DOCSLIB.ORG

Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Meyrav, Yoav (Ed.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Meyrav, Yoav (Ed.) www.ssoar.info Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Meyrav, Yoav (Ed.) Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerk / collection Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Meyrav, Y. (Ed.). (2020). Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019. Berlin: De Gruyter. https:// doi.org/10.1515/9783110618839 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-68524-6 Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies Chief Editor Giuseppe Veltri Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Volume Editor Yoav Meyrav The Yearbook is published on behalf of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies ISBN 978-3-11-060332-3 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-061883-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-060737-6 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 Licence. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: XXX Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover image: Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg, Ms Cod. Levy 115, fol. 158r: Maimonides, More Nevukhim, Beginn von Teil III. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com In Memoriam Roi Benbassat Contents Editorial IX Part I: Articles Aryeh Botwinick The Simultaneous GenesisofMonotheism andScepticism in the Jewish Religion 3 MichelaTorbidoni Socratic Impulse, Secular Tendency,and Jewish Emancipation:AComparison between Simone Luzzattoand Moses Mendelssohn 11 Behnam Zolghadr The TheoryofAḥwāland Argumentsagainst the Law of Non-Contradiction 31 Máté Veres The Causes of Epochē: ANoteonStromateis 8.22.1–4 53 Ze’ev Strauss Meister Eckhart Reading Ibn Gabirol’s Fons vitae 65 Giada Coppola ObadiahSforno and the Individual Human Soul 101 José María Sánchez de León Serrano Arnold Geulincx: Scepticism and Mental Holism 125 Avraham Rot Spinoza’sAffective Scepticism 145 Timothy Franz What wasMaimon After? His Metaphysical Foundations of NaturalSciencein 1790 173 Michah Gottlieb Does Judaism Have Dogma? Moses Mendelssohn and aPivotal Nineteenth- Century Debate 219 VIII Contents Anne Fiebig From Scepticism to Toleranceof“the Other”:The Example of Yeshayahu Leibowitz 243 GiuseppeVeltri Jesuit Strategic Scepticism toward Religious Self-Consciousness and Commonalities: Chinese Muslims, Jews, and Christians in the Eyes of Matteo Ricci(1552–1610) and His “Translator” NicolasTrigault (1557–1628) 265 Part II: Reports Activities and Events 281 compiled by Maria Wazinski SilkeSchaeper Report on the LibraryofJewish Scepticism 303 Editorial The Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies2019 is the fourth vol- ume of articles stemmingfrom research conducted by MCAS’sfellows and affiliates. It also includes asection with an overviewofthe activities and events conductedat the centre duringits fourth academic year and areport on its library. The twelve articles contained in the present volume exhibit the extent to which MCAS scholarship advances the understanding of Judaism and scepticism, both in- dividuallyand together,among different thinkers and within different areas of study. Whether ashortnote or afull-fledged analysis,each paper has something fresh to offer and something new to say, opening new directions of research and inviting the scholarlycommunity to jointhe discussion. Aryeh Botwinick’sopeningessayoutlinesanew and thought-provoking ap- proach to Western thought and religion’sperception of itself. Instead of anarrative of conflict,Botwinick’shistoriosophyraises the notion of God’sunknowability as the mediating thread thatrenders monotheism and scepticism fundamentallyinter- twined. Michela Torbidoni’sstudy adds an important chapter to the as-yetunderstudied history of the persona and function of Socrateswithin the Jewish tradition. Focusing on the cases of Moses Mendelssohn and Simone Luzzatto, who operated at different times and in different contexts, she tantalisingly argues that the figure of Socrates can be considered as avehicle for Jewishemancipation. The comparative discussion adds evidence to the thesis that modern Jewish Italian culturewas part of the intel- lectualbasis of the programme to reform the statusofEuropean Jews