Early Hunic Invaders of Central Asia That Influenced the History of India, China, and Eurasia, the Erection of Great Wall and Dark Period of Indian History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early Hunic Invaders of Central Asia That Influenced the History of India, China, and Eurasia, the Erection of Great Wall and Dark Period of Indian History Early Hunic Invaders of Central Asia that influenced the history of India, China, And Eurasia, the Erection of Great Wall and Dark Period of Indian History: By: Bipin Shah Dark Period of Indian history: During my world travel and visit to the Great Wall of China, I could not help wonder the real reasons for building such a massive wall at great cost of life and sacrifices? We always admire such monumental structure and cataloged them as “Great wonder of the world “. This and the pyramids are similar topics of the history that are often unknown to the public and never questioned or taught in the school. This type of subject not only intrigues me but compels me to investigate further. I decided to investigate further and found out how neatly this world event indirectly fits in to the puzzle of Indian subcontinent’s history, when Purana writers and the history keepers lost control of the Indian history and their genealogy of the Indian rulers. The Indian historian considers this to be the dark period of Indian history that began with the fall of Mauryan Empire and lasted until the rise of Gupta Empire. This is a total period of 500 to 550 years. During this period of uncertainty, India witnessed a massive influx of the foreign tribes from its borderland that was displaced as a result of chain reaction that started in the Northern China. India unwittingly became a melting pot of various ancient ethnicities during this “dark period” of the Indian history for which much remains unknown. Purana dismisses this event with one simple sentence: “Mlechha will rule India.” A similar melting process is now taking place in countries like America, Australia, Canada and South America but in a peaceful and orderly ways and the key driver for modern migration is the same that is just “economics”. However, during pre historical period, it was not orderly and civilized. The attacking invaders were savage and brutal soldiers of army who plundered everything and took the women. This resulted in the formation of mixed ethnicities and gene pools between various ancient races and ethnicities with the different anthropological and physical characteristics. This should serve as a reminder that the humanity is so mixed that there is no clear gene pool of the old world that exists today. The Great Walls of China: The Great Wall of China stretches from Shanhaiguan the east, to Lop Lake in the west that roughly delineates the southern edge of Inner Mongolia. According to Chinese archaeological survey, using satellite imageries have concluded that the China emperor Ming’s walls measure roughly 5,475 miles. This is made up 3,885 miles sections of actual wall, 225 miles of trenches and 1,390 miles of natural defensive barriers such as hills and rivers. Once everything is taken into account, the entire defensive structure will measure out to be 1 approximately 13,170 miles. The oldest section of the wall is dated to 5th century BC to prevent fellow Chinese ruling states to attack each others. The Han emperor Huangdi (220- 206 BC) built the western section to prevent the Mongolian Xiongnu tribe from North attacking the farmlands of Han kingdom. The successive emperors over several centuries used the slaves, soldier, criminals serving sentences and ordinary people to build this massive wall. The great wall is now designated as UNESCO world heritage site and one of the wonder of the ancient world. It serves as a reminder of the human spirit and effort that equates to no lesser value than sending a man to the moon during 20th century AD. Obviously many sacrificed their life in building this and other monuments of the world like pyramids ,Taj Mahal, Grand Mosque, coliseum, and countless other ancient monuments. The individual personal stories of the builders are unknown is now buried with them. Warring States Of Ancient china: In a Comparative chronology of India and china, when India emerged as a united country under Mauryan rule, the china was factionalized into warring states. Much of Northern part of China was inhabited by wild tribes of Mongol, Hun and Turkic ethnicities that constantly menaced their southern agriculturalist states of the south. This period of instability continued in China during 476 BC - 221 BC. During this initial stage, the ruling powers of individual southern warring states had began to build the defensive walls to protect themselves against each others. The state of Chu was the first to build a wall, followed by the Yan, Wei, Zhao and Qin Shi Huang (Huangdi). During warring state days, Qin Shi Huang (259 BC – 210 BC), personal name Zhao Zheng or Chao Cheng was the king of the Chinese State of Qin from 246 BC