DOCSLIB.ORG

2000 Puget Sound Update Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2000 Puget Sound Update Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team 2000 Puget Sound update Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Seventh Report of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program March 2000 Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team P.O. Box 40900 Olympia,Washington 98504-0900 360/407-7300 or 800/54-SOUND http://www.wa.gov/puget_sound The Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team is an equal opportunity employer. If you have special accommodation needs, or need this document in an alternative format, please contact the Action Team’s ADA representative at (360) 407-7300. The Action Team’s TDD number is 1 (800) 833-6388. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is the product of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program and the Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team. Prepared by Action Team staff. Compiled and written by Scott Redman and Lori Scinto. Edited by Melissa Pearlman. Layout and graphics by Toni Weyman Droscher and Jill Williams. The PSAMP Steering and Management committees directed the development of this report. The members of these committees and the following people contributed material, comments and advice. Their contributions were essential to the development of this document. Shelly Ament, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Armstrong Ken Balcomb, Center for Whale Research Greg Bargmann, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Allison Beckett, Washington Department of Ecology John Calambokidis, Cascadia Research Collective Liz Carr, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Denise Clifford, Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Wayne Clifford, Washington Department of Health Andrea Copping, Washington SeaGrant Jennifer Cutler, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission John Dohrmann, Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Graeme Ellis, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada - Pacific Biological Station Mary Farmer, Island County/WSU Beach Watchers Zach Ferdana, People for Puget Sound Sandra Hanson, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Steve Jeffries, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Art Johnson, Washington Department of Ecology Randy McIntosh, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Brenden McFarland, Washington Department of Ecology Nancy McKay, Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Don Melvin, Washington Department of Health Jim Morrison, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada Don Norman, Norman Wildlife Consulting Tom O’Connor, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Wayne Palsson, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Martin Payne, Washington Department of Ecology Blaine Reeves, Washington Department of Agriculture Dave Seiler, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Devin Smith, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Julie Stofel, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Les Swain, British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Land, and Parks Bob Woolrich, Washington Department of Health PSAMP Steering Committee Helen Berry, Washington Department of Natural Resources John Carleton, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Tracy Collier, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center Jay Davis, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tim Determan, Washington Department of Health Bruce Duncan, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 Maggie Dutch, Washington Department of Ecology Ken Dzinbal, Washington Department of Ecology William Ehinger, Washington Department of Ecology Tom Mumford, Washington Department of Natural Resources Jan Newton, Washington Department of Ecology Dave Nysewander, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Sandie O’Neill, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Randy Shuman, King County Department of Natural Resources Kim Stark, King County Department of Natural Resources Jim West, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife PSAMP Management Committee Bill Backous, Washington Department of Ecology Morris Barker, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Duane Fagergren, Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Mary Mahaffy, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Maria Victoria Peeler, Washington Department of Natural Resources Michael Rylko, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 Jennifer Tebaldi, Washington Department of Health John Stein, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Members Action Team and Puget Sound Council Chair—Nancy McKay Cities—Chuck Booth, City of Auburn, Mayor Counties—Louise Miller, King County Council, Vice Chair Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation—Laura Eckert Johnson, Director State Parks & Recreation Commission—Cleve Pinnix, Director Tribes—Daryl Williams, Director, Department of the Environment, The Tulalip Tribes Washington Department of Agriculture—Jim Jesernig, Director Washington Department of Community, Trade & Economic Development—Busse Nutley, Deputy Director Washington Department of Ecology—Tom Fitzsimmons, Director Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife—Jeff Koenings, Director Washington Department of Health—Mary Selecky, Secretary Washington Department of Natural Resources—Kaleen Cottingham, Deputy Commissioner Washington Department of Transportation—Sid Morrison, Secretary Washington State Conservation Commission—Steve Meyer, Executive Director *National Marine Fisheries Service—Will Stelle, Regional Administrator *U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Chuck Clarke, Regional Administrator *U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—Gerry Jackson, Supervisor * indicates non-voting members Puget Sound Council Members Chair, Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team—Nancy McKay Agriculture—Jerry Van der Veen, dairy farmer Business—Kirk Anderson, Fisher Properties, Inc. Cities—Jackie Aitchison, Poulsbo City Council Counties—Rhea Miller, San Juan County Board of County Commissioners Environmental Community—Tom Putnam, Puget Soundkeeper Alliance Shellfish—Bill Dewey, Taylor Shellfish Farms, Inc. Tribes—Fran Wilshusen, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission *Washington State House of Representatives—Representatives Dave Anderson and Gary Chandler *Washington State Senate—Senators Tracey Eide and Pam Roach * indicates non-voting members This report is funded in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsements or recommendations for use. Recommended bibliographic citation: Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team. 2000. 