DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Air Quality Around Heathrow

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Air Quality Around Heathrow Our ten-point plan to manage and reduce emissions Improving air quality Aircraft activity Airport traffic Airside vehicles Energy around Heathrow 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Our goal: to reduce ground-based NOx emissions by 5% by 2020. Provide more and Reduce emissions Phase out the better electric- Pool vehicles to Lead the move from aircraft at oldest and vehicle charging Incentivise low- Work with partners to set up Reduce emissions reduce numbers to electric Modernise our The air quality in some areas near Air pollution around Heathrow comes the gate dirtiest aircraft Improve taxiing efficiency points emission vehicles emission zones and standards from our own fleet and emissions vehicles airside heating supply Heathrow – and in many other parts of from the airport and from a variety London and the UK – exceeds the EU’s of other sources: surrounding roads, When their engines are Some aircraft pollute Taxiing produces just over 40% of our ground-based To encourage more Heathrow has invested On our local stretch of the M4, 13% of vehicle- More than 400 companies Pooling of ground- We encourage investment On-site energy turned off, aircraft rely more than others. The aircraft emissions. By working more collaboratively electric vehicles to millions in public transport generated NOx comes from airport-related operate around 8,500 support equipment in electric vehicles by generation, a more health limit for the pollutant, nitrogen industry, heating and background levels on on-board generators, worst are aircraft that with our airline partners, we’ve streamlined the Heathrow, we’ve installed to host the UK’s largest traffic. To tackle the whole problem, we have vehicles airside at could cut the size of this exempting them from efficient district heating dioxide (NO2). of NO2. As a responsible neighbour, known as APUs, for were built before the decision-making process, which helps to reduce taxi 21 charging points in our free travel zone and to work with local authorities, TfL, GLA, the Heathrow. We’re leading element of the airside the maximum age limit network and the we and the bodies responsible for internal power and climate introduction of a series times and emissions. We’ve also been working with car parks. They’re part deliver the Personal Rapid Highways Agency and other stakeholders. the way for the airport fleet by up to 40%. for airside vehicles. We construction of an 11MW Most NO2 in the air comes from the control. To discourage of higher international the air-transport community to develop a code of of the Source London Transport system to community by cutting During 2015, we’ll already have hundreds of biomass plant is helping those other sources of emissions are In 2015, we will work with partners to champion burning of fuels. Combustion creates APU use, we’ve invested emissions standards. In practice that encourages the turning off of one or network. In 2015, we’ll provide electric transport emissions from our own continue our pooling electric charging points, us cut emissions from working to bring local air quality within a joint approach to reducing emissions from road nitrogen oxides (NOx), a mixture of around £20 million on 2014, these aircraft types more engines during taxiing – known as ‘reduced- upgrade the charging for passengers between (Heathrow Airport Ltd) trials and, by the end of and nearly all of our 800 Heathrow’s energy use. traffic in the Heathrow area and work with TfL, EU and UK Government limits. equipment to supply accounted for just over engine taxiing’. infrastructure in our short- the business car parks fleet of 220 vehicles – the year, put a contract baggage tugs are electric. We’ll continue to cut NO (nitrogen oxide) and NO2. Some GLA, and local key stakeholders to help formulate a pre-conditioned air and 6% of Heathrow flights. stay car parks and look for and Terminal 5. Since and monitoring progress out to tender for a emissions by modernising NO then reacts with oxygen in the At the airport, we and our partners During 2015, we’ll do more by: Regional Strategy for Air Quality to include a roadmap In 2015, we’ll increase electrical power to aircraft the best way to introduce 2002, we’ve been home once a month. During single supplier of pooled our heating