DOCSLIB.ORG

East -0- Vvest `C5- Height of Ridge Above Final Finish Grade: North South ,+'-0„ ±€" E.As+ IY' ± €" Wesit Additional F]Emarks BEVISIONS* 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East -0- Vvest `C5- Height of Ridge Above Final Finish Grade: North South ,+'-0„ ±€ CEBTIFICATE NO: DATE ISSUED: Application to the HISTOBIC DISTPICT COMMISSION, Nantucket, Massachusetts, for a CERTIFICATE OF APPF]OPRIATENESS for structural work. All blanks must be filled in using BLUE OP BLACK INK (no pencil) or marked N/A. NOTE: lt is strongly recommended that the applicant be familiar with the HDC guidelines, Bui./di'ng MriTh rvanfockef /.n A4/.nd, prior to submittal of application. Please see other side for submittal requirements. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed by the HDC. This is a contractual agreement and must be filled out in ink. An application is hereby made for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness under Chapter 395 of the Acts and Besolves of Mass.,1970, for proposed work as described herein and on plans, drawings and photographs accompanying this application and made a part hereof by reference. The certificate is valid for three years from date of issuance. No structure may differ from the approved application. Violation may impede issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. PPOPERTY DESCRIPTION TAX MAP N°: q/ pApCEL N°. 4+ 8 Street& Numberof proposedwork: 11 MEA00if`/ ELAiv£~ ownerof record: D£B ReALTr Teu5f Mailing Address: 32. PARVC AVE NE!wTON M o2.L[58 coutac\phone#.. €/7 5q6 (Ice E-mat" AGENT INFORMATION (if applicable) Name: BFtrar`i r4_crroR.ao" ot=iG/vts iN® Mailing Address: ap sOuTIJ MtuL s{aEEr NtiN PucKtl /!A___ c_I_P3S+ Contact phone#: 22 #f6 E-mail : DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFOF}MED H New RE" EAddition I Garage I Dr,ve;:ye/;::::Se for r=q:I:emdmd:rcc:aTentat'°= H,stor,ca, penovat,on HDeck/Patio Esteps Eshed HColorchange EFence EGate EHardscaping EMove Building EDemolition I Pevisions to previous Cert. No. EPool (Zoning District_) EPoof\=|'_8F#°thsear plo_9__I tiqus© Size of structure orAddition: Length: Sq. Footage lstfloor: 37j Decks/Patio: Size: 2&'QFff8'-qu" Hlstfloor E2nd floor width: 1,+ Sq. footage 2nd floor: fin,O Size: Elstfloor E2ndfloor Sq. footage 3rd floor: Difference between existing grade and proposed fin -a- East -0- vvest `C5- Height of ridge above final finish grade: North south ,+'-0„ ±€" E.as+ IY' ± €" Wesit Additional F]emarks BEVISIONS* 1. East Elevation Historic Name: 2. South Elevation Original Date: (describe) 3. West Elevation Original Builder: 4. North Elevation Is there an HDC survey form for this building attached? I Yes j*:N/A *Cloud on drawings and submit photographs of existing elevations. L/[DETAIL iA[L OFur WORKwurir` TOI u lJE: BE PEF}FORMED Foundation: HeightExposed l4-2`r EBlock EBlockparged EBrick(type) 93] Poured concrete I piers Masonry chimney: I BIock parged I Brick (type) I Other F}oof pitch: MainMass + /12 Secondary Mass Dormer /12 Other Roofing material: EAsphalt: E3-Tab EArchitectural EEWood (Type: Bed Cedar, hite Cedar, Shakes, etc.) T® rmTCH Ifou3€ Skylights (flat only): Manufacturer F]ough Opening Manufacturer Bough Opening Gutters: EEWood EAluminum I Copper I Leaders (material) |cH Ffoo>€ Leaders (material and size): T® fu^<.rl rloub€ Sidewall: I White cedar shingles tBclapboard(exposure: 9'' VE¢7 inches) FrontE I Other ALL sloes Trim: A.Wood Epine Epedwood tEcedar Eother B. Treatment EBpaint I Natural to weather I other C. Dimensions: Fascia " - Fake " ~ Soffit (Overhang) Corner boards - Window Casing TMlr. Door Frame T71gf Columns/Posts: Bound Square Windows*: EDoubleHung Hcasement EAllwood Eother T€39____L±T€H(rouse I True Divided Lights(muntins), single pane HSDL's (Simulated Divided Lights) Manufacturer A~DEksp~ Doors* (type and material): ETDL EESDL Front Bear Side Garage Door(s): Type Material Hardscape materials: Driveways Walkways * Note: Complete door and window schedules are required. COLORS Sidewall Vth` Tl(AI CGOA& try6i4fG Clapboard (if applicable) F3oof N A{ URAL_ Trim sash wni7G To A44FT:a/+ rfo'oS