DOCSLIB.ORG

Professor of Jewish Philosophy and Religion; Stephan Schmid Is Professor of the History of Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Professor of Jewish Philosophy and Religion; Stephan Schmid Is Professor of the History of Philosophy Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Jewish Scepticism Project PESHAT Jewish Philosophy and Religion Jewish Philosophy and Religion Project SFORNO University of Hamburg Academic Year 2016 / 17 Index 4 Words of Welcome 5 Scientific Leadership 8 Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion 11 TEAM 14 MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES 17 Board of Trustees 18 Advisory Board 19 Team 25 Fellowship Programme 2016/2017 52 PRoject PESHAT 55 TEAM 57 Project SFORNO 60 TEAM 62 Associated Project 65 Student Assistants 3 Words of Welcome In the academic year 2016–2017, we are celebrating the third anniversary of the Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion. Much has happened since our founding. The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) has granted funding for the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies (MCAS) and the Sforno project. The ‘PESHAT in Context’ project began its work at the University of Hamburg. The team has grown from two members in April 2014 to twenty in November 2016. Two professors have been appointed, and they also serve as co-directors of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies: Racheli Haliva is the new junior professor of Jewish philosophy and religion; Stephan Schmid is professor of the history of philosophy. In October 2016, the Faculty of Humanities introduced a Master’s programme in Jewish Philosophy and Religion, the first of its kind in Germany. The Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies has successfully completed its first year of activity, full of vivid discussions, debates, workshops, dialectical and reading evenings, and, of course, research into Jewish philosophical and cultural scepticism. With this second edition of the booklet, we would like to give the reader an overview of the wide variety of projects, activities, and research conducted in the field of Jewish philosophy and religion at the University of Hamburg. I would like to take the opportunity to thank those who have made the Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion, the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies, the PESHAT and Sforno project possible: The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for the generous financial support, the President of the University of Hamburg, Professor Dieter Lenzen, the University’s Vice Presidents, Professor Jetta Frost and Professor Susanne Rupp, the Chancellor of the University, Martin Hecht, the Dean of the Faculty of Humanities, Professor Oliver Huck, Professor Michael Friedrich from the Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures, Professor Benjamin Schnieder from the Department of Philosophy, and Professor Anselm Steiger from the Graduate School for Research into Trans- and Interdenominational Permeability for supporting the establishment of an Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion at the University of Hamburg, the members of the Advisory Board and Board of Trustees of the Maimonides Centre for their advice and the administrative staff for supporting us with the day-to-day business. I would like to express my special thanks to my team for their great dedication, engagement and enthusiasm. I hope you find this booklet informative and inspiring. Giuseppe Veltri Hamburg, November 2016 5 Giuseppe Veltri Giuseppe Veltri was appointed professor at the newly established Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion at the University of Hamburg in April 2014. From 1997–2014, he held the chair of Ju- daic/Jewish Studies at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg. His research interests are the religion of ancient Judaism, medieval philosophy, the culture and philosophy of the Renais- sance and Early Modern period, and the Wissenschaft des Judentums [Jewish Studies]. Giuseppe Veltri has devoted much of his research to the study of Renaissance philosophy and religious views. He received funding from the DFG to translate and publish the philosophical sermons of Yehudah Moscato and has organised several conferences and symposia on Jewish intellectual life during the Early Modern period, both in Italy and elsewhere. Giuseppe Veltri also headed another DFG-funded research project about this period: the preparation of an edition of the works of Simone Luzzatto. In January 2013, Giuseppe Veltri was elected a corresponding member of the