infrastructure. atmosphere to form more NO . are working to improve air quality To encourage airlines to for compliance with NO2 limit values by 2020. our investment in 2 at many gates. We’ve also 1. Working with NATS to record the frequency points for our taxi feeder, to one of the biggest 2015, we’ll review our equipment. Wherever We’ll replace old fly cleaner aircraft, we airside electric-charging by reducing emissions from aircraft, set limits on the use of and effectiveness of reduced-engine taxiing long-stay passenger and employee car share Measures we’ll investigate include: entire fleet to help us practical, we’ll specify equipment and move already link our landing infrastructure. Through vehicles and buildings. Our goal is to APUs by aircraft standing colleague car parks. schemes in Europe. plan ahead; our goal for that pooled equipment towards a more efficient fees to an aircraft’s NOx the Heathrow Clean at gates offering ground- 2. Increasing the frequency 1. Establishing emissions standards for 2020 is that every car should be electric. network in which heating cut ground-based emissions of NOx emissions. In 2015, we’ve We want to encourage Vehicles Partnership, we’ll based air and power. of reduced-engine taxiing Heathrow buses and coaches aligned or small van we own and energy are shared. by 5% by 2020 (from 2009 levels). proposed to nearly double a wider range of low- By the end of the year, all run trials to generate with London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone or lease will be electric To help achieve this, we our NOx landing fees 3. Upgrading taxiways to maximise efficiency emissions vehicles at airside vehicles will carry data on the costs and Increases to our biomass 2. Working with bus and coach operators or a plug-in hybrid. Combustion creates NOx – N Nitrogen will encourage airlines and will work at a senior 4. Investigating other approaches such Heathrow. So we’ll tracking devices to give operational needs of a capacity are already in O N O NO to increase the number of hybrid buses a mixture of NO and NO2 O Oxygen 2 to regularly use ground- level with our airline as hybrid-electric aircraft tugs that tow develop incentive the airport community range of electric vehicles the pipeline. Until that In the air, nitrogen oxide (NO) reacts with oxygen based air and power partners to encourage aircraft to the runway while their engines schemes for low or zero- 3. Seeing whether we can set up a geofence the data it needs to and charging facilities. happens we’ll wind N O NO to create more nitrogen dioxide (NO2) with a target to increase an earlier phase-out of are off. emission buses, coaches around Heathrow that forces hybrid vehicles reduce vehicle numbers, We’ll also look at how down operations in usage by 15% in 2015, older aircraft. We’ll work and taxis. The sort of to operate in electric-only mode. emissions and costs. We’ll we can favour cleaner one of our oldest boiler investigate ways to expand to add the international measures we’re looking also start planning for vehicles by adapting houses and replace it with and upgrade our supplies NOx standards to our at include lower fees the introduction by 2025 the pricing structure for low-NOx boilers. And and publish an investment quarterly Fly Quiet league for better performing of an airside emissions airside vehicle passes, we’ll upgrade Terminal Responsible Heathrow 2020 is our plan to support plan by the end of the table to create a single vehicles and priority to zone aligned with the and how we can contract 5 boilers with the same the UK and local economies, reduce Heathrow’s year. We’ll also ensure comparison table for hybrid or electric taxis standards of London’s and provide charging for low-NOx technology. environmental impacts and look after passengers and that airlines adhere to airline performance on in our taxi feeder park. Ultra Low Emission Zone. electric airside buses. people. It’s a step towards achieving our ambition to be the limits we’ve set on noise and emissions. We’ll also review our APU use. By comparing colleague incentive one of the most responsible airports in the world. our performance and schemes to encourage standards against low or zero-emission cars other leading airports, for staff commuting. we’ll work to be among the best. Air quality monitoring sites around For exact locations of the monitoring stations see www.heathrowairwatch.org.uk/latest Heathrow emissions in context Non-airport related emissions % of total NOx Airport related emissions % of total NOx Heathrow 2013 performance Heathrow is just one of many local sources of NOx emissions. Although Measured as 60 NO mg/m3 the airport is a significant contributor of NOx, it’s by no means the largest. 