DOors wttn€ rflo r\^izc`H ttoustr Deck Fou nd ation ~4fu Fence Shutters * Attach manufacturer's color samples if color is not from HDC approval list. I hereby authorize the agent named above to act on my behalf to make changes in the specifications or the plans contained in this application in order to bring the applica- tion into compliance with the HDC guidelines. I hereby agree to abide by and comply with the terms and conditions of this application. I hereby agree that the submission of any revisions to this_ applicati_orLwill-a-Zj®-'`' `' initiate ''-'_--_ a new' '---i.:-:-:-+-=J^':+-i:i:::+-,-:^^,A sixty-day review period. a- Signature of owner of record HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 2 Fairgrounds Road Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 Telephone: 508.325.7587 COMMISSIONERS Ray Pohl Chairman Waiver of the HDC 10 Day Hearing Requirement Diane Coombs Vice-Chairman Val Oliver I ___________________________________________________________________Ethan McMorrow Abigail Camp AS AGENT FOR ______________________________________________________D&B Realt Trust John McLaughlin STREET ADDRESS ___________________________________________________11 Meadow Lane ASSOCIATE MAP/PARCEL ____________________________________41 448 ___________________ COMMISSIONERS UNDERSTAND THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCED APPLICATION SUBMITTED ON Stephen Welch TJ Watterson ______________________________________________11/29/2020 _______________________ Jesse Dutra WILL NOT BE REVIEWED BY THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, DUE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, WITHIN THE 10 DAY PERIOD AS REQUIRED BY: STAFF SECTION 8 of the HDC enabling legislation: … The Commission shall meet Cathy Flynn within ten (10) days of the receipt of an application for a certificate of Land Use Specialist [email protected] appropriateness or permit for removal… AND I AGREE TO A WAIVER OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED REQUIREMENT. ____________________________________________________________________ Ethan McMorrow 11/29/2020 Signature Date .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unicode Request for Cyrillic Modifier Letters Superscript Modifiers
    Unicode request for Cyrillic modifier letters L2/21-107 Kirk Miller, [email protected] 2021 June 07 This is a request for spacing superscript and subscript Cyrillic characters. It has been favorably reviewed by Sebastian Kempgen (University of Bamberg) and others at the Commission for Computer Supported Processing of Medieval Slavonic Manuscripts and Early Printed Books. Cyrillic-based phonetic transcription uses superscript modifier letters in a manner analogous to the IPA. This convention is widespread, found in both academic publication and standard dictionaries. Transcription of pronunciations into Cyrillic is the norm for monolingual dictionaries, and Cyrillic rather than IPA is often found in linguistic descriptions as well, as seen in the illustrations below for Slavic dialectology, Yugur (Yellow Uyghur) and Evenki. The Great Russian Encyclopedia states that Cyrillic notation is more common in Russian studies than is IPA (‘Transkripcija’, Bol’šaja rossijskaja ènciplopedija, Russian Ministry of Culture, 2005–2019). Unicode currently encodes only three modifier Cyrillic letters: U+A69C ⟨ꚜ⟩ and U+A69D ⟨ꚝ⟩, intended for descriptions of Baltic languages in Latin script but ubiquitous for Slavic languages in Cyrillic script, and U+1D78 ⟨ᵸ⟩, used for nasalized vowels, for example in descriptions of Chechen. The requested spacing modifier letters cannot be substituted by the encoded combining diacritics because (a) some authors contrast them, and (b) they themselves need to be able to take combining diacritics, including diacritics that go under the modifier letter, as in ⟨ᶟ̭̈⟩BA . (See next section and e.g. Figure 18. ) In addition, some linguists make a distinction between spacing superscript letters, used for phonetic detail as in the IPA tradition, and spacing subscript letters, used to denote phonological concepts such as archiphonemes.
