Clarke Repackages HE Support
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Thursday 22 January 2004 Published by the USSU Communications Office issue number 1071 free www.ussu.co.uk THE UNIVERSITY OF SURREY STUDENTS’ NEWSPAPER IN THIS WEEK ’ S PAPER THE BIG VOTE THE FINAL COUNTDOWN As nominations open In the week which will decide COMMENT | Paul Sanderson argues in for this year’s elections, the future of Higher Education, favour of higher University fees | page 4 barefacts tells you exactly barefacts brings you news and UNION | Catherine Lee tells you why websites are considered an ‘art’. | page 8 what it’s like to be a comment articles covering all MUSIC | Jon Allen and Matt Badcock head Sabbatical Officer. sides of the debate... to some Christmas gigs | pages 18 & 19 Elections| page 6 News & Comment| Pages 1-5 The Last Stand BY PHILIP HOWARD poorest backgrounds do not have to pay any fees at all - at NEWS EDITOR worst. If the university offers more than £300 bursary, they will be recieving money through the process, separately THE STORY SO far: A year ago education secretary Charles from the standard student loan. Clarke expects around 30% Clarke unveiled the Higher Education White Paper. This of students to receive the full grant, and 10% to receive a was a statement of intent for the government’s new policies partial grant. According to the statement, universities who on Higher Education, including top-up fees and many other currently have wider access and recruit proportionately reforms. As a result of these policies and some concessions more studenrts from poor backgrounds will be able to use in response to backbench opposition, two weeks ago Mr over 90% of the added income, as opposed to the 70% Clarke introduced the Higher Education Bill, to be voted on previously implied. by parliament next Tuesday. Mr Clarke also mentions the argument given by some In the bill, the government proposes to move fees from groups for combining the grants and fee payment to give the means-tested (£1125) up-front fee currently in place to students more choice over how they use the financial support an institution-set variable fee of up to £3,000 - repaid as a the government gives them. He stated that this raised ‘policy, proportion of earnings above £15,000 after graduation. This financial and practical issues’, and that the government has proved to be the largest problem for the government, remaining student loan (including fees) outstanding after 25 would be ‘examining them in detail’. If they can be resolved, drawing the most criticism. Other proposals are a new grant years - on average, graduates can expect to pay it off in 13 we are told, then they will adopt this approach. available to those from the poorest backgrounds and the years, according to him. Maintenance loans will be raised to Clarke’s final warning to the House was this: “This is a creation of the ‘Office for Fair Access’ to help widen access. the ‘median level’ of student living costs - this will be most coherent package to be taken as a whole or not at all. If not The line below which full support is available has been evident to students living in London, but should raise the supported by this house, none of these benefits will arise. It drawn at £15,200. amount available to students at Surrey. is not a pick and mix menu.” In addition to these, Clarke announced concessions to In his statement on January 8th introducing the bill, Mr The picture above shows Surrey students at the lobby of those opposing the Bill. The impact of variable fees will be Clarke expressed the government’s ‘aspiration’ to provide Parliament on 3rd December 2003. They will be heading assessed via an ‘independent review’ over their first 3 years. the full student loan to all students without means testing, into London again to lobby MPs on 27th January, the very The £3,000 cap will remain in place unless an increase in order to make students more independent from their day when the bill will be read in Parliament - for more is voted through by parliament - this has been added to parents. He also stated the position of those from the poorest information on how USSU have been fighting the fees reassure those who see the cap as a temporary measure to backgrounds - a combination of grants and a minimum proposals, see barefacts opinion on page 6 or pop into the get the bill passed. Also included is a plan to write off any bursary from the university will mean that those from the Students’ Union to speak to one of the Sabbatical Officers. ON MONDAY CHARLES Clarke students, but some would be - less if the grant was lower. out to no eligability for those announced