2 Heathrow’s blueprint Most NOx in the Heathrow locality comes from general road traffic. 16% 50 Railways and industry also generate NOx. M25 48% M4 6% 84% 94% for reducing emissions 40 EU limit value 9% 22% 13% 23% 11% 15% 13% 31% Our ten-point plan to reduce 91% 30% 87% 89% Traffic not aircraft Working together 87% 78% 85% 30 77% Heathrow’s emissions in 2015 Data from the Hillingdon monitoring station shows to improve air quality 52% 69% that non-airport traffic generates more than twice as 70% 20 much NOx as all airport sources combined.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London Councils Housing Forum Executive Meeting
    London Councils’ Transport & Environment Committee Chair’s Report Item no: 07 Report by: Katharina Winbeck Job title: Head of Transport and Environment Date: 19 March 2015 Contact Officer: Katharina Winbeck Telephone: 020 7934 9945 Email: [email protected] Summary This report updates Members on transport and environment policy since the last TEC meeting on 11 December 2014 and provides a forward look until the next TEC meeting on 11 June 2015. Recommendations Members to note this report. Update included in this report: Portfolio holder meeting with Chair of London Councils Transport Meeting between TEC and TfL Commissioner A new freight strategy for London Office of Low Emission Vehicles ‘Go Ultra Low City scheme’ joint bid with GLA and TfL Crossrail 2 Source London Update Ultra Low Emission Zone consultation response Environment Bellwin scheme consultation response Spitting byelaw Thames Regional Flood and Coastal Committee (TRFCC) Green Infrastructure Task Force Forward Look Chair’s Report London Councils’ TEC – 19 March 2015 Agenda Item 7, Page 1 Introduction 1. This report updates Members on London Councils’ work on transport and environment policy since the last TEC meeting on 11 December 2014 and provides a forward look until 18 June 2015. Portfolio holder briefing with Chair of London Councils 2. I met with Mayor Jules Pipe and London Councils officers to discuss the priorities for the year 2015/16. We agreed to focus our efforts on two areas; • Work with Government and TfL to ensure that current funding levels remain or are improved • Explore ways in which the borough contribution can be strengthened and improved through further collaboration With the key aims being; • Achieving a better deal on utility bills for both residents and boroughs to reduce fuel poverty in the Capital and achieve much needed savings.
    [Show full text]
  • Demand Side Policy – Vehicle Charging Schemes in London
    Demand Side Policy – Vehicle charging schemes in London Simon Roberts – Principal City Planner, Transport for London Background London and the Role of the Mayor and TfL • Population – 8.7 million • Size – 1572 km2 • 33 Local Authorities • Elected Mayor with strategic powers over all of Greater London • TfL are the integrated transport authority responsible for delivering the Mayor's strategy and commitments on transport. • On the roads, we regulate taxis and the private hire trade, run the Congestion Charging and Low Emission Zone (LEZ) schemes, manage the city’s 580km red route network, operate all of the Capital’s 6,300 traffic signals • Our operational responsibilities include London Underground, London Buses, Docklands Light Railway, London Overground, TfL Rail, London Trams, London River Services, London Dial-a-Ride, Victoria Coach Station, Santander Cycles and the Emirates Air Line. 3 Timeline of charging schemes in London – February 2003 Congestion Charge Launched – 2008 Low Emission Zone launched – 2012 Low Emission Zone tightened – March 2015 - Ultra Low Emission Zone in central confirmed – May 2016 - Sadiq Khan elected Mayor – October 2017 – T-Charge Launched – November 2017 – ULEZ start date brought forward to April 2019 – December 2017 – Consultation on future expansion of ULEZ and tighter LEZ 4 Congestion Charging Zone 6 Why was Congestion Charging necessary? • Despite 85% public transport usage, vehicular traffic major problem • 185,000 cars entered central London each day • Central London most congested area in UK; traffic speeds <9mph • Congestion persisted throughout the day • Congestion cost London an estimated £4 billion • To address this, an area-based charging scheme was chosen for central London (eligible motorists pay once per day) • Objectives of scheme: - Reduce traffic and traffic congestion - Raise revenue to re-invest in transport.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ultra Low Emission Capital
