Tannenberg and the Masurian Lakes: Germany Superiority Established

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tannenberg and the Masurian Lakes: Germany Superiority Established •\ As'Schlieffen and his staff labored at the turn of the century to refine his^masiter conception for conquest in the West, as the elegantly attired officers and ladies of the Royal Hapsburg Court swirled to waltz music in Vienna, and as a premature revolution waxed and waned in Czarist Russia, almost nobody thought that Russian Poland, German Prussia, or Hungarian Gal 1- cia would become the major lod of action 1n any war among the great powers. Even on the eve of war in late July or upon its outbreak in August, no one foresaw a titanic struggle between the Elbe and the Pripet marshes west of Moscow--a struggle that would carom back and forth for three years as one side and then the other seemed to gain a temporary advantage, until the con test was finally decided by social, rather than military forces. (See Map 24a) German military prowess was the catalyst that toppled a socially deter iorating Russia which was creaking its way into the 20th century. Each of the powers had its own conception of how the war should proceed. In Berlin and Potsdam, in 1914, the General Staff looked anxiously westward where they expected the issue to be decided. Certainly the sluggish Russians would not mobilize, concentrate, and march towards Konigsberg and Deutch- Eylau before the Anglo-French armies could be enmeshed by the coils of five German armies advancing concurrently and in parallel into the French heart land. After that, admittedly it would probably be necessary to shift armies eastward to bait or deal with the Russian bear. Nor was the vision of land locked "advance and retreat" warfare envisioned in the councils of St. Peters burg, the forbidding and cold capital of Czarist Russia. There, the euphoria engendered by an alliance with France and an unwarranted perception of the staying power and strategy of the Hapsburg monarchy led to some optimistic predictions—that once the ominous "Russian steamroller" commenced to move no military force in central Europe could arrest it short of Berlin. Only then its momentum might expend itself by sheer friction, but certainly not before.1 Even the Germans had a healthy respect of the apparent inevitability of the forward progress of hordes of Muscovites, Cossacks, Mongols, and a dozen other ethnic groupings in the Czar's service. Austria-Hungary, although alarmed by the restive behe moth and the fountainhead of the opprobrious Pan-Slavism, proceeded to concentrate its main effort against hated Serbia. Here, Austria's inten tions were more punitive than prag matic. England and France, like Germany, ascertained that national life and death would be decided in the Marne marshes and the uplands of Champagne. Thus, the French appealed to St. Petersburg for a premature Russian offensive against East and West Prussia, commencing on 14 August in the hopes that the Germans would Cossacks in Transit to East Prussia g eastward, to be flattened by the steamroller or at least 86 restrained from western front operations. the steamroller, the mechanical condition of this touted imple- SB&SSsH=*S in its definitive breakdown.* Russian imperial enthusiasm to be a good ally, during the opening weeks, would ultimately weigh heavily upon national collapse three years later. Germanv Austria-Hungary and Russia, the three major powers which would become Soiled on the acknowledged secondary front, all had contingency olans for operations ranging from the vicinity of the Niemen River in Russia's ba?ren northlands to mountain fastnesses of the Carpathians, the natural ba™ to Budapest and Vienna. (See Map 24b) Much to Austrian dis- mav the GeTman General Staff became increasingly oriented to a risky, all- out" anniKive stroke in the West, particularly after 1890. This demanded, accordingly economy of force in the East and a defensive strategy there; such a strategy would be implemented by the relatively light Eighth Army (General Max von Prittwitz) plus fortress troops (concentrated primarily in East Prussia) which would delay any Russian thrust into the German homeland until sub iantiallories could be relieved from the Western Front and rail roaded into position opposite the Polish salient.3 Rebuffed in her efforts to convince Germany to concentrate more of the coalite's strengthen the East?Austria found it easy to become enthralled with the concept of a con clusive invasion of Serbia, her emotionally paramount objective, still, in the hope that the German northern effort would have some offensive.punch, the Austrian Colander, General Baron Conrad von Hotzendorf, positioned four armies along the southern edge of the Polish Salient and eastern Gaiicia for another simultaneous offensive against the Russians from Brest-Litovsk south eastward io the Dniester River (Austrian plan "R").