DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a List of Preparers and Reviewers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a List of Preparers and Reviewers Glossary adfluvial —Referring to fish that live in lakes and no significant impact, aids an agency’s compliance migrate to rivers and streams. with the National Environmental Policy Act when Beyond the Boundaries —National Wildlife Refuge no environmental impact statement is necessary, Association program to expand conservation work and facilitates preparation of a statement when to areas outside national wildlife refuge borders. one is necessary. BRWCA —Bear River Watershed Conservation Area. fluvial —Referring to fish that live in rivers and candidate species —A species of plant or animal for streams. which the USFWS has sufficient information on GCN —(A species of) greatest conservation need. their biological status and threats to propose them HAPET —Habitat and Population Evaluation Team. as endangered or threatened under the Endan- Important Bird Areas Program —A global effort to gered Species Act, but for which development of find and conserve areas that are vital to birds a proposed listing regulation is precluded by other and other biodiversity sponsored by the National higher priority listing activities. Audubon Society. CFR —Code of Federal Regulations. Intermountain West Joint Venture —Diverse partner- CO2 —Carbon dioxide. ship of 18 entities including Federal agencies, conservation easement —A legally enforceable State agencies, nonprofit conservation organiza- encumbrance or transfer of property rights to a tions, and for-profit organizations representing government agency or land trust for the purposes agriculture and industry. IWJV was founded in of conservation. Rights transferred could include 1994 to facilitate bird conservation across the vast the discretion to subdivide or develop land, change 495 million acres of the Intermountain West. current land use practices, sever water rights, or Intermountain West Joint Venture Implementation others as appropriate, and are specified by con- Plan —A plan that provides direction for integrat- tract between the landowner and the conservation ing the conservation of all migratory birds under entity. one framework. The process involves stepping conservation strategy —An adaptive approach for down the objectives of the four plans for the inter- integrating biological priorities with current national species groups of waterfowl, shorebirds, socioeconomic threats to habitat to target the other waterbirds, and landbirds. Population and acquisition of wetland and grassland easements in habitat trends, coupled with knowledge of how the Bear River of Region 6. The strategy focuses species respond to landscape change, would be on the five, primary, upland-nesting duck species, used to build a biological foundation and set quan- which also provide for other trust species’ bene- tifiable goals. fits. To meet the goal of this strategy, there is an landscape conservation cooperative (LCC) —A pub- estimated need of an additional 1.4 million acres lic–private partnership intended to facilitate of high-priority wetland and 10.4 million acres of cross-political boundary conservation in the face high-priority grassland. of a changing environment through application of EA —See environmental assessment. science. endangered species —A species of plant or animal land protection plan (LPP) —Describes resource pro- that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a tection needs, proposes a refuge or conservation significant part of its range. area boundary, and identifies in priority order Endangered Species Act —A law passed by Congress the areas that the Service may buy land interests in 1973 with the purpose of protecting and recov- from willing sellers. ering imperiled species and the ecosystems on LCC —See landscape conservation cooperative. which they depend. LPP —See land protection plan. environmental assessment (EA) —A public document Marxan —A software package used as a decision sup- for which a Federal agency is responsible. An port tool for spatial conservation prioritization. environmental assessment provides evidence and NRCS —Natural Resources Conservation Service, an analysis for determining whether to prepare an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. environmental impact statement or a finding of NWR —National wildlife refuge. 