Accademia Pontaniana, Naples, and in February 2014 he was elected an ordinary member of the Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz. Giuseppe Veltri has published monographs and articles in a number of languages. His most re- cent publications are Mirror of Rabbinic Hermeneutics. Studies in Religion, Magic, and Language Theory in Ancient Judaism (2015) and Language of Conformity and Dissent: On the Imaginative Grammar of Jewish Intellectuals in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (2013). Professor of Jewish Philosophy and Religion MCAS Director Scientific Leadership 6 Racheli Haliva Racheli Haliva has been a junior professor and one of the co-directors at the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies since December 2015. She earned her PhD at McGill University in Montreal in 2015. Her dissertation entitled ‘Isaac Polqar—A Jewish Philosopher or a Philosopher and a Jew? A Study of the Relationship between Philosophy and Religion in Isaac Polqar’s ʿEzer ha-Dat [In Support of Religion] and Teshuvat Apikoros [A Response to the Heretic]’ was completed under the supervision of Professor Carlos Fraenkel and Professor Lawrence Kaplan. She is currently focused on composing a book based on her dissertation. Her main interests are Jewish Averroism, medieval Jewish and Islamic philoso- phy, political philosophy, the philosophy of religion, and Jewish converts in the Middle Ages. Junior Professor of Jewish At the Maimonides Centre, she is currently focus- Philosophy and ing on scepticism and anti-scepticism in me- Religion dieval Jewish philosophy. In particular, she MCAS Co-Director is concentrating on the Jewish Averroist school, whose members’ key challenge was to reconcile Ibn Rushd’s confident ra- tionalism with Maimonides’ scepticism. The Jewish Averroists sought to re-estab- lish the authority of Aristotelian philosophy as taught by Ibn Rushd and to reconcile it with the principles of Judaism. Since they also saw themselves as the intellectual heirs of Maimon- ides with regard to the philosophical interpretation of Judaism, they needed to respond to the sceptical elements in Maimonides’ thought. Scientific Leadership 7 Stephan Schmid Stephan Schmid is professor of the history of philosophy at the Philosophy Department at the University of Hamburg and one of the co-directors of the Maimonides Centre. He joined the Department and the Centre in August 2016, coming from the Humboldt University Berlin, where he worked, under the supervision of Professor Dominik Perler, on early modern epistemology and metaphysics (in particular on early modern conceptions of ideas and teleology) and on late Scholastic metaphysics (in particular on Francisco Suárez’s theory of causation and modality). Stephan Schmid’s historical interests are late-medieval and early modern philosophy, and he is particularly intrigued by transformations of philosophical ideas and theories in these peri- od, which often take a much more complex line than assumed. Systematically, he is interested in (big) epistemological and metaphysical questions such as questions about the intelligibility of reality, the nature of intentionality, and the metaphysics of modality. At the Maimonides Centre, Stephan Schmid will work on a two- tiered project on rationalism and scepticism in Spinoza and Mai- mon. As a first step, the project reconstructs Spinoza’s anti-scepticism on the basis of his adherence to the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) and its semantic founda- tions. As a second step, the project Professor will be concerned with Salomon Mai- mon’s adaption of Spinoza’s radi- of the History cal rationalism and will explore his of Philosophy sceptical conclusions. The fundamen- MCAS Co-Director tal question of his project is: why did Spinoza think that we can defeat the scep- tic on the basis of the PSR, while Maimon thought that radical rationalism undermines the possibility of any empirical knowledge for finite beings and thus inevitably dooms us to scep- ticism? Scientific Leadership 8 The Institute for Jewish Philosophy and Religion In April 2014, the University of Hamburg founded a Chair for Jewish Philosophy and Religion with the appointment of Professor Giuseppe Veltri. For the first time in its history, this University has created a framework for the academic study of Judaism, fostering interdisciplinary collabora- tion across the fields of Jewish studies, philosophy, Early Modern period studies, and manuscript studies. The Institute is part of the Department of Philosophy and operates in close cooperation with researchers and fellows based at the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies and with the teams running the PESHAT and Sforno projects. The Institute is building a research collection of source material and secondary literature in He- brew and Jewish studies, with special emphasis on Jewish philosophy and religion. In building the collection, the Institute works in close collaboration with the Central Library for Philosophy, Classics, and History and the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies. Books, periodicals, and access to full-text databases are available on-site to members of the University of Hamburg and guests. Teaching and research are supported by Hamburg’s good library re- sources in the fields of Hebrew and Jewish studies, and specialist
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Readings on the Encounter Between Jewish Thought and Early Modern Science
    HISTORY 449 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA W 3:30pm-6:30 pm Fall, 2016 GOD AND NATURE: READINGS ON THE ENCOUNTER BETWEEN JEWISH THOUGHT AND EARLY MODERN SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR: David B. Ruderman OFFICE HRS: M 3:30-4:30 pm;W 1:00-2:00 OFFICE: 306b College Hall Email: [email protected] SOME GENERAL WORKS ON THE SUBJECT: Y. Tzvi Langerman, "Jewish Science", Dictionary of the Middle Ages, 11:89-94 Y. Tzvi Langerman, The Jews and the Sciences in the Middle Ages, 1999 A. Neher, "Copernicus in the Hebraic Literature from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century," Journal History of Ideas 38 (1977): 211-26 A. Neher, Jewish Thought and the Scientific Revolution of the Sixteenth Century: David Gans (1541-1613) and His Times, l986 H. Levine, "Paradise not Surrendered: Jewish Reactions to Copernicus and the Growth of Modern Science" in R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, eds. Epistemology, Methodology, and the Social Sciences (Boston, l983), pp. 203-25 H. Levine, "Science," in Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought, eds. A. Cohen and P. Mendes-Flohr, l987, pp. 855-61 M. Panitz, "New Heavens and a New Earth: Seventeenth- to Nineteenth-Century Jewish Responses to the New Astronomy," Conservative Judaism, 40 (l987-88); 28-42 D. Ruderman, Kabbalah, Magic, and Science: The Cultural Universe of a Sixteenth- Century Jewish Physician, l988 D. Ruderman, Science, Medicine, and Jewish Culture in Early Modern Europe, Spiegel Lectures in European Jewish History, 7, l987 D. Ruderman, Jewish Thought and Scientific Discovery in Early Modern Europe, 1995, 2001 D. Ruderman, Jewish Enlightenment in an English Key: Anglo-Jewry’s Construction of Modern Jewish Thought, 2000 D.
    [Show full text]
  • David Ricardo's Sefarad
    David Ricardo’s Sefarad Sergio Cremaschi Former Professor of Moral Philosophy Amedeo Avogadro University (Alessandria, Novara, Vercelli) ESHET XXII Conference Madrid 7-9 June 2018 1. A blind spot in Ricardo’s biography This paper is meant to be a contribution to a reconstruction of an aspect of Ricardo’s biography, namely the history of his shifting religious affiliations with their biographical, intellectual and political implications. Here I examine the first 21 years of his life, when he was a child in a London Sephardi household and, from the age of 13, a member of the Bevis Mark congregation. My aim is – given the scarcity of primary sources – to add something to the accounts available (Sraffa 1955, 16-43 and 54-61; Heertje 1970; 1975; 2015; Weatherall 1976, 1-21; Henderson 1997, 51-154) by taking advantage of two tools by which to squeeze a bit more out of scant documents. The first is a contextual approach, made possible now by excellent work that has been done by historians on eighteenth-century Anglo-Judaism. The second is pragmatic interpretation of utterances recorded in documents, a technique that may be learned from the no less valuable work done by philosophers of language, one of Sraffa’s close friends no less than the whole Oxford philosophy which the latter did not appreciate too much, John Austin, John Searle and Paul Grice. I contend, first, that something more may be learnt on Ricardo’s formative years, on religion, moral education, intellectual interests awakened and competences acquired, than Sraffa and other biographers
    [Show full text]
  • How Not to Make Halakhic Rulings