to 221 BC. He became the first emperor of a unified China in 221 BC. He ruled until his death in 210 BC at the young age of 49. He called himself as the First Han emperor “Shǐ Huangdi” or Huangdi. Huangdi, (Qin Shi Huang) became a pivotal figure in Chinese history. After unifying China, he and his chief advisor Li Si passed a series of major economic and political reforms. He undertook gigantic projects, including building and unifying various sections of the Great Wall of China, the now famous city-sized mausoleum guarded by the life-sized Terracotta Army, and a massive national road system, all at the expense of numerous lives. To ensure stability, Qin Shi Huang outlawed and burned many books and buried some scholars alive, he ordered General Meng Tian to connect the existing walls and to extend them further as a front line defense against possible invasion of the Hunic barbarians. This Hunic confederacy of Xiongnu tribes of Inner Mongolia of the north steppe was mostly made up of amalgam of Sino-Tibetan origin of Altaic (Turkic) and Mongoloid Hunic tribes. 2 Great Wall of China- at “Mutianyu” section near Beijing, China- Picture from the author’s visit in 2009 Today, the best known and most visited sections of the wall are at Badaling, Mutianyu, Simatai and Jinshanling and these were built during the later Ming Dynasty. They were all built to protect the people and territories situated south of the wall from a perpetual threat of raids and invasion by the enemies such as Mongols and later Huns. Initially, these walls among warring states were made mostly by stamping earth and gravel between board frames. Up on consolidation of warring states into a single Chinese empire by the first Han emperor, the walls were reinforced with stones from nearby mountains and subsequent Ming emperors continue to improve the fortification and construction techniques. 3 Chinese worker Building wall Chinese soldier Guarding the wall Barbarian –Xiongnu Hunic Tribe of North Stretch of Wall covering Massive Terrain 4 Panoramic view of the walls Xiongnu-Early Hunic Tribe referred as “Barbarian of the North Mangolia” Strabo, a Greek historian applied a generic label to all western central Asian tribes of Steppe beyond Anatolia as “Scythians”, based on similarity of customs and practices that he found on horse riding, bow shooting and other behaviors found consistent with the nomadic warrior group. However, Strabo did not travel beyond Persian borders to Eastern nomadic steppes. All horse riding pastoral nomads employed similar military tactics although their worshipping and cultural habits vary. Greeks, had very shallow and limited knowledge beyond east of Pamir mountain, therefore, Alexander, the great, who received the map form Archimedes, showed the end of the world near the valleys of the Afghanistan. The early Historians of middle ages relied heavily on similar characterization while ignoring the more precise identification made by neighboring regional countries like Persia, India and China. The access, availability and data from earlier historical texts of China and India have redefined some early observation. It is also should be noted that early Sanskrit Purana scholars were guilty of same crime by applying generic labels such as “Mlecchas” to all foreign tribes. The Romans and Persians employed the same labeling to equate all alien tribes that were not like them. The Xiongnu (Mongolian-Hsiung-nu); Chinese, Хүн or Хүннү, Khün or Khünnü; 匈奴匈奴匈奴 ; pinyin: Xiōngnú; Guangyun (Middle Chinese): Xiongnu (English), Xwn for Sogdinians, probably Old Turkic Qun were ancient pastoral nomadic-tribe that formed a state and confederacy located north of China in Inner Mongolia. Most of the information on the Xiongnu comes from Chinese sources. Very little are known of their titles and names and whatever the information that are presented from Chinese translation of ancient records and other observers of the past that are the subject to reinterpretation. An outside observer renders the verdict on other people they never encountered before based on their own personal experience and unseen alien behavior of others rather than understanding their culture in its totality. These nomadic tribes of North china depended on grazing lands for their animals with limited vegetation and agricultural resources. Their survival dependent on the access of grazing lands for their domesticated animals. The meat and dairy products from the animal provided the 5 food while skin hide provided clothing and tents for nomads. Primarily of Bronze Age culture, they were fierce and warlike nomads and excelled in horse riding and “hit and run” military strategy. Later they developed the access to the Iron Age weapons that produces devastating effect on other neighbors. Hans Kingdom was one of the most effected kingdoms of the warring states to suffer from Hunic raids. In order to counter the barbarians from the north, they sought military alliance with Yueh-Chinh. Yueh-Chinh for its own reasons declined the offer.
