DOCSLIB.ORG

How Exxonmobil and the Oil Industry Benefit from the 2005 Energy Bill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Exxonmobil and the Oil Industry Benefit from the 2005 Energy Bill August 2005 How ExxonMobil and the Oil Industry Benefit from the 2005 Energy Bill Big Money to Big Oil How ExxonMobil and the Oil Industry Benefit from the 2005 Energy Bill August 2005 1 Acknowledgements Written by Alison Cassady, Research Director with the U.S. PIRG Education Fund © 2005, U.S. PIRG Education Fund Cover photo of the LNG tanker courtesy of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Cover photo of Granite Point oil platform, Cook Inlet, Alaska, courtesy of Robert Visser/Greenpeace. Cover photo of Exxon gas station sign taken by Alison Cassady. U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) is the national association of the state PIRGs. The state PIRGs are a network of independent, state-based, citizen-funded organizations that work to protect our environment, encourage a fair and sustainable economy, and foster a responsive democratic government. U.S. PIRG and the U.S. PIRG Education Fund are founding members of the Exxpose Exxon campaign. The Exxpose Exxon campaign is a collaborative effort of several of the nation’s largest environmental and public interest advocacy organizations to activate and educate the public about ExxonMobil, the world’s largest and most irresponsible oil company. For more information about the campaign, visit the campaign’s website at www.ExxposeExxon.com. U.S. PIRG Education Fund 218 D Street SE Washington, DC 20003 (202) 546-9707 www.uspirg.org 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6 Trampling on States’ Rights ................................................................................................. 7 Siting Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities.............................................................................. 7 Drilling America’s Fragile Coasts ...................................................................................... 8 Limiting States’ Control of Their Coasts............................................................................ 8 Fleecing Taxpayers and the Federal Treasury..................................................................... 10 Royalty Relief and Subsidies for Deepwater Drilling....................................................... 10 Royalty Relief for Drilling in Alaska............................................................................... 11 “Royalties-in-Kind” Program ......................................................................................... 11 Tax Breaks for Profitable Oil Companies......................................................................... 12 Exempting the Oil Industry from Environmental Protections ............................................ 12 Polluting America’s Waterways ...................................................................................... 12 Polluting America’s Drinking Water ............................................................................... 12 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 15 Notes .................................................................................................................................. 16 3 Executive Summary As the oil industry continues to collect Trampling on States’ Rights record profits from high oil and gasoline prices, President George Bush is poised to • The new energy law preempts state sign into law an energy bill that allows the authority in the siting and construction of oil companies to pay even less in taxes and liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities, less in royalties for publicly-owned which pose legitimate safety concerns best resources. Meanwhile, the new energy law addressed by states and local communities. will exempt the oil industry from several The law also weakens states’ rights under environmental laws, allowing even the the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act most profitable companies to pollute our in the permitting of LNG facilities and waterways and drinking water. Finally, on natural gas pipelines. ExxonMobil and several issues that affect the oil and gas Qatar Petroleum have plans to deliver 15.6 industry, the new energy law will wrest million tons a year of LNG from Qatar to decision-making power away from state the U.S. As such, ExxonMobil is working and local governments, giving it instead to to build onshore LNG receiving terminals more industry-friendly federal agencies. near Corpus Christi and Port Arthur, ExxonMobil, the world’s largest private oil Texas and potentially more. The new company, could benefit handsomely from energy law will make it easier for this flawed energy plan. ExxonMobil to win approval for these and future LNG facilities even if the states or The