    [Show full text]
  • +1. Introduction 2. Cyrillic Letter Rumanian Yn
    MAIN.HTM 10/13/2006 06:42 PM +1. INTRODUCTION These are comments to "Additional Cyrillic Characters In Unicode: A Preliminary Proposal". I'm examining each section of that document, as well as adding some extra notes (marked "+" in titles). Below I use standard Russian Cyrillic characters; please be sure that you have appropriate fonts installed. If everything is OK, the following two lines must look similarly (encoding CP-1251): (sample Cyrillic letters) АабВЕеЗКкМНОопРрСсТуХхЧЬ (Latin letters and digits) Aa6BEe3KkMHOonPpCcTyXx4b 2. CYRILLIC LETTER RUMANIAN YN In the late Cyrillic semi-uncial Rumanian/Moldavian editions, the shape of YN was very similar to inverted PSI, see the following sample from the Ноул Тестамент (New Testament) of 1818, Neamt/Нямец, folio 542 v.: file:///Users/everson/Documents/Eudora%20Folder/Attachments%20Folder/Addons/MAIN.HTM Page 1 of 28 MAIN.HTM 10/13/2006 06:42 PM Here you can see YN and PSI in both upper- and lowercase forms. Note that the upper part of YN is not a sharp arrowhead, but something horizontally cut even with kind of serif (in the uppercase form). Thus, the shape of the letter in modern-style fonts (like Times or Arial) may look somewhat similar to Cyrillic "Л"/"л" with the central vertical stem looking like in lowercase "ф" drawn from the middle of upper horizontal line downwards, with regular serif at the bottom (horizontal, not slanted): Compare also with the proposed shape of PSI (Section 36). 3. CYRILLIC LETTER IOTIFIED A file:///Users/everson/Documents/Eudora%20Folder/Attachments%20Folder/Addons/MAIN.HTM Page 2 of 28 MAIN.HTM 10/13/2006 06:42 PM I support the idea that "IA" must be separated from "Я".
    [Show full text]
  • Old Cyrillic in Unicode*
    Old Cyrillic in Unicode* Ivan A Derzhanski Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences [email protected] The current version of the Unicode Standard acknowledges the existence of a pre- modern version of the Cyrillic script, but its support thereof is limited to assigning code points to several obsolete letters. Meanwhile mediæval Cyrillic manuscripts and some early printed books feature a plethora of letter shapes, ligatures, diacritic and punctuation marks that want proper representation. (In addition, contemporary editions of mediæval texts employ a variety of annotation signs.) As generally with scripts that predate printing, an obvious problem is the abundance of functional, chronological, regional and decorative variant shapes, the precise details of whose distribution are often unknown. The present contents of the block will need to be interpreted with Old Cyrillic in mind, and decisions to be made as to which remaining characters should be implemented via Unicode’s mechanism of variation selection, as ligatures in the typeface, or as code points in the Private space or the standard Cyrillic block. I discuss the initial stage of this work. The Unicode Standard (Unicode 4.0.1) makes a controversial statement: The historical form of the Cyrillic alphabet is treated as a font style variation of modern Cyrillic because the historical forms are relatively close to the modern appearance, and because some of them are still in modern use in languages other than Russian (for example, U+0406 “I” CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER I is used in modern Ukrainian and Byelorussian). Some of the letters in this range were used in modern typefaces in Russian and Bulgarian.
