (he actu ally fired me and we've remained good friends over the not years), is convinced I haven't changed at all. This is ex changing] tremely discouraging since he's a social psychologist. I've changing been working all these years trying to change, and he says, "You're the same as you always were." I figure, "What does he know?" But I have changed, inside, although I'm not an enlightened being. Perhaps I am at some level, but I'm not fully consciously an enlightened being. I'm actually sort of a mouth for a process that many of us are sharing.

A year ago I was 50 years old. I've always gone to motels on my birthday because I don't like that kind of hysterical fun that people usually have at calendar celebrations. But this time was my 50th birthday and I wanted to see if there was something to realty enjoy and learn. So I called some people and had three parties, one on television in New York with a big birthday cake. But no matter how I milked it, I couldn't quite feel that I was any age. I have a 50-year-old body, a 1931model decaying perfectly lawfully, and so I was really celebrating the age of my vehicle. Yet, on one plane, I'm hundreds of thousands of years old. Or else I'm newly born. You can take your choice. It feels like all and everything.

172 The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1982, Vol. 14, No.2 Ten years ago I was very caught in specialness, I was what I now would call a "phony holy." I was busy trying to be high for me and everybody else. I assumed that everybody wanted me to be high all the time so I would prepare my self to be high in front of everybody. There's a certain way you are when you're high. You smile a lot, you're very benevolent - it's the holy man role. I took all the parts of me that didn't fit into that role and shoved them under the rug so that I could be who everybody wanted me to be. I wanted to be that, too. I really wanted to be Ram Dass.

You see, I had what was called vertical schizophrenia. I even had a name to go with each of my personalities, Dick personalities Alpert and Ram Dass. Ram Dass would sit in front of a and group of people and look out and maybe just love everybody identities and wanted nothing. Dick Alpert was counting the house. Worse than that, Dick Alpert was impersonating Ram Dass. Somebody would come up and say, "Oh, Ram Dass, thank you for your writings!" and I'd hear Ram Dass say, "Wouldn't you like to come up and see my holy pictures?" Well, that may seem funny to you, but what I felt was just a tremendous amount of hypocrisy, being What everybody wanted me to be. You see, what happened was that the spiritual identity played right into my hands psychologi cally. Psychologically there were whole parts of my being that I was afraid of and didn't accept. I had a justification for getting rid of them by becoming holy, and I was using my spiritual journey psychodynamically in order to get free of things that I couldn't acknowledge in myself. But after a while I began to feel as if I was standing on sand. I had to live with my own horror, and the predicament was that I was trying to live in the projection that other people were creating for me. But every now and then I had to be alone, and when I was alone I'd go into very deep depressions which I hid.

My theory was that if I did my Sadhana hard enough, if I meditated deeply enough, if I opened my heart in devotional from practices wide enough, all that unacknowledged stuff would dualism go away. But it didn't, and it has taken me years to under to stand what the teaching was in all of this. I was busy going non from the two into the one . . . from dualism into noo dualism dualism, from the multiplicity into unity. All yogic tech niques are designed for that purpose; Yoga means union. I could huff and puff in pranayam, control my breath to go into a trance state, and in that trance state all of Dick Alpert would be gone completely. But I always came down again, and down had a pejorative connotation for me. I kept want-

A Ten- Year Perspective 173 ing to get high. I didn't want to come down. But I indeed did keep coming down, even with Yoga techniques.

Now in the course of the years I've developed a lot of very strange friends, and one of them is a being named Emanuel. He is interesting because he doesn't have a body. He's a being on another plane and he speaks through a woman on this plane. Some might have a difficult time accepting my friend Emanuel, saying they have no prejudices about color, sex, or religion. But bodies ... somehow if somebody doesn't have a body, you immediately don't know that you want to accept them.

But that's not a problem for me because he's my friend and the way I figure it, I'll take my teachings anywhere I can get them. Emanuel had a teaching. One of the things he said to a us was, "You are here because you chose to be here be teacher cause this is a learning place. Each lifetime is a wonderful without opportunity to expand your consciousness and to move a closer, ever closer, to your oneness with God. This happens body in very small stages. First oneness with self, oneness with the human community, then oneness with God. It cannot be done in one blinding flash. It would be too incomprehensible ... too confusing. So be patient.

"When we choose to come back, we construct an embryo to hold within us the areas of distortion that we need to work on. Then we choose our finite environment to act as a catalyst to bring out these areas. So you were where you needed to be as a very small child.