    London: The Ultra Low Emission Capital Go Ultra Low City Scheme Bid 1 Copyright Greater London Authority October 2015 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 3 Contents London’s Go Ultra Low City Scheme Bid 6 Part 2: DELIVERING THE BID Part 1: LONDON’S BID Delivery milestones 74 1.0 Why London? Unlocking the UK’s potential by investing in the capital 11 How London fulfils OLEV’s criteria 76 1.1 Changing infrastructure in residential areas 23 Costs 78 1.2 Changing infrastructure for car clubs 33 Bid partners 84 1.3 Charging infrastructure for commercial fleets 41 State aid 86 1.4 Neighbourhoods of the Future 55 Conclusion 88 PART ONE 5 OVERVIEW 2050. In doing so, we will deliver air quality benefits and will be able to track In July, London set out its vision to progress through our comprehensive become an ultra low emission vehicle emissions monitoring networks and capital. London is bidding for £20 data reporting. million in funding from the Office for Low Emission Vehicles (OLEV) Go Ultra Low London’s bid will overcome the most City Scheme to make this vision a reality. profound barrier to ULEV uptake; the availability of charging infrastructure. This bid builds on the progress made The new delivery partnership for by London’s innovative policies such residential charging addresses barriers as the Congestion Charge and Low for private users, primarily the lack Emission Zone and local councils’ work of off-street parking and related to incentivise cleaner vehicles through complexity of charging.
    [Show full text]
  • Incentivising Low-Carbon Travel Lessons from a Wide Range of Reward and Platform Schemes
    Incentivising low-carbon travel Lessons from a wide range of reward and platform schemes Rosanna Hine1, Paloma Ortega Arriaga1, Ajay Gambhir1, Lina Fedirko 2, Heleen van Soest3 Final report (June 2020) [Image: Si-Gal] 1 Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, UK 2 ClimateWorks Foundation, USA 3 PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (please note, Heleen van Soest’s contribution to this report is in a personal rather than institutional capacity) 1 1. Introduction To achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions to deliver the Paris Agreement’s goals, all sectors must undergo deep emissions reductions. Approximately one-quarter of global CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion come from the transport sector (IEA, 2019). Transport will be challenging to fully decarbonise in the coming decades, owing to the difficulty in substituting low- for high-carbon fuels in freight, aviation and shipping, as well as infrastructural inertia (Grubler, A et al, 2018). A relatively underexplored opportunity to reduce emissions in the transport sector is through behavioural and societal changes, specifically by encouraging and incentivising lower-carbon travel choices and through disincentivising higher-carbon choices. A variety of studies have considered longer-term behaviour changes in sectors including transport, to achieve ambitious climate targets (Grubler, A et al, 2018), (van Vuuren, D.P et al, 2018), (T.A. Napp et al, 2019) but such behaviour change scenarios are not yet mainstream in the climate change mitigation literature. The emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic and the imposition of lockdowns across the world have given rise to significant changes in the transport sector, with a large share of personal and business travel replaced by online interactions and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Taming Traffic