    [Show full text]
  • Lje-L(Sx+Ty\(S,T)Dsdt
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICALSOCIETY Volume 112, Number 3, July 1991 PRINCIPAL DISTRIBUTIONS FOR ALMOST UNPERTURBED SCHRÖDINGER PAIRS OF OPERATORS DAOXING XIA (Communicated by Paul S. Muhly) Abstract. The relation between the principal distribution for an almost un- perturbed Schrödinger pair operators {U, V} and the unitary operator W satisfying V = W~ UW is found. 1. Introduction This paper is a continuation of the previous work [7]. Let %* be a Hubert space, {U, V} be a pair of selfadjoint operators on %* and a e R. This pair is said to be an almost unperturbed Schrödinger pair of operators [7] with parameter a ^ 0, if there is a trace class operator D such that i[U, V]Ç = aÇ + DC, £ e M, where M c 2(U) Ç\2(V) is a linear manifold dense in ¿F satisfying UM c 2¡(V), VM c 3S(U), and M = (U - zI)~{2(V) or M = (V -ziyx2)(U) for some zeC\R. For this pair {U, V}, a cyclic one cocycle is given by the trace formula tr([e. ,r is.' U e it.V' , e is,U- e it,V,- ] - e i{s,+s.,)U ' - e i(t,+t,)V, ' 2 (e -ias,t, - ' - e -ias.t,,, '2)) = r(sx+s2,tx+t2)(e -l-e 12), where [•, •] is the commutator, and the function t may be written as (2) x(s, t) = tr (e'sU f e'rV Del[t~r)Vdx) I ta. The principal distribution for this pair {U, V} is defined as (3) G(x,y) = ^lje-l(sx+ty\(s,t)dsdt.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Specific Peculiarities Document for Halh Mongolian As Spoken in MONGOLIA
    Language Specific Peculiarities Document for Halh Mongolian as Spoken in MONGOLIA Halh Mongolian, also known as Khalkha (or Xalxa) Mongolian, is a Mongolic language spoken in Mongolia. It has approximately 3 million speakers. 1. Special handling of dialects There are several Mongolic languages or dialects which are mutually intelligible. These include Chakhar and Ordos Mongol, both spoken in the Inner Mongolia region of China. Their status as separate languages is a matter of dispute (Rybatzki 2003). Halh Mongolian is the only Mongolian dialect spoken by the ethnic Mongolian majority in Mongolia. Mongolian speakers from outside Mongolia were not included in this data collection; only Halh Mongolian was collected. 2. Deviation from native-speaker principle No deviation, only native speakers of Halh Mongolian in Mongolia were collected. 3. Special handling of spelling None. 4. Description of character set used for orthographic transcription Mongolian has historically been written in a large variety of scripts. A Latin alphabet was introduced in 1941, but is no longer current (Grenoble, 2003). Today, the classic Mongolian script is still used in Inner Mongolia, but the official standard spelling of Halh Mongolian uses Mongolian Cyrillic. This is also the script used for all educational purposes in Mongolia, and therefore the script which was used for this project. It consists of the standard Cyrillic range (Ux0410-Ux044F, Ux0401, and Ux0451) plus two extra characters, Ux04E8/Ux04E9 and Ux04AE/Ux04AF (see also the table in Section 5.1). 5. Description of Romanization scheme The table in Section 5.1 shows Appen's Mongolian Romanization scheme, which is fully reversible.
    [Show full text]
  • TLD: Сайт Script Identifier: Cyrillic Script Description: Cyrillic Unicode (Basic, Extended-A and Extended-B) Version: 1.0 Effective Date: 02 April 2012
    TLD: сайт Script Identifier: Cyrillic Script Description: Cyrillic Unicode (Basic, Extended-A and Extended-B) Version: 1.0 Effective Date: 02 April 2012 Registry: сайт Registry Contact: Iliya Bazlyankov <[email protected]> Tel: +359 8 9999 1690 Website: http://www.corenic.org This document presents a character table used by сайт Registry for IDN registrations in Cyrillic script. The policy disallows IDN variants, but prevents registration of names with potentially similar characters to avoid any user confusion. U+002D;U+002D # HYPHEN-MINUS -;- U+0030;U+0030 # DIGIT ZERO 0;0 U+0031;U+0031 # DIGIT ONE 1;1 U+0032;U+0032 # DIGIT TWO 2;2 U+0033;U+0033 # DIGIT THREE 3;3 U+0034;U+0034 # DIGIT FOUR 4;4 U+0035;U+0035 # DIGIT FIVE 5;5 U+0036;U+0036 # DIGIT SIX 6;6 U+0037;U+0037 # DIGIT SEVEN 7;7 U+0038;U+0038 # DIGIT EIGHT 8;8 U+0039;U+0039 # DIGIT NINE 