Recommended publications
  • Archaeological Perspectives on the Early Relations of the Korean Peninsula with the Eurasian Steppe
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 301 May, 2020 Archaeological Perspectives on the Early Relations of the Korean Peninsula with the Eurasian Steppe by Kang, In Uk Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS FOUNDED 1986 Editor-in-Chief VICTOR H. MAIR Associate Editors PAULA ROBERTS MARK SWOFFORD ISSN 2157-9679 (print) 2157-9687 (online) SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series dedicated to making available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor-in-chief actively encourages younger, not yet well established scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including romanized modern standard Mandarin and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. Submissions are regularly sent out for peer review, and extensive editorial suggestions for revision may be offered. Sino-Platonic Papers emphasizes substance over form.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Death Mystery of Huo Qubing, a Famous Cavalry General in the Western Han Dynasty
    Journal of Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology DOI: 10.23977/jfsst.2021.010410 Clausius Scientific Press, Canada Volume 1, Number 4, 2021 An Analysis of the Death Mystery of Huo Qubing, a Famous Cavalry General in the Western Han Dynasty Liu Jifeng, Chen Mingzhi Shandong Maritime Vocational College, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China Keywords: Huo qubing, Myth, Mysterious death Abstract: Throughout his whole lifetime, Huo Qubing created a myth of ancient war, and left an indelible mark in history. But, pitifully, he suddenly died during young age. His whole life was very short, and it seemed that Huo was born for war and died at the end of war. Although he implemented his great words and aspirations “What could be applied to get married, since the Huns haven’t been eliminated?”, and had no regrets for life, still, his mysterious death caused endless questions and intriguing reveries for later generations. 1. Introduction Huo Qubing, with a humble origin, was born in 140 B.C. in a single-parent family in Pingyang, Hedong County, which belongs to Linfen City, Shanxi Province now. He was an illegitimate child of Wei Shaoer, a female slave of Princess Pingyang Mansion, and Huo Zhongru, an inferior official. Also, he was a nephew-in-mother of Wei Qing, who was General-in-chief Serving as Commander-in-chief in the Western Han Dynasty. Huo Qubing was greatly influenced by his uncle Wei Qing. He was a famous military strategist and national hero during the period of Emperor Wudi of the Western Han Dynasty. He was fond of horse-riding and archery.
    [Show full text]
  • Abschlusspublikation Zum Herunterladen
