DOCSLIB.ORG

F. Key to Abies Lasiocarpa Habitat Types

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
F. Key to Abies Lasiocarpa Habitat Types F. Key to Abies lasiocarpa habitat types 1. Equisetum arvense abundant PICEA ENGELMANNII/EQUISETUN ARVENSE h.t. (p.36) 1. E. arvense not abundant 2 2. Caltha leptosepala common or Trollius laxus well represented PICEA ENGELMANNII/CALTHA LEPTOSEPALA h.t. (p.37) 2. ~. leptosepala scarce and!. laxus poorly represented 3 3. Carex disperma well represented PICEA ENGELMANNII/CAREX DISPERMA h.t. (p.38) 3. ~. disperma poorly represented. 4 4. Calamagrostis canadensis or Ledum glandulosum well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS h.t. (p.4S) 4a. Ledum glandulosum well represented LEDUM GLANDULOSUM phase* (p.4S) 4b. Not as above; Vaccinium caespitosum common VACCINIUM CAESPITOSUM phase* (p.4S) 4c. Not as above in 4a or 4b CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS phase (p.4S) 4. C. canadensis and L. glandulosum poorly represented 5 5. Streptopus amplexifolius or Senecio triangularis well represented either separately or collectively ABIES LASIOCARPA/STREPTOPUS AMPLEXIFOLIUS h. t.* (p.46) 5. Not as above 6 6. Menziesia ferruginea well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/MENZIESIA FERRUGINEA h.t.* (p.47) 6. ~. ferruginea poorly represented 7 7. Actaea rubra common ABIES LASIOCARPA/ACTAEA RUBRA h.t. (p.47) 7. A. rubra scarce 8 8. Physocarpus malvaceus well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/PHYSOCARPUS ~1ALVACEUS h.t. (p.48) 8. ~. malvaceus poorly represented 9 9. Acer glabrum or Sorbus scopulina well represented either separately or collectively ABIES LASIOCARPA/ACER GLABRUM h.t. (p.48) 9. Not as above . 10 10. Linnaea borealis common ABIES LASIOCARPA/LINNAEA BOREALIS h.t. (p.49) lOa. Vaccinium scoparium well represented VACCINIUM SCOPARIl~ phase (p.49) lOb. ~. scoparium poorly represented LINNAEA BOREALIS phase (p.49) 10. L. borealis scarce 11 11. Xerophyllum tenax well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/XEROPHYLLUM TENAX h.t.* (p.SO) 11. X. tenax poorly represented. 12 12. Vaccinium globulare well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/VACCINIUM GLOBULARE h.t. (p.sa) 12a. Vaccinium scoparium abundant VACCINIUM SCOPARIL~ phase (p.SO) 12b. V. scoparium not abundant; Pachistimamyrsinites usually present, sites mainly south or east of Snake River Plains (fig. 2) PACHISTlMA MYRSINITES phase (p.SO) 12c. ~. myrsinites absent, sites mainly north or west of Snake River Plains . VACCINIUM GLOBULARE phase (p.Sl) 12. ~. globulare poorly represented 13 13. Luzula hitchcockii common ABIES LASIOCARPA/LUZULA HITCHCOCKII H.T.* (p.S2) 13. L. hitchcockii scarce. 14 14. Vaccinium scoparium well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/VACCINIUM SCOPARIUM h.t. (p.S2) 14a. Calamagrostis rubescens well represented CALAMAGROSTIS RUBESCENS phase (p.S2) 14b. ~. rubescens poorly represented; Pinus albicaulis well represented PINUS ALBICAULIS phase (p.S2) 14c. Not as above in 14a or 14b VACCINIUM SCOPARIUM phase (p.S2) 14. V. scoparium poorly represented 15 15. Arnica latifolia well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/ARNICA LATIFOLIA h.t. (p.S3) 15. A. latifolia poorly represented 16 16. Symphoricarpos albus well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS h.t. (p.S3) 16. ~. albus poorly represented 17 17. Thalictrum occidentale well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/THALICTRUM OCCIDENTALE h.t. (p.S4) 17. !. occidentale poorly represented. 18 18. Osmorhiza chilensis or O. depauperata well represented either separately or collectiv;ly . ABIES LASIOCARPA/OSMORHIZA CHILENSIS h.t. (p.S4) 18a. Pachistima myrsinites well represented PACHISTlMA MYRSINITES phase (p. SS) 18b. ~. myrsinites poorly represented OSMORHIZA CHILENSIS phase (p. SS) 18. Not as above 19 19. Spiraea betulifolia well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/SPlRAEA BETULIFOLIA h. t. (p. S6) 19. S. betulifolia poorly represented. 