"So accept the distortions in you. Because when you accept accepting them you can transform them. That's what life is about. distortions You're here to find these areas of imperfection, to under stand them, to love them, and to educate them into reality, which is truth, light, love. "If in the transitional period you find things in yourself that are not perfect, don't blame yourself, celebrate." When I said to him, "Emanuel, what work do 1have to do now?" he said, "Ram Dass, you're in a school, why don't you try taking the curriculum? You took a human birth. You're so busy being holy ... why don't you try being human?"

Funny, I'd never thought of that. Somehow being human meant less than perfect. Even though I intellectually knew that "form is no other than formless and formless is no other than form," I knew that the manifestation was God made manifest. Everything was perfect out there except me. But original sin was going to have a last stronghold right here

174 The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 1982. Vol. 14, No.2 with me. Now I had steeped myself in a Hindu tradition of renunciation, which could produce liberated beings, but often just produces horny celibates, and it kept reinforcing my denigration of personality. So, I said, "Okay, Emanuel, here I go." I decided I'd just go and be human. Now, I'd just already anticipated this. I remember being drunk with Alan go and Watts in a Benedictine monastery one night years ago, and be at three in the morning Alan said, "You know, the trouble human with you, Dick ..... (you know you're going to get real truth at a moment like that) ... "you're too attached to emptiness. "

So with Alan and Emanuel looking over my shoulder I'd already figured out that as long as I pushed anything in the being universe away I wasn't going to be free. I also saw that the free game wasn't just getting high; the game was to be free, and includes free included the highs and the lows. Free included it all ... highs "all and everything" as Ourdjieff would say. There is also and that lovely line of G, Manley Hall - "he who knows not that lows the Prince of Darkness is but the other face of the King of Light knows not me ... ." says God.

Emanuel said, "If you want to be free, you're going to have to embrace original sin. You're going to have to incorporate the darkness into the light." I'd been through years of psychoanalysis, and what I had done was to invest so much reality in my neuroses there wasn't a chance they were going to go away. The analyst thought my neuroses were real because his were real, so we just kept reinforcing the reality of our identities. How could I be other than a patient? He was a doctor. There was only room for two of us in the room.

So these past few years I found myself opening up to rela tionship and I was like a post-pubescent. I found myself non sitting in the bathtub crying with jealous rage. I couldn't attachment believe it! I thought, "This couldn't be me." I said, "My and God, Ram Dass, what are you doing? How absurd!" And dissociation there was this part of me that was giggling. And I was crying and the pain was excruciating. Now, there's something called non-attachment and there's a psychodynamic called dissociation. One often masquerades as the other. So while I was busy being non-attached, I'd say, "This depression ... hal hal ha!" It looked like non-attachment, but actually, it was dissociation.

But by the time I started to open up to my personality, I had developed something inside of me that was very deep, a thing called the witness, as in Ouspensky's, In Search of the

A Ten-Year Perspective 175 Miraculous. The witness is just another part of your ego. It's just one part looking at the other part, Finally, however, you witness the witness, a meditative technique in which you turn in on yourself. Behind all of that there's just a place ... you can't even call it a place. It's like sky. It just develops. It's a context, a frame of reference, of "isness." It doesn't have any quality to it. You can't say it's happy or sad or watchful. It's not looking, but it's seeing. It just is. It's the Tao. It's the Way. I was there when I opened to my personality content. I was no longer holding onto that space, but it was still there. It was there along with the pain.

At that point a friend called me-and he was somebody I'd worked with-and I said, "Gee, you sound wonderful. Why going are you so wonderful?" He said, "I'm in therapy." And I into said, "Is it good?" And he said, 'Yes, wonderful." I asked, therapy "What's the name of your therapist?" He told me, and I thought, "Well, I think I'll do that." I called the therapist and said, "I want some of what you sell." I hired him and we worked together. I was in Jungian analysis .... People say, "You? Ram Dass in therapy?" Why not? And it was extraordinarily useful. But I did have those initial thoughts of, "Well, I'll be able to help him."

Something that is still becoming more clear to me is the movement from knowing the world through conceptual knowing structures and knowing it "intuitively." I have felt that the intuitively problems that we kept creating with our rational minds were only going to be solved by our intuitive connection to the universe. I felt this about nuclear energy, most of the ways in which technology has taken us, the problems of the eco sphere on which we are dependent, and our human relations. I kept looking for ways to connect with that deeper and deeper part of my being that just knows. It knows because it is. In that intuitive domain everything in the universe is subject, and when I'm in my analytic conceptual mind, the universe is object, always one thought away from where the action is.