9;9 U+0430;U+0430 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A а;а U+0431;U+0431 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER BE б;б U+0432;U+0432 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER VE в;в U+0433;U+0433 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER GHE г;г U+0434;U+0434 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER DE д;д U+0435;U+0435 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER IE е;е U+0436;U+0436 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ZHE ж;ж U+0437;U+0437 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ZE з;з U+0438;U+0438 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER I и;и U+0439;U+0439 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHORT I й;й U+043A;U+043A # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER KA к;к U+043B;U+043B # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EL л;л U+043C;U+043C # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EM м;м U+043D;U+043D # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EN н;н U+043E;U+043E # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER O о;о U+043F;U+043F
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Diffusivity of (U,Er)O2 Solid Solutions As a Function of Ero1.5 Content
    Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting Busan, Korea, October 27-28, 2005 Thermal Diffusivity of (U,Er)O2 Solid Solutions As a Function of ErO1.5 Content Si-Hyung Kim,a Chang-Young Joung,a Yeon-Ku Kim,a Soo-Chul Lee, a Sang-Ho Na,a Young-Woo Lee,a Han-Soo Kim,a Dong-Joo Kim b a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O. Box 105, Daejeon 305-600, South Korea. [email protected] b Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, South Korea 1. Introduction Table 1. Sample characteristics of the UO2 and (U,Er)O2 pellets. Thermal conductivity is one of the most important ErO Lattice Sintered Relative properties of nuclear reactor fuel pellets, as it directly 1.5 Thickness influences the fuel operating temperatures, and the fuel content parameter density density (mm) 3 operating temperature directly affects the fuel (mol%) (nm) (g/cm ) (%T.D.) performance and behaviors such as fission gas release and 0 1.104 0.5470 10.66 97.3 swelling. A number of studies related to the effects of the 1 0.996 0.5468 10.52 96.2 addition of burnable poison such as GdO1.5 to the thermal 3 1.041 0.5465 10.40 95.4 conductivity of UO2 have been published [1]. However, 5 1.058 0.5461 10.41 95.8 there is no report on the thermal conductivity for an Er- 7 1.092 0.5455 10.40 95.8 doped UO2 pellet. 10 1.094 0.5444 10.44 96.5 In this work, thermal diffusivities of near- 20 1.000 0.5419 10.39 97.3 stoichiometric (U1-yEry)O2 solid solutions, 0≤y≤0.1, were determined from room temperature to 1673K.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyrillic # Version Number
    ############################################################### # # TLD: xn--j1aef # Script: Cyrillic # Version Number: 1.0 # Effective Date: July 1st, 2011 # Registry: Verisign, Inc. # Address: 12061 Bluemont Way, Reston VA 20190, USA # Telephone: +1 (703) 925-6999 # Email: [email protected] # URL: http://www.verisigninc.com # ############################################################### ############################################################### # # Codepoints allowed from the Cyrillic script. # ############################################################### U+0430 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A U+0431 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER BE U+0432 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER VE U+0433 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER GE U+0434 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER DE U+0435 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER IE U+0436 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ZHE U+0437 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ZE U+0438 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER II U+0439 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHORT II U+043A # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER KA U+043B # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EL