* Russian strategy, as originally conceived with French assistance, was to place the bulk of We forces (four armies) in a Southwestern Army Group to oppose Austrian strength in Ga icia (Pirn "A"), absorbing whatever initial blows Franz Joseph's troops could deliver; but after mobilization was complete, it was planned to conduct an offensive into East Prussia with the Northwestern Army Group, consisting of the First (General Paul V. Rennenkampf) and Second (General Alexander V. Sam- sonov) Armies.5 In combined planning conferences with the French in pre-war years, the Russians had declared that no offensive could be undertaken until at least twenty days after mobilization. The French had insisted that the Russians mult be able to move with 900,000 men by the 14th day. In 1913, a compromise, fraught with risk to Russia, was reached whereby Russia agreed to move as soon after the 15th day as possible. When war came, however, because of the intense pressure on the French in the west, Joffre's officers implored Russia to move against East Prussia even earlier than the mobilization target date. When the Russian staff acquiesced, General Yakov G. Jilinsky's Northwest Army Group lurched uncertainly westward toward East Prussia on 13 August, less than two weeks following the mobilization order and a full week before a realistic pre-war estimate implied readiness would be achieved." Ironi cally, it was Jilinsky who suggested that his command make the premature 87 advance in response to French pressure. This was done fully appreciating that although the Russian infantry and cavalry units approximated full strength-- they outnumbered the Germans by almost 3 to 1-the supporting units were not yet in place.7 Further, the lines of communications, marginal at best, were nowhere near the state of efficiency required to support an offensive by a half million men. On the other hand, the German and Austrian support base was already largely mobilized and in place. On 17 August, General Rennenkampf's First Russian Army crossed the bor der into the German homeland.* Movement orders prescribed that the Second Army was to keep pace with Rennenkampf's advance toward Kb'nigsberg. (See Map 25) Samsonov was to cross the frontier in the vicinity of Soldau and swing northwest to help close the pincers on the German Eighth Army; then the two armies were expected to proceed deeper into the German homeland, hopefully to Berlin. The vagaries of geography, Russian command ineptness, and the German capacity to seize opportunity when presented, however, would combine to foil the Russian scheme and derail the steamroller. TANNENBERG AND THE MASURIAN LAKES: GERMANY SUPERIORITY ESTABLISHED The Polish salient, at the time an extremely inhospitable place even for the Russians,'was an intriguing land form, having changed hands among warring powers many times over the centuries, (See Map 24b) From the German point of view, it represented a sizable base area between East and West Prussia and between East Prussia and Galicia which inhibited the lateral movement of friendly forces. It was like a fist, thrust constantly into the German mid riff. To the Russians, it was at once an asset and a liability. It afforded a forward base area from which to attack Galicia or Prussia, but it was also a vulnerable appendage, enticing determined drives from the northwest and southeast (the vicinity of Thorn and Cracow) which could surgically separate the salient from Mother Russia and provide the Central Powers with a con tinuous north-south front line. In this event, the communications and indus trial centers of Warsaw, Lodz, and Ivangorad, would fall well within the German lines. The salient was underdeveloped because before their peremp tory decision to go on the offensive the Russians had willed it so, antici pating in future wars a German invasion which might be slowed or stalled because of poor roads, few railways, and a dearth of food and forage. The loyalties of the population were also questionable; it was never clear whether Russian forces operating in the salient were on friendly terrain or alien, whether they were present as liberators or as occupation forces. The Germans deceived themselves, also, as to the real depth of Polish affinity for Teu tonic hegemony. It is entirely likely that the Poles endeavored to stay out of the reach of either army and cursed the houses of Romanov and Hohen- zollern.8 North of the salient and forming its northern base, ran the German-Rus sian/Polish frontier between the Niemen and Narew Rivers. A few kilometers *Rennenkampf's name is phonetically teutonic. His ancestors were German and during the war, prior to his relief for ineptness, rumors abounded that he was passing military information to the enemy. 88 wp*t of the frontier lay the chain of the Masurian Lakes (See Map 25), a series of fresh water obstacles running south from Angerburg to Johannesburg. The *akes, patroUed by German craft and guarded by the central fortress of Lotzen, prohibited the movement of large bodies of troops from east to west and channelized advancing armies into two streams-through the 40-nnle wide lns?erburg gap norihV the lakes and through Russian Poland to the south.