    Taming Traffic STRATEGIES TO REDUCE DRIVING AND PRIORITIZE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION IN CITIES CONTENTS AUTHORS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AUTHOR Dana Yanocha FOREWORD 3 CONTRIBUTORS Tara Eisenberg 1. INTRODUCTION Jacob Mason Fee-based and non-fee-based strategies 9 Heather Thompson Designing equitable solutions 12 Background information, data, and internal review was provided by ITDP regional office staff: Etsa Amanda, ITDP Indonesia 2. MENU OF OPTIONS: TRAFFIC REDUCTION STRATEGIES Carolynn Johnson, ITDP US Parking pricing 16 Christopher Kost, ITDP Africa Clarisse Linke, ITDP Brazil Emissions pricing 22 Edgar Mejia, ITDP US Congestion pricing 27 Alphonse Nkurunziza, ITDP Africa Gonzalo Peon Carballo, ITDP Mexico Reallocating road space for people 32 Vaishali Singh, ITDP India Clara Vadillo, ITDP Mexico Limited traffic zones 38 Xianyuan Zhu, ITDP China 3. STRATEGY EVALUATION ITDP would also like to acknowledge the following experts who generously provided their 3.1 Ability to achieve traffic reduction targets time for informational interviews during the linked to livability 41 scoping phase and/or to review the draft report: Daniel Firth, TransLink Vancouver 3.2 Ability to further sustainable transport goals 46 Kate Laing, C40 Shomik Mehndiratta, World Bank 3.3 Potential for effective implementation in Carlos Pardo, NUMO limited capacity contexts 55 Michael Replogle Carolina Tohá Rachel Weinberger, Weinberger & Associates Lloyd Wright, Asian Development Bank 4. KEY TAKEAWAYS 65 APPENDIX A Design and Implementation Resources 69 APPENDIX B Definitions of 3.3 Evaluation Criteria 71 cover photo: Complete Street Eje 3 Oriente, Ing. Eduardo Molina, Ciudad de México source: Héctor Ríos, ITDP México 2 FOREWORD Before the COVID-19 pandemic, congestion posed a major challenge to cities large and small, contributing to climate change, air and noise pollution as well as other negative outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: List of Stakeholders That Responded to the ULEZ Consultation
    Appendix B (2) Appendix A: List of stakeholders that responded to the ULEZ consultation Air Quality Brentford Coulsdon & Purley Road User Alliance of British Drivers Forum Arriva Cross River Partnership Balfour Beatty Disabled Motoring UK Bambos Charalambous MP Federation of British Historic Barking and Dagenham and Vehicle Clubs Havering Green Party Federation of Small Businesses Barnet Green Party Forest Hill Society Better Streets for Enfield Freight Transport Association Bloomsbury Air Friends of the Earth Brentford Chamber of Gipsy Hill Green Party Commerce Greenpeace Brentford Community Council Greenwich Conservatives Brewery Logistics Group Heart of London Business British Heart Foundation Alliance British Lung Foundation Herne Hill Green Party British Motorcyclists Federation Hertfordshire County Council British Vehicle Rental and Hounslow and Brentford Leasing Association (BVRLA) Friends of the Earth Builders Merchants Federation Islington Green Party Campaign for Better Transport Joanne McCartney AM Campaign for Better Transport John Lewis Partnership (London Group) Kingston Environment Forum Campaign to Protect Rural Lambeth for a Cool Planet England Lambeth Green Party Caroline Pidgeon AM LEVC Caroline Russell AM Lewisham Cyclists Chartered Institute of Lewisham Liberal Democrats Environmental Health Licensed Taxi Drivers' Chiswick Liberal Democrats Association (LTDA) Church of England (Diocese of Living Streets Chelmsford) London Assembly Environment City of London Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Understanding Between Transport for London and the London Ambulance Service
    Memorandum of Understanding between Transport for London and The London Ambulance Service This memorandum of understanding is made between: Transport for London (“TfL”) of 55 Broadway London SW1H 0BD and The London Ambulance Service (“LAS”) of 220 Waterloo Road London SE1 8SD on: Purpose This memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) sets out the understanding between TfL and the LAS on how the LAS will work towards: (1) achieving compliance with the Ultra Low Emission Zone vehicle emissions standards requirements to be brought into force by the Mayor of London and TfL; and (2) creating a zero emission fleet, to minimise harmful effects on air quality from the LAS’s road vehicle operations. The Mayor of London supports the positions of the parties as set out in this MOU. Greater London’s Low Emission Zone (“LEZ”) and the Ultra Low Emission Zone (“ULEZ”) are both defined in the Greater London Low Emission Zone Charging Scheme (“the Charging Scheme”)1. TfL operates the LEZ; it is responsible for setting up and operating the ULEZ. TfL will operate the ULEZ from 8 April 2019, initially in the area of central London as defined in the Charging Scheme by reference to the London Congestion Charging Zone (“CCZ”). Under section 7 of the Transport for London Act 2008, TfL may suspend or partially suspend the operation of the Charging Scheme for such period or periods as it thinks fit where it appears to TfL to be desirable or expedient so to do. TfL will thus be able to waive ULEZ Daily Charges that a vehicle that does not comply with ULEZ emissions standards requirements would otherwise be obliged to pay.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on International Practices for Low Emission Zone and Congestion Charging