energy bill that passed the House on local communities object. July 28, 2005 and the Senate on July 29, 2005 includes at least $4 billion in • The new energy law calls for conducting subsidies and tax breaks for the oil a “seismic inventory” of oil and gas in the industry, which is reaping enormous Outer Continental Shelf along America’s windfalls at a time of rising oil and coasts, including areas that are currently gasoline prices. Between April and June off-limits to energy development. This 2005, BP recorded profits of $5 billion and could pave the way for offshore drilling in ConocoPhillips $3.1 billion. ExxonMobil’s protected areas, such as Florida’s Gulf second quarter profits of almost $8 billion coast. The energy policy also limits states’ gave the company more than $15 billion in ability to influence and participate in profits in the first half of 2005 alone. This decisions about federal projects that affect adds to the company’s record-breaking their coasts. ExxonMobil could reap the profit of $24 billion in 2004. benefits of easier access to coastal waters. Aera Energy, a joint venture of Rather than moving America toward a ExxonMobil and Shell, owns more than cleaner energy future, the new energy law half of the 36 undeveloped leases along is a boon to Big Oil. ExxonMobil, as the California’s southern coast. Moreover, largest and most profitable private oil ExxonMobil already is one of the largest company in the world, stands to benefit drillers in the Gulf of Mexico. from this energy policy in several ways. 4 Fleecing Taxpayers and the Federal currently has an interest in 187,000 acres Treasury on- and off-shore. • The new energy law also will allow the oil Polluting America’s Water industry to avoid paying its fair share of taxes and royalties for publicly-owned • Several provisions of the new energy resources. It offers the oil industry, policy will weaken the Clean Water Act including ExxonMobil, $1.7 billion in new and Safe Drinking Water Act, allowing tax breaks and untold millions in ExxonMobil and other oil companies to additional “royalty relief” programs to pollute America’s waterways and drinking make oil and gas development cheaper and water with impunity. more profitable. Although the Bush administration embraced the final energy • The new energy law allows the producers bill, Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman and distributors of MTBE, a toxic gasoline berated the bill’s tax breaks and royalty additive, to remove new MTBE claims exemptions to oil and gas companies “that from state court to federal court. This don’t need incentives with oil and gas could unfairly deprive injured parties of prices being what they are today.” their right to have claims heard in state courts and could derail legal claims. • The new energy law will suspend the ExxonMobil is one of the country’s top payment of royalties for publicly-owned MTBE producers and also owns service oil and gas from offshore leases in the stations across the country implicated in deeper waters of the Gulf of Mexico. In MTBE contamination of groundwater. addition, the law authorizes up to $1.5 billion in new subsidies to the oil industry Even though ExxonMobil stands to for ultra-deepwater oil drilling and benefit a great deal from this energy exploration. ExxonMobil is an industry policy, the company has the power to leader in deepwater development and direct the oil industry and American estimates that deepwater oil and gas will decision-makers toward a new energy account for more than 20 percent of the future. As the largest independent energy company’s production by 2010. company in the world, ExxonMobil’s decisions can affect the rest of the industry • The new energy law will allow the oil over the long term. The “Exxpose Exxon” industry to forgo royalty payments to the coalition, comprised of a dozen of the federal treasury for oil drilled in areas off nation’s largest environmental and public Alaska’s coastline. It also offers royalty interest groups, calls on ExxonMobil to exemptions for natural gas production on use its leadership position to craft a new the Outer Continental Shelf and for on- energy strategy that goes beyond drilling shore federal lands in Alaska. According to the last drop. to the State of Alaska, ExxonMobil 5 Introduction Big Oil hit payday with the energy weakens environmental protections while legislation passed in July 2005, collecting a doing nothing to reduce America’s bevy of tax breaks, subsidies, and other dependence on oil or relieve consumers at incentives despite rising oil and gasoline the pump. prices and record profits. Even though ExxonMobil stands to Between
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Potential Influences on the Prospect of Renewable Energy Development in OPEC Members Hanan Alsadi1 1. Introduction the Global