U+043C # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EM U+043D # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EN U+043E # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER O U+043F # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER PE U+0440 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ER U+0441 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ES U+0442 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER TE U+0443 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER U U+0444 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EF U+0445 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER KHA U+0446 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER TSE U+0447 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER CHE U+0448 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHA U+0449 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHCHA U+044A # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER HARD SIGN U+044B # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YERI U+044C # CYRILLIC
    [Show full text]
  • Psftx-Opensuse-15.0/Pancyrillic.F16.Psfu Linux Console Font Codechart
    psftx-opensuse-15.0/pancyrillic.f16.psfu Linux console font codechart Glyphs 0x000 to 0x0FF 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 0x00_ 0x01_ 0x02_ 0x03_ 0x04_ 0x05_ 0x06_ 0x07_ 0x08_ 0x09_ 0x0A_ 0x0B_ 0x0C_ 0x0D_ 0x0E_ 0x0F_ Page 1 Glyphs 0x100 to 0x1FF 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 0x10_ 0x11_ 0x12_ 0x13_ 0x14_ 0x15_ 0x16_ 0x17_ 0x18_ 0x19_ 0x1A_ 0x1B_ 0x1C_ 0x1D_ 0x1E_ 0x1F_ Page 2 Font information 0x017 U+221E INFINITY Filename: psftx-opensuse-15.0/pancyrillic.f16.p 0x018 U+2191 UPWARDS ARROW sfu PSF version: 1 0x019 U+2193 DOWNWARDS ARROW Glyph size: 8 × 16 pixels 0x01A U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW Glyph count: 512 Unicode font: Yes (mapping table present) 0x01B U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW 0x01C U+2039 SINGLE LEFT-POINTING Unicode mappings ANGLE QUOTATION MARK 0x000 U+FFFD REPLACEMENT 0x01D U+2040 CHARACTER TIE CHARACTER 0x01E U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING 0x001 U+2022 BULLET TRIANGLE 0x002 U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND, 0x01F U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT TRIANGLE 0x003 U+2320 TOP HALF INTEGRAL 0x020 U+0020 SPACE 0x004 U+2321 BOTTOM HALF INTEGRAL 0x021 U+0021 EXCLAMATION MARK 0x005 U+2013 EN DASH 0x022 U+0022 QUOTATION MARK 0x006 U+2014 EM DASH 0x023 U+0023 NUMBER SIGN 0x007 U+2026 HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS 0x024 U+0024 DOLLAR SIGN 0x008 U+201A SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION 0x025 U+0025 PERCENT SIGN MARK 0x026 U+0026 AMPERSAND 0x009 U+201E DOUBLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK 0x027 U+0027 APOSTROPHE 0x00A U+2018 LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION 0x028 U+0028 LEFT PARENTHESIS MARK 0x00B U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION 0x029 U+0029 RIGHT PARENTHESIS MARK 0x02A U+002A ASTERISK
    [Show full text]
  • Church Slavonic Fonts
    Church Slavonic Fonts Aleksandr Andreev∗ Nikita Simmons September 6, 2020 version 2.2 (pdf file generated on September 6, 2020) Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 License ................................ 3 1.2 Description .............................. 3 1.3 Installation and Usage ........................ 3 1.3.1 Font Formats ........................ 4 1.4 Source Packages ........................... 4 1.5 System Requirements ........................ 4 1.5.1 Microsoft Windows ..................... 5 1.5.2 GNU/Linux ......................... 5 1.5.3 OS X ............................. 5 1.6 Private Use Area ........................... 5 2 OpenType Tenology 6 2.1 On Microsoft Windows ....................... 6 2.2 On GNU/Linux ............................ 7 2.3 OpenType Features ......................... 7 2.3.1 Combining Mark Positioning ............... 7 2.3.2 Glyph Composition and Decomposition ......... 8 2.3.3 Language-based Features ................. 8 2.3.4 Stylistic Alternatives and Stylistic Sets .......... 