    How Not to Make Halakhic Rulings Byline: Rabbi Daniel Sperber How Not to Make Halakhic Rulings * Daniel Sperber Introduction In a series of articles and publications I discussed the question of how halakhic decisors (poskim) should act in our day and age, arguing that they should seek to bring people closer to a love of Judaism and halakha, to be inclusive rather than exclusive, and to practice what I called "friendly decision making" (pesikah yedidutit). I am wont to quote a passage from R. Aryeh Leib Friedman's Tzidkat ha-Tzadik (undated, but after 1953), p.115: How much responsibility and caution one requires in interpreting halakha when it comes to real life. How serious and terrifying is the thought of permitting the prohibited.... But clearly it is no less serious and aweful to prohibit the permitted; as we say in the Vidui ha-Gadol, "That which you declared guilty we declared innocent, and that which you declared innocent we declared guilty." And so it is stated in Yerushalmi Terumot 4.3: "R. Eleazar said: Just as it is forbidden to purify the impure, so too it is forbidden to declare the pure impure." Thus, one must always take into account the implications of one's ruling, how much pain and anguish it may cause, weigh the relevant aspects involved in the issue, and seek out a way to find a suitable solution which will bring spiritual satisfaction to the questioners. Of course, we will not always be able to satisfy our "clients" with a "happy reply." But at least we should always try our hardest to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • E D I T O R I a L
    E D I T O R I A L “RETRO-PROGRESSING” As one browses through the history section of a library, one of the volumes that is likely to catch one’s attention is The Discoverers by Daniel Boorstin.1 It is an impressive, 700-page volume. Published in 1983, it chronicles in a semi-popular style selected aspects of man’s discoveries. Two chapters entitled “The Prison of Christian Dogma” and “A Flat Earth Returns” deal with the outlandish con- cept of an earth that is flat instead of spherical. Boorstin has impressive academic credentials from Harvard and Yale, and has held prestigious positions such as the Librarian of Congress, Director of the National Museum of History and Tech- nology, and Senior Historian of the Smithsonian Institution. In The Discoverers he reflects the popular view that the ancient Greeks, including Aristotle and Plato, believed Earth to be a sphere; however, after the rise of Christianity a period of “scholarly amnesia” set in which lasted from around 300 to 1300 A.D. During this time, according to Boorstin, “Christian faith and dogma replaced the useful [spherical] image of the world that had been so slowly, so painfully, and so scrupulously drawn by ancient geographers.” The “spherical” view was replaced by the concept of a flat earth, which Boorstin characterizes as “pious caricatures.”2 Boorstin bolsters his case by mentioning a couple of minor writers — Lactantius and Cosmas — who believed in a flat earth and lived during this “dark age.” He also implicates the powerful authority of St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430), who “heartily agreed” that antipodes “could not exist.”3 Antipodes represented lands on the opposite side of a spherical earth where trees and men, if present, would be upside down, with their feet above their heads; hence, the “antipodes” (opposite-feet) designation.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. INTRODUCTION It belongs to the cherished traditions of Western civilization that Judaism “invented” monotheism. In the eyes of most Jews and Christians, as well as numerous scholars of religion, the “monotheistic revolution” of the Hebrew Bible represents a radi- cal break with the backward and underdeveloped abominations of the polytheistic cultures that surrounded—and continuously threatened—ancient Israel. As such, Jewish monotheism is con- sidered to be a decisive step in the development of humanity to- wards ever higher forms of religion. According to the triumphal- istic Christian view of history and its progress-oriented academic counterparts, this “evolution” reached its climax in Christianity (more precisely, in nineteenth-century Protestantism). Just as poly- theism inevitably lead to monotheism, so the remote and stern God of Judaism had to be replaced by the loving God of Chris- tianity. When Christianity adopted Jewish monotheism, it simul- taneously softened it by including the idea of God’s Trinity and his son’s incarnation on earth. Only through this “extension” of strict monotheism, it is argued, could Christianity liberate true faith from Jewish ossification and guarantee its survival and perfection. The notion of the necessary evolution of monotheism out of polytheism is as stereotyped as the conceit of its successful fulfill- ment in Christianity. Regarding the latter, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity can hardly claim, despite the efforts of the church fathers, to manifest the apex of monotheism.