    1 Potential Influences on the Prospect of Renewable Energy Development in OPEC Members Hanan Alsadi1 1. Introduction The global energy transitioning trend escalates due to the continuous growth of energy consumption and advancing climate change. While the total fossil fuel consumption is increasing twice as fast as the average rate over the last decade, making 70% of the global energy demand, the reckless use of fossil fuel is causing substantial damage to the environment (International Energy Agency, 2018; Šolc, 2013). An effective fix to the problem while dubious is to replace the energy source by alternatives. The renewable energy (RE) offers the most definite prospect for producing clean, sustainable power in substantial quantities, which arouses interest around the world. According to Gielen and Colleagues (2019), the RE’s share of global consumption energy would rise from 15% in 2015 to 63% in 2050. However, if this increasing trend in renewable energies would also prevail among Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), is subject to debate. They all have abundant potential to invest in renewable energy sources. Yet, some of the Middle Eastern and Arab Gulf OPEC members do not have or have a small amount of renewable energy sources. In contrast, other members have significant renewable energy sources. Researchers have studied some aspects of renewable energy and its relationship to the OPEC countries. For example, Wittmann (2013) looked at the potential for transitioning from petroleum exportation to renewable energy exportation among the OPEC countries. Still, Wittmann does not explain any specific transition strategies or plans for the Middle Eastern OPEC countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercialization and Deployment at NREL: Advancing Renewable
    Commercialization and Deployment at NREL Advancing Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency at Speed and Scale Prepared for the State Energy Advisory Board NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Management Report NREL/MP-6A42-51947 May 2011 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: mailto:[email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Offshore Wind Energy Development: Values and Implications for Recreation and Tourism
    OCS Study BOEM 2018-013 Atlantic Offshore Wind Energy Development: Values and Implications for Recreation and Tourism US Department of the Interior Bu reau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs OCS Study BOEM 2018-013 Atlantic Offshore Wind Energy Development: Values and Implications for Recreation and Tourism March 2018 Authors: George Parsons Jeremy Firestone Prepared under M12AC00017 By University of Delaware 210 Hullihen Hall, Newark, DE 19716-0099 US Department of the Interior Bu reau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs DISCLAIMER Study collaboration and funding were provided by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, under Agreement Number M12AC00017. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Data and Information Systems webpage (http://www.boem.gov/Environmental-Studies- EnvData/), click on the link for the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS), and search on 2018-013. The report is also available at the National Technical Reports Library at https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/. CITATION Parsons, G. Firestone, J. 2018. Atlantic Offshore Wind Energy Development: Values and Implications for Recreation and Tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Energy Situation and Its Future and the New Energy Security Concept
    ThirdThird OPECOPEC InternationalInternational SeminarSeminar ChinaChina’’ss EnergyEnergy SituationSituation andand itsits FutureFuture aandnd thethe NewNew EnergyEnergy SecuritySecurity ConceptConcept Ambassador TANG Guoqiang Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations and other International Organizations in Vienna Vienna September 12th, 2006 OutlinesOutlines I.I. TheThe CurrentCurrent EnergyEnergy SituationSituation inin ChinaChina II.II. ChinaChina’’ss FutureFuture EnergyEnergy PolicyPolicy III.III. ChinaChina’’ss NewNew EnergyEnergy SecuritySecurity ConceptConcept I.I. CurrentCurrent EnergyEnergy SituationSituation inin ChinaChina China has become one of the world largest energy producers and consumers and in 2005 Primary energy production: equivalent to 2.06 billion tons of standard coal, increased 9.5% over the previous year Coal production: 38 % of the world the 1st largest producer Crude oil production: 180 million tons ranking the 6th in the world Hydro-electricity: 401 billion kw hours ranking 1st in the world 93% Consumption: equivalent to 2.22 billion tons of standard coal Energy self-sufficiency rate: 93 % Energy self-sufficiency rate: 93 % Energy Self-sufficiency Rate HugeHuge exploitativeexploitative potentialpotential inin ChinaChina By the end of 2005 Total conventional energy recourses: 823 billion standard tons of coal Proven recoverable deposits : 139.2 billion standard tons of coal 10.1 % of the world Proven coal deposit: 12 % of the world No. 1 rank the 3rd of the world No.