120 Draft EA and LPP—Proposed Bear River Watershed Conservation Area; Idaho, Utah, Wyoming Refuge System —National Wildlife Refuge System. Comprised of four stages: Biological Planning, Region 1 —An administrative unit of the Service Conservation Design, Delivery of Conservation known as the Pacific Region encompassing Hawaii, Action, and Monitoring and Research. Idaho, Oregon, Washington and Pacific Island Ter- threatened species —A species of plant or animal that ritories and United States affiliated States. is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable Region 6 —An administrative unit of the Service future. known as the Mountain–Prairie Region, which trust species —Federal trust species include threat- covers eight States: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, ened and endangered species, as well as migratory Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, birds such as waterfowl, wading birds, shorebirds, and Wyoming. and neotropical migratory songbirds, anadromous Service, or USFWS —U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (migratory) fish such as salmon. an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S.C. —United States Code. strategic habitat conservation —A process used within USDA —U.S. Department of Agriculture. the Service to set biological goals for priority spe- USFWS, or Service —U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, cies populations, make strategic decisions, and an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior. to reassess and improve management actions. WPA —Waterfowl production area. Appendix A List of Preparers and Reviewers Author name Position Work unit David Allen realty specialist USFWS, Region 1, Division of Realty, Portland, Oregon USFWS, Region 6, Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, Bob Barrett project leader Brigham City, Utah Pamela Benn realty specialist USFWS, Region 1, Division of Realty, Portland, Oregon Badge Blackett Landscape Conservation Programs National Wildlife Refuge Association, Washington, DC USFWS, Region 6, Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, Howard Browers refuge biologist Brigham City, Utah Steve Caicco conservation planner USFWS, Region 1, Planning Division, Portland, Oregon USFWS, Region 1, Southeast Idaho Refuge Complex, Tracy Casselman project leader Chubbock, Idaho U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Region 1, Bear Annette deKnijf refuge manager Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Montpelier, Idaho wildlife biologist, Inventory and USFWS, Region 6, Benton Lake National Wildlife Joann Dullum Monitoring GIS specialist Refuge, Great Falls, Montana USFWS, Region 6, Division of Refuge Planning, Mark Ely cartographer Lakewood, Colorado USFWS, Region 6, Benton Lake National Wildlife Ref- Sean Fields HAPET biologist uge, Great Falls, Montana Utah State coordinator for Partners USFWS, Region 6, Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, Karl Fleming for Fish and Wildlife program Brigham City, Utah USFWS, Region 6, Cokeville Meadows National Wildlife Todd Gallion refuge manager Refuge, Cokeville, Wyoming Pat Gonzales-Rogers tribal liaison USFWS, Region 1, External Affairs, Portland, Oregon USFWS, Region 6, External Affairs, Lakewood, Kim Greenwood tribal liaison Colorado Wyoming State coordinator for Part- USFWS, Region 6, Partners for Fish and Wildlife State Mark Hogan ners for Fish and Wildlife program Office, Lander, Wyoming biologist for Partners for Fish and USFWS, Region 6, Partners for Fish and Wildlife State David Kimble Wildlife program Office, Evanston, Wyoming USFWS, Region 6, Cokeville Meadows and Seedskadee Tom Koerner project leader National Wildlife Refuges, Green River, Wyoming Greg Langer law enforcement officer USFWS, Region 6, Lakewood, Colorado USFWS, Region 6, Bozeman Fish Technology Center, Brant Loflin archaeologist Montana USFWS, Region 6, Division of Refuge Planning, Lake- David C. Lucas division chief wood, Colorado USFWS, Region 6, Division of Realty, Huron, South Noel Matson realty specialist Dakota 122 Draft EA and LPP—Proposed Bear River Watershed Conservation Area; Idaho, Utah, Wyoming Author name Position Work unit Tom Miewald geographer and conservation planner USFWS, Region 1, Planning Division, Portland, Oregon USFWS, Region 6, Cokeville Meadows and Seedskadee Carl Millegan former project leader National Wildlife Refuges, Green River, Wyoming USFWS, Region 6, Division of Realty, Lakewood, Linda Moeder cartographer Colorado USFWS, Region 6, Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, Greg Mullin law enforcement officer Brigham City, Utah biologist for Partners for Fish and USFWS, Region 1, Partners for Fish and Wildlife Cary Myler Wildlife program Program, Chubbock, Idaho USFWS, Region 6, Division of Realty, Lakewood, Sue Oliveira former division chief Colorado USFWS, Region 6, Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, Kathi Stopher visitor services manager Brigham City, Utah USFWS, Region 6, Division of Refuge Planning, Amy Thornburg land protection planning team leader Lakewood, Colorado Anne Truslow Strategic Programs and Development National Wildlife Refuge Association, Washington, DC Meg Van Ness regional historic preservation officer USFWS, Region 6, Refuges, Lakewood, Colorado USFWS, Region 6, Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, Sharon Vaughn deputy project leader Brigham City, Utah USFWS, Region 6, Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Jeffrey Warren wildlife biologist Refuge, Lima, Montana Reviewer name Position