    [Show full text]
  • Reevaluating the Interaction Between Ancient Israel and Greece Mike Tolliver University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses Graduate Works 3-7-2014 The aS ges and Philosophers: Reevaluating the Interaction Between Ancient Israel and Greece Mike Tolliver University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Tolliver, Mike, "The aS ges and Philosophers: Reevaluating the Interaction Between Ancient Israel and Greece" (2014). Theses. 257. http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/257 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Sages and Philosophers: Reevaluating the Interaction Between Ancient Israel and Greece Michael M. Tolliver Th.M., Covenant Theological Seminary, 2013 M.Div., Covenant Theological Seminary, 2010 B.S., Business Administration, Truman State University, 2005 A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Philosophy August 2014 Advisory Committee Jon D. McGinnis, Ph.D. Chairperson David Griesedieck, Ph.D. C. John Collins, Ph.D. Copyright, Michael M. Tolliver, 2014 Abstract: The previously assumed late development of the Jewish sacred writings led many to conclude that the Hellenistic world greatly influenced both the content and worldview of the Hebrew authors. Though the evidence for the historical reconstruction that required the Jewish texts to develop late has been called into question, scholars have yet to reconsider the implications this has for the antiquity of the ideas contained within the Jewish writings and their influence on surrounding cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Models of Jewish Philosophy Submitted for the Degree of Phd in Philosophy at the London School
    Justifying One’s Practices: Two Models of Jewish Philosophy Submitted for the degree of PhD in Philosophy At the London School of Economics and Political Science Daniel Rynhold 2000 1 UMI Number: U120701 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U120701 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 773 ) Thesis Abstract Judaism is a religion that emphasises the importance of a set of practical commandments and in the history of Jewish philosophy various attempts have been made to rationalise or justify these commandments. In this thesis I try to establish a general model for the justification of practices through a critical examination of two such attempted rationalisations. However, the study is framed within the more general question of whether or not there can be such a thing as Jewish Philosophy as a genuinely substantive discipline. Thus, I take the particular topic of rationalising the commandments as a ‘case study’ in order to see whether we can do substantive Jewish philosophy at least in the practical sphere. In the main body of the thesis I look at the methods of rationalisation of Moses Maimonides and Joseph Soloveitchik and argue that despite being based on very different scientific models they share a central methodological presumption that I term the Priority of Theory (PoT).
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Mathematical Revival in Western Europe
    7. Mathematical revival in Western Europe (Burton , 6.2 – 6.4, 7.1 ) Mathematical studies and discoveries during the early Dark Ages in Europe were extremely limited . One illustration of this fact is the chronology of the highly esteemed English scholar Bede (The Venerable Bede , 672 /673 – 735) , which set the convention that the year 1 B.C.E. immediately precedes the year 1 A.D. ; this remains unchanged even though 0 is now generally accepted to be part of the number system . However , there were contributors to the subject during the period from the Latin commentator Boëthius (Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius , c. 475 – 524) shortly after the fall of the Western Roman Empire and continuing through to the end of the 12 th century ; Boëthius has been described as the last of the Romans and the first of the scholastic philosophers (predating the latter by many centuries) , and his mathematical texts of were still widely used 600 years after they were written . Several other names from this period are mentioned in Sections 5.4 and 6.1 of Burton , and the latter ’s exercises also mention Alcuin of York (735 – 804) and Gerbert d ’Aurillac (940 – 1003) , who later became Pope Sylvester I I (997 – 1003) . During the second half of the 11 th century some important political developments helped raise European ’s consciousness of ancient Greek mathematical work and the more recent advances by Indian and Arabic mathematicians. Many of these involved Christian conquests of territory that had been in Muslim hands for long periods of time . Specific examples of particular importance for mathematics were the Norman conquest of Sicily in 1072 , the Spanish reconquista during which extensive and important territories in the Iberian Peninsula changed from Muslim to Christian hands , and the start of the Crusades in 1095 .
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Meyrav, Yoav (Ed.)
    www.ssoar.info Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Meyrav, Yoav (Ed.) Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerk / collection Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Meyrav, Y. (Ed.). (2020). Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019. Berlin: De Gruyter. https:// doi.org/10.1515/9783110618839 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-68524-6 Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies Chief Editor Giuseppe Veltri Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies 2019 Volume Editor Yoav Meyrav The Yearbook is published on behalf of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies ISBN 978-3-11-060332-3 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-061883-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-060737-6 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 Licence. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: XXX Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Hard Time: Is God the Prisoner of the Oldest Dimension?