2000 Puget Sound Update: Seventh Report of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program. Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team. Olympia, Washington. Select the text below to link to other sections in the Update S u m m a r y . 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n . 7 Scope of this Document . .8 Protecting and Restoring Puget Sound . .9 P h y s i c a l E n v i r o n m e n t . 1 1 Summary . .11 Findings . .13 The Pacific Ocean and Weather Conditions; Rivers and Input to Puget Sound; Puget Sound’s Marine Waters; Puget Sound’s Shoreline Acting on the Findings . .27 P a t h o g e n s a n d N u t r i e n t s . 2 9 Summary . .29 Pathogen Findings . .32 Rivers and Streams; Department of Ecology Monitoring of Open Marine Waters; Fecal Contamination at Offshore and Nearshore Areas of King County; Fecal Contamination in Commercial Growing Waters Nutrient Findings . .41 Rivers and Streams; Marine Waters Acting on the Findings . .46 T o x i c C o n t a m i n a n t s . 4 7 Summary . .47 Findings . .48 Toxic Contaminants in Water; Sediment Contamination; Toxic Contaminants in Shellfish; Toxic Contaminants in Fish; Toxic Contaminants in Birds and Mammals Acting on the Findings . .67 H u m a n H e a l t h . 6 9 Summary . .69 Findings . .70 Acting on the Findings . .76 B i o l o g i c a l R e s o u r c e s . 7 9 Summary . .79 Findings . .80 Acting on the Findings . .105 C o n c l u s i o n . .1 0 7 C o l o r S e c t i o n . 1 1 1 R e s o u r c e s . 1 1 5 Literature Cited in the 2000 Puget Sound Update . .115 PSAMP Reports . .120 PSAMP Contacts . .125 This seventh Puget Sound Update is based primarily on the findings of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program (PSAMP). The PSAMP is a long-term effort to Environmental indicators investigate environmental trends, improve decision-making and prevent overlaps and reporting duplication in monitoring efforts. The results of the PSAMP are supplemented by the A portion of the information findings of many other efforts to evaluate the condition of Puget Sound’s waters, presented in this report is sediments, nearshore habitats and biological resources. Information presented in this summarized in the Puget Sound report generally reflects conditions through 1998. However, in some cases only older Water Quality Action’s Team environmental indicators document, data were available and in other cases results through 1999 were available and Puget Sound’s Health 2000. The 16- included. page document provides a brief view of the condition of Puget Sound and Signs of environmental degradation from around Puget Sound suggest that the its resources. Copies of Puget Sound’s continuing development in the basin is taking its toll on the Sound. A variety of Health 2000 are available from the Puget Sound organisms appear to be in poor condition or their numbers appear to be Action Team and on-line at: declining. http://www.wa.gov/puget_sound. Environmental degradation in Puget Sound has been documented for many years. Other agencies and organizations produce related environmental High levels of toxic contaminants in urban bays and waterways and widespread indicators and status and trends alteration of Puget Sound’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Tacoma Way, Circa 1913, Photo Courtesy of the Tacoma Public Library, Amzie D
    The west side of the 5200 block of South Tacoma Way, circa 1913, photo courtesy of the Tacoma Public Library, Amzie D. Browning Collection 158 2 011 Historic South Tacoma Way South Tacoma Way Business District In early 2011, Historic Tacoma reached out to the 60+ member South Tacoma Business District Association as part of its new neighborhood initiative. The area is home to one of the city’s most intact historic commercial business districts. A new commuter rail station is due to open in 2012, business owners are interested in S 52nd St taking advantage of City loan and grant programs for façade improvements, and Historic Tacoma sees S Washington St great opportunities in partnering with the district. S Puget Sound Ave The goals of the South Tacoma project are to identify and assess historic structures and then to partner with business owners and the City of Tacoma to conserve and revitalize the historic core of the South Tacoma Business District. The 2011 work plan includes: • conducting a detailed inventory of approximately 50 commercial structures in the historic center of the district • identification of significant and endangered South Way Tacoma properties in the district • development of action plans for endangered properties • production of a “historic preservation resource guide for community leaders” which can be S 54th St used by community groups across the City • ½ day design workshop for commercial property owners • production & distribution of a South Tacoma Business District tour guide and map • nominations to the Tacoma Register of Historic Places as requested by property owners • summer walking tour of the district Acknowledgements Project funding provided by Historic Tacoma, the South Tacoma Business District Association, the South Tacoma Neighborhood Council, the University of Washington-Tacoma, and Jim and Karen Rich.
