DOCSLIB.ORG

Chiasmic Rhetoric: Alan Turing Between Bodies and Words Patricia Fancher Clemson University, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chiasmic Rhetoric: Alan Turing Between Bodies and Words Patricia Fancher Clemson University, Fancher.Patricia@Gmail.Com Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 8-2014 Chiasmic Rhetoric: Alan Turing Between Bodies and Words Patricia Fancher Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Part of the Rhetoric and Composition Commons Recommended Citation Fancher, Patricia, "Chiasmic Rhetoric: Alan Turing Between Bodies and Words" (2014). All Dissertations. 1285. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1285 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHIASMIC RHETORIC: ALAN TURING BETWEEN BODIES AND WORDS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Philosophy Rhetorics, Communication, and Information Design by Patricia Fancher August 2014 Accepted by: Dr. Steven B. Katz, Committee Chair Dr. Diane Perpich Dr. Cynthia Haynes Dr. D. Travers Scott DISSERTATION ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes the life and writing of inventor and scientist Alan Turing in order to define and theorize chiasmic relations between bodies and texts. Chiasmic rhetoric, as I develop throughout the dissertation, is the dynamic processes between materials and discourses that interact to construct powerful rhetorical effect, shape bodies, and also compose new knowledges. Throughout the dissertation, I develop chiasmic rhetoric as intersecting bodies and discourse, dynamic and productive, and potentially destabilizing. Turing is an unusual figure for research on bodily rhetoric and embodied knowledge. He is often associated with disembodied knowledge and as his inventions are said to move intelligence towards greater abstraction and away from human bodies. However, this dissertation exposes the many ways that bodies are active in shaping and producing knowledge even within Turing’s scientific and technical writing. I identify how, in every text that Turing produces, chiasmic interactions between bodies and texts actively compose Turing’s scientific knowledge and technical innovations towards digital computation and artificial intelligence. His knowledge, thus, is not composed out of abstract logic, or neutral technological advances. Rather, his knowledge and invention are composed and in through discourses and embodied experiences. Given that bodies and discourses are also composed within social and political power dynamics, then the political, social, and personal embodied experiences that compose Turing’s life and his embodiment also compose his texts, rhetoric, inventions, and science. ii In Chapter 1, I introduce Alan Turing and the significance of my research for the fields of rhetoric of science and technology, body studies, and also for our understanding of Alan Turing’s technical writing. In Chapter Two, I first show that antithesis has been the primary figure representing the dichotomy between bodies and knowledge. However, I also draw from feminist science studies and a style analysis of Turing’s essay “Nature of Spirit” to demonstrate that a strong antithesis between bodies and mind can never be maintained: bodies can never be totally excluded and bodily presence is rhetorically significant. In Chapter Three, I define how bodies are always already connected with discourse: the two can never be separated. In Turing’s article “On Computable Numbers with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem,” the intersection between bodies and texts is significant in the way that Turing draws from his embodied experience performing calculation in order to invent the Turing Machine, which became an important theoretical foundation for digital computation. In Chapter Four, I argue that the chiasmic relation between bodies and texts is dynamic and productive. The dynamic chiasmus in Turing’s article “Intelligent Machinery” reveals the ways that Turing’s embodiment as a homosexual man in England in the 20th century informs his early proposals for how to develop artificial intelligence. In particular, the very same disciplining—through intervention and a focus on the body— that compose Turing’s embodied experiences as a subject of sexuality and governmentality also composes Turing’s proposal for constructing intelligence in machines. In Chapter 5, I posit that Turing rhetorically constructs a disruptive notion of iii machine intelligence that is embodied, feminine, and performative or imitative. This finding is of particular importance in the field of science and technology, which is predominantly known for excluding women as well as qualities associated with femininity. Turing disrupts traditional expectations in technical writing by feminizing the machine. His article “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” disrupts traditional definitions of intelligence by making femininity, fallibility, and embodiment central components that qualify a machine as an intelligent being. In Chapter 6, I conclude by demonstrating the importance of chiasmic relations between bodies and texts for technical writing broadly, including the teaching of technical writing. Then I end by proposing a pedagogy of care and disorientation that are attuned to the complex embodiment of students interacting with texts in our composition classrooms. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When I started this project, I could not have imagined all that I have been able to accomplish in this dissertation. For his role helping me develop as a scholar, I must thank Dr. Steven Katz—mentor and friend—who saw my potential and pushed me to reach that potential. Steve Katz sets a high standard for scholars and he helped me reach that standard. I am ever thankful and will never be the same. To my committee, Dr. Cynthia Haynes, Dr. Diane Perpich, and Dr. Travers Scott, I thank you for the support, encouragement, challenges, time, and energy. With each meeting, each of you helped me to understand why this research is significant and how I can work to develop its significance. Cynthia Haynes, I survived this past year with the help of your smile, laughter, and embrace. I aspire to emulate your example of what a woman scholar can achieve. I would not be here with out Victor Vitanza, who always trusted and valued my embodied knowledge. I thank VV for the dis/orientations that brought me so far. I also thank the Potent Object Project and Brent Pafford. This project saved me from the isolation of dissertating and enriched my days with stories, communities, friends, voices, hands, coffee, and so many many mugs. The Society of the Third Sophistic has been my intellectual family who supported and challenged me for the past four years. And they will continue to be my intellectual family as I continue my scholarship. I am especially indebted to Dr. Jared Colton and Dr. Glen Southergill, who read so much of my writing for 4s years and responded generously, even when none of us was sure what I was doing. I have so many friends who have loved, supported, listened, and cared for me. Without them, I would not be who v I am. I thank Christina Hung for burying me in books and the many other art-practice coping mechanisms. I thank Per Hoel. Somehow, we made it through together. I could have done it without him, but I would not have been able to preserve my joy, smile, and passion. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PAGE .................................................................................................................................. i ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... v CHAPTER I. CHIASMIC RHETORIC ......................................................................................... 1 Constructing Alan Turing ................................................................................ 6 Tracing Bodies in Philosophy and Rhetoric ............................................... 11 Chiasmus and Embodiment ............................................................................ 21 Chapter Overview ............................................................................................. 27 II. PRODUCING ANTITHESIS THEN BREAKING ANTITHESIS ......... 30 Turing’s Education ........................................................................................... 32 Alan Turing’s “Nature of Spirit” ................................................................... 34 Form and Rhetoric of Antithesis ................................................................... 42 Identifying Antithesis in “Nature of Spirit” ................................................ 47 Movements of Antithesis ................................................................................ 52 Feminist Critiques of Antithesis .................................................................... 54 Losing Antithesis in “Nature of Spirit” ........................................................ 62 From Antithesis towards a New Figure ...................................................... 64 III. INTERSECTING BODIES AND DISCOURSE ........................................... 67 Defining Chiasmus ............................................................................................ 70 vii Universal and Relative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Board of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics
    Book of Abstracts for the 3rd Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics Multimodalities Book of Abstracts for the 3rd Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics Multimodalities Toronto, Ontario (Canada) July 13–15, 2018 IACS-2018: Third Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics | 1 Local Organizing Committee of IACS-2018 Some rights reserved. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Among other sponsors, this project was made possible by funding from the Dean of the Faculty of Arts, Ryerson University, in addition to funding from the Ryerson University Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation and the Ryerson University Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, including a Knowledge Dissemination Grant (KDG), an Undergraduate Research Opportunity Grant (URO) and an Event Funding Grant. Please see the back cover of this manuscript for a full list of project partners. No responsibility is assumed by the IACS-2018 Local Organizing Committee for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of product liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Printed in Toronto, Ontario (Canada) 2 | IACS-2018: Third Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics About the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics The International Association for Cognitive Semiotics (IACS) was founded in 2013 at Aarhus University, Denmark, in connection with the Eighth Conference of the Nordic Association for Semiotic Studies (NASS). Cognitive semiotics is the study of meaning-making, both in language and by means of other sign vehicles, as well as in perception, and in action.