20 20. Calamagrostis rubescens well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/CALAMAGROSTIS RUBESCENS h.t. (p. S~ 20a. Pachistima myrsinites well represented PACHISTlMA MYRSINITES phase (p. S~ 20b. ~. myrsinites poorly represented CALM1AGROSTIS RUBESCENS phase (p. S7) 20. ~. rubescens poorly represented 21 21. Beberis repens common or Pachistima myrsinites well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/BERBERIS REPENS h.t. (p.SS) 2la. Carex geyeri well represented CAREX GEYERI phase* (P.59) 2lb. ~. geyeri poorly represented. BERBERIS REPENS phase (p.S9) 21. B. repens scarce and ~. myrsinites poorly represented 22 22. Carex geyeri well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/CAREX GEYERI h.t.* (p.S9) 22. ~. geyeri poorly represented 23 23. Juniperus communis well represented ABIES LASIOCARPA/JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS h.t. (p.S9) 23. ~. communis poorly represented . 24 24. Ribes montigenum well represented or the dominant plant of normally depauperate undergrowths ABIES LASIOCARPA/RIBES MONTIGENUM h.t. (p.60) 24a. Pinus albicaulis well represented PINUS ALBICAULIS phase (p.60) 24b. P. albicaulis poorly represented RIBES MONTIGENUM phase (p.60) 24. Not as above 25 25. Pedicularis racemosa common ABIES LASIOCARPA/PEDICULARIS RACEMOSA h.t. (p.60) 25. P. racemosa scarce. 26 26. Arnica cordifolia, Astragalus miser, or Shepherdia canadensis well represented or the dominant undergrowth species ABIES LASIOCARPA/ARNICA CORDIFOLIA h.t. (p.61) 26a. Picea engelmannii abundant PICEA ENGELMANNII phase (p.62) 26b. ~. engelmannii not abundant; Shepherdia canadensis well represented SHEPHERDIA CANADENSIS phase (p.62) 26c. Not as above in 26a or 26b; Astragalus miser common ASTRAGALUS MISER phase (p.62) 26d. Not as above in 26a, 26b or 26c ARNICA CORDIFOLIA phase (p.6S) 26. Not as above in 26; Carex rossii well represented or the dominant undergrowth species . ABIES LASIOCARPA/CAREX ROSSII h.t. (p.65) *H.t.s and phases incidental to study area and omitted from charts and tables. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Representativeness Assessment of Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho
    USDA United States Department of Representativeness Assessment of Agriculture Forest Service Research Natural Areas on Rocky Mountain Research Station National Forest System Lands General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-45 in Idaho March 2000 Steven K. Rust Abstract Rust, Steven K. 2000. Representativeness assessment of research natural areas on National Forest System lands in Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-45. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 129 p. A representativeness assessment of National Forest System (N FS) Research Natural Areas in ldaho summarizes information on the status of the natural area network and priorities for identification of new Research Natural Areas. Natural distribution and abundance of plant associations is compared to the representation of plant associations within natural areas. Natural distribution and abundance is estimated using modeled potential natural vegetation, published classification and inventory data, and Heritage plant community element occur- rence data. Minimum criteria are applied to select only viable, high quality plant association occurrences. In assigning natural area selection priorities, decision rules are applied to encompass consideration of the adequacy and viability of representation. Selected for analysis were 1,024 plant association occurrences within 21 4 natural areas (including 115 NFS Research Natural Areas). Of the 1,566 combinations of association within ecological sections, 28 percent require additional data for further analysis; 8, 40, and 12 percent, respectively, are ranked from high to low conservation priority; 13 percent are fully represented. Patterns in natural area needs vary between ecological section. The result provides an operational prioritization of Research Natural Area needs at landscape and subregional scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a List of Preparers and Reviewers