    [Show full text]
  • GGGI Technical Guideline No.4 – Green Energy Development
    1 GGGI Technical Guideline No.4 Green Energy Development NOVEMBER 2017 2 Acknowledgment The Green Energy Development Guidelines were developed under the guidance and leadership of Per Olof Bertilsson, Assistant Director-General of the Planning and Implementation Division at the Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI). Dereje Senshaw, Principal Specialist at GGGI, prepared the guidelines. The report benefited considerably from the review and input of GGGI experts, namely Katerina Syngellakis, Carol Litwin, Dagmar Zwebe, Pheakdey Heng, Jisu Min, Walelign Girma Teka, Gulshan Vashistha, Ahmed Alamra, Karolien Casaer, Chan Ho Park, Srabani Roy, and Inhee Chung. The final draft benefited from valuable editorial and design support by Darren Karjama, Eric Plunkett, Jeong Won Kim, Feelgeun Song, Eliza Villarino, Julie Robles, and Miguel Laranjo. 3 Contents LIST OF BOXES 5 LIST OF FIGURES 6 LIST OF TABLES 6 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE GUIDELINES 9 1.2 DEFINITIONS OF KEYWORDS AND PHRASES 9 1.3 HOW TO USE THE GUIDELINES 12 1.4 TARGET USERS OF THE GUIDELINES 12 1.5 WHY GREEN ENERGY DEVELOPMENT? 12 CHAPTER 2: GGGI AND GREEN ENERGY 13 DEVELOPMENT 2.1 ENERGY’S DESIRED STRATEGIC OUTCOMES 13 2.2 GGGI’S GUIDING PRINCIPLES ON SERVICE DELIVERY 14 2.3 GGGI’S MAJOR ACTIVITIES IN ENERGY SERVICE DELIVERY TO ACHIEVE 14 ENERGY OUTCOMES 2.4 INTERVENTION APPROACHES AND MAJOR SERVICE OFFERINGS 15 2.4.1 GGGI intervention approach: Inclusive green energy investment 15 2.4.2 GGGI’s major service offerings in the energy thematic area 16 CHAPTER 3: HOW TO PLAN AND DEVELOP GREEN 19 ENERGY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS 3.1 PHASE I: DIAGNOSIS 20 3.1.1 Macroeconomic review 20 3.1.2 Policy framework assessment and strengthening 20 3.1.3 Institutional assessment 21 4 3.2 PHASE II: GREEN IMPACT ASSESSMENT 21 3.3 PHASE III: ENERGY SECTOR/SUBSECTOR STRATEGY AND PLANNING 23 3.3.1 Step 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Tax Avoidance Submission
    name jurisdiction_dincorporation_date ibcRUC node_id sourceID 1 ESSO (BM-S-EIGHT) BRAZIL EXPLORATION LIMITED Bahamas 19-Jul-06 144579B 20144579 Bahamas Leaks 2 ESSO (BM-S-ELEVEN) BRAZIL EXPLORATION LIMITED Bahamas 11-Aug-06 144827B 20144827 Bahamas Leaks 3 ESSO (BM-S-NINE) BRAZIL EXPLORATION LIMITED Bahamas 11-Aug-06 144831B 20144831 Bahamas Leaks 4 ESSO (BM-S-TEN) BRAZIL EXPLORATION LIMITED Bahamas 11-Aug-06 144830B 20144830 Bahamas Leaks 5 ESSO (BM-S-TWENTY TWO) BRAZIL EXPLORATION LIMITED Bahamas 25-Jan-00 102571B 20102571 Bahamas Leaks 6 ESSO (BM-S-TWENTY-FOUR) BRAZIL EXPLORATION LIMITED Bahamas 11-Aug-06 144829B 20144829 Bahamas Leaks 7 ESSO (BM-S-TWENTY-ONE) BRAZIL EXPLORATION LIMITED Bahamas 11-Aug-06 144828B 20144828 Bahamas Leaks 8 ESSO (ROUND NINE) BRAZIL EXPLORATION LIMITED Bahamas 2-Nov-07 151113B 20151113 Bahamas Leaks 9 ESSO ANGOLA (THIRTY) LIMITED Bahamas 1-Sep-99 95609B 20095609 Bahamas Leaks 10 ESSO ANGOLA (TWENTY EIGHT) LIMITED Bahamas 1-Sep-99 95607B 20095607 Bahamas Leaks 11 ESSO ANGOLA (TWENTY NINE) LIMITED Bahamas 1-Sep-99 95608B 20095608 Bahamas Leaks 12 ESSO ANGOLA (TWENTY SEVEN) LIMITED Bahamas 1-Sep-99 95606B 20095606 Bahamas Leaks 13 ESSO ANGOLA (TWENTY SIX) LIMITED Bahamas 1-Sep-99 95610B 20095610 Bahamas Leaks 14 ESSO ANGOLA GAS COMPANY LIMITED Bahamas 16-Jan-01 117958B 20117958 Bahamas Leaks 15 ESSO ANGOLA INVESTMENTS LIMITED Bahamas 20-Aug-01 120962B 20120962 Bahamas Leaks 16 ESSO BOLIVA LIMITED Bahamas 11-Aug-95 35376B 20035376 Bahamas Leaks 17 ESSO BRAZIL INVESTMENTS LIMITED Bahamas 30-Nov-00 116707B 20116707
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Regional Opportunities in the U.S. for Clean Energy Technology Innovation Volume 1
    About the Cover The images on the cover represent regional capabilities and resources of energy technology innovation across the United States from nuclear energy to solar and photovoltaics, and smart grid electricity to clean coal and carbon capture. Disclaimer This volume is one of two volumes and was written by the Department of Energy. This volume summarizes the results of university-hosted regional forums on regional clean energy technology innovation. The report draws on the proceedings and reports produced by the universities noted in Volume 2 for some of its content; as a result, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the Department or the Administration. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. Message from the Secretary of Energy The U.S. Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is pleased to present this report, Exploring Regional Opportunities in the U.S. for Clean Energy Technology Innovation. The report represents DOE’s summary of the insights gained through fourteen university-hosted workshop events held nationwide during the spring and summer of 2016. These events brought together members of Congress, governors, other federal, state, tribal, and local officials, academic leaders, private sector energy leaders, DOE officials, and other stakeholders from economic development organizations and nongovernmental organizations to examine clean energy technology innovation from a regional perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • GISB/NAESB/DUNS Cross Reference File As of 11/11/99