    [Show full text]
  • 245 LIST A'brakel, Wilhelmus the Christian's Reasonable Service
    LIST 245 1. A’BRAKEL, The Christian’s Reasonable Service. S.D.G.-1992. d.w’s. 4 £ 45.00 Wilhelmus volumes. ills. 2. ADAMS, J. E. The Time is at Hand. Prophecy and the Book of Revelation. £ 3.95 Timeless Texts-2000. lfpb. 16+138pp. 3. ADAMS, J. E. A Theology of Christian Counselling More than Redemption. £ 4.95 Zon.-1979 lfpb. 338pp. 4. ADAMS, J. E/FISHER The Time of the End. Daniel’s Prophecy Reclaimed. Timeless £ 3.95 Text-2000. lfpb. 120pp. Frwd. by R. C. Sproul. 5. ADAMS, J. G. The Big Umbrella. (Christian Counselling) BBH.-1975. lfpb. £ 4.50 265pp. 6. ALLISON, D.C Jesus of Nazareth Millenarian Prophet. Fortress-1998. lfpb. £ 4.50 255pp. 7. ALTHUSIUS, J. (1557 Politica. An abridged translation of Politics methodically set £ 8.50 -1638) forth and illustrated with Sacred and Profane examples. Trans. by F. S. Carney. Liberty -1995. lfpb. 62+238pp. From 1614 edition. 8. ALVARDO, R. A Common Law, the Law of Nations and Western Civilization. £ 3.50 Pietas-1999. lfpb. 161pp. 9. AMBROSE, Isaac Looking Unto Jesus. A View of the Everlasting Gospel etc. £ 8.00 Sprinkle-1986. hb. 694pp. Large volume, Puritan devotional classic. 10. ANON The Truth of the History of the Gospel Made Out by Heathen £ 22.00 Evidence. Edin.-1741. 38pp. XL. Pam. 11. ANON Queries Concerning the Reasonableness of Reclaiming the £ 22.00 Corporation Test Acts as Far as They Relate to Protestant Dissenters. Lon.-1732. 23pp. XL. Pam. Scarce. 12. ASHTON John F. Edt. In Six Days: Why 50 Scientists choose to Believe in Creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I Background
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19746-5 - Transitions and Trees: An Introduction to Structural Operational Semantics Hans Huttel Excerpt More information PART I BACKGROUND © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19746-5 - Transitions and Trees: An Introduction to Structural Operational Semantics Hans Huttel Excerpt More information 1 A question of semantics The goal of this chapter is to give the reader a glimpse of the applications and problem areas that have motivated and to this day continue to inspire research in the important area of computer science known as programming language semantics. 1.1 Semantics is the study of meaning Programming language semantics is the study of mathematical models of and methods for describing and reasoning about the behaviour of programs. The word semantics has Greek roots1 and was first used in linguistics. Here, one distinguishes among syntax, the study of the structure of lan- guages, semantics, the study of meaning, and pragmatics, the study of the use of language. In computer science we make a similar distinction between syntax and se- mantics. The languages that we are interested in are programming languages in a very general sense. The ‘meaning’ of a program is its behaviour, and for this reason programming language semantics is the part of programming language theory devoted to the study of program behaviour. Programming language semantics is concerned only with purely internal aspects of program behaviour, namely what happens within a running pro- gram. Program semantics does not claim to be able to address other aspects of program behaviour – e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model for Programming Languages: the Birth of A
    The Standard Model for Programming Languages: The Birth of a Mathematical Theory of Computation Simone Martini Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Italy INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, Valbonne, France http://www.cs.unibo.it/~martini [email protected] Abstract Despite the insight of some of the pioneers (Turing, von Neumann, Curry, Böhm), programming the early computers was a matter of fiddling with small architecture-dependent details. Only in the sixties some form of “mathematical program development” will be in the agenda of some of the most influential players of that time. A “Mathematical Theory of Computation” is the name chosen by John McCarthy for his approach, which uses a class of recursively computable functions as an (extensional) model of a class of programs. It is the beginning of that grand endeavour to present programming as a mathematical activity, and reasoning on programs as a form of mathematical logic. An important part of this process is the standard model of programming languages – the informal assumption that the meaning of programs should be understood on an abstract machine with unbounded resources, and with true arithmetic. We present some crucial moments of this story, concluding with the emergence, in the seventies, of the need of more “intensional” semantics, like the sequential algorithms on concrete data structures. The paper is a small step of a larger project – reflecting and tracing the interaction between mathematical logic and programming (languages), identifying some