So I could see that my thinking mind was an instrument-it reinforced my sense of separateness. I didn't want to get rid of my thinking mind, but I wanted to have it around like, "Hey, you, I need you." I wanted to change it from a master into a servant. It's very hard to rationally think through everything. It's awfully complicated.

An example of this occurred a year and a half ago in Benares, India-the city of death. A friend and I were going to the bathing "ghats," to the sacred bathing area in the

176 The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1982, Vol. 14. No, 2 Ganges river where you can bathe with all of the floating dead bodies and things. Benares is a very auspicious place to die. As we were going there we passed about 100or 125 lepers and they all had begging bowls and we shared our a coins, my friend and I. I had about 20 coins of different lesson denominations and there were 125lepers. So I started down in the line. Who am I going to give coins to? Now my rational Be nares mind thinks, that fellow is missing his arms, that's worth 50 paisa, but that woman has her face eaten way. Do you suppose that's worth a rupee? Can you hear how ghastly those thoughts were because I only had 20 coins and there were 125 lepers. And I did this for about three coins. I'm using a grotesque example, but life is pretty grotesque. Finally, Ijust gave up. I shifted to intuitive, and went down the line looking people in the eye and every now and then handed someone a coin. I was suddenly enjoying being with all these beings and I didn't get into guilt and judgment which would have just destroyed the moment. It turns out they have a union. They share all their coins. I didn't know that, so the lesson was a great one for me.

I have been opening to my intuitive way of doing things, and I just respond much more whimsically without any reason for doing it particularly.

"Sure, I'll do this." "I won't do that"~"Why? I don't know."- Well, shouldn't you?"-"No." If you can stand that original confrontation ... "I mean, You're not being rational"-"No."-"You mean you trust?-But do you know you know'-"No."-"And you still trust?" "Yes."-"Well, I don't know." This is the dialogue you have with yourself, actually. It can get extraordinarily excit ing and you say, "Well, here we go. I'm going on intuition."

But the problem that I ran into for some years was that the doorway to the intuition is through the human heart, and I dealing was trying to leap into cosmic love without dealing with with emotionality because emotionality was a little too human for emotionality me. What I experienced was that I had pushed away my humanity to embrace my divinity. When I wanted to be intuitive, the intuition, the impeccable warrior intuitive ac tion, had to come from a blending of humanity and divinity. Until I could accept my humanity fully, my intuitions weren't going to be fully in harmony with the way of things. When I went into my sixth Chakra, everything looked abso lutely perfect. I could look at suffering and see the way in which it was grace. I could see death as grace. It was a place that was clear, but with that clarity there was no warmth. If someone fell down in front of me I could say, "Karma." But

A Ten- Year Perspective 177 when I come down into my human heart, it would hurt so bad because I opened to the suffering of the universe. The easiest way to handle it is to go up. It's much harder to stay down and stay open. It's excruciating.

I began to feel that my freedom was going to lie in the creative tension of being able to see simultaneously perfec tion and also to experience pain; to see that there was nothing to do and yet to work as hard as I could to relieve suffering; to see it was all a dream and still live within the reality of it. My present work is to get into the fullness of the human heart. People used to say, "We love you and we think you're beautiful and very clear, but we don't trust you." They would say they didn't trust me because they couldn't feel my heart, my humanness. There's an image of the a Buddha statue with a tiny smile at the edge of the lips and smile it's known as "the smile of unbearable compassion." It's a of way in which you can open to the horrible beauty of it all. unbearable You can bear it, not by deadening yourself, but by balanc compassion ing.

Over the years my faith has gotten deeper . . . not the beliefs, because beliefs aren't going to keep you warm on a cold night. The faith ... the connection to that which you are at the deepest level, to the universe, to the oneness of all things ... as that faith gets deeper and deeper, then you can dramatically, much more freely, throw yourself into life.

As long as the faith flickers, you've got to be very tentative about the way you go into life because you're always afraid you're going to lose your connection to the spirit. But when that faith is really strong, you can say, "Here I come! In the past few years ... people come up and say, "You know, Ram Dass, you're really just human." It was interesting that psychologically the whole game of communication changed for me. It's a big one, embracing humanity-not embracing humanity. Embracing my humanity.

Almost 10 years ago I met this Tibetan rascal named Chogyam Trungpa, Rimpoche, in Brooklyn. He's a Tantrist and you never know what they're doing. For example, he just looked like a drunk, but you never know because that's what a tantrist might want to look like. So a few days after our initial meeting he was speaking up in Vermont and I stopped by. He was speaking on Don Juan and I thought I could sneak in and sit in the back. But somebody told me, "Trungpa wants to see you." Great. So I was brought into this room with one table, one saki bottle, one glass, and one chair, and he was sitting in it. So I knelt in front of him and

178 The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1982. Vol. 14, No.2 he looked at me and said, "Ram Dass, we have to accept responsibility." What would you do with an opening gambit like that? So I said, "What responsibility? Rimpoche, God has all of the responsibility. I don't have any responsibility. Not my but thy will, Oh Lord." He said, "You're copping out." Then we turned to other conversation. but that state ment stuck in my craw.

