DOCSLIB.ORG

The Flags Dispute: Anatomy of a Protest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Flags Dispute: Anatomy of a Protest See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274691563 The Flags Dispute: Anatomy of a Protest Book · December 2014 CITATIONS READS 5 82 6 authors, including: Dominic Bryan Katy Hayward Queen's University Belfast Queen's University Belfast 33 PUBLICATIONS 94 CITATIONS 51 PUBLICATIONS 137 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Peter Shirlow University of Liverpool 109 PUBLICATIONS 1,433 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Brexit and the Border View project devolution View project All content following this page was uploaded by Dominic Bryan on 08 April 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Flag Dispute: Anatomy of a Protest Full Report Paul Nolan Dominic Bryan Clare Dwyer Katy Hayward Katy Radford & Peter Shirlow December 2014 Supported by the Community Relations Council & the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Ireland) Published by Queen’s University Belfast ISBN 9781909131248 Cover image: © Pacemaker Press. 3 Acknowledgements The authors of this report are extremely grateful to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Community Relations Council for funding this research project and its publication. A huge debt of gratitude is also due to those who gave their time to be interviewed, and for the honesty and candour with which they related their experiences - these were often quite emotive experiences. The Institute for Conflict Research (ICR) was commissioned to undertake the interviews presented within this report. These interviews were conducted with great care and skill with ICR capturing many voices which we hope have been represented fairly and accurately within this publication. Finally, warm recognition must be given to those who transcribed the recordings, and the care they took with this painstaking task. 4 CONTENTS List of Tables, Figures and illustrations ............................................................. 7 Glossary ........................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 9 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 14 1.1 Why we wrote this report ............................................................................................................ 14 1.2 How we set about the task ............................................................................................................. 15 2. WHY ARE FLAGS IMPORTANT? .................................................................... 18 2.1 Symbolic contest in Ireland and Northern Ireland ......................................................................... 18 2.2 Symbolic contestation after the Agreement .................................................................................. 21 2.3 Post-Agreement divergent practice on flying the Union flag......................................................... 23 2.4 The handling of the flag issue in local councils .............................................................................. 25 2.5 The symbolic and cultural environment of Belfast City Council .................................................... 26 3. HOW EVENTS UNFOLDED ............................................................................ 29 3.1 The build-up to the vote: inside City Hall ....................................................................................... 29 3.2 The build-up to the vote: outside City Hall .................................................................................... 35 3.3 The night of the vote ...................................................................................................................... 38 3.4 The first week of the protest .......................................................................................................... 42 3.5 The protest escalates ..................................................................................................................... 44 3.6 Political reactions: support, alarm and ridicule ............................................................................. 48 3.7 Efforts to conclude the protest ...................................................................................................... 51 3.8 The decline of the protest .............................................................................................................. 58 4. SHIFTS IN THE PUBLIC MOOD ...................................................................... 61 4.1 The evidence from polling .............................................................................................................. 61 4.2 The non-protesting Protestants ..................................................................................................... 64 4.3 Attitudes within nationalism and the centre ground ..................................................................... 66 4.4 The response in the media and on social media ............................................................................ 68 4.5 The role of civil society ................................................................................................................... 73 5 5. WHO ORGANISED THE PROTESTS? .............................................................. 76 5.1 Political manipulation ..................................................................................................................... 76 5.2 The use of social media in organising protests .............................................................................. 77 5.3 A ‘people’s protest?’ ...................................................................................................................... 80 5.4 The role of the paramilitaries ......................................................................................................... 81 5.5 The ‘flag provocateurs’ ................................................................................................................... 85 6. WHAT CAUSED THE PROTESTS? ................................................................... 