    SONDERPROGRAMM ZENTRALASIEN ABSCHLUSSPUBLIKATION SPECIAL PROGRAMME CENTRAL ASIA FINAL PUBLICATION DIE GERDA HENKEL STIFTUNG BOT IN DEN JAHREN 2004 BIS 2013 EIN PROGRAMM ZUR FÖRDERUNG VON HERAUSRAGENDEN WISSENSCHAFTLERN AN, DIE SICH AUF DIE REGION ZENTRALASIEN KONZENTRIEREN. ZIEL DES PROGRAMMS WAR ES, FORSCHUNGSARBEITEN INSBESONDERE IM BEREICH DER ARCHÄOLOGIE UND DER KUNSTGESCHICHTE, ABER AUCH IN DEN DISZIPLINEN GESCHICHTE, HISTORISCHE ISLAMWISSENSCHAFT, ARCHITEKTUR UND KUNSTWISSENSCHAFT ANZUREGEN. BESONDERS BERÜCKSICHTIGT WURDEN WISSENSCHAFTLER AUS DER REGION ZENTRALASIEN. EBENFALLS GEFÖRDERT WURDEN KOOPERATIONSPROJEKTE ZWISCHEN WISSENSCHAFTLERN AUS DEN ZIELLÄNDERN UND EUROPÄISCHEN ZENTRALASIEN-FORSCHERN. DIE FÖRDERUNG DES WISSENSCHAFTLICHEN NACHWUCHSES WAR DABEI EIN BESONDERES ANLIEGEN DER STIFTUNG. FROM 2004 TO 2013, THE GERDA HENKEL FOUNDATION OFFERED A PROGRAMME TO SUPPORT OUTSTANDING SCHOLARS, WHOSE RESEARCH IS FOCUSED ON CENTRAL ASIA. THE PROGRAMME AIMED TO STIMULATE ACADEMIC RESEARCH PROJECTS IN THE AREAS OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND ART HISTORY AS WELL AS PROJECTS IN THE FIELDS OF HISTORY, HISTORIC ISLAMIC STUDIES, ARCHITECTURE, AND THE FINE ARTS. SCIENTISTS FROM CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES WERE INVITED TO APPLY FOR THIS PROGRAMME. MOREOVER, IT SUPPORTED PROJECTS THAT IDEALLY WERE BASED ON COOPERATION BETWEEN SCHOLARS FROM THE TARGETED REGION AND EUROPEAN EXPERTS SPECIALIZED IN CENTRAL ASIA. A SPECIAL CONCERN OF THE FOUNDATION WAS THE ADVANCEMENT OF POSTGRADUATES. VORWORT FOREWORD Seit ihrer Gründung im Jahr 1976 unterstützt die Gerda Henkel
    [Show full text]
  • Map 99 Bactria Compiled by F.T
    Map 99 Bactria Compiled by F.T. Hiebert and P.L. Kohl, 1995 Introduction (See Map 98) Directory Names Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location References B2 Air tepe CHRL UZB Rtveladze 1974, 78 (B-36) B2 Airtam HR UZB Rtveladze 1974, 74 (B-2) C3 Aivadzh HR TAJ Stavisky 1986, fig. 6 C1 Ak kurgan HR TAJ Stavisky 1986, fig. 4 B2 Ak tepe HR UZB Rtveladze 1974, 76 (B-23) B3 Ala Chaupan L AFG Ball 1982.25 D2 Alexandria Oxiana? H Ai Khanoum / Barbarah Ptol. 6.12.6; Bernard 1978; Ball 1982.18; AFG Fraser 1996, 153-56 D3 Ali Qutan HR AFG Ball 1982.31 C3 Aliabad HR Qal'a-i Giubi / Tahari tepe Ball 1982.29 AFG B3 Aornos H Khulm (Tashkurgan)? Arrian 3.29; Bosworth 1980, 372 AFG Archi = Kafir Qal'a B2 Arpa-paya tepe CH UZB Rtveladze 1974, 80 (B-54) B4 Artamis? fl. RL Ab-e-Khulm AFG AmmMarc 23.6.57; Fontaine 1977, 103-104 C2 Aruktau RL UZB Rtveladze 1974, 75; Litvinskii 1984, 105 D3 Astakana HRL Astana tepe? AFG Ptol. 6.11.8; Ball 1982.61 § Astatia AmmMarc 23.6.58 B2 Baba tepe UZB See Map 98 A3 Bactra/ AFG See Map 98 Zariaspa B2 Bactria HR DiodSic 2.37.6; Pliny, NH 6.92; André 1980, 64-65; Lyonnet 1993 §Aseni R Eggermont 1970, 70, 122-23 § Baktrioi CHR Hdt. 3.102, 7.66; Arrian 3.8; Foucher 1942, 197 § Bactriani HRL PME 47; AmmMarc 23.6.55; § Zariaspai R André 1986, 279 A3 Bactrus?/ AFG See Map 6 Zariaspis? fl.