But recently Emanuel said to me, "Ram Dass, you really have a choice of whether you want to be the victim or the creator." If you look at yourself, you have a body. You have a personality. You have senses. These are all lawful. They all work by law. Everything in form is lawful. Even thoughts are form and they are lawful, It's all working fine. It's all just flowing and unfolding and the laws of Karma are working perfectly, and in that sense it's just all happening to you. And as long as you identify with forms you experience yourself as being a victim. It could be expressed as, "Poor me, look at what's happened! Look at the world I'm living in! Look at what's been foisted on me. If I didn't have this beauty mark I'd be ... whatever."

But Emanuel said, "Ram Dass, there's a part of you that created this whole business. Why don't you accept the responsibility?" Now at the worst level that is reinterpreted accepting as affirmation, because if I'm the creator then I can have a responsibility fine automobile. But it isn't the ego that's the creator. The ego is part of the creation. In fact, everything that you can label and point to in yourself isn't the creator and yet you are. So the first step was accepting the responsibility for the way things are. Truly. Which raised the interesting possibil ity that I was exactly as I should be at this moment. I wasn't three steps behind, feeling if I hurried I could catch up. Some of you must know that feeling. "I'm really schlock phony, but if I get to work, I'll clean it up and then I'll be who I really ... ." and you keep holding these models of how you're supposed to be. So accepting responsibility means that I accept the responsibility for the creation of what I am, and at the same time I also am the creation. I am the creator and that which is created. As long as I identify only with tile creation I feel victimized. As long as I identify only with the creator I have no form.

To go back to the point where I said I started out feeling very special, I was busy holding on to a myth about myself, a scenario about myself: "Dick Alpert thrown out of Har vard, drugs, Yoga, Guru games . . . ," what will happen next? It's very "somebody-ish." Then I decided that really the game was to become "nobody." So I went into nobody

A Ten-Year Perspective 179 training, giving lectures "Nothing New by Nobody Spe cial." But I was a little bit like the janitor in the Temple. The rabbi was "dovening," and he fell down on his knees cry ing, "Oh , God, I'm nothing, I'm nothing, I'm nothing," and so the Cantor came along and he saw the Rabbi doing that and so he fell on his knees and he said, "I'rn nothing ... I'm nothing." And the janitor came along and he saw them doing this and he knelt down and started crying, "I'm noth ing, I'm nothing," and the Rabbi nudges the Cantor and says, "So look who's being nothing!" So I was going to be nobody special like the big boys. But there's a sneaky "somebodiness" in there.

I grew up at a time when the biggest thing was to be inde pendent. One moved away from home. Visiting my father or family family when I was trying to stay conscious, I used to last relations about 20 seconds. I'd come in as the Buddha and after a question like, "What are you doing for a living";" I'd lose my consciousness into reactivity. But I'd think, "I'm going to take on the hot fires, so I'm going to love my father." So, "Here I am, Dad, I love you." But he smelled a rat. He knew. Now it's better.I really enjoy extended family, and I really love to be with my father. We hang out, we play Yahtzee, and we watch the ball game. Does the spirit man ifest only in Om mani padme hum? Isn't Yahtzee as much divine spirit as anything else? It's a way of being with another being.

When I started to open the door to the extended family, an interesting thing developed. Ten years ago I was always trying to get "juice" from young people. That's where the energy and the movements were. That's where the action was, where the spiritual change in the world was going to a happen. I was sort of the uncle to a certain group of people delicious that were going to make it happen. But even way back I sign began to see signs that it wasn't the way I thought it was. I kept ignoring them, even one delicious sign. At a time when everybody that came to my audience were always the same age, they all dressed a certain way; they all wore white, had smiles and had flowers and loved everybody. Now I think they were real repressed. This one night they were all there smiling and I assumed everybody had had acid, and I was talking far out talk that those 'who knew' would understand. In the front row there was a woman who was about 70. She had a hat on with strawberries and cherries and things, and she had a black patent leather bag, a print dress and respon sible oxfords. I'd say outrageous things and she'd nod in knowing agreement. I'd think, "How does she know? Well, this is not an acid head." I just kept watching her as I'd say

180 The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1982, Vol. 14, No.2 more outrageous things, and she'd nod again. At the end of the lecture she came up and said, "Oh, thank you. Every thing you said just made perfect sense, and it was just so clear." I said, "How do you know all that? What do you do that gets you into the position of consciousness that you know all that?" She leaned forward very conspiratorially and she said, "I crochet."