    Glossary adfluvial —Referring to fish that live in lakes and no significant impact, aids an agency’s compliance migrate to rivers and streams. with the National Environmental Policy Act when Beyond the Boundaries —National Wildlife Refuge no environmental impact statement is necessary, Association program to expand conservation work and facilitates preparation of a statement when to areas outside national wildlife refuge borders. one is necessary. BRWCA —Bear River Watershed Conservation Area. fluvial —Referring to fish that live in rivers and candidate species —A species of plant or animal for streams. which the USFWS has sufficient information on GCN —(A species of) greatest conservation need. their biological status and threats to propose them HAPET —Habitat and Population Evaluation Team. as endangered or threatened under the Endan- Important Bird Areas Program —A global effort to gered Species Act, but for which development of find and conserve areas that are vital to birds a proposed listing regulation is precluded by other and other biodiversity sponsored by the National higher priority listing activities. Audubon Society. CFR —Code of Federal Regulations. Intermountain West Joint Venture —Diverse partner- CO2 —Carbon dioxide. ship of 18 entities including Federal agencies, conservation easement —A legally enforceable State agencies, nonprofit conservation organiza- encumbrance or transfer of property rights to a tions, and for-profit organizations representing government agency or land trust for the purposes agriculture and industry. IWJV was founded in of conservation. Rights transferred could include 1994 to facilitate bird conservation across the vast the discretion to subdivide or develop land, change 495 million acres of the Intermountain West.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    SYSTEMATICA OF ARNICA, SUBGENUS AUSTROMONTANA AND A NEW SUBGENUS, CALARNICA (ASTERACEAE:SENECIONEAE) by GERALD BANE STRALEY B.Sc, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1968 M.Sc, Ohio University, 1974 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Botany) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA March 1980 © Gerald Bane Straley, 1980 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department nf Botany The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 26 March 1980 ABSTRACT Seven species are recognized in Arnica subgenus Austromontana and two species in a new subgenus Calarnica based on a critical review and conserva• tive revision of the species. Chromosome numbers are given for 91 populations representing all species, including the first reports for Arnica nevadensis. Results of apomixis, vegetative reproduction, breeding studies, and artifi• cial hybridizations are given. Interrelationships of insect pollinators, leaf miners, achene feeders, and floret feeders are presented. Arnica cordifolia, the ancestral species consists largely of tetraploid populations, which are either autonomous or pseudogamous apomicts, and to a lesser degree diploid, triploid, pentaploid, and hexaploid populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategy for Spokane River Basin Wetlands
    CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR SPOKANE RIVER BASIN WETLANDS Prepared by Mabel Jankovsky-Jones Conservation Data Center June 1999 Idaho Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Policy Bureau 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 Jerry Mallet, Interim Director Report prepared with funding from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through Section 104(b) (3) of the Clean Water Act Grant No. CD990620-01-0 SUMMARY The Idaho Conservation Data Center has received wetland protection grant funding from the Environmental Protection Agency under the authority of Section 104 (b)(3) of the Clean Water Act to enhance existing wetland information systems. The information summarized here can be applied to state biodiversity, conservation, and water quality enhancement projects on a watershed basis. Previous project areas included the Henrys Fork Basin, Big Wood River Basin, southeastern Idaho watersheds, the Idaho Panhandle, and east-central basins. This document is a summary of information compiled for the Spokane River Basin. We used the United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) to gain a broad perspective on the areal extant and types of wetlands in the survey area. Land ownership and management layers were overlaid on the NWI to determine ownership and the protected status of wetlands. Plant communities occurring in the survey area were placed into the hierarchical NWI classification and provide information relative to on-the-ground resource management. Assessment of the quality and condition of plant communities and the occurrence of rare plant and animal species allowed us to categorize twenty-four wetland sites based on conservation intent.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah
    MOUNTAIN PLANTS OF NORTHEASTERN UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen and Arthur H. Holmgren Revised May 1996 HG 506 FOREWORD In the original printing, the purpose of this manual was to serve as a guide for students, amateur botanists and anyone interested in the wildflowers of a rather limited geographic area. The intent was to depict and describe over 400 common, conspicuous or beautiful species. In this revision we have tried to maintain the intent and integrity of the original. Scientific names have been updated in accordance with changes in taxonomic thought since the time of the first printing. Some changes have been incorporated in order to make the manual more user-friendly for the beginner. The species are now organized primarily by floral color. We hope that these changes serve to enhance the enjoyment and usefulness of this long-popular manual. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor Utah State University Extension is an affirmative action/equal employment opportunity employer and educational organization. We offer our programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robert L. Gilliland, Vice-President and Director, Cooperative Extension
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List As of 3/19/2008 Tanya Harvey T23S.R1E.S14 *Non-Native
    compiled by Bohemia Mountain & Fairview Peak Plant List as of 3/19/2008 Tanya Harvey T23S.R1E.S14 *Non-native FERNS & ALLIES Cupressaceae Caprifoliaceae Blechnaceae Callitropsis nootkatensis Lonicera ciliosa Alaska yellowcedar orange honeysuckle Blechnum spicant deer fern Calocedrus decurrens Lonicera conjugialis incense cedar purple-flowered honeysuckle Dennstaediaceae Juniperus communis Lonicera utahensis Pteridium aquilinum common juniper Utah honeysuckle bracken fern Sambucus mexicana Dryopteridaceae Pinaceae Abies amabilis blue elderberry Athyrium alpestre Pacific silver fir alpine lady fern Sambucus racemosa Abies concolor x grandis red elderberry Athyrium filix-femina hybrid white/grand fir lady fern Symphoricarpos albus Abies grandis common snowberry Cystopteris fragilis grand fir fragile fern Symphoricarpos mollis Pinus contorta var. latifolia creeping snowberry Dryopteris expansa lodgepole pine mountain shield-fern Celastraceae Pinus monticola Paxistima myrsinites Polystichum imbricans western white pine Oregon boxwood imbricate sword fern Pseudotsuga menziesii Polystichum lonchitis Cornaceae Douglas-fir holly fern Cornus nuttallii Tsuga heterophylla Pacific dogwood Polystichum munitum western hemlock sword fern Ericaceae Tsuga mertensiana Equisetaceae Arbutus menziesii mountain hemlock madrone Equisetum telmateia giant horsetail Taxaceae Arctostaphylos nevadensis Taxus brevifolia pinemat manzanita Polypodiaceae Pacific yew Gaultheria ovatifolia Polypodium glycyrrhiza slender wintergreen licorice fern TREES & SHRUBS: DICOTS
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae Through Cucurbitaceae)
    The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) by George W. Douglas1, Gerald B. Straley2 and Del Meidinger3 1 George Douglas 2 Gerald Straley 3 Del Meidinger 6200 North Road Botanical Garden Research Branch R.R.#2 University of British Columbia B.C. Ministry of Forests Duncan, B.C. V9L 1N9 6501 S.W. Marine Drive 31 Bastion Square Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 Victoria, B. C. V8W 3E7 April 1989 Ministry of Forests THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) Contributors: Dr. G.W. Douglas, Douglas Ecological Consultants Ltd., Duncan, B.C. — Aceraceae through Betulaceae Brassicaceae (except Arabis, Cardamine and Rorippa) through Cucurbitaceae. Mr. D. Meidinger, Research Branch, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C. — Gymnosperms. Dr. G.B. Straley, Botanical Garden, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C. — Boraginaceae, Arabis and Rorippa. With the cooperation of the Royal British Columbia Museum and the Botanical University of British Columbia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Dr. G.A. Allen for providing valuable suggestions during the initial stages of the project. Thanks are also due to Drs. G.A. Allen, A. Ceska and F. Ganders for reviewing taxonomically difficult groups. Mrs. O. Ceska reviewed the final draft of Part 1. Mr. G. Mulligan kindly searched the DAO herbarium and provided information on Brassicaceae. Dr. G. Argus helped with records from CAN. Louise Gronmyr and Jean Stringer kindly typed most of the contributions and helped in many ways in the production of the final manuscript which was typeset by Beth Collins.