88 6.1 Social drivers: the impact of gender and generational differences ............................................... 88 6.2 Emotive drivers: the effects of alienation ...................................................................................... 93 6.3 Ideological drivers: arising from opposition to the Agreement ..................................................... 95 6.4 Cultural drivers: a defensive celebration of culture ....................................................................... 98 6.5 Political drivers: arising from distrust of political institutions ..................................................... 101 6.6 Economic drivers: arising from relative deprivation .................................................................... 104 6.7 What distinguished the flag protests? ......................................................................................... 106 7. POLICING THE PROTESTS ........................................................................... 108 7.1 Loyalist criticisms of policing ........................................................................................................ 109 7.2 Nationalist criticisms of policing................................................................................................... 111 7.3 The legal challenge ....................................................................................................................... 112 7.4 Monitoring the Police: the views of the independent bodies ..................................................... 116 7. 5 Overall assessment of the policing response .............................................................................. 119 7.6 Criminal justice ........................................................................................................................... 121 8. THE LEGACY OF THE FLAG PROTEST ........................................................... 128 8.1 The impact on politics .................................................................................................................. 128 8.2 The impact on community relations ............................................................................................ 131 8.3 Other research studies on the protest ......................................................................................... 137 8.4 Perspectives from community relations organisations ................................................................ 138 8.5 The future of reconciliation work ............................................................................................... 141 9. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 144 6 LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND ILLUSTRATIONS Table 1. Results of elections to Belfast City Council, 2001 and 2011. ........................................... 29 Table 2. Results of staff survey on policy on flying a flag on public buildings in BCC. ................... 32 Illustration 1. Image of the leaflet distributed in east Belfast prior to the council vote. .............. 37 Illustration 2. Geographical spread of the protests. .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John F. Morrison Phd Thesis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository 'THE AFFIRMATION OF BEHAN?' AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE POLITICISATION PROCESS OF THE PROVISIONAL IRISH REPUBLICAN MOVEMENT THROUGH AN ORGANISATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SPLITS FROM 1969 TO 1997 John F. Morrison A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2010 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3158 This item is protected by original copyright ‘The Affirmation of Behan?’ An Understanding of the Politicisation Process of the Provisional Irish Republican Movement Through an Organisational Analysis of Splits from 1969 to 1997. John F. Morrison School of International Relations Ph.D. 2010 SUBMISSION OF PHD AND MPHIL THESES REQUIRED DECLARATIONS 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, John F. Morrison, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 82,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2005 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in May, 2007; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2005 and 2010. Date 25-Aug-10 Signature of candidate 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Counter-Aesthetics of Republican Prison Writing
    Notes Chapter One Introduction: Taoibh Amuigh agus Faoi Ghlas: The Counter-aesthetics of Republican Prison Writing 1. Gerry Adams, “The Fire,” Cage Eleven (Dingle: Brandon, 1990) 37. 2. Ibid., 46. 3. Pat Magee, Gangsters or Guerillas? (Belfast: Beyond the Pale, 2001) v. 4. David Pierce, ed., Introduction, Irish Writing in the Twentieth Century: A Reader (Cork: Cork University Press, 2000) xl. 5. Ibid. 6. Shiela Roberts, “South African Prison Literature,” Ariel 16.2 (Apr. 1985): 61. 7. Michel Foucault, “Power and Strategies,” Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, ed. Colin Gordon (New York: Pantheon, 1980) 141–2. 8. In “The Eye of Power,” for instance, Foucault argues, “The tendency of Bentham’s thought [in designing prisons such as the famed Panopticon] is archaic in the importance it gives to the gaze.” In Power/ Knowledge 160. 9. Breyten Breytenbach, The True Confessions of an Albino Terrorist (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1983) 147. 10. Ioan Davies, Writers in Prison (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990) 4. 11. Ibid. 12. William Wordsworth, “Preface to Lyrical Ballads,” The Norton Anthology of English Literature vol. 2A, 7th edition, ed. M. H. Abrams et al. (New York: W. W. Norton, 2000) 250. 13. Gerry Adams, “Inside Story,” Republican News 16 Aug. 1975: 6. 14. Gerry Adams, “Cage Eleven,” Cage Eleven (Dingle: Brandon, 1990) 20. 15. Wordsworth, “Preface” 249. 16. Ibid., 250. 17. Ibid. 18. Terry Eagleton, The Ideology of the Aesthetic (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990) 27. 19. W. B. Yeats, Essays and Introductions (New York: Macmillan, 1961) 521–2. 20. Bobby Sands, One Day in My Life (Dublin and Cork: Mercier, 1983) 98.