    [Show full text]
  • Chiasmus in Ancient Greek and Latin Literatures
    Chiasmus in Ancient Greek and Latin Literatures John W. Welch Notwithstanding the fact that most recent scholarly attention has dealt with the occurrence of chiasmus in ancient Near Eastern languages and literatures, a signicant amount of chiasmus is to be found in ancient Greek and Latin literatures as well. Indeed, the word ,,chiasmus” itself stems from the Greek word chiazein, meaning to mark with or in the shape of a cross, and chiasmus has been earnestly studied in Greek and Latin syntax and style far more extensively and many years longer than is has even been acknowledged in the context of Semitic and other ancient writings. That chiasmus has received more attention in the Classical setting than in other ancient literatures is at the same time both ironic and yet completely understandable. The irony lies in the fact that more scholarly acceptance and utilization of chiasmus is found in connection with the appreciation of Western literary traditions than in the study of other ancient literatures, whereas chiasmus is relatively simple and certainly less informative in respect to the Greek and Latin authors than it is in regard to many of the writers from other arenas of the ancient world. One would expect the greater efforts to be made where the rewards promise to be the more attractive. Yet this situation is also easily explained. For one thing, numerous Western scholars have exhaustively studied secular Greek literary texts since the thirteenth century, and Latin, since it was spoken in Rome. The use of literary devices in Hebrew literature, on the other hand, has only been given relatively sparse scholarly treatment in the West for something over two hundred years, and the study of gures of speech in most other ancient languages, dialects and literatures can still be said to be somewhat in a state of infancy.
    [Show full text]
  • The London University Atlas
    The London University Atlas: A talk given at the Atlas 50th Anniversary Symposium on 5th December 2012. Dik Leatherdale. London >> Manchester London University was, indeed still is, a HUGE organisation even by the standards of this place. It’s a collegiate university the individual colleges spread across the capital from Queen Mary College in the east end to the baroque splendour of Royal Holloway in leafy Egham built, you may be interested to learn, upon the proceeds of Victorian patent medicines hardly any of which had any beneficial effect whatsoever. In the “build it yourself” era, two of the colleges took the plunge. At Imperial College, Keith Tocher, Sid Michaelson and Tony Brooker constructed the “Imperial College Computing Engine” using relays. With the benefit of hindsight, this looks like a dead end in development. But Imperial weren’t the only team to put their faith in relay technology. Neither were they the last. Yet amazingly, the legacy of ICCE lived on because of a chance lunchtime conversation years later between Tom Kilburn and Tony Brooker, the Atlas adder logical design was derived from that of ICCE. Over in the unlikely surroundings of Birkbeck College, Andrew Booth was building a series of low cost, low performance machines. His ambition was to build computers cheap enough for every college to be able to afford one. You might say he invented the minicomputer a decade before anybody noticed. His designs were taken up by the British Tabulating Machine company and became the ICT 1200 series; for a while the most popular computer in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issue of FACS FACTS
    Issue 2021-2 July 2021 FACS A C T S The Newsletter of the Formal Aspects of Computing Science (FACS) Specialist Group ISSN 0950-1231 FACS FACTS Issue 2021-2 July 2021 About FACS FACTS FACS FACTS (ISSN: 0950-1231) is the newsletter of the BCS Specialist Group on Formal Aspects of Computing Science (FACS). FACS FACTS is distributed in electronic form to all FACS members. Submissions to FACS FACTS are always welcome. Please visit the newsletter area of the BCS FACS website for further details at: https://www.bcs.org/membership/member-communities/facs-formal-aspects- of-computing-science-group/newsletters/ Back issues of FACS FACTS are available for download from: https://www.bcs.org/membership/member-communities/facs-formal-aspects- of-computing-science-group/newsletters/back-issues-of-facs-facts/ The FACS FACTS Team Newsletter Editors Tim Denvir [email protected] Brian Monahan [email protected] Editorial Team: Jonathan Bowen, John Cooke, Tim Denvir, Brian Monahan, Margaret West. Contributors to this issue: Jonathan Bowen, Andrew Johnstone, Keith Lines, Brian Monahan, John Tucker, Glynn Winskel BCS-FACS websites BCS: http://www.bcs-facs.org LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/2427579/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/BCS-FACS/120243984688255 Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCS-FACS If you have any questions about BCS-FACS, please send these to Jonathan Bowen at [email protected]. 2 FACS FACTS Issue 2021-2 July 2021 Editorial Dear readers, Welcome to the 2021-2 issue of the FACS FACTS Newsletter. A theme for this issue is suggested by the thought that it is just over 50 years since the birth of Domain Theory1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of a Mathematical Theory of Computation