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Travels in America Performed in 1806, for the Purpose of Exploring
    Library of Congress Travels in America performed in 1806, for the purpose of exploring the rivers Alleghany, Monongahela, Ohio, and Mississippi, and ascertaining the produce and condition of their banks and vicinity. By Thomas Ashe, esq. ... TRAVELS IN AMERICA, PERFORMED IN 1806, For the Purpose of exploring the RIVERS ALLEGHANY, MONONGAHELA, OHIO, AND MISSISSIPPI, AND ASCERTAINING THE PRODUCE AND CONDITION OF THEIR BANKS AND VICINITY. BY THOMAS ASHE, ESQ. IN THREE VOLUMES. VOL. 1. LC LONDON: PRINTED FOR RICHARD PHILLIPS, BRIDGE-STREET; By John Abraham, Clement's Lane. 1808. F333 A8 224612 15 PREFACE. Travels in America performed in 1806, for the purpose of exploring the rivers Alleghany, Monongahela, Ohio, and Mississippi, and ascertaining the produce and condition of their banks and vicinity. By Thomas Ashe, esq. ... http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbtn.3028a Library of Congress IT is universally acknowledged, that no description of writing comprehends so much amusement and entertainment as well written accounts of voyages and travels, especially in countries little known. If the voyages of a Cook and his followers, exploratory of the South Sea Islands, and the travels of a Bruce, or a Park, in the interior regions of Africa, have merited and obtained celebrity, the work now presented to the public cannot but claim a similar merit. The western part of America, become interesting in every point of view, has been little known, and misrepresented by the few writers on the subject, led by motives of interest or traffic, and has not heretofore been exhibited in a satisfactory manner. Mr. Ashe, the author of the present work, and who has now returned to America, here gives an account every way satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Representativeness Assessment of Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho
    USDA United States Department of Representativeness Assessment of Agriculture Forest Service Research Natural Areas on Rocky Mountain Research Station National Forest System Lands General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-45 in Idaho March 2000 Steven K. Rust Abstract Rust, Steven K. 2000. Representativeness assessment of research natural areas on National Forest System lands in Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-45. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 129 p. A representativeness assessment of National Forest System (N FS) Research Natural Areas in ldaho summarizes information on the status of the natural area network and priorities for identification of new Research Natural Areas. Natural distribution and abundance of plant associations is compared to the representation of plant associations within natural areas. Natural distribution and abundance is estimated using modeled potential natural vegetation, published classification and inventory data, and Heritage plant community element occur- rence data. Minimum criteria are applied to select only viable, high quality plant association occurrences. In assigning natural area selection priorities, decision rules are applied to encompass consideration of the adequacy and viability of representation. Selected for analysis were 1,024 plant association occurrences within 21 4 natural areas (including 115 NFS Research Natural Areas). Of the 1,566 combinations of association within ecological sections, 28 percent require additional data for further analysis; 8, 40, and 12 percent, respectively, are ranked from high to low conservation priority; 13 percent are fully represented. Patterns in natural area needs vary between ecological section. The result provides an operational prioritization of Research Natural Area needs at landscape and subregional scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuller’S Leadership and Over- Vincent of the Refuge Staff Are Notable for Having Sight Were Invaluable
    Acknowledgments Acknowledgments Many people have contributed to this plan over many detailed and technical requirements of sub- the last seven years. Several key staff positions, missions to the Service, the Environmental Protec- including mine, have been filled by different people tion Agency, and the Federal Register. Jon during the planning period. Tom Palmer and Neil Kauffeld’s and Nita Fuller’s leadership and over- Vincent of the Refuge staff are notable for having sight were invaluable. We benefited from close col- been active in the planning for the entire extent. laboration and cooperation with staff of the Illinois Tom and Neil kept the details straight and the rest Department of Natural Resources. Their staff par- of us on track throughout. Mike Brown joined the ticipated from the early days of scoping through staff in the midst of the process and contributed new reviews and re-writes. We appreciate their persis- insights, analysis, and enthusiasm that kept us mov- tence, professional expertise, and