    [Show full text]
  • New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2020 New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts Laura K. Donohue Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2248 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3825722 Laura K. Donohue, New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts, in The Offences Against the State Act 1939 at 80: A Model Counter-Terrorism Act? 163 (Mark Coen ed., Oxford: Hart Publishing 2021). This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, European Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the National Security Law Commons New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts Laura K. Donohue1 Introduction Social media has become an integral part of modern human interaction: as of October 2019, Facebook reported 2.414 billion active users worldwide.2 YouTube, WhatsApp, and Instagram were not far behind, with 2 billion, 1.6 billion, and 1 billion users respectively.3 In Ireland, 3.2 million people (66% of the population) use social media for an average of nearly two hours per day.4 By 2022, the number of domestic Facebook users is expected to reach 2.92 million.5 Forty-one percent of the population uses Instagram (65% daily); 30% uses Twitter (40% daily), and another 30% uses LinkedIn.6 With social media most prevalent amongst the younger generations, these numbers will only rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Leftline Indesign.Indd
    LEFTLINE Radical analysis from the Irish Socialist Network www.irishsocialist.net hoping his listeners will take responsible, or we turn in on fright at the prospect of them ourselves and find someone LOOKING AFTER all descending upon us like else to blame. From the OUR OWN avian-flu-ridden turkeys. bosses’ point of view, racism The truth is a lot less is extremely handy as a ready-made scapegoat. When people stop believing dramatic, of course. Ireland in socialism, it often turns is finally catching up with What Rabbitte has achieved out that they don’t just the rest of the world, with is to tip the scales a bit believe in nothing: they’ll about 10% of our population further against a class believe in anything. Whether now coming from abroad. response and in favour Pat Rabbitte ever believed in Far from robbing the poor of a racist response. He socialism in any real sense old Irish of the fruits of has turned attention away is a question we can leave to the Celtic Tiger, the vast from the conflict of interest the boys down at forensics, majority of immigrant between classes, and towards but he’s certainly prepared workers are taking up jobs an imagined conflict of to pin his tail to any donkey that Irish people now find races. He has brought these days. too unpleasant or badly-paid. into respectable discourse And the few who have beaten the notion that a group of Having sold what was left Irish people to a job against workers are the problem that of the Labour Party’s soul the odds deserve it, and are needs controlling, rather to Enda Kenny — cheaply, doing no more than millions than the capitalist class and because damaged goods of Irish people have done in its behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting and Discounting for the International Contacts of the Provisional Irish Republican Army by Michael Mckinley
    Conflict Quarterly Of "Alien Influences": Accounting and Discounting for the International Contacts of the Provisional Irish Republican Army by Michael McKinley NATURE OF INTERNATIONAL CONTACTS In a world where nation states are unanimous in their disavowal of terrorism — even if they are incapable of unanimously agreeing on a defini­ tion of what it is they are disavowing — and in a Western Europe which regards separatist and irredentist claims as anathema, mere is a natural ten­ dency for those who are so excluded to make common cause where they might Disparate as these groups are, they really have only themselves to meet as equals; though they might wish to be nation states or represent nation states in the fullness of time, they exist until then as interlopers in the relations between states: seldom invited and then almost always disappointed by their reception. It is a world with which the Provisional Irish Republican Army and its more political expression, Sinn Fein, are entirely familiar and also one in which, given their history, political complexion, strategy and objectives, it would be extraordinarily strange for them not to have a wide range of inter­ national contacts. But potent as the reflex of commonality by exclusion is, it does not completely determine these linkages because to argue this is to argue on the basis of default rather than purpose. For the Provisionals there is a utility not only of making such contacts but also in formalizing them where possible within the movements' organizational structure. Thus, in 1976 the Sinn Fein Ard Fheis moved to establish, under the directorship of Risteard Behal, a Foreign Affairs Bureau, with Behal as its first "sort of roving Euro­ pean ambassador .