in the late eighteenthcentury. BehnamZolghadr tackles one of the cornerstonesofAristotelianlogic—namely, the principle of non-contradiction—by presentingcritiques of it as reported by the Muslim theologian Faḫral-Dīnal-Rāzī (d. 1210). Zolghadr argues thatthese critiques, which can be traced back to the Muʿtazilite mutakallimūn,function as part of its con- solidation of the theory of states(aḥwāl), which can consequentlyberegarded as a dialetheic theory.Assuch, Zolghadr devises the first steps in modelling it logically using tools of paraconsistent logic developed in the late twentieth century,more than athousand years after the theory’sinception. Máté Veres enrichesthe understanding of ancientscepticism by exploring Clem- ent of Alexandria’sdiscussion of epochē (suspension of judgment) in his Stromateis. He examines and refines arguments thatsupport the claim thatClement is present- ing avariety of scepticism thatpredates the well-known version expounded by Sex- tus Empiricusand considers different explanations as to whyaChristian theologian of Clement’sstandingwould express interestinsceptical arguments, let alone recog- nise theirpotential legitimacy. OpenAccess. ©2020, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the CreativeCommons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618839-001 X Editorial Ze’ev Strauss offers the first comprehensive scholarlywork in English on Meister Eckhart’semployment of IbnGabirol’s Fons vitae. He shows the vast extent to which Eckhart drawsonthis work, explicitlyand also implicitly,inorder to account for his own Christian philosophy, primarilygravitating towards IbnGabirol’smetaphysics of the One. Strauss shows that manyofthe provocative and unusual elements of Eck- hart’sChristian thoughtcorrespond to Eckhart’sfavourable view of Fons vitae. Giada Coppola elucidates Obadiah Sforno’s(?1475–1550) philosophicalinterpre- tation of the individual human soul in his Lightofthe Nations,with emphasis on his defence of its immortality.Coppola shows how exegetical interpretation and the text’sphilosophical background are intrinsically connected, identifies Sforno’ssour- ces common to the Hebrew and Latin traditions, and displays the interesting dynam- ics between Sforno’sphilosophical composition and his biblical commentaries. José MaríaSánchez de León Serrano offers anew reading of the Flemish thinker Arnold Geulincx (1624–69)based on an audacious interpretation of his epistemolog- ical views. By tracing the central tenetsofGeulincx’sthought back to his method of self-inspection, SánchezdeLeónSerrano illuminatesthe unity and systematic char- acter of this multifaceted philosopher—who at first glanceseems to offer an incoher- ent blend of scepticism and metaphysics—and opens up new vistas in the studyof this stillwidelyoverlooked thinker. Avraham Rot’spaper offers an original and challenging interpretation of Spi- noza’sphilosophical project,arguing that if one shifts the focus of analysis from his theory of knowledge to his theory of affects, Spinoza emergesasaphilosopher whose scepticism is significantlymoreradical than its Cartesian counterpart.Rot claims that for Spinoza, the doubt that matters is not doubt as amethodological de- vice employed to attain certainty,but rather the doubt that human beingsconstantly experience insofarasthey are finite, embodied, and uncertain of their future. TimothyFranz offers ahighlydetailed, in-depth analysis of Solomon Maimon’s seldom-studied Weltseele (1790), which he describes as aproto-dialectical metaphy- sics of the absolute. Beyond exploring the Weltseele on its own terms, Franz identi- fies it as akey stageinMaimon’sphilosophical development and argues that it func- tions as an attempt to overcome the self-conceivedfailure of Maimon’swell-known Essay on Transcendental Philosophy. In turn, the ideas in the Weltseele wereaban- doned,although not before they exposed the need to construct alogic of the abso- lute, which was ultimatelyexpressed in Maimon’s Logik (1794). Michah Gottlieb’scontribution does much to clarify the debate surroundingJu- daism and dogma as reflected in German-speaking Jewishauthors in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, showing thatitisnot merelyatheoretical question, but also has much to do with concrete considerations concerning Jewish society.Hebe- gins with athorough analysis of Moses Mendelssohn’sview of Judaism, explaining in what sense it should be understood as anti-dogmatic and also how it reflects Men- delssohn’saspiration for aself-conception