Recommended publications
  • GENERAL Ilkx HOFFMANN T a N N E N B E R G IT R'eally WAS" with Two Original Maps Translated by Captain, Intan
    GENERAL ILkX HOFFMANN TANNENBERG---------- "AS IT R'EALLY WAS" with Two Original Maps Translated by Captain, Intantry Published by Kultwpolit ik Berlin 1926 TRANSLATOR'S NOTE -------w-- w ---- Wilnaver &my and Warsaw Army in the text have been translated FIRST ARMY and SECOND ARMY respect- ively. Numbers inparenthesis, e. g. (1)indicate that the preceding translation pertains to page 1 of orlginal text. TABLE -OF CONTENTS Page Chapter The Prelude at Gumbinnen. 4 The Recall of Prittwitz . 9 The New Army Headquarters . , 18 The Concentration for Battle. 21 The First Engagement. , . 24 VII Erroneous Estimate of the Situation by Samsonow . 33 Differences between General Von Francois and the Army Headquarters . 36 Successful Attack of the Right Wing of the XX Army Corps and the meeting en- gagementatLautern.. 40 The Decisive Events of the Battle - The break-throughatUsdau. 49 Friction in the XX Corps. , . 58 Attack on the Russian Center. 62 Independent Decision of General von Morgen, . 66 XIV The Events on Both Wings. 73 The Inactivity of Rennenkampf . 78 XVI The Corps from the Western Front. 80 XVII RussianAttempts at Relief. , 89 Conclusions . , . 95 First 1000 Copyright 1926 by Kutturpolitik - Berlin Printed by Julius Klinkhardt - Leipzig CHAPTER I THE PREL.WE AT GUNBINNEN GENERAL VON PRITTIIVITZ and GAFFRON, Cormander of the German Eighth &my, who at the beginning of the war had been assigned the mission of defending the eastern. front of the empire against the Russians, was faced with an un- usually difficult task. The manner in which it could be accomplished had been taught us by GRAF SCHLIEFFEN, Chief of our great General Staff, In innumerable war games and problems.
    [Show full text]
  • V^Ciocc1, Primarily O.. J Trrnalation Of) 1 R;Jt.^Rb^I>G-- Viic Cc
    hi.. ":Ui('-(t> >it! •/..'/><* ttirhyft-.rti.r. ,V./iV /../.. '.i,iuith-ir»rh ti>i it iktfu a././ <r V^ciocc1, primarily o.. J trrnalation of) 1 r;jT.^rB^i>G-- viic cc '.-virkllch v;ar,by / imade bj auf.h:r uf hhie article. ; .• . ... _ , , . , , . , , , , , t . , '.,;",•;,••'• •; ' . •' •<. ' '.' ' 7 " ! r " '• " ' ' "';/ ...... ,, ./ i ii ,V I it i l! II >t •< . •ili'iii I i ii I, „ „ .. II . •-. >.i) II ;. .. .i >t it H it li it ,f)i u ,i Hi, il-ul CODE; tflWBER , IR—1933 I N D IV ID U A ij *RES EAR OH STUDY A CRITICAL AKALY8I& OP TtiE BATTLE OP TANNENBERO •••i; " . • : , (baaed primarily on a translation of nTANNENEERQ--wie es wirklieh war11 General Max Hoffmann) Submitted by \ THIS SOLUTICM MtiST BS RiSTURf^ED FOR FILE BY 5:00 >!W,, OUTHE DATS SKOSN •PLEABB PLACE Y'jUR NAME ON COVZR PACE HiE WRNI1W. FOR FU.E LBUT DO NOV PLACE VGUK 1 0» SOLUTION IWEif WRESTING A RDVIEff. The Command and General Staff School .'.}••• Leavenworth'' , •Kansa ' s Fort Leftv>nworth, Kansas, May IB; 1933 MEMORANDUM FOR: The Director Second Year Class, The Com­ mand and Oeneral Staff School, Fort Leavehworth, Kansas. A:Crjitioal Anaiysis :o£ the Battle of Tan­ enberg (based primarily oh•aftranslation of "Tannenberg wie es wirklioh war" by Max Hoffmann) I, PAPERS ACCOMPANYING: 1. A Bibliography for this study. 2. Maps: (1) Strategic Map--East Prussia, Campaign SO $d^&hj6e;J^^ 'Armiejst &) J'JBi^^le'j^of'^^ia%7'-F^a)^enjaii 4) !'$ei^u<iti ioh^'/bif;;.inu81lB'ian r igfifc 'tlank 5) Attack on Russian left, August 26-28, • ' 101^ ' •' ', i JL v J L * ^ ' ', :; • '• J > (6) Attaok on Russian Center, August 26-28, 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornelius Ryan Collection of World War II Papers, Mahn Center for Archives and Special Collections, Ohio University