    [Show full text]
  • EASAA 2005 Handbook of Papers and Panels
    EASAA 2005 Handbook of Papers and Panels List of Panels Mind the Gap: Continuity and Change in South Asian Archaeology (Monday July 4 2.00 – 5.00) Convenors: Prof. Robin Coningham (University of Bradford) & Dr. Ruth Young,( University of Leicester) Ethnoarchaeology in the Himalayas (Monday July 4 2.00 – 5.00) Convenors: Lindsay Zamponi (Ph.D Candidate, SOAS, London) and Dr. Tadeuz Skorupski (SOAS, London) Indo•Iranian Borderlands (Monday July 4 1.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Morteaza Hessari (National Museum of Iran) & Prof. Vasant Shinde (Deccan College, Pune) Technology, Regional Interaction and the Indus Civilisation (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Prof. Mark Kenoyer (University of Wisconsin•Madison) & Dr. Rita Wright (Deparment of Anthropology, New York University) The Temple in South Asia (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Dr. Adam Hardy (University of Cardiff) & Dr. Crispin Branfoot (De Montfort University) Issues in Gangetic Archaeology (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 12.30) Convenor: Robert Harding (UCL Institute of Archaeology Numismatic, Literary and Epigraphic Evidence on Chronology in Gandhara (Tuesday July 6 9.30 – 5.00) Convenor: Dr. Osmund Bopearachchi (C.N.R.S.) Issues in Northwestern Art and Iconography (Tuesday July 5 2.00 – 5.00 Convenors: Dr. Martha L. Carter, Dr. Carolyn Schmidt Tibetan Epigraphy and Petroglyphs (Tuesday 5 July 2.00 – 5.00) Convenor: Dr. Philip Denwood (SOAS, London) Economies in South Asia (Wednesday July 6 9.30 – 4.30) Convenors: Dorian Q. Fuller: Institute of Archaeology, University College London & Dr. Richard Meadow: Director, Harappa Archaeological Project, Peabody Museum, Harvard University) The Hephthalites (Wednesday July 6 9.30 – 4.30) Convenors: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea-Caspian Steppe: Natural Conditions 20 1.1 the Great Steppe
    The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450 General Editors Florin Curta and Dušan Zupka volume 74 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ecee The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe By Aleksander Paroń Translated by Thomas Anessi LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. Publication of the presented monograph has been subsidized by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the National Programme for the Development of Humanities, Modul Universalia 2.1. Research grant no. 0046/NPRH/H21/84/2017. National Programme for the Development of Humanities Cover illustration: Pechenegs slaughter prince Sviatoslav Igorevich and his “Scythians”. The Madrid manuscript of the Synopsis of Histories by John Skylitzes. Miniature 445, 175r, top. From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. Proofreading by Philip E. Steele The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://catalog.loc.gov/2021015848 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Wai Kit Wicky Tse University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Tse, Wai Kit Wicky, "Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 589. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Abstract As a frontier region of the Qin-Han (221BCE-220CE) empire, the northwest was a new territory to the Chinese realm. Until the Later Han (25-220CE) times, some portions of the northwestern region had only been part of imperial soil for one hundred years. Its coalescence into the Chinese empire was a product of long-term expansion and conquest, which arguably defined the egionr 's military nature. Furthermore, in the harsh natural environment of the region, only tough people could survive, and unsurprisingly, the region fostered vigorous warriors. Mixed culture and multi-ethnicity featured prominently in this highly militarized frontier society, which contrasted sharply with the imperial center that promoted unified cultural values and stood in the way of a greater degree of transregional integration. As this project shows, it was the northwesterners who went through a process of political peripheralization during the Later Han times played a harbinger role of the disintegration of the empire and eventually led to the breakdown of the early imperial system in Chinese history.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Yuezhi - Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology”, by Hans Loeschner