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tolerance & Intolerance
    Initiative für Toleranzforschung TOLERANCE & INTOLERANCE AS CHALLENGE IN PAST AND PRESENT | CONFERENCE | 27–29 MARCH 2019 PROGRAMME WEDNESDAY MARCH 27TH 2019 15:00-15:30 WELCOMING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTION Giuseppe Veltri (University of Hamburg) and Jörg Rüpke (University of Erfurt) PANEL 1 15:30-16:30 CONCEPTUALIZING TOLERANCE What Toleration Is Not David Heyd (Philosophy, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) The Disapproval-Respect Model of Tolerance: a Social Psychological Approach Bernd Simon (Political Psychology, University of Kiel) 16:30-17:00 Coffee Break PANEL 2 17:00-18:30 TOLERANCE WITHIN RELIGIOUS CONTEXT AND URBAN ENVIROMENT Basis for Toleration in the Roman Word Mar Marcos Sánchez (Ancient History, History of Religion, University of Cantabria) Tolerance and Urban Religion Jörg Rüpke (Comparative Religious Studies, University of Erfurt) Theology of Stones. Reflections on the Christian City and the Place of Religious Minorities Christiana Facchini (History of Christianity and Religious Studies, University of Bologna) 19:30 Dinner (Restaurant) THURSDAY MARCH 28TH 2019 9:00-12:30 Time to visit Hamburg (guided tour or free) 12:30 Lunch (Schlueterstrasse 51) PANEL 3 13:00-15:30 TOLERANCE IN JEWISH AND ISLAMIC TRADITION Tolerance in the Fatimid Empire (909-1171) Serena Tolino (Islamic Studies, University of Hamburg) Between Belief and Unbelief: Paradigms of Tolerance in al-Ghazālī, Ibn Rushd, and Isaac Albalag Bakinaz Abdalla (Jewish Studies, MC Gill University) Institut für Jüdische Philosophie und Religion | Schlüterstraße 51 | 20146
    [Show full text]
  • 'On Parchment, with Wooden Boards': Hebrew and Non-Hebrew Terms
    The Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures (CSMC) and the Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion cordially invite you to the workshop ‘On Parchment, with Wooden Boards’: Hebrew and Non-Hebrew Terms Applied to Jewish Books in Historical Perspective Monday, 26 July, 02:00 pm–05:30 pm CEST Tuesday, 27 July, 02:00 pm–05:00 pm CEST Zoom-Meeting The title or the incipit of a book have always been a common means to refer to its textual content, leaving aside its material appearance. Yet, historical sources, like contracts, let- ters, and book lists of Jewish libraries, to mention just a few, reveal a great variety of terms related to the material and visual aspects of the books, such as volumes, quires, scripts, bindings, etc. In this workshop, we would like to focus on the Hebrew and non- Hebrew terms used to describe Jewish manuscripts and printed books during the medi- eval and early modern periods. The inquiry into the terminology and the language of book descriptions will help us to better understand the actual artefacts to which the terms refer and will shed light on the ways in which Jewish books were perceived and treated as material objects. The main goal of the workshop is to provide a platform for scholars to exchange ideas and problems related to the historical terminology of Jewish books, which hitherto has been not systematically investigated. Cluster of Excellence ‘Understanding Written Artefacts‘ www.csmc.uni-hamburg.de/written-artefacts.html Programme Monday, 26 July, 02:00 pm–05:30 pm 02:00 – 02:10 Giuseppe Veltri
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Philosophy and Religion Universität Hamburg Academic Year 2017/18
    Jewish Philosophy and Religion Universität Hamburg Academic Year 2017/18 Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Jewish Scepticism Emmy Noether Research Group Early Modern Musar Project Project PESHAT SFORNO Jewish Philosophy and Religion Universität Hamburg Academic Year 2017/18 Index 4 Words of Welcome 5 Academic Leadership 7 Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion 10 TEAM 12 MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES 15 Board of Trustees 16 Advisory Board 18 Team 21 Fellowship Programme 2017/2018 49 PRoject PESHAT 53 TEAM 54 Project SFORNO 57 TEAM 58 Emmy Noether Research Group: Early Modern Musar 60 TEAM 61 