    Cornelius Ryan Collection of World War II Papers, Mahn Center for Archives and Special Collections, Ohio University The Last Battle Inventory List First published by Simon & Schuster in 1966. The Last Battle has been translated into Arabic, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Icelandic, Italian, Japanese, Latvian, Norwegian, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Serbo-Croatian, Slovenian, Spanish, and Swedish. Table of Contents Cornelius Ryan Collection of World War II Papers, Mahn Center for Archives and Special Collections, Ohio University ..... 1 Initial Research ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Allied Political and Military Leadership ............................................................................................................................... 6 American Forces .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 French Forced Labor ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 German Civilians ............................................................................................................................................................... 30 German Forces ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Great War: Insights and Perspectives
    Geschichte - Erinnerung - Politik 13 13 Geschichte - Erinnerung - Politik 13 Elz˙bieta Katarzyna Dzikowska / Elz˙bieta Katarzyna Dzikowska / Agata Handley / Piotr Zawilski (eds.) Agata Handley / Piotr Zawilski (eds.) Piotr Zawilski (eds.) (eds.) Piotr Zawilski The Great War / This publication is a collection of articles The Editors The Great War which summarise results of investigations Elz˙bieta Katarzyna Dzikowska works at into archival materials concerning war- the University of Łódz´, the Department of time stories of various nations involved in Literature and Culture of Germany, Aus- Insights and Perspectives the Great War. The objective of the authors tria and Switzerland. The main areas of was to analyse the wartime experience of her academic research include German Agata Handley individuals and local communities as well 20th century literature, Polish-German / as whole nations. They further tried to comparative literature and gender issues. present a closer, more personal overview Agata Handley works as a lecturer and a of wartime drama. As a result the book researcher at the University of Łódz´, the portrays the impact of the Great War on Department of Literature and Culture of the lives of multicultural communities, Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The re-constructs individual war narratives main areas of her academic interest are and studies consequences of the conflict. literature translation, British culture and The use of various types of historical contemporary British poetry. materials from state archives and from Piotr Zawilski is the director of the State other sources enabled the authors to create Archive in Łódz´. He is the Vice-President a multifaceted portrayal of the war seen of the Association of Polish Archivists and from local and international perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY RE3RARCH STUDIES for TH8 DRAMATIZATION of the "BATTLS OP TANNENBSRG*. CALTER L. 7SIBT-B, F C Aptain
    PRELIMINARY RE3RARCH STUDIES FOR TH8 DRAMATIZATION OF THE "BATTLS OP TANNENBSRG*. CALTER L. 7SIBT-B, f Captain, C» A> C. PRELIMINARY RESEARCH STUDIES FOR THE DRAMATIZATION OP THE "BATTLE OF UNMENBEHO." WALTER L. WEIBLE, Captain, C.A.C. NOTE: This individual research was made for the assistance of the remainder of the group of officers engaged in this Group Research. STRENGTH, ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL OF THE OPPOSING FORCES IN EAST PRUSSIA DURING THE PERIOD AUGUST 20th - 31st, 1914. (With special reference to those forces employed in the "Battle of Tannenberg.") - Page 1. ­ PART I - OERMAN. 1. General Organisation. a. Infantry Division. 4 regiments of Infantry (5 battalions eaoh)..12 bns. (13,000 man) 24 machine guns. Artillery: 64 light field guns IB light field howltiers 72 pieces. In addition the Corps usually attached 8 of their heavy howitzer* to eaoh of Its two Infantry divlclone. b. Reserve Infantry Division. the oonposltlon snd organisation of this unit was lden­ tloal with that given above except that there were only 36 light field guns Instout of 54. This type unit had no Corps Artillery which could be attached to It except that heavy artillery which might be attached from the fortresses. o. Landwehr Brigade. 