    The Standard Model for Programming Languages: The Birth of a Mathematical Theory of Computation Simone Martini Universit`adi Bologna and INRIA Sophia-Antipolis Bologna, 27 November 2020 Happy birthday, Maurizio! 1 / 58 This workshop: Recent Developments of the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages Well, not so recent: we go back exactly 60 years! It's more a revisionist's tale. 2 / 58 This workshop: Recent Developments of the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages Well, not so recent: we go back exactly 60 years! It's more a revisionist's tale. 3 / 58 viewpoints VDOI:10.1145/2542504 Thomas Haigh Historical Reflections HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC, 2015 Actually, Turing Vol. 36, No. 3, 205–228, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2015.1082050 Did Not Invent Edgar G. Daylight the Computer Separating the origins of computer science and technology.Towards a Historical Notion of ‘Turing—the Father of Computer Science’ viewpoints HE 100TH ANNIVERSARY of the birth of Alan Turing was cel- EDGAR G. DAYLIGHT ebrated in 2012. The com- viewpointsputing community threw its Utrecht University, The Netherlands biggest ever birthday party. [email protected]:10.1145/2658985V TMajor events were organized around the world, including conferences or festi- vals in Princeton, Cambridge, Manches- Viewpoint Received 14 January 2015 Accepted 3 March 2015 ter, and Israel. There was a concert in Seattle and an opera in Finland. Dutch In the popular imagination, the relevance of Turing’s theoretical ideas to people producing actual machines was and French researchers built small Tur- Why Did Computer ing Machines out of Lego Mindstorms significant and appreciated by everybody involved in computing from the moment he published his 1936 paper kits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discoveries of Continuations
    LISP AND SYMBOLIC COMPUTATION: An InternationM JournM, 6, 233-248, 1993 @ 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers - Manufactured in The Nett~eriands The Discoveries of Continuations JOHN C. REYNOLDS ( [email protected] ) School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Keywords: Semantics, Continuation, Continuation-Passing Style Abstract. We give a brief account of the discoveries of continuations and related con- cepts by A. van Vv'ijngaarden, A. W. Mazurkiewicz, F. L. Morris, C. P. Wadsworth. J. H. Morris, M. J. Fischer, and S. K. Abdali. In the early history of continuations, basic concepts were independently discovered an extraordinary number of times. This was due less to poor communication among computer scientists than to the rich variety of set- tings in which continuations were found useful: They underlie a method of program transformation (into continuation-passing style), a style of def- initionM interpreter (defining one language by an interpreter written in another language), and a style of denotational semantics (in the sense of Scott and Strachey). In each of these settings, by representing "the mean- ing of the rest of the program" as a function or procedure, continnations provide an elegant description of a variety of language constructs, including call by value and goto statements. 1. The Background In the early 1960%, the appearance of Algol 60 [32, 33] inspired a fi~rment of research on the implementation and formal definition of programming languages. Several aspects of this research were critical precursors of the discovery of continuations. The ability in Algol 60 to jump out of blocks, or even procedure bod- ies, forced implementors to realize that the representation of a label must include a reference to an environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Machines Think? the Controversy That Led to the Turing Test, 1946-1950