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8459 ! " # $ %&& &'&& ( ( ( ) * + , * - * %&& * ) . /!0* ! * 12%* 34 * * 5. 24 62633$64&2%6&* + /!0 , ( 7 /.+0 , ( , ! 7 * ( ( / ! " 0 / 0 ,6 ! ( ( 8! 55 /#$%&0 , 4 %1* ) , ,6 ' - * 9 : ( , ( (( ! * ( ( ( * .7 ( , ! ( ( 11 ( ; * .+ ! 7 ( ( /** ( 0 , ( * . ( ( ( ( ( , ( * " ( .+ ( # ! * ! 6 ( ( ( ( ( ( "6< ! , ( ( % * ( ( , (( * = , .+ * )* + ! ! 5+. +. 8)% 7 )! "6< ,-.' , ' / ' 0 ( 1 ' ' ,234&5 ' * > - %&& 5.. ;36;%$ 5. 24 62633$64&2%6& ' ''' 6 $32 / '99 *-*9 ? @ ' ''' 6 $320 List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic study of Arnica (Asteraceae): Low chloroplast DNA variation and problematic subgeneric classification. Sys- tematic Botany
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant List Whatcom County Whatcom County. Whatcom County, WA
    Vascular Plant List Whatcom County Whatcom County. Whatcom County, WA. List covers plants found in Whatcom County. Combination of plant lists of areas within Whatcom County, made by various observers over several years, with numerous additions by Jim Duemmel. Plants collected in Whatcom County found in the UW and WSU herbariums have been added to the list. 1175 spp., 223 introduced. Prepared by Don Knoke 2004. These lists represent the work of different WNPS members over the years. Their accuracy has not been verified by the Washington Native Plant Society. We offer these lists to individuals as a tool to enhance the enjoyment and study of native plants. * - Introduced Scientific Name Common Name Family Name Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir Pinaceae Abies grandis Grand fir Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Sub-alpine fir Pinaceae Abies procera Noble fir Pinaceae Acer circinatum Vine maple Aceraceae Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae Achillea millefolium Yarrow Asteraceae Achlys triphylla Vanilla leaf Berberidaceae Aconitum columbianum Monkshood Ranunculaceae Actaea rubra Baneberry Ranunculaceae Adenocaulon bicolor Pathfinder Asteraceae Adiantum pedatum Maidenhair fern Polypodiaceae Agoseris aurantiaca Orange agoseris Asteraceae Agoseris glauca Mountain agoseris Asteraceae Agropyron caninum Bearded wheatgrass Poaceae Agropyron repens* Quack grass Poaceae Agropyron spicatum Blue-bunch wheatgrass Poaceae Agrostemma githago* Common corncockle Caryophyllaceae Agrostis alba* Red top Poaceae Agrostis exarata*
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflowers of the Bear Creek Mountain Trail #1130 from the Section 3 Lake Trailhead to the Summit of Bear Creek Mt
    Wildflowers of the Bear Creek Mountain Trail #1130 from the Section 3 Lake Trailhead to the summit of Bear Creek Mt. Goat Rocks Wilderness Yakima County, WA from a hike on July 31, 2019 T12N R12E S3. 4, 8, 9 & 17 Updated: December 16, 2019 Common Name Scientific Name Family Ferns & Horsetails ____ Common Horsetail Equisetum arvense Equisetaceae Monocots - Sedges, Rushes, Grasses & Herbaceous Wildflowers ____ Showy Sedge Carex spectabilis Cyperaceae ____ Merten's Rush Juncus mertensianus Juncaceae ____ Parry's Rush Juncus parryi Juncaceae ____ Hitchcock's Woodrush Luzula hitchcockii Juncaceae ____ Piper's Woodrush Luzula piperi Juncaceae ____ Glacier Lily Erythronium (grandiflorum v. grandiflorum ?) Liliaceae ____ White Bog Orchid Platanthera dilatata v. dilatata Orchidaceae ____ Slender Bog Orchid Platanthera stricta Orchidaceae ____ Mountain Bentgrass Agrostis variabilis ? Poaceae ____ Mountain Brome Bromus sitchensis v. marginatus Poaceae ____ Tufted Hair Grass Deschampsia cespitosa ? Poaceae ____ Bottlebrush Squirreltail Elymus elymoides Poaceae ____ Alpine Timothy Phleum alpinum Poaceae ____ Timothy Phleum pratense Poaceae ____ Narrow False Oat Trisetum spicatum Poaceae Trees and Shrubs ____ Black Elderberry Sambucus racemosa v. melanocarpa Adoxaceae ____ Nootka Cedar Chamaecyparis nookatensis Cupressaceae ____ Common Juniper Juniperus communis v. jackii Cupressaceae ____ White Mountain Heather Cassiope mertensianus Ericaceae ____ Pink Mountain Heather Phyllodoce empetriformis Ericaceae ____ Yellow Mountain Heather Phyllodoce glandulifera
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]