    GISB/NAESB/D-U-N-S Cross Reference File as of 11/11/99 (Updated in July 2017) Entity Common Code Entity Name Validation? 139329114 1 SOURCE ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY NO 079350872 1 SOURCE ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY NO 877675801 1564 EAST LANCASTER AVENUE BUSINESS TRUST NO 078256054 3-T EXPLORATION INC NO 078256054 3-T EXPLORATION, INC. NO 879801330 7777 DRILLING CORPORATION NO 038777025 A & A ENERGY PROPERTIES LTD NO 046425476 A & Z PRODUCTION AGENT NO 030215529 A 1 TECH SPECIALTY STEEL CORP NO 006308407 A B CHANCE CO NO 099870842 A B STEEL MILL INC NO 618464036 A C HUMKO CORPORATION NO 122320559 A E STALEY MFG CO NO 004196564 A I ROOT COMPANY NO 009839077 A L ABERCROBMIE INC NO 054681739 A M GENERAL NO 008223349 A MILLER OIL COMPANY NO 006439327 A O SMITH APPLIED ELEC. PRODUCTS NO 006504005 A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC NO 185110566 A P PARTS COMPANY NO 004232823 A W B METALS NO 006085815 A. O. SMITH CORPORATION NO 134807635 A.J. Rowe & Associates, Inc. NO 016384125 A-1 COMPRESSOR INC NO left blan A-1 TOOL AND MACHINE COMPANY NO 188747539 AA PRODUCTION INC NO 188747539 AA Production, Inc. NO 004916458 AACTRON INC NO 147926042 AAR BROOKS & PERKINS NO 015692064 AARON & JANA PARRY NO 148482227 AARON OIL COMPANY, INC NO 557103520 AARROWCAST, INC. NO 604739748 AB OPERATING CO NO 609774435 ABB POWER T&D CO INC NO 196081384 Abbott Laboratories NO left blan ABBYVILLE KANSAS, CITY OF NO 795450634 ABITIBI PRICE NO 618089494 ABPS ENERGY, INC. NO 046824746 ABQ Energy Group, Ltd MbrRev063017 049824746 ABQ Energy Group, Ltd NO 075612648 ABRAHAM LINCOLN MEMORIAL HOSP NO 088482898 ABRAXAS PRODUCTION CORP NO 193777971 ABS Energy LLC MbrRev063017 099867038 ABX AIR INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Technologies for Rural Development
    U N I T E D N ATIONS CONFEREN C E O N T R A D E A N D D EVELOPMENT Renewable Energy Technologies for Rural Development U N C T A D C U RRE nt S tud IE S O N S C IE nc E , T E C H N OLOGY and I nn OV at IO N . N º 1 UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT UNCTAD CURRENT STUDIES ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Renewable Energy Technologies for Rural Development UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2010 UNCTAD CURRENT STUDIES ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION. NO.1 Notes The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) serves as the lead entity within the United Nations Secretariat for matters related to science and technology as part of its work on the integrated treatment of trade and development, investment and finance. The current work programme of UNCTAD is based on the mandates set at UNCTAD XII, held in 2008 in Accra, Ghana, as well as on the decisions by the United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD), which is served by the UNCTAD secretariat. UNCTAD’s work programme is built on its three pillars of research analysis, consensus-building and technical cooperation, and is carried out through intergovernmental deliberations, research and analysis, technical assistance activities, seminars, workshops and conferences. This series of publications seeks to contribute to exploring current issues in science, technology and innovation, with particular emphasis on their impact on developing countries. The term “country” as used in this study also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas; the designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploiting Underutilised Waste Heat to Generate Environmental Friendly