    “Notes on the Yuezhi - Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology”, by Hans Loeschner Notes on the Yuezhi – Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology By Hans Loeschner Professor Michael Fedorov provided a rejoinder1 with respect to several statements in the article2 “A new Oesho/Shiva image of Sasanian ‘Peroz’ taking power in the northern part of the Kushan empire”. In the rejoinder Michael Fedorov states: “The Chinese chronicles are quite unequivocal and explicit: Bactria was conquered by the Ta-Yüeh-chih! And it were the Ta-Yüeh-chih who split the booty between five hsi-hou or rather five Ta-Yüeh-chih tribes ruled by those hsi-hou (yabgus) who created five yabguates with capitals in Ho-mo, Shuang-mi, Hu-tsao, Po-mo, Kao-fu”. He concludes the rejoinder with words of W.W. Tarn3: “The new theory, which makes the five Yüeh- chih princes (the Kushan chief being one) five Saka princes of Bactria conquered by the Yüeh- chih, throws the plain account of the Hou Han shu overboard. The theory is one more unhappy offshoot of the elementary blunder which started the belief in a Saka conquest of Greek Bactria”.1 With respect to the ethnical allocation of the five hsi-hou Laszlo Torday provides an analysis with a result which is in contrast to the statement of Michael Fedorov: “As to the kings of K’ang- chü or Ta Yüeh-shih, those chiefs of foreign tribes who acknowledged their supremacy were described in the Han Shu as “lesser kings” or hsi-hou. … The hsi-hou (and their fellow tribespeople) were ethnically as different from the Yüeh-shih and K’ang-chü as were the hou… from the Han.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan
    The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan George Fiske Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 George Fiske All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan George Fiske This study examines the socioeconomics of state formation in medieval Afghanistan in historical and historiographic terms. It outlines the thousand year history of Ghaznavid historiography by treating primary and secondary sources as a continuum of perspectives, demonstrating the persistent problems of dynastic and political thinking across periods and cultures. It conceptualizes the geography of Ghaznavid origins by framing their rise within specific landscapes and histories of state formation, favoring time over space as much as possible and reintegrating their experience with the general histories of Iran, Central Asia, and India. Once the grand narrative is illustrated, the scope narrows to the dual process of monetization and urbanization in Samanid territory in order to approach Ghaznavid obstacles to state formation. The socioeconomic narrative then shifts to political and military specifics to demythologize the rise of the Ghaznavids in terms of the framing contexts described in the previous chapters. Finally, the study specifies the exact combination of culture and history which the Ghaznavids exemplified to show their particular and universal character and suggest future paths for research. The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan I. General Introduction II. Perspectives on the Ghaznavid Age History of the literature Entrance into western European discourse Reevaluations of the last century Historiographic rethinking Synopsis III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition of Inner Asian Groups in the Central Plain During the Sixteen Kingdoms Period and Northern Dynasties
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2018 Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties Fangyi Cheng University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, and the Asian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cheng, Fangyi, "Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties" (2018). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2781. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2781 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2781 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties Abstract This dissertation aims to examine the institutional transitions of the Inner Asian groups in the Central Plain during the Sixteen Kingdoms period and Northern Dynasties. Starting with an examination on the origin and development of Sinicization theory in the West and China, the first major chapter of this dissertation argues the Sinicization theory evolves in the intellectual history of modern times. This chapter, in one hand, offers a different explanation on the origin of the Sinicization theory in both China and the West, and their relationships. In the other hand, it incorporates Sinicization theory into the construction of the historical narrative of Chinese Nationality, and argues the theorization of Sinicization attempted by several scholars in the second half of 20th Century. The second and third major chapters build two case studies regarding the transition of the central and local institutions of the Inner Asian polities in the Central Plain, which are the succession system and the local administrative system.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego County Treasurer-Tax Collector 2019-2020 Returned Property Tax Bills
    SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 2019-2020 RETURNED PROPERTY TAX BILLS TO SEARCH, PRESS "CTRL + F" CLICK HERE TO CHANGE MAILING ADDRESS PARCEL/BILL OWNER NAME 8579002100 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8579002104 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8579002112 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8679002101 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8679002105 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8679002113 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8779002102 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8779002106 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8779002114 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8879002103 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8879002107 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 8879002115 11-11 GIFT TRUST 04-01-96 5331250200 1141 LAGUNA AVE L L C 2224832400 1201 VIA RAFAEL LTD 3172710300 12150 FLINT PLACE LLC 2350405100 1282 PACIFIC OAKS LLC 4891237400 1360 E MADISON AVENUE L L C 1780235100 138 SUN VILLA CT LLC 8894504458 138 SUN VILLA CT LLC 2222400700 1488 SAN PABLO L L C 1300500500 15195 HWY 76 TRUST 04-084 1473500900 152 S MYERS LLC 4230941300 1550 GARNET LLC 2754610900 15632 POMERADO ROAD L L C 1678 COUNTRY CLUB DR ESCONDIDO CA 92029 TRUST 05-07- 2325114700 18 1678 COUNTRY CLUB DR ESCONDIDO CA 92029 TRUST 05-07- 8894616148 18 2542212300 1697A LA COSTA MEADOWS L L C 2542212400 1697A LA COSTA MEADOWS L L C 6461901900 1704 CACTUS ROAD LLC 5333021200 1750 FIFTH AVENUE L L C 2542304001 180 PHOEBE STREET LLC 5392130600 1815-19 GRANADA AVENUE LLC 5392130700 1815-19 GRANADA AVENUE LLC 2643515400 18503 CALLE LA SERRA L L C 2263601300 1991 TRUST 12-02-91 AND W J K FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP 5650321400 1998 ENG FAMILY L L C 5683522300 1998 ENG FAMILY L L
    [Show full text]
  • The Huns Between Central Asia, the Near East, and Europe: The
    Wissenschaftliche Abteilung der Zentrale Wiegandhaus December 2 Podbielskiallee 69-71 14195 Berlin 9:00-10:30 Xiongnu, Xwn, and Huns Chair: Richard Payne (Oriental Institute Chicago) The Huns between Central Asia, the Near East, and Europe: 9:00 Jan Bemmann (University of Bonn), The Archaeology of Nomadic Imperialism, circa 300 CE – 600 CE Ursula Brosseder (University of Bonn), December 1-3 2016 Bryan Miller (University of Oxford), Michael Schmauder (University of Bonn), Program and time schedule The Xiongnu-Hun Connection – against the Common Opinion December 1 9:45 David Sneath (University of Cambridge), Tribe or State? Rethinking Evolutionist Models of Hun Society 14:00 Welcome and Introduction Philipp von Rummel (DAI, Head Office Berlin), 10:30 Coffee Break Richard Payne (Oriental Institute Chicago) 11:00-12:30 Hun Regimes in Central Asia 14:30-16:00 Eurasian Approaches to Late Antiquity Chair: Dmitri Korobov (Russian Academy of Science, Moscow) Chair: Walter Pohl (Austrian Academy of Science, Vienna) 11:00 Nikolaus Boroffka (DAI, Eurasia Department), 14:30 Michael Maas (Rice University, Houston), Leonid Sverchkov (Academy of Sciene of Uzbekistan, Tashkent), Introducing Eurasian Late Antiquity: A New Approach to a Transitional Kakhramon Tepa, Southern Uzbekistan. A 4th-5th Century AD Monu- Age ment in Context 15:15 Michael Kulikowski (Penn State, State College), 11:45 Sören Stark (Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York), The History and Archaeology of Global Late Antiquity: Huns in Sogdiana: The Archaeological Perspective Prospects and Pitfalls of Cooperation 12:30 Lunch Break 16:00 Coffee Break 14:00-15:30 Hun Regimes in the North Caucasus 16:30-18:00 Nomadic Empire Formation: New Theories, New Evidence Chair: Sabine Reinhold (DAI, Eurasia Department Berlin) Chair: Sven Hansen (DAI, Eurasia Department Berlin) 14:00 Murtazali Gadjiev (Russian Academy of Science, Daghestan Center), 16:30 Bryan Miller (University of Oxford), Iran vs.
    [Show full text]