2 Infantry regiments of 5 battalions each....6 bns. (6,000 men). Maohlne guns none. Artillery: 12 light field guns .12 pieoes. d< Cavalry Division. 6 cavalry regiments of 4 squadrons each 24 squadrons (4,000 men) Machine guns .........6 Artillery: 12 light field guns 12 pieces. e. The Oernan Reserve units were expanded from secrot cadres upon the declaration of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization of German Field Armies, 17 August 1914
    Organization of German Field Armies 17 August 1914 Army Reserves: 2nd General of Foot Artillery 2nd Foot Artillery Brigade Command 3rd Foot Artillery Brigade Command 4th Foot Artillery Brigade Command 5th Foot Artillery Brigade Command 7th Foot Artillery Brigade Command Reserve Foot Artillery 2/9th Reserve Foot Artillery Regiment 3rd Heavy Coast Mortar Battery (305mm) 4th Heavy Coast Mortar Battery (305mm) Short Coast Gun Battery (420mm) Other Experimental Pioneer Company Heavy Mortars 7 Zeppelins 3 Telegraph Battalions Survey Battalion 11 Hospital Platoons 7 Support Hospital Platoons 1st Senior Cavalry Command (supporting 3rd Army) Guard Cavalry Division:1 1st Guard Cavalry Brigade: 1/,2/,3/,4/Gardes du Corps Regiment 1/,2/,3/,4/Guard Cuirassier Regiment 2nd Guard Cavalry Brigade: 1/,2/,3/,4/1st Guard Uhlan Regiment 1/,2/,3/,4/3rd Guard Uhlan Regiment 3rd Guard Cavalry Brigade: 1/,2/,3/,4/1st Guard Dragoon Regiment 1/,2/,3/,4/2nd Guard Dragoon Regiment Artillery Horse Battalion, 1st Guard Field Artillery Regiment (3 Btrys,4-77mm guns ea) Other: 1st Guard Machine Gun Battalion Signals Battalion Pioneer Battalion 2nd Heavy Radio Station 1st & 2nd Light Radio Station 10th Cavalry Column 5th Cavalry Division: 1 Cron indicates that the Guard and 5th Cavarly Divisions had the 11th, 12th, and 13th Jäger Battalions divided between them on 17 August 1914, but provides no indication as to their assignment. Those shown are as indicated in Histories of Two Hundred and Fifty-One Divisions. 1 9th Cavalry Brigade: 1/,2/,3/,4/4th Dragoon Regiment 1/,2/,3/,4/10th
    [Show full text]
  • American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe
    United States Cryptologic History American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa Series IV World War II Volume 1 American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe i46074 This publication is a product of the National Security Agency history program. It presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other U.S. government entity. UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY Sources in Cryptologic History Series IV Volume 1 American Signal Intelligence in Northwest Africa and Western Europe George F. Howe National Security Agency 2010 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Page Foreword . ix Author’s Note . x Introduction . .1 PART ONE: THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Chapter 1: Situation Report . .7 Early Conditions . 7 Early British Experiences with Field SIGINT . 10 German Army and Air Force SIGINT Organizations . 11 U.S. Preparations for SIGINT Service in the West . 13 The Call of the Mediterranean . .16 Chapter 2: Beginnings in Northwest Africa . 19 Planning SIGINT Service in Operation TORCH . 19 Operation TORCH . 23 Tunisia: Organization for the Second Phase . 28 Action during January 1943 . 30 Chapter 3: Axis Initiative in February 1943 . 35 Axis Plans — Allied Expectations . 35 Allied Reversals, 14-17 February 1943 . 36 Through Kasserine Pass . 38 Recapitulation . 39 Two Opposing Army Groups . 40 Chapter 4: The March Offensives . 45 Expectations . 45 II Corps Attacks: Gafsa, Maknassy, and El Guettar . 46 The Enemy Retreat to the Bridgehead . 48 Chapter 5: The Final Phase of Tunisia . .51 Summary . .51 The Attack Begins . 51 The End in Tunisia .