    WORKING PAPER STUDY ON INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES FOR LOW EMISSION ZONE AND CONGESTION CHARGING YING WANG, SU SONG, SHIYONG QIU, LU LU, YILIN MA, XIAOYI LI, AND YING HU EXECUTIVE SUMMARY China’s rapid urbanization and motorization have CONTENTS caused severe air pollution and traffic congestion in the Executive summary........................................................... 1 country, which in turn has led to a sharp increase in social costs. In Beijing, vehicles account for 31.1 percent, Introduction...................................................................... 5 33 percent, and 50 percent of total emissions of fine Research methodology and framework............................. 6 particles (or particulate matter 2.5, PM2.5), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and nitrogen oxides (NOx), London case study............................................................ 8 respectively, making vehicles the leading pollution source Singapore case study...................................................... 27 in the city. Growing traffic congestion also imposes high Stockholm case study..................................................... 50 socioeconomic costs. In September 2013, Beijing released the Beijing Clean Air Action Plan 2013–2017, and the Conclusions................................................................... 62 Work Plan for Vehicle Emissions Control 2013–2017, Endnote.......................................................................... 67 in an important effort to tackle transport emissions References.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Ulev-Delivery-Plan
    An Ultra Low Emission Vehicle Delivery Plan for London Cleaner vehicles for a cleaner city July 2015 About Transport for London We are the integrated transport authority for London. Our purpose is to keep London working and growing and to make life in the Capital better. We reinvest all our income to run and improve London’s transport services. Our operational responsibilities include London Underground, London Buses, Docklands Light Railway, London Overground, TfL Rail, London Trams, London River Services, London Dial-a-Ride, Victoria Coach Station, Santander Cycles and the Emirates Air Line. On the roads, we regulate taxis and the private hire vehicle (PHV) trade, run the Congestion Charging scheme, manage the city’s 580km red route network, operate the Capital’s 6,200 traffic signals and work to ensure a safe environment for all road users. We are delivering one of the world’s largest programmes of transport capital investment, which is building Crossrail, modernising Tube services and stations, improving the road network and making the roads safer, especially for more vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians and cyclists. We are a pioneer in integrated ticketing and providing information to help people move around London. Oyster is the world’s most popular smartcard, and contactless payment is making travel ever more convenient. Real-time travel information is provided by us directly and through third parties, who use the data TfL makes openly and freely available to power apps and other services. Improving and expanding transport in London is central to driving economic growth, jobs and housing across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    31st Mayor’s Report to the Assembly Mayor’s Question Time – 16th May 2019 This is my thirty-first Mayor’s Report to the Assembly, fulfilling my duty under Section 45 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999. It covers the period from 8th March – 2nd May 2019. Executive summary Standing together against hatred and extremism The world has again been shocked and disgusted by appalling terrorist attacks in Sri Lanka and New Zealand. London stands in solidarity with the victims of these atrocities and their families