that the £1500 repaid at a later date. In effect This means that the immediate whose assessed family income Clarke living grant and the £1200 fee the students have been offered amount of money the student is more than around £33,000. waiver proposed in the Higher an extra loan of £1200 - instead receives if they take the full An example would be a family Education Bill would be of reducing the (maximum grant and maximum student income of £20,000: the total Repackages combined into a £2,700 package £3,000) top-up fees by £1200, loan would only increase by combined grant would become for those from the poorest the student can opt to take the £350, but their student loan £1,770 instead of £570 with a backgrounds. money to live on, and repay it at would be £850 smaller when £1200 remission on repayable Universities would be required a later date. they start to repay their fees fees. Yet to be finalised are the HE Support to add a minimum bursary of This is not without drawbacks, after graduation. Clarke stated details of technical issues, such £300 to this, making up the however. According to the that ‘in no circumstances’ would as interactions with fees in £3,000 required to cover the government’s calculations, if the reduction in loan exceed Scotland, Wales and Northern EWS DITOR HIL OWARD N E P H cost of the maximum expense the full £2,700 was taken, the £1200. Ireland, and for cross-border BRINGS US UP TO DATE WITH THE of a course. This support would student loan entitlement would The entitlement to the grant students. RECENT TOP UP FEES PROPOSALS. be available to some 30% of need to be reduced by £850 would be means-tested, tapering Letters | page 3 Charity Dinner Dance | page 9 Lord of the Rings | page 14 Interactive | page 20 2 NEWS 22 January 2004 EDITORIAL TEAM 2003-4 Fee Debate Reaches New Heights Editor in Chief With student fees dominating the news over the past few months, Philip Howard brings us Sarah Butterworth comms more news on the week which could shape the future of Higher Education @ussu.co.uk AFTER NEARLY A year of wrangling over the responded to their survey, the majority of minister rightly insists that the abolition of Editor contents of the White Paper, recent events Labour MPs would vote for the government, the upfront fee is a step in the right direction. Chris Ward have stirred up the debate to fever pitch. swinging the vote in the government’s Unfortunately the introduction of variable cs21cw Top-up fees have become front-line favour. Opposition leader Michael Howard top-up fees represents a giant leap in the @surrey.ac.uk politics, with many suggesting that this next has urged Scottish MPs to abstain from wrong direction.” week will be the most decisive of Blair’s voting on the bill. In the poll, however, there The effects of the bill on Surrey may be Deputy Editor leadership - both the Hutton inquiry and the were still more against the bill than for - of wide-ranging. It is well-known that Surrey Neil Christie result of the Higher Education Bill vote will the 44 who intend to vote, 15 were for, 23 will inevitably implement higher fees if ms33nc be released, both pivotal issues. against and 6 undecided. Assuming the 12 they become available. Perhaps some lesser @surrey.ac.uk To this end, the Labour backbench is now Scottish ministers (who weren’t polled) vote noticed news is that the government is expected to rebel in their greatest numbers for the bill, the balance becomes 27 for, 23 making it more diffi cult for some foreign Deputy Editor in recent years in the vote next Tuesday. against, and 6 undecided. Welsh MPs may students to enter the UK to study, which Ben Berryman Despite the opposition for the bill, however, be more inclined to support the bill, as it is one of the areas that Surrey differs most ma91bb there may be some surprise ‘yes’ voters. includes provision for the Welsh Assembly from other universities. Information about @surrey.ac.uk One recent defector was Peter Bradley, to acquire the powers to set its own this has been swamped by the debate on one of the leading Labour rebels, who stated conditions for tuition fees, as the Scottish top-up fees, however, so we may not see Music Editor on Saturday that he would be backing the Parliament has. the changes that have been made until that Matt Badcock Government. According to the Guardian, In order to defeat the bill, all the opposition fi re has abated. The bill does allow for ms01mb Bradley has said that the fi nancial support parties and 82 Labour rebels would be increasing the maintenance loan available @surrey.ac.uk now being offered to students from poor required to vote against the government.