    International Journal of M echanical Engineering (IJME) ISSN(P): 2319 - 2240; ISSN( E ): 2319 - 2259 Vol. 5, Issue 3, Apr - May 2016; 1 - 10 © IASET EXPLOITING UNDERUTILISEDWASTE HEAT TO GENERATE ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY ENERGY OL AYODELE & MTE KAHN Cape Peninsula University of Technology , Cape Town, South Africa ABSTRACT The growing concern over the continued usage of fossil fuels for electrical energy generation and hence the need to sign ificantly reduce reliance on this non - renewable energy source as well as the requirement for long - lived power supplies have necessitated the pragmatic shift towards the realization of cleaner, safer, and renewable energy sources. The increasing interest in space exploration, satellite activities, structural health monitoring and terrestrial monitoring in harsh and inaccessible environments place a high demand for energy sources for autonomous systems . The existing battery technologies that can be utilized for autonomous systems are plagued by short - life, low energy storage density, associated unwanted maintenance burdens of recharging or replacement and disposal of unwanted batteries which poses a threa t to the environment. Autonomous energy sources from waste heat for home appliances and industrial machineries will also mitigate the effect of global warming which threatens the environment as a result of fossil fuel energy based sources that release unde sirable carbon - monoxide into the atmosphere. Thermoelectric energy generation, based on Seebeck effect, an innovative approach to convert heat energy into usable forms can significantly contribute towards sustainable energy development and meet the growing need for power in small scale applications due to its relative advantages over other sources of energy generation. This paper presents an insight into various ways by which underutilize waste heat can be exploited to meet the growing energy demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland As a Case Study
    Sustainable Energy Development: Iceland as a Case Study Brynhildur Davidsdottir, Environment and Natural Resources, University of Iceland ABSTRACT Increasing energy prices, political unrest in the Middle East and climate change are only a few issues that have pushed planning for Sustainable energy development (SED) onto the political horizon. SED is broadly defined as ‘the provision of adequate energy services at affordable cost in a secure and environmentally benign manner, in conformity with social and economic development needs’. Planning for SED implies that we need to consider the three dimensions of sustainable development, where such movement should not have negative consequences for the economy, the public (social dimension), nor the environment. This paper presents the development of the Icelandic Energy System since the year 1900 in this context. Iceland has in the last 40 years gone from being mostly reliant on coal and oil, towards extracting 73% of its primary energy needs from renewable energy, and at the same time achieved impressive economic success. Only the transportation sector relies on fossil fuels, and various experiments are being conducted to significantly reduce the reliance on imported fossil fuels. Some of those experiments include planning for a hydrogen economy by 2050. A central question that is asked in this presentation is if Iceland’s path is indeed sustainable, if it is unique and if other countries possibly can do the same. Sustainable Development Introduction Since the publication of the Brundtland Report (WCED 1987), sustainable development (SD) has evolved from a vague concept into a somewhat coherent development framework. In the Brundland report sustainable development was defined as: “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”.
    [Show full text]
  • Bios for Expert Advisory Group-Jan 2018
    CONTENTS E. KURT ALBAUGHT, PE .......................... 4 INDRAJIT DATTA ................................... 16 EMILY HAZELWOOD.............................. 29 STEPHEN ALLEN ...................................... 4 GRAYUM DAVIS, PE .............................. 17 ROBERT HEILMAN, CEng ....................... 30 HELDER ALVES ........................................ 4 NICHOLAS PAUL de BLOCQ (NICK) ....... 17 BOB HELMKAMP, PE ............................. 30 MARK ANDERSON .................................. 4 DEXTER D. DECKER ............................... 17 NIGEL HILL ............................................ 30 MARTINA ASBURY .................................. 5 WILLEM A. DE MEYER .......................... 18 RICK HILL............................................... 31 CHRISTIAN BAKKEN ................................ 5 FLAVIO de MORAES, PhD, PE ............ 18 EDWARD A. HIRS, III.............................. 31 ADAM LEE BALLARD ............................... 5 W.S. (BILL) DERRICK ............................. 18 JEFF HOCKE, PE, PMP, MBA .................. 31 RAGHU BABU BANGURA ........................ 6 MAURO DESTRI .................................... 19 MARK HOOD ......................................... 31 BILL BARROWS ....................................... 6 JEFF DICE, PE, PMP ............................... 19 WAYNE HUDDLESTON, PE, PMP ........... 32 BRAULIO LUIS BASTOS ............................ 6 PAUL DREISS ........................................ 19 W. T. (BILL) HUGHES ............................. 32 FREDERICK E.
    [Show full text]