Associated Project 63 Team: Student Assistants Words of Welcome As in the two previous years, this booklet is intended to inform and update the reader about the research conducted at the Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion at the Universität Hamburg. In this issue, I would like to draw attention to three impressive performances by five members of our research team. Firstly, Daniel Davies, Florian Dunklau, and Michael Engel successfully completed the first three-year funding period of the “PESHAT in Context” project. The project was renewed by the German Research Foundation (DFG) for a second three-year period. It is planned to run for twelve years. Secondly, I am pleased to announce that Patrick B. Koch has been accepted to the Emmy Noether Programme run by the German Research Foundation. He will establish a research group dealing with the topic “Jewish Moralistic Writings (Musar) of the Early Modern Period: 1600–1800.” The group will consist of four junior researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ground Floor of Judaism: Scepticism and Certainty in Moses
    Ze’ev Strauss The Ground Floor of Judaism: Scepticismand Certainty in Moses Mendelssohn’s Jerusalem Introduction One of the central themes that Moses Mendelssohn’s Jerusalemoder über religiöse Machtund Judentum (Jerusalem or on Religious Power and Judaism)ispredicated upon is the notion of doubt.Yet in Jerusalem, Mendelssohn seems to employ not just one type, but rather awide array of varyingmodes of doubt. The following paper will set out to exploreMendelssohn’sequivocalapplication of doubtinJerusa- lem,and in so doing endeavour to demonstrate that he, despite his rather unfavour- able view of scepticism as a ‘disease of the soul’ (‘Krankheit der Seele’),¹ nonetheless drawsheavilyonit. Indeed, this is by no meansaforeign topic to Jewish thought: Alreadyinthe first century CE, the JewishPlatonist Philo of Alexandria resorted to Neo-Pyrrhonian and New Academicscepticism to substantiatethe ultimatemeta- physical truth of Jewish Scripture.² Similarly, we also find references to philosophical scepticism in the work of the medieval Jewish thinker Judah Halevi (1075 – 1141)and the Venetian Rabbi Simone Luzzatto (?1582–1663).³ Furthermore, the Jewish intellec- tual tradition can be understood as aconstant interplaybetween scepticism and dog- Moses Mendelssohn, JerusalemoronReligious Powerand Judaism,trans. Allan Arkus,Introduction and Commentary by Alexander Altmann (New England: University Press of New England, 1983): 66–67;idem, Jerusalemoder über religiöse Macht und Judentum,in, idem, Gesammelte Schriften. Ju- biläumsausgabe (JubA), vol. 8, eds.Ismar Elbogen, Julius Guttmann,Eugen Mittwoch, Alexander Alt- mann, EvaJ.Engel and Daniel Krochmalnik (Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1983): 134.Gideon Freudenthal has alreadypointed this out in his No Religion without Idolatry (Indiana: University of NotreDame Press, 2012): 22, 41– 42.Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Introduction Author(S): DANIEL R. LANGTON Source: Melilah: Atheism, Scepticism and Challenges to Monotheism, Vol. 12 (201
    EDITOR Daniel R. Langton ASSISTANT EDITOR Simon Mayers Title: Introduction Author(s): DANIEL R. LANGTON Source: Melilah: Atheism, Scepticism and Challenges to Monotheism, Vol. 12 (2015), pp. 1-4 Published by: University of Manchester and Gorgias Press URL: http://www.melilahjournal.org/p/2015.html ISBN: 978-1-4632-0622-2 ISSN: 1759-1953 A publication of the Centre for Jewish Studies, University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Co-published by INTRODUCTION This volume attempts to make a modest contribution to the historical study of Jewish doubt, focusing on the encounter between atheistic and sceptical modes of thought and the religion of Judaism. Along with related philosophies including philosophical materialism and scientific naturalism, atheism and scepticism are amongst the most influential intellectual trends in Western thought and society. As such, they represent too important a phenomenon to ignore in any study of religion that seeks to locate the latter within the modern world. For scholars of Judaism and the Jewish people, the issue is even more pressing in that for Jews, famously, the categories of religion and ethnicity blur so that it makes sense to speak of non-Jewish Jews many of whom have historically been indifferent or even hostile to religion. Strictly speaking, Jewish engagement with atheism (i.e. disbelief in God’s existence) can scarcely be found before the modern period, unless one expands the definition to include biblical condemnations of practical atheism (i.e. non-observance), and Jewish attraction to ancient world beliefs that might be said to have challenged the idea of Jewish monotheism. Of course, there were also debates about the existence of others’ gods (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Socratic Impulse, Secular Tendency, and Jewish Emancipation