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellaneous Notes on Republicanism and Socialism in Cork City, 1954–69
    MISCELLANEOUS NOTES ON REPUBLICANISM AND SOCIALISM IN CORK CITY, 1954–69 By Jim Lane Note: What follows deals almost entirely with internal divisions within Cork republicanism and is not meant as a comprehensive outline of republican and left-wing activities in the city during the period covered. Moreover, these notes were put together following specific queries from historical researchers and, hence, the focus at times is on matters that they raised. 1954 In 1954, at the age of 16 years, I joined the following branches of the Republican Movement: Sinn Féin, the Irish Republican Army and the Cork Volunteers’Pipe Band. The most immediate influence on my joining was the discovery that fellow Corkmen were being given the opportunity of engag- ing with British Forces in an effort to drive them out of occupied Ireland. This awareness developed when three Cork IRA volunteers were arrested in the North following a failed raid on a British mil- itary barracks; their arrest and imprisonment for 10 years was not a deterrent in any way. My think- ing on armed struggle at that time was informed by much reading on the events of the Tan and Civil Wars. I had been influenced also, a few years earlier, by the campaigning of the Anti-Partition League. Once in the IRA, our initial training was a three-month republican educational course, which was given by Tomas Óg MacCurtain, son of the Lord Mayor of Cork, Tomas MacCurtain, who was murdered by British forces at his home in 1920. This course was followed by arms and explosives training.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix List of Interviews*
    Appendix List of Interviews* Name Date Personal Interview No. 1 29 August 2000 Personal Interview No. 2 12 September 2000 Personal Interview No. 3 18 September 2000 Personal Interview No. 4 6 October 2000 Personal Interview No. 5 16 October 2000 Personal Interview No. 6 17 October 2000 Personal Interview No. 7 18 October 2000 Personal Interview No. 8: Oonagh Marron (A) 17 October 2000 Personal Interview No. 9: Oonagh Marron (B) 23 October 2000 Personal Interview No. 10: Helena Schlindwein 28 October 2000 Personal Interview No. 11 30 October 2000 Personal Interview No. 12 1 November 2000 Personal Interview No. 13 1 November 2000 Personal Interview No. 14: Claire Hackett 7 November 2000 Personal Interview No. 15: Meta Auden 15 November 2000 Personal Interview No. 16 1 June 2000 Personal Interview Maggie Feeley 30 August 2005 Personal Interview No. 18 4 August 2009 Personal Interview No. 19: Marie Mulholland 27 August 2009 Personal Interview No. 20 3 February 2010 Personal Interview No. 21A (joint interview) 23 February 2010 Personal Interview No. 21B (joint interview) 23 February 2010 * Locations are omitted from this list so as to preserve the identity of the respondents. 203 Notes 1 Introduction: Rethinking Women and Nationalism 1 . I will return to this argument in a subsequent section dedicated to women’s victimisation as ‘women as reproducers’ of the nation. See also, Beverly Allen, Rape Warfare: The Hidden Genocide in Bosnia-Herzegovina (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1996); Alexandra Stiglmayer, (ed.), Mass Rape: The War Against Women in Bosnia- Herzegovina (Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 1994); Carolyn Nordstrom, Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival (Berkeley: University of California, 1995); Jill Benderly, ‘Rape, feminism, and nationalism in the war in Yugoslav successor states’ in Lois West, ed., Feminist Nationalism (London and New Tork: Routledge, 1997); Cynthia Enloe, ‘When soldiers rape’ in Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives (Berkeley: University of California, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Engagement: Irish Republicanism, Memory Politics
    Critical Engagement Critical Engagement Irish republicanism, memory politics and policing Kevin Hearty LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY PRESS First published 2017 by Liverpool University Press 4 Cambridge Street Liverpool L69 7ZU Copyright © 2017 Kevin Hearty The right of Kevin Hearty to be identified as the author of this book has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data A British Library CIP record is available print ISBN 978-1-78694-047-6 epdf ISBN 978-1-78694-828-1 Typeset by Carnegie Book Production, Lancaster Contents Acknowledgements vii List of Figures and Tables x List of Abbreviations xi Introduction 1 1 Understanding a Fraught Historical Relationship 25 2 Irish Republican Memory as Counter-Memory 55 3 Ideology and Policing 87 4 The Patriot Dead 121 5 Transition, ‘Never Again’ and ‘Moving On’ 149 6 The PSNI and ‘Community Policing’ 183 7 The PSNI and ‘Political Policing’ 217 Conclusion 249 References 263 Index 303 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This book has evolved from my PhD thesis that was undertaken at the Transitional Justice Institute, University of Ulster (TJI). When I moved to the University of Warwick in early 2015 as a post-doc, my plans to develop the book came with me too. It represents the culmination of approximately five years of research, reading and (re)writing, during which I often found the mere thought of re-reading some of my work again nauseating; yet, with the encour- agement of many others, I persevered.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Peace of Sorts”: a Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn Mcnamara