    [Show full text]
  • The War in the Ether: Tannenberg: Finale And
    ASA REVIEW - September 1952,, aEl"-9ID:.. A592 l.8 The War 1n the Ether: TANNENBERG: FINALE AND DISCUSSION (8onfidautlal) The battle of Tannenberg was the first in the history of man in which the interception of enemy radio traffic played a decisive role, although the intercept service of the victorious Germana was poorly coordinated and some of the vital radiograms, sent jn plain text, were intercepted by chance. A previous article in the June 1952 issue covered this battle aga1nat the Russians to the point where the Germana were ready for the kill. Gen­ eral Hindenburg had learned from intercept that the left wing of his for­ ces consisting of the lat Reserve Corps and the XVII Corps was still unop­ posed by the First Russian Army of ,General Rennenkampf because the Rus­ sians had not yet come up into line and was able to use these forces with his right wing, consisting chiefly of XX Corps, which was op-posed by the Russian Second Army under General Samsonov, consisting of XX:III Corps and other units. The forces which General Hindenburg took from his left and used wjth XX Corps were the lat Reserve Corps and XVII Corps. Badia deception was used to give the impression the left wing was still in strength, as will be noted in the following article. The Russian XVII Corps and XV Corps mentioned below had come to the support of the Russian Second Army. The Russian II Corps was additional reenforcement which had not yet arrived. On 28 August at 0700 hours Hindenburg regardless of everything,and on the short­ and his Staff arrived in Froegenau to di­ est possible route, to the Stabigotten­ rect the battle from there.
    [Show full text]
  • XIX Tactical Air Command and ULTRA Patton’S Force Enhancers in the 1944 Campaign in France
    COLLEGE OF AEROSPACE DOCTRINE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION AIR UNIVERSITY XIX Tactical Air Command and ULTRA Patton’s Force Enhancers in the 1944 Campaign in France BRADFORD J. “BJ” SHWEDO Major, USAF CADRE Paper No. 10 Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6615 May 2001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Shwedo, Bradford J., 1963– XIX Tactical Air Command and ULTRA : Patton’s force enhancers in the 1944 campaign in France / Bradford J. Shwedo. p. cm. –– (CADRE paper ; 10) At head of title: College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education, Air University. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-58566-089-2 1. World War, 1939–1945––Campaigns––France. 2. Patton, George S. (George Smith), 1885–1945. 3. ULTRA (Intelligence system) 4. World War, 1939–1945–– Military intelligence––United States. 5. World War, 1939–1945–– Cryptography. 6. United States. Army Air Forces. Tactical Air Command, 19th–– History. 7. World War, 1939–1945––Regimental histories––United States. 8. Close air support. I. Title: 19 Tactical Air Command and Ultra. II. Title: Nineteen Tactical Air Command and Ultra. III. Title. IV. Series. D761 .S49 2001 940.54'214––dc21 2001022416 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. This CADRE Paper and others in the series are available electronically at the Air University Research Web site http://research.maxwell.af.mil under “Research Papers” then “Special Collections.” ii CADRE Papers CADRE Papers are occasional publications sponsored by the Airpower Research Institute of Air University’s College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education (CADRE).