    Michela Torbidoni Socratic Impulse, Secular Tendency,and JewishEmancipation: AComparison between Simone Luzzattoand Moses Mendelssohn 1Introduction Since antiquity,the legendary figure of Socrates has embodied the human desire for knowledge,and since the earliest theological controversies, he has symbolised the first authentic freethinker as wellasavictim of social and religious intolerance. The role of Socrates as arepresentative of secular knowledge within the framework of the struggle between philosophyand revelation was greatlythematised during the eighteenth century,which celebrated him as aparadigmofreason, amodel of secular virtue, “certainlynot an atheist one, but one which was independent of the dogmas of the priests, […]the archetype of the free thinker in matters of faith.”¹ Forthis reason, the character of Socrates was imbued with anew secular pie- tas,which must be considered asignificant expression of the Enlightenment’scon- cerns about the question of religion. AccordingtoLeo Strauss, the Socratic philosophical method reflects the original meaning of the term as away of life devoted to the realm of knowledge and asearch for the truth. Strauss makes adistinction between this concept of philosophyand that of philosophyasamassofdoctrines and asystem established by history.² In his view,Socrates’sphilosophyembodies the term’soriginal meaning because it con- sists on the one hand of an awareness of human ignorance towards fundamental is- sues and on the other of the eros which prompts inquiry and the search for the truth. And indeed, an awareness of the uncertainty of anysolution and of our ignoranceof the main aspects of philosophicalinquiry is the main feature of the philosopher’s search for truth and his wayoflife; namely, away of life that is incompatible with the biblical one.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Scepticism 1
    1 MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES – JEWISH SCEPTICISM 3 A few words of welcome … 5 Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 6 Board of Trustees 8 Advisory Board 9 Scientific Leadership and Academic Staff 10 Research Associates 12 Current Fellows 17 Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion 28 Research Associates 29 PESHAT in Context 32 Research Associates 34 SFORNO Project 36 Research Associates 38 Support Staff 40 The grand opening of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies takes place on October 29, 2015, in the Atrium of the Staats- und Universitätsbi- bliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky. 5 When speaking about Jewish scepticism, I often like to begin with a story from the Babylonian Talmud which illustrates the Rabbinic approach to authority. Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Joshua were discussing a problem in Jewish law, a halakhic problem. After delivering many arguments in favour of his own legal interpretation, Rabbi Eliezer invoked the authority of Heaven. To this Rabbi Joshua exclaimed ‘It is not in Heaven!’. According to Rabbi Joshua there was no need to pay heed to a heavenly voice, since the Jewish written law, the Torah, had been given at Mount Sinai. And since it was God himself who had written the Torah, ‘after the majority must one incline’. And how did God react to Rabbi Joshua‘s argument, according to the Rabbinic tradition? He laughed and said: ‘My sons have defeated Me, My sons have defeated Me’. Autonomy is at the basis of the process of interpretating a text. In this process, dialo- gue and questions are essential, as explained in the parable about the four children from the Passover Haggadah: the wise son, the wicked son, the simple one, and the one who does not know how to ask questions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Principles of Jewish Skeptical Thought. the Case of Judah Moscato and Simone Luzzatto