The past few years I have begun to feel this great affinity to an the elders of the society. Henry Amiel said, "To know how affinity to grow old is a masterwork of wisdom, one of the most to the difficult chapters in the great art of living." elders

Longfellow: "For age is opportunity no less than youth itself, though in another dress, and as the evening twilight fades away, the sky is filled with stars invisible by day."

This is a lovely thing that I actually got from one of Ken Dychwald's articles. In a poem by Jenny Joseph:

When I am an old woman, I shall wear purple with a red hat which doesn't go and doesn't suit me and I shall spend my pension on brandy and summer gloves and satin sandals and say. "We've no money for butter." I shall sit down on the pavement when I'm tired and gobble up samples in shops and press alarm bells and run my stick along the public railings and make up for the sobriety of my youth. I shall go out in my slippers in the rain, pick the flowers in other people's gardens, and learn to spit.

You can wear terrible shirts and grow more fat and eat three pounds of sausage at a go with only bread and a pickle for a week and hoard pens and pencils and beer mats and things in boxes. But now we must have clothes that keep us dry and pay the rent and not swear in the street and set a good example for the children. We must have friends to dinner and read the papers. But maybe I ought to practice a little now so people who know me are not too shocked and surprised when suddenly I am old and start to wear purple,"

So, as I started to try to integrate the deeper parts of my delighting inner being, I found that my inner being was acknowledging in the a much broader spectrum of the universe than my habitual elders separate self was. And I was suddenly beginning to delight in the elders as well as young people.

What I'm experiencing is listening more carefully to my body, to my heart and my mind. And the more I go inside and listen, the more the inside and the outside are one. And it's interesting that the more I try to get myself together without the intellectual overlay of" I must honor my incar-

A Ten- Year Perspective 181 nation," the more I find myself involved in social action. I don't find myself involved in social action out of urgency or to be fear. I feel I am a member of society. I feel I must vote. free There's not even a question about it. When something and doesn't feel right. I must speak up about it not feeling right fully because that's my responsibility, and my silence is also my involved vote. I'm beginning to see that I am only going to be free when I'm fully involved in the world. A strange insight for me.

For a long time I was so busy being holy I had no time for aesthetics. So my cello just sat in the closet. Now I'm playing string quartets again and not only is it okay, but I feel like I'm in the spirit, and a group of us play harpsichord and recorder and cello .... We're hoping to play in old folks' homes in New Mexico.

And there is a change related to all the work I've done with dying-the dying centers and the dying project, really keep ing death on my left shoulder, just opening to it by acknowl edging and living with death. Now I'm learning to live with life. A new one for me. I'm also learning to honor my body. I see that I haven't really been in my body fully. And I have work to do in my body and with my heart. It's all going just fine, and I'm very patient.

Ten years ago I used to be counting, "How soon 'till get enlightened?" Now I've developed patience. It's not de spair. It's patience. It's rooted in hopelessness. My attach ment to where I was going was getting in the way of being. The third Chinese patriarch says, "Even to be attached to enlightenment is to go astray."

It is said that the truth waits for eyes unclouded by longing. As you become quiet-quiet in faith and quiet in what is, quiet in the fullness of the moment-you begin to hear closer and closer to the truth. And in that hearing, or out of that hearing, comes action that happens in harmony with the way of things, and your unique manifestation expresses itself. You become a perfect statement of God made man ifest through you.

No longer am I trying to Imitate anyone else. I'm Dick Alpert and I'm a perfect Dick Alpert. I listen from moment to moment, and what I hear changes, and I find that I can't be afraid of being inconsistent if I'm going to listen to truth and allow my uniqueness to manifest. Now I listen and I do what intuitively I must do. I begin to trust myself to find the unique way that I'm going to manifest this year, in this

182 The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1982, Vol. /4, No.2 world, which has never been like this before, with this body that is totally unique, with this mind, with this childhood, with this set of experiences. The rule book isn't going to be trusting good enough-no matter how fancy its covers and how uniqueness august its authors.

Thank you so much for this evening. It's been a joy just sharing this vibration with you. Namaste .

Requests for reprints to Richard Alpert/Ram Dass, Hanuman Foundation, P.O. Box 479, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87507.

A Ten- Year Perspective 183