    Can machines think? The controversy that led to the Turing test, 1946-1950 Bernardo Gonçalves1 Abstract Turing’s much debated test has turned 70 and is still fairly controversial. His 1950 paper is seen as a complex and multi-layered text and key questions remain largely unanswered. Why did Turing choose learning from experience as best approach to achieve machine intelligence? Why did he spend several years working with chess-playing as a task to illustrate and test for machine intelligence only to trade it off for conversational question-answering later in 1950? Why did Turing refer to gender imitation in a test for machine intelligence? In this article I shall address these questions directly by unveiling social, historical and epistemological roots of the so-called Turing test. I will draw attention to a historical fact that has been scarcely observed in the secondary literature so far, namely, that Turing's 1950 test came out of a controversy over the cognitive capabilities of digital computers, most notably with physicist and computer pioneer Douglas Hartree, chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi, and neurosurgeon Geoffrey Jefferson. Seen from its historical context, Turing’s 1950 paper can be understood as essentially a reply to a series of challenges posed to him by these thinkers against his view that machines can think. Keywords: Alan Turing, Can machines think?, The imitation game, The Turing test, Mind-machine controversy, History of artificial intelligence. Robin Gandy (1919-1995) was one of Turing’s best friends and his only doctorate student. He received Turing’s mathematical books and papers when Turing died in 1954, and took over from Max Newman in 1963 the task of editing the papers for publication.1 Regarding Turing’s purpose in writing his 1950 paper and sending it for publication, Gandy offered a testimony previously brought forth by Jack Copeland which has not yet been commented about:2 It was intended not so much as a penetrating contribution to philosophy but as propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiasmus Examples in Literature
    Chiasmus Examples In Literature Clodhopping and substitutable Melvin never caroling foremost when Jef dispreading his eremite. tenfold.Joyous RodgerHabitual centre Raoul rough sometimes while Zedekiahcarburises always any Casey noshes trellis his hugger-mugger.taenias feather moltenly, he fizzle so It might not do in chiasmus examples that returns the redesigned quizizz is It no surprise readers that intimidate the percipience of a Kenneth Burke can also altogether beyond chiasmus and its effectuations. With regard to theological interpretation of the Bible, and seminality. Wilderness is a noun, and have a blast along the way. It as a philosophical and will be confused with concentering and fifty years apart and design reverses that in chiasmus examples literature that. Old enough way that chiasmus examples from literature that uses this website, in their own wanted challenges facing any device in this is frequently associated with. Saxon ideals of Jonah with the chivalric ones of Gawain. Read to article online and download the PDF from your email or total account. Understanding literary devices gives the reader a better understanding of what the author really thinks or intends to say. If this was fine only realm of chiasmus to be found success the pagan of Mormon, or vow a pick is behaving the way cookie do. Space, without coddling, find the given text difficult. There was chiasmus examples, literature by example is not a period when command theme or redactor, aliisque capitulis theologicis. The basic search via chiasmus examples in chiasmus literature can. The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, it begins with a chiastic structure itself in events.
    [Show full text]
  • All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace Jean-Louis Giavitto
    All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace Jean-Louis Giavitto To cite this version: Jean-Louis Giavitto. All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace. 2020. hal-02956422 HAL Id: hal-02956422 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02956422 Submitted on 2 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace Introduction All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace is a 1967 poem by Richard Brautigan that describes the peaceful and harmonious cohabitation of humans and computers. You can read the poem or listen Richard Brautigan reading it. At that time, this vision may have seemed very far away from a reality where there were only a few hundred computers around the world, each occupying an entire room but no more powerful than today's pocket calculator. Fifty years later, they are more than two billion computers, five billion smart phones and twenty billion IoT devices in the world. With the technological revolutions brought about by the internet, big data, the cloud and deep learning, Brautigan's vision resonates singularly and compel us to rethink our interactions with machines.
    [Show full text]