    Doing Hard Time: Is God the Prisoner of the Oldest Dimension? R.T. Mullins University of Notre Dame Abstract: In this paper I shall consider an objection to divine temporality called “The Prisoner of Time” objection. I shall begin by distinguishing divine timelessness from divine temporality in order to clear up common misunderstandings and caricatures of divine temporality. From there I shall examine the prisoner of time objection and explain why the prisoner of time objection fails to be a problem for the Christian divine temporalist. During the 20th Century, various Christian philosophers and theologians have rejected divine timelessness. This is not an entirely new phenomena; one can find philosophers and theologians from the Reformation on rejecting divine timelessness. Thinkers like Pierre Gassendi, Isaac Newton, Samuel Clarke, and John Tillotson all rejected the doctrine of divine timelessness long ago for philosophical, theological, scientific, and biblical reasons.1 For these thinkers, time is a necessary concomitant of God’s eternal nature. Despite the efforts of these thinkers, the doctrine of divine timelessness continued to play a central role in Christian theology until the 20th Century. During the 20th Century, and the beginning of this century, one can find a more wide spread rejection of divine timelessness amongst Christian philosophers and systematic theologians. Some of these rejections have been quite rigorous, while others have been misguided. The more recent widespread rejection of the atemporal God has led many into the loving arms of the temporal God. However, divine temporality is not without its critics. Divine atemporality refuses to lay down and die.
    [Show full text]
  • Pansacramentalism, Interreligious Theology, and Lived Religion
    religions Article Pansacramentalism, Interreligious Theology, and Lived Religion Hans Gustafson College of Arts and Sciences, University of St. Thomas, 2115 Summit Avenue, Mail 57P, St. Paul, MN 55105, USA; [email protected] Received: 21 May 2019; Accepted: 26 June 2019; Published: 28 June 2019 Abstract: Opening with a philosophical definition of sacrament(ality) as a mediator (mediation) of the sacred in the concrete world, this article offers pansacramentalism as a promising worldview—especially for those rooted in or emerging from the Christian traditions (since, for them, the language of sacramentality may have a stronger resonance)—for bringing together interreligious theology and data mined by Lived Religion approaches to the study of religion. After articulating the concept of pansacramentalism and emphasizing interreligious theology as an emerging model for doing theology, growing trends and changing sensibilities among young people’s religious and spiritual lives (e.g., the “Nones”) is considered insofar as such trends remain relevant for making contemporary theology accessible to the next generation. The article then considers the intersection of pansacramentalism and interreligious theology, especially the issue of determining sacramental authenticity. To explain how this challenge might be met, Abraham Heschel’s theology of theomorphism is offered as but one example as a nuanced means for determining sacramental authenticity of the sacred in the world. Turning to “Lived Religion” approaches, rationale is offered for why pansacramentalism and interreligious theology ought to be taken seriously in the contemporary world, especially considering recent data about the nature of contemporary religious identities among young people living in the West. Keywords: pansacramentalism; sacramentality; interreligious; lived religion; interreligious studies 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Death and Its Beyond in Early Judaism and Medieval Jewish Philosophy
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 3-1-2011 Death and Its Beyond in Early Judaism and Medieval Jewish Philosophy Adem Irmak University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Jewish Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Irmak, Adem, "Death and Its Beyond in Early Judaism and Medieval Jewish Philosophy" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 306. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/306 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. DEATH AND ITS BEYOND IN EARLY JUDAISM AND MEDIEVAL JEWISH PHILOSOPHY __________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Arts and Humanities University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts __________ by Adem Irmak March 2011 Advisor: Dr. Alison Schofield ©Copyright by Adem Irmak 2011 All Rights Reserved Author: Adem Irmak Title: DEATH AND ITS BEYOND IN EARLY JUDAISM AND MEDIEVAL JEWISH PHILOSOPHY Advisor: Dr. Alison Schofield Degree Date: March 2011 Abstract Afterlife and the concept of soul in Judaism is one of the main subjects that are discussed in the academia. There are some misassumptions related to hereafter and the fate of the soul after departing the body in Judaism. Since the Hebrew Bible does not talk about the death and afterlife clearly, some average people and some scholars claim that there is nothing relevant to the hereafter.
    [Show full text]