    2. PRINCIPLES OF JEWISH SKEPTICAL THOUGHT. THE CASE OF JUDAH MOSCATO AND SIMONE LUZZATTO Giuseppe Veltri In the last century, the study of skepticism enjoyed a spirited aca- demic interest and enthusiastic popularity. Ancient Eastern and West- ern schools of skeptical thought and philosophy have been the subjects of numerous tractates, books, articles, and prises de position; nor is there any doubt that not only were the historical Pyrrhonian philosophy and the classical academies analyzed and described, but the currents of skeptical method in the Middle Ages and the Early Modern period were also the objects of substantial investigation. Moreover, much secondary interest has been devoted to the study of ancient, medieval, and early modern Jewish skepticism. The entry of Alvin J. Reines in the old and new editions of the Encyclopaedia Judaica refers only to the fideist question of the unreliability of reason, and he quotes Judah Halevy and asdai Crescas on the inadequacy of neo-Platonic and Aristotelian physics and metaphysics as naturally acquired knowledge.1 However,—he comments—“in their refutations of Neoplatonic Aristotelianism, Judah Halevy and Crescas relied on reason and assumed the validity of empirical knowledge.”2 Skepticism is seen here, consequently, only as an argument to reinforce divine revelation. Reines mentions no other movement for the entire history of Jewish philosophy. 1 Alvin J. Reines, “Skeptics and Skepticism,” Encyclopaedia Judaica, ed. Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik, 2nd ed., vol. 18 (Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007), 657–658. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 9 June 2010. 2 Ibidem. 16 giuseppe veltri With some rare exceptions3 concerned mainly with Uriel da Costa,4 Aaron d’Antan,5 Salomon Maimon,6 or the everlasting question of whether and how the biblical book of Qohelet should be included in the history of skepticism,7 there is little on Jewish skeptical thought on academic shelves.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Einheit Von Wissenschaft Und Religion. Die Herausforderung Einer Wissenschaft Des Judentums
    THOMAS MEYER Die Einheit von Wissenschaft und Religion. Die Herausforderung einer Wissenschaft des Judentums Vorspiel – Versuch einer Begriffsklärung 48 zweispaltige Seiten macht der von fünf verschiedenen Autoren verfasste Eintrag „Philosophy, Jewish“ in der 2007 erschienenen, zweiten Edition der „Encyclopedia Judacia“ aus, die zeitgleich in den USA und Israel publiziert wurde. Der für die Einführung in das Thema verantwortlich zeichnende Raphael Jospe schreibt dort unter dem Stichwort „What is Jewish Philoso- phy?“: „Jewish philosophy is described or defined in various ways, depending on the philosopher’s or historian’s understanding of both Judaism and philosophy. In general, the question of ,what is Jewish philosophy?‘ would have been alien to medieval Jewish philosophers, who saw themselves as engaging not in some- thing particularly ,Jewish‘ in a cultural sense, but in philosophy as a science, in- deed as the ,mother of sciences‘.”1 Damit ist der Ton der folgenden Ausführungen angeschlagen. Die Frage nach dem „Was“ Jüdischer Philosophie ist in der Moderne selbst fragwürdig ge- worden. Die „Alten“ mussten die Frage nicht stellen, weil sie noch wussten, was Philosophie war, nämlich, wie seit Aristoteles festgelegt: Wissenschaft. Konsequenterweise werden die Antworten auf die Frage allesamt von Autoren des 20. Jahrhunderts gegeben. Anschließend unterscheidet Jospe Definitionen der Zusammensetzung „jü- dische Philosophie“, die sie als Oxymoron betrachten, sie als biographische, religiöse oder literarische Zuschreibung verstehen. Abgegrenzt werden diese Antworten von jenen, die eine Harmonisierung von Philosophie und Judentum zum maßgeblichen Kriterium machen – oder aber essentialistische bzw. tradi- tionelle Literatur einschließende, kontextualisierende Lesarten bevorzugen. Jospe ist sich darüber klar, dass das angewandte Schema grob ist, und bringt daher noch die eine oder andere Feinunterscheidung, ohne das sich am Befund etwas ändern würde: Jüdische Philosophie ist als Begriff im 20.