    [Show full text]
  • Partial History of the Xx Corps United States Third Army
    PARTIAL HISTORY OF THE XX CORPS UNITED STATES THIRD ARMY 23 August 1944 1 January 1945 RACE ACROSS FRANCE In the early morning of the 23rd of August with a Command Post located in a concealed garden in the Chateau de Courances in Milly, the XX Corps began the attack which was to breach the Seine River line in both the north and south sectors of the Corps zone. In the southern sector, Corps infantry troops drove 13 miles east from Milly through the Forest of Fontainebleau itself. On reaching the banks of the Seine, the advance guard found the River bridge blown but either swam the river or rowed across in abandoned boats. The enemy counter-attacked viciously with tanks but the small American group, aided by the close fire support of Corps artillery, clung to the small bridgehead. Also in the South, at Montereau, which lies in a natural bowl, 5th Division forces seized the high ground surrounding the city in the dark hours of early morning. At daylight two battalions rushed to the Seine River. They swam and waded across the river at a ford, which had been located by reconnaissance patrols, to rout the surprised enemy holding the high ground northeast of the city. Meanwhile, in the northern portion of the XX Corps zone, a surprise attempt by the armor to enter Melun without artillery preparation was foiled by an alert enemy. Heavy shelling and intense small arms fire by Nazi troops at the crossing site threatened to stop the advance of the 7th Armored Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Trenches – the Social and Cultural Impact of the Great War Geschichte - Erinnerung - Politik Studies in History, Memory and Politics
    Geschichte - Erinnerung - Politik 19 19 Geschichte - Erinnerung - Politik 19 Elz˙bieta Katarzyna Dzikowska / Agata G. Handley / Elz˙bieta Katarzyna Dzikowska / / Piotr Zawilski (eds.) Agata G. Handley / Beyond the Trenches – Piotr Zawilski (eds.) The Social and Cultural Impact Piotr Zawilski (eds.) Piotr Zawilski of the Great War / This collection of articles is the outcome The Editors Beyond the Trenches – of extensive investigations into archival Elz˙bieta Katarzyna Dzikowska is Profes- materials, concerning the involvement sor at the Institute of German Philology, of various nations in the Great War. The University of Łódz´. The main areas of her Katarzyna Dzikowska Katarzyna The Social authors analyse the wartime experiences academic research include: German 20th of individuals and local communities, century literature, Polish-German com- as well as whole nations. They offer a parative literature and gender issues. and Cultural Impact closer, more personal view of the impact Agata G. Handley received her PhD at the Elz˙bieta Agata G. Handley of the Great War. The book re-constructs University of Łódz´, where she works as a individual war narratives, and studies the researcher at the Philology Department. of the Great War long-term consequences of the conflict. The main areas of her academic interest The result is a multifaceted portrayal of are: British culture and contemporary the war, seen from local and international British poetry. perspectives. Piotr Zawilski is director of the State Archive in Łódz´ and former director of the State Archive in Piotrków Trybunalski. He is the Vice-President of the Associa- tion of Polish Archivists. Cultural the War of Great Impact Beyond the Trenches – The Social and the Trenches Beyond ISBN 978-3-631-71638-0 Geschichte - Erinnerung - Politik 19 19 Geschichte - Erinnerung - Politik 19 Elz˙bieta Katarzyna Dzikowska / Agata G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginnings of Radio Intercept in World War I
    UNCLASSIFIED Wilhelm Flicke The Beginnings of Radio Intercept in World War I A brief history by a German intelligence officer The endeavor to learn what is in the opponent's mind Prior to World War I Austria had several occasions to and to draw advantage from it has always been very test out this new means of gaining information. important in the history of mankind in peacetime and During the crises which arose in 1908 between Austria particularly in wartime. During thousands of years only and Italy in connection with the annexation by Austria of In the methods have changed. the days when there was Bosnia and Herzegovina, all Italian radio traffic on the no technical medium for conveying thought over great continent and at sea was intercepted by the Austrians. At distances, the only existing possibility was either to that time Austria began regular cryptanalytic work, and overhear the spoken word or to intercept-or at least in this way was able to get valuable insight into Italy's have a look at-messages transmitted in writing. To attitude; this proved of great value for Austrian foreign ! guard against this latter possibility, secret writing was policy. invented. The history of the last three thousand years is full of examples of great successes in statesmanship or in In 1911, when war broke out between Italy and military enterprises which were due solely to the fact that Turkey over Tripolitania and Cyrenaica, the Austrian the statesman or general concerned was able to organize intercept service had an opportunity for the first time to cleverJy and to maintain for a considerable period of time prove its worth in the military as well as in the political a method of spying on the transmitted thoughts of his field.
    [Show full text]