as they come to terms with the shock and grief of their loss. That the attacks targeted Christians and Muslims in their places of worship reflects the ruthless determination of both Islamist and far-right extremists to strike at the things we hold most dear, to sow hatred and to divide communities. I have written to the Government to urge them to ensure that security at all places of worship is properly funded. However, it is only by tackling the roots of extremism and creating stronger, more integrated communities that we can find a long-term solution. In London, my Countering Violent Extremism programme is working across London’s communities as it produces its final report, which is due to be published later this year. I will keep Assembly Members updated as this important work continues. 20,000 Londoners set to benefit from £57 million investment Ensuring Londoners have the skills and training to thrive in our dynamic economy is crucial for the future of our city. On 2 May, my Skills for Londoners Capital Fund has committed over £57 million in helping everyone make the most of London’s opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfl Commissioner's Report
    Commissioner’s Report 18 March 2020 About Transport for London (TfL) Part of the Greater London Authority We are moving ahead with many of (GLA) family led by Mayor of London Sadiq London’s most significant infrastructure Khan, we are the integrated transport projects, using transport to unlock growth. authority responsible for delivering the We are working with partners on major Mayor’s aims for transport. projects like Crossrail 2 and the Bakerloo Line Extension that will deliver the new We have a key role in shaping what life is homes and jobs London and the UK need. like in London, helping to realise the We are in the final phases of completing Mayor’s vision for a ‘City for All the Elizabeth line which, when open, will Londoners’. We are committed to creating add 10 per cent to central London’s rail a fairer, greener, healthier and more capacity. prosperous city. The Mayor’s Transport Strategy sets a target for 80 per cent of all Supporting the delivery of high-density, journeys to be made on foot, by cycle or mixed-use developments that are planned using public transport by 2041. To make around active and sustainable travel will this a reality, we prioritise health and the ensure that London’s growth is good quality of people’s experience in growth. We also use our own land to everything we do. provide thousands of new affordable homes and our own supply chain creates We manage the city’s red route strategic tens of thousands of jobs and roads and, through collaboration with the apprenticeships across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • CAL 294 ULEZ HIA Final ULEZ Consultation Reduced Size
    Ultra Low Emission Zone Integrated Impact Assessment Health Impact Assessment October 2014 In association with: Ben Cave Associates and Ricardo-AEA Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Purpose of this report 1 1.3 Scope of the HIA 1 1.4 Structure of this report 2 2 Background 3 3 Details of the Proposed ULEZ 4 3.1 Overview 4 3.2 ULEZ study area 5 4 Regulatory Context 7 4.1 Introduction 7 4.2 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 7 4.3 The London Plan 7 4.4 The Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS) 7 4.5 The Mayor’s Air Quality Strategy (MAQS) 7 4.6 Mayor’s London Health Inequalities Strategy 7 4.7 Other strategies and policies relevant to health and wellbeing 7 5 Method 9 5.1 Introduction 9 5.2 Defining health and wellbeing 9 5.3 Defining HIA 10 5.4 Approach 10 5.5 Scoping methodology 11 5.6 London Low Emission Zone (LEZ) HIA 14 6 Baseline Data and Local Health Conditions 15 6.1 Introduction 15 6.2 Population 15 6.3 Age profile 16 6.4 Employment 17 6.5 Transport 17 6.6 Crime 18 6.7 General health of the community 18 7 Assessment of Impacts 20 7.1 Introduction 20 8 Assessment of Impacts: Air Quality 21 8.1 Introduction 21 8.2 Health pathway 21 8.3 Receptors 22 8.4 Impact assessment 22 8.5 Conclusion 26 8.6 Recommendations 27 9 Assessment of Impacts: Noise & Neighbourhood Amenity 28 9.1 Introduction 28 9.2 Health pathway 28 9.3 Receptors 28 9.4 Impact assessment 28 9.5 Recommendations 29 10 Assessment of Impacts: Active Travel 31 10.1 Introduction 31 10.2 Health pathway 31 10.3 Receptors 32 10.4 Impact assessment 32 10.5 Recommendations
    [Show full text]