commitment to ing forward. Beth Kerley and John Magera pro- our natural resources. Finally, we value the tremen- vided valuable input on the industrial and public use dous involvement of citizens throughout the plan- aspects of the plan. Although this is a refuge plan, ning process. We heard from visitors to the Refuge we received notable support from our regional office and from people who care about the Refuge without planning staff. John Schomaker provided excep- ever having visited. Their input demonstrated a tional service coordinating among the multiple level of caring and thought that constantly interests and requirements within the Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF MIDDLE ARCHAIC PLANT EXPLOITATION: GEOCHEMICAL, MACROBOTANICAL AND TAPHONOMIC ANALYSES OF DEPOSITS AT MOUNDED TALUS ROCKSHELTER, EASTERN KENTUCKY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Katherine Robinson Mickelson, M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetable Gardening Vegetable Gardening
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® The Magazine of the American Horticultural Society January / February 2009 Vegetable Gardening tips for success New Plants and TTrendsrends for 2009 How to Prune Deciduous Shrubs Sweet Rewards of Indoor Citrus Confidence shows. Because a mistake can ruin an entire gardening season, passionate gardeners don’t like to take chances. That’s why there’s Osmocote® Smart-Release® Plant Food. It’s guaranteed not to burn when used as directed, and the granules don’t easily wash away, no matter how much you water. Better still, Osmocote feeds plants continuously and consistently for four full months, so you can garden with confidence. Maybe that’s why passionate gardeners have trusted Osmocote for 40 years. Looking for expert advice and answers to your gardening questions? Visit PlantersPlace.com — a fresh, new online gardening community. © 2007, Scotts-Sierra Horticulture Products Company. World rights reserved. www.osmocote.com contents Volume 88, Number 1 . January / February 2009 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM AHS Renee’s Garden sponsors 2009 Seed Exchange, Stanley Smith Horticultural Trust grant funds future library at River Farm, AHS welcomes new members to Board of Directors, save the date for the 17th annual National Children & Youth Garden Symposium in July. 42 ONE ON ONE WITH… Bonnie Harper-Lore, America’s roadside ecologist. page 14 44 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK All-America Selections winners for 2009, scientists discover new plant hormone, NEW PLANTS AND TRENDS FOR 2009 BY DOREEN G. HOWARD 14 Massachusetts Horticultural Society forced Get a sneak peek at some of the exciting plants that will hit the to cancel one of market this year, along with expert insight on garden trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining and Improving Habitat for Hummingbirds in Colorado, Wyoming and South Dakota
    United States Department of Agriculture Maintaining and Improving Habitat for Hummingbirds in Colorado, Wyoming and South Dakota A Land Manager’s Guide Forest Service National Headquarters Introduction Food Hummingbirds play an important role in the food web, Hummingbirds feed by day on nectar pollinating a variety of owering plants, some of which from owers, including annuals, perenni- are speci cally adapted to pollination by hummingbirds. als, trees, shrubs, and vines. Native nectar Some hummingbirds are at risk, like other pollinators, plants are listed in the table near the end due to habitat loss, changes in the distribution and of this guide. ey feed while hovering or, abundance of nectar plants (which are a ected by climate if possible, while perched. ey also eat change), the spread of invasive plants, and pesticide use. Rufous Hummingbird nest insects, such as fruit- ies and gnats, and is guide is intended to help you provide and improve Courtesy of Martin Hutten will consume tree sap, when it is available. habitat for hummingbirds, as well as other pollinators, ey obtain tree sap from sap wells drilled in Colorado, Wyoming, and South Dakota. While hummingbirds, like all birds, have the in trees by sapsuckers and other hole-drill- Western columbine—Aquilegia formosa Courtesy of Gary A. Monroe basic habitat needs of food, water, shelter, and space, this guide is focused on providing ing birds. USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database food—the plants that provide nectar for hummingbirds. Because climate, geology, and vegetation vary widely in di erent areas, speci c recommendations are presented for each ecoregion in Colorado, Wyoming, and South Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategy for Spokane River Basin Wetlands
    CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR SPOKANE RIVER BASIN WETLANDS Prepared by Mabel Jankovsky-Jones Conservation Data Center June 1999 Idaho Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Policy Bureau 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 Jerry Mallet, Interim Director Report prepared with funding from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through Section 104(b) (3) of the Clean Water Act Grant No. CD990620-01-0 SUMMARY The Idaho Conservation Data Center has received wetland protection grant funding from the Environmental Protection Agency under the authority of Section 104 (b)(3) of the Clean Water Act to enhance existing wetland information systems. The information summarized here can be applied to state biodiversity, conservation, and water quality enhancement projects on a watershed basis. Previous project areas included the Henrys Fork Basin, Big Wood River Basin, southeastern Idaho watersheds, the Idaho Panhandle, and east-central basins. This document is a summary of information compiled for the Spokane River Basin. We used the United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) to gain a broad perspective on the areal extant and types of wetlands in the survey area. Land ownership and management layers were overlaid on the NWI to determine ownership and the protected status of wetlands. Plant communities occurring in the survey area were placed into the hierarchical NWI classification and provide information relative to on-the-ground resource management. Assessment of the quality and condition of plant communities and the occurrence of rare plant and animal species allowed us to categorize twenty-four wetland sites based on conservation intent.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnaconitum, a New Genus of Ranunculaceae Endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
    TAXON 62 (4) • August 2013: 713–722 Wang & al. • Gymnaconitum, a new genus of Ranunculaceae Gymnaconitum, a new genus of Ranunculaceae endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Wei Wang,1 Yang Liu,2 Sheng-Xiang Yu,1 Tian-Gang Gao1 & Zhi-Duan Chen1 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, P.R. China 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3043, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Wei Wang, [email protected] Abstract The monophyly of traditional Aconitum remains unresolved, owing to the controversial systematic position and taxonomic treatment of the monotypic, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau endemic A. subg. Gymnaconitum. In this study, we analyzed two datasets using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods: (1) two markers (ITS, trnL-F) of 285 Delphinieae species, and (2) six markers (ITS, trnL-F, trnH-psbA, trnK-matK, trnS-trnG, rbcL) of 32 Delphinieae species. All our analyses show that traditional Aconitum is not monophyletic and that subgenus Gymnaconitum and a broadly defined Delphinium form a clade. The SOWH tests also reject the inclusion of subgenus Gymnaconitum in traditional Aconitum. Subgenus Gymnaconitum markedly differs from other species of Aconitum and other genera of tribe Delphinieae in many non-molecular characters. By integrating lines of evidence from molecular phylogeny, divergence times, morphology, and karyology, we raise the mono- typic A. subg. Gymnaconitum to generic status. Keywords Aconitum; Delphinieae; Gymnaconitum; monophyly; phylogeny; Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; Ranunculaceae; SOWH test Supplementary Material The Electronic Supplement (Figs. S1–S8; Appendices S1, S2) and the alignment files are available in the Supplementary Data section of the online version of this article (http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • Clough Island: a Summary of Inventory and Monitoring
    Clough Island: A Summary of Inventory and Monitoring Wisconsin’s Natural Heritage Inventory Program Bureau of Natural Heritage Conservation Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI53707 November 2014 PUB-NH-849 2014 Clough Island Inventory and Monitoring Summary 1 Acknowledgments We extend special thanks to Dave Lindsley, Paul Piszczek, Fred Strand, Cheri Hagen, Nancy Larson, and Ryan Magana of the Wisconsin DNR, Paul Hlina of Leaning Pine Natives, Christine Ostern of Douglas County Land Conservation Department, Valerie Brady of the Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota-Duluth, and Erika Washburn, Shon Schooler, and Sue O'Halloran of the National Estuarine Research Reserve for their assistance in compiling this report and assisting with property access, field surveys, data contribution, and project review. We are also grateful for support from the Ecosystem Management Planning Team, Kate Fitzgerald, Erin Crain, Timothy Reneau-Major, and Owen Boyle. Funding for this project was provided in part by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program, grant number C-15-L-1,F05AP00014.Funding was also provided by the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under the Coastal Zone Management Act, Grant #4NA12NOS4190091 and Grant #1NA13NOS4190043. Primary Authors: Richard Staffen and Ryan O'Connor Contributors: • Nicholas Anich – migratory bird surveys • Paula Spaeth
    [Show full text]