9 2.4 SIL Graphite Technology ...................... 9 2.5 Support of Advanced Features in LibreOffice ........... 10 ∗ Comments may be directed to [email protected]. 1 3 Fonts for Synodal Slavonic 10 3.1 Ponomar Unicode .......................... 10 3.1.1 Advanced Features of the Font .............. 13 4 Fonts for Pre-Nikonian Printed Slavonic 15 4.1 Fedorovsk Unicode ......................... 15 4.1.1 Advanced Features of the Font .............. 16 5 Fonts for Working with Ancient Manuscripts 18 5.1 Menaion Unicode .......................... 18 5.1.1 Advanced Features of the Font .............. 18 6 Fonts for Academic Work 18 6.1 Monomakh Unicode ......................... 18 6.1.1 Advanced Features of the Font .............. 22 6.2 Shafarik ............................... 24 7 Decorative Fonts 24 7.1 Indiction Unicode .......................... 24 7.2 Vertograd Unicode .......................... 25 7.3 Cathisma Unicode .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Very Truq. 1Anuary 19, 1942
    Jam1a17 2Z.1942 llr. IC., L. Lynch Bahl• Idaho Dear ~. Lynch, Thia ia 1n reply to you1" lettff of Ja.nuuy 15 which a:rriwd in J1Q" abflenae. If" the !.i:um.boldt I-iet&llia• Corporation is installing a plant or doillg any work on their properly in omrtral CTefiD':l 1 a.l'!J. not «ftre or 11;. I spent part of lant ~k in the disb-1.dt -4 dit! not learn of an, acrt1't'itie• at the property in question. If }Ji:. ,~1th or J,:r. I• isher ere IE< 11h16 any stock in C:~gon in the lfamboldt ~ioa Corporation I 9:'l not swo.N of it. 1"1o discouraged tba on naing en agplittati.on in Oregon and they he:ve no permit to sell ......,. 1t!ea in the utate. I did ffl9.ke a ttoip to tlvt property in question and found ,e. ;:•r. J'olm­ Hll 1n cha.rge of n little dovelop:tSnt \l!llfk that 11&9 goin& 011. The reaulta obu.ined by Jonnson did not lend attraction ~ the property and on the . 'baaia ot th1a 'Yiait l diaomn.ged Sld'\h fNII further wer~ r.ct-t.ainly I tWtW iali}jta;;.t&lXNd the property u _. ~ of jun!tying stvck &ale. Very truq. 1anuary 19, 1942 Dear Ir. L7noh, Ir. IJ.xon i1 &bae11t from the otttc•, ud J01II' letter to h1a dated .January 15 •Ul be bro-qht to hi• attention upon hie return. Ver7 truly 1oure, r. I. Libbe7 Mining ln&ineer f1L1Jr Buhl, Idaho January 15, 1942 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Programa Escuchar Encuesta a Nivel Individual
    PROGRAMA ESCUCHAR ENCUESTA A NIVEL INDIVIDUAL-ENCUESTA MADRE Language | LOOP FROM 1 TO [NUMBER OF HH MEMBERS] DO 1 English | ENDDO 2 Spanish | 3 Mayan | CS001 4 Proxy Spanish | Le máako’ tu yóotaj ka k’áatchi’ita’ak u ti’al le meyaja’ 5 Proxy Mayan | 1 bey 6 Proxy English | 2 ma' | < > Different to | IF CS001 = 2 THEN | | CS001_no | Ma’ tu páajtal k-dzo’okesik le k’áatchi’ wáa ma’ ta éejentiko’. | | EXIT | ENDIF | | CS004 | Le máax kun k’áatchi’itbila’ je’el u páajtal u núukike’ | 1 bey | 2 ma' | | IF CS004 = 2 THEN | | CS005 | Páajchaj a wilik u jeel le máax ku k’áatchi’ita’al ti’al u | chúukpajal le k’áatchi’ unaj a beetik ti’ leti’o’. | 1 bey | 2 ma' | | IF CS005 = 1 THEN | | | | [Questions CS006_a to CS006_c are displayed as a table] | | | | CS006_a | | Bix u k’aaba’chúuka’an u jeel le máax kun k’áatchi’ibilo’ | | String | | | | CS006_b | | Bix u k’aaba’ chúuka’an le máax kun k’áatchi’itbil tu jeel le | | máax tukulta’an u k’áatchi’ita’alo’. | | String | | | | CS006_c | | Bix u k’aaba’ chúuka’an le máax kun k’áatchi’itbil tu jeel le | | máax tukulta’an u k’áatchi’ita’alo’. | | String | | | | CS007 | | Máax ti’ le aj núuk t’aan le máax yéeya’ab ti’al | | k’áatchi’ibil tu jeelo’. | | 2 U NÚUP'UL | | 3 U XIBIL PAAL (CH'PU PAAL) | | 4 U MAJAN PAAL | | 5 U MÁAT PAAL | | 6 LE MÁAX OKE’ESA’B ICHIL LE NAJA’ | | 7 U NA’/ U TAATA | | 8 U KA’YUUM(U KA' NA') | | 9 U NOOL | | 10 U YÁABIL | | 11 U X-KA’ AABIL | | 12 U JA’AN/ U YILIB | | 13 U SU’KU’UN/ U MAJAN SUKU’UN | | 14 U BAAL | | 15 U DZE’ YUUM | | 16 U SOOB | | 17 CHÉEN U LÁAK’ U LÁAK’ALAAL | | 18 MA’ U LÁAK’ALI’/ MIXMÁAK TI’ | | | | CS008 | | Le máax núukt le k’áatchi’o’ ti’ kaja’an xan te najo’ | | 1 bey | | 2 ma' | | | ENDIF | | IF CS005 = 2 THEN | | | | noInterview | | ENT: No hay nadie disponible para completar la entrevista principal.
    [Show full text]