    [Show full text]
  • From Philosophy to Kabbalah: Yeḥiyel Nissim of Pisa and the Critique of Aristotelianism
    ItalIan Jewry In the early Modern era essays in Intellectual history Perspectives in Jewish Intellectual life Series Editor: Giuseppe Veltri (University of Hamburg) ItalIan Jewry In the early Modern era essays in Intellectual history alessandro Guetta Boston 2014 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A catalog record for this book as available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2014 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved Effective November 16, 2016, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. ISBN 978-1-61811-208-8 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-61811-209-5 (electronic) Cover design by Ivan Grave Published by Academic Studies Press in 2014 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Contents Acknowledgments .......................................6 Introduction ............................................8 1: From Philosophy to Kabbalah: Yeḥiyel Nissim of Pisa and the Critique of Aristotelianism ....12 2: Can Fundamentalism be Modern? The Case of Avraham Portaleone, the Repentant Scientist .....30 3: Allegorical Space and Geometrical Space: Representations of the Temple of Jerusalem in the Works of Italian Jewish Authors ..............................62 4: The Myth of
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Prosperity and Decline in Early Modern Jewish Political Thought Vasileios Syros Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America Columbia University
    Mercati ex Machina: Economic Prosperity and Decline in Early Modern Jewish Political Thought Vasileios Syros Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America Columbia University he foundations of a vigorous economy, the influence of trade on politics, the importance of religious tolerance for economic success, and the deleterious repercus- sions of religious conflict have been issues of enduring importance in European politi- Tcal thought since the Renaissance. One political thinker who set the tenor for responses to these questions was Giovanni Botero (1544–1617), a Piedmontese ex-Jesuit who rose to fame for his endeavor to harmonize Niccolò Machiavelli’s (1469–1527) political teachings with the princi- ples of the Christian faith, thus generating a new line of political thinking generally subsumed under the rubric “reason of state” (ragion di stato). Another key aspect of Botero’s political and economic theory, as developed in his On the Causes of the Greatness and Magnificence of Cities and colored by his experience serving the Church and various Italian and Spanish rulers, concerns the principal factors that promote the greatness, magnificence, and economic glory of the state. While previous literature has noted affinities between Botero’s ideas and early modern Jewish perceptions of political and economic greatness and decline, the main thrust of this essay is to take a fresh look at Italian Jewish discourse on the formation of the state, the components of greatness, and the causes of decline in a comparative context. Specifically, I attempt a detailed exploration of the ways in which major figures of Jewish intellectual life such as Botero’s Venetian contemporaries Leon Modena (1571–1648) and Simone Luzzatto (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Giuseppe Veltri, Eine Tora Für Den König Talmai—Untersuchungen
    178 BOOK REVIEWS Giuseppe Veltri, Eine Tora für den König Talmai— Untersuchungen zum Überset­ zungsverständnis in der jüdisch-hellenistischen und rabbinischen Literatur. Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum 41, herausgegeben von Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1994, pp. xi + 289. ISSN 0179-7891. This abbreviated version of Veltri’s 1991 dissertation for the Freie Universität in Berlin, guided by Ρ. Schäfer, deals with the evaluation of and references to biblical translations in rabbinic and Jewish-Hellenistic sources, especially the LXX. This is an extremely detailed book, providing not only the rabbinic and Jewish-Hellenistic sources themselves, but also extensive analyses of these sources and of the Forschungsgeschichte on them. The book is written in a very professional, thor­ ough, and original way, and will undoubtedly become the standard work on this topic, which has wider implications than one would think at first thought. Although this is a very extensive book (289 pp.), it actually seeks to solve mainly one question which is posed on p. 18, and the answer to which is provided in the summary on pp. 215-19, although the author’s views are also expressed throughout the book (e.g., pp. 107-12). This question, as explained in the introduction (pp. 1-18), is to show that all scholars before Veltri have wrongly embraced the view that the Jews rejected the LXX, either because the Christians had adopted that version or because they were op­ posed to the hellenization of other cultures by King Ptolemy who had the Hebrew Bible translated into Greek for precisely this purpose.
    [Show full text]