    “A Peace of Sorts”: A Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn McNamara A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy, Australian National University, March 2017 Declaration ii Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Professor Nicholas Brown who agreed to supervise me back in October 2014. Your generosity, insight, patience and hard work have made this thesis what it is. I would also like to thank Dr Ben Mercer, your helpful and perceptive insights not only contributed enormously to my thesis, but helped fund my research by hiring and mentoring me as a tutor. Thank you to Emeritus Professor Elizabeth Malcolm whose knowledge and experience thoroughly enhanced this thesis. I could not have asked for a better panel. I would also like to thank the academic and administrative staff of the ANU’s School of History for their encouragement and support, in Monday afternoon tea, seminars throughout my candidature and especially useful feedback during my Thesis Proposal and Pre-Submission Presentations. I would like to thank the McClay Library at Queen’s University Belfast for allowing me access to their collections and the generous staff of the Linen Hall Library, Belfast City Library and Belfast’s Newspaper Library for all their help. Also thanks to my local libraries, the NLA and the ANU’s Chifley and Menzies libraries. A big thank you to Niamh Baker of the BBC Archives in Belfast for allowing me access to the collection. I would also like to acknowledge Bertie Ahern, Seán Neeson and John Lindsay for their insightful interviews and conversations that added a personal dimension to this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism James
    University of Huddersfield Repository McAuley, James W. and Ferguson, Neil ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism Original Citation McAuley, James W. and Ferguson, Neil (2016) ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28 (3). pp. 561-575. ISSN 0954- 6553 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/27270/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Us & Them Running Heading: US & THEM ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism James W McAuley (University of Huddersfield) Neil Ferguson (Liverpool Hope University) Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to James W. McAuley, Institute for Research in Citizenship and Applied Human Sciences, School of Health and Human Sciences, University of Huddersfield, England, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Flags ‘Speak Security’? Written by Robert Aston
    Can Flags ‘Speak Security’? Written by Robert Aston This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. Can Flags ‘Speak Security’? https://www.e-ir.info/2016/05/23/can-flags-speak-security/ ROBERT ASTON, MAY 23 2016 To find out more about E-IR essay awards, click here. — Flags are political symbols, inherently linked to collective identities, they do not mean anything in themselves, but are ascribed meaning in a specific intersubjective context. Ideally flags are a unifying emblem for the nation, however in divided societies the flag takes on new meaning, and its presence becomes highly politicised and controversial. As flags embody a community, once they come under threat, it is symbolic of the community itself becoming endangered – and once the survival of an identity is threatened by an existential group, securitising moves by agents may be taken to protect their imagined community, moving ‘beyond’ the realm of ‘normal politics’. Thus, the abstracted ideas embodied in the flag has real world implications, and in this way flags can ‘speak security’, perhaps more powerfully and emotively than speech acts. Using the 2012 Flag Protests in Belfast as a case study, I hope to show that fragile national identities can become embodied, and even dependent upon this symbol. The Union Jack coming down from Belfast City Hall was perceived as an existential threat to the survival of the Loyalist community within the ‘new Northern Ireland’ – this threat was amplified by perceived political alienation and the normalisation of security practices within the province.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice, Truth and Oral History: Legislating the Past 'From Below' in Northern Ireland
    Justice, Truth and Oral History: Legislating the Past 'From Below' in Northern Ireland McEvoy, K., & Bryson, A. (2016). Justice, Truth and Oral History: Legislating the Past 'From Below' in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 67(1), 67-90. Published in: Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2016 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:27. Sep. 2021 NILQ 67(1): 67–90 Justice, truth and oral history: legislating the past ‘from below’ in Northern Ireland KIerAN Mcevoy ANd ANNA BrysoN 1 Queen’s University Belfast Abstract Drawing on the ‘from below’ perspective which has emerged in transitional justice scholarship and practice over the past two decades, this article critically examines the dealing with the past debate in Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]