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Community College Year Three Mid-Cycle Evaluation
    South Puget Sound Community College Year Three Mid-Cycle Evaluation Dr. Timothy Stokes President September, 2014 Table of Contents Report on Year One Recommendation ......................................................................................................... 1 Mission .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Mission Fulfillment .................................................................................................................................... 1 Operational Planning ................................................................................................................................ 2 Core Themes, Objectives and Indicators .................................................................................................. 3 Part II ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Rationale for Indicators of Achievement .................................................................................................. 5 Increase Student Retention (Objective 1.A) ......................................................................................... 5 Support Student Completion (Objective 1.B) ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On-Site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008
    Thurston County Public Health and Social Services Department Environmental Health Division On-Site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Thurston County On-site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Table of Contents: Section Page Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 4 On-site Sewage System Management Plan 8 Part I – Database Enhancement 10 Part 2 – Identification of Sensitive Areas 16 Part 3 – Operation, Monitoring and Maintenance in Sensitive Areas 28 Part 4 – Marine Recovery and Sensitive Area Strategy 34 Part 5 – Education 39 Part 6 – Plan Summary 42 Appendices A – Amanda Reports 53 B – Henderson Watershed Protection Area Description 58 C – Process for Evaluation of Potential MRA’s and LMA’s 62 D – Marine Recovery Area and Local Management Area Designation Tool 63 E – Measurable Outcomes 70 F – Thurston County Septic Park 71 Page 2 of 71 Thurston County On-site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Acknowledgements Thurston County Public Health and Social Services would like to acknowledge all those who have been instrumental in our process to develop our Local Management Plan (LMA). First of all we appreciate the contributions of the Article IV Advisory Committee in assisting the Environmental Health Division. Your dedication to providing direction and tone for the LMA has been invaluable. We would also like to recognize the Environmental Health, Development Services and Geodata staff for supplying input, recommendations and attending committee meetings to offer insight into our program areas. Our appreciation is also extended to the Washington State Department of Health. We are grateful for their staff support and funding. We especially appreciate the use of the guidance document, which has provided section descriptions and format for our plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits
    PNNL-17161 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits Z Yang TP Khangaonkar December 2007 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Prairies the Nature Conservancy of Washington 2007 Conservation Vision
    Conservation Action Planning Report for the SOUTH PUGET SOUND PRAIRIES The Nature Conservancy of Washington 2007 CONSERVATION VISION Successful conservation of the South Puget Sound Prairies will entail elements of protection, active land management and restoration, and integration of the full suite of partners working within the Willamette Valley - Puget Trough - Georgia Basin Ecoregion. The portfolio of protected conservation sites will contain a mosaic of habitats that support the full-range of prairie and oak woodland species. This portfolio will be a total of 20 protected sites, including at least six core areas. The core areas of the portfolio consist of protected sites embedded within a mosaic of land-use that complements prairie conservation and the protected conservation sites. The portfolio will take advantage of the wide-range of microclimates in the South Puget Sound, aimed at providing resiliency to the potential effects of climate change. The South Puget Sound will contribute to the conservation of rare species by promoting and implementing recovery actions throughout their historic range. Active management of the prairie maximizes the contribution to conservation of all portfolio sites. These management actions are coordinated and integrated across a range of partners and landowners. This integration ensures that information transfer is exemplary, that organizations are linked formally and informally and that sufficient resources are generated for all partners. The South Puget Sound Prairies will be a primary source for prairie-specific science and restoration techniques. It will similarly be a source concerning the science and conservation for fragmented natural systems. Prairie conservation in the South Puget Sound will be supported by a community that is actively engaged through a vigorous volunteer program and supports the financial and policy issues that affect prairies.
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Forum Environmental Quality – Economic Vitality Indicators Report Updated July 2006
    South Puget Sound Forum Environmental Quality – Economic Vitality Indicators Report Updated July 2006 Making connections and building partnerships to protect the marine waters, streams, and watersheds of Nisqually, Henderson, Budd, Eld and Totten Inlets The economic vitality of South Puget Sound is intricately linked to the environmental health of the Sound’s marine waters, streams, and watersheds. It’s hard to imagine the South Sound without annual events on or near the water - Harbor Days Tugboat Races, Wooden Boat Fair, Nisqually Watershed Festival, Swantown BoatSwap and Chowder Challenge, Parade of Lighted Ships – and other activities we prize such as beachcombing, boating, fishing, or simply enjoying a cool breeze at a favorite restaurant or park. South Sound is a haven for relaxation and recreation. Businesses such as shellfish growers and tribal fisheries, tourism, water recreational boating, marinas, port-related businesses, development and real estate all directly depend on the health of the South Sound. With strong contributions from the South Sound, statewide commercial harvest of shellfish draws in over 100 million dollars each year. Fishing, boating, travel and tourism are all vibrant elements in the region’s base economy, with over 80 percent of the state’s tourism and travel dollars generated in the Puget Sound Region. Many other businesses benefit indirectly. Excellent quality of life is an attractor for great employees, and the South Puget Sound has much to offer! The South Puget Sound Forum, held in Olympia on April 29, 2006, provided an opportunity to rediscover the connections between economic vitality and the health of South Puget Sound, and to take action to protect the valuable resources of the five inlets at the headwaters of the Puget Sound Basin – Totten, Eld, Budd, Henderson, and the Nisqually Reach.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Eye of the European Beholder Maritime History of Olympia And
    Number 3 August 2017 Olympia: In the Eye of the European Beholder Maritime History of Olympia and South Puget Sound Mining Coal: An Important Thurston County Industry 100 Years Ago $5.00 THURSTON COUNTY HISTORICAL JOURNAL The Thurston County Historical Journal is dedicated to recording and celebrating the history of Thurston County. The Journal is published by the Olympia Tumwater Foundation as a joint enterprise with the following entities: City of Lacey, City of Olympia, City of Tumwater, Daughters of the American Revolution, Daughters of the Pioneers of Washington/Olympia Chapter, Lacey Historical Society, Old Brewhouse Foundation, Olympia Historical Society and Bigelow House Museum, South Sound Maritime Heritage Association, Thurston County, Tumwater Historical Association, Yelm Prairie Historical Society, and individual donors. Publisher Editor Olympia Tumwater Foundation Karen L. Johnson John Freedman, Executive Director 360-890-2299 Katie Hurley, President, Board of Trustees [email protected] 110 Deschutes Parkway SW P.O. Box 4098 Editorial Committee Tumwater, Washington 98501 Drew W. Crooks 360-943-2550 Janine Gates James S. Hannum, M.D. Erin Quinn Valcho Submission Guidelines The Journal welcomes factual articles dealing with any aspect of Thurston County history. Please contact the editor before submitting an article to determine its suitability for publica- tion. Articles on previously unexplored topics, new interpretations of well-known topics, and personal recollections are preferred. Articles may range in length from 100 words to 10,000 words, and should include source notes and suggested illustrations. Submitted articles will be reviewed by the editorial committee and, if chosen for publication, will be fact-checked and may be edited for length and content.
    [Show full text]
  • Correspondence 4.1.1 Robert L. Mcdonald and Lee
    Correspondence 4.1.1 Robert L. McDonald and Lee Swoboda submitted applications for the Hood Canal Coordinating Council Citizens Advisory Group. 4.1.2 Robert McDonald submitted an application for the Housing Authority Board. 4.1.3 Liquor Control Board submitted a marijuana license application for Mayflower Partners and a special occasion license for Rotary Club of South Puget Sound. 4.1.4 Economic Development Council of Mason County submitted their first quarter report. Background: Correspondence received in the Commissioners' office. Recommended Action: None Attachments: Originals on file with the Clerk of the Board. 04-14-15 cc: CMMRS Neatherlin, Sheldon & Jeffreys Clerk ~l\..~ W~ MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 411 NORTH FIFTH STREET C<fP !fr~ · SHEL TON WA 98584 Fax 3601427-8437; Voice 3601427-9670, Ext. 419 MASON COUNTY ... f~~mlM~ POINTMENTTO fki,J.. CO.'no\ Cco\(\\wx:ilijj CbvYlcl \ c_,+~~t>V\ {4c\v,'.SO~G-0 vp D BOARD D COMMITTEE COUNCIL .> ADDRI PHONE CITY/2 WORK C/88( EmMAIL r············C·O·MM.UN.ir< ..s .ERvi«;·E····......... ........... r.E·M·PLOY·M-EN·T·;···(·i·F···RET·i·RE·D:· PREVIOUS I 1AcT1v1T1EsoRMEMBERsH1Ps1 i EXPERIENCE>Ovrwri-10 vvie,mp/&~ ls-1. Daw{ftepl>;Co~/ ch!kqf) COMPANY:,l!JbM lbw YRS IJ6d z ! _ 5°'{00..(v/"1 Btlv't:.or:fl"onrrl pro 0 r~,.,..->s I }.J)\//:; 1/Vo ,.. G~ POSITION: won:--hovfG, l0vb C!r?:;J..- 1 dcJ ~1d ,?/rtXtfr? +~an3 , co~ANY: G-\."j"- f&lonJ1ia YRS I+-' i i ~~ G~ i i PO ION: !JyJinberjf hum.fol ~f;rr;/-IOh 4ew : L.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sound Strategy
    SOUTH SOUND STRATEGY Draft 12-30-16 South Sound Strategy – 0 CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 8 Focus Areas ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Education and Outreach ....................................................................................................................... 9 Adaptive Management ........................................................................................................................ 10 How to Use the South Sound Strategy ................................................................................................ 10 II. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Vision for the South Sound Strategy ................................................................................................... 11 Purpose of the South Sound Strategy ................................................................................................. 11 South Puget Sound Overview .............................................................................................................. 11 South Puget Sound Near Term Actions ............................................................................................... 14 South Puget Sound Assessment Units ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To Our Community
    Giving TOBack OUR COMMUNITY RED WIND CASINO & NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE DONATE OVER $1.7 MILLION IN 2020 Lacey Police Department First Baptist Church of Lakewood Home First Conservation Connection City of Dupont Police Department Advocates for Immigrants in Detention Hoopstars Family Raindancer Wild Bird Rescue City of Yelm Police Department Northwest HWY 507 Young Life Rez Animal Resource Olympia Police Department It Takes a Village Pacific Education Institute Wolf Haven International Thurston County Deputy Jubilee Women’s Center Pizza Klatch Family Education and Support Services Sheriffs Foundation Orting Senior Center Organization Rainy Day Ranch Family Support Center of South Sound Thurston County Emergency Management Parents Against Sexual Abuse Therapeutic Riding Center POWER (Parents Organizing for Welfare & Washington State Patrol Save our Water Tower Wild Grief Econ Rights) Yelm & Rainier Fire Department SE Thurston SPSC Partners for Transition Solutions South Sound Youth Athletics Football South Sound Parent to Parent Fire Authority The DuPont Historical Society South Sound YMCA Gold Star Memorial Foundation Lacey Fire District #3 American Cancer Society Stonewall Youth Olympia School District Lacey Fire District #3 Lifeline Connections Tabu Fastpitch Organization Education Foundation Atayal Inc. Turning Point Survivor Advocacy Center Tenino Young At Heart Theater Olympia Host Lions Club Foundation LaPush 1910 Indian Shaker Church Washington Healthcare Access Alliance USAV Team Providence St. Peter Foundation/Cancer Leimomiwaianue
    [Show full text]
  • South Sound CAMP Project
    South Sound CAMP Project Stage 4 – Final Recommendations January 18, 2011 Acknowledgments and Contacts The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission gratefully acknowledges the many stakeholders and the staff of SeaTac Area state parks who participated in public meetings, reviewed voluminous materials, and made this a better plan because of if. Plan Author Nikki Fields, Parks Planner South Puget Sound State Parks Planning Team Don Hoch, Southwest Region Director Steve Brand, Region Operations Manager Tom Pew, Kopachuck Area Manager Mischa Cowles, Jarrell Cove Area Manager Janet Shonk, Park Ranger Kristie Cronin, Park Ranger Rob Sterling, Park Ranger Terri Heikkila, Southwest Region Parks Development Manager Lisa Lantz, Southwest Region Steward Michael Hankinson, Southwest Region Parks Planner Nikki Fields, Parks Planner Nata Hurst, Administrative Assistant Ryan Karlson, Interpretive Program Manager Peter Herzog, Stewardship Manager Washington State Park and Recreation Commission 1111 Israel Road, P.O. Box 42650 Olympia WA 98504-2650 Tel: (360) 902-8500 Fax: (360) 753-1591 TDD: (360) 664-3133 Commissioners: Fred Olson, Chair Joe Taller, Vice Chair Eliot Scull Patricia Lantz Lucinda Whaley Cecilia Vogt Rodger Schmitt Rex Derr, Director South